nach oben

Education and Information Technologies

Erschienen in:

10.08.2023

Toward a new educational reality: A mapping review of the role of e-assessment in the new digital context

verfasst von: Alberto Ortiz-López, Susana Olmos-Migueláñez, José Carlos Sánchez-Prieto

Erschienen in: Education and Information Technologies | Ausgabe 6/2024

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Today, education is facing a new reality in which technology and new teaching methods are being quickly introduced into educational systems and institutions. Educational institutions are now dealing with the challenge of providing continuity to e-learning, turning it into a more flexible and up-to-date field, and considering assessment as a quality element in this transition. Therefore, with the aim of determining the current state of the research focused on assessment in digital environments (e-assessment), a mapping of the literature has been carried out. After examining 1,771 results extracted from Web of Science and Scopus and after the application of seven inclusion criteria, a total of 159 publications from the period of the past five years were read. The answer four research questions on the evolution of publications, the authors, the tools used, the contexts, the objects of study, and the future avenues of research, among others. The results show the increasing importance of e-assessment in this new context, moving toward a new reality in which technology plays a decisive and fundamental role in the teaching and learning processes. Thus, educational systems are heading towards a new context in which both teachers and students should rethink their roles and functions leading education to a more flexible, current, and digitally mediated context.

Vorheriger Artikel What motivate learners to continue a professional development program through Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs)?: A lens of self-determination theory

Nächster Artikel Fostering students’ scientific literacy by reflective questioning: An identification, summarization, self-reflective questioning, and application (ISSA)-based flipped learning approach

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Abdou, R. A. E. (2020). Effects of e-assessment tools in academic achievement and motivation towards learning among preservice kindergarten teachers in Turaif. Amazonia Investiga, 9(28). https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2020.28.04.24

Al-Emran, M., Mezhuyev, V., & Kamaludin, A. (2018). Technology Acceptance Model in M-learning context: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 124, 389–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.008CrossRef

Alkiş, N., & Coşkunçay, D. F. (2018). Mobile learning acceptance: A systematic literature review. Erzincan University Journal of Education Faculty, 20(2), 571–589.

Almossa, S. Y. (2021). University students’ perspectives toward learning and assessment during COVID-19. Education and Information Technologies, 26(6), 7163–7181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10554-8CrossRef

Alrofou, A., Lakulu, M. M., & Almaiah, M. (2019). A systematic review of mobile-based assessment acceptance studies from 2009 to 2019. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 97, 1–25.

Alruwais, N. (2018). Advantages and challenges of using e-assessment. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 8(1), 34–37. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2018.8.1.1008CrossRef

AlTameemy, F. A. Q., Alrefaee, Y., & Alalwi, F. S. S. (2020). Using blackboard as a tool of e-assessment in testing writing skill in saudi arabia. Retrieved January 1, 2023, from http://repository.psau.edu.sa:80/jspui/handle/123456789/1229784. Accessed 27 Jan 2023.

Atoum, Y., Chen, L., Liu, A. X., Hsu, S. D. H., & Liu, X. (2017). Automated online exam proctoring. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 19(7), 1609–1624. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMM.2017.2656064CrossRef

Babo, R., Babo, L., Suhonen, J. T., & Tukiainen, M. (2020). E- Assessment with multiple-choice questions: A 5 Year study of students’ opinions and experience. Journal of Information Technology Education: Innovations in Practice, 19, 001–029.

Bacca-Acosta, J., & Avila-Garzon, C. (2021). Student engagement with mobile-based assessment systems: A survival analysis. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37(1), 158–171. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12475CrossRef

Balta, N., Perera-Rodríguez, V.-H., & Hervás-Gómez, C. (2018). Using Socrative as an online homework platform to increase students’ exam scores. Education and Information Technologies, 23(2), 837–850. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9638-6CrossRef

Bickerton, R., & Sangwin, C. (2021). Practical online assessment of mathematical proof. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 0(0), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2021.1896813CrossRef

Black, P. J. (1993). Formative and summative assessment by teachers. Studies in Science Education, 21(1), 49–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057269308560014MathSciNetCrossRef

Boote, S. K., Boote, D. N., & Williamson, S. (2021). Assessing graph comprehension on paper and computer with MBA students: A crossover experimental study. Cogent Education, 8(1), 1960247. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2021.1960247CrossRef

Burgos-Videla, C. (2021). Innovación y aprendizajes flexibles en entornos formativos universitarios. Innovación y Aprendizajes Flexibles En Entornos Formativos Universitarios, 1–152.

Cabero-Almenara, J., & Palacios-Rodríguez, A. (2021). La evaluación de la educación virtual: Las e-actividades. RIED. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 24(2), Art. 2. https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.24.2.28994CrossRef

Cakiroglu, U., Erdogdu, F., Kokoc, M., & Atabay, M. (2017). Students’ preferences in online assessment process: Influences on academic performances. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 18(1), 132–142.CrossRef

Chacín, R. (2021). Los docentes y la evaluación en la modalidad virtual. Interacciones, 1(1), Art. 1. Retrieved March 15, 2023, from https://p3.usal.edu.ar/index.php/interacciones/article/view/5531. Accessed 15 Mar 2023.

Cheng, X., Chan, L. K., Cai, H., Zhou, D., & Yang, X. (2021). Adaptions and perceptions on histology and embryology teaching practice in China during the Covid-19 pandemic. Translational Research in Anatomy, 24, 100115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tria.2021.100115CrossRef

Chiu, T. K. F., Xia, Q., Zhou, X., Chai, C. S., & Cheng, M. (2023). Systematic literature review on opportunities, challenges, and future research recommendations of artificial intelligence in education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, 100118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100118CrossRef

Cooper, I. D. (2016). What is a “mapping study?” Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA, 104(1), 76–78. https://doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.104.1.013CrossRef

Crompton, H., Burke, D., Jordan, K., & Wilson, S. W. G. (2021). Learning with technology during emergencies: A systematic review of K-12 education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(4), 1554–1575. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13114CrossRef

Cutumisu, M. (2018). The informational value of feedback choices for performance and revision in a digital assessment game. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 15(4), 363–380. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-03-2018-0017CrossRef

Daly, C., Pachler, N., Mor, Y., & Mellar, H. (2010). Exploring formative e-assessment: Using case stories and design patterns. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35, 619–636. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602931003650052CrossRef

Dascalu, M.-D., Ruseti, S., Dascalu, M., McNamara, D. S., Carabas, M., Rebedea, T., & Trausan-Matu, S. (2021). Before and during COVID-19: A Cohesion Network Analysis of students’ online participation in moodle courses. Computers in Human Behavior, 121, 106780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106780CrossRef

Delaney, D., Kummer, T.-F., & Singh, K. (2019). Evaluating the impact of online discussion boards on student engagement with group work. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(2), 902–920. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12614CrossRef

DeMara, R., Chen, B., Hartshorne, R., & Thripp, R. (2017). Elevating participation and outcomes with computer-based assessments: An immersive development workshop for engineering faculty. Computers in Education Journal, 8, 1–12.

Dermo, J. (2009). e-Assessment and the student learning experience: A survey of student perceptions of e-assessment. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(2), 203–214. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00915.xCrossRef

Dixson, D. D., & Worrell, F. C. (2016). Formative and Summative Assessment in the Classroom. Theory into Practice, 55(2), 153–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2016.1148989CrossRef

Doğan, N., Kibrislioglu Uysal, N., Kelecioglu, H., & Hambleton, R. (2020). An Overview of E-Assessment. 35, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.16986/HUJE.2020063669

Domingo-Coscollola, M., Bosco, A., Carrasco-Segovia, S., & Sánchez, J. A. (2020). Fomentando la competencia digital docente en la universidad: Percepción de estudiantes y docentes. https://doi.org/10.6018/rie.340551

Dorris, C., Winter, K., O’Hare, L., & Lwoga, E. T. (2021). PROTOCOL: A systematic review of mobile device use in the primary school classroom and its impact on pupil literacy and numeracy attainment. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1155

Dutton, P. J., Bickerstaff, H. E., Rymer, J. M., Webb, M. E., Ballinger-Mills, D., Greenough, A., & Reynolds, P. A. (2017). Investigation of Formative Assessment of Learning (INFORMAL): The Performance Indicator Tool (PIT). Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 22(2), 161–171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-017-9307-2CrossRef

Egarter, S., Mutschler, A., & Brass, K. (2021). Impact of COVID-19 on digital medical education: Compatibility of digital teaching and examinations with integrity and ethical principles. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-021-00084-8

Faber, J. M., Luyten, H., & Visscher, A. J. (2017). The effects of a digital formative assessment tool on mathematics achievement and student motivation: Results of a randomized experiment. Computers & Education, 106, 83–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.12.001CrossRef

Forero-Peña, D. A., Carrión-Nessi, F. S., Camejo-Ávila, N. A., & Forero-Peña, M. J. (2020). COVID-19 en Latinoamérica: Una revisión sistemática de la literatura y análisis bibliométrico. Revista de Salud Pública, 22(2), 246–252. https://doi.org/10.15446/rsap.v22n2.86878CrossRef

García-Aretio, L. (2021). ¿Podemos fiarnos de la evaluación en los sistemas de educación a distancia y digitales? RIED. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 24(2), Art. 2. https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.24.2.30223CrossRef

García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2021). Transformación digital en las universidades: Implicaciones de la pandemia de la COVID-19. Education in the Knowledge Society: EKS, 22, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.14201/eks.25465CrossRef

García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2022). Developing robust state-of-the-art reports: Systematic Literature Reviews. Education in the Knowledge Society, 23. https://doi.org/10.14201/eks.28600

Geomar, E. (2020). Percepciones de los estudiantes pre-universitarios sobre el perfil del profesor virtual. Conference proceedings CIVINEDU 2020: 4th International Virtual Conference on Educational Research and Innovation September 23–24, 2020, 2020, ISBN 978–84–09–22966–6, 271–272. Retrieved March 15, 2023, from https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=7837919. Accessed 15 Mar 2023.

Ghouali, K., Benmoussat, S., & Ruiz-Cecilia, R. (2020). E-assessment on the spotlight: Present and future prospects. ReiDoCrea: Revista electrónica de Investigación Docencia Creativa, 9, 52–62. https://doi.org/10.30827/Digibug.59151CrossRef

González-González, R. A., & Silveira-Bonilla, M. H. (2022). Educación e inteligencia artificial: Nodos temáticos de inmersión. Edutec. Revista Electrónica de Tecnología Educativa, 82, Article 82.

Grande-de-Prado, M., García-Peñalvo, F. J., Almuzara, A. C., & Abella-García, V. (2021). Evaluación en Educación Superior durante la pandemia de la COVID-19. Campus Virtuales, 10(1), Article 1.

Grigoryeva, N. V., Melikov, I. M., Palanchuk, N. V., Kokhanovskaya, I. I., & Aralova, E. (2021). Opportunities for organizing distance learning presented by the moodle platform: experience in the conditions of the COVID-19 pandemic. Propósitos y Representaciones, 9, e1259. https://doi.org/10.20511/pyr2021.v9nSPE3.1259CrossRef

Guerrero-Roldán, A.-E., & Noguera, I. (2018). A model for aligning assessment with competences and learning activities in online courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 38, 36–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2018.04.005CrossRef

Gupta, A., Gupta, K., Joshi, A., & Sharma, D. (2019). Tools for E-Assessment Techniques in Education: A Review. En Handbook of Research on E-Assessment in Higher Education (pp. 28–52). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-5936-8.ch002

Hassan, B., Shati, A. A., Alamri, A., Patel, A., Asseri, A. A., Abid, M., Al-Qahatani, S. M., & Satti, I. (2020). Online assessment for the final year medical students during covid-19 pandemics; the exam quality and students’ performance. Onkologia i Radioterapia, 1–6.

Heil, J., & Ifenthaler, D. (2023). Online assessment in higher education: A systematic review. Online Learning, 27(1). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v27i1.3398

Humanante-Ramos, P., Fernández-Acevedo, J., & Jiménez, C. (2019). Aulas virtuales en contextos universitarios: Percepciones de uso por parte de los estudiantes. Revista ESPACIOS, 40(2), 3–20

Ifanov, Jessica, P., Salim, S., Syahputra, M. E., & Suri, P. A. (2023). A Systematic literature review on implementation of virtual reality for learning. Procedia Computer Science, 216, 260–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2022.12.135CrossRef

Jaiswal, P. (2020). Integrating educational technologies to augment learners’ academic achievements. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 15(02), Article 02. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i02.11809CrossRef

Jiménez, Y. I., Hernández, J., & Rodríguez, E. (2021). Educación en línea y evaluación del aprendizaje: De lo presencial a lo virtual. RIDE. Revista Iberoamericana para la Investigación y el Desarrollo Educativo, 12(23). https://doi.org/10.23913/ride.v12i23.1005

Judge, M. (2021). Covid 19, school closures and the uptake of a digital assessment for learning pilot project during Ireland’s national lockdown. Irish Educational Studies, 40(2), 419–429. https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2021.1917443CrossRef

Kitchenham, B., Budgen, D., & Brereton, P. (2011). Using mapping studies as the basis for further research: A participant-observer case study. Information & Software Technology, 53, 638–651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2010.12.011CrossRef

Khlaisang, J., & Koraneekij, P. (2019). Open online assessment management system platform and instrument to enhance the information, media, and ICT literacy skills of 21st century learners. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 14, 111. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v14i07.9953CrossRef

Knight, P. T. (2002). Summative assessment in higher education: Practices in disarray. Studies in Higher Education, 27(3), 275–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070220000662MathSciNetCrossRef

Kotiash, I., Shevchuk, I., Borysonok, M., Matviienko, I., Popov, M., Terekhov, V., & Kuchai, O. (2022). Possibilities of Using Multimedia Technologies in Education. 22, 727-732. https://doi.org/10.22937/IJCSNS.2022.22.6.91

Kühbeck, F., Berberat, P. O., Engelhardt, S., & Sarikas, A. (2019). Correlation of online assessment parameters with summative exam performance in undergraduate medical education of pharmacology: A prospective cohort study. BMC Medical Education, 19(1), 412. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1814-5CrossRef

Kundu, A., & Bej, T. (2021). Experiencing e-assessment during COVID-19: An analysis of Indian students’ perception. Higher Education Evaluation and Development, 15(2), 114–134. https://doi.org/10.1108/HEED-03-2021-0032CrossRef

Lai, J., & Bower, M. (2019). How is the use of technology in education evaluated? A systematic review. Computers & Education, 133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.01.010

Lee, K., & Fanguy, M. (2022). Online exam proctoring technologies: Educational innovation or deterioration? British Journal of Educational Technology. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13182CrossRef

Lin, J.-W., Tsai, C.-W., & Hsu, C.-C. (2020). A comparison of computer-based and game-based formative assessments: A long-term experiment. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1815219

Liu, Y., Béliveau, A., Besche, H., Wu, A. D., Zhang, X., Stefan, M., Gutlerner, J., & Kim, C. (2021). Bayesian mixed effects model and data visualization for understanding item response time and response order in open online assessment. Frontiers in Education, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.607260

Marshall, C., & Brereton, P. (2013). Tools to Support Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering: A Mapping Study. Conference: 7th International Symposium on Empirical Software and Measurement (ESEM 2013), 296–299. https://doi.org/10.1109/ESEM.2013.32

Mastan, I., Sensuse, D., Suryono, R., & Kautsarina, K. (2022). Evaluation of distance learning system (e-learning): A systematic literature review. Jurnal Teknoinfo, 16, 132. https://doi.org/10.33365/jti.v16i1.1736CrossRef

Martínez-Soto, T., & Prendes-Espinosa, P. (2023). A systematic review on the role of ICT and CLIL in compulsory education. Education Sciences, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13010073

McCallum, S., & Milner, M. M. (2021). The effectiveness of formative assessment: Student views and staff reflections. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1754761CrossRef

Mellar, H., Peytcheva-Forsyth, R., Kocdar, S., Karadeniz, A., & Yovkova, B. (2018). Addressing cheating in e-assessment using student authentication and authorship checking systems: Teachers’ perspectives. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 14(1), Art. 1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-018-0025-xCrossRef

Mimirinis, M. (2019). Qualitative differences in academics’ conceptions of e-assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(2), 233–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1493087CrossRef

Misut, M., & Misutova, M. (2017). Software solution improving productivity and quality for big volume students’ group assessment process. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 12(04), Art. 04. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v12i04.6608CrossRef

Montenegro-Rueda, M., Luque-de la Rosa, A., Sarasola Sánchez-Serrano, J. L., & Fernández-Cerero, J. (2021). Assessment in higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review. Sustainability, 13(19), Article 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131910509CrossRef

Morales, Y. A. R., García, M. G., & López, C. B. (2018). Evaluación de competencias genéricas en la universidad. Estudio comparativo en entorno b-learning y presencial. Estudio comparativo en. Acción Pedagógica, 27(1), 6–21.

Muñoz-Guevara, E., Velázquez-García, G., & Barragán-López, J. F. (2021). Análisis sobre la evolución tecnológica hacia la Educación 4.0 y la virtualización de la Educación Superior. Transdigital, 2(4), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.56162/transdigital86CrossRef

Muhaimin, M., Habibi, A., Riady, Y., Alqahtani, T. M., Chaerunisaa, A. Y., Wijaya, T. T., Milanda, T., Yusop, F. D., & Albelbisi, N. A. (2023). Covid-19 distance and online learning: A systematic literature review in pharmacy education. BMC Medical Education, 23(1), 367. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04346-6CrossRef

Nasab, F. G. (2015). Alternative versus traditional assessment. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 2(6), Article 6.

Nguyen, Q., Rienties, B., Toetenel, L., Ferguson, R., & Whitelock, D. (2017). Examining the designs of computer-based assessment and its impact on student engagement, satisfaction, and pass rates. Computers in Human Behavior, 76, 703–714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.028CrossRef

Nikou, S. A., & Economides, A. A. (2018). Mobile-Based micro-Learning and Assessment: Impact on learning performance and motivation of high school students. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 34(3), 269–278. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12240CrossRef

Nikou, S., & Economides, A. (2017a). Mobile-Based Assessment: Integrating acceptance and motivational factors into a combined model of Self-Determination Theory and Technology Acceptance. Computers in Human Behavior, 68, 83–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.020CrossRef

Nikou, S., & Economides, A. (2017b). Mobile-based assessment: Investigating the factors that influence behavioral intention to use. Computers & Education, 109, 56–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.02.005

Nikou, S., & Economides, A. (2019). A comparative study between a computer-based and a mobile-based assessment: Usability and user experience. Interactive Technology and Smart Education. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-01-2019-0003CrossRef

Ninković, S., Olić Ninković, S., Lazarević, T., & Adamov, J. (2021). Serbian teachers’ perceptions of online assessment during COVID-19 school closure: The role of teachers’ self-efficacy. Educational Studies, 0(0), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2021.1960151CrossRef

Nyland, R., Davies, R. S., Chapman, J., & Allen, G. (2017). Transaction-level learning analytics in online authentic assessments. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 29(2), 201–217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-016-9122-0CrossRef

Okada, A., Noguera, I., Alexieva, L., Rozeva, A., Kocdar, S., Brouns, F., Ladonlahti, T., Whitelock, D., & Guerrero-Roldán, A.-E. (2019a). Pedagogical approaches for e-assessment with authentication and authorship verification in Higher Education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(6), 3264–3282. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12733CrossRef

Okada, A., Whitelock, D., Holmes, W., & Edwards, C. (2019b). e-Authentication for online assessment: A mixed-method study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(2), 861–875. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12608CrossRef

Ozdamli, F., & Karagozlu, D. (2022). Online education during the pandemic: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 17(16), Article 16. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v17i16.32287CrossRef

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., …, & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372(372). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Palacios, C., Rubio, M., & Arce, M. (2021). Percepciones y experiencias de los estudiantes de Odontología en educación en línea: Una revisión bibliográfica. Applied Sciences in Dentistry, 1(0), Art. 0. https://doi.org/10.22370/asd.2020.1.0.2627CrossRef

Pearse-Romera, C. R., & Ruiz-Cecilia, R. (2019). A motivation case study of students learning english at a secondary school in Granada, Spain. The International Journal of Interdisciplinary Educational Studies, 14(1), 31–45. https://doi.org/10.18848/2327-011X/CGP/v14i01/31-45CrossRef

Pozzo, M. I., Borgobello, A., & Pierella, M. P. (2018). Uso de cuestionarios en investigaciones sobre universidad: Análisis de experiencias desde una perspectiva situada. Revista Latinoamericana de Metodología de las Ciencias Sociales, 8(2), e046. Retrieved March 16, 2023, from https://www.memoria.fahce.unlp.edu.ar/library?a=d&c=arti&d=Jpr9347. Accessed 16 Mar 2023.

Pu, S., & Xu, H. (2021). Examining changing assessment practices in online teaching: A multiple-case study of EFL school teachers in China. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 30(6), 553–561. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-021-00605-6CrossRef

Ramírez, L. N. R. (2020). Tendencias de la innovación educativa en los contextos sociales. Análisis del mapeo de literatura. Revista Educación, 44(1), 381–398. https://doi.org/10.15517/revedu.v44i1.33222CrossRef

Raza, S. A., Qazi, W., Khan, K. A., & Salam, J. (2021). Social isolation and acceptance of the Learning Management System (LMS) in the time of COVID-19 pandemic: An expansion of the UTAUT model. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 59(2), 183–208. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633120960421CrossRef

Riera, J., Ardid, M., Gómez, J. A., Vidaurre, A., & Meseguer, J. M. (2018). Students’ perception of auto-scored online exams in blended assessment: Feedback for improvement. Educación XX1: Revista de La Facultad de Educación, 21(2), 79–103. https://doi.org/10.5944/educxx1.19559CrossRef

Rolim, C., & Isaias, P. (2018). Examining the use of e‐assessment in higher education: Teachers and students’ viewpoints. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12669

Ruiz-Morales, Y. (2013). Evaluación de competencias genéricas en la Universidad. Estudio comparativo en entorno b-learning y presencial. Tesis [Tesis Doctoral]. Universidad Complutense de Madrid.

Samala, A. D., Usmeldi, Taali, Ambiyar, Bojic, L., Indarta, Y., Tsoy, D., Denden, M., Tas, N., & Dewi, I. P. (2023). Metaverse technologies in education: A systematic literature review using PRISMA. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 18(5). https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v18i05.35501

Sánchez-Prieto, J. C., Olmos-Migueláñez, S., & García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2017). MLearning and pre-service teachers: An assessment of the behavioral intention using an expanded TAM model. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 644–654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.061CrossRef

Schwartzman, G., Roni, C., Berk, M., Delorenzi, E., Sánchez, M., & Eder, M. L. (2021). Evaluación Remota de Aprendizajes en la Universidad: Decisiones docentes para encarar un nuevo desafío. RIED. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 24(2), Art. 2. https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.24.2.29078CrossRef

Sellés, N. H., Carril, P. C. M., & Sanmamed, M. G. (2018). La e-evaluación en el trabajo colaborativo en entornos virtuales: Análisis de la percepción de los estudiantes. Edutec. Revista Electrónica de Tecnología Educativa, 65, Art. 65. https://doi.org/10.21556/edutec.2018.65.997CrossRef

Sembey, R., Hoda, R., & Grundy, J. (2023). Emerging technologies in higher education assessment and feedback practices: A systematic literature review. SSRN Electronic Journal, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4328075

Seraj, P. M., Chakraborty, R., Mehdi, T., & Roshid, M. M. (2022). A systematic review on pedagogical trends and assessment practices during the COVID-19 pandemic: Teachers’ and students’ perspectives. Education Research International, 2022, e1534018. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1534018CrossRef

Sirianni, J. M., Ng, Y. J., & Vishwanath, A. (2017). Adopting computer-based assessments: The role of perceived value in classroom technology acceptance. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 7(4), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.29333/ojcmt/2607CrossRef

Slade, C., Lawrie, G., Taptamat, N., Browne, E., Sheppard, K., & Matthews, K. E. (2022). Insights into how academics reframed their assessment during a pandemic: Disciplinary variation and assessment as afterthought. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(4), 588–605. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.1933379CrossRef

Smith, C. A. (2021). Development and integration of freely available technology into online stem courses to create a proctored environment during exams. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 21(5). https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v21i5.4274

Snekalatha, S., Marzuk, S. M., Meshram, S. A., Maheswari, K. U., Sugapriya, G., & Sivasharan, K. (2021). Medical students’ perception of the reliability, usefulness, and feasibility of unproctored online formative assessment tests. Advances in Physiology Education, 45(1), 84–88. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00178.2020CrossRef

St-Onge, C., Ouellet, K., Lakhal, S., Dubé, T., & Marceau, M. (2022). COVID-19 as the tipping point for integrating e-assessment in higher education practices. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(2), 349–366. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13169CrossRef

Stanković, J., Milovanović, S., & Radović, O. (2017). Applying the moodle platform in online student self-assessment. Economic Themes, 55(2), 281–304. https://doi.org/10.1515/ethemes-2017-0016CrossRef

Szymkowiak, A., Melović, B., Dabić, M., Jeganathan, K., & Kundi, G. S. (2021). Information technology and Gen Z: The role of teachers, the internet, and technology in the education of young people. Technology in Society, 65, 101565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101565CrossRef

Tomas, C., Borg, M., & McNeil, J. (2015). E-assessment: Institutional development strategies and the assessment life cycle. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(3), 588–596. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12153CrossRef

Timmis, S., Broadfoot, P., Sutherland, R., & Oldfield, A. (2015). Rethinking assessment in a digital age: Opportunities, challenges and risks. British Educational Research Journal, 42(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3215

Vázquez, J. J., Chiang, E. P., & Sarmiento-Barbieri, I. (2021). Can we stay one step ahead of cheaters? A field experiment in proctoring online open book exams. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 90, 101653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2020.101653

Wang, Z., Gong, S.-Y., Xu, S., & Hu, X.-E. (2019). Elaborated feedback and learning: Examining cognitive and motivational influences. Computers & Education, 136, 130–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.04.003CrossRef

Washburn, S., Herman, J., & Stewart, R. (2017). Evaluation of performance and perceptions of electronic vs. Paper multiple-choice exams. Advances in Physiology Education, 41, 548–555. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00138.2016

Witchel, H. J., Guppy, J. H., & Smith, C. F. (2018). The self-assessment dilemma: An open-source, ethical method using Matlab to formulate multiple-choice quiz questions for online reinforcement. Advances in Physiology Education, 42(4), 697–703. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00081.2018CrossRef

Wu, P., & Wang, Y. (2021). Investigating business english teachers’ belief about online assessment: Q methodology conducted during COVID-19 period. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 30(6), 621–630. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-021-00604-7CrossRef

Zhang, C., Yan, X., & Wang, J. (2021). EFL teachers’ online assessment practices during the COVID-19 pandemic: Changes and mediating factors. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 30(6), 499–507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-021-00589-3CrossRef

Zharova, M. V., Trapitsin, S. Yu., Timchenko, V. V., & Skurihina, A. I. (2020). Problems and Opportunities of Using LMS Moodle before and during COVID-19 Quarantine: Opinion of Teachers and Students. 2020 International Conference Quality Management, Transport and Information Security, Information Technologies (IT&QM&IS), 554–557. https://doi.org/10.1109/ITQMIS51053.2020.9322906

Titel: Toward a new educational reality: A mapping review of the role of e-assessment in the new digital context
verfasst von: Alberto Ortiz-López
Susana Olmos-Migueláñez
José Carlos Sánchez-Prieto
Publikationsdatum: 10.08.2023
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Education and Information Technologies / Ausgabe 6/2024
Print ISSN: 1360-2357
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7608
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12117-5

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2024

A bi-phenomenon analysis to escalate higher educators’ competence in developing university students’ information literacy (HECDUSIL): the role of language lectures’ conceptual and action-oriented digital competencies and skills

Enhancing children’s cognitive skills: An experimental study on virtual reality-based gamified educational practices

Is stress motivation? Effects of perceived stress on online self-directed learning of college students in China

Optimizing learning return on investment: Identifying learning strategies based on user behavior characteristic in language learning applications

Assessment of learning parameters for students' adaptability in online education using machine learning and explainable AI

The evolution of IoT education within an IT curriculum

Premium Partner