nach oben

TechTrends

Erschienen in:

12.08.2021 | Original Paper

Towards a Framework for Integrating Digital Portfolios into Teacher Education

verfasst von: Stefanie Y. L. Chye

Erschienen in: TechTrends | Ausgabe 5/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

A problem with applications of innovations and technological tools such as the digital portfolio is that, while detailed conceptions and examples of digital portfolios exist, there is a chasm of practical advice that is sufficiently generic for guiding considerations on how to integrate digital portfolios into different learning environments. In this paper, it is argued that a powerful framework for guiding thinking about the integration of digital portfolios into teacher education is provided by cultural-historical activity theory or CHAT. CHAT is useful because it has been shown to provide a clear operational framework for the design of learning environments that support the integration of various technological tools.

Vorheriger Artikel Student Engagement Patterns in a Blended Learning Environment: an Educational Data Mining Approach

Nächster Artikel Starting Conversations on Visual Media and Global Learning

Barab, S. A., Barnett, M., Yamagata-Lynch, L., Squire, K., & Keating, T. (2004). Using activity theory to conceptualise online community and using online community to conceptualise activity theory. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 11(1), 25–47.CrossRef

Bass, R., & Eynon, B. (2017). From unbundling to rebundling: Design principles for transforming institutions in the new digital ecosystem. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 49(2), 8–17.CrossRef

Bernstein, B. (2000). Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity: Theory, research, critique. Rowman and Littlefield.

Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments in nature and design. Harvard University Press.

Bronfenbrenner, U. (1994). Ecological models of human development. In T. Husen & T. N. Postlethwaite (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (Vol. 3, 2nd ed., pp. 1643–1647). Pergamon Press.

Chye, S., Zhou, M. M., Koh, C., & Liu, W. C. (2019). Using e-portfolios to facilitate reflection: Insights from an activity theoretical analysis. Teaching and Teacher Education, 85, 24–35, 2.411.

Cole, M. (1995). Socio-cultural-historical psychology: Some general remarks and a proposal for a new kind of cultural-genetic methodology. In J. V. Wertsch, P. D. Río, & A. Alvarez (Eds.), Sociocultural studies of mind (pp. 187–214). Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Divaharan, S., & Lim, C. P. (2010). Secondary school socio-cultural context influencing ICT integration: A case study approach. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(6), 741–763.CrossRef

Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. .

Engeström, Y. (1993). Developmental studies of work as a testbench of activity theory: The case of primary care medical practice. In S. Chaiklin & J. Lave (Eds.), Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity and context (pp. 64–103). Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Engeström, Y. (1999). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, & R.-L. Punamäki (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 19–38). Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Engeström, Y. (2000). Activity theory as a framework for analyzing and redesigning work. Ergonomics, 43(7), 960–974.CrossRef

Engeström, Y., & Miettinen, R. (1999). Introduction. In Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, & R.-L. Punamäki (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 1–18). Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Engeström, Y., & Sannino, A. (2010). Studies of expansive learning: Foundations, findings and future challenges. Educational Research Review, 5(1), 1–110.CrossRef

Eynon, B., & Gambino, L. M. (2017). High-impact ePortfolio practice: A catalyst for student, faculty, and institutional learning. LLC: Stylus Publishing.

Eynon, B., Gambino, L. M., & Török, J. (2014). What difference can ePortfolio make? A field report from the connect to learning project. International Journal of ePortfolio, 4(1), 95–114.

Girot, E. A. (2000). Assessment of graduates and diplomats in practice in the UK: Are we measuring the same level of competence? Journal of Clinical Nursing, 9, 330–337.CrossRef

Granberg, C. (2010). E-portfolio in teacher education 2002–2009: The social construction of discourse, design and dissemination. European Journal of Teacher Education, 33(3), 309–322.CrossRef

Haggerty, C., & Thompson, T. (2017). The challenges of incorporating ePortfolio into an undergraduate nursing programme. Open Praxis, 9(2), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.9.2.554.CrossRef

Hamilton, M. (2018). Bridging the gap from teacher to teacher educator: The role of a teaching portfolio. Studying Teacher Education, 14(1), 88–102.CrossRef

Hardman, J. (2005). Activity theory as a framework for understanding teachers' perceptions of computer usage at a primary school level in South Africa. South African Journal of Education, 25(4), 258–265.

Harris, S., Dolan, G., & Fairbairn, G. (2001). Reflection on the use of student portfolios. Nurse Education Today, 21, 278–286.CrossRef

Hopper, T. F., Fu, H., Sanford, K., & Monk, D (2018) What is a digital electronic portfolio in teacher education? a case study of instructors’ and students’ enabling insights on the electronic portfolio process. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 44(2), Retrieved January 20, 2021 from https://www.cjlt.ca/index.php/cjlt/article/view/27634

Jaworski, B., Robinson, C., Matthews, J., & Croft, T. (2013). Using activity theory to make sense of differences in perspectives on mathematics teaching. Paper presented at the PME 37 - the 37th conference of the International Group for the Psychology of mathematics education; mathematics learning across the life span (28 July - 2 august), Kiel, Germany.

Jonassen, D. H., & Rohrer-Murphy, L. (1999). Activity theory as a framework for designing constructivist learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(1), 61–79.CrossRef

Joyes, G., Gray, L., & Hartnell-Young, E. (2010). Effective practice with e-portfolios: How can the UK experience inform implementation? Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(1).

Koh, C., Liu, W. C., Zhou, M. M., & Chye, S. (2011, July). The use of eportfolio to enhance future teachers' learning and teaching. Paper presented at 9th ePortfolio and Identity Conference (ePIC), London, United Kingdom.

Kuutti, K. (1991). Activity theory and its applications to information systems research and development. In H. E. Nissen, H. K. Klein, & R. Hirschheim (Eds.), Information systems research: Contemporary approaches and emergent traditions (pp. 529–549). Elsevier Science Publishers B. V.

Kuutti, K. (1996). Activity theory as a potential framework for human-computer interaction research. In B. A. Nardi (Ed.), Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction (pp. 17–44). The MIT Press.

Larsen, D. P. (2019). Cultural historical activity theory: The role of tools and tensions in medical education. Academic Medicine, 94, 1255.CrossRef

Larsen, D. P., Wesevich, A., Lichtenfeld, J., Artino, A. R., Brydges, R., & Varpio, L. (2017). Tying knots: An activity theory analysis of student learning goals in clinical education. Medical Education, 51, 687–698.CrossRef

Lim, C. P. (2006). The science and art of integrating ICT in Singapore schools. Singapore: iT21.

Lim, C. P. (2007). Effective integration of ICT in Singapore schools: Pedagogical and policy implications. Education Technology Research and Development, 55, 83–116.CrossRef

Lim, C. P., & Hang, D. (2003). An activity theory approach to research of ICT integration in Singapore schools. Computers and Education, 41, 49–63.CrossRef

Loughran, J., & Corrigan, D. (1995). Teaching portfolios a strategy for developing learning and teaching in pre-service teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11, 565–577.CrossRef

Luera, G., Brunvand, S., & Marra, T. (2016). Challenges and rewards of implementing ePortfolios through a bottom-up approach. International Journal of EPortfolio, 6(2), 127–137.

Lynch, L. L. & Purnawarman, P. (2004). Electronic portfolio assessments in U.S. educational and instructional technology programs: Are they supporting teacher education? TechTrends, 48(1). 50–56.

Masters, J. (2016). Ready? Action! Building a portfolio of evidence in teacher education. In 2016 ePortfolio forum: Connecting learning to the future - book of papers. eLearning services, Queensland University of Technology, Australia (pp. 17–24).

Matthews-DeNatale, G., Blevins-Bohanan, S. J., Rothwell, C. G., & Wehlburg, C. M. (2017). Redesigning learning: Eportfolios in support of reflective growth within individuals and organisations. In T. Bateson, K. S. Coleman, H. L. Chen, C. E. Watson, T. L. Rhodes, & A. Harver (Eds.), Field guide to Eportfolio (pp. 14–24). Association of American Colleges and Universities.

Mwalongo, A. I. (2016). Using activity theory to understand student teacher perceptions of effective ways for promoting critical thinking through asynchronous discussion forums. In D. S. P. Gedera & P. J. Williams (Eds.), Activity theory in education (pp. 19–34). Sense Publishers.CrossRef

Nagle, L., O'Connell, M., & Farrelly, T. (2019). A gap in governance: Acknowledging the challenges of organic ePortfolio implementation. Educational Media International, 56(4), 328–342. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2019.1682271.CrossRef

Oakley, G., Pegrum, M., & Johnston, S. (2014). Introducing digital portfolios to pre-service teachers as tools for reflection and growth: Lessons learnt. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 42(1), 36–50.CrossRef

Poklop, L., & Peagler, C. (2010). Translating faculty visions into Eportfolio designs. The Association for Authentic, experiential and evidence-based learning world summit. Boston, MA.

Poole, P., Brown, M., McNamara, G., O’Hara, J., O’Brien, S., & Burns, D. (2018). Challenges and supports towards the integration of ePortfolios in education. Lessons to be learned from Ireland. Heliyon, 4(e00899). doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00899.

Rogoff, B. (1995). Observing sociocultural activity on three planes: Participatory appropriation, guided participation, and apprenticeships. In J. V. Wertsch, P. D. Rio, & A. Alvarez (Eds.), Sociocultural studies of mind (pp. 139–164). Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Rogoff, B. (1998). Cognition as a collaborative process. In D. Kuhn & R. S. Siegler (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Cognition, perceptions and language (5th ed., pp. 679–744). John Wiley & Sons, Inc..

Roth, W.-M., & Lee, Y.-J. (2007). "Vygotsky's neglected legacy": Cultural-historical activity theory. Review of Educational Research, 77(2), 186–232.CrossRef

Scully, D., O’Leary, M., & Brown, M. (2018). The learning portfolio in higher education: A game of snakes and ladders. Dublin: Dublin City University, Centre for Assessment Research, Policy & Practice in education (CARPE) and National Institute for digital learning (NIDL).

Stanger, N. (2011). Moving “eco” back into socio-ecological models: A proposal to reorient ecological literacy into human developmental models and school systems. Human Ecology Review, 18(2), 167–173.

Stone, B. (1998). Problems, pitfalls, and benefits of portfolios. Teacher Education Quarterly, 25(1), 105–114. Retrieved January 20, 2021, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/23478111

Totter, A., & Wyss, C. (2019). Opportunities and challenges of e-portfolios in teacher education. Lessons learnt. Research on Education and Media, 11, 69–75.CrossRef

Watson, C. E., Kuh, G. D., Rhodes, T., Light, T. P., & Chen, H. L. (2016). Editorial: ePortfolios-the eleventh high impact practice. International Journal of ePortfolio, 6(2), 65–69.

Wray, S. (2007). E-portfolios in a teacher education program. E-Learning, 4(1), 40–51.

Wray, S. (2008). Swimming upstream: Shifting the purpose of an existing teaching portfolios requirement. The Professional Educator, 32(35–50).

Yamagata-Lynch, L. C. (2010). Activity systems analysis methods: Understanding complex learning environments. Springer.CrossRef

Titel: Towards a Framework for Integrating Digital Portfolios into Teacher Education
verfasst von: Stefanie Y. L. Chye
Publikationsdatum: 12.08.2021
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: TechTrends / Ausgabe 5/2021
Print ISSN: 8756-3894
Elektronische ISSN: 1559-7075
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-021-00646-0

Springer Professional

Towards a Framework for Integrating Digital Portfolios into Teacher Education

Abstract

Premium Partner

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2021

Visualization of Knowledge with Concept Maps in a Teacher Education Course

Starting Conversations on Visual Media and Global Learning

Student Engagement Patterns in a Blended Learning Environment: an Educational Data Mining Approach

Supporting Cross-Cultural Pedagogy with Online Tools: Pedagogical Design and Student Perceptions

The Critical Theories We Need Now: a Perspective from the CLT Graduate Student Working Group

Photovoice 2.0: A Comprehensive Research Framework for the Digital Generation

Premium Partner