nach oben

Management Review Quarterly

Erschienen in:

29.09.2022

Trends in research on climate change and organizations: a bibliometric analysis (1999–2021)

verfasst von: Julián Andres Díaz Tautiva, Joana Huaman, Roberto D. Ponce Oliva

Erschienen in: Management Review Quarterly | Ausgabe 1/2024

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

The effects of climate change are a source of uncertainty for businesses worldwide. Climate change has been causing significant and disruptive changes in the socio-ecological systems in which organizations interact. This study aims to provide a holistic assessment of the intersection of climate change and organizational literature since the end of the twentieth century. It seeks answers to the following questions: What is the evolution of this subject during 1999–2021? What are the leading research organizations and main journals contributing to this subject? Who are the main authors? What thematic clusters are found in the literature? Which theme has not been sufficiently researched and requires further attention? We analyzed 1476 publications obtained from the Web of Science database using two bibliometric methods: co-citation and co-word network analysis. The analysis showed that the University of Queensland, Australia, is the most productive research organization, and Energy Policy is the most productive journal. Ans Kolk and Michael E. Porter are the most cited authors in the literature. The cluster analysis identified five main themes: corporate environmental strategies and policies, corporate environmental outcomes and reporting, corporate environmental pressures, corporate governance and environmental management, and environmental finance.

Vorheriger Artikel Nonprofit capacity and social performance: mapping the field and future directions

Nächster Artikel A systematic literature review on knowledge management in SMEs: current trends and future directions

Adelekan IO, Simpson NP, Totin E, Trisos CH (2022) In: IPCC sixth assessment report (AR6): climate change 2022-impacts, adaptation and vulnerability: regional factsheet Africa.

Adenle AA, Ford JD, Morton J, Twomlow S, Alverson K, Cattaneo A, Cervigni R, Kurukulasuriya P, Huq S, Helfgott A, Ebinger JO (2017) Managing climate change risks in Africa - a global perspective. Ecol Econ 141:190–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.06.004CrossRef

Alayo M, Iturralde T, Maseda A, Aparicio G (2021) Mapping family firm internationalization research: bibliometric and literature review. Rev Manag Sci 15(6):1517. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-020-00404-1CrossRef

Aleixandre-Tudó JL, Bolaños-Pizarro M, Aleixandre JL, Aleixandre-Benavent R (2019) Current trends in scientific research on global warming: a bibliometric analysis. Int J Glob Warm 17(2):142–169. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJGW.2019.097858CrossRef

Aliouche EH, Schlentrich UA (2011) Towards a strategic model of global franchise expansion. J Retail 87(3):345–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2011.01.004WE-SocialScienceCitationIndex(SSCI)CrossRef

Al-Tuwaijri SA, Christensen TE, Hughes KE (2004) The relations among environmental disclosure, environmental performance, and economic performance: a simultaneous equations approach. Acc Organ Soc 29(5–6):447–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(03)00032-1CrossRef

Babiker MH (2005) Climate change policy, market structure, and carbon leakage. J Int Econ 65(2):421–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2004.01.003CrossRef

Bao Q, Tang L, Zhang Z, Wang S (2013) Impacts of border carbon adjustments on China’s sectoral emissions: simulations with a dynamic computable general equilibrium model. China Econ Rev 24:77–94CrossRef

Ben-Amar W, McIlkenny P (2015) Board effectiveness and the voluntary disclosure of climate change information. Bus Strateg Environ 24(8):704–719CrossRef

Ben-Amar W, Chang M, McIlkenny P (2017) Board gender diversity and corporate response to sustainability initiatives: Evidence from the carbon disclosure project. J Bus Ethics 142(2):369–383CrossRef

Benavente JMG (2016) Impact of a carbon tax on the Chilean economy: a computable general equilibrium analysis. Energy Econ 57:106–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2016.04.014WE-SocialScienceCitationIndex(SSCI)CrossRef

Berkhout F (2012) Adaptation to climate change by organizations. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Change 3(1):91–106. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.154CrossRef

Bhatt Y, Ghuman K (2022) Corporate environmental responsiveness: a bibliometric and content analysis. Manag Rev Quart. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-022-00275-8CrossRef

Block J, Fisch C (2020) Eight tips and questions for your bibliographic study in business and management research. Manag Rev Quart 70(3):307–312CrossRef

Block J, Fisch C, Rehan F (2020) Religion and entrepreneurship: a map of the field and a bibliometric analysis. Manag Rev Quart 70(4):591. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-019-00177-2CrossRef

Bremer J, Linnenluecke MK (2017) Determinants of the perceived importance of organisational adaptation to climate change in the Australian energy industry. Aust J Manag 42(3):502–521. https://doi.org/10.1177/0312896216672273CrossRef

Bui B, De Villiers C (2017) Business strategies and management accounting in response to climate change risk exposure and regulatory uncertainty. Br Account Rev 49(1):4–24CrossRef

Bürer MJ, Wüstenhagen R (2009) Which renewable energy policy is a venture capitalist’s best friend? Empirical evidence from a survey of international cleantech investors. Energy Policy 37(12):4997–5006CrossRef

Busch T (2011) Organizational adaptation to disruptions in the natural environment: the case of climate change. Scand J Manag 27(4):389–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2010.12.010CrossRef

Bužavaitė M, Ščeulovs D, Korsakienė R (2019) Theoretical approach to the internationalization of SMEs: future research prospects based on bibliometric analysis. Entrep Sustain Issues 6(3):1497–1511. https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2019.6.3(31)CrossRef

Callon M, Courtial J-P, Turner WA, Bauin S (1983) From translations to problematic networks: an introduction to co-word analysis. Soc Sci Inf 22(2):191–235CrossRef

Cao K, He P, Liu Z (2020) Production and pricing decisions in a dual-channel supply chain under remanufacturing subsidy policy and carbon tax policy. J Oper Res Soc 71(8):1199–1215CrossRef

Castellanos EJ, Lemos MF (2022) IPCC sixth assessment report (AR6): climate change 2022-impacts, adaptation and vulnerability: regional factsheet central and South America.

Chapple L, Clarkson PM, Gold DL (2013) The cost of carbon: capital market effects of the proposed emission trading scheme (ETS). Abacus 49(1):1–33CrossRef

Chava S (2012) Environmental externalities and cost of capital. SSRN Electron J. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1677653CrossRef

Clarkson P, Li Y, Richardson GD, Vasvari FP (2008) Revisiting the relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: an empirical analysis. Acc Organ Soc 33(4–5):303–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2007.05.003CrossRef

Clarkson P, Li Y, Pinnuck M, Richardson GD (2015) The valuation relevance of greenhouse gas emissions under the European Union carbon emissions trading scheme. Eur Account Rev 24(3):551–580. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2014.927782CrossRef

Clarkson P, Li Y, Richardson G, Tsang A (2019) Causes and consequences of voluntary assurance of CSR reports. Account Audit Account J 32(8):2451–2474. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-03-2018-3424CrossRef

Crick F, Eskander SMSU, Fankhauser S, Diop M (2018) How do African SMEs respond to climate risks? Evidence from Kenya and Senegal. World Dev 108:157–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.03.015CrossRef

Delmas M, Montiel I (2009) Greening the supply chain: when is customer pressure effective ? J Econ Manag Strateg 18(1):171–201. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9134.2009.00211.xWE-SocialScienceCitationIndex(SSCI)CrossRef

Delmas MA, Montes-Sancho MJ (2010) Voluntary agreements to improve environmental quality: symbolic and substantive cooperation. Strateg Manag J31(6):575–601

Demski C, Capstick S, Pidgeon N, Sposato RG, Spence A (2017) Experience of extreme weather affects climate change mitigation and adaptation responses. Clim Change 140(2):149–164CrossRef

DiMaggio PJ, Powell WW (1983) The iron cage revisited : institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Am Sociol Rev 48(2):147–160CrossRef

Doran J, Ryan G (2016) The importance of the diverse drivers and types of environmental innovation for firm performance. Bus Strateg Environ 25(2):102–119CrossRef

Du HS, Xu J, Li Z, Liu Y, Chu SKW (2021) Bibliometric mapping on sustainable development at the base-of-the-pyramid. J Clean Prod 281:125290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125290CrossRef

Escobar LF, Vredenburg H (2011) Multinational oil companies and the adoption of sustainable development: a resource-based and institutional theory interpretation of adoption heterogeneity. J Bus Ethics 98(1):39–65CrossRef

Esty DC, Porter ME (2001) Ranking national environmental regulation and performance: a leading indicator of future competitiveness? Glob Compet Rep 2002:78–100

Fisher-Vanden K, Thorburn KS (2011) Voluntary corporate environmental initiatives and shareholder wealth. J Environ Econ Manag 62(3):430–445CrossRef

Foxon TJ (2013) Transition pathways for a UK low carbon electricity future. Energy Policy 52:10–24CrossRef

Frerichs IM, Teichert T (2021) Research streams in corporate social responsibility literature: a bibliometric analysis. Manag Rev Quart. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-021-00237-6CrossRef

Galbreath J (2010) Corporate governance practices that address climate change: an exploratory study. Bus Strateg Environ 19(5):335–350CrossRef

Gallego-Álvarez I, García-Sánchez IM, da Silva Vieira C (2014) Climate change and financial performance in times of crisis. Bus Strateg Environ 23(6):361–374CrossRef

Gallego-Alvarez I, Formigoni H, Antunes MTP (2014) Corporate social responsibility practices at brazilian firms. RAE-REVISTA DE ADMINISTRACAO DE EMPRESAS 54(1):12–27. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-759020140103WE-SocialScienceCitationIndex(SSCI)CrossRef

Gasbarro F, Pinkse J (2016) Corporate adaptation behaviour to deal with climate change: the influence of firm-specific interpretations of physical climate impacts. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 23(3):179–192. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1374CrossRef

Goyal S, Chauhan S, Mishra P (2021) Circular economy research: A bibliometric analysis (2000–2019) and future research insights. J Clean Prod 287:125011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125011CrossRef

Guillén L, Sergio A, Manuel C (2021) Research on social responsibility of small and medium enterprises: a bibliometric analysis. Manag Rev Quart. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-021-00217-wCrossRef

Haddock-Fraser JE, Tourelle M (2010) Corporate motivations for environmental sustainable development: exploring the role of consumers in stakeholder engagement. Bus Strateg Environ 19(8):527–542CrossRef

Hale T, Roger C (2014) Orchestration and transnational climate governance. Rev Int Organ 9(1):59–82CrossRef

Hansen C, Steinmetz H, Block J (2021) How to conduct a meta-analysis in eight steps: a practical guide. Manag Rev Quart pp 1–19

Hao H, Geng Y, Li W, Guo B (2015) Energy consumption and GHG emissions from China’s freight transport sector: scenarios through 2050. Energy Policy 85:94–101CrossRef

Haque F (2017) The effects of board characteristics and sustainable compensation policy on carbon performance of UK firms. Br Account Rev 49(3):347–364CrossRef

Haque F, Ntim CG (2018) Environmental policy, sustainable development, governance mechanisms and environmental performance. Bus Strateg Environ 27(3):415–435CrossRef

Hart SL (1995) A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Sour Acad Manag Rev 20(4):986–1014. https://doi.org/10.2307/258963CrossRef

Hennessy K, Lawrence J, Mackey B (2022). IPCC sixth assessment report (AR6): climate change 2022-impacts, adaptation and vulnerability: regional factsheet Australasia.

Heal G, Kriström B (2002) Uncertainty and climate change. Environ Resource Econ 22(1):3–39

Herweijer C, Ranger N, Ward RET (2009) Adaptation to climate change: threats and opportunities for the insurance industry. Geneva Pap Risk Insur Issues Pract 34(3):360–380. https://doi.org/10.1057/gpp.2009.13CrossRef

Hess DJ (2014) Sustainability transitions: a political coalition perspective. Res Policy 43(2):278–283CrossRef

Heutel G (2012) How should environmental policy respond to business cycles? Optimal policy under persistent productivity shocks. Rev Econ Dyn 15(2):244–264CrossRef

Hrasky S (2012) Carbon footprints and legitimation strategies: symbolism or action? Account Audit Account J 25:174CrossRef

Hu J, Pan X, Huang Q (2020) Quantity or quality? The impacts of environmental regulation on firms’ innovation–Quasi-natural experiment based on China’s carbon emissions trading pilot. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 158:120122CrossRef

Huang YA, Lenzen M, Weber CL, Murray J, Matthews HS (2009) The role of input–output analysis for the screening of corporate carbon footprints. Econ Syst Res 21(3):217–242CrossRef

Huang Y, Bor YJ, Peng C-Y (2011) The long-term forecast of Taiwan’s energy supply and demand: LEAP model application. Energy Policy 39(11):6790–6803CrossRef

Hübler M, Voigt S, Löschel A (2014) Designing an emissions trading scheme for China—An up-to-date climate policy assessment. Energy Policy 75:57–72CrossRef

Ingham A, Ma J, Ulph A (2007) Climate change, mitigation and adaptation with uncertainty and learning. Energy Policy 35(11):5354–5369CrossRef

IPCC (2022) Climate change 2022: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability: sixth IPCC assessment report. Cambridge University Press London

Iwata H, Okada K (2011) How does environmental performance affect financial performance? Evidence from Japanese manufacturing firms. Ecol Econ 70(9):1691–1700CrossRef

Jayanthakumaran K, Verma R, Liu Y (2012) CO₂ emissions, energy consumption, trade and income: a comparative analysis of China and India. Energy Policy 42:450–460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.12.010CrossRef

Jung J, Herbohn K, Clarkson P (2018) Carbon risk, carbon risk awareness and the cost of debt financing. J Bus Ethics 150(4):1151–1171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3207-6CrossRef

Kabisch N, Frantzeskaki N, Pauleit S, Naumann S, Davis M, Artmann M, Haase D, Knapp S, Korn H, Stadler J (2016) Nature-based solutions to climate change mitigation and adaptation in urban areas: perspectives on indicators, knowledge gaps, barriers, and opportunities for action. Ecol Soc. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-08373-210239CrossRef

Kolk A (2016) The social responsibility of international business: from ethics and the environment to CSR and sustainable development. J World Bus 51(1):23–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2015.08.010CrossRef

Kolk A, Pinkse J (2005) Business responses to climate change: identifying emergent strategies. Calif Manag Rev 47(3):6–19. https://doi.org/10.2307/41166304CrossRef

Kolk A, Pinkse J (2008) A perspective on multinational enterprises and climate change: learning from “an inconvenient truth”? J Int Bus Stud 39(8):1359–1378CrossRef

Kolk A, Levy D, Pinkse J (2008) Corporate responses in an emerging climate regime: the institutionalization and commensuration of carbon disclosure. Eur Account Rev 17(4):719–745. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180802489121CrossRef

Kress JC (2022) Banking’s climate conundrum. SSRN Electron J. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4075967CrossRef

Kücher A, Feldbauer-Durstmüller B (2019) Organizational failure and decline – a bibliometric study of the scientific frontend. J Bus Res 98:503–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.05.017CrossRef

Kuckertz A, Block J (2021) Reviewing systematic literature reviews: ten key questions and criteria for reviewers. Manag Rev Quart 71(3):519–524. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-021-00228-7CrossRef

Kumar S, Managi S, Matsuda A (2012) Stock prices of clean energy firms, oil and carbon markets: a vector autoregressive analysis. Energy Econ 34(1):215–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2011.03.002CrossRef

Kuo L, Yeh C, Yu H (2012) Disclosure of corporate social responsibility and environmental management: evidence from China. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 19(5):273–287CrossRef

Lattemann C, Fetscherin M, Alon I, Li S, Schneider A (2009) CSR communication intensity in Chinese and Indian multinational companies. Corp Gov Int Rev 17(4):426–442CrossRef

Lengnick-Hall CA, Beck TE (2005) Adaptive fit versus robust transformation: how organizations respond to environmental change. J Manag 31(5):738–757. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206305279367CrossRef

Lenzen M, Murray J, Sack F, Wiedmann T (2007) Shared producer and consumer responsibility - theory and practice. Ecol Econ 61(1):27–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.05.018CrossRef

Li Z, Chen Z, Yang N, Wei K, Ling Z, Liu Q, Chen G, Ye BH (2021) Trends in research on the carbon footprint of higher education: a bibliometric analysis (2010–2019). J Clean Prod 289:125642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125642CrossRef

Liao L, Luo L, Tang Q (2015) Gender diversity, board independence, environmental committee and greenhouse gas disclosure. Br Account Rev 47(4):409–424CrossRef

Lim WM, Kumar S, Ali F (2022) Advancing knowledge through literature reviews: “what”, “why”, and “how to contribute”. J Serv Ind J, Forthcomin.

Lindstad H, Asbjørnslett BE, Strømman AH (2011) Reductions in greenhouse gas emissions and cost by shipping at lower speeds. Energy Policy 39(6):3456–3464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.03.044CrossRef

Linnenluecke M, Griffiths A (2010) Beyond adaptation: Resilience for business in light of climate change and weather extremes. Bus Soc 49(3):477–511. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650310368814CrossRef

Linnenluecke M, Griffiths A, Winn MI (2013) Firm and industry adaptation to climate change: a review of climate adaptation studies in the business and management field. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Change 4(5):397–416. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.214CrossRef

López-Fernández MC, Serrano-Bedia AM, Pérez-Pérez M (2016) Entrepreneurship and family firm research: a bibliometric analysis of an emerging field. J Small Bus Manag 54(2):622–639. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12161CrossRef

Mallawaarachchi H, Sandanayake Y, Karunasena G, Liu C (2020) Unveiling the conceptual development of industrial symbiosis: Bibliometric analysis. J Clean Prod 258:120618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120618CrossRef

Masson-Delmotte V, Zhai P, Pörtner HO, Roberts D, Skea J, Shukla PR, Pirani A, Moufouma-Okia W, Péan C, Pidcock R (2019) Intergovernmental panel on climate change, 2019. Press). Available Online: https://www.Ipcc.Ch/Site/Assets/Uploads/Sites/2/2019/06/SR15_Full_Report_High_Res. Pdf (Accessed on 28 Feb 2020).

Mathur J, Bansal NK, Wagner H-J (2003) Investigation of greenhouse gas reduction potential and change in technological selection in Indian power sector. Energy Policy 31(12):1235–1244CrossRef

Matsumura EM, Prakash R, Vera-Muñoz SC (2014) Firm-value effects of carbon emissions and carbon disclosures. Account Rev 89(2):695–724. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50629CrossRef

McCain KW (1991) Mapping economics through the journal literature: an experiment in journal cocitation analysis. J Am Soc Inf Sci 42(4):290CrossRef

McCain KW (1990) Mapping authors in intellectual space: a technical overview. J Am Soc Inf Sci (1986–1998) 41(6):433CrossRef

Michailidou AV, Vlachokostas C, Moussiopoulos N (2016) Interactions between climate change and the tourism sector: multiple-criteria decision analysis to assess mitigation and adaptation options in tourism areas. Tour Manag 55:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2016.01.010CrossRef

Muller A, Kolk A (2010) Extrinsic and intrinsic drivers of corporate social performance: evidence from foreign and domestic firms in Mexico. J Manag Stud 47(1):1–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00855.xCrossRef

Nelson JS (2022) The future of corporate criminal liability: watching the ESG space. JS Nelson, the future of corporate criminal liability: watching the ESG Space, in Edward Elgar research handbook on corporate liability (Forthcoming).

Ng AKY, Wang T, Yang Z, Li KX, Jiang C (2018) How is business adapting to climate change impacts appropriately? Insight from the commercial port sector. J Bus Ethics 150(4):1029–1047. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3179-6CrossRef

O’Brien K, Sygna L (2013) Responding to climate change: the three spheres of transformation. Proc Transform Chang Clim 16:23

Oestreich AM, Tsiakas I (2015) Carbon emissions and stock returns: evidence from the EU emissions trading scheme. J Bank Financ 58:294–308CrossRef

Oliva RDP, Huaman J, Vásquez-Lavin F, Barrientos M, Gelcich S (2022) Firms adaptation to climate change through product innovation. J Clean Prod 350:131436CrossRef

Ostrom E (2012) Nested externalities and polycentric institutions: must we wait for global solutions to climate change before taking actions at other scales? Econ Theor 49(2):353–369CrossRef

Parastuty Z (2018) Systematic review of research on exit: a bibliometric analysis and future directions. Int Rev Entrep 16(4):587–626

Park SK (2021) Legal strategy disrupted: managing climate change and regulatory transformation. Am Bus Law J 58(4):711–749CrossRef

Pinkse J, Gasbarro F (2019) Managing physical impacts of climate change: an attentional perspective on corporate adaptation. Bus Soc 58(2):333–368CrossRef

Pinkse J, Kolk A (2012) Addressing the climate change—sustainable development nexus: the role of multistakeholder partnerships. Bus Soc 51(1):176–210CrossRef

Pisani N, Kourula A, Kolk A, Meijer R (2017) How global is international CSR research? Insights and recommendations from a systematic review. J World Bus 52(5):591–614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2017.05.003CrossRef

Porter ME (1997) New strategies for inner-city economic development. Econ Dev Quart 11(1):11–27CrossRef

Porter ME (1998) New strategies for inner-city economic development: Initiative for a competitive inner city. J Small Bus Strateg 9(2):1–4

Porter ME, Van Der Linde C (1995) Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. J Econ Perspect 9(4):97–118. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.9.4.97CrossRef

Porter ME (2015) The competitive advantage of the inner city. In: the city reader Routledge, pp 358–371.

Prado-Lorenzo J-M, Garcia-Sanchez I-M (2010) The role of the board of directors in disseminating relevant information on greenhouse gases. J Bus Ethics 97(3):391–424CrossRef

Rankin M, Windsor C, Wahyuni D (2011) An investigation of voluntary corporate greenhouse gas emissions reporting in a market governance system: Australian evidence. Account Audit Account J 24:1037CrossRef

Reed MS, Podesta G, Fazey I, Geeson N, Hessel R, Hubacek K, Letson D, Nainggolan D, Prell C, Rickenbach MG, Ritsema C, Schwilch G, Stringer LC, Thomas AD (2013) Combining analytical frameworks to assess livelihood vulnerability to climate change and analyse adaptation options. Ecol Econ 94:66–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.07.007CrossRef

Reid EM, Toffel MW (2009) Responding to public and private politics: corporate disclosure of climate change strategies. Strateg Manag J 30(11):1157–1178CrossRef

Revell A, Stokes D, Chen H (2010) Small businesses and the environment: turning over a new leaf? Bus Strateg Environ 19(5):273–288CrossRef

Rivera J, Clement V (2019) Business adaptation to climate change: American ski resorts and warmer temperatures. Bus Strateg Environ 28(7):1285–1301. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2316CrossRef

Robertson JL, Barling J (2013) Greening organizations through leaders’ influence on employees’ pro-environmental behaviors. J Organ Behav 34(2):176–194CrossRef

Rojas Molina LK, Pérez López JÁ, Campos Lucena MS (2022) Meta-analysis: associated factors for the adoption and disclosure of CSR practices in the banking sector. Manag Rev Quart pp 1–28.

Russo MV, Fouts PA (1997) A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Sour Acad Manag J 40(3):534–559. https://doi.org/10.2307/257052CrossRef

Santos RM, Bakhshoodeh R (2021) Climate change/global warming/climate emergency versus general climate research: comparative bibliometric trends of publications. Heliyon 7(11):e08219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08219CrossRef

Sharma S, Aragón-Correa JA (2005) Corp Environ Strateg Compet Adv

Slawinski N, Bansal P (2015) Short on time: Intertemporal tensions in business sustainability. Organ Sci 26(2):531–549CrossRef

Small H (1973) Co citation in the scientific literature: a new measure of the relationship between two documents related papers. J Am Soc Inf Sci 24(4):265–269CrossRef

Smith S, Swierzbinski J (2007) Assessing the performance of the UK emissions trading scheme. Environ Resour Econ 37(1):131–158CrossRef

Sovacool BK (2011) An international comparison of four polycentric approaches to climate and energy governance. Energy Policy 39(6):3832–3844CrossRef

Sprengel DC, Busch T (2011) Stakeholder engagement and environmental strategy–the case of climate change. Bus Strateg Environ 20(6):351–364CrossRef

Tauringana V, Chithambo L (2015) The effect of DEFRA guidance on greenhouse gas disclosure. Br Account Rev 47(4):425–444CrossRef

Van Asselt H, Biermann F (2007) European emissions trading and the international competitiveness of energy-intensive industries: a legal and political evaluation of possible supporting measures. Energy Policy 35(1):497–506CrossRef

Van Eck NJ, Waltman L (2013) Vosviewer manual. Leiden Univeristeit Leiden 1(1):1–53

Velte P (2021) Meta-analyses on corporate social responsibility (CSR): a literature review. Manag Rev Quart. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-021-00211-2CrossRef

Virtanen T, Tuomaala M, Pentti E (2013) Energy efficiency complexities: a technical and managerial investigation. Manag Account Res 24(4):401–416CrossRef

Waltman L, Van Eck NJ, Noyons ECM (2010) A unified approach to mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks. J Informetr 4(4):629–635CrossRef

Wang Z, Zhao Y, Wang B (2018) A bibliometric analysis of climate change adaptation based on massive research literature data. J Clean Prod 199:1072–1082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.183CrossRef

Winn M, Kirchgeorg M, Griffiths A, Linnenluecke M, Gunther E (2011) Impacts from climate change on organizations: a conceptual foundation. Bus Strateg Environ 20(3):157–173. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.679CrossRef

Wittneben BBF (2009) Exxon is right: let us re-examine our choice for a cap-and-trade system over a carbon tax. Energy Policy 37(6):2462–2464CrossRef

Woldt JJ, Prasad S, Tata J (2019) Supply chain management, national culture, and refugee network performance. J Hum Logist Supply Chain Manag 9(2):109–130. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHLSCM-12-2018-0075WE-EmergingSourcesCitationIndex(ESCI)CrossRef

Wright C, Nyberg D, Grant D (2012) “Hippies on the third floor”: Climate change, narrative identity and the micro-politics of corporate environmentalism. Organ Stud 33(11):1451–1475CrossRef

Yang H, Chen W (2018) Retailer-driven carbon emission abatement with consumer environmental awareness and carbon tax: revenue-sharing versus cost-sharing. Omega 78:179–191CrossRef

Ye N, Kueh TB, Hou L, Liu Y, Yu H (2020) A bibliometric analysis of corporate social responsibility in sustainable development. J Clean Prod 272:122679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122679CrossRef

Yenipazarli A (2016) Managing new and remanufactured products to mitigate environmental damage under emissions regulation. Eur J Oper Res 249(1):117–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.08.020CrossRef

Yoshino N, Taghizadeh-Hesary F, Otsuka M (2021) Covid-19 and optimal portfolio selection for investment in sustainable development goals. Financ Res Lett 38:101695CrossRef

Zhang K, Liang QM (2020) Recent progress of cooperation on climate mitigation: a bibliometric analysis. J Clean Prod 277(5):123495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123495CrossRef

Zupic I, Čater T (2015) Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organ Res Methods 18(3):429–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629CrossRef

Titel: Trends in research on climate change and organizations: a bibliometric analysis (1999–2021)
verfasst von: Julián Andres Díaz Tautiva
Joana Huaman
Roberto D. Ponce Oliva
Publikationsdatum: 29.09.2022
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in: Management Review Quarterly / Ausgabe 1/2024
Print ISSN: 2198-1620
Elektronische ISSN: 2198-1639
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-022-00298-1

Springer Professional

Trends in research on climate change and organizations: a bibliometric analysis (1999–2021)

Abstract

Premium Partner

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2024

A systematic literature review on knowledge management in SMEs: current trends and future directions

What’s age got to do with it? The effect of board member age diversity: a systematic review

Abusive supervision: a systematic literature review

Mapping the research about organisations in the latin american context: a bibliometric analysis

Synthesizing research in entrepreneurial bootstrapping and bricolage: a bibliometric mapping and TCCM analysis

Playing the gamification and co-creation game: a bibliometric literature review

Premium Partner