Abusive supervision: a systematic literature review

Agarwal UA, Avey J, Wu K (2021) How and when abusive supervision influences knowledge hiding behavior: evidence from India. J Knowl Manag 26:209–231. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-10-2020-0789CrossRef

Ahmed Q, Sumbal MS, Akhtar MN, Tariq H (2021) Abusive supervision and the knowledge worker productivity: the mediating role of knowledge management processes. J Knowl Manag 25:2506–2522. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-08-2020-0632CrossRef

Akram Z, Ahmad S, Akram U, Asghar M, Jiang T (2021) Is abusive supervision always harmful toward creativity? Managing workplace stressors by promoting distributive and procedural justice. Int J Confl Manag 33:385–407. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCMA-03-2021-0036CrossRef

Al-Hawari MA, Bani-Melhem S, Quratulain S (2020) Do frontline employees cope effectively with abusive supervision and customer incivility? Testing the effect of employee resilience. J Bus Psychol 35:223–240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-019-09621-2CrossRef

Ambrose ML, Ganegoda DB (2020) Abusive according to whom? Manager and subordinate perceptions of abusive supervision and supervisors’ performance. J Organ Behav. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2472CrossRef

Aryee S, Sun L-Y, Chen ZXG, Debrah YA (2008) Abusive supervision and contextual performance: the mediating role of emotional exhaustion and the moderating role of work unit structure. Manag Organ Rev 4:393–411. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8784.2008.00118.xCrossRef

Atwater L, Kim KY, Witt A, Latheef Z, Callison K, Elkins TJ, Zheng D (2016) Reactions to abusive supervision: examining the roles of emotions and gender in the USA. Int J Hum Resour Manag 27:1874–1899. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2015.1088887CrossRef

Babalola MT, Garcia PRJM, Ren S, Ogunfowora B, Gok K (2022) Stronger together: understanding when and why group ethical voice inhibits group abusive supervision. J Organ Behav 43:386–409. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2582CrossRef

Bai Y, Lu L, Lin-Schilstra L (2022) Auxiliaries to abusive supervisors: the spillover effects of peer mistreatment on employee performance. J Bus Ethics 178:219–237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04768-6CrossRef

Bandura A, Walters RH (1977) Social learning theory. Englewood cliffs Prentice Hall

Barnes CM, Lucianetti L, Bhave DP, Christian MS (2015) “You wouldn’t like me when i’m sleepy”: Leaders’ sleep, daily abusive supervision, and work unit engagement. Acad Manag J 58:1419–1437. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2013.1063CrossRef

Bastardoz N, Van Vugt M (2019) The nature of followership: evolutionary analysis and review. Leadersh Q 30:81–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.09.004CrossRef

Baumeister RF, Bratslavsky E, Muraven M, Tice DM (1998) Ego depletion: is the active self a limited resource? J Pers Soc Psychol 74:1252–1265. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.5.1252CrossRef

Biron M (2010) Negative reciprocity and the association between perceived organizational ethical values and organizational deviance. Hum Relat 63:875–897. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726709347159CrossRef

Blau P (1964) Exchange and power in social life

Breevaart K, de Vries RE (2017) Supervisor’s HEXACO personality traits and subordinate perceptions of abusive supervision. Leadersh Q 28:691–700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.02.001CrossRef

Brehm JW (1972) Responses to loss of freedom: A theory of psychological reactance. General Learning Press

Brunzel J (2021) Overconfidence and narcissism among the upper echelons: a systematic literature review. Manag Rev Q 71:585–623. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-020-00194-6CrossRef

Bryman A (2004) Qualitative research on leadership: a critical but appreciative review. Leadersh Q 15:729–769. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2004.09.007CrossRef

Buckels EE, Jones DN, Paulhus DL (2013) Behavioral confirmation of everyday sadism. Psychol Sci 24:2201–2209. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613490749CrossRef

Byrne A, Dionisi AM, Barling J, Akers A, Robertson J, Lys R, Wylie J, Dupré K (2014) The depleted leader: the influence of leaders’ diminished psychological resources on leadership behaviors. Leadersh Q 25:344–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.09.003CrossRef

Caesens G, Nguyen N, Stinglhamber F (2019) Abusive supervision and organizational dehumanization. J Bus Psychol 34:709–728. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-018-9592-3CrossRef

Camps J, Stouten J, Euwema M, De Cremer D (2020) Abusive supervision as a response to follower hostility: a moderated mediation model. J Bus Ethics 164:495–514. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-4058-0CrossRef

Chan ME, McAllister DJ (2014) Abusive supervision through the lens of employee state paranoia. Acad Manag Rev 39:44–66. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2011.0419CrossRef

Chen S-C, Liu N-T (2019) When and how vicarious abusive supervision leads to bystanders’ supervisor-directed deviance: a moderated–mediation model. Pers Rev 48:1734–1755. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-09-2018-0368CrossRef

Chen C, Qin X, Johnson RE, Huang M, Yang M, Liu S (2021) Entering an upward spiral: Investigating how and when supervisors’ talking about abuse leads to subsequent abusive supervision. J Organ Behav 42:407–428. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2501CrossRef

Chi S-CS, Liang S-G (2013) When do subordinates’ emotion-regulation strategies matter? Abusive supervision, subordinates’ emotional exhaustion, and work withdrawal. Leadersh Q 24:125–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.08.006CrossRef

Chi N-W, Chen Y-C, Huang T-C, Chen S-F (2018) Trickle-down effects of positive and negative supervisor behaviors on service performance: the roles of employee emotional labor and perceived supervisor power. Hum Perform 31:55–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959285.2018.1442470CrossRef

Choi W, Kim SL, Yun S (2019) A social exchange perspective of abusive supervision and knowledge sharing: investigating the moderating effects of psychological contract fulfillment and self-enhancement motive. J Bus Psychol 34:305–319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-018-9542-0CrossRef

Clercq DD, Jahanzeb S, Fatima T (2021) Abusive supervision, occupational well-being and job performance: The critical role of attention–awareness mindfulness: Aust J Manag. https://doi.org/10.1177/03128962211037772

Cole DA, Maxwell SE (2003) Testing mediational models with longitudinal data: questions and tips in the use of structural equation modeling. J Abnorm Psychol 112:558–577. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.112.4.558CrossRef

Collins MD, Jackson CJ (2015) A process model of self-regulation and leadership: How attentional resource capacity and negative emotions influence constructive and destructive leadership. Leadersh Q 26:386–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.02.005CrossRef

Cook KS, Cheshire C, Rice ERW, Nakagawa S (2013) Social exchange theory. In: DeLamater J, Ward A (eds) Handbook of social psychology. Springer, Netherlands, Dordrecht, pp 61–88CrossRef

Courtright SH, Gardner RG, Smith TA, Mccormick BW, Colbert AE (2016) My family made me do it: a cross-domain, self-regulatory perspective on antecedents to abusive supervision. Acad Manag J 59:1630–1652. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2013.1009CrossRef

Carlson D, Ferguson M, Hunter E, Whitten D (2012) Abusive supervision and work–family conflict: the path through emotional labor and burnout. Leadership Quarterly 23:849–859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.05.003CrossRef

Decoster S, Camps J, Stouten J, Vandevyvere L, Tripp TM (2013) Standing by your organization: the impact of organizational identification and abusive supervision on followers’ perceived cohesion and tendency to gossip. J Bus Ethics 118:623–634. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1612-zCrossRef

Detert JR, Treviño LK, Burris ER, Andiappan M (2007) Managerial modes of influence and counterproductivity in organizations: a longitudinal business-unit-level investigation. J Appl Psychol 92:993–1005. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.993CrossRef

Douglas SC, Kiewitz C, Martinko MJ, Harvey P, Kim Y, Chun JU (2008) Cognitions, emotions, and evaluations: an elaboration likelihood model for workplace aggression. AMR 33:425–451. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2008.31193490CrossRef

Duffy MK, Ferrier WJ (2003) Birds of a feather...?: How supervisor-subordinate dissimilarity moderates the influence of supervisor behaviors on workplace attitudes. Group Org Manag 28:217–248. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601103028002003CrossRef

Epitropaki O, Kark R, Mainemelis C, Lord RG (2017) Leadership and followership identity processes: a multilevel review. Leadersh Q 28:104–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.10.003CrossRef

Eschleman KJ, Bowling NA, Michel JS, Burns GN (2014) Perceived intent of supervisor as a moderator of the relationships between abusive supervision and counterproductive work behaviours. Work Stress 28:362–375. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2014.961183CrossRef

Falbe CM, Yukl G (2017) Consequences for managers of using single influence tactics and combinations of tactics. Acad Manag J. https://doi.org/10.5465/256490CrossRef

Fan X-L, Wang Q-Q, Liu J, Liu C, Cai T (2020) Why do supervisors abuse subordinates? Effects of team performance, regulatory focus, and emotional exhaustion. J Occup Organ Psychol 93:605–628. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12307CrossRef

Farmanara P (2019) Abusive supervisory behavior aimed at raising work group performance. J Manag Inq. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492619889687CrossRef

Frieder RE, Hochwarter WA, DeOrtentiis PS (2015) Attenuating the negative effects of abusive supervision: the role of proactive voice behavior and resource management ability. Leadersh Q 26:821–837. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.06.001CrossRef

Foulk TA, Lanaj K, Tu M-H, Erez A, Archambeau L (2018) HHeavy Is the head that wears the crown: an actor-centric approachto daily psychological power, abusive leader behavior, and perceived incivility. AMJ 61:661–684. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2015.1061.CrossRef

Garcia PRJM, Restubog SLD, Kiewitz C, Scott KL, Tang RL (2014) Roots run deep: investigating psychological mechanisms between history of family aggression and abusive supervision. J Appl Psychol 99:883–897. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036463CrossRef

Garcia PRJM, Wang L, Lu V, Kiazad K, Restubog SLD (2015) When victims become culprits: the role of subordinates’ neuroticism in the relationship between abusive supervision and workplace deviance. Person Individ Differ 72:225–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.08.017CrossRef

Gelfand MJ, Nishii LH, Raver JL (2006) On the nature and importance of cultural tightness-looseness. J Appl Psychol 91:1225–1244. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.6.1225CrossRef

Gonzalez-Morales MG, Kernan MC, Becker TE, Eisenberger R (2018) Defeating abusive supervision: training supervisors to support subordinates. J Occup Health Psychol 23:151–162. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000061CrossRef

Goswami A, Nair PK, Grossenbacher MA (2015) Impact of aggressive humor on dysfunctional resistance. Person Individ Differ 74:265–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.10.037CrossRef

Gouldner AW (1960) The norm of reciprocity: a preliminary statement. Am Sociol Rev 25:161–178. https://doi.org/10.2307/2092623CrossRef

Haggard DL, Park HM (2018) Perceived supervisor remorse, abusive supervision, and LMX. J Organ Behav 39:1252–1267. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2285CrossRef

Han GH, Harms PD, Bai Y (2017) Nightmare bosses: the impact of abusive supervision on employees’ sleep, emotions, and creativity. J Bus Ethics 145:21–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2859-yCrossRef

Hao Q, Wei K, Zhang B (2022) How to attenuate the effects of abusive supervision on knowledge hiding: the neutralizing roles of coworker support and individual characteristics. J Knowl Manag Ahead-of-Print. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-02-2021-0167CrossRef

Harvey P, Harris KJ, Gillis WE, Martinko MJ (2014) Abusive supervision and the entitled employee. Leadersh Q 25:204–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.08.001CrossRef

Henle CA, Gross MA (2014) What have i done to deserve this? Effects of employee personality and emotion on abusive supervision. J Bus Ethics 122:461–474. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1771-6CrossRef

Hiller NJ, Sin H-P, Ponnapalli AR, Ozgen S (2019) Benevolence and authority as WEIRDly unfamiliar: a multi-language meta-analysis of paternalistic leadership behaviors from 152 studies. Leadersh Q 30(1):165–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.11.003CrossRef

Hinkin TR (1998) A brief tutorial on the development of measures for use in survey questionnaires. Organ Res Methods 1:104–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442819800100106CrossRef

Harris KJ, Kacmar KM, Zivnuska S (2007) An investigation of abusive supervision as a predictor of performance and the meaning of work as a moderator of the relationship. Leadership Quarterly 18:252–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.03.007CrossRef

Hobfoll SE (1989) Conservation of Resources. Am Psychol 12

Hobfoll SE, Halbesleben J, Neveu J-P, Westman M (2018) Conservation of resources in the organizational context: the reality of resources and their consequences. Annu Rev Organ Psych Organ Behav 5:103–128. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032117-104640CrossRef

Hofstede G (1980) Motivation, leadership, and organization: do American theories apply abroad? Organ Dyn 9:42–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-2616(80)90013-3CrossRef

Hon AHY, Lu L (2016) When will the trickle-down effect of abusive supervision be alleviated? The moderating roles of power distance and traditional cultures. Cornell Ho Quart 57:421–433. https://doi.org/10.1177/1938965515624013CrossRef

Hu L, Liu Y (2017) Abuse for status: a social dominance perspective of abusive supervision. Hum Resour Manag Rev 27:328–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2016.06.002CrossRef

Jahanzeb S, Fatima T, Bouckenooghe D, Bashir F (2019) The knowledge hiding link: a moderated mediation model of how abusive supervision affects employee creativity. Eur J Work Organ Psychol 28:810–819. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2019.1659245CrossRef

Jiang W, Gu Q, Tang TL-P (2019) Do Victims of Supervisor Bullying Suffer from Poor Creativity? Social Cognitive and Social Comparison Perspectives. J Bus Ethics 157:865–884. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3660-xCrossRef

Jin D, Kim K, DiPietro RB (2020) Workplace incivility in restaurants: who’s the real victim? Employee deviance and customer reciprocity. Int J Hosp Manag 86:102459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102459CrossRef

Ju D, Huang M, Liu D, Qin X, Hu Q, Chen C (2019) Supervisory consequences of abusive supervision: an investigation of sense of power, managerial self-efficacy, and task-oriented leadership behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 154:80–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2019.09.003CrossRef

Kaluza AJ, Boer D, Buengeler C, van Dick R (2019) Leadership behaviour and leader self-reported well-being: A review, integration and meta-analytic examination. Work Stress. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2019.1617369CrossRef

Kelemen TK, Matthews SH, Breevaart K (2020) Leading day-to-day: a review of the daily causes and consequences of leadership behaviors. Leadersh Q 31:101344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2019.101344CrossRef

Khalid M, Gulzar A, Karim Khan A (2020) When and how the psychologically entitled employees hide more knowledge? Int J Hosp Manag 89:102413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2019.102413CrossRef

Khan NA, Khan AN (2021) Exploring the impact of abusive supervision on employee’ voice behavior in Chinese construction industry: a moderated mediation analysis. Eng Construct Arch Manag Ahead-of-Print. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-10-2020-0829CrossRef

Khan S, Kiazad K, Sendjaya S, Cooper B (2021) A multilevel model of abusive supervision climate. Person Rev Ahead-of-Print. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-02-2021-0109CrossRef

Khan AK, Hameed I, Quratulain S, Arain GA, Newman A (2022) How the supervisor’s Machiavellianism results in abusive supervision: understanding the role of the supervisor’s competitive worldviews and subordinate’s performance. Person Rev Ahead-of-Print. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-03-2021-0176CrossRef

Kiewitz C, Restubog SLD, Zagenczyk TJ, Scott KD, Garcia PRJM, Tang RL (2012) Sins of the parents: self-control as a buffer between supervisors’ previous experience of family undermining and subordinates’ perceptions of abusive supervision. Leadersh Q 23:869–882. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.05.005CrossRef

Kim SL, Yun S (2015) The effect of coworker knowledge sharing on performance and its boundary conditions: An interactional perspective. J Appl Psychol 100:575–582. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037834CrossRef

Kim SL, Son SY, Yun S (2018) Abusive supervision and knowledge sharing: the moderating role of organizational tenure. Personnel Rev 47:22–38. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-08-2016-0199CrossRef

Kim JK, Holtz BC, Hu B (2020) Rising above: investigating employee exemplification as a response to the experience of shame induced by abusive supervision. J Occupat Organ Psychol. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12327

Kim JK, Harold CM, Holtz BC (2022) Evaluations of abusive supervisors: the moderating role of the abuser’s gender. J Organ Behav 43:465–482. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2581CrossRef

Klaussner S (2013) Engulfed in the abyss: the emergence of abusive supervision as an escalating process of supervisor–subordinate interaction: Hum Relat. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726713493027

Lam CK, Walter F, Huang X (2017) Supervisors’ emotional exhaustion and abusive supervision: The moderating roles of perceived subordinate performance and supervisor self-monitoring. J Organ Behav 38:1151–1166. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2193CrossRef

Lee S, Kim SL, Yun S (2018) A moderated mediation model of the relationship between abusive supervision and knowledge sharing. Leadersh Q 29:403–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.09.001CrossRef

Li Y, Wang Z, Yang L-Q, Liu S (2016) The crossover of psychological distress from leaders to subordinates in teams: the role of abusive supervision, psychological capital, and team performance. J Occup Health Psychol 21:142–153. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039960CrossRef

Li R, Chen Z, Zhang H, Luo J (2019) How do authoritarian leadership and abusive supervision jointly thwart follower proactivity? A social control perspective. J Manag. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206319878261CrossRef

Li A, Liao C, Shao P, Huang J (2022) Angry but not deviant: employees’ prior-day deviant behavior toward the family buffers their reactions to abusive supervisory behavior. J Bus Ethics 177:683–697. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04750-2CrossRef

Lian H, Brown DJ, Ferris DL, Liang LH, Keeping LM, Morrison R (2014a) Abusive supervision and retaliation: a self-control framework. AMJ 57:116–139. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0977CrossRef

Lian H, Ferris DL, Morrison R, Brown DJ (2014b) Blame it on the supervisor or the subordinate? Reciprocal relations between abusive supervision and organizational deviance. J Appl Psychol 99:651–664. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035498CrossRef

Liang LH, Lian H, Brown DJ, Ferris DL, Hanig S, Keeping LM (2016) Why are abusive supervisors abusive? A dual-system self-control model. AMJ 59:1385–1406. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2014.0651CrossRef

Liang LH, Hanig S, Evans R, Brown DJ, Lian H (2018) Why is your boss making you sick? A longitudinal investigation modeling time-lagged relations between abusive supervision and employee physical health. J Organ Behav 39:1050–1065. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2248CrossRef

Liang LH, Coulombe C, Brown DJ, Lian H, Hanig S, Ferris DL, Keeping LM (2022) Can two wrongs make a right? The buffering effect of retaliation on subordinate well-being following abusive supervision. J Occup Health Psychol 27:37–52. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000291CrossRef

Liao Z, Yam KC, Johnson RE, Liu W, Song Z (2018) Cleansing my abuse: A reparative response model of perpetrating abusive supervisor behavior. J Appl Psychol 103:1039–1056. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000319CrossRef

Lin S-H, (Joanna), Ma J, Johnson RE, (2016) When ethical leader behavior breaks bad: How ethical leader behavior can turn abusive via ego depletion and moral licensing. J Appl Psychol 101:815–830. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000098

Lin C-J, Pauleen D, Li C-R (2021) Perceived abusive leadership, narcissistic personality, and employee’s political behaviors: a moderated-mediation model. J Leadersh Organ Stud. https://doi.org/10.1177/15480518211041632CrossRef

Liu X-Y, Wang J (2013) Abusive supervision and organizational citizenship behaviour: is supervisor–subordinate guanxi a mediator? Int J Hum Resour Manag 24:1471–1489. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2012.725082CrossRef

Liu J, Kwong Kwan H, Wu L, Wu W (2010) Abusive supervision and subordinate supervisor-directed deviance: The moderating role of traditional values and the mediating role of revenge cognitions. J Occup Organ Psychol 83:835–856. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317909X485216CrossRef

Liu D, Liao H, Loi R (2012) The dark side of leadership: a three-level investigation of the cascading effect of abusive supervision on employee creativity. Acad Manag J 55:1187–1212. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0400CrossRef

Liu C, Yang J, Liu J, Zhu L (2020) The effect of abusive supervision on employee deviant behaviors: an identity-based perspective. Int J Hum Resour Manag 32:948–978. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2018.1511613CrossRef

Luu TT (2019) Discretionary HR practices and employee well-being: the roles of job crafting and abusive supervision. Pers Rev 49:43–66. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-05-2018-0162CrossRef

Lukacik E-R, Bourdage JS (2019) Exploring the influence of abusive and ethical leadership on supervisor and coworker-targeted Impression management. J Bus Psychol 34:771–789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-018-9593CrossRef

Lyu Y, Zhu H, Zhong H-J, Hu L (2016) Abusive supervision and customer-oriented organizational citizenship behavior: the roles of hostile attribution bias and work engagement. Int J Hosp Manag 53:69–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2015.12.001CrossRef

Lyubykh Z, Bozeman J, Hershcovis MS, Turner N, Shan JV (2022) Employee performance and abusive supervision: the role of supervisor over-attributions. J Organ Behav 43:125–145. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2560CrossRef

Mackey JD, Ellen BP, Hochwarter WA, Ferris GR (2013) Subordinate social adaptability and the consequences of abusive supervision perceptions in two samples. The Leadership Quarterly 24:732–746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.07.003CrossRef

Mackey JD, Frieder RE, Brees JR, Martinko MJ (2017) Abusive supervision: a meta-analysis and empirical review. J Manag 43:1940–1965. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206315573997CrossRef

Mackey JD, McAllister CP, Brees JR, Huang L, Carson JE (2018) Perceived organizational obstruction: a mediator that addresses source–target misalignment between abusive supervision and OCBs. J Organ Behav 39:1283–1295. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2293CrossRef

Mackey JD, Brees JR, McAllister CP, Zorn ML, Martinko MJ, Harvey P (2018a) Victim and culprit? the effects of entitlement and felt accountability on perceptions of abusive supervision and perpetration of workplace bullying. J Bus Ethics 153:659–673. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3348-7CrossRef

Mackey JD, McAllister CP, Brees JR, Huang L, Carson JE (2018b) Perceived organizational obstruction: a mediator that addresses source–target misalignment between abusive supervision and OCBs. J Organizational Behavior 39:1283–1295. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2293CrossRef

Mackey JD, McAllister CP, Alexander KC (2019a) Insubordination: validation of a measure and an examination of insubordinate responses to unethical supervisory treatment. J Bus Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04231-7CrossRef

Mackey JD, McAllister CP, Maher LP, Wang G (2019b) Leaders and followers behaving badly: a meta-analytic examination of curvilinear relationships between destructive leadership and followers’ workplace behaviors. Pers Psychol 72:3–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12286CrossRef

Mackey JD, Huang L, He W (2020) You abuse and i criticize: an ego depletion and leader-member exchange examination of abusive supervision and destructive voice. J Bus Ethics 164:579–591. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-4024-xCrossRef

Mawritz MB, Mayer DM, Hoobler JM, Wayne SJ, Marinova SV (2012) A trickle-down model of abusive supervision. Pers Psychol 65:325–357. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2012.01246.xCrossRef

Mawritz MB, Dust SB, Resick CJ (2014) Hostile climate, abusive supervision, and employee coping: Does conscientiousness matter? J Appl Psychol 99:737–747. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035863CrossRef

Mawritz MB, Greenbaum RL, Butts MM, Graham KA (2017) I just can’t control myself: a self-regulation perspective on the abuse of deviant employees. AMJ 60:1482–1503. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2014.0409CrossRef

McAllister CP, Perrewé PL (2018) About to burst: how state self-regulation affects the enactment of bullying behaviors. J Bus Ethics 153:877–888. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3424-zCrossRef

Meyer RD, Dalal RS, Hermida R (2009) A review and synthesis of situational strength in the organizational sciences. J Manag. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309349309CrossRef

Michel JS, Newness K, Duniewicz K (2016) How abusive supervision affects workplace deviance: a moderated-mediation examination of aggressiveness and work-related negative affect. J Bus Psychol 31:1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-015-9400-2CrossRef

Mitchell MS, Ambrose ML (2007) Abusive supervision and workplace deviance and the moderating effects of negative reciprocity beliefs. J Appl Psychol 92:1159–1168. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.1159CrossRef

Nandkeolyar AK, Shaffer JA, Li A, Ekkirala S, Bagger J (2014) Surviving an abusive supervisor: the joint roles of conscientiousness and coping strategies. J Appl Psychol 99:138–150. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034262CrossRef

Napa Scollon C, Prieto C-K, Diener E (2009) Experience sampling: promises and pitfalls, strength and weaknesses. In: Diener E, Diener E (eds) Assessing well-being: the collected works of Ed. Diener. Dordrecht, pp 157–180

Ng K, Franken E, Nguyen D, Teo S (2022) Job satisfaction and public service motivation in Australian nurses: the effects of abusive supervision and workplace bullying. Int J Hum Resour Manag. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2022.2070715CrossRef

Oc B (2018) Contextual leadership: a systematic review of how contextual factors shape leadership and its outcomes. Leadersh Q 29:218–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.12.004CrossRef

Ogunfowora B (2013) When the abuse is unevenly distributed: the effects of abusive supervision variability on work attitudes and behaviors. J Organ Behav 34:1105–1123. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1841CrossRef

Oh I-S, Charlier SD, Mount MK, Berry CM (2014) The two faces of high self-monitors: chameleonic moderating effects of self-monitoring on the relationships between personality traits and counterproductive work behaviors. J Organ Behav 35:92–111. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1856CrossRef

Ouyang K, Lam W, Wang W (2015) Roles of gender and identification on abusive supervision and proactive behavior. Asia Pacific J Manag 32:671–691. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-015-9410-7CrossRef

Park H, Hoobler JM, Wu J, Liden RC, Hu J, Wilson MS (2019) Abusive Supervision and Employee Deviance: A Multifoci Justice Perspective. J Bus Ethics 158(4):1113–1131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3749-2CrossRef

Peltokorpi V, Ramaswami A (2020) Abusive supervision and subordinates’ physical and mental health: the effects of job satisfaction and power distance orientation. Int J Hum Resour Manag 32:893–919. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2018.1511617CrossRef

Peng AC, Schaubroeck JM, Li Y (2014) Social exchange implications of own and coworkers’ experiences of supervisory abuse. AMJ 57:1385–1405. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2012.0080CrossRef

Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Podsakoff NP (2012) Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annu Rev Psychol 63:539–569. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452CrossRef

Pradhan S, Srivastava A, Jena LK (2019) Abusive supervision and intention to quit: exploring multi-mediational approaches. Pers Rev 49:1269–1286. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-12-2018-0496CrossRef

Priesemuth M, Schminke M, Ambrose ML, Folger R (2014) Abusive supervision climate: a multiple-mediation model of its impact on group outcomes. Acad Manag J 57:1513–1534. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0237CrossRef

Priesemuth M, Schminke M, Bigelow B, Mitchell M (2022) A light at the end of the tunnel: how the right workplace structure can help disrupt the negative impact of abusive supervision. Hum Perform 35:71–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959285.2021.2023875CrossRef

Pundt A, Schwarzbeck K (2018) Abusive supervision from an integrated self-control perspective. Appl Psychol Int Rev 67:473–497. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12125CrossRef

Qin X, Huang M, Johnson RE, Hu Q, Ju D (2017) The short-lived benefits of abusive supervisory behavior for actors: an investigation of recovery and work engagement. AMJ 61:1951–1975. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2016.1325CrossRef

Rafferty AE, Restubog SLD (2011) The influence of abusive supervisors on followers’ organizational citizenship behaviours: the hidden costs of abusive supervision: hidden costs of abusive supervision. Br J Manag 22:270–285. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2010.00732.xCrossRef

Rafferty AE, Restubog SLD, Jimmieson NL (2010) Losing sleep: examining the cascading effects of supervisors’ experience of injustice on subordinates’ psychological health. Work Stress 24:36–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678371003715135CrossRef

Restubog SLD, Scott KL, Zagenczyk TJ (2011) When distress hits home: the role of contextual factors and psychological distress in predicting employees’ responses to abusive supervision. J Appl Psychol 96:713–729. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021593CrossRef

Rice DB, Taylor R, Forrester JK (2020) The unwelcoming experience of abusive supervision and the impact of leader characteristics: turning employees into poor organizational citizens and future quitters. Eur J Work Organ Psychol 29:601–618. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2020.1737521CrossRef

Rousseau V, Aubé C (2018) When leaders stifle innovation in work teams: the role of abusive supervision. J Bus Ethics 151:651–664. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3258-8CrossRef

Schaubroeck JM, Peng AC, Hannah ST (2016) The role of peer respect in linking abusive supervision to follower outcomes: dual moderation of group potency. J Appl Psychol 101:267–278. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000050CrossRef

Shao P, Li A, Mawritz M (2018) Self-protective reactions to peer abusive supervision: The moderating role of prevention focus and the mediating role of performance instrumentality. J Organ Behav 39:12–25. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2206CrossRef

Shen W, Liang LH, Brown DJ, Ni D, Zheng X (2021) Subordinate poor performance as a stressor on leader well-being: The mediating role of abusive supervision and the moderating role of motives for abuse. J Occup Health Psychol 26:491–506. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000307CrossRef

Shoss MK, Eisenberger R, Restubog SLD, Zagenczyk TJ (2013) Blaming the organization for abusive supervision: the roles of perceived organizational support and supervisor’s organizational embodiment. J Appl Psychol 98:158–168. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030687CrossRef

Stamkou E, van Kleef GA, Homan AC, Gelfand MJ, van de Vijver FJR, van Egmond MC, Boer D, Phiri N, Ayub N, Kinias Z, Cantarero K, Efrat Treister D, Figueiredo A, Hashimoto H, Hofmann EB, Lima RP, Lee I-C (2019) Cultural collectivism and tightness moderate responses to norm violators: effects on power perception, moral emotions, and leader support. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 45:947–964. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167218802832CrossRef

Stentz JE, Plano Clark VL, Matkin GS (2012) Applying mixed methods to leadership research: a review of current practices. Leadersh Q 23:1173–1183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.10.001CrossRef

Tajfel H (1982) Social psychology of intergroup relations. Annu Rev Psychol 33:1. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.33.020182.000245CrossRef

Tajfel H, Turner JC (2004) The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In: Political Psychology. Psychology Press

Tajfel H, Turner JC, Austin WG, Worchel S (1979) An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. Organ Ident Reader 56:9780203505984–16

Tariq H, Ding D (2018) Why am i still doing this job? The examination of family motivation on employees’ work behaviors under abusive supervision. Pers Rev 47:378–402. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-07-2016-0162CrossRef

Taylor SG, Griffith MD, Vadera AK, Folger R, Letwin CR (2019) Breaking the cycle of abusive supervision: How disidentification and moral identity help the trickle-down change course. J Appl Psychol 104:164–182. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000360CrossRef

Tee EYJ, Paulsen N, Ashkanasy NM (2013) Revisiting followership through a social identity perspective: the role of collective follower emotion and action. The Leadership Quarterly 24:902–918. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.10.002CrossRef

Tepper BJ (2000) Consequences of abusive supervision. AMJ 43:178–190. https://doi.org/10.5465/1556375CrossRef

Tepper BJ (2007) Abusive supervision in work organizations: review, synthesis, and research agenda. J Manag 33:261–289. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206307300812CrossRef

Tepper BJ, Carr JC, Breaux DM, Geider S, Hu C, Hua W (2009) Abusive supervision, intentions to quit, and employees’ workplace deviance: a power/dependence analysis. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 109:156–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2009.03.004CrossRef

Tepper BJ, Simon L, Park HM (2017) Abusive supervision. Annu Rev Organ Psych Organ Behav 4(1):123–152. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-041015-062539CrossRef

Thau S, Mitchell MS (2010) Self-gain or self-regulation impairment? Tests of competing explanations of the supervisor abuse and employee deviance relationship through perceptions of distributive justice. J Appl Psychol 95:1009–1031. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020540CrossRef

Thau S, Bennett RJ, Mitchell MS, Marrs MB (2009) How management style moderates the relationship between abusive supervision and workplace deviance: an uncertainty management theory perspective. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 108:79–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2008.06.003CrossRef

Tröster C, Quaquebeke NV (2021) When victims help their abusive supervisors: the role of Lmx, self-blame, and guilt. Acad Manag J 64:1793–1815. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2019.0559CrossRef

Tu M-H, Bono JE, Shum C, LaMontagne L (2018) Breaking the cycle: the effects of role model performance and ideal leadership self-concepts on abusive supervision spillover. J Appl Psychol 103:689–702. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000297CrossRef

Uhl-Bien M, Riggio RE, Lowe KB, Carsten MK (2014) Followership theory: a review and research agenda. Leadersh Q 25:83–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.11.007CrossRef

Van Scotter JR (2020) Narcissism in CEO research: a review and replication of the archival approach. Manag Rev Q 70:629–674. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-019-00178-1CrossRef

Vogel RM, Mitchell MS (2017) The motivational effects of diminished self-esteem for employees who experience abusive supervision. J Manag 43:2218–2251. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314566462CrossRef

Vogel RM, Mitchell MS, Tepper BJ, Restubog SLD, Hu C, Hua W, Huang J-C (2015) A cross-cultural examination of subordinates’ perceptions of and reactions to abusive supervision. J Organ Behav 36:720–745. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1984CrossRef

Walter F, Lam CK, van der Vegt GS, Huang X, Miao Q (2015) Abusive supervision and subordinate performance: instrumentality considerations in the emergence and consequences of abusive supervision. J Appl Psychol 100:1056–1072. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038513CrossRef

Wang G, Van Iddekinge CH, Zhang L, Bishoff J (2019) Meta-analytic and primary investigations of the role of followers in ratings of leadership behavior in organizations. J Appl Psychol 104(1):70–106. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000345CrossRef

Wang I-A, Lin S-Y, Chen Y-S, Wu S-T (2021) The influences of abusive supervision on job satisfaction and mental health: the path through emotional labor. Pers Rev 51:823–838. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-11-2018-0465CrossRef

Wang Y, Zhou M, Zhu H, Wu X (2022) The impact of abusive supervision differentiation on team performance in team competitive climates. Person Rev Ahead-of-Print. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-04-2021-0281CrossRef

Wee EXM, Liao H, Liu D, Liu J (2017) Moving from abuse to reconciliation: a power-dependence perspective on when and how a follower can break the spiral of abuse. AMJ 60:2352–2380. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2015.0866CrossRef

Wheeler AR, Halbesleben JRB, Whitman MV (2013) The interactive effects of abusive supervision and entitlement on emotional exhaustion and co-worker abuse. J Occup Organ Psychol 86:477–496. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12034CrossRef

Whitman MV, Halbesleben JRB, Holmes O (2014) Abusive supervision and feedback avoidance: the mediating role of emotional exhaustion: abuse, exhaustion, and feedback avoidance. J Organ Behav 35:38–53. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1852CrossRef

Wisse B, Sleebos E (2016) When the dark ones gain power: Perceived position power strengthens the effect of supervisor Machiavellianism on abusive supervision in work teams. Person Individ Differ 99:122–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.05.019CrossRef

Wright RA, Brehm SS (1982) Reactance as impression management: a critical review. J Pers Soc Psychol 42:608–618. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.42.4.608CrossRef

Xu E, Huang X, Lam CK, Miao Q (2012) Abusive supervision and work behaviors: the mediating role of LMX. J Organ Behav 33:531–543. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.768CrossRef

Xu AJ, Loi R, Lam LW (2015) The bad boss takes it all: how abusive supervision and leader–member exchange interact to influence employee silence. Leadersh Q 26:763–774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.03.002CrossRef

Xu Q, Zhao Y, Xi M, Li F (2020) Abusive supervision, high-performance work systems, and subordinate silence. Personnel Review ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-01-2019-0029CrossRef

Xu F, Hsu C, Luo X, Warkentin M (2022) Reactions to abusive supervision: neutralization and IS misuse. J Comput Inform Syst 62:632–641. https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2021.1887776CrossRef

Yam KC, Fehr R, Keng-Highberger FT, Klotz AC, Reynolds SJ (2016) Out of control: A self-control perspective on the link between surface acting and abusive supervision. J Appl Psychol 101:292–301. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000043CrossRef

Yang L-Q, Zheng X, Liu X, Lu C, Schaubroeck JM (2019) Abusive supervision, thwarted belongingness, and workplace safety: a group engagement perspective. J Appl Psychol. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000436CrossRef

Yu L, Duffy MK (2020) The whiplash effect: The (moderating) role of attributed motives in emotional and behavioral reactions to abusive supervision. J Appl Psychol. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000810CrossRef

Yu K, Lin W, Wang L, Ma J, Wei W, Wang H, Guo W, Shi J (2016) The role of affective commitment and future work self salience in the abusive supervision–job performance relationship. J Occup Organ Psychol 89:28–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12101CrossRef

Yu L, Duffy MK, Tepper BJ (2018) Consequences of downward envy: a model of self-esteem threat, abusive supervision, and supervisory leader self-improvement. Acad Manag J 61:2296–2318. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2015.0183CrossRef

Yukl G, Tracey JB (1992) Consequences of influence tactics used with subordinates, peers, and the boss. J Appl Psychol 77:525–535. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.77.4.525CrossRef

Zellars KL, Tepper BJ, Duffy MK (2002) Abusive supervision and subordinates’ organizational citizenship behavior. J Appl Psychol 87:1068–1076. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1068CrossRef

Zhang J, Liu J (2018) Is abusive supervision an absolute devil? Literature review and research agenda. Asia Pac J Manag 35:719–744. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-017-9551-yCrossRef

Zhang H, Kwan HK, Zhang X, Wu L-Z (2014) High core self-evaluators maintain creativity: a motivational model of abusive supervision. J Manag 40:1151–1174. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206312460681CrossRef

Zhang Y, Liu X, Chen W (2019a) Fight and flight: a contingency model of third parties’ approach-avoidance reactions to peer abusive supervision. J Bus Psychol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-019-09650-xCrossRef

Zhang Y, Liu X, Xu S, Yang L-Q, Bednall TC (2019b) Why abusive supervision impacts employee ocb and cwb: a meta-analytic review of competing mediating mechanisms. J Manag 45(6):2474–2497. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206318823935CrossRef

Zhu J, Song LJ, Zhu L, Johnson RE (2019) Visualizing the landscape and evolution of leadership research. Leadersh Q 30:215–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.06.003CrossRef

Springer Professional

Abusive supervision: a systematic literature review

Abstract

Premium Partner

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2024

Scarcity in today´s consumer markets: scoping the research landscape by author keywords

Playing the gamification and co-creation game: a bibliometric literature review

Nonprofit capacity and social performance: mapping the field and future directions

Trends in research on climate change and organizations: a bibliometric analysis (1999–2021)

Multinationality and systematic risk: a literature review and meta-analysis

A systematic literature review on knowledge management in SMEs: current trends and future directions

Premium Partner