nach oben

TechTrends

Erschienen in:

15.06.2018 | Original Paper

A Methodological Case Study with Mobile Eye-Tracking of Child Interaction in a Science Museum

verfasst von: Yong Ju Jung, Heather Toomey Zimmerman, Koraly Pérez-Edgar

Erschienen in: TechTrends | Ausgabe 5/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

The field of instructional design and technology (IDT) aims to understand the interactions occurring among people and learning resources during educational experiences to inform design. This article illustrates the utility of mobile eye-tracking for research with children as a tool for IDT researchers and practitioners. Mobile eye-tracking can collect precise information concerning the learners’ visual attention and interactions in authentic environments, unlike traditional eye-tracking using a laboratory or stationary computer. Mobile eye-tracking also can be used effectively in out-of-school settings where learners walk around and interact with diverse resources. By presenting a qualitative interaction analysis, we illuminate how mobile eye-tracking supports investigating explorations in a hands-on museum. The analysis shows patterns of visual and bodily interactions with exhibits and with family members. Implications include how mobile eye-tracking can contribute to a researcher’s understanding of the child’s idiosyncratic viewpoint to examine in detail learners’ interactions and educational resources’ affordances at various educational settings.

Vorheriger Artikel Tweet, and We Shall Find: Using Digital Methods to Locate Participants in Educational Hashtags

Nächster Artikel Ecologically Valid Assessments of Attention and Learning Engagement in Media Multitaskers

Armstrong, T., & Olatunji, B. O. (2012). Eye tracking of attention in the affective disorders: A meta-analytic review and synthesis. Clinical Psychology Review, 32(8), 704–723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2012.09.004.CrossRef

Bell, P., Lewenstein, B., Shouse, A. W., & Feder, M. A. (Eds.). (2009). Learning sciences in informal environments: People, places, and pursuits. Washington DC: National Academic Press.

Bulling, A., & Gellersen, H. (2010). Toward mobile eye-based human-computer interaction. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 9(4), 8–12. https://doi.org/10.1109/MPRV.2010.86.CrossRef

Eghbal-Azar, K., & Widlock, T. (2012). Potentials and limitations of mobile eye tracking in visitor studies: Evidence from field research at two museum exhibitions in Germany. Social Science Computer Review, 31(1), 103–118. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439312453565.CrossRef

Foulsham, T., Walker, E., & Kingstone, A. (2011). The where, what and when of gaze allocation in the lab and the natural environment. Vision Research, 51(17), 1920–1931. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2011.07.002.CrossRef

Fu, X. (2018). Threat-related attention in socioemotional development: A multimodal eye-tracking approach to examine stationary and ambulatory attention. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The Pennsylvania State University, University Park.

Hyönä, J. (2010). The use of eye movements in the study of multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction, 20(2), 172–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.02.013.CrossRef

Isaacowitz, D. M., Livingstone, K. M., Harris, J. A., & Marcotte, S. L. (2015). Mobile eye tracking reveals little evidence for age differences in attentional selection for mood regulation. Emotion, 15(2), 151–161.CrossRef

Jordan, B., & Henderson, A. (1995). Interaction analysis: Foundations and practice. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(1), 39–103. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0401_2.CrossRef

Kassner, M., Patera, W., & Bulling, A. (2014). Pupil: an open source platform for pervasive eye tracking and mobile gaze-based interaction. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (pp.1161–1160). Adjunct Publication. https://doi.org/10.1145/2638728.2641695

Kiili, K., & Ketamo, H. (2010). Eye-tracking in educational game design. In B. Meyer (Ed.), Proceedings of the 4th European Conference on Games Based Learning (pp. 160–167). Copenhagen, Denmark: Academic Publishing Limited.

Land, S. M., & Zimmerman, H. T. (2015). Socio-technical dimensions of an outdoor mobile learning environment: A three-phase design-based research investigation. Educational Technology Research and Development, 63(2), 229–255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-015-9369-6.CrossRef

Manches, A. (2013). Emerging technologies for young children: Evaluating the learning benefits of new forms of interaction. In R. Luckin, S. Puntambekar, P. Goodyear, B. Gravbowski, J. Underwood & N. Winters (Eds.), Handbook of design in educational technology (pp. 425–438). New York, NY: Routledge.

Mayr, E., Knipfer, K., & Wessel, D. (2009). In-sights into mobile learning: an exploration of mobile eye tracking methodology for learning in museums. In G. Vavoula, N. Pachler, & A. Kukulska-Hulme (Eds.), Researching mobile learning: Frameworks, tools and research designs (pp. 189–204). Oxford, England: Peter Lang.

Morales, S., Fu, X., & Pérez-Edgar, K. E. (2016). A developmental neuroscience perspective on affect-biased attention. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 21, 26–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2016.08.001.CrossRef

Morales, S., Taber-Thomas, B. C., & Pérez-Edgar, K. (2017). Patterns of attention to threat across tasks in behaviorally inhibited children at risk for anxiety. Developmental Science, 20(2), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12391.CrossRef

Norman, D. (1988). The psychology of everyday things. Arizona: Basic Books.

Ozcelik, E., Arslan-Ari, I., & Cagiltay, K. (2010). Why does signaling enhance multimedia learning? Evidence from eye movements. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(1), 110–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2009.09.001.CrossRef

Pea, R. D. (2004). The social and technological dimensions of scaffolding and related theoretical concepts for learning, education, and human activity. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(3), 423–451.CrossRef

Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124(3), 372–422. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.124.3.372.CrossRef

Romero-Hall, E., Watson, G. S., Adcock, A., Bliss, J., & Adams Tufts, K. (2016). Simulated environments with animated agents: Effects on visual attention, emotion, performance, and perception. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32(4), 360–373. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12138.CrossRef

Sandifer, C. (2003). Technological novelty and open-endedness: Two characteristics of interactive exhibits that contribute to the holding of visitor attention in a science museum. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(2), 121–137. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10068.CrossRef

Smith, B. (2014). Bodystorming mobile learning experiences. TechTrends, 58(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-013-0723-4.pdf.

Stauffer, E. (2017). TechTrends 2010-2015: A content analysis. TechTrends, 61(2), 147–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0132-6.CrossRef

van Gog, T., & Scheiter, K. (2010). Eye tracking as a tool to study and enhance multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction, 20(2), 95–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.02.009.CrossRef

Yoon, S., & Wang, J. (2014). Making the invisible visible in science museums through augmented reality devices. TechTrends, 58(1), 49–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-013-0720-7

Zimmerman, H. T., & Land, S. M. (2014). Facilitating place-based learning in outdoor informal environments with mobile computers. TechTrends, 58(1), 77–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-013-0724-3.CrossRef

Titel: A Methodological Case Study with Mobile Eye-Tracking of Child Interaction in a Science Museum
verfasst von: Yong Ju Jung
Heather Toomey Zimmerman
Koraly Pérez-Edgar
Publikationsdatum: 15.06.2018
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: TechTrends / Ausgabe 5/2018
Print ISSN: 8756-3894
Elektronische ISSN: 1559-7075
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-018-0310-9

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2018

Q Methodology and Q-Perspectives® Online: Innovative Research Methodology and Instructional Technology

Public Internet Data Mining Methods in Instructional Design, Educational Technology, and Online Learning Research

It’s Not ‘Hippies Running Barefoot Through a Field of Daisies’ and Other Contemplations on Creativity with Dr. Jonathan Plucker

The Graduate Student Assembly: Pathways to Leadership

Critical CinéEthnographic Methods: a New Dimension for Capturing the Experience of Learning in Twenty-First Century Qualitative Research

Jump into Leadership Using our Knowledge of Design!