Skip to main content
Erschienen in: TechTrends 5/2018

23.06.2018 | Original Paper

Q Methodology and Q-Perspectives® Online: Innovative Research Methodology and Instructional Technology

verfasst von: Brandy Brown Walker, Yuhan Lin, Richard M. McCline

Erschienen in: TechTrends | Ausgabe 5/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Q methodology is an underutilized research methodology in the fields of education, instructional design and instructional technology, yet is well suited to research on perceptions of learning, efficacy of design, technology adoption and other issues within those fields. One reason for its lack of widespread use is the somewhat cumbersome nature of the research process, including the lack of readily available mainstream tools to conduct data collection and analysis. The authors introduce Q methodology, discuss its relevance in educational and instructional technology research and introduce their design of a new tool, Q-Perspectives® Online (Walker et al. 2017). The authors provide examples of the how Q-Perspectives® Online makes Q methodology more accessible as an instructional tool, and provide examples of use in face-to-face, flipped and online classrooms. The authors also describe how the methodology and real-time analysis tool provide an opportunity to bridge the research/practitioner divide by creating an explicit merger of the learning and research environments.
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Berkhout, J. J., Teunissen, P. W., Helmich, E., van Exel, J., van der Vleuten, C. P., & Jaarsma, D. A. (2017). Patterns in clinical students’ self-regulated learning behavior: A Q-methodology study. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 22(1), 105–121.CrossRef Berkhout, J. J., Teunissen, P. W., Helmich, E., van Exel, J., van der Vleuten, C. P., & Jaarsma, D. A. (2017). Patterns in clinical students’ self-regulated learning behavior: A Q-methodology study. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 22(1), 105–121.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Brown, S. R. (1980). Political subjectivity: Applications of Q methodology in political science. New Haven: Yale University Press. Brown, S. R. (1980). Political subjectivity: Applications of Q methodology in political science. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Brown, S. R. (1993). A primer on Q methodology. Operant Subjectivity, 16(3/4), 91–138. Brown, S. R. (1993). A primer on Q methodology. Operant Subjectivity, 16(3/4), 91–138.
Zurück zum Zitat dit Dariel, O. P., Wharrad, H., & Windle, R. (2010). Developing Q methodology to explore staff views toward the use of technology in nurse education. Nurse Researcher, 18(1), 58–71.CrossRef dit Dariel, O. P., Wharrad, H., & Windle, R. (2010). Developing Q methodology to explore staff views toward the use of technology in nurse education. Nurse Researcher, 18(1), 58–71.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Good, J. M. M. (2010). Introduction to William Stephenson’s quest for a science of subjectivity. Psychoanalysis and History, 12, 211–243.CrossRef Good, J. M. M. (2010). Introduction to William Stephenson’s quest for a science of subjectivity. Psychoanalysis and History, 12, 211–243.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hock, T. T., Tarmizi, R. A., Yunus, A. S. M., & Ayub, A. F. (2015). Understanding the primary school students’ van Hiele levels of geometry thinking in learning shapes and spaces: A Q-methodology. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 11(4), 793–802. Hock, T. T., Tarmizi, R. A., Yunus, A. S. M., & Ayub, A. F. (2015). Understanding the primary school students’ van Hiele levels of geometry thinking in learning shapes and spaces: A Q-methodology. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 11(4), 793–802.
Zurück zum Zitat Kopcha, T. J., Rieber, L. P., & Walker, B. B. (2016). Understanding university faculty perceptions about innovation in teaching and technology. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(5), 945–957.CrossRef Kopcha, T. J., Rieber, L. P., & Walker, B. B. (2016). Understanding university faculty perceptions about innovation in teaching and technology. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(5), 945–957.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat McKeown, B. (2001). Loss of meaning in Likert scaling: A note on the Q methodological alternative. Operant Subjectivity, 24, 201–206. McKeown, B. (2001). Loss of meaning in Likert scaling: A note on the Q methodological alternative. Operant Subjectivity, 24, 201–206.
Zurück zum Zitat McPherson, K. E., Sanders, M. R., Schroeter, B., Troy, V., & Wiseman, K. (2016). Acceptability and feasibility of peer assisted supervision and support for intervention practitioners: A Q-methodology evaluation. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 25(3), 720–732.CrossRef McPherson, K. E., Sanders, M. R., Schroeter, B., Troy, V., & Wiseman, K. (2016). Acceptability and feasibility of peer assisted supervision and support for intervention practitioners: A Q-methodology evaluation. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 25(3), 720–732.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Morrison, E., & Wagner, W. (2017). Exploring faculty perspectives on community engaged scholarship: The case for Q methodology. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 23(1). Morrison, E., & Wagner, W. (2017). Exploring faculty perspectives on community engaged scholarship: The case for Q methodology. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 23(1).
Zurück zum Zitat Newman, I., & Ramlo, S. (2010). Using Q methodology and Q factor analysis in mixed methods research. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (2nd ed., pp. 505–530). Thousand Oaks: Sage.CrossRef Newman, I., & Ramlo, S. (2010). Using Q methodology and Q factor analysis in mixed methods research. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (2nd ed., pp. 505–530). Thousand Oaks: Sage.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Paige, J. B., & Morin, K. H. (2015). Using Q-methodology to reveal nurse educators’ perspectives about simulation design. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 11(1), 11–19. Paige, J. B., & Morin, K. H. (2015). Using Q-methodology to reveal nurse educators’ perspectives about simulation design. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 11(1), 11–19.
Zurück zum Zitat Pruslow, J. T., & Owl, R. R. (2012). Demonstrating the application of Q methodology for fieldwork reporting in experiential education. The Journal of Experimental Education, 35(2), 375–392.CrossRef Pruslow, J. T., & Owl, R. R. (2012). Demonstrating the application of Q methodology for fieldwork reporting in experiential education. The Journal of Experimental Education, 35(2), 375–392.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ramlo, S. (2016). Mixed method lessons learned from 80 years of Q methodology. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 10(1), 28–45. Ramlo, S. (2016). Mixed method lessons learned from 80 years of Q methodology. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 10(1), 28–45.
Zurück zum Zitat Rieber, L. (2016, November). Adapting the Q sort research methodology for instructional purposes. In E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (pp. 222–227). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Rieber, L. (2016, November). Adapting the Q sort research methodology for instructional purposes. In E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (pp. 222–227). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
Zurück zum Zitat Roberts, R., & Montgomery, D. (2017). Using epistemological positions and orientations to instruction to explore school-based, agricultural Educators' perceptual identities: A Q-sort study. Journal of Agricultural Education, 58(1). Roberts, R., & Montgomery, D. (2017). Using epistemological positions and orientations to instruction to explore school-based, agricultural Educators' perceptual identities: A Q-sort study. Journal of Agricultural Education, 58(1).
Zurück zum Zitat Schmolck, P., & Atkinson, J. (2014). PQMethod software. Schmolck, P., & Atkinson, J. (2014). PQMethod software.
Zurück zum Zitat Stenner, P. (2011). Q methodology as qualiquantology: Comment on “Q methodology and its position in the mixed methods continuum.” Operant. Subjectivity, 34(3), 192–208. Stenner, P. (2011). Q methodology as qualiquantology: Comment on “Q methodology and its position in the mixed methods continuum.” Operant. Subjectivity, 34(3), 192–208.
Zurück zum Zitat Stephenson, W. (1953). The study of behavior: Q-technique and its methodology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Stephenson, W. (1953). The study of behavior: Q-technique and its methodology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Stephenson, W. (1986). Protoconcursus: The concourse theory of communication. Operant Subjectivity, 9(2), 37–58. Stephenson, W. (1986). Protoconcursus: The concourse theory of communication. Operant Subjectivity, 9(2), 37–58.
Zurück zum Zitat Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2009). Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences. Thousand Oaks: Sage. Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2009). Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Zurück zum Zitat Walker, B. B., & McCline, R. M. (2015). Q-perspectives®: Leadership Edition. University of Georgia Research Foundation, Inc. Walker, B. B., & McCline, R. M. (2015). Q-perspectives®: Leadership Edition. University of Georgia Research Foundation, Inc.
Zurück zum Zitat Walker, B. B., & Tamin, S. (2017). Identifying philosophies of curriculum leadership using Q-perspectives® online. International Association for Educational Communication and Technology (AECT), Jacksonville, FL. Walker, B. B., & Tamin, S. (2017). Identifying philosophies of curriculum leadership using Q-perspectives® online. International Association for Educational Communication and Technology (AECT), Jacksonville, FL.
Zurück zum Zitat Watts, S., & Stenner, P. (2012). Doing Q methodological research: Theory, method & interpretation. Thousand Oaks: Sage. Watts, S., & Stenner, P. (2012). Doing Q methodological research: Theory, method & interpretation. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Zurück zum Zitat Young, J. M., & Shepardson, D. P. (2018). Using Q methodology to investigate undergraduate students’ attitudes toward the geosciences. Science Education, 102(1), 195–214.CrossRef Young, J. M., & Shepardson, D. P. (2018). Using Q methodology to investigate undergraduate students’ attitudes toward the geosciences. Science Education, 102(1), 195–214.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Zabala, A. (2014). Qmethod: A package to explore human perspectives using Q methodology. The R Journal, 6(2), 163–173. Zabala, A. (2014). Qmethod: A package to explore human perspectives using Q methodology. The R Journal, 6(2), 163–173.
Metadaten
Titel
Q Methodology and Q-Perspectives® Online: Innovative Research Methodology and Instructional Technology
verfasst von
Brandy Brown Walker
Yuhan Lin
Richard M. McCline
Publikationsdatum
23.06.2018
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
TechTrends / Ausgabe 5/2018
Print ISSN: 8756-3894
Elektronische ISSN: 1559-7075
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-018-0314-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2018

TechTrends 5/2018 Zur Ausgabe