nach oben

Universal Access in the Information Society

Erschienen in:

26.10.2015 | Long paper

Acceptance tests for validating ARIA requirements in widgets

verfasst von: Willian Massami Watanabe, Renata P. M. Fortes, Ana Luiza Dias

Erschienen in: Universal Access in the Information Society | Ausgabe 1/2017

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Accessibility refers to a quality requirement for web applications. However, current accessibility automatic evaluation tools cannot evaluate dynamic generated content that characterizes Ajax applications and RIAs. In this context, this paper describes an approach for evaluating Accessible Rich Internet Applications (ARIA) requirements, by using acceptance tests. The authors implemented a set of disabled user interaction scenarios as acceptance tests in order to verify keyboard accessibility in RIA and automatically evaluate ARIA conformance in widgets. The inclusion of disabled user interaction scenarios in the evaluation process is necessary to analyse ARIA requirements since dynamic changes are accommodated in the DOM structure. Two evaluation tool prototypes were developed and validated in separate case studies. The results show evidence that the proposed evaluation approach is capable of evaluating ARIA conformance in RIA widgets.

Vorheriger Artikel New challenges in web accessibility

Nächster Artikel How to present more readable text for people with dyslexia

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

http://www.sidar.org/hera/index.php.en.

http://www.dasilva.org.br/.

http://bluefish.openoffice.nl/.

http://www.adobe.com/products/dreamweaver/.

https://github.com/heynemann/pyccuracy/wiki.

http://web.archive.org/web/20130313020931/http://news.yahoo.com/.

http://www.welie.com/patterns/showPattern.php?patternID=fly-out-menu.

http://www.welie.com/patterns.

https://github.com/watinha/Pyccuracy-Accessibility-Actions/tree/master/tests/pyccuracy_tests/fixtures/templates.

http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/tools/complete.

http://github.com/watinha/aria-check.

http://www.w3.org/TR/wai-aria/roles#tab.

http://www.w3.org/TR/wai-aria/roles#tooltip.

http://www.w3.org/TR/wai-aria/roles#alert.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/developers/docs/sdk/latest/.

http://pivotal.github.com/jasmine/.

http://test.cita.illinois.edu/aria/tabpanel/tabpanel1.php.

http://www.welie.com/patterns/showPattern.php?patternID=tabbing.

http://test.cita.illinois.edu/aria/.

http://test.cita.illinois.edu/aria/tabpanel/tabpanel1.php.

http://www.w3.org/TR/wai-aria/roles#tab.

http://www.w3.org/TR/wai-aria/roles#tablist.

http://www.w3.org/TR/wai-aria/roles#tabpanel.

http://www.w3.org/TR/wai-aria/states_and_properties#aria-controls.

http://www.w3.org/TR/wai-aria/states_and_properties#aria-hidden.

http://www.w3.org/TR/wai-aria/states_and_properties.

http://test.cita.illinois.edu/aria/tabpanel/tabpanel1.php.

http://jqueryui.com.

http://jquery.com.

http://yuilibrary.com.

http://dojotoolkit.org.

http://www.kendoui.com.

http://developers.google.com/web-toolkit/.

http://prototypejs.org.

http://livepipe.net/.

http://www.sencha.com/products/extjs.

http://dhtmlx.com.

http://jxlib.org.

http://mootools.net.

Araújo, B.C., Rocha, A.C., Xavier, A., Muniz, A.I., Garcia, F.P.: Web-based tool for automatic acceptance test execution and scripting for programmers and customers. In: Proceedings of the 2007 Euro American Conference on Telematics and Information Systems, EATIS ’07, vol. 1, pp. 56:1–56:4. ACM, New York, NY (2007). doi:https://doi.org/10.1145/1352694.1352752

Borodin, Y., Bigham, J.P., Dausch, G., Ramakrishnan, I.V.: More than meets the eye: a survey of screen-reader browsing strategies. In: Proceedings of the 2010 International Cross Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility (W4A), W4A ’10, vol. 1, pp. 13:1–13:10. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2010). doi:https://doi.org/10.1145/1805986.1806005

Brajnik, G.: Beyond conformance: the role of accessibility evaluation methods. In: Web Information Systems Engineering—WISE 2008 Workshops, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 5176, pp. 63–80. Springer Berlin/Heidelberg (2008). doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85200-1_9. http://www.springerlink.com/content/p3l7030k62j65029/

Brajnik, G., Yesilada, Y., Harper, S.: Testability and validity of WCAG 2.0: the expertise effect. In: Proceedings of the 12th international ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility, ASSETS ’10, vol. 1, pp. 43–50. ACM, New York, NY (2010). doi:https://doi.org/10.1145/1878803.1878813

Cannizzo, F., Clutton, R., Ramesh, R.: Pushing the boundaries of testing and continuous integration. In: Proceedings of the Agile 2008, pp. 501–505. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA (2008). doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/Agile.2008.31. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1443221.1443547

Chen, A., Harper, S., Lunn, D., Brown, A.: Widget identification: A high-level approach to accessibility. World Wide Web 16(1), 73–89 (2013). doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11280-012-0156-6 CrossRef

Cooper, M.: Accessibility of emerging rich web technologies: web 2.0 and the semantic web. In: Proceedings of the 2007 International Cross-Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility (W4A), W4A ’07, vol. 1, pp. 93–98. ACM, New York, NY (2007). doi:https://doi.org/10.1145/1243441.1243463

Doush, I.A., Alkhateeb, F., Maghayreh, E.A., Al-Betar, M.A.: The design of RIA accessibility evaluation tool. Adv. Eng. Softw. 57, 1–7 (2013). doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2012.11.004. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965997812001512 CrossRef

Fernandes, N., Batista, A.S., Costa, D., Duarte, C., Carriço, L.: Three web accessibility evaluation perspectives for RIA. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Cross-Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility, W4A ’13, vol. 1, pp. 12:1–12:9. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2013). doi:https://doi.org/10.1145/2461121.2461122

10.

Fernandes, N., Costa, D., Neves, S., Duarte, C., Carriço, L.: Evaluating the accessibility of rich internet applications. In: Proceedings of the International Cross-Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility, W4A ’12, vol. 1, pp. 13:1–13:4. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2012). doi:https://doi.org/10.1145/2207016.2207019

11.

Fernandes, N., Lopes, R., Carriço, L.: On web accessibility evaluation environments. In: Proceedings of the International Cross-Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility, W4A ’11, vol. 1, pp. 4:1–4:10. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2011). doi:https://doi.org/10.1145/1969289.1969295

12.

Fowler, M., Foemmel, M.: Continuous integration, http://www.martinfowler.com/articles/continuousIntegration.html (2005)

13.

Freire, A.P.: Disabled people and the web: user-based measurement of accessibility. Ph.D. thesis, University of York, Department of Computer Science, Submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, York, England (2012)

14.

Freire, A.P., Fortes, R.P.M., Turine, M.A.S., Paiva, D.M.B.: An evaluation of web accessibility metrics based on their attributes. In: SIGDOC ’08: Proceedings of the 26th Annual ACM International Conference on Design of Communication, vol. 1, pp. 73–80. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2008). doi:https://doi.org/10.1145/1456536.1456551

15.

Freire, A.P., Goularte, R., Fortes, R.P.M.: Techniques for developing more accessible web applications: a survey towards a process classification. In: SIGDOC ’07: Proceedings of the 25th Annual ACM International Conference on Design of Communication, vol. 1, pp. 162–169. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2007). doi:https://doi.org/10.1145/1297144.1297177

16.

Freire, A.P., Russo, C.M., Fortes, R.P.M.: A survey on the accessibility awareness of people involved in web development projects in Brazil. In: W4A ’08: Proceedings of the 2008 International Cross-Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility (W4A), vol. 1, pp. 87–96. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2008). doi:https://doi.org/10.1145/1368044.1368064

17.

Gehtland, J., Almaer, D., Galbraith, B.: Pragmatic Ajax: A Web 2.0 Primer. Pragmatic Bookshelf (2006)

18.

Gibson, B.: Enabling an accessible web 2.0. In: Proceedings of the 2007 International Cross-Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility (W4A), W4A ’07, vol. 1, pp. 1–6. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2007). doi:https://doi.org/10.1145/1243441.1243442

19.

Henry, S.L., Grossnickle, M.: Accessibility in the User–Centered Design Process. Georgia Tech Research Corporation, Atlanta, Georgia, USA (2004). http://www.uaiaccess.com/accessucd(On-line book)

20.

Hsia, P., Gao, J., Samuel, J., Kung, D., Toyoshima, Y., Chen, C.: Behavior-based acceptance testing of software systems: a formal scenario approach. In: Computer Software and Applications Conference, 1994. COMPSAC 94. Proceedings, Eighteenth Annual International, pp. 293 –298 (1994). doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/CMPSAC.1994.342789

21.

IEEE, I.o.E.a.E.E.: IEEE standard for software verification and validation plans. IEEE Std 1012-1986, pp. I (1986). doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEESTD.1986.79647

22.

Kelly, B., Sloan, D., Brown, S., Seale, J., Petrie, H., Lauke, P., Ball, S.: Accessibility 2.0: people, policies and processes. In: W4A ’07: Proceedings of the 2007 International Cross-Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility (W4A), pp. 138–147. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2007). doi:https://doi.org/10.1145/1243441.1243471

23.

Kelly, B., Sloan, D., Phipps, L., Petrie, H., Hamilton, F.: Forcing standardization or accommodating diversity? A framework for applying the wcag in the real world. In: W4A ’05: Proceedings of the 2005 International Cross-Disciplinary Workshop on Web Accessibility (W4A), pp. 46–54. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2005). doi:https://doi.org/10.1145/1061811.1061820

24.

Lazar, J., Feng, J.H., Hochheiser, H.: Research Methods in Human–Computer Interaction. Wiley, New York (2010)

25.

Leung, H.K.N., Wong, P.W.L.: A study of user acceptance tests. Softw Qual Control 6, 137–149 (1997). doi:https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018503800709. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=599113.599137 CrossRef

26.

Nielsen, J., Mack, R.L. (eds.): Usability Inspection Methods. Wiley, New York (1994)

27.

North, D.: Introducing BDD (2006). http://dannorth.net/introducing-bdd/

28.

Reid, L.G., Snow-Weaver, A.: WCAG 2.0: a web accessibility standard for the evolving web. In: W4A ’08: Proceedings of the 2008 International Cross-Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility (W4A), pp. 109–115. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2008). doi:https://doi.org/10.1145/1368044.1368069

29.

Stephanidis, C.: The Universal Access Handbook. CRC Press Inc, Boca Raton, FL, USA (2009)CrossRef

30.

Tateishi, T., Miyashita, H., Naoshi, T., Saito, S., Ono, K.: DHTML accessibility checking based on static javascript analysis. In: Stephanidis, C. (ed.) Universal Access in Human–Computer Interaction. Applications and Services, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4556, pp. 167–176. Springer, Berlin(2007). doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73283-9_20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73283-9_20

31.

Thiessen, P., Hockema, S.: WAI-ARIA live regions: eBuddy IM as a case example. In: Proceedings of the 2010 International Cross Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility (W4A), W4A ’10, vol. 1, pp. 33:1–33:9. ACM, New York, NY (2010). doi:https://doi.org/10.1145/1805986.1806030

32.

Velasco, C.A., Denev, D., Stegemann, D., Mohamad, Y.: A web compliance engineering framework to support the development of accessible rich internet applications. In: W4A ’08: Proceedings of the 2008 International Cross-Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility (W4A), pp. 45–49. ACM, New York, NY (2008). doi:https://doi.org/10.1145/1368044.1368054

33.

Vigo, M., Arrue, M., Brajnik, G., Lomuscio, R., Abascal, J.: Quantitative metrics for measuring web accessibility. In: W4A ’07: Proceedings of the 2007 International Cross-Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility (W4A), pp. 99–107. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2007). doi:https://doi.org/10.1145/1243441.1243465

34.

W3C: Web content accessibility guidelines 1.0. W3C Recommendation (1999). http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG10/

35.

W3C: Web content accessibility guidelines 2.0. W3C Recommendation (2008). http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/

36.

W3C: WAI-ARIA 1.0 authoring practices—an author’s guide to understanding and implementing accessible rich internet applications. W3C Working Draft (2013). http://www.w3.org/TR/wai-aria-practices/

37.

W3C: Accessible rich internet applications—version 1.0. W3C Recommendation (2014). http://www.w3.org/TR/wai-aria/

38.

Watanabe, T.: Experimental evaluation of usability and accessibility of heading elements. In: W4A ’07: Proceedings of the 2007 International Cross-Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility (W4A), pp. 157–164. ACM, New York, NY (2007). doi:https://doi.org/10.1145/1243441.1243473

39.

Watanabe, W.M., Neto, D.F., Bittar, T.J., Fortes, R.P.M.: WCAG conformance approach based on model-driven development and WebML. In: Proceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Design of Communication, SIGDOC ’10, vol. 1, pp. 167–174. ACM, New York, NY (2010). doi:10.1145/1878450.1878479

Titel: Acceptance tests for validating ARIA requirements in widgets
verfasst von: Willian Massami Watanabe
Renata P. M. Fortes
Ana Luiza Dias
Publikationsdatum: 26.10.2015
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Universal Access in the Information Society / Ausgabe 1/2017
Print ISSN: 1615-5289
Elektronische ISSN: 1615-5297
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-015-0437-9

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2017

How to solve students’ problems in a flipped classroom: a quasi-experimental approach

Web site accessibility, usability and security: a survey of government web sites in Kyrgyz Republic

Location of navigation menus in websites: an experimental study with Arabic users

Augmentative and alternative communication devices for aphasia: the emerging role of “smart” mobile devices

New challenges in web accessibility

Developing an antecedent model of knowledge sharing intention in virtual communities

Premium Partner