nach oben

Erschienen in:

26.05.2022 | Technical Article

Aerospace, Energy Recovery, and Medical Applications: Shape Memory Alloy Case Studies for CASMART 3rd Student Design Challenge

verfasst von: Faith Gantz, Hannah Stroud, John C. Fuller, Kelsa Adams, Peter E. Caltagirone, Hande Ozcan, Ibrahim Karaman, Darren J. Hartl, Aaron P. Stebner, William Trehern, Travis Turner, Robert W. Wheeler, Marcus L. Young, Othmane Benafan

Erschienen in: Shape Memory and Superelasticity | Ausgabe 2/2022

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

This collection of case studies presents a brief introduction of fundamental concepts for four SMA-based applications in the aerospace, energy, and medical fields designed by students and facilitated by professionals. The Consortium for the Advancement of Shape Memory Alloy Research and Technology (CASMART) Student Design Challenge is used as an outreach strategy to promote the implementation of state-of-the-art designs with SMA technology and is meant to inspire the next generation of SMA research. Student design challenge teams address real-world problems facing the SMA community and receive guidance and feedback from CASMART members. Student teams’ hardware and materials deliverables had to meet basic function requirements specific to the application. Key results from seven teams (four hardware designs and three materials designs) highlight the design priorities, processes, and challenges raised during development. The hardware designs used NiTi wires shape set and implemented by the students into prototypes for deployment and reorientation mechanisms in small satellites, linear generators to save energy, and a self-apply tourniquet design. Materials development explored the processability and material properties of CuAl-based and NiTi-based alloys for passive actuators in a deployment and reorientation mechanism for a small satellite, energy recovery from waste heat, and a pseudoelastic spinal curvature correction device.

Vorheriger Artikel Active Wearable Compression with Shape Memory Actuators for Treating Chronic Edema

Nächster Artikel Electrical Resistance Modeling of Shape Memory Alloy Wire Using an Efficient Performance Analysis Approach

For more information about CASMART, please visit www.CASMART.org.

Buehler W, Gilfrich J, Riley R (1963) Effect of low-temperature phase changes on the mechanical properties of alloys near composition Ti–Ni. Appl Phys 34:1475–1477CrossRef

Jani JM, Leary M, Subic A, Gibson MA (2014) A review of shape memory alloy research, applications and opportunities. Mater Des 1980–2015(56):1078–1113CrossRef

Jani JM, Leary M, Subic A (2014) Shape memory alloys in automotive applications. Appl Mech Mater 663:248–253CrossRef

Chaudhari R, Vora JJ, Parikh DM (2021) A review on applications of nitinol shape memory alloy. In: Recent Advances in Mechanical Infrastructure. Springer, pp 123–132

Cross WB, Kariotis AH, Stimler FJ (1969) Nitinol characterization study. NASA, Langley Research Center

Jackson CM, Wagner HM, Wasilewski RJ (1972) 55-Nitinol-the alloy with a memory: it’s physical metallurgy properties, and applications. NASA SP-5110, vol 5110. NASA Special Publication

Duerig TW, Melton KN, Stöckel D (2013) Engineering aspects of shape memory alloys. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford

Calkins FT, Mabe JH (2010) Shape memory alloy based morphing aerostructures

Derby S, Sreekumar M, Nagarajan T, Singaperumal M, Zoppi M, Molfino R (2007) Critical review of current trends in shape memory alloy actuators for intelligent robots. Ind Robot

10.

Rodrigue H, Wang W, Han M-W, Kim TJY, Ahn S-H (2017) An overview of shape memory alloy-coupled actuators and robots. Soft Robot 4(1):3–15CrossRef

11.

Sutou Y, Omori T, Wang JJ, Kainuma R, Ishida K (2004) Characteristics of Cu–Al–Mn-based shape memory alloys and their applications. Mater Sci Eng A 378(1–2):278–282CrossRef

12.

Schmidt M, Schütze A, Seelecke S (2015) Scientific test setup for investigation of shape memory alloy based elastocaloric cooling processes. Int J Refrig 54:88–97CrossRef

13.

Hou H et al (2019) Fatigue-resistant high-performance elastocaloric materials made by additive manufacturing. Science 366(6469):1116–1121CrossRef

14.

Zareie S, Issa AS, Seethaler RJ, Zabihollah A (2020) Recent advances in the applications of shape memory alloys in civil infrastructures: a review. Structures 27:1535–1550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2020.05.058CrossRef

15.

Costanza G, Tata ME (2020) Shape memory alloys for aerospace, recent developments, and new applications: a short review. Materials 13(8):1856. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13081856CrossRef

16.

Lockney D. Mechanical and Fluid Systems Superelastic Tire. National Aeronautics and Space Administration. https://technology.nasa.gov/patent/LEW-TOPS-99

17.

Benafan O, Moholt MR, Bass M, Mabe JH, Nicholson DE, Calkins FT (2019) Recent advancements in rotary shape memory alloy actuators for aeronautics. Shape Mem Superelast 5(4):415–428CrossRef

18.

Wheeler III RW (2017) Actuation fatigue characterization methods and lifetime predictions of shape memory alloy actuators. https://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/161597

19.

Casalena L et al (2017) Mechanical behavior and microstructural analysis of NiTi-40Au shape memory alloys exhibiting work output above 400 °C. Intermetallics 86:33–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intermet.2017.03.005CrossRef

20.

Demblon A et al (2022) Compositional and microstructural sensitivity of the actuation fatigue response in NiTiHf high temperature shape memory alloys. Mater Sci Eng A 838:142786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2022.142786CrossRef

21.

Young ML et al (2019) Characterization and processing of high temperature shape memory alloys for aerospace applications. In: AIAA Scitech 2019 Forum, p 1196

22.

Kota S, Hetrick J, Li Z, Saggere L (1999) Tailoring unconventional actuators using compliant transmissions: design methods and applications. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron 4(4):396–408. https://doi.org/10.1109/3516.809518CrossRef

23.

Hartl DJ, Lagoudas DC, Calkins FT (2011) Advanced methods for the analysis, design, and optimization of SMA-based aerostructures. Smart Mater Struct 20(9):94006. https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/20/9/094006CrossRef

24.

Benafan O et al (2014) Shape memory alloy actuator design: CASMART collaborative best practices and case studies. Int J Mech Mater Des 10(1):1–42CrossRef

25.

Caltagirone PE et al (2021) Shape memory alloy-enabled expandable space habitat—case studies for second CASMART student design challenge. Shape Memory Superelast 1–24

26.

Lagoudas DC (2008) Shape memory alloys: modeling and engineering applications. Springer, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-47685-8CrossRef

27.

Ma J, Karaman I, Noebe RD (2010) High temperature shape memory alloys. Int Mater Rev 55(5):257–315CrossRef

28.

Wheeler III RW (2017) Actuation fatigue characterization methods and lifetime predictions of shape memory alloy actuators. Texas A & M University

29.

Puig-Suari J, Turner C, Ahlgren W (2001) Development of the standard CubeSat deployer and a CubeSat class PicoSatellite. In: 2001 IEEE Aerospace Conference Proceedings (Cat. No. 01TH8542), vol 1, pp 1–347

30.

Woellert K, Ehrenfreund P, Ricco AJ, Hertzfeld H (2011) Cubesats: Cost-effective science and technology platforms for emerging and developing nations. Adv Space Res 47(4):663–684CrossRef

31.

Swartwout M (2011) Attack of the CubeSats: A Statistical Look (SSC11-VI-04). In: 25th Annual AIAA/USU Conference on Small Satellites

32.

Hunter R, Korsmeyer D (2015) A Review of NASA Ames CubeSat Program

33.

Subbian J, Raikwar S, Sindam NK, Madhav MT, Anand PI (2021) Design and development of NiTi shape memory alloy belt for waste heat energy recovery system. J Mater Eng Perform 30(12):9048–9058. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-021-06091-7CrossRef

34.

Qian S et al (2016) A review of elastocaloric cooling: materials, cycles and system integrations. Int J Refrig 64:1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2015.12.001CrossRef

35.

Qian S, Wang Y, Yuan L, Yu J (2019) A heat driven elastocaloric cooling system. Energy 182:881–899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.06.094CrossRef

36.

Kumar PK, Lagoudas DC (2008) Introduction to shape memory alloys. shape memory alloys modeling and engineering applications. Springer, New York

37.

Consortium for the Advancement of Shape Memory Alloy Research and Technology. CASMART SMA Actuator Design Tool (2018)

38.

Fayssoux RS, Cho RH, Herman MJ (2010) A history of bracing for idiopathic scoliosis in North America. Clin Orthopaedics Relat Res 468(3):654–664CrossRef

39.

Chan W-Y et al (2018) Mechanical and clinical evaluation of a shape memory alloy and conventional struts in a flexible scoliotic brace. Ann Biomed Eng 46(8):1194–1205CrossRef

40.

Ali A, Fontanari V, Fontana M, Schmölz W (2021) Spinal deformities and advancement in corrective orthoses. Bioengineering 8(1):2CrossRef

41.

Nachemson AL et al (1995) Effectiveness of treatment with a brace in girls who have adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. A prospective, controlled study based on data from the Brace Study of the Scoliosis Research Society. J Bone Joint Surg Ser A 77(6):815–822CrossRef

42.

Wong MS et al (2008) The effect of rigid versus flexible spinal orthosis on the clinical efficacy and acceptance of the patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 33(12):1360–1365CrossRef

43.

Coillard C, Leroux MA, Zabjek KF, Rivard C (2003) SpineCor–a non-rigid brace for the treatment of idiopathic scoliosis: post-treatment results. Eur Spine J 12(2):141–148CrossRef

44.

Safranski D, Dupont K, Gall K (2020) Pseudoelastic NiTiNOL in orthopaedic applications. Shape Mem Superelast 6(3):332–341CrossRef

45.

GSFC (2021) GSFC-STD-7000 REV B General Environmental Verification Standard (GEVS) for GSFC Flight Programs and Projects. Greenbelt

46.

National Aeronautics and Space Administration (2022) DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS FOR MECHANISMS. NASA-STD-5017, 2016. https://standards.nasa.gov/standard/nasa/nasa-std-5017. Accessed: March 21

47.

DoD 2018.3 SBIR Solicitation (2018) Shape memory alloy heat engine

48.

Moholt M, Benafan O (2017) Spanwise adaptive wing. In: 3rd annual convergent aeronautics solutions showcase and innovation faire, pp 19–20

49.

Husain SW, Clapp PC (1988) The effect of aging on the fracture behavior of Cu-AI-Ni jo phase alloys. Metall Trans A 19(7):1761–1766CrossRef

50.

Stoeckel D, Pelton A, Duerig T (2004) Self-expanding nitinol stents: material and design considerations. Eur Radiol 14(2):292–301CrossRef

51.

Hurst CL, Duncanson MG Jr, Nanda RS, Angolkar PV (1990) An evaluation of the shape-memory phenomenon of nickel-titanium orthodontic wires. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 98(1):72–76CrossRef

52.

Hodgson DE, Zider RB (1988) Shape-memory alloy resetting method. Google Patents

53.

Guerioune M et al (2008) SHS of shape memory CuZnAl alloys. Int J Self Propag High Temp Synth 17(1):41–48CrossRef

54.

Dasgupta R (2014) A look into Cu-based shape memory alloys: present scenario and future prospects. J Mater Res 29(16):1681–1698CrossRef

55.

Alaneme KK, Okotete EA (2016) Reconciling viability and cost-effective shape memory alloy options—a review of copper and iron based shape memory metallic systems. Eng Sci Technol Int J 19(3):1582–1592

56.

Čolić M et al (2010) Relationship between microstructure, cytotoxicity and corrosion properties of a Cu–Al–Ni shape memory alloy. Acta Biomater 6(1):308–317CrossRef

57.

Ivanić I, Gojić M, Kožuh S (2014) Alloys with shape recollection (Part II): the most significant properties. Chem Ind 63(9–10):331–344

58.

Young ML, Wagner M-X, Frenzel J, Schmahl WW, Eggeler G (2010) Phase volume fractions and strain measurements in an ultrafine-grained NiTi shape-memory alloy during tensile loading. Acta Mater 58(7):2344–2354CrossRef

59.

Zhen W, Liu X, Xie J (2011) Effects of solidification parameters on microstructure and mechanical properties of continuous columnar-grained Cu–Al–Ni alloy. Prog Nat Sci 21(5):368–374CrossRef

60.

Morris MA, Lipe T (1994) Microstructural influence of Mn additions on thermoelastic and pseudoelastic properties of Cu Al Ni alloys. Acta Metall Mater 42(5):1583–1594CrossRef

61.

Yang J et al (2022) First-principles study of the effect of aluminum content on the elastic properties of Cu-Al alloys. Mater Today Commun 31:103399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.103399CrossRef

62.

Tadaki T, Otsuka K, Shimizu K (1988) Shape memory alloys. Annu Rev Mater Sci 18(1):25–45CrossRef

63.

Saud SN, Hamzah E, Abubakar T, Bakhsheshi-Rad HR, Zamri M, Tanemura M (2014) Effects of Mn additions on the structure, mechanical properties, and corrosion behavior of Cu-Al-Ni shape memory alloys. J Mater Eng Perform 23(10):3620–3629CrossRef

64.

Yang Q et al (2018) Suppressing heating rate-dependent martensitic stabilization in ductile Cu-Al-Mn shape memory alloys by Ni addition: an experimental and first-principles study. Mater Charact 145:381–388CrossRef

65.

Ueland SM, Schuh CA (2013) Grain boundary and triple junction constraints during martensitic transformation in shape memory alloys. J Appl Phys 114(5):53503CrossRef

66.

Chen Y, Zhang X, Dunand DC, Schuh CA (2009) Shape memory and superelasticity in polycrystalline Cu–Al–Ni microwires. Appl Phys Lett 95(17):171906CrossRef

67.

Van Humbeeck J, Chandrasekaran M, Delaey L (1989) The influence of post quench aging in the beta-phase on the transformation characteristics and the physical and mechanical properties of martensite in a Cu–Al–Ni shape memory alloy. ISIJ Int 29(5):388–394CrossRef

68.

Gao Y, Zhu M, Lai JKL (1998) Microstructure characterization and effect of thermal cycling and ageing on vanadium-doped Cu–Al–Ni–Mn high-temperature shape memory alloy. J Mater Sci 33(14):3579–3584CrossRef

69.

Font J, Muntasell J, Pons J, Cesari E (1997) Thermal cycling effects in high temperature Cu–Al–Ni–Mn–B shape memory alloys. J Mater Res 12(9):2288–2297CrossRef

70.

Adachi K, Shoji K, Hamada Y (1989) Formation of X phases and origin of grain refinement effect in Cu–Al–Ni shape memory alloys added with titanium. ISIJ Int 29(5):378–387CrossRef

71.

Otsuka K, Wayman CM, Nakai K, Sakamoto H, Shimizu K (1976) Superelasticity effects and stress-induced martensitic transformations in Cu Al Ni alloys. Acta Metall 24(3):207–226CrossRef

72.

Oliveira JP et al (2018) Laser welding of Cu-Al-Be shape memory alloys: microstructure and mechanical properties. Mater Des 148:145–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2018.03.066CrossRef

73.

Mazzer EM, da Silva MR, Gargarella P (2022) Revisiting Cu-based shape memory alloys: recent developments and new perspectives. J Mater Res 37(1):162–182. https://doi.org/10.1557/s43578-021-00444-7CrossRef

74.

Recarte V, Pérez-Sáez RB, Bocanegra EH, Nó ML, San Juan J (1999) “Dependence of the martensitic transformation characteristics on concentration in Cu–Al–Ni shape memory alloys. Mater Sci Eng A 273:380–384CrossRef

75.

Frenzel J, Wieczorek A, Opahle I, Maaß B, Drautz R, Eggeler G (2015) On the effect of alloy composition on martensite start temperatures and latent heats in Ni-Ti-based shape memory alloys. Acta Mater 90:213–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2015.02.029CrossRef

76.

Atli KC, Karaman I, Noebe RD (2011) Work output of the two-way shape memory effect in Ti50.5Ni 24.5Pd25 high-temperature shape memory alloy. Scripta Mater 65(10):903–906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.08.006CrossRef

77.

Atli KC, Karaman I, Noebe RD, Bigelow G, Gaydosh D (2015) Work production using the two-way shape memory effect in NiTi and a Ni-rich NiTiHf high-temperature shape memory alloy. Smart Mater Struct 24(12):125023. https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/24/12/125023CrossRef

78.

Mosekilde L, Mosekilde L, Danielsen CC (1987) Biomechanical competence of vertebral trabecular bone in relation to ash density and age in normal individuals. Bone 8(2):79–85CrossRef

79.

Amin-Ahmadi B, Gallmeyer T, Pauza JG, Duerig TW, Noebe RD, Stebner AP (2018) Effect of a pre-aging treatment on the mechanical behaviors of Ni50.3Ti49.7 − xHfx (x ≤ 9 at.%) Shape memory alloys. Scripta Mater 147:11–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2017.12.024CrossRef

Titel: Aerospace, Energy Recovery, and Medical Applications: Shape Memory Alloy Case Studies for CASMART 3rd Student Design Challenge
verfasst von: Faith Gantz
Hannah Stroud
John C. Fuller
Kelsa Adams
Peter E. Caltagirone
Hande Ozcan
Ibrahim Karaman
Darren J. Hartl
Aaron P. Stebner
William Trehern
Travis Turner
Robert W. Wheeler
Marcus L. Young
Othmane Benafan
Publikationsdatum: 26.05.2022
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Shape Memory and Superelasticity / Ausgabe 2/2022
Print ISSN: 2199-384X
Elektronische ISSN: 2199-3858
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40830-022-00368-z

Premium Partner

Marktübersichten

Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen.

Zur Marktübersicht

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2022

Pre-strain and Mean Strain Effects on the Fatigue Behavior of Superelastic Nitinol Medical Devices

Nitinol Release of Nickel under Physiological Conditions: Effects of Surface Oxide, pH, Hydrogen Peroxide, and Sodium Hypochlorite

Fatigue, Fracture, and Crack Arrest from Bending Induced Pre-strain in Superelastic Nitinol

Active Wearable Compression with Shape Memory Actuators for Treating Chronic Edema

Effects of Nitinol Microstructural Purity on Localized and Uniform Corrosion Susceptibility

CASMART 5th Design Challenge at SMST 2022

Premium Partner

Marktübersichten