nach oben

Engineering with Computers

Erschienen in:

21.11.2022 | Original Article

An enhanced hybrid seagull optimization algorithm with its application in engineering optimization

verfasst von: Gang Hu, Jiao Wang, Yan Li, MingShun Yang, Jiaoyue Zheng

Erschienen in: Engineering with Computers | Ausgabe 2/2023

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Aiming at the problems such as slow search speed, low optimization accuracy, and premature convergence of standard seagull optimization algorithm, an enhanced hybrid strategy seagull optimization algorithm was proposed. First, chaos mapping is used to generate the initial population to increase the diversity of the population, which lays the foundation for the global search. Then, a nonlinear convergence parameter and inertia weight are introduced to improve the convergence factor and to balance the global exploration and local development of the algorithm, so as to accelerate the convergence speed. Finally, an imitation crossover mutation strategy is introduced to avoid premature convergence of the algorithm. Comparison and verification between MSSOA and its incomplete algorithms are better than SOA, indicating that each improvement is effective and its incomplete algorithms all improve SOA to different degrees in both exploration and exploitation. 25 classic functions and the CEC2014 benchmark functions were tested, and compared with seven well-known meta-heuristic algorithms and its improved algorithm to evaluate the validity of the algorithm. The algorithm can explore different regions of the search space, avoid local optimum and converge to global optimum. Compared with other algorithms, the results of non-parametric statistical analysis and performance index show that the enhanced algorithm in this paper has better comprehensive optimization performance, significantly improves the search speed and convergence precision, and has strong ability to get rid of the local optimal solution. At the same time, in order to prove its applicability and feasibility, it is used to solve two constrained mechanical engineering design problems contain the interpolation curve engineering design and the aircraft wing design. The engineering curve shape with minimum energy, minimum curvature, and the smoother shape of airfoil with low drag are obtained. It is proved that enhanced algorithm in this paper can solve practical problems with constrained and unknown search space highly effectively.

Vorheriger Artikel GPU-enabled microfluidic design automation for concentration gradient generators

Nächster Artikel RETRACTED ARTICLE: Dynamic simulation of moderately thick annular system coupled with shape memory alloy and multi-phase nanocomposite face sheets

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Wang J, Li Y, Hu G, Yang MS (2019) Lightweight research in engineering: a review. Appl Sci 9(24):5322. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9245322CrossRef

Zheng Y, Wang J, Li GC (2014) A collective neurodynamic optimization approach to Bound constrained nonconvex optimization. Neural Netw 55:20–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2014.03.006CrossRefMATH

Fister Jr I, Yang XS, Fister I et al (2013) A brief review of nature-inspired algorithms for optimization. Elektrotehniski Vestnik 80(3):1–7. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1307.4186CrossRefMATH

Dhiman G, Kumar V (2019) Spotted hyena optimizer for solving complex and non-linear constrained engineering problems. Harmony search and nature inspired optimization algorithms. Springer, Berlin, pp 857–867. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0761-4_81CrossRef

Goldberg DE (1989) Genetic Algorithms in search, optimization and machine learning. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co Inc, LondonMATH

Mirjalili S, Mirjalili SM, Lewis A (2014) Grey wolf optimizer. Adv Eng Softw 2014:46–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2013.12.007CrossRef

Karaboga D, Basturk B (2007) Artificial bee colony (ABC) optimization algorithm for solving constrained optimization. Int Fuzzy Syst Assoc World Congr 4529:789–798. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72950-1_77CrossRefMATH

Qi CM, Zhou ZB, Sun YC, Song HB, Hu LS, Wang Q (2016) Feature selection and multiple kernel boosting framework based on PSO with mutation mechanism for hyperspectral classification. Neurocomputing 220:181–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2016.05.103CrossRef

Rashedi E, Nezamabadi-pour H, Saryazdi S (2009) GSA: a gravitational search algorithm. Inform Science 179(13):2232–2248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2009.03.004CrossRefMATH

10.

Cuong-Le T, Hoang-Le M, Khatir S et al (2021) A novel version of Cuckoo search algorithm for solving optimization problems. Eepert Syst Appl 186:115669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115669CrossRef

11.

Mirjalili S (2015) SCA: A sine cosine algorithm for solving optimization problems. Knowl-Based Syst 2015:120–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2015.12.022CrossRef

12.

Tharwat A, Hassanien AE (2017) Chaotic antlion algorithm for parameter optimization of support vector machine. Appl Intell 4:1–17

13.

Mirjalili S, Lewis A (2016) The whale optimization algorithm. Adv eng softw 95:51–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2016.01.008CrossRef

14.

Jiang QY, Wang L, Lin YY et al (2017) An efficient multi-objective artificial raindrop algorithm and its application to dynamic optimization problems in chemical processes. Appl Soft Comput 58:354–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2017.05.003CrossRef

15.

Dhiman G, Kumar V (2019) Seagull optimization algorithm: theory and its applications for large-scale industrial engineering problems. Knowl-Based Syst 165:169–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2018.11.024CrossRef

16.

Wolpert DH, Macready WG (1997) No free lunch theorems for optimization. IEEE Trans Evolut Comput 1(1):67–82. https://doi.org/10.1109/4235.585893CrossRef

17.

Hu G, Zhu XN, Guo W, Chang CT (2021) An improved marine predators algorithm for shape optimization of developable Ball surfaces. Eng Appl Artif Intell 105:104417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2021.104417CrossRef

18.

Amirsadri S, Mousavirad SJ, Ebrahimpour-Komleh H (2017) A levy flight-based grey wolf optimizer combined with back-propagation algorithm for neural network training. Neural Comput Applic 30(12):3707–3720. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-017-2952-5CrossRef

19.

Xu LW, Li YZ, Li KC, Beng GH et al (2018) Enhanced moth-flame optimization based on cultural learning and Gaussian mutation. J Bionic Eng 15(4):751–763CrossRef

20.

Tharwat A, Schenck W (2020) A conceptual and practical comparison of PSO-style optimization algorithms. Expert Syst Appl 167(5):114430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2020.114430CrossRef

21.

Gupta S, Deep K (2019) Improved sine cosine algorithm with crossover scheme for global optimization. Knowl-Based Syst 165:374–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2018.12.008CrossRef

22.

Rather S, Bala P (2020) Swarm-based chaotic gravitational search algorithm for solving mechanical engineering design problems. World J Eng 17(1):97–114. https://doi.org/10.1108/WJE-09-2019-0254CrossRef

23.

Zheng JY, Hu G, Ji XM, Qin XQ (2022) Quintic generalized Hermite interpolation curves: construction and shape optimization using an improved GWO algorithm. Comput Appl Math 41(3):1–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40314-022-01813-6MathSciNetCrossRefMATH

24.

Jing K, Zhao X, Zhang X, Liu D (2018) Ant lion optimizer with levy variation and adaptive elite competition mechanism. CAAI Trans Intell Syst 13(2):236–242. https://doi.org/10.11992/tis.201706091CrossRef

25.

Coelho L (2010) Gaussian quantum-behaved particle swarm optimization approaches for constrained engineering design problems. Expert Syst Appl 37(2):1676–1683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2009.06.044CrossRef

26.

Wu XL, Hu S, Cheng W (2021) Multi-objective signal timing optimization based on inproved whale optimization algorithm. J Kunming Univ Sci Technol (Natl Sci) 46(1):134–141

27.

Jia H, Xing Z, Song W (2019) A new hybrid seagull optimization algorithm for feature selection. IEEE Access 7:2169–3536. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2909945CrossRef

28.

Jiang H, Yang Y, Ping W, Dong Y (2020) A novel hybrid classification method based on the opposition-based seagull optimization algorithm. IEEE Access. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2997791CrossRef

29.

Cao Y, Li Y, Zhang G et al (2019) Experimental modeling of PEM fuel cells using a new improved seagull optimization algorithm. Energy Rep 5:1616–1625CrossRef

30.

Singh P, Dhiman G (2018) A hybrid fuzzy time series forecasting model based on granular computing and bio-inspired optimization approaches. J Comput Sci 27:370–385CrossRef

31.

Li JC (2018) Planar T-Bézier curve with approximate minimum curvature variation. J Adv Mech Des Syst Manuf. https://doi.org/10.1299/jamdsm.2018jamdsm0029CrossRef

32.

Li B, Jiang WS (1997) chaos optimization method and its application. Control Theory Appl 04:613–615

33.

Haupt RL, Haupt SE (2004) Practical genetic algorithm. John Wiley & Sons, New YorkMATH

34.

He D, He C, Jiang LG, Zhu HW, Hu GR (2001) Chaotic characteristics of a one-dimensional iterative map with infinite collapses. IEEE Trans Circ Syst I 48(7):900–906. https://doi.org/10.1109/81.933333MathSciNetCrossRefMATH

35.

Gandomi AH, Yang XS (2014) Chaotic bat algorithm. J Comput Sci 5(2):224–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocs.2013.10.002MathSciNetCrossRef

36.

Ozsoydan FB, Baykasoglu A (2021) Chaos and intensification enhanced flower pollination algorithm to solve mechanical design and unconstrained function optimization problems. Expert Syst Appl 4:115496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115496CrossRef

37.

Kohli M, Arora S (2018) Chaotic grey wolf optimization algorithm for constrained optimization problems. J Comput Des Eng 5(4):458–472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcde.2017.02.005CrossRef

38.

Wang M, Tang MZ (2016) Novel grey wolf optimization algorithm based on nonlinear convergence factor. Appl Res Comput 33(12):3648–3653MathSciNet

39.

Wei ZL, Zhao H, Li MD, Wang Y, Ke YM (2016) A Grey Wolf optimization algorithm based on nonlinear adjustment strategy of control parameter. J Air Force Eng Univ (Natl Sci Ed) 17(3):68–72

40.

Guo ZZ, Liu R, Gong CQ (2017) Study on improvement of gray wolf algorithm. Application Research of Computers 12:3603–3606

41.

Wu ZQ, Mu YM (2020) Improved whale optimization algorithm. Appl Res Comput 350(12):104–107

42.

Hao XH, Song JX, Zhou Q, Ma M (2020) Improved whale optimization algorithm based on hybrid strategy. Appl Res Comput 108:112–141

43.

Van den Bergh F (1999) Particle swarm weight initialization in multi-layer perceptron artificial neural networks. Development and Practice of Artificial Intelligence Techniques. Durban, South Africa, pp 41–45

44.

Cockshott AR, Hartman BE (2001) Improving the fermentation medium for Echinocandin B production part II: particle swarm optimization. Process Biochem 36:661–669CrossRef

45.

Coello Coello CA, Lechuga MS (2002) MOPSO: a proposal for multiple objective particle swarm optimization. Proceed Congr Evol Comput 2:1051–1056. https://doi.org/10.1109/CEC.2002.1004388CrossRef

46.

Yang SY, Liu F, Jiao LC (2001) The quantum evolutionary strategies. Acta Electron Sin 29(S1):1873–1877

47.

Meng A, Chen Y, Yin H et al (2014) Crisscross optimization algorithm and its application. Knowl-Based Syst 67:218–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2014.05.004CrossRef

48.

Hu G, Zhong JY, Du B, Guo W (2022) An enhanced hybrid arithmetic optimization algorithm for engineering applications. Comput Methods Appl Mech Engrg 394(2022):114901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2022.114901MathSciNetCrossRefMATH

49.

Liang JJ, Qu BY, Suganthan PN (2014) Problem definitions and evaluation criteria for the CEC 2014 special session and competition on single objective real-parameter numerical optimization. Computational Intelligence Laboratory and Nanyang Technological University, China and Singapore, Tech. Rep. p 201311

50.

Derrac J, García S, Molina D, Herrera F (2011) A practical tutorial on the use of nonparametric statistical tests as a methodology for comparing evolutionary and swarm intelligence algorithms. Swarm Evol Comput 1(1):3–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.swevo.2011.02.002CrossRef

51.

Carrasco J, García S, Rueda MM, Das S, Herrera F (2020) Recent trends in the use of statistical tests for comparing swarm and evolutionary computing algorithms: practical guidelines and a critical review. Swarm Evol Comput 54:100665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.swevo.2020.100665CrossRef

52.

Derrac J, García S, Hui S, Suganthan PN, Herrera F (2014) Analyzing convergence performance of evolutionary algorithms: a statistical approach. Inf Sci 289:41–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2014.06.009CrossRef

53.

Li JC (2019) A class of quintic Hermite interpolation curve and the free parameters selection. J Adv Mech Des Syst. https://doi.org/10.1299/jamdsm.2019jamdsm0011CrossRef

54.

Hu G, Dou WT, Wang X, Muhammad A (2022) An enhanced chimp optimization algorithm for optimal degree reduction of Said-Ball curves. Math Comput Simulat 197:207–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matcom.2022.01.018MathSciNetCrossRefMATH

55.

Gang X, Wang GZ, Chen WY (2011) Geometric construction of energy-minimizing Bézier curves. SCIENCE CHINA Inf Sci 07:1395–1406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-011-4294-8CrossRefMATH

56.

Li HJ, Zhang G, Wang WL (2018) Binary particle swarm optimization algorithm for coordinated adjustment of population diversity and inertia weight. J Chin Comput Syst 39(3):529–533

57.

Pierluigi DV, Elia D, Egidio D (2014) An airfoil shape optimization technique coupling PARSEC parameterization and evolutionary algorithm. Aerosp Sci Technol 32(1):103–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2013.11.006CrossRef

58.

Kulfan BM, Commercial B, Group A (2008) Universal parametric geometry representation method. J Aircraft 45(1):142–158. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.29958CrossRef

59.

Ariyarit A, Kanazaki M (2014) Multi-segment class-shape-transformation (CST) for global design exploration. Mecatronics. https://doi.org/10.1109/MECATRONICS.2014.7018600CrossRef

Titel: An enhanced hybrid seagull optimization algorithm with its application in engineering optimization
verfasst von: Gang Hu
Jiao Wang
Yan Li
MingShun Yang
Jiaoyue Zheng
Publikationsdatum: 21.11.2022
Verlag: Springer London
Erschienen in: Engineering with Computers / Ausgabe 2/2023
Print ISSN: 0177-0667
Elektronische ISSN: 1435-5663
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-022-01746-y

Neuer Inhalt

Bildnachweise

VDI-Icon, Profil Icon, inhalt2, Springer Professional Modul/© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, Die Gewinner und Laudatoren des Sustainability Award in Automotive 2024/© Uli Regenscheit | ATZlive, Search Icon, Banner Hanser, Dinko Eror/© Red Hat GmbH, Suresh Vittal/© Alteryx, Additiv gefertigte Teile/© Marina_Skoropadskaya | Getty Images | iStock, Zeitschrift Wissensmanagement Cover, PatentFit-Logo/© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ATZ-Webinar: Prototypenfreie Entwicklung durch Offline- und Driver-in-the-Loop-HiL-Tests /© (c) VI-grade, chassis.tech plus 2023/© [M] ATZlive / TÜV SÜD PRODUCT SERVICE GMBH, adäsion-Webinar-Matinee/© krystiannawrocki_ Getty Images

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2023

An efficient computational model for vibration behavior of a functionally graded sandwich plate in a hygrothermal environment with viscoelastic foundation effects

Optimal design of truss structures with frequency constraints: a comparative study of DE, IDE, LSHADE, and CMAES algorithms

Leveraging code generation for transparent immersogeometric fluid–structure interaction analysis on deforming domains

Thermal post-buckling analysis of graded sandwich curved structures under variable thermal loadings

Design of tunnel FET architectures for low power application using improved Chimp optimizer algorithm

Application of various robust techniques to study and evaluate the role of effective parameters on rock fragmentation

Neuer Inhalt

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.