Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Computational Mechanics
Erschienen in: Computational Mechanics 5/2016

01.05.2016 | Original Paper

Assessment and improvement of mapping algorithms for non-matching meshes and geometries in computational FSI

verfasst von: Tianyang Wang, Roland Wüchner, Stefan Sicklinger, Kai-Uwe Bletzinger

Erschienen in: Computational Mechanics | Ausgabe 5/2016

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This paper investigates data mapping between non-matching meshes and geometries in fluid-structure interaction. Mapping algorithms for surface meshes including nearest element interpolation, the standard mortar method and the dual mortar method are studied and comparatively assessed. The inconsistency problem of mortar methods at curved edges of fluid-structure-interfaces is solved by a newly developed enforcing consistency approach, which is robust enough to handle even the case that fluid boundary facets are totally not in contact with structure boundary elements due to high fluid refinement. Besides, tests with representative geometries show that the mortar methods are suitable for conservative mapping but it is better to use the nearest element interpolation in a direct way, and moreover, the dual mortar method can give slight oscillations. This work also develops a co-rotating mapping algorithm for 1D beam elements. Its novelty lies in the ability of handling large displacements and rotations.
Vorheriger Artikel Stable and flux-conserved meshfree formulation to model shocks
Nächster Artikel Numerical treatment of a geometrically nonlinear planar Cosserat shell model

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Ahrem R, Beckert A, Wendland H (2007) Recovering rotations in aeroelasticity. J Fluids Struct 23(6):874–884CrossRef
2.
Bazilevs Y, Hsu MC, Akkerman I, Wright S, Takizawa K, Henicke B, Spielman T, Tezduyar T (2011) 3D simulation of wind turbine rotors at full scale. Part I: geometry modeling and aerodynamics. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 65(1–3):207–235CrossRefMATH
3.
Bazilevs Y, Hsu MC, Kiendl J, Wüchner R, Bletzinger KU (2011) 3D simulation of wind turbine rotors at full scale. Part II: fluid-structure interaction modeling with composite blades. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 65(1–3):236–253CrossRefMATH
4.
Bazilevs Y, Hsu MC, Scott M (2012) Isogeometric fluid-structure interaction analysis with emphasis on non-matching discretizations, and with application to wind turbines. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 249:28–41MathSciNetCrossRef
5.
Bazilevs Y, Hsu MC, Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE (2012) ALE-VMS and ST-VMS methods for computer modeling of wind-turbine rotor aerodynamics and fluid-structure interaction. Math Model Methods Appl Sci 22(supp02):1230002CrossRefMATH
6.
Bazilevs Y, Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE (2013) Computational fluid-structure interaction: methods and applications. Wiley, ChichesterCrossRefMATH
7.
Beckert A, Wendland H (2001) Multivariate interpolation for fluid-structure-interaction problems using radial basis functions. Aerosp Sci Technol 5(2):125–134CrossRefMATH
8.
Bernardi C, Maday Y, Patera AT (1994) A new nonconforming approach to domain decomposition: the mortar element method. In: Brezis H, Lions JL (eds) Nonlinear partial differential equations and their applications, vol XI. College de France Seminar. Longman, Harlow, pp 13–51
9.
Blasques JPAA, Bitsche R, Fedorov V, Eder MA (2013) Applications of the beam cross section analysis software (becas). In: Proceedings of the 26th nordic seminar on computational mechanics, pp 46–49
10.
Blom FJ (1998) A monolithical fluid-structure interaction algorithm applied to the piston problem. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 167(3):369–391MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
11.
de Boer A, van Zuijlen AH, Bijl H (2008) Comparison of conservative and consistent approaches for the coupling of non-matching meshes. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 197(49):4284–4297CrossRefMATH
12.
Bottasso C, Campagnolo F, Croce A, Tibaldi C (2013) Optimization-based study of bend-twist coupled rotor blades for passive and integrated passive/active load alleviation. Wind Energy 16(8):1149–1166
13.
Brenner SC, Scott R (2008) The mathematical theory of finite element methods, vol 15. Springer, New YorkMATH
14.
Chen H, Yu W, Capellaro M (2010) A critical assessment of computer tools for calculating composite wind turbine blade properties. Wind Energy 13(6):497–516CrossRef
15.
Cichosz T, Bischoff M (2011) Consistent treatment of boundaries with mortar contact formulations using dual lagrange multipliers. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 200(9):1317–1332MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
16.
Cordero-Gracia M, Gómez M, Valero E (2014) A radial basis function algorithm for simplified fluid-structure data transfer. Int J Numer Methods Eng 99(12):888–905MathSciNetCrossRef
17.
De Rosis A, Falcucci G, Ubertini S, Ubertini F (2013) A coupled lattice boltzmann-finite element approach for two-dimensional fluid-structure interaction. Comput Fluids 86:558–568MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
18.
Degroote J, Bruggeman P, Haelterman R, Vierendeels J (2008) Stability of a coupling technique for partitioned solvers in FSI applications. Comput truct 86(23):2224–2234CrossRef
19.
Farhat C, Lesoinne M, Le Tallec P (1998) Load and motion transfer algorithms for fluid/structure interaction problems with non-matching discrete interfaces: momentum and energy conservation, optimal discretization and application to aeroelasticity. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 157(1):95–114MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
20.
Farhat C, Van der Zee KG, Geuzaine P (2006) Provably second-order time-accurate loosely-coupled solution algorithms for transient nonlinear computational aeroelasticity. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 195(17):1973–2001MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
21.
Felippa C, Haugen B (2005) A unified formulation of small-strain corotational finite elements: I. theory. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 194(21):2285–2335CrossRefMATH
22.
Felippa C, Park K, Ross M (2010) A classification of interface treatments for FSI. In: Bungartz H-J, Mehl M, Schäfer M (eds) Fluid structure interaction II. Springer, Berlin
23.
Fernández MÁ, Moubachir M (2005) A Newton method using exact Jacobians for solving fluid-structure coupling. Comput Struct 83(2):127–142CrossRef
24.
Foley JD, van Dam A, Feiner SK, Hughes JF (1990) Computer graphics: principles and practice, 2nd edn. Addison-Wesley, ReadingMATH
25.
Hansen MOL, Sørensen JN, Voutsinas S, Sørensen N, Madsen HA (2006) State of the art in wind turbine aerodynamics and aeroelasticity. Prog Aerosp Sci 42(4):285–330CrossRef
26.
Hsu MC, Akkerman I, Bazilevs Y (2014) Finite element simulation of wind turbine aerodynamics: validation study using NREL Phase VI experiment. Wind Energy 17(3):461–481CrossRef
27.
Hsu MC, Bazilevs Y (2012) Fluid-structure interaction modeling of wind turbines: simulating the full machine. Comput Mech 50(6):821–833MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
28.
Jaiman R, Jiao X, Geubelle P, Loth E (2006) Conservative load transfer along curved fluid-solid interface with non-matching meshes. J Comput Phys 218(1):372–397CrossRefMATH
29.
Kindmann R, Kraus M (2004) Steel structures: sesign using FEM. Ernst & Sohn, Berlin
30.
Klöppel T, Popp A, Küttler U, Wall WA (2011) Fluid-structure interaction for non-conforming interfaces based on a dual mortar formulation. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 200(45):3111–3126MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
31.
Krenk S (2009) Non-linear modeling and analysis of solids and structures. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefMATH
32.
Küttler U, Wall WA (2009) Vector extrapolation for strong coupling fluid-structure interaction solvers. J Appl Mech 76(2):021205CrossRef
33.
Li Z, Vu-Quoc L (2010) A mixed co-rotational 3D beam element formulation for arbitrarily large rotations. Adv Steel Constr 6(2):767–787
34.
Malcolm DJ, Laird DL (2007) Extraction of equivalent beam properties from blade models. Wind Energy 10(2):135–157CrossRef
35.
Michler C, Van Brummelen E, De Borst R (2005) An interface Newton–Krylov solver for fluid-structure interaction. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 47(10–11):1189–1195CrossRefMATH
36.
Mittal S, Tezduyar TE (1995) Parallel finite element simulation of 3D incompressible flows: fluid-structure interactions. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 21(10):933–953CrossRefMATH
37.
Muja M, Lowe DG (2014) Scalable nearest neighbor algorithms for high dimensional data. Pattern Anal Mach Intell IEEE Trans 36:2227–2240CrossRef
38.
Palacios RS, Cesnik C (2008) Geometrically nonlinear theory of composite beams with deformable cross sections. AIAA J 46(2):439–450CrossRef
39.
Patil MJ, Hodges DH, S Cesnik CE (2001) Nonlinear aeroelasticity and flight dynamics of high-altitude long-endurance aircraft. J Aircr 38(1):88–94CrossRef
40.
Piperno S, Farhat C (2001) Partitioned procedures for the transient solution of coupled aeroelastic problems-Part II: energy transfer analysis and three-dimensional applications. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 190(24):3147–3170CrossRefMATH
41.
Popp A, Seitz A, Gee MW, Wall WA (2013) Improved robustness and consistency of 3D contact algorithms based on a dual mortar approach. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 264:67–80MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
42.
Press W, Teukolsky S, Vetterline W, Flannery BP (2007) Numerical recipes 3rd edition: the art of scientific computing. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeMATH
43.
Puso MA (2004) A 3D mortar method for solid mechanics. Int J Numer Methods Eng 59(3):315–336CrossRefMATH
44.
Puso MA, Laursen TA (2004) A mortar segment-to-segment frictional contact method for large deformations. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 193(45):4891–4913MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
45.
Sicklinger S (2014) Stabilized co-simulation of coupled problems including fields and signals. Ph.D. thesis, Technische Universität München
46.
Sicklinger S, Lerch C, Wüchner R, Bletzinger KU (2015) Fully coupled co-simulation of a wind turbine emergency brake maneuver. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 144:134–145CrossRef
47.
Smith MJ, Cesnik CE, Hodges DH (2000) Evaluation of some data transfer algorithms for noncontiguous meshes. J Aerosp Eng 13(2):52–58CrossRef
48.
Streiner S (2011) Beitrag zur numerischen Simulation der Aerodynamik und Aeroelastik großer Windkraftanlagen mit horizontaler Achse. Verlag Dr. Hut
49.
Takizawa K, Henicke B, Tezduyar TE, Hsu MC, Bazilevs Y (2011) Stabilized space-time computation of wind-turbine rotor aerodynamics. Comput Mech 48(3):333–344CrossRefMATH
50.
Takizawa K, Spielman T, Tezduyar TE (2011) Space-time FSI modeling and dynamical analysis of spacecraft parachutes and parachute clusters. Comput Mech 48(3):345–364CrossRefMATH
51.
Tezduyar T, Behr M, Liou J (1992) A new strategy for finite element computations involving moving boundaries and interfaces-the deforming-spatial-domain/space-time procedure: I. the concept and the preliminary numerical tests. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 94(3):339–351MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
52.
Tezduyar T, Behr M, Mittal S, Liou J (1992) A new strategy for finite element computations involving moving boundaries and interfaces-the deforming-spatial-domain/space-time procedure: II. computation of free-surface flows, two-liquid flows, and flows with drifting cylinders. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 94(3):353–371MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
53.
Tezduyar T, Osawa Y (2001) Fluid-structure interactions of a parachute crossing the far wake of an aircraft. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 191(6):717–726CrossRefMATH
54.
Tezduyar TE (1992) Stabilized finite element formulations for incompressible flow computations. Academic Press, San DiegoMATH
55.
Tezduyar TE, Sathe S (2004) Enhanced-discretization space-time technique (EDSTT). Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 193(15):1385–1401MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
56.
Tezduyar TE, Sathe S, Keedy R, Stein K (2006) Space-time finite element techniques for computation of fluid-structure interactions. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 195(17):2002–2027MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
57.
Tezduyar TE, Sathe S, Schwaab M, Pausewang J, Christopher J, Crabtree J (2008) Fluid-structure interaction modeling of ringsail parachutes. Comput Mech 43(1):133–142CrossRefMATH
58.
Tezduyar TE, Sathe S, Stein K (2006) Solution techniques for the fully discretized equations in computation of fluid-structure interactions with the space-time formulations. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 195(41):5743–5753MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
59.
Unger R, Haupt MC, Horst P (2007) Application of lagrange multipliers for coupled problems in fluid and structural interactions. Comput Struct 85(11):796–809MathSciNetCrossRef
60.
Varello A, Demasi L, Carrera E, Giunta G (2010) An improved beam formulation for aeroelastic applications. In: Proceedings of the 51st AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, pp 12–15
61.
Wohlmuth BI (2000) A mortar finite element method using dual spaces for the lagrange multiplier. SIAM J Numer Anal 38(3):989–1012MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
62.
Wüchner R, Kupzok A, Bletzinger KU (2007) A framework for stabilized partitioned analysis of thin membrane-wind interaction. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 54(6–8):945–963MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
63.
Wunderlich W, Kiener G (2004) Statik der Stabtragwerke. Vieweg+Teubner Verlag, BerlinCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Assessment and improvement of mapping algorithms for non-matching meshes and geometries in computational FSI
verfasst von
Tianyang Wang
Roland Wüchner
Stefan Sicklinger
Kai-Uwe Bletzinger
Publikationsdatum
01.05.2016
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Computational Mechanics / Ausgabe 5/2016
Print ISSN: 0178-7675
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0924
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-016-1262-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2016

Computational Mechanics 5/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Original Paper

Homogenization techniques for the analysis of porous SMA

Original Paper

A peridynamic model for the nonlinear static analysis of truss and tensegrity structures

Original Paper

Numerical modeling of undersea acoustics using a partition of unity method with plane waves enrichment

Original Paper

Stabilized tetrahedral elements for crystal plasticity finite element analysis overcoming volumetric locking

Original Paper

Stable and flux-conserved meshfree formulation to model shocks

Original Paper

On the accuracy of numerical integration over the unit sphere applied to full network models

Neuer Inhalt

    Bildnachweise