nach oben

Cellulose

Erschienen in:

20.08.2018 | Original Paper

Bacterial cellulose nanofiber-based films incorporating gelatin hydrolysate from tilapia skin: production, characterization and cytotoxicity assessment

Erschienen in: Cellulose | Ausgabe 10/2018

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

In this work, films based on bacterial cellulose nanofibers (BCNFs) incorporating gelatin hydrolysate (GH) from tilapia skin were produced. The effect of plasticizer (sorbitol or glycerol) and GH incorporation was evaluated on the physical–chemical and optical properties of films. BCNFs were produced using bacterial cellulose obtained from Hestrin and Schramm (HS) medium (BCNF-HS) or cashew apple juice (BCNF-CM), which was studied as an alternative to HS. Films with sorbitol showed the best properties and were selected for further characterization, using 40% (w/w) of BCNF-HS, 40% (w/w) of GH and 20% (w/w) of sorbitol (BCNF-HS-S-GH films). These films exhibited an antioxidant activity of 7.8 µmols Trolox Eq/g film, a water vapor permeability (WVP) of 1.6 g.mm/kPa.h.m² and an Young’s modulus of 0.57 GPa. Films produced with BCNFs obtained from cashew apple juice revealed enhanced tensile strength, elongation at break, and thermal stability. Caco-2 cells’ viability after incubation with BCNF-based films incorporating GH was evaluated and showed non-cytotoxicity, reinforcing the safety of the developed materials and their potential use in food applications.

Graphical abstract

Vorheriger Artikel Multifunctional cellulose-based air filters with high loadings of metal–organic frameworks prepared by in situ growth method for gas adsorption and antibacterial applications

Nächster Artikel Enabling direct laser writing of cellulose-based submicron architectures

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Ahmed SA, Gogal RM, Walsh JE (1994) A new rapid and simple non-radioactive assay to monitor and determine the proliferation of lymphocytes: an alternative to [3H] thymidine incorporation assay. J Immunol Methods 170:211–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1759(94)90396-4 CrossRefPubMed

Albuquerque PBS, Cerqueira MA, Vicente AA et al (2017) Immobilization of bioactive compounds in Cassia grandis galactomannan-based films: influence on physicochemical properties. Int J Biol Macromol 96:727–735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.12.081 CrossRefPubMed

Anthis NJ, Clore GM (2013) Sequence-specific determination of protein and peptide concentrations by absorbance at 205 nm. Protein Sci 22:851–858. https://doi.org/10.1002/pro.2253 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

ASTM (1989) Standard test methods for water vapor transmission of materials E96-80. In: Annual book of American Standard Testing Methods. ASTM, Philadelphia

ASTM (1997) Standard test method for tensile properties of thin plastic sheeting. D882. In: Annual book of American Standard Testing Methods. ASTM, Philadelphia. pp 162–170

Atarés L, Chiralt A (2016) Essential oils as additives in biodegradable films and coatings for active food packaging. Trends Food Sci Technol 48:51–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2015.12.001 CrossRef

Azeredo HMC, Mattoso LHC, Avena BRJ et al (2010) Nanocellulose reinforced chitosan composite films as affected by nanofiller loading and plasticizer content. J Food Sci 75:N1–N7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-3841.2009.01386.x CrossRefPubMed

Baldwin EA, Hagenmaier RD, Bai J (2012) Edible coatings and films to improve food quality. CRC Press, Boca Raton

Bauer AK, Dwyer NLD, Hankin JA et al (2001) The lung tumor promoter, butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT), causes chronic inflammation in promotion-sensitive BALB/cByJ mice but not in promotion-resistant CXB4 mice. Toxicology 169:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-483X(01)00475-9 CrossRefPubMed

Benavides S, Villalobos CR, Reyes JEE (2012) Physical, mechanical and antibacterial properties of alginate film: effect of the crosslinking degree and oregano essential oil concentration. J Food Eng 110:232–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2011.05.023 CrossRef

Bertuzzi MA, Castro Vidaurre EF, Armada M, Gottifredi JC (2007) Water vapor permeability of edible starch based films. J Food Eng 80:972–978. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2006.07.016 CrossRef

Campano C, Balea A, Blanco A, Negro C (2016) Enhancement of the fermentation process and properties of bacterial cellulose: a review. Cellulose 23:57–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-015-0802-0 CrossRef

Cao N, Yang X, Fu Y (2009) Effects of various plasticizers on mechanical and water vapor barrier properties of gelatin films. Food Hydrocoll 23:729–735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2008.07.017 CrossRef

Cerqueira MA, Souza BWSS, Teixeira JA, Vicente AA (2012a) Effect of glycerol and corn oil on physicochemical properties of polysaccharide films—a comparative study. Food Hydrocoll 27:175–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2011.07.007 CrossRef

Cerqueira MA, Souza BWS, Teixeira JA, Vicente AA (2012b) Effects of interactions between the constituents of chitosan-edible films on their physical properties. Food Bioprocess Technol 5:3181–3192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-011-0663-y CrossRef

Chawla PR, Bajaj IB, Survase SA, Singhal RS (2009) Microbial cellulose: fermentative production and applications prashant. Food Technol Biotechnol 47:107–124

Chi CF, Wang B, Wang YM et al (2015) Isolation and characterization of three antioxidant peptides from protein hydrolysate of bluefin leatherjacket (Navodon septentrionalis) heads. J Funct Foods 12:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jff.2014.10.027 CrossRef

Ciriminna R, Pantaleo G, Mattina R, Pagliaro M (2014) Thermogravimetric investigation of sol–gel microspheres doped with aqueous glycerol. Sustain Chem Process 2:26. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40508-014-0026-x CrossRef

Coelho CCS, Michelin M, Cerqueira MA et al (2018) Cellulose nanocrystals from grape pomace: production, properties and cytotoxicity assessment. Carbohydr Polym 192:327–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.03.023 CrossRefPubMed

Coma V (2008) Bioactive packaging technologies for extended shelf life of meat-based products. Meat Sci 78:90–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2007.07.035 CrossRefPubMed

Csiszár E, Nagy S (2017) A comparative study on cellulose nanocrystals extracted from bleached cotton and flax and used for casting films with glycerol and sorbitol plasticisers. Carbohydr Polym 174:740–749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.06.103 CrossRefPubMed

Deepa B, Abraham E, Pothan L et al (2016) Biodegradable nanocomposite films based on sodium alginate and cellulose nanofibrils. Materials (Basel) 9:50. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma9010050 CrossRef

Duarte EB, das Chagas BS, Andrade FK et al (2015) Production of hydroxyapatite–bacterial cellulose nanocomposites from agroindustrial wastes. Cellulose 22:3177–3187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-015-0734-8 CrossRef

Farhan A, Hani NM (2017) Characterization of edible packaging films based on semi-refined kappa-carrageenan plasticized with glycerol and sorbitol. Food Hydrocoll 64:48–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2016.10.034 CrossRef

Ferreira CO, Nunes CA, Delgadillo I, Silva JAL (2009) Characterization of chitosan–whey protein films at acid pH. Food Res Int 42:807–813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2009.03.005 CrossRef

Fukuzumi H, Saito T, Iwata T et al (2009) Transparent and high gas barrier films of cellulose nanofibers prepared by TEMPO-mediated oxidation. Biomacromol 10:162–165. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm801065u CrossRef

Fukuzumi H, Saito T, Okita Y, Isogai A (2010) Thermal stabilization of TEMPO-oxidized cellulose. Polym Degrad Stab 95:1502–1508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2010.06.015 CrossRef

Gao C, Yan T, Du J et al (2014) Introduction of broad spectrum antibacterial properties to bacterial cellulose nanofibers via immobilising ε-polylysine nanocoatings. Food Hydrocoll 36:204–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2013.09.015 CrossRef

Gea S, Reynolds CT, Roohpour N et al (2011) Investigation into the structural, morphological, mechanical and thermal behaviour of bacterial cellulose after a two-step purification process. Bioresour Technol 102:9105–9110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.04.077 CrossRefPubMed

Genskowsky E, Puente L, Erez-Alvarez JP et al (2015) Assessment of antibacterial and antioxidant properties of chitosan edible films incorporated with maqui berry (Aristotelia chilensis). LWT—Food Sci Technol 64:1057–1062. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2015.07.026 CrossRef

Gómez SA, Marcilla A, Beltran M et al (2012) Study of the oxidative pyrolysis of tobacco–sorbitol–saccharose mixtures in the presence of MCM-41. Thermochim Acta 530:87–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TCA.2011.12.008 CrossRef

Gosslau A (2016) Assessment of food toxicology. Food Sci Hum Wellness 5:103–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fshw.2016.05.003 CrossRef

Han JH, Gennadios A (2005) Edible films and coatings. A review. Innov Food Packag. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012311632-1/50047-4 CrossRef

Hermansyah H, Carissa R, Anisa F, et al (2013) Preparation of the edible biocomposite film gelatin/bacterial cellulose microcrystal (BCMC): variation of matrix concentration, filler, and sonication time. In: Advanced Materials Research. Trans Tech Publications, pp 287–293. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.789.287

Hestrin S, Schramm M (1954) Synthesis of cellulose by Acetobacter xylinum. II. Preparation of freeze-dried cells capable of polymerizing glucose to cellulose. Biochem J 58:345–352. https://doi.org/10.1042/bj0580345 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Hoque MS, Benjakul S, Prodpran T (2011) Effects of partial hydrolysis and plasticizer content on the properties of film from cuttlefish (Sepia pharaonis) skin gelatin. Food Hydrocoll 25:82–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2010.05.008 CrossRef

Isogai A, Saito T, Fukuzumi H (2011) TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibers. Nanoscale 3:71–85. https://doi.org/10.1039/C0NR00583E CrossRefPubMed

Jahan F, Kumar V, Saxena RK (2017) Distillery effluent as a potential medium for bacterial cellulose production: a biopolymer of great commercial importance. Bioresour Technol 250:922–926. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.09.094 CrossRefPubMed

Jozala AF, Novaes LCL, Lopes AM et al (2016) Bacterial nanocellulose production and application: a 10-year overview. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 100:2063–2072. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00253-015-7243-4 CrossRefPubMed

Kargarzh H, Mariano M, Huange J et al (2017) Recent developments on nanocellulose reinforced polymer nanocomposites: a review. Polymer (Guildf) 132:368–393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2017.09.043 CrossRef

Kjeldahl J (1883) Neue methode zur bestimmung des stickstoffs in organischen Körpern. Zeitschrift für. Anal Chemie 22:366–382. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01338151 CrossRef

Lavoine N, Desloges I, Dufresne A, Bras J (2012) Microfibrillated cellulose—its barrier properties and applications in cellulosic materials: a review. Carbohydr Polym 90:735–764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.05.026 CrossRefPubMed

Lima HLS, Nascimento ES, Andrade FK et al (2017) Bacterial Cellulose Production by Komagataeibacter hansenii ATCC 23769 Using Sisal Juice—an agroindustry waste. Braz J Chem Eng 34:671–680. https://doi.org/10.1590/0104-6632.20170343s20150514 CrossRef

Lin Q, Zheng Y, Wang G et al (2015a) Protein adsorption behaviors of carboxymethylated bacterial cellulose membranes. Int J Biol Macromol 73:264–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2014.11.011 CrossRefPubMed

Lin SB, Chen CC, Chen LC, Chen HH (2015b) The bioactive composite film prepared from bacterial cellulose and modified by hydrolyzed gelatin peptide. J Biomater Appl 29:1428–1438. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885328214568799 CrossRefPubMed

Martínez AO, Chamorro S, Brenes A (2015) Protein hydrolysates from animal processing by-products as a source of bioactive molecules with interest in animal feeding: a review. Food Res Int 73:204–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2015.04.005 CrossRef

Mohammadkazemi F, Azin M, Ashori A (2015) Production of bacterial cellulose using different carbon sources and culture media. Carbohydr Polym 117:518–523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.10.008 CrossRefPubMed

Montero PGM, Guillén MCG, Caballero MEL, Cánovas GVB (2017) Edible films and coatings: fundamentals and applications. CRC Press, Boca Raton

Moreno O, Atarés L, Chiralt A (2015) Effect of the incorporation of antimicrobial/antioxidant proteins on the properties of potato starch films. Carbohydr Polym 133:353–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.07.047 CrossRefPubMed

Mu C, Guo J, Li X et al (2012) Preparation and properties of dialdehyde carboxymethyl cellulose crosslinked gelatin edible films. Food Hydrocoll 27:22–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2011.09.005 CrossRef

Nascimento ES, Lima HLS, Araújo Barroso MK et al (2016) Mesquite (Prosopis juliflora (Sw.)) extract is an alternative nutrient source for bacterial cellulose production. J Biobased Mater Bioenergy 10:63–70. https://doi.org/10.1166/jbmb.2016.1568 CrossRef

Nguyen VT, Gidley MJ, Dykes GA (2008) Potential of a nisin-containing bacterial cellulose film to inhibit Listeria monocytogenes on processed meats. Food Microbiol 25:471–478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2008.01.004 CrossRefPubMed

Nociari MM, Shalev A, Benias P, Russo C (1998) A novel one-step, highly sensitive fluorometric assay to evaluate cell-mediated cytotoxicity. J Immunol Methods 213:157–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1759(98)00028-3 CrossRefPubMed

Nowak A, Sójka Michałand Klewicka E, Lipińska L et al (2017) Ellagitannins from Rubus idaeus L. exert geno-and cytotoxic effects against human colon adenocarcinoma cell line caco-2. J Agric Food Chem. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.6b05387 CrossRefPubMed

Nuanmano S, Prodpran T, Benjakul S (2015) Potential use of gelatin hydrolysate as plasticizer in fish myofibrillar protein film. Food Hydrocoll 47:61–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2015.01.005 CrossRef

Nur Hanani ZA, McNamara J, Roos YH, Kerry JP (2013) Effect of plasticizer content on the functional properties of extruded gelatin-based composite films. Food Hydrocoll 31:264–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FOODHYD.2012.10.009 CrossRef

Olivas GI, Cánovas GVB (2008) Alginate–calcium films: water vapor permeability and mechanical properties as affected by plasticizer and relative humidity. LWT—Food Sci Technol 41:359–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2007.02.015 CrossRef

Padrão J, Gonçalves S, Silva JP et al (2016) Bacterial cellulose-lactoferrin as an antimicrobial edible packaging. Food Hydrocoll 58:126–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2016.02.019 CrossRef

Pei Y, Yang J, Liu P et al (2013) Fabrication, properties and bioapplications of cellulose/collagen hydrolysate composite films. Carbohydr Polym 92:1752–1760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.11.029 CrossRefPubMed

Perez EPJ, de Fátima Ferreira Soares N, dos Reis Coimbra JS et al (2012) Bioactive Peptides: synthesis, Properties, and Applications in the Packaging and Preservation of Food. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf 11:187–204. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-4337.2011.00179.x CrossRef

Piñeros HD, Jaramillo CM, Córdoba AL, Goyanes S (2017) Edible cassava starch films carrying rosemary antioxidant extracts for potential use as active food packaging. Food Hydrocoll 63:488–495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2016.09.034 CrossRef

Podshivalov A, Zakharova M, Glazacheva E, Uspenskaya M (2017) Gelatin/potato starch edible biocomposite films: correlation between morphology and physical properties. Carbohydr Polym 157:1162–1172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.10.079 CrossRefPubMed

Rhim JW (2004) Physical and mechanical properties of water resistant sodium alginate films. LWT—Food Sci Technol 37:323–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2003.09.008 CrossRef

Rodionova G, Saito T, Lenes M et al (2012) Mechanical and oxygen barrier properties of films prepared from fibrillated dispersions of TEMPO-oxidized Norway spruce and Eucalyptus pulps. Cellulose 19:705–711. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-012-9664-x CrossRef

Saito T, Nishiyama Y, Putaux JL et al (2006) Homogeneous suspensions of individualized microfibrils from TEMPO-catalyzed oxidation of native cellulose. Biomacromol 7:1687–1691. https://doi.org/10.1021/BM060154S CrossRef

Saito T, Kimura S, Nishiyama Y, Isogai A (2007) Cellulose nanofibers prepared by TEMPO-mediated oxidation of native cellulose. Biomacromol 8:2485–2491. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm0703970 CrossRef

Salgado PR, Ortiz CM, Musso YS et al (2015) Edible films and coatings containing bioactives. Curr Opin Food Sci 5:86–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cofs.2015.09.004 CrossRef

Samaranayaka AGP, Li CECY (2011) Food-derived peptidic antioxidants: a review of their production, assessment, and potential applications. J Funct Foods 3:229–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jff.2011.05.006 CrossRef

Sampaio APC, Filho MSMS, Castro ALA, Figueirêdo MCB (2017) Life cycle assessment from early development stages: the case of gelatin extracted from tilapia residues. Int J Life Cycle Assess 22:767–783. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1179-5 CrossRef

Santos TM, Filho MSMS, Caceres CA et al (2014) Fish gelatin films as affected by cellulose whiskers and sonication. Food Hydrocoll 41:113–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2014.04.001 CrossRef

Schmid M, Hinz LV, Wild F, Noller K (2013) Effects of hydrolysed whey proteins on the techno-functional characteristics of whey protein-based films. Materials (Basel) 6:927–940. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma6030927 CrossRef

Segal L, Creely JJ, Martin AE, Conrad CM (1959) An empirical method for estimating the degree of crystallinity of native cellulose using the X-ray diffractometer. Text Res J 29:786–794. https://doi.org/10.1177/004051755902901003 CrossRef

Shi Z, Zhang Y, Phillips GO, Yang G (2014) Utilization of bacterial cellulose in food. Food Hydrocoll 35:539–545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2013.07.012 CrossRef

Sila A, Bougatef A (2016) Antioxidant peptides from marine by-products: isolation, identification and application in food systems. A review. J Funct Foods 21:10–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jff.2015.11.007 CrossRef

Silveira MS, Fontes CPML, Guilherme AA et al (2012) Cashew apple juice as substrate for lactic acid production. Food Bioprocess Technol 5:947–953. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-010-0382-9 CrossRef

Soni B, Hassan EB, Schilling MW, Mahmoud B (2016) Transparent bionanocomposite films based on chitosan and TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibers with enhanced mechanical and barrier properties. Carbohydr Polym 151:779–789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.06.022 CrossRefPubMed

Sun J, Furio L, Mecheri R et al (2015) Pancreatic β-cells limit autoimmune diabetes via an immunoregulatory antimicrobial peptide expressed under the influence of the gut microbiota. Immunity 43:304–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2015.07.013 CrossRefPubMed

Syverud K, Stenius P (2009) Strength and barrier properties of MFC films. Cellulose 16:75–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-008-9244-2 CrossRef

Thomazine M, Carvalho RA, Sobral PJA (2006) Physical properties of gelatin films plasticized by blends of glycerol and sorbitol. J Food Sci 70:E172–E176. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2005.tb07132.x CrossRef

Tongnuanchan P, Benjakul S, Prodpran T (2012) Properties and antioxidant activity of fish skin gelatin film incorporated with citrus essential oils. Food Chem 134:1571–1579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.03.094 CrossRefPubMed

Tongnuanchan P, Benjakul S, Prodpran T, Nilsuwan K (2015) Emulsion film based on fish skin gelatin and palm oil: physical, structural and thermal properties. Food Hydrocoll 48:248–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2015.02.025 CrossRef

Tsalagkas D, Lagaňa R, Poljanšek I et al (2016) Fabrication of bacterial cellulose thin films self-assembled from sonochemically prepared nanofibrils and its characterization. Ultrason Sonochem 28:136–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2015.07.010 CrossRefPubMed

Ullah H, Santos HA, Khan T (2016) Applications of bacterial cellulose in food, cosmetics and drug delivery. Cellulose 23:2291–2314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-016-0986-y CrossRef

Wu CN, Cheng KC (2017) Strong, thermal-stable, flexible, and transparent films by self-assembled TEMPO-oxidized bacterial cellulose nanofibers. Cellulose 24:269–283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-016-1114-8 CrossRef

Xu M, McCanna DJ, Sivak JG (2015) Use of the viability reagent PrestoBlue in comparison with alamarBlue and MTT to assess the viability of human corneal epithelial cells. J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods 71:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vascn.2014.11.003 CrossRefPubMed

Yamada Y, Yukphan P, Vu HTL et al (2012) Subdivision of the genus Gluconacetobacter Yamada, Hoshino and Ishikawa 1998: the proposal of Komagatabacter gen. nov., for strains accommodated to the Gluconacetobacter xylinus group in the α-Proteobacteria. Ann Microbiol 62:849–859. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13213-011-0288-4 CrossRef

Yang JII, Liang WSS, Chow CJJ, Siebert KJ (2009) Process for the production of tilapia retorted skin gelatin hydrolysates with optimized antioxidative properties. Process Biochem 44:1152–1157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2009.06.013 CrossRef

Yunos MZB, Rahman WAWA (2011) Effect of glycerol on performance rice straw/starch based polymer. J Appl Sci 11:2456–2459. https://doi.org/10.3923/jas.2011.2456.2459 CrossRef

Zhang SB (2016) In vitro antithrombotic activities of peanut protein hydrolysates. Food Chem 202:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.01.108 CrossRefPubMed

Zhijiang C, Guang Y (2010) Bacterial cellulose/collagen composite: characterization and first evaluation of cytocompatibility. J Appl Polym Sci 120:2938–2944. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.33318 CrossRef

Titel: Bacterial cellulose nanofiber-based films incorporating gelatin hydrolysate from tilapia skin: production, characterization and cytotoxicity assessment
Publikationsdatum: 20.08.2018
Erschienen in: Cellulose / Ausgabe 10/2018
Print ISSN: 0969-0239
Elektronische ISSN: 1572-882X
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-018-1983-0

Springer Professional

Abstract

Graphical abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 10/2018

Morphology control for tunable optical properties of cellulose nanofibrils films

Effect of softener in home laundering of cotton fabric: a study of low-stress mechanical properties

Multifunctional cellulose-based air filters with high loadings of metal–organic frameworks prepared by in situ growth method for gas adsorption and antibacterial applications

Cellulose based multifunctional hybrid material for sequestering phosphate in stratified water purification columns

Kinetic and mechanism studies of the isothermal degradation of local chitin, chitosan and its biocomposite bentonite/chitosan

Production of high lignin-containing and lignin-free cellulose nanocrystals from wood