Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
MTZ-Fachkongress

Antriebe und Energiesysteme von morgen


Austausch von Automobil- und Energiewirtschaft

Am 14./15. Mai geht es in Chemnitz um die Mobilitätswende durch Elektro- und Wasserstofffahrzeuge.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Polymers Against Microorganisms Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2017 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

3. Chemical Approaches to Prepare Antimicrobial Polymers

verfasst von : Juan Rodríguez-Hernández

Erschienen in: Polymers against Microorganisms

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Until the early 1980s, low-molecular weight substances were mainly employed for their antimicrobial activity. However, the discovery of antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) carried out by dramatically changed this situation. This group demonstrated that macromolecular peptides were able to kill Gram-positive bacteria, Gram-negative bacteria, and fungi. AMPs have been extensively developed and today an Antimicrobial Peptide Database (APD). Based on this finding and around the same time antimicrobial polymers known under the name “polymer disinfectants” started to be investigated. As a result, studies on syntheses of polymeric biocides have been started to develop a new utilization field of polymer materials from 1980s. In particular, synthetic polymers have been widely investigated as a new molecular platform to create antimicrobial agents that are active against drug-resistant bacteria.
As will be depicted throughout this chapter, a variety of synthetic polymers with different chemical structures have been utilized to prepare antimicrobial polymers, and some polymers with high efficacy have been reported. In addition, a thorough analysis of the chemical characteristics of antimicrobial polymers and the different strategies to prepare them will be provided.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Bacterial Infections: Few Concepts
Nächstes Kapitel Nano-Micro Polymeric Structures with Antimicrobial Activity in Solution
Literatur
1.
Steiner H, et al. Sequence and specificity of two antibacterial proteins involved in insect immunity. Nature. 1981;292(5820):246–8.CrossRef
2.
Wang Z, Wang G. APD: the antimicrobial peptide database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32 suppl 1:D590–2.CrossRef
3.
Palermo EF, Kuroda K. Structural determinants of antimicrobial activity in polymers which mimic host defense peptides. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2010;87(5):1605–15.CrossRef
4.
Engler AC, et al. Emerging trends in macromolecular antimicrobials to fight multi-drug-resistant infections. Nano Today. 2012;7(3):201–22.CrossRef
5.
Kuroda K, Caputo GA. Antimicrobial polymers as synthetic mimics of host-defense peptides. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol. 2013;5(1):49–66.CrossRef
6.
Li P, et al. Antimicrobial macromolecules: synthesis methods and future applications. RSC Adv. 2012;2(10):4031–44.CrossRef
7.
Muñoz-Bonilla A, Fernández-García M. Polymeric materials with antimicrobial activity. Prog Polym Sci. 2012;37(2):281–339.CrossRef
8.
Thoma LM, Boles BR, Kuroda K. Cationic methacrylate polymers as topical antimicrobial agents against Staphylococcus aureus nasal colonization. Biomacromolecules. 2014;15(8):2933–43.CrossRef
9.
King A, et al. High antimicrobial effectiveness with low hemolytic and cytotoxic activity for PEG/quaternary copolyoxetanes. Biomacromolecules. 2014;15(2):456–67.CrossRef
10.
Liu R, et al. Tuning the biological activity profile of antibacterial polymers via subunit substitution pattern. J Am Chem Soc. 2014;136(11):4410–8.CrossRef
11.
Liu R, et al. Structure–activity relationships among antifungal nylon-3 polymers: identification of materials active against drug-resistant strains of Candida albicans. J Am Chem Soc. 2014;136(11):4333–42.CrossRef
12.
Stratton TR, Applegate BM, Youngblood JP. Effect of steric hindrance on the properties of antibacterial and biocompatible copolymers. Biomacromolecules. 2011;12(1):50–6.CrossRef
13.
Thaker HD, et al. Role of amphiphilicity in the design of synthetic mimics of antimicrobial peptides with gram-negative activity. ACS Med Chem Lett. 2013;4(5):481–5.CrossRef
14.
Matsuzaki K. Control of cell selectivity of antimicrobial peptides. Biochim Biophys Acta Biomembr. 2009;1788(8):1687–92.CrossRef
15.
Kenawy E-R, Worley SD, Broughton R. The chemistry and applications of antimicrobial polymers: a state-of-the-art review. Biomacromolecules. 2007;8(5):1359–84.CrossRef
16.
Timofeeva L, Kleshcheva N. Antimicrobial polymers: mechanism of action, factors of activity, and applications. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011;89(3):475–92.CrossRef
17.
Siedenbiedel F, Tiller JC. Antimicrobial polymers in solution and on surfaces: overview and functional principles. Polymers. 2012;4(1):46–71.CrossRef
18.
Tiller JC, et al. Designing surfaces that kill bacteria on contact. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98(11):5981–5.CrossRef
19.
Tiller JC, et al. Polymer surfaces derivatized with poly(vinyl-N-hexylpyridinium) kill airborne and waterborne bacteria. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2002;79(4):465–71.CrossRef
20.
Park ES, et al. Antibacterial activities of polystyrene-block-poly(4-vinyl pyridine) and poly(styrene-random-4-vinyl pyridine). Eur Polym J. 2004;40(12):2819–22.CrossRef
21.
Li G, Shen J. A study of pyridinium‐type functional polymers. IV. Behavioral features of the antibacterial activity of insoluble pyridinium‐type polymers. J Appl Polym Sci. 2000;78(3):676–84.CrossRef
22.
Anderson EB, Long TE. Imidazole-and imidazolium-containing polymers for biology and material science applications. Polymer. 2010;51(12):2447–54.CrossRef
23.
Soykan C, Coşkun R, Delibaş A. Microbial screening of copolymers of N‐vinylimidazole with phenacyl methacrylate: synthesis and monomer reactivity ratios. J Macromol Sci A. 2005;42(12):1603–19.CrossRef
24.
Gottenbos B, et al. Antimicrobial effects of positively charged surfaces on adhering gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2001;48(1):7–13.CrossRef
25.
Gottenbos B, et al. Positively charged biomaterials exert antimicrobial effects on gram-negative bacilli in rats. Biomaterials. 2003;24(16):2707–10.CrossRef
26.
Li G, Shen J, Zhu Y. A study of pyridinium‐type functional polymers. III. Preparation and characterization of insoluble pyridinium‐type polymers. J Appl Polym Sci. 2000;78(3):668–75.CrossRef
27.
Lu L, et al. Biocidal activity of a light-absorbing fluorescent conjugated polyelectrolyte. Langmuir. 2005;21(22):10154–9.CrossRef
28.
Chemburu S, et al. Light-induced biocidal action of conjugated polyelectrolytes supported on colloids. Langmuir. 2008;24(19):11053–62.CrossRef
29.
Corbitt TS, et al. Conjugated polyelectrolyte capsules: light-activated antimicrobial micro “Roach Motels”. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2008;1(1):48–52.CrossRef
30.
Wang Y, et al. Membrane perturbation activity of cationic phenylene ethynylene oligomers and polymers: selectivity against model bacterial and mammalian membranes. Langmuir. 2010;26(15):12509–14.CrossRef
31.
Corbitt TS, et al. Light and dark biocidal activity of cationic poly (arylene ethynylene) conjugated polyelectrolytes. Photochem Photobiol Sci. 2009;8(7):998–1005.CrossRef
32.
Xing C, et al. Conjugated polymer/porphyrin complexes for efficient energy transfer and improving light-activated antibacterial activity. J Am Chem Soc. 2009;131(36):13117–24.CrossRef
33.
Sauvet G, et al. Amphiphilic block and statistical siloxane copolymers with antimicrobial activity. J Polym Sci A Polym Chem. 2003;41(19):2939–48.CrossRef
34.
Mizerska U, et al. Polysiloxane cationic biocides with imidazolium salt (ImS) groups, synthesis and antibacterial properties. Eur Polym J. 2009;45(3):779–87.CrossRef
35.
Gao B, Zhang X, Zhu Y. Studies on the preparation and antibacterial properties of quaternized polyethyleneimine. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2007;18(5):531–44.CrossRef
36.
Pasquier N, et al. Amphiphilic branched polymers as antimicrobial agents. Macromol Biosci. 2008;8(10):903–15.CrossRef
37.
Pasquier N, et al. From multifunctionalized poly (ethylene imine)s toward antimicrobial coatings. Biomacromolecules. 2007;8(9):2874–82.CrossRef
38.
Abid C, et al. Synthesis and characterization of quaternary ammonium PEGDA dendritic copolymer networks for water disinfection. J Appl Polym Sci. 2010;116(3):1640–9.
39.
Chen CZ, et al. Quaternary ammonium functionalized poly (propylene imine) dendrimers as effective antimicrobials: structure–activity studies. Biomacromolecules. 2000;1(3):473–80.CrossRef
40.
Chen CZ, Cooper SL. Interactions between dendrimer biocides and bacterial membranes. Biomaterials. 2002;23(16):3359–68.CrossRef
41.
Ortega P, et al. Amine and ammonium functionalization of chloromethylsilane-ended dendrimers. Antimicrobial activity studies. Org Biomol Chem. 2008;6(18):3264–9.CrossRef
42.
Hoogenboom R. Poly (2‐oxazoline)s: a polymer class with numerous potential applications. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2009;48(43):7978–94.CrossRef
43.
Makino A, Kobayashi S. Chemistry of 2‐oxazolines: a crossing of cationic ring‐opening polymerization and enzymatic ring‐opening polyaddition. J Polym Sci A Polym Chem. 2010;48(6):1251–70.CrossRef
44.
Adams N, Schubert US. Poly (2-oxazolines) in biological and biomedical application contexts. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2007;59(15):1504–20.CrossRef
45.
Waschinski CJ, Tiller JC. Poly (oxazoline)s with telechelic antimicrobial functions. Biomacromolecules. 2005;6(1):235–43.CrossRef
46.
Waschinski CJ, et al. Influence of satellite groups on telechelic antimicrobial functions of polyoxazolines. Macromol Biosci. 2005;5(2):149–56.CrossRef
47.
Waschinski CJ, et al. Insights in the antibacterial action of poly (methyloxazoline)s with a biocidal end group and varying satellite groups. Biomacromolecules. 2008;9(7):1764–71.CrossRef
48.
Ikeda T, Yamaguchi H, Tazuke S. New polymeric biocides: synthesis and antibacterial activities of polycations with pendant biguanide groups. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1984;26(2):139–44.CrossRef
49.
Ikeda T, Tazuke S, Suzuki Y. Biologically active polycations. 4. Synthesis and antimicrobial activity of poly(trialkylvinylbenzylammonium chloride)s. Makromol Chem. 1984;185(5):869–76.CrossRef
50.
Gelman MA, et al. Biocidal activity of polystyrenes that are cationic by virtue of protonation. Org Lett. 2004;6(4):557–60.CrossRef
51.
Vigliotta G, et al. Modulating antimicrobial activity by synthesis: dendritic copolymers based on nonquaternized 2-(dimethylamino)ethyl methacrylate by Cu-mediated ATRP. Biomacromolecules. 2012;13(3):833–41.CrossRef
52.
Ornelas-Megiatto C, Wich PR, Fréchet JMJ. Polyphosphonium polymers for siRNA delivery: an efficient and nontoxic alternative to polyammonium carriers. J Am Chem Soc. 2012;134(4):1902–5.CrossRef
53.
Hemp ST, et al. Phosphonium-containing diblock copolymers for enhanced colloidal stability and efficient nucleic acid delivery. Biomacromolecules. 2012;13(8):2439–45.CrossRef
54.
Popa A, et al. Study of quaternary ‘onium’ salts grafted on polymers: antibacterial activity of quaternary phosphonium salts grafted on ‘gel-type’ styrene–divinylbenzene copolymers. React Funct Polym. 2003;55(2):151–8.CrossRef
55.
Li C, et al. Preparation and antimicrobial activity of quaternary phosphonium modified epoxidized natural rubber. Mater Lett. 2013;93:145–8.CrossRef
56.
Xue Y, et al. Novel quaternary phosphonium-type cationic polyacrylamide and elucidation of dual-functional antibacterial/antiviral activity. RSC Adv. 2014;4(87):46887–95.CrossRef
57.
Sun Y, Sun G. Novel refreshable N-halamine polymeric biocides: N-chlorination of aromatic polyamides. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2004;43(17):5015–20.CrossRef
58.
Hui F, Debiemme-Chouvy C. Antimicrobial N-halamine polymers and coatings: a review of their synthesis, characterization, and applications. Biomacromolecules. 2013;14(3):585–601.CrossRef
59.
Sun Y, et al. Novel refreshable N-halamine polymeric biocides containing imidazolidin-4-one derivatives. J Polym Sci A Polym Chem. 2001;39(18):3073–84.CrossRef
60.
Chen Z, Sun Y. N-halamine-based antimicrobial additives for polymers: preparation, characterization and antimicrobial activity. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2006;45(8):2634–40.CrossRef
61.
Guittard F, Geribaldi S. Highly fluorinated molecular organised systems: strategy and concept. J Fluor Chem. 2001;107(2):363–74.CrossRef
62.
Massi L, et al. Antimicrobial properties of highly fluorinated bis-ammonium salts. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2003;21(1):20–6.CrossRef
63.
Caillier L, et al. Polymerizable semi-fluorinated gemini surfactants designed for antimicrobial materials. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2009;332(1):201–7.CrossRef
64.
Thebault P, et al. Surface and antimicrobial properties of semi-fluorinated quaternary ammonium thiol surfactants potentially usable for self-assembled monolayers. J Fluor Chem. 2010;131(5):592–6.CrossRef
65.
Kugel AJ, et al. Combinatorial materials research applied to the development of new surface coatings XII: novel, environmentally friendly antimicrobial coatings derived from biocide-functional acrylic polyols and isocyanates. J Coat Technol Res. 2009;6(1):107–21.CrossRef
66.
Zasloff M. Antimicrobial peptides of multicellular organisms. Nature. 2002;415(6870):389–95.CrossRef
67.
Hancock REW, Sahl H-G. Antimicrobial and host-defense peptides as new anti-infective therapeutic strategies. Nat Biotech. 2006;24(12):1551–7.CrossRef
68.
Tew GN, et al. De novo design of biomimetic antimicrobial polymers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99(8):5110–4.CrossRef
69.
Findlay B, Zhanel GG, Schweizer F. Cationic amphiphiles, a new generation of antimicrobials inspired by the natural antimicrobial peptide scaffold. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010;54(10):4049–58.CrossRef
70.
Tossi A, Sandri L, Giangaspero A. Amphipathic, α-helical antimicrobial peptides. Pept Sci. 2000;55(1):4–30.CrossRef
71.
O’Neil KT, DeGrado WF. How calmodulin binds its targets: sequence independent recognition of amphiphilic α-helices. Trends Biochem Sci. 1990;15(2):59–64.CrossRef
72.
Oren Z, Shai Y. Mode of action of linear amphipathic α-helical antimicrobial peptides. Pept Sci. 1998;47(6):451–63.CrossRef
73.
Chen Y, et al. Rational design of α-helical antimicrobial peptides with enhanced activities and specificity/therapeutic index. J Biol Chem. 2005;280(13):12316–29.CrossRef
74.
Jiang Z, et al. Effects of hydrophobicity on the antifungal activity of α-helical antimicrobial peptides. Chem Biol Drug Des. 2008;72(6):483–95.CrossRef
75.
Jiang Z, et al. Effects of net charge and the number of positively charged residues on the biological activity of amphipathic α-helical cationic antimicrobial peptides. Pept Sci. 2008;90(3):369–83.CrossRef
76.
Martinek TA, Fülöp F. Side-chain control of β-peptide secondary structures. Eur J Biochem. 2003;270(18):3657–66.CrossRef
77.
Wiradharma N, et al. Synthetic cationic amphiphilic α-helical peptides as antimicrobial agents. Biomaterials. 2011;32(8):2204–12.CrossRef
78.
Blondelle SE, Houghten RA. Design of model amphipathic peptides having potent antimicrobial activities. Biochemistry. 1992;31(50):12688–94.CrossRef
79.
Zelezetsky I, et al. Controlled alteration of the shape and conformational stability of α-helical cell-lytic peptides: effect on mode of action and cell specificity. Biochem J. 2005;390(Pt 1):177–88.CrossRef
80.
Won A, et al. Effect of point mutations on the secondary structure and membrane interaction of antimicrobial peptide anoplin. J Phys Chem B. 2011;115(10):2371–9.CrossRef
81.
Gabriel GJ, Tew GN. Conformationally rigid proteomimetics: a case study in designing antimicrobial aryl oligomers. Org Biomol Chem. 2008;6(3):417–23.CrossRef
82.
Tew GN, et al. De novo design of antimicrobial polymers, foldamers, and small molecules: from discovery to practical applications. Acc Chem Res. 2009;43(1):30–9.CrossRef
83.
Liu D, et al. Nontoxic membrane-active antimicrobial arylamide oligomers. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2004;43(9):1158–62.CrossRef
84.
Ilker MF, et al. Tuning the hemolytic and antibacterial activities of amphiphilic polynorbornene derivatives. J Am Chem Soc. 2004;126(48):15870–5.CrossRef
85.
Jain A, et al. Antimicrobial polymers. Adv Healthc Mater. 2014;3(12):1969–85.CrossRef
86.
Hirayama M. The antimicrobial activity, hydrophobicity and toxicity of sulfonium compounds, and their relationship. Biocontrol Sci. 2011;16(1):23–31.CrossRef
87.
Ward M, et al. Antimicrobial activity of statistical polymethacrylic sulfopropylbetaines against gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria. J Appl Polym Sci. 2006;101(2):1036–41.CrossRef
88.
Mi L, Jiang S. Integrated antimicrobial and nonfouling zwitterionic polymers. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2014;53(7):1746–54.CrossRef
89.
Lowe A, et al. Acrylonitrile-based nitric oxide releasing melt-spun fibers for enhanced wound healing. Macromolecules. 2012;45(15):5894–900.CrossRef
90.
Marambio-Jones C, Hoek EV. A review of the antibacterial effects of silver nanomaterials and potential implications for human health and the environment. J Nanopart Res. 2010;12(5):1531–51.CrossRef
91.
Hetrick EM, et al. Bactericidal efficacy of nitric oxide-releasing silica nanoparticles. ACS Nano. 2008;2(2):235–46.CrossRef
92.
Zhang Y, Jiang J, Chen Y. Synthesis and antimicrobial activity of polymeric guanidine and biguanidine salts. Polymer. 1999;40(22):6189–98.CrossRef
93.
Feiertag P, et al. Structural characterization of biocidal oligoguanidines. Macromol Rapid Commun. 2003;24(9):567–70.CrossRef
94.
Albert M, et al. Structure–activity relationships of oligoguanidines influence of counterion, diamine, and average molecular weight on biocidal activities. Biomacromolecules. 2003;4(6):1811–7.CrossRef
95.
Wang Y, et al. Antimicrobial and hemolytic activities of copolymers with cationic and hydrophobic groups: a comparison of block and random copolymers. Macromol Biosci. 2011;11(11):1499–504.
96.
Locock KES, et al. Guanylated polymethacrylates: a class of potent antimicrobial polymers with low hemolytic activity. Biomacromolecules. 2013;14(11):4021–31.CrossRef
97.
Zhou C, et al. High potency and broad-spectrum antimicrobial peptides synthesized via ring-opening polymerization of α-aminoacid-N-carboxyanhydrides. Biomacromolecules. 2010;11(1):60–7.CrossRef
98.
Song A, et al. Antibacterial studies of cationic polymers with alternating, random, and uniform backbones. ACS Chem Biol. 2011;6(6):590–9.CrossRef
99.
Cheng C-Y, et al. Nature of interactions between PEO-PPO-PEO triblock copolymers and lipid membranes: (II) role of hydration dynamics revealed by dynamic nuclear polarization. Biomacromolecules. 2012;13(9):2624–33.CrossRef
100.
Kuroda K, Caputo GA, DeGrado WF. The role of hydrophobicity in the antimicrobial and hemolytic activities of polymethacrylate derivatives. Chemistry. 2009;15(5):1123–33. doi:10.​1002/​chem.​200801523.CrossRef
101.
Palermo EF, Sovadinova I, Kuroda K. Structural determinants of antimicrobial activity and biocompatibility in membrane-disrupting methacrylamide random copolymers. Biomacromolecules. 2009;10(11):3098–107.CrossRef
102.
Kuroda K, DeGrado WF. Amphiphilic polymethacrylate derivatives as antimicrobial agents. J Am Chem Soc. 2005;127(12):4128–9.CrossRef
103.
Mowery BP, et al. Mimicry of antimicrobial host-defense peptides by random copolymers. J Am Chem Soc. 2007;129(50):15474–6.CrossRef
104.
Lienkamp K, et al. Antimicrobial polymers prepared by ROMP with unprecedented selectivity: a molecular construction kit approach. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130(30):9836–43.CrossRef
105.
Eren T, et al. Antibacterial and hemolytic activities of quaternary pyridinium functionalized polynorbornenes. Macromol Chem Phys. 2008;209(5):516–24.CrossRef
106.
Sambhy V, Peterson BR, Sen A. Antibacterial and hemolytic activities of pyridinium polymers as a function of the spatial relationship between the positive charge and the pendant alkyl tail. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2008;47(7):1250–4.CrossRef
107.
Gabriel GJ, et al. Comparison of facially amphiphilic versus segregated monomers in the design of antibacterial copolymers. Chemistry. 2009;15(2):433–9.CrossRef
108.
Ganewatta MS, Tang C. Controlling macromolecular structures towards effective antimicrobial polymers. Polymer. 2015;63:A1–29.CrossRef
109.
Jiang Y, et al. Acid-activated antimicrobial random copolymers: a mechanism-guided design of antimicrobial peptide mimics. Macromolecules. 2013;46(10):3959–64.CrossRef
110.
Yang X, et al. Long hydrophilic-and-cationic polymers: a different pathway toward preferential activity against bacterial over mammalian membranes. Biomacromolecules. 2014;15(9):3267–77.CrossRef
111.
Oda Y, et al. Block versus random amphiphilic copolymers as antibacterial agents. Biomacromolecules. 2011;12(10):3581–91.CrossRef
112.
Ortega P, et al. Hyperbranched polymers versus dendrimers containing a carbosilane framework and terminal ammonium groups as antimicrobial agents. Org Biomol Chem. 2011;9(14):5238–48.CrossRef
113.
Young AW, et al. Structure and antimicrobial properties of multivalent short peptides. MedChemComm. 2011;2(4):308–14.CrossRef
114.
Liu Z, et al. Tuning the membrane selectivity of antimicrobial peptides by using multivalent design. ChemBioChem. 2007;8(17):2063–5.CrossRef
115.
Hou SY, et al. Antimicrobial dendrimer active against Escherichia coli biofilms. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2009;19(18):5478–81.CrossRef
116.
Wiradharma N, Liu S-Q, Yang Y-Y. Branched and 4-arm starlike α-helical peptide structures with enhanced antimicrobial potency and selectivity. Small. 2012;8(3):362–6.CrossRef
117.
Tulu M, et al. Synthesis, characterization and antimicrobial activity of water soluble dendritic macromolecules. Eur J Med Chem. 2009;44(3):1093–9.CrossRef
118.
Calabretta MK, et al. Antibacterial activities of poly(amidoamine) dendrimers terminated with amino and poly(ethylene glycol) groups. Biomacromolecules. 2007;8(6):1807–11.CrossRef
119.
Wang B, et al. Inhibition of bacterial growth and intramniotic infection in a guinea pig model of chorioamnionitis using PAMAM dendrimers. Int J Pharm. 2010;395(1–2):298–308.CrossRef
120.
Nonaka T, et al. Synthesis of water-soluble thermosensitive polymers having phosphonium groups from methacryloyloxyethyl trialkyl phosphonium chlorides–N-isopropylacrylamide copolymers and their functions. J Appl Polym Sci. 2003;87(3):386–93.CrossRef
121.
Palermo EF, Kuroda K. Chemical structure of cationic groups in amphiphilic polymethacrylates modulates the antimicrobial and hemolytic activities. Biomacromolecules. 2009;10(6):1416–28.CrossRef
122.
Al-Badri ZM, et al. Investigating the effect of increasing charge density on the hemolytic activity of synthetic antimicrobial polymers. Biomacromolecules. 2008;9(10):2805–10.CrossRef
123.
Chen Y, et al. Amphipathic antibacterial agents using cationic methacrylic polymers with natural rosin as pendant group. RSC Adv. 2012;2(27):10275–82.CrossRef
124.
Wang J, et al. Robust antimicrobial compounds and polymers derived from natural resin acids. Chem Commun. 2012;48(6):916–8.CrossRef
125.
Colak S, et al. Hydrophilic modifications of an amphiphilic polynorbornene and the effects on its hemolytic and antibacterial activity. Biomacromolecules. 2009;10(2):353–9.CrossRef
126.
Kanazawa A, Ikeda T, Endo T. Polymeric phosphonium salts as a novel class of cationic biocides. II. Effects of counter anion and molecular weight on antibacterial activity of polymeric phosphonium salts. J Polym Sci A Polym Chem. 1993;31(6):1441–7.CrossRef
127.
Bruenke J, et al. Quantitative comparison of the antimicrobial efficiency of leaching versus nonleaching polymer materials. Macromol Biosci. 2016;16(5):647–54.CrossRef
128.
Balouiri M, Sadiki M, Ibnsouda SK. Methods for in vitro evaluating antimicrobial activity: a review. J Pharm Anal. 2016;6(2):71–9.CrossRef
129.
CLSI. Performance standards for antimicrobial disk susceptibility tests. Approved Standard. 7th ed. CLSI document M02-A11. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2012.
130.
CLSI. Method for antifungal disk diffusion susceptibility testing of yeasts. Approved Guideline. CLSI document M44-A. Wayne, PA: CLSI; 2004.
131.
Magaldi S, et al. Well diffusion for antifungal susceptibility testing. Int J Infect Dis. 2004;8(1):39–45.CrossRef
132.
Valgas C, et al. Screening methods to determine antibacterial activity of natural products. Braz J Microbiol. 2007;38(2):369–80.CrossRef
133.
Jiménez-Esquilín A, Roane T. Antifungal activities of actinomycete strains associated with high-altitude sagebrush rhizosphere. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2005;32(8):378–81.CrossRef
134.
Elleuch L, et al. Bioactive secondary metabolites from a new terrestrial Streptomyces sp. TN262. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2010;162(2):579–93.CrossRef
135.
Lertcanawanichakul M, Sawangnop S. A comparison of two methods used for measuring the antagonistic activity of Bacillus species. Walailak J Sci Technol. 2011;5(2):161–71.
136.
Ali‐Shtayeh M, Abu Ghdeib SI. Antifungal activity of plant extracts against dermatophytes. Mycoses. 1999;42(11–12):665–72.CrossRef
137.
Mukherjee PK, Raghu K. Effect of temperature on antagonistic and biocontrol potential of shape Trichoderma sp. on Sclerotium rolfsii. Mycopathologia. 1997;139(3):151–5.CrossRef
138.
Kumar SN, et al. Isolation and identification of antimicrobial secondary metabolites from Bacillus cereus associated with a rhabditid entomopathogenic nematode. Ann Microbiol. 2014;64(1):209–18.CrossRef
139.
Dewanjee S, et al. Bioautography and its scope in the field of natural product chemistry. J Pharm Anal. 2015;5(2):75–84.CrossRef
140.
Marston A. Thin-layer chromatography with biological detection in phytochemistry. J Chromatogr A. 2011;1218(19):2676–83.CrossRef
141.
Choma IM, Grzelak EM. Bioautography detection in thin-layer chromatography. J Chromatogr A. 2011;1218(19):2684–91.CrossRef
142.
Grzelak EM, Majer-Dziedzic B, Choma IM. Development of a novel direct bioautography–thin-layer chromatography test: optimization of growth conditions for Gram-negative bacteria, Escherichia coli. J AOAC Int. 2011;94(5):1567–72.CrossRef
143.
Silva MT, et al. Studies on antimicrobial activity, in vitro, of Physalis angulata L. (Solanaceae) fraction and physalin B bringing out the importance of assay determination. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2005;100(7):779–82.CrossRef
144.
Runyoro DK, et al. Screening of Tanzanian medicinal plants for anti-Candida activity. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2006;6(1):1.CrossRef
145.
Pfaller M, Sheehan D, Rex J. Determination of fungicidal activities against yeasts and molds: lessons learned from bactericidal testing and the need for standardization. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2004;17(2):268–80.CrossRef
146.
CLSI. Methods for determining bactericidal activity of antimicrobial agents. Approved Guideline. CLSI document M26-A. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 1998.
147.
Konaté K, et al. Antibacterial activity against β-lactamase producing Methicillin and Ampicillin-resistants Staphylococcus aureus: Fractional Inhibitory Concentration Index (FICI) determination. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2012;11(1):1.CrossRef
148.
CLSI. Method for antifungal disk diffusion susceptibility testing of nondermatophyte filamentous fungi. Approved Guideline. CLSI document M51-A. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2010.
149.
CLSI. Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically. Approved Standard, 9th ed. CLSI document M07-A9. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2012.
150.
CLSI. Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts. Approved Standard, 2nd ed. NCCLS document M27-A2. Wayne, PA: CLSI; 2002.
151.
CLSI. Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing filamentous fungi. Approved Standard, 2nd ed. CLSI document M38-A2. Wayne, PA: CLSI; 2008.
152.
153.
ASTM E2180–07. Standard test method for determining the activity of incorporated antimicrobial agent(s) in polymeric or hydrophobic materials. 2012. www.​astm.​org
154.
Bechert T, Steinrucke P, Guggenbichler JP. A new method for screening anti-infective biomaterials. Nat Med. 2000;6(9):1053–6.CrossRef
155.
Yacoby I, Benhar I. Targeted anti bacterial therapy. Infect Disord Drug Targets. 2007;7(3):221–9.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Chemical Approaches to Prepare Antimicrobial Polymers
verfasst von
Juan Rodríguez-Hernández
Copyright-Jahr
2017
Buch
Polymers against Microorganisms

Print ISBN: 978-3-319-47960-6

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-47961-3

Copyright-Jahr: 2017

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47961-3_3

Premium Partner

    Marktübersichten

    Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen. 

    Zur Marktübersicht
    Bildnachweise