Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
MTZ-Fachkongress

Antriebe und Energiesysteme von morgen


Austausch von Automobil- und Energiewirtschaft

Am 14./15. Mai geht es in Chemnitz um die Mobilitätswende durch Elektro- und Wasserstofffahrzeuge.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Wireless Personal Communications
Erschienen in: Wireless Personal Communications 2/2024

28.03.2024

Cluster-Based Multi-attribute Routing Protocol for Underwater Acoustic Sensor Networks

verfasst von: Pradeep Nazareth, B. R. Chandavarkar

Erschienen in: Wireless Personal Communications | Ausgabe 2/2024

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Underwater Acoustic Sensor Networks play a significant role in various underwater applications. There are several challenges in underwater communications like high bit-error-rate, low bandwidth, high energy consumption, void-node during routing, etc. Handling void-node during routing is a major challenge in underwater routing. There are well-known void-handling protocols like Energy-efficient Void-Aware Geographic Routing protocol, HydroCast, etc. However, these routing protocols require all neighboring nodes must be a part of the cluster which increases the overhead on clustering, or void-node has a part of the routing. This paper proposes an underwater routing protocol referred to as Cluster-based Multi-Attribute Routing (CMAR) to overcome these issues. It is a sender-based, opportunistic underwater routing protocol. CMAR uses the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution to evaluate the suitability of the neighboring nodes and the basis for clustering process initialization. Through MATLAB simulations, the performance of the CMAR is compared with HydroCast in terms of the number of nodes selected in the forwarding set, number of clusters formed, number of times void-node becomes part of routing and transmission reliability.
Vorheriger Artikel Superimposed Pilot-based Channel Estimation for RIS-assisted IoT Systems Using Lightweight Network
Nächster Artikel Multi-objective Deep Reinforcement Learning Based Joint Beamforming and Power Allocation in UAV Assisted Cellular Communication

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Literatur
1.
Heidemann, J., Stojanovic, M., & Zorzi, M. (2012). Underwater sensor networks: Applications, advances and challenges. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 370(1958), 158–175.CrossRef
2.
Pompili, D., Melodia, T., & Akyildiz, I.F.(2006). Routing algorithms for delay-insensitive and delay-sensitive applications in underwater sensor networks. In: Proceedings of the 12th annual international conference on mobile computing and networking, (pp. 298–309)
3.
Coutinho, R. W., Boukerche, A., Vieira, L. F., & Loureiro, A. A. (2015). A novel void node recovery paradigm for long-term underwater sensor networks. Ad Hoc Networks, 34, 144–156.CrossRef
4.
Akyildiz, I. F., Pompili, D., & Melodia, T. (2004). Challenges for efficient communication in underwater acoustic sensor networks. ACM Sigbed Review, 1(2), 3–8.CrossRef
5.
Akyildiz, I. F., Pompili, D., & Melodia, T. (2005). Underwater acoustic sensor networks: Research challenges. Ad Hoc Networks, 3(3), 257–279.CrossRef
6.
Coutinho, R.W., Vieira, L.F., & Loureiro, A.A. (2013) Movement assisted-topology control and geographic routing protocol for underwater sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 16th ACM international conference on modeling, analysis & simulation of wireless and mobile systems, (pp. 189–196)
7.
Kheirabadi, M. T., & Mohamad, M. M. (2013). Greedy routing in underwater acoustic sensor networks: A survey. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, 9(7), 701834.CrossRef
8.
Ghoreyshi, S. M., Shahrabi, A., & Boutaleb, T. (2017). Void-handling techniques for routing protocols in underwater sensor networks: Survey and challenges. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 19(2), 800–827.CrossRef
9.
Alasarpanahi, H., Ayatollahitafti, V., & Gandomi, A. (2020). Energy-efficient void avoidance geographic routing protocol for underwater sensor networks. International Journal of Communication Systems, 33(6), 4218.CrossRef
10.
Xie, P., Zhou, Z., Peng, Z., Cui, J.-H., & Shi, Z. (2009) Void avoidance in three-dimensional mobile underwater sensor networks. In International conference on wireless algorithms, systems, and applications, (pp. 305–314) . Springer
11.
Boukerche, A., & Darehshoorzadeh, A. (2014). Opportunistic routing in wireless networks: Models, algorithms, and classifications. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 47(2), 1–36.CrossRef
12.
13.
Coutinho, R.W., Boukerche, A., Vieira, L.F., & Loureiro, A.A. (2015) Modeling and analysis of opportunistic routing in low duty-cycle underwater sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM international conference on modeling, analysis and simulation of wireless and mobile systems, (pp. 125–132)
14.
Noh, Y., Lee, U., Lee, S., Wang, P., Vieira, L. F., Cui, J.-H., Gerla, M., & Kim, K. (2015). Hydrocast: Pressure routing for underwater sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 65(1), 333–347.CrossRef
15.
Shahrabi, A., Ghoreyshi, S. M., & Boutaleb, T. (2016). A novel cooperative opportunistic routing scheme for underwater sensor networks. Sensors, 16(3), 297.CrossRef
16.
Zhu, Y., Tian, D., & Yan, F. (2020). Effectiveness of entropy weight method in decision-making. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2020, 1–5.
17.
Foubert, B., & Mitton, N. (2021). RODENT: a flexible TOPSIS based routing protocol for multi-technology devices in wireless sensor networks. ITU Journal on Future and Evolving Technologies, 2(1).
18.
Barbeau, M., Blouin, S., Cervera, G., Garcia-Alfaro, J., & Kranakis, E. (2015). Location-free link state routing for underwater acoustic sensor networks. In 2015 IEEE 28th Canadian conference on electrical and computer engineering (CCECE), (pp. 1544–1549) IEEE
19.
Nazareth, P., & Chandavarkar, B. (2022). Location-free void avoidance routing protocol for underwater acoustic sensor networks. Wireless Personal Communications, 123, 1–26.CrossRef
20.
Ghoreyshi, S.M., Shahrabi, A., & Boutaleb, T. (2015) An inherently void avoidance routing protocol for underwater sensor networks. In: 2015 International symposium on wireless communication systems (ISWCS)
21.
Basagni, S., Petrioli, C., Petroccia, R., & Spaccini, D. (2015). CARP: A channel-aware routing protocol for underwater acoustic wireless networks. Ad Hoc Networks, 34, 92–104.CrossRef
22.
Han, G., Liu, L., Bao, N., Jiang, J., Zhang, W., & Rodrigues, J. J. (2017). AREP: An asymmetric link-based reverse routing protocol for underwater acoustic sensor networks. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 92, 51–58.CrossRef
23.
Erol-Kantarci, M., Mouftah, H. T., & Oktug, S. (2011). A survey of architectures and localization techniques for underwater acoustic sensor networks. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 13(3), 487–502.CrossRef
24.
Xie, P., Cui, J.-H., & Lao, L. (2006). Vbf: Vector-based forwarding protocol for underwater sensor networks. In International conference on research in networking, (pp. 1216–1221) Springer
25.
Yu, H., Yao, N., & Liu, J. (2015). An adaptive routing protocol in underwater sparse acoustic sensor networks. Ad Hoc Networks, 34, 121–143.CrossRef
26.
27.
Noh, Y., Lee, U., Wang, P., Choi, B. S. C., & Gerla, M. (2012). VAPR: Void-aware pressure routing for underwater sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 12(5), 895–908.CrossRef
28.
29.
Javaid, N., Majid, A., Sher, A., Khan, W. Z., & Aalsalem, M. Y. (2018). Avoiding void holes and collisions with reliable and interference-aware routing in underwater WSNS. Sensors, 18(9), 3038.CrossRef
30.
31.
Zhang, Y., Zhang, Z., Chen, L., & Wang, X. (2021). Reinforcement learning-based opportunistic routing protocol for underwater acoustic sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 70(3), 2756–2770.CrossRef
32.
Behzadian, M., Otaghsara, S. K., Yazdani, M., & Ignatius, J. (2012). A state-of the-art survey of Topsis applications. Expert Systems with applications, 39(17), 13051–13069.CrossRef
33.
Chandavarkar, B. R., & Guddeti, R. M. R. (2016). Simplified and improved multiple attributes alternate ranking method for vertical handover decision in heterogeneous wireless networks. Computer Communications, 83, 81–97.CrossRef
34.
Vafaei, N., Ribeiro, R. A., & Camarinha-Matos, L. M. (2018). Data normalisation techniques in decision making: Case study with topsis method. International Journal of Information and Decision Sciences, 10(1), 19–38.CrossRef
35.
Chandavarkar, B. R., & Guddeti, R. M. R. (2015). Simplified and improved analytical hierarchy process aid for selecting candidate network in an overlay heterogeneous networks. Wireless Personal Communications, 83(4), 2593–2606.CrossRef
36.
Wang, L., & Kuo, G.-S.G. (2012). Mathematical modeling for network selection in heterogeneous wireless networks-a tutorial. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 15(1), 271–292.CrossRef
37.
Rani, S., Ahmed, S. H., Malhotra, J., & Talwar, R. (2017). Energy efficient chain based routing protocol for underwater wireless sensor networks. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 92, 42–50.CrossRef
38.
Thi Kim, O. T., Nguyen, V. D., & Hong, C. S. (2014). Which network simulation tool is better for simulating vehicular ad hoc network? Proceedings of the Korean Information Science Conference, 134(1), 930–932.
39.
Ghoreyshi, S. M., Shahrabi, A., & Boutaleb, T. (2016). A novel cooperative opportunistic routing scheme for underwater sensor networks. Sensors, 16(3), 297.CrossRef
40.
O’Rourke, M., Basha, E., Detweiler, C (2012) Multi-modal communications in underwater sensor networks using depth adjustment. In Proceedings of the 7th international conference on underwater networks & systems, (pp. 1–5)
41.
Nazareth, P., & Chandavarkar, B. R. (2019). E-var: Enhanced void avoidance routing algorithm for underwater acoustic sensor networks. IET Wireless Sensor Systems, 9(6), 389–398.CrossRef
42.
Thyagarajan, J., & Kulanthaivelu, S. (2021). A joint hybrid corona based opportunistic routing design with quasi mobile sink for IOT based wireless sensor network. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 12(1), 991–1009.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Cluster-Based Multi-attribute Routing Protocol for Underwater Acoustic Sensor Networks
verfasst von
Pradeep Nazareth
B. R. Chandavarkar
Publikationsdatum
28.03.2024
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Wireless Personal Communications / Ausgabe 2/2024
Print ISSN: 0929-6212
Elektronische ISSN: 1572-834X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-024-10926-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2024

Wireless Personal Communications 2/2024 Zur Ausgabe

OriginalPaper

IGO_CM: An Improved Grey-Wolf Optimization Based Classification Model for Cyber Crime Data Analysis Using Machine Learning

ReviewPaper

Blind and Semi-blind Channel Estimation and Collision Resolution for the Uplink of MU-MIMO and Massive MIMO Systems for B5G Networks

BriefCommunication

A New Approach for D2D Assisted Multicast and Unicast Communications

ReviewPaper

Wireless Sensor Networks in Healthcare System: A Systematic Review

OriginalPaper

Deep Learning-based Pilot Adaptation and Channel Estimation in OFDM Systems

ReviewPaper

A Systematic Review on Deep Learning Techniques for Diabetic Retinopathy Segmentation and Detection Using Ocular Imaging Modalities

Neuer Inhalt

    Bildnachweise