nach oben

Education and Information Technologies

Erschienen in:

10.08.2023

Factors affecting university students’ intention to use mobile apps for intercultural competence development: A mixed-method approach

verfasst von: Xiaotian Zhang, Mingming Zhou

Erschienen in: Education and Information Technologies | Ausgabe 6/2024

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Despite the rising awareness that mobile technologies can be used as viable options for additional support for intercultural learning, few studies have been conducted to explore the feasibility of using mobile apps to develop intercultural competence (IC) from the perspectives of learners’ acceptance and user experiences. This study applied a mixed-method approach to investigate factors affecting university students’ acceptance of using mobile apps to develop their IC. Quantitative survey data were collected from 671 Chinese university students using measures developed based on the extended technology acceptance model. The results of structural equation modeling indicated that students’ perceived usefulness (PU) of mobile apps supporting IC development positively influenced their mobile application efficacy, subjective norms, and perceived enjoyment. Additionally, their perceived ease of use (PEU) concerning the apps was positively associated with their mobile application efficacy, perceived enjoyment, and previous experiences, while being negatively associated with mobile application anxiety. PU and PEU were also found to be positively related to students’ attitudes towards and behavioral intention to use apps for intercultural learning. Qualitative interviews were subsequently conducted with six students to investigate the underlying reasons for the predictors identified quantitatively following their actual use of three recommended apps over three consecutive weeks. The results of content analysis uncovered a range of categories that provided further insights into the statistical findings. Implications of the findings were discussed in the context of technology-enhancing intercultural education.

Vorheriger Artikel Using multimodal learning analytics to model students’ learning behavior in animated programming classroom

Nächster Artikel What motivate learners to continue a professional development program through Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs)?: A lens of self-determination theory

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Abdullah, F., & Ward, R. (2016). Developing a General Extended Technology Acceptance Model for E-Learning (GETAMEL) by analysing commonly used external factors. Computers in Human Behavior, 56, 238–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.11.036CrossRef

Abdullah, F., Ward, R., & Ahmed, E. (2016). Investigating the influence of the most commonly used external variables of TAM on students’ Perceived Ease of Use (PEOU) and Perceived Usefulness (PU) of e-portfolios. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 75–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.014CrossRef

Aboelmaged, M., Ali, I., & Hashem, G. (2022). Mobile apps use for wellness and fitness and university students’ subjective wellbeing. Information Development, 38(4), 672–687. https://doi.org/10.1177/02666669211020498CrossRef

Açıkgül, K., & Şad, S. N. (2021). High school students’ acceptance and use of mobile technology in learning mathematics. Education and Information Technologies, 26(4), 4181–4201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10466-7CrossRef

Akdere, M., Acheson-Clair, K., & Jiang, Y. (2021). An examination of the effectiveness of virtual reality technology for intercultural competence development. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 82, 109–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2021.03.009CrossRef

Al Kurdi, B., Alshurideh, M., & Salloum, S. A. (2020). Investigating a theoretical framework for e-learning technology acceptance. International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE), 10(6), 6484–6496. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijece.v10i6.pp6484-6496CrossRef

Alalwan, A. A., Dwivedi, Y. K., Rana, N. P., Lal, B., & Williams, M. D. (2015). Consumer adoption of Internet banking in Jordan: Examining the role of hedonic motivation, habit, self-efficacy and trust. Journal of Financial Services Marketing, 20(2), 145–157. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-04-2015-0035CrossRef

Al-Maroof, R. S., Salloum, S. A., AlHamadand, A. Q. M., & Shaalan, K. (2020). Understanding an extension technology acceptance model of google translation: A multi-cultural study in United Arab Emirates. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 3, 157–178. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v14i03.11110CrossRef

Al-Maroof, R. S., Alhumaid, K., Akour, I., & Salloum, S. (2021). Factors that affect e-learning platforms after the spread of COVID-19: Post acceptance study. Data, 6(5), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/data6050049CrossRef

Alotumi, M. (2022). Factors influencing graduate students’ behavioral intention to use Google Classroom: Case study-mixed methods research. Education and Information Technologies, 27(7), 10035–10063. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11051-2CrossRef

Al-Qaysi, N., Mohamad-Nordin, N., & Al-Emran, M. (2020). Employing the technology acceptance model in social media: A systematic review. Education and Information Technologies, 25(6), 4961–5002. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10197-1CrossRef

Alrajawy, I., Isaac, O., Ghosh, A., Nusari, M., Al-Shibami, A. H., & Ameen, A. A. (2018). Determinants of student’s intention to use mobile learning in Yemeni public universities: Extending the technology acceptance model (TAM) with anxiety. International Journal of Management and Human Science (IJMHS), 2(2), 1–9.

Angelova, M., & Zhao, Y. (2016). Using an online collaborative project between American and Chinese students to develop ESL teaching skills, cross-cultural awareness and language skills. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(1), 167–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2014.907320CrossRef

Arean, P. A., Hallgren, K. A., Jordan, J. T., Gazzaley, A., Atkins, D. C., Heagerty, P. J., & Anguera, J. A. (2016). The use and effectiveness of mobile apps for depression: Results from a fully remote clinical trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 18(12), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.6482CrossRef

Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191CrossRef

Bandura, A. (1999). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2(1), 21–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-839X.00024MathSciNetCrossRef

Boseovski, J. J., Hughes, C., & Miller, S. E. (2016). Expertise in unexpected places: Children’s acceptance of information from gender counter-stereotypical experts. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 141, 161–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2015.09.002CrossRef

Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1(3), 185–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/135910457000100301CrossRef

Brzeziński, D. (2020). From revisionism to retrotopia: Stability and variability in Zygmunt Bauman’s theory of culture. European Journal of Social Theory, 23(4), 459–476. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431019860518CrossRef

Byram, M. (2020). Teaching and assessing intercultural communicative competence (2nd ed.). Multilingual Matters.CrossRef

Chang, C. T., Hajiyev, J., & Su, C. R. (2017). Examining the students’ behavioral intention to use e-learning in Azerbaijan? The general extended technology acceptance model for e-learning approach. Computers & Education, 111, 128–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.04.010CrossRef

Chaya, P., & Inpin, B. (2020). Effects of integrating movie-based mobile learning instruction for enhancing Thai university students’ speaking skills and intercultural communicative competence. English Language Teaching, 13(7), 27–45. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v13n7p27CrossRef

Cheng, S., & Cho, V. (2011). An integrated model of employees’ behavioral intention toward innovative information and communication technologies in travel agencies. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 35(4), 488–510. https://doi.org/10.1177/1096348010384598CrossRef

Chien, C. L. (2016). Beyond authoritarian personality: The culture-inclusive theory of Chinese authoritarian orientation. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00924CrossRef

Corriveau, K. H., & Winters, M. A. (2019). Trusting your teacher: Implications for policy. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 6(2), 123–129. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732219862574CrossRef

Crespo, Á. H., Salmones Sánchez, M. M. G. D. L., & Bosque, I. R. D. (2013). Influence of users’ perceived compatibility and their prior experience on B2C e-commerce acceptance. In T. Matsuo & R. Colomo-Palacios (Eds.), Electronic business and marketing (pp. 103–123). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37932-1_8CrossRef

Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage.

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008CrossRef

Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982–1003. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982CrossRef

Deardorff, D. (2017). The big picture of intercultural competence assessment. In D. Deardoff & L. ArasaratnamSmith (Eds.), Intercultural competence in higher education: International approaches, assessment, and application (pp. 124–133). Routledge.CrossRef

Durodolu, O. (2016). Technology Acceptance Model as a predictor of using information system to acquire information literacy skills. Library Philosophy & Practice. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/1450. Accessed 10 Mar 2023

Ferran, F. M. (2021). Extended technology acceptance model to examine the use of google forms–Based lesson playlist in online distance learning. Recoletos Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 9(1), 147–161. https://doi.org/10.32871/rmrj2109.01.13CrossRef

Finstad, K. (2010). Response interpolation and scale sensitivity: Evidence against 5-point scales. Journal of Usability Studies, 5(3), 104–110.

Fox, E. M. (2019). The adoption of mobile learning into higher education: Influencing students' skills, attitudes, and global competence [Unpublished doctoral dissertation], Purdue University.

Gao, S., & Kennedy, T. J. (2019). Intercultural competence development of Chinese students after a short-term study abroad experience. Sino-US English Teaching, 16(5), 177–196. https://doi.org/10.17265/1539-8072/2019.05.001CrossRef

George, D., & Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference. Allyn & Bacon.

Granić, A., & Marangunić, N. (2019). Technology acceptance model in educational context: A systematic literature review. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(5), 2572–2593. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12864CrossRef

Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139–152. https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202CrossRef

Hang, Y., & Zhang, X. (2023). Intercultural competence developmental processes of university and college students as three types of transition–A systematic review. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 92, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2022.101748CrossRef

Hanson, W. E., Creswell, J. W., Plano Clark, V. L., Petska, K. S., & Creswell, J. D. (2005). Mixed methods research designs in counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52, 224–235. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.224CrossRef

Heinzmann, S., Künzle, R., Schallhart, N., & Müller, M. (2015). The effect of study abroad on intercultural competence: Results from a longitudinal quasi-experimental study. Frontiers: The Interdisciplinary Journal of Study Abroad, 26, 187–208.CrossRef

Holsapple, C. W., & Wu, J. (2007). User acceptance of virtual worlds: The hedonic framework. ACM SIGMIS Database: The DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems, 38(4), 86–89. https://doi.org/10.1145/1314234.1314250CrossRef

Hsu, H. T., & Lin, C. C. (2022). Extending the technology acceptance model of college learners’ mobile-assisted language learning by incorporating psychological constructs. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(2), 286–306. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13165CrossRef

Huang, F., Teo, T., & Scherer, R. (2022). Investigating the antecedents of university students’ perceived ease of using the Internet for learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(6), 1060–1076. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1710540CrossRef

Humida, T., Al Mamun, M. H., & Keikhosrokiani, P. (2022). Predicting behavioral intention to use e-learning system: A case-study in Begum Rokeya University, Rangpur, Bangladesh. Education and Information Technologies, 27(2), 2241–2265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10707-9CrossRef

Iskandar, Y. H. P., & Sia, P. Y. H. (2020). Mobile travel apps and generation y in malaysia: An empirical evidence to understanding the factors influencing the intention to use. In F. Liébana, Z. Kalini, I. R. de Luna, & I. Rodríguez-Ardura (Eds.), Impact of mobile services on business development and e-commerce (pp. 186–210). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-0050-7.ch010CrossRef

Jiang, H., Turnbull, D., Wang, X., Chugh, R., Dou, Y., & Chen, S. (2022). How do mathematics interest and self-efficacy influence coding interest and self-efficacy? A structural equation modeling analysis. International Journal of Educational Research, 115, 102058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2022.102058CrossRef

Jiang, H., Chugh, R., Turnbull, D., Wang, X., & Chen, S. (2023). Modeling the impact of intrinsic coding interest on STEM career interest: Evidence from senior high school students in two large Chinese cities. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 2639–2659. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11277-0CrossRef

Kimathi, F. A., & Zhang, Y. (2019). Exploring the general extended technology acceptance model for e-learning approach on student’s usage intention on e-learning system in University of Dar es Salaam. Creative Education, 10(1), 208–223. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2019.101017CrossRef

Kreuzbauer, R., & Keller, J. (2017). The authenticity of cultural products: A psychological perspective. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26(5), 417–421. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417702104CrossRef

Kuckartz, U. (2014). Qualitative text analysis: A guide to methods, practice & using software. Sage.CrossRef

Kukulska-Hulme, A., & Lee, H. (2019). Mobile collaboration for language learning and cultural learning. In M. Dressman & R. W. Sadler (Eds.), The handbook of informal language learning (pp. 169–180). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119472384.ch11CrossRef

Kummer, T. F., Recker, J., & Bick, M. (2017). Technology-induced anxiety: Manifestations, cultural influences, and its effect on the adoption of sensor-based technology in German and Australian hospitals. Information & Management, 54(1), 73–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2016.04.002CrossRef

Lai, Y., Saab, N., & Admiraal, W. (2022). Learning strategies in self-directed language learning using mobile technology in higher education: A systematic scoping review. Education and Information Technologies, 27, 7749–7780. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10945-5CrossRef

Li, Q., Liu, Q., & Chen, Y. (2023). Prospective teachers’ acceptance of virtual reality technology: A mixed study in rural China. Education and Information Technologies, 28(3), 3217–3248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11219-wCrossRef

Liang, Y., & Schartner, A. (2022). Culturally mixed group work and the development of students’ intercultural competence. Journal of Studies in International Education, 26(1), 44–60. https://sslvpn.um.edu.mo/10.1177/,DanaInfo=.adpkCswm,SSL+1028315320963507

Linardatos, G., & Apostolou, D. (2023). Investigating high school students’ perception about digital comics creation in the classroom. Education and Information Technologies, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11581-3

Mailizar, M., Burg, D., & Maulina, S. (2021). Examining university students’ behavioural intention to use e-learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: An extended TAM model. Education and Information Technologies, 26(6), 7057–7077. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10557-5CrossRef

McDonald, R. P., & Ho, M. H. R. (2002). Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. Psychological Methods, 7(1), 64–82. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.7.1.64CrossRef

Merino-Campos, C., del-Castillo, H., & Medina-Merodio, J. A. (2022). Factors affecting the acceptance of video games as a tool to improve students’ academic performance in physical education. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 5717–5737. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11295-yCrossRef

Mingsiritham, K., & Chanyawudhiwan, G. (2020). Experiment of the prototype of online learning resources on massive open online course (mooc) to develop life skills in using technology media for hearing impaired students. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 15(3), 242–249. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i03.12059CrossRef

Minton, E. A., Spielmann, N., Kahle, L. R., & Kim, C. H. (2018). The subjective norms of sustainable consumption: A cross-cultural exploration. Journal of Business Research, 82, 400–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.12.031CrossRef

Mobasher, B., Dai, H., Luo, T., & Nakagawa, M. (2002). Discovery and evaluation of aggregate usage profiles for web personalization. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 6(1), 61–82.MathSciNetCrossRef

Ngai, E. W., Poon, J. K. L., & Chan, Y. H. (2007). Empirical examination of the adoption of WebCT using TAM. Computers & Education, 48(2), 250–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2004.11.007CrossRef

Norng, S. (2022). Factors influencing mobile banking adoption in Cambodia: The structuring of TAM, DIT, and trust with TPB. Asian Journal of Business Research, 12(3), 21–42. https://doi.org/10.14707/ajbr.220133CrossRef

Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory. McGraw-Hill.

Özdemir, E. (2017). Promoting EFL learners’ intercultural communication effectiveness: A focus on Facebook. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(6), 510–528. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1325907CrossRef

Pandey, A., Hasan, S., Dubey, D., & Sarangi, S. (2013). Smartphone apps as a source of cancer information: Changing trends in health information-seeking behavior. Journal of Cancer Education, 28(1), 138–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-012-0446-9CrossRef

Pedersen, P. E. (2005). Adoption of mobile Internet services: An exploratory study of mobile commerce early adopters. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 15(3), 203–222. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327744joce1503_2CrossRef

Peng, W., Kanthawala, S., Yuan, S., & Hussain, S. A. (2016). A qualitative study of user perceptions of mobile health apps. BMC Public Health, 16(1), 1158–1169. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3808-0CrossRef

Pratama, A. R., & Scarlatos, L. L. (2020). The roles of device ownership and infrastructure in promoting E-learning and M-learning in Indonesia. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning (IJMBL), 12(4), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJMBL.2020100101CrossRef

Rahmi, B. A. K. I., Birgoren, B., & Aktepe, A. (2018). A meta analysis of factors affecting perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use in the adoption of e-learning systems. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 19(4), 4–42. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.471649CrossRef

Rahmiati, F., & Jelitalia, A. (2021). Extending the role of technology acceptance model (TAM) with perceived risk and e-customer service. Journal of Technology Management and Technopreneurship (JTMT), 9(1), 1–12.

Rana, N. P., Dwivedi, Y. K., Lal, B., Williams, M. D., & Clement, M. (2017). Citizens’ adoption of an electronic government system: Towards a unified view. Information Systems Frontiers, 19(3), 549–568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-015-9613-yCrossRef

Rawal, R., & Deardorff, D. K. (2021). Intercultural competences for all. In P. Nixon, V. Dennen, & R. Rawal (Eds.), Reshaping international teaching and learning in higher education: Universities in the information age. Routledge.

Rice, R., & Lauren, B. (2014). Developing intercultural competence through glocal activity theory using the connect-exchange study abroad app. In G. Verhulsdonck & L. Maruhong (Eds.), Digital rhetoric and global literacies: Communication modes and digital practices in the networked world (pp. 154–173). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-4916-3.ch008CrossRef

Sayaf, A. M., Alamri, M. M., Alqahtani, M. A., & Alrahmi, W. M. (2022). Factors influencing university students’ adoption of digital learning technology in teaching and learning. Sustainability, 14(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010493CrossRef

Schomakers, E. M., Lidynia, C., & Ziefle, M. (2022). The role of privacy in the acceptance of smart technologies: Applying the privacy calculus to technology acceptance. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 38(13), 1276–1289. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2021.1994211CrossRef

Shadiev, R., & Yu, J. (2022). Review of research on computer-assisted language learning with a focus on intercultural education. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2022.2056616

Shang, S. S., & Chiu, L. (2022). Leveraging smart technology for user experience personalization–A comparative case study of innovative payment systems. Pacific Asia Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 14(1), 105–125. https://doi.org/10.17705/1pais.14106CrossRef

Sibert, S. M., Laverick, D., & Machado, C. (2020). The influence of a graduate educational change and technology course on TPACK skills: A descriptive look at then and now. Education, 140(3), 139–153.

Southworth, S. S. (2019). US consumers’ perception of Asian brands’ cultural authenticity and its impact on perceived quality, trust, and patronage intention. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 31(4), 287–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/08961530.2018.1544528CrossRef

Suen, E., & Suen, B. A. (2019). Intercultural communication: A Canadian perspective. Canadian Scholars Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4000/communication.16234CrossRef

Taherdoost, H. (2017). Determining sample size: How to calculate survey sample size. International Journal of Economics and Management Systems, 2, 1–4.

Tourangeau, R., & Rasinski, K. A. (1988). Cognitive processes underlying context effects in attitude measurement. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 299–314. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.299CrossRef

Tran, H. T. T., Nguyen, N. T., & Tang, T. T. (2023). Influences of subjective norms on teachers’ intention to use social media in working. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/12659CrossRef

Tsai, T. H., Lin, W. Y., Chang, Y. S., Chang, P. C., & Lee, M. Y. (2020). Technology anxiety and resistance to change behavioral study of a wearable cardiac warming system using an extended TAM for older adults. PLoS ONE, 15(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227270CrossRef

Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sciences, 39(2), 273–315. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.xCrossRef

Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. (1996). A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: Development and test. Decision Sciences, 27(3), 451–481. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1996.tb00860.xCrossRef

Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926CrossRef

Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540CrossRef

Wang, Y., Yu, L., & Yu, Z. (2022). An extended CCtalk technology acceptance model in EFL education. Education and Information Technologies, 27(5), 6621–6640. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10909-9CrossRef

Warner, J. A., Koufteros, X., & Verghese, A. (2014). Learning computerese: The role of second language learning aptitude in technology acceptance. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 74(6), 991–1017. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164414520629CrossRef

Webb, L., Clough, J., O’Reilly, D., Wilmott, D., & Witham, G. (2017). The utility and impact of information communication technology (ICT) for pre-registration nurse education: A narrative synthesis systematic review. Nurse Education Today, 48, 160–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2016.10.007CrossRef

Williams, M., & Williams, J. (2010). Evaluating a model of business school students’ acceptance of web-based course management systems. The International Journal of Management Education, 8(3), 59–70. https://doi.org/10.3794/ijme.83.264CrossRef

Won, D., Chiu, W., & Byun, H. (2023). Factors influencing consumer use of a sport-branded App: The technology acceptance model integrating App quality and perceived enjoyment. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 35(5), 1112–1133. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJML-09-2021-0709CrossRef

Wu, P. F. (2012). A mixed methods approach to technology acceptance research. Journal of the AIS, 13, 172–187.

Zainab, B., Awais Bhatti, M., & Alshagawi, M. (2017). Factors affecting e-training adoption: An examination of perceived cost, computer self-efficacy and the technology acceptance model. Behaviour & Information Technology, 36(12), 1261–1273. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2017.1380703CrossRef

Zan, B., Çolaklar, H., Altay, A., & Taşkın, N. (2021). A study on digital literacy skills of faculty of letters students: Use of university library. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 16(1), 152–171. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v16i01.16567CrossRef

Zhang, X., & Zhou, M. (2022). Information and digital technology-assisted interventions to improve intercultural competence: A meta-analytical review. Computers & Education, 194, 104697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104697

Zhao, Y., Llorente, A. M. P., & Gómez, M. C. S. (2021). Digital competence in higher education research: A systematic literature review. Computers & Education, 168, 104212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104212CrossRef

Zuo, M., Hu, Y., Luo, H., Ouyang, H., & Zhang, Y. (2022). K-12 students’ online learning motivation in China: An integrated model based on community of inquiry and technology acceptance theory. Education and Information Technologies, 27(4), 4599–4620. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10791-xCrossRef

Titel: Factors affecting university students’ intention to use mobile apps for intercultural competence development: A mixed-method approach
verfasst von: Xiaotian Zhang
Mingming Zhou
Publikationsdatum: 10.08.2023
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Education and Information Technologies / Ausgabe 6/2024
Print ISSN: 1360-2357
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7608
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12106-8

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2024

Clustering-based knowledge graphs and entity-relation representation improves the detection of at risk students

Examining the effects of different forms of teacher feedback intervention for learners' cognitive and emotional interaction in online collaborative discussion: A visualization method for process mining based on text automatic analysis

Computational thinking and repetition patterns in early childhood education: Longitudinal analysis of representation and justification

Effects of Motivation on Chinese EFL Students to Read English Text on Social Media

Efficacy of augmented reality-based flashcards on learning Basic Tamil words among primary learners during neo - normal period

Optimizing learning return on investment: Identifying learning strategies based on user behavior characteristic in language learning applications

Premium Partner