nach oben

Education and Information Technologies

Erschienen in:

05.08.2023

Examining the effects of different forms of teacher feedback intervention for learners' cognitive and emotional interaction in online collaborative discussion: A visualization method for process mining based on text automatic analysis

verfasst von: Wei Xu, Le-Ying Yang, Xiao Liu, Pin-Nv Jin

Erschienen in: Education and Information Technologies | Ausgabe 6/2024

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Teacher feedback is the key to online collaborative discussion. To investigate the effects of different forms of teacher feedback intervention on learners' cognitive and emotional interactions in online collaborative discussion, this study collected collaborative discussion text data of online collaborative learners. Based on the framework of Community of Inquiry theory, naive Bayes algorithm for automatic coding of collaborative discussion text data was adopted. A bivariate (with or without emotion/guidance) experiment was designed based on teacher feedback. The participants of this study were college students (N = 109, average age = 20) of normal major participating in Teaching System Design. They were randomly divided into four experimental groups. In each experimental group, 4–5 people work in a group for collaborative learning. This study adopts quasi experimental research method, and the experiment period is 10 class hours. Reliability analysis, automatic text coding and ANOVA of cognitive-affective variables were used to conduct process mining for the collaborative discussion of four groups of learners by using heuristic mining algorithms. It found that different forms of teacher feedback have different effects on learners' cognitive emotion. Teachers' emotional feedback promotes learners' emotional interaction and cognitive interaction, which is easier to promote learners' cognitive interaction. Different forms of teacher feedback promote four types of cognitive emotion interaction process. This suggests that the multi-branch type of voice prompt feedback group has the best effect on learners' cognitive and emotional impact.

Vorheriger Artikel Unleashing imagination: an effective pedagogical approach to integrate into spherical video-based virtual reality to improve students’ creative writing

Nächster Artikel When the push and pull factors in digital educational resources backfire: the role of digital leader in digital educational resources usage

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Anderson, T., Rourke, L., Garrison, R. & Archer W. (2019). Assessing teaching presence in a computer conferencing context. Online Learning (Newburyport, Mass.), 5(2). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v5i2.1875

Arbaugh, J. B. (2001). How instructor immediacy behaviors affect student satisfaction and learning in web-based courses. Business Communication Quarterly, 64(4), 42–54.CrossRef

Arbaugh, J. B., & Hwang, A. (2006). Does “teaching presence” exist in online MBA courses? The Internet and Higher Education, 9, 9–21.CrossRef

Ariouat, H., Cairns, A.H.& Barkaoui, K. (2016). A two-step clustering approach for improving educational process model discovery. Paper presented at the 38–43. https://doi.org/10.1109/WETICE.2016.18

Ayutaya, NS., Palungsuntikul, P. & Premchaiswadi, W. (2012). Heuristic mining: adaptive process simplification in education. Paper presented at the 221–227. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTKE.2012.6408559

Bai, X. M., Ma, H. L. & Wu, H. M. (2016). A study on the relationship between instructional existence, social existence and cognitive existence -- A case study of mixed courses based on Moocs. Open Education Research, 22(04), 71–78. https://doi.org/10.13966/j.cnki.kfjyyj.2016.04.009

Bai, X. M., Ma, H. L. & Zhao, M. (2020). To explore the influence mechanism of social existence on cognitive existence in community. Modern Distance Education Research, 32(06), 87–93. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1009-5195.2020.06.011

Baker, J. D. (2004). An investigation of relationships among instructor immediacy and affective and cognitive learning in the online classroom. The Internet and Higher Education, 7, 1–13.CrossRef

Bardach, L., Klassen, R. M., Durksen, T. L., Rushby, J. V., Bostwick, K. C. P. & Sheridan, L. (2021). The power of feedback and reflection: Testing an online scenario-based learning intervention for student teachers. Computers and Education, 169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104194

Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J.(2000). Evolutionary psychology and the emotions. Handbook of Emotions.

Dong, Y., Luo, Z. L., Yang, Y. Y. & Wang, Y. (2021). Research on teacher feedback Literacy from the perspective of Education informationization 2.0 era. Research on Visual Education, 42(340(08)), 35–42+58. https://doi.org/10.13811/j.cnki.eer.2021.08.005

Dong, Y. (2020). An outline of student feedback Literacy: Connotation, model and development. Open Education Research, 26(147(05)), 26–39. https://doi.org/10.13966/j.cnki.kfjyyj.2020.05.003

Gao, H., Zeng X. & Yao C. (2019). Application of improved distributed naive bayesian algorithms in text classification. The Journal of Supercomputing, (9), 5831–5847. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-019-02862-1

Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (1999). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2–3), 87–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6CrossRef

Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923640109527071CrossRef

Gorham, J. (1988). The relationship between verbal teacher immediacy behaviors and student learning. Communication Education, 37, 40–53.CrossRef

Gratch, J., & Marsella, S. (2004). A domain-independent framework for modeling emotion. Cognitive Systems Research, 5(4), 269–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2004.02.002CrossRef

Hadwin, A. F. , Jrvel, S. , & Miller, M. . (2011). Self-regulated, co-regulated, and socially share regulation of learning.

He, B. X., Zhang, L. G. & Zhuang, K. J. (2021). The influence of gamification evaluation on online learning burnout and academic performance of college students. Research on Visual Education, 42(03), 62–68+119. https://doi.org/10.13811/j.cnki.eer.2021.03.009

He, H. Y., Liu, Q. T., Zhang, S., Guan, X. M., & Qin, W. H. (2022). Research on Automatic Analysis of Knowledge Construction Behavior of online collaborative Discussion. Modern Educational Technology, 32(05), 93–101. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1009-8097.2022.05.011CrossRef

Hu, D. R. (2013). Learning theory perspective and comprehensive classification of classroom feedback. Shanghai Education and Research Institute, (3), 57–60. https://doi.org/10.16194/j.cnki.31-1059/g4.2013.03.008

Huo, L. Y., & Zhao, Q. M. (2005). What happened to portfolio evaluation – Some problems in current portfolio evaluation. Educational Science Research, 06, 17–19.

Hyland, F. (1998). The impact of teacher written feedback on individual writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 7, 225–288.CrossRef

Kapur, M. (2011). Temporality matters: Advancing a method for analyzing problem-solving processes in a computer-supported collaborative environment. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6(1), 39–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-011-9109-9CrossRef

Lämsä, J., Uribe, M. P. & Jiménez, A. (2021). Deep networks for collaboration analytics: Promoting automatic analysis of face-to-face interaction in the context of inquiry-based learning. Journal of Learning Analytics, (8), 113–125. https://doi.org/10.18608/JLA.2021.7118

Lan, G. S. (2018). Exploring community theory models: research paradigms for online and blended learning. Open Education Research, 24(01), 29–40. https://doi.org/10.13966/j.cnki.kfjyyj.2018.01.004

Li, J., Tang, Y., & Cao, M. (2018). The moderating effects of discipline on the relationship between asynchronous discussion and satisfaction with MOOCs. Journal of Computers in Education, 3, 279–296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-018-0112-2CrossRef

Li,X.F., Wang, Q. & Zhang, L. G. (2012). Research on the Influencing Factors of Social presence in virtual learning Community. Open Education Research, 18(06), 87–94. https://doi.org/10.13966/j.cnki.kfjyyj.2012.06.012

Limperos, A. M., Buckner, M. M., Kaufmann, R., & Frisby, B. N. (2015). Online teaching and technological affordances: An experimental investigation into the impact of modality and clarity on perceived and actual learning. Computers & Education, 83, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.12.015CrossRef

Lin, Z. J. & Zhou, S. (2011). A study on the types and characteristics of teacher feedback in Middle School English classroom. Theory and Practice of Foreign Language Teaching, (03), 15–22+34.

Liu, S. N. Y., Peng, X. & Liu, Z. (2016). Study on the Application of learning Analysis based on Text Mining. e-Education Research, (2), 23–30. https://doi.org/10.13811/j.cnki.eer.2016.02.004

Liu, T. T., Liu, Z., Xu, H. H., Wang, J., Chai, Y. J. & Lu, J. (2020). Research on Virtual human emotion Model based on emotion cognitive evaluation theory. Psychological Science, 43(01), 53–59. https://doi.org/10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20200108

Lu, L. T., Liang, W., & Shen, X. (2012). Reflection on the current situation of classroom teaching evaluation in China and ways to improve it. Chinese Journal of Education, 06, 43–47.

Malmberg, J., Jarvela, S., & Kirschner, P. A. (2014). Elementary school students’ strategic learning: Does task-type matter? Metacognition and Learning, 9(2), 113–136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-013-9108-5CrossRef

Ma, N., Zhang, Y. L., Du, L., & Wang, Q. (2022). An automatic analysis model of Emotion-cognition for online asynchronous interactive text: A case study of large-scale online teacher training. Modern Educational Technology, 32(05), 83–92.

Sobocinski, M., Malmberg, J., & Järvelä, S. (2017). Exploring temporal sequences of regulatory phases and associated interactions in low- and high-challenge collaborative learning sessions. Metacognition and Learning, 12(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-016-9167-5CrossRef

McKlin, T. (2004). Analyzing cognitive presence in online courses using an ANN (pp. 40–80). Georgia State University.

Mohammed, Saqr. & Jalal, Nouri. (2020). High resolution temporal network analysis to understand and improve collaborative learning. Learning Analytics & Knowledge, 314–319. https://doi.org/10.1145/3375462.3375501

Molenaar, I., & Chiu, M. M. (2014). Dissecting sequences of regulation and cognition: Statistical discourse analysis of primary school children’s collaborative learning. Metacognition and Learning, 9(2), 137–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-013-9105-8CrossRef

Molenaar, I., & Järvelä, S. (2014). Sequential and temporal characteristics of self and socially regulated learning. Metacognition and Learning, 9(2), 75–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-014-9114-2CrossRef

Mory, E. H. (1992). The use of informational feedback in instruction: Implications for future research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 40(3), 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02296839CrossRef

Neto, V., Rolim, V., & Pinheiro, A. (2021). Automatic content analysis of online discussions for cognitive presence: A study of the generalizability across educational contexts. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 3, 299–312. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2021.3083178CrossRef

Padgett, C., Moffitt, R. L.& Grieve, R. (2020). More than words: Using digital cues to enhance student perceptions of online assignment feedback. The Internet and Higher Education, 49, 100789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2020.100789

Pechenizkiy, M. , Trcka, N. , Vasilyeva, E. , Aalst, W. M. P. V. D. , & Bra, P. D. . (2009). Process Mining Online Assessment Data. International Conference on Educational Data Mining-edm, Cordoba, Spain, July. DBLP.

Reeve, J., Jang, H., Carrell, D., Jeon, S., & Barch, J. (2004). Enhancing students’ engagement by increasing teachers’ autonomy support. Motivation and Emotion, 28(2), 147–169. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:MOEM.0000032312.95499.6fCrossRef

Richard, S. L. (2006). Emotions and Interpersonal Relationships: Toward a Person-Centered Conceptualization of Emotions and Coping. Journal of Personality., 74(1), 9–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00368.xCrossRef

Richardson, J.C.& Swan, K. (2003). Examining social presence in online courses in relation to students’ perceived learning and satisfaction. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(1). http://www.aln.org/publications/jaln/v7n1/index.asp

Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (1999). Assessing social presence in asynchronous text-based computer conferencing. The Journal of Distance Education, 14(2), 50–71.

Shea, P. & Bidjerano, T. (2010). Learning presence: Towards a theory of self-efficacy, self-regulation, and the development of a communities of inquiry in online and blended learning environments. Computers in Education, 59(2), 316–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.07.017

Song, Y., Ding, Y., Zhu, J.& Xu, C.L. (2021). Research on Interactive Classroom Teaching of multi-class teacher groups based on Sequential pattern Mining. Modern Educational Technology, 31(246(10)), 40–48.

Sonnenberg, C., & Bannert, M. (2015). Discovering the effects of metacognitive prompts on the sequential structure of SRL-processes using process mining techniques. Journal of Learning Analytics, 2(1), 72–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7916(82)90059-3CrossRef

Southavilay, V. , Yacef, K. , & Calvo, R. A. . (2010). Process Mining to Support Students' Collaborative Writing. Educational Data Mining 2010, The 3rd International Conference on Educational Data Mining, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, June 11-13, 2010.Proceedings. DBLP.

Swan, K. P., Richardson, J. C., Ice, P., Garrison, D. R., & Arbaugh, J. B. (2008). Validating a measurement tool of presence in online communities of inquiry. IEEE, 2(24), 1–11.

Wang, D., Ge, J., Hu, H., Luo, B., & Huang, L. (2012). Discovering process models from event multiset. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(15), 11970–11978. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.03.064CrossRef

Wang, X., Gao, Z.H., Xu, W.W.& Zhang, L. (2021). Research on the influence mechanism of feedback emotional design on video learning. e-Education Research, 42(03), 69–74. https://doi.org/10.13811/j.cnki.eer.2021.03.010

Wang, X., Han, M. Q., Gao, Z. H., & Wang, Z. J. (2020). The mechanism and optimization strategy of visual and auditory emotion design in teaching videos. Journal of Distance Education, 38(6), 50–61.

Wang, X. W., Xu, X. D., Liu, H. H. & Zhang, Y. H. (2019). Construction of comprehensive quality evaluation index system of primary and middle school students under information environment. Research on Visual Education, 40(309(01)), 67–76. https://doi.org/10.13811/j.cnki.eer.2019.01.009

Wang, Z. &Yue, Z. Y. (2018). An empirical study on the influence of teacher feedback on improving college students' IELTS writing ability. Examination and Assessment (College English Teaching and Research Edition), 95(04), 113–117. https://doi.org/10.16830/j.cnki.22-1

Winstone, N. E., Nash, R. A., Parker, M., & Rowntree, J. (2017). Supporting learners’ agentic engagement with feedback: A systematic review and a taxonomy of recipience processes. Educational Psychologist, 52(1), 17–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2016.1207538CrossRef

Xu, B., Chen, N. & Chen, G. (2020). Effects of teacher role on student engagement in WeChat-based online discussion learning. Computers and Education, 157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103956

Xu, W. & Shen, Z.Y. (2022). Exploring blended collaborative learning process based on heuristic mining algorithm. Research on Visual Education, 43(04), 99–106. https://doi.org/10.13811/j.cnki.eer.2022.04.014

Xu, Y. T. & Carless, D. (2017).'Only true friends could be cruelly honest.':cognitive scaffolding and social-affective support in teacher feedback literacy. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(7), 1082–1094. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2016.1226759

Yang, K. (2008). Classroom feedback behavior modification and student learning emotion. Science and Education Literature (mid-magazine), 71(08), 42.

Yang, M., Badger, R., & Yu, Z. (2006). A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback in a chinese EFL writing class. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15(3), 179–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2006.09.004

Zeng, N., Zhang, B. H. & Wang, Q. L. (2018). A comparative analysis of STEM education research at home and abroad in the past decade -- based on content analysis. Modern Distance Education, (05), 27–38. https://doi.org/10.13927/j.cnki.yuan.2018.0049

Zhang X., Jiang J., Hong R. & Du Y. (2015). Accelerated image classification algorithm based on naive bayes K-nearest neighbor. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 41(2), 302–310. https://doi.org/10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2014.0471

Titel: Examining the effects of different forms of teacher feedback intervention for learners' cognitive and emotional interaction in online collaborative discussion: A visualization method for process mining based on text automatic analysis
verfasst von: Wei Xu
Le-Ying Yang
Xiao Liu
Pin-Nv Jin
Publikationsdatum: 05.08.2023
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Education and Information Technologies / Ausgabe 6/2024
Print ISSN: 1360-2357
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7608
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12097-6

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2024

Shared digital artifacts – Co-creators as beneficiaries in microlearning development

Application of surgical video combined with a multidisciplinary treatment integrated teaching method in the clinical teaching of thyroid surgery

Impacts of online collaborative learning on students’ intercultural communication apprehension and intercultural communicative competence

Factors affecting university students’ intention to use mobile apps for intercultural competence development: A mixed-method approach

NaMemo2: Facilitating Teacher-Student Interaction with Theory-Based Design and Student Autonomy Consideration

An experimental study to promote preservice teachers’ competencies in the classroom based on teaching-learning model and Moso Teach

Premium Partner