nach oben

Education and Information Technologies

Erschienen in:

12.08.2023

NaMemo2: Facilitating Teacher-Student Interaction with Theory-Based Design and Student Autonomy Consideration

verfasst von: Guang Jiang, Jiahui Zhu, Yunsong Li, Pengcheng An, Yunlong Wang

Erschienen in: Education and Information Technologies | Ausgabe 6/2024

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Teacher-student interaction (TSI) is essential for learning efficiency and harmonious teacher-student interpersonal relationships. However, studies on TSI support tools often focus on teacher needs while neglecting student needs and autonomy. To enhance both lecturer competence in delivering interpersonal interaction and student autonomy in TSI, we developed NaMemo2, a novel augmented-reality system that allows students to express their willingness to TSI and displays student information to teachers during lectures. The design and evaluation process follows a new framework, STUDIER, which can facilitate the development of theory-based ethnics-aware TSI support tools in general. The quantitative results of our four-week field study with four classes in a university suggested that NaMemo2 can improve (1) TSI in the classroom from both teacher and student perspectives, (2) student attitudes and willingness to TSI, and (3) student attitudes to the deployment of NaMemo2. The qualitative feedback from students and teachers indicated that improving TSI may be responsible for improved attention in students and a better classroom atmosphere during lectures.

Vorheriger Artikel Influences of design and knowledge type of interactive virtual museums on learning outcomes: An eye-tracking evidence-based study

Nächster Artikel Exploring the artificial intelligence anxiety and machine learning attitudes of teacher candidates

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Ahuja, K., Kim, D., Xhakaj, F., Varga, V., Xie, A., Zhang, S., & Agarwal, Y. (2019). EduSense: Practical Classroom Sensing at Scale. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, 3(3), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1145/3351229.

Alavi, H. S., & Dillenbourg, P. (2012). An ambient awareness tool for supporting supervised collaborative problem solving. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 5(3), 264–274. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2012.7.CrossRef

Alavi, H. S., Dillenbourg, P., & Kaplan, F. (2009). Distributed awareness for class orchestration. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 5794 LNCS, 211–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04636-0_21.

An, P., Bakker, S., Ordanovski, S., Taconis, R., & Eggen, B. (2018). ClassBeacons: Designing distributed visualization of teachers’ physical proximity in the classroom. Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on Tangible Embedded and Embodied Interaction - TEI ’18, 357–367. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173225.3173243.

An, P., Bakker, S., Ordanovski, S., Taconis, R., Paffen, C. L. E., & Eggen, B. (2019). Unobtrusively enhancing reflection-in-action of teachers through spatially distributed ambient information. CHI 2019, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300321.

An, P., Holstein, K., D’Anjou, B., Eggen, B., & Bakker, S. (2020). The TA Framework: Designing Real-time Teaching Augmentation for K-12 Classrooms. CHI 2020, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376277.

Andrejevic, M., & Selwyn, N. (2020). Facial recognition technology in schools: Critical questions and concerns. Learning Media and Technology, 45(2), 115–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2020.1686014.CrossRef

Beyer, H., & Holtzblatt, K. (1998). Contextual design: Defining customer-centered systems. Morgan Kaufmann.

Brophy, J. (1999). Toward a model of the value aspects of motivation in education: Developing appreciation for particular learning domains and activities. Educational Psychologist, 34(2), 75–85. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3402_1.CrossRef

Brown, M., & Lowe, D. G. (2007). Automatic Panoramic Image Stitching Automatic 2D Stitching. International Journal of Computer Vision, 74(1), 59–73. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s11263-006-0002-3.

Cooper, K. M., Haney, B., Krieg, A., & Brownell, S. E. (2017). What’s in a name? The importance of students perceiving that an instructor knows their names in a high-enrollment Biology Classroom. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 16(1), ar8. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-08-0265.CrossRef

Cox, S. R., Wang, Y., Abdul, A., Weth, C., Von Der, & Lim, B. Y. (2021). Directed diversity: Leveraging language embedding distances for collective creativity in crowd ideation. CHI’21. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445782.

Deng, J., Guo, J., Ververas, E., Kotsia, I., & Zafeiriou, S. (2020). Retinaface: Single-shot multi-level face localisation in the wild. Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 5202–5211. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR42600.2020.00525.

Doberstein, C., Charbonneau, É., Morin, G., & Despatie, S. (2022). Measuring the acceptability of facial recognition-enabled work Surveillance Cameras in the Public and Private Sector. Public Performance and Management Review, 45(1), 198–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2021.1931374.CrossRef

Donahue, A. K., & Miller, J. M. (2006). Experience, attitudes, and willingness to pay for public safety. American Review of Public Administration, 36(4), 395–418. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074005285666.CrossRef

Dumford, A. D., & Miller, A. L. (2018). Online learning in higher education: Exploring advantages and disadvantages for engagement. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 30(3), 452–465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-018-9179-z.CrossRef

Eccles, J. S., & Roeser, R. W. (1999). School and community influences on human development. In M. H. Bornstein, & M. E. Lamb (Eds.), Developmental psychology: An advanced textbook (4th ed., pp. 503–554). L. Erlbaum.

Fagerland, M. W. (2012). t-tests, non-parametric tests, and large studies—a paradox of statistical practice? BMC Medical Research Methodology, 12(78), https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-12-78.

Fernandez-Nieto, G., An, P., Zhao, J., Shum, B., S., & Martinez-Maldonado, R. (2022). Classroom Dandelions: Visualising Participant Position, Trajectory and Body Orientation Augments Teachers’ Sensemaking. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3517736.

Feuerstein, R., Rand, Y., Hoffman, M. B., & Vig, E. (1979). The dynamic assessment of retarded performers: the learning potential assessment device, theory, instruments, and techniques. 413.

Fogg, B. J. (2009). A behavior model for persuasive design. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Persuasive Technology - Persuasive ’09, 40:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1145/1541948.1541999.

Frich, J., Biskjaer, M. M., & Dalsgaard, P. (2018). Twenty years of creativity research in human-computer interaction: Current state and future directions. DIS 2018 - Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference, 1235–1258. https://doi.org/10.1145/3196709.3196732.

Ghonsooly, B., & Hassanzadeh, T. (2019). Effect of interactionist dynamic assessment on English vocabulary learning: Cultural perspectives in focus. Issues in Educational Research, 29(1).

Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (2006). The Discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. AldineTransaction.

Glenz, T. (2014). The importance of learning students’ names. Journal on Best Teaching Practices, 1(1), 21–22.

Hafen, C. A., Hamre, B. K., Allen, J. P., Bell, C. A., Gitomer, D. H., & Pianta, R. C. (2015). Teaching through interactions in secondary School Classrooms: Revisiting the factor structure and practical application of the Classroom Assessment Scoring system–secondary. Journal of Early Adolescence, 35(5–6), 651–680. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431614537117.CrossRef

Hagenauer, G., & Volet, S. E. (2014). Teacher-student relationship at university: An important yet under-researched field. Oxford Review of Education, 40(3), 370–388. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2014.921613.CrossRef

Hamre, B. K., Pianta, R. C., Downer, J. T., DeCoster, J., Mashburn, A. J., Jones, S. M., & Hamagami, A. (2013). Teaching through interactions: Testing a Developmental Framework ofTeacher Ef fectiveness in over 4,000 classrooms. The Elementary School Journal, 113(4), 461–487. https://doi.org/10.1086/669616.CrossRef

Harper, B. (2018). Technology and teacher–student interactions: A review of empirical research. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 50(3), 214–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2018.1450690.CrossRef

He, K., Gkioxari, G., Dollar, P., Girshick, R., & Mask (2017). R-CNN. ICCV 2017.

Holstein, K., McLaren, B. M., & Aleven, V. (2018). Student learning benefits of a mixed-reality teacher awareness tool in AI-enhanced classrooms. International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, 154–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93843-1_12.

Holstein, K., McLaren, B. M., & Aleven, V. (2019). Co-designing a Real-Time Classroom Orchestration Tool to support Teacher–AI Complementarity. Journal of Learning Analytics, 6(2), 27–52. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2019.62.3.CrossRef

Jiang, G., Shi, M., An, P., Su, Y., Wang, Y., & Lim, B. Y. (2020). NaMemo: Enhancing lecturers’ interpersonal competence of remembering students’ names. DIS 2020 Companion - Companion Publication of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference. https://doi.org/10.1145/3393914.3395860.

Kelkar, S., Boushey, C. J., & Okos, M. (2015). A method to determine the density of foods using X-ray imaging. Journal of Food Engineering, 159, 36–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2015.03.012.CrossRef

Korthagen, F. A. J., Attema-Noordewier, S., & Zwart, R. C. (2014). Teacher-student contact: Exploring a basic but complicated concept. Teaching and Teacher Education, 40, 22–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.01.006.CrossRef

Kriegel, O. (2022). Encouraging Students to Participate: How to Help Shy Students Speak Up. Retrieved May 28, 2022, from https://www.wgu.edu/heyteach/article/encouraging-students-participate-how-help-shy-students-speak1809.html.

Li, L., & Yang, S. (2021). Exploring the influence of Teacher-Student Interaction on University Students’ Self-Efficacy in the flipped Classroom. Journal of Education and Learning, 10(2), 84. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v10n2p84.CrossRef

Liebenberg, L., Theron, L., Sanders, J., Munford, R., van Rensburg, A., Rothmann, S., & Ungar, M. (2016). Bolstering resilience through teacher-student interaction: Lessons for school psychologists. School Psychology International, 37(2), 140–154. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034315614689.CrossRef

Long, J. (2021). Frameworks for HCI Research. In Approaches and Frameworks for HCI Research (pp. 13–22). https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108754972.004.

Luo, Y., Lee, B., Wohn, Y., Rebar, D., Conroy, A. L., D. E., & Choe, K. (2018). E. Time for Break: Understanding Information Workers’ Sedentary Behavior Through a Break Prompting System. CHI ’18: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173701.

Malone, T. W., Laubacher, R., & Dellarocas, C. N. (2009). Harnessing crowds: Mapping the genome of collective intelligence. MIT Sloan Research Paper No, 4732–4709. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1381502.

Martinez-Maldonado, R., Mangaroska, K., Schulte, J., Elliott, D., Axisa, C., & Shum, S. B. (2020). Teacher tracking with integrity: What indoor positioning can reveal about instructional proxemics. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, 4(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1145/3381017.

Michie, S., van Stralen, M. M., & West, R. (2011a). The behaviour change wheel: A new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implementation Science, 6(1), 42. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-6-42.CrossRef

Michie, S., van Stralen, M. M., & West, R. (2011b). The behaviour change wheel: A new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implementation Science, 6(1), 42. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-6-42.CrossRef

Miller, T. (2019). Explanation in artificial intelligence: Insights from the social sciences. Artificial Intelligence, 267, 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2018.07.007.MathSciNetCrossRef

Mohr, D. C., Schueller, S. M., Montague, E., Burns, M. N., & Rashidi, P. (2014). The behavioral intervention technology model: An Integrated conceptual and Technological Framework for eHealth and mHealth Interventions. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 16(6), e146. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.3077.CrossRef

Mummah, S. A., Robinson, T. N., King, A. C., Gardner, C. D., & Sutton, S. (2016). IDEAS (integrate, Design, assess, and share): A Framework and Toolkit of Strategies for the development of more Effective Digital Interventions to change Health Behavior. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 18(12), e317. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.5927.CrossRef

Nakagawa, S., & Cuthill, I. C. (2007). Effect size, confidence interval and statistical significance: A practical guide for biologists. Biological Reviews, 82(4), 591–605. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.2007.00027.x.CrossRef

Nguyen, T. D., Cannata, M., & Miller, J. (2018). Understanding student behavioral engagement: Importance of student interaction with peers and teachers. Journal of Educational Research, 111(2), 163–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2016.1220359.CrossRef

Noble, D. (2022). Signs of a “Slow Learner” and Tips to Help Him/Her Excel. Retrieved from https://sg.theasianparent.com/slow-learners-tips-on-how-to-deal-with-a-slow-learner-child.

Oinas-Kukkonen, H. (2013). A foundation for the study of behavior change support systems. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 17(6), 1223–1235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-012-0591-5.CrossRef

Opdenakker, M. C., Maulana, R., & den Brok, P. (2012). Teacher–student interpersonal relationships and academic motivation within one school year: Developmental changes and linkage. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 23(1), 95–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2011.619198.CrossRef

Pianta, R. C. (2016). Teacher–student interactions: Measurement, impacts, improvement, and policy. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3(1), 98–105. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732215622457.CrossRef

Pianta, R. C., & Hamre, B. K. (2009). Conceptualization, measurement, and improvement of classroom processes: Standardized observation can leverage capacity. Educational Researcher, 38(2), 109–119. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X09332374.CrossRef

Poehner, M. E., & Wang, Z. (2021, October 1). Dynamic Assessment and second language development. Language Teaching, Vol. 54, pp. 472–490. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444820000555.

Pressley, M., Roehrig, A. D., Raphael, L., Dolezal, S., Bohn, C., Mohan, L., & Hogan, K. (2003). Teaching Processes in Elementary and Secondary Education. Handbook of Psychology, 153–175. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471264385.WEI0708.

Saini, M. K., & Goel, N. (2019). How smart are smart classrooms? A review of smart classroom technologies. ACM Computing Surveys, 52(6), https://doi.org/10.1145/3365757.

Saquib, N., Bose, A., George, D., & Kamvar, S. (2018). Sensei: Sensing Educational Interaction. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, 1(4), 1–27.

SAS (2022). JMP. Retrieved from https://www.jmp.com/.

Schwarzer, R. (2008). Modeling Health Behavior Change: How to predict and modify the adoption and maintenance of Health Behaviors. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 57(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.14640597.2007.00325.x.CrossRef

Smith, M., & Miller, S. (2022). The ethical application of biometric facial recognition technology. AI and Society, 37(1), 167–175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01199-9.CrossRef

Song, Q., Wang, Z., & Li, J. (2012). Residents’ behaviors, attitudes, and willingness to pay for recycling e-waste in Macau. Journal of Environmental Management, 106, 8–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.03.036.CrossRef

Sullivan, G. M., & Artino, A. R. (2013). Analyzing and Interpreting Data From Likert-Type Scales. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 5(4), 541–542. https://doi.org/10.4300/jgme-5-4-18.

Sun, H. L., Sun, T., Sha, F. Y., Gu, X. Y., Hou, X. R., Zhu, F. Y., & Fang, P. T. (2022). The influence of teacher–student Interaction on the Effects of Online Learning: Based on a serial Mediating Model. Frontiers in Psychology, 13(March), https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.779217.

Swanson, H. L., & Lussier, C. M. (2001). A selective synthesis of the experimental literature on dynamic Assessment. Review of Educational Research, 71(2), 321–363.CrossRef

Tanner, K. D. (2011). Moving theory into practice: A reflection on teaching a large, introductory biology course for majors. CBE Life Sciences Education, 10(2), 113–122. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.11-03-0029.CrossRef

Tanner, K. D. (2013). Structure matters: Twenty-one teaching strategies to promote student engagement and cultivate classroom equity. CBE Life Sciences Education, 12(3), 322–331. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.13-06-0115.MathSciNetCrossRef

Trauth, J. M., Jewell, I. K., Ricci, E., Musa, D., & Siminoff, L. (2000). Public attitudes regarding willingness to participate in medical research studies. Journal of Health and Social Policy, 12(2), 23–43. https://doi.org/10.1300/J045v12n02_02.CrossRef

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society. The Development of Higher Psychological Processes (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds.). https://doi.org/10.2307/1421493.

Wang, Y., & Reiterer, H. (2019). The point-of-choice prompt or the always-on progress bar?: A pilot study of reminders for prolonged sedentary behavior change. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290607.3313050.

Wang, D., Yang, Q., Abdul, A., & Lim, B. Y. (2019a). Designing Theory-Driven user-centric explainable AI. CHi ’19. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300831.

Wang, Y., Fadhil, A., Lange, J. P., & Reiterer, H. (2019b). Integrating Taxonomies Into Theory-Based Digital Health Interventions for Behavior Change: A holistic Framework. JMIR Research Protocols, 8(1), e8055. https://doi.org/10.2196/resprot.8055.CrossRef

Wang, Y., König, L. M., & Reiterer, H. (2021). A smartphone app to support sedentary behavior change by visualizing personal mobility patterns and Action Planning (SedVis): Development and Pilot Study. JMIR Formative Research, 5(1), e15369. https://doi.org/10.2196/15369.CrossRef

Wang, Y., Venkatesh, P., & Lim, B. Y. (2022). Interpretable Directed Diversity: Leveraging Model Explanations for Iterative Crowd Ideation. CHI 2022. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3517551.

Whitley, B. E. Jr., D. V. P., & Keith-Spiegel, D. W. B. P. (2000). A. F. W. Fairness in the Classroom. APS Observer. Retrieved from http://www.psychologicalscience.org/teaching/tips/tips_0700.html.

Wubbels, T., & Brekelmans, M. (2005). Two decades of research on teacher-student relationships in class. International Journal of Educational Research, 43(1–2), 6–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2006.03.003.CrossRef

Titel: NaMemo2: Facilitating Teacher-Student Interaction with Theory-Based Design and Student Autonomy Consideration
verfasst von: Guang Jiang
Jiahui Zhu
Yunsong Li
Pengcheng An
Yunlong Wang
Publikationsdatum: 12.08.2023
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Education and Information Technologies / Ausgabe 6/2024
Print ISSN: 1360-2357
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7608
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12059-y

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2024

Shared digital artifacts – Co-creators as beneficiaries in microlearning development

Engineering professors' habits: didactic use of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT)

The effectiveness of innovative technologies to manage vocal training: the knowledge of breathing physiology and conscious control in singing

Impact of virtual reality technologies in the context of the case method on engineering students’ competencies

Exploring the artificial intelligence anxiety and machine learning attitudes of teacher candidates

Correction: Investigating the antecedents of engagement in online learning: do achievement emotions matter?

Premium Partner