nach oben

Experimental Mechanics

Erschienen in:

20.10.2021 | Research paper

Improvement of the Arcan Setup for the Investigation of Thin Sheet Behavior Under Shear Loading

verfasst von: A. Zaplatić, Z. Tomičević, D. Čakmak, F. Hild

Erschienen in: Experimental Mechanics | Ausgabe 2/2022

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Background

Accurate predictions of thin sheet material springback during forming processes are of great interest in the forming industry. However, thin sheets are susceptible to buckling under shear loading.

Objective

The present research aims at improving the so-called Arcan setup for testing thin (1-5 mm) sheet samples with large gauge areas (i.e., width about 21 mm) by introducing anti-buckling devices to mitigate sample buckling.

Method

Three monotonic and one cyclic shear tests were carried out on 1 mm thick C60 high carbon steel.

Results

The use of the proposed anti-buckling device resulted in the suppression of sample buckling. Numerical analyses of the experiment where buckling was eliminated revealed predominant shear stress states in the gauge area (i.e., stress triaxiality = 0), which highlights minor influences of the anti-buckling device on the sample stress state.

Conclusion

To suppress buckling, the use of anti-buckling devices was essential. Moreover, the friction coefficient between the sample and the proposed devices was calibrated (\(\mu = 0.33\)) in addition to kinematic hardening parameters.

Vorheriger Artikel Dynamics of Miniature and High-Compliance Structures: Experimental Characterization and Modeling

Nächster Artikel Damage Quantification via Digital Volume Correlation with Heterogeneous Mechanical Regularization: Application to an In situ Meso-Flexural Test on Mortar

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Tisza M (2005) Numerical modeling and simulation in sheet metal forming academic and industrial perspectives. Mater Sci Forum 473–474:407–414. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.473-474.407CrossRef

Ghosh AK, Bae DG (2000) A planar simple shear test and flow behavior in a superplastic Al-Mg alloy. Metall Mater Trans 34(11):2465–2471. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-003-0006-3CrossRef

Rauch EF (1998) Plastic anisotropy of sheet metals determined by simple shear tests. Mater Sci Eng A 241(1–2):179–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5093(97)00486-3CrossRef

Bouvier S, Haddadi H, Levée P, Teodosiu C (2006) Simple shear tests: Experimental techniques and characterization of the plastic anisotropy of rolled sheets at large strains. J Mater Process Technol 172(1):96–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.09.003CrossRef

Abedini A, Noder J, Kohar CP, Butcher C (2020) Accounting for Shear Anisotropy and Material Frame Rotation on the Constitutive Characterization of Automotive Alloys using Simple Shear Tests. Mech Mater 148:103419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmat.2020.103419CrossRef

Miyauchi K (1984) A proposal of a planar simple shear test in sheet metals. Sci Pap Inst Phys Chem Res 78(3):27–40

Peirs J, Verleysen P, Degrieck J (2012) Novel technique for static and dynamic shear testing of Ti6Al4V sheet. Exp Mech 52(7):729–741. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-011-9541-9CrossRef

Roth CC, Mohr D (2016) Ductile fracture experiments with locally proportional loading histories. Int J Plast 79:328–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2015.08.004CrossRef

ASTM (2005) ASTM B831-05, Standard test method for shear testing of thin aluminum alloy products, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1520/B0831-05

10.

Merklein M, Biasutti M (2011)Forward and reverse simple shear test experiments for material modeling in forming simulations. Special Edition: 10th International Conference on Technology of Plasticity, ICTP 2011, pp. 702–707

11.

Yin Q, Zillmann B, Suttner S, Gerstein G, Biasutti M, Tekkaya AE, Wagner MFX, Merklein M, Schaper M, Halle T, Brosius A (2014) An experimental and numerical investigation of different shear test configurations for sheet metal characterization. Int J Solids Struct 51(5):1066–1074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2013.12.006CrossRef

12.

Bao Y, Wierzbicki T (2004) A comparative study on various ductile crack formation criteria. J Eng Mater Technol Trans ASME 126(3):314–324. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1755244CrossRef

13.

Reyes A, Eriksson M, Lademo OG, Hopperstad OS, Langseth M (2009) Assessment of yield and fracture criteria using shear and bending tests. Mater Des 30(3):596–608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2008.05.045CrossRef

14.

Roth CC, Mohr D (2018) Determining the strain to fracture for simple shear for a wide range of sheet metals. Int J Mech Sci 149:224–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.10.007CrossRef

15.

Roth CC, Mohr D (2015) Experimental investigation on shear fracture at high strain rates. EPJ Web Conf. 94:3–6. https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/20159401078CrossRef

16.

Iosipescu N (1967) New accurate procedure for single shear testing of metals. J Mater 2(3):537–566

17.

Mohr D, Henn S (2007) Calibration of stress-triaxiality dependent crack formation criteria: a new hybrid experimental-numerical method. Exp Mech 47(6):805–820. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-007-9039-7CrossRef

18.

Mohr D, Oswald M (2008) A new experimental technique for the multi-axial testing of advanced high strength steel sheets. Exp Mech 48(1):65–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-007-9053-9CrossRef

19.

Mohr D, Doyoyo M (2003) A new method for the biaxial testing of cellular solids. Exp Mech 43(2):173–182. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02410498CrossRef

20.

Arcan M, Hashin Z, Voloshin A (1978) A method to produce uniform plane-stress states with applications to fiber-reinforced materials. Exp Mech 18(4):141–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02324146CrossRef

21.

Dunand M, Mohr D (2011) Optimized butterfly specimen for the fracture testing of sheet materials under combined normal and shear loading. Eng Fract Mech 78(17):2919–2934. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2011.08.008CrossRef

22.

Abedini A, Butcher C, Anderson D, Worswick M, Skszek T (2015) Fracture characterization of automotive alloys in shear loading. SAE Int J Mater Manuf 8:3. https://doi.org/10.4271/2015-01-052810.4271/2015-01-0528CrossRef

23.

Abedini A, Butcher C, Worswick MJ (2017) Fracture characterization of rolled sheet alloys in shear loading: Studies of specimen geometry, anisotropy, and rate sensitivity. Exp Mech 57(1):75–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-016-0211-9CrossRef

24.

Peshekhodov I, Jiang S, Vucetic M, Bouguecha A, Berhens BA (2016) Experimental-numerical evaluation of a new butterfly specimen for fracture characterisation of AHSS in a wide range of stress states. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng 159:1. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/159/1/012015CrossRef

25.

Boni S, G’Sell C, Weynant E, Haudin JM (1982) Microscopic in situ observation of the plastic deformation of polybutene-1 films under simple shear. Polym Test 3(1):3–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-9418(82)90009-5CrossRef

26.

Pucillo GP, Grasso M, Penta F, Pinto P (2011) On the mechanical characterization of materials by Arcan-type specimens. Eng Fract Mech 78(8):1729–1741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2011.02.002CrossRef

27.

Grédiac M, Hild F (eds) (2012) Full-field measurements and identification in solid mechanics. ISTE / Wiley, London (UK)

28.

Pham CH, Adzima F, Coer J, Manach PY (2017) Anti-buckling device for ultra-thin metallic sheets under large and reversed shear strain paths. Exp Mech 57(4):593–602. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-017-0256-4CrossRef

29.

Bertin M, Hild F, Roux S (2017) On the identifiability of the Hill-1948 model with one uniaxial tensile test. Comptes Rendus Mécanique 345(6):363–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crme.2017.04.001CrossRef

30.

Bertin M, Hild F, Roux S (2017) On the identifiability of Hill-1948 plasticity model with a single biaxial test on very thin sheet. Strain 53(5):e12233. https://doi.org/10.1111/str.12233CrossRef

31.

Dufour J, Beaubier B, Roux S, Hild F (2014) Displacement measurement using CAD-based stereo-correlation with meshes. In ICEM conference. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06986-9_34

32.

Dubreuil L, Dufour JE, Quinsat Y, Hild F (2016) Mesh-based shape measurements with stereocorrelation. Exp Mech 56(7):1231–1242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-016-0158-xCrossRef

33.

Pierré JE, Passieux JC, Périé JN (2017) Finite element stereo digital image correlation: Framework and mechanical regularization. Exp Mech 57(3):443–456. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-016-0246-yCrossRef

34.

EikoSim Company (2020) EikoTwin DIC.https://eikosim.com/en/eikotwin-2/

35.

Beaubier B, Dufour J, Hild F, Roux S, Lavernhe-Taillard S, Lavernhe-Taillard K (2014) CAD-based calibration of a 3D-DIC system: Principle and application on test and industrial parts. Exp Mech 54(3):329–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4235-6_32CrossRef

36.

Dufour JE, Beaubier B, Hild F, Roux S (2015) CAD-based displacement measurements. Principle and first validations. Exp Mech 55(9):1657–1668. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-015-0065-6CrossRef

37.

Hild F, Bouterf A, Roux S (2015) Damage measurements via DIC. Int J Fract 191(1–2):77–105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-015-0004-7CrossRef

38.

Armstrong P, Frederick C (1966) A mathematical representation of the multiaxial bauschinger effect. C.E.G.B. Rep. RD/B/N66

39.

Tarantola A (1987) Inverse problems theory. Methods for data fitting and model parameter estimation. Elsevier Applied Science, Southampton (UK)MATH

40.

Mathieu F, Leclerc H, Hild F, Roux S (2015) Estimation of elastoplastic parameters via weighted FEMU and integrated-DIC. Exp Mech 55(1):105–119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-014-9888-9

41.

Coulomb C (1821) Theorie des machines simples (in French). Bachelier, Paris (France)

42.

Rabbe LM, Rieu J, Lopez A, Combrade P (1994) Fretting deterioration of orthopaedic implant materials: Search for solutions. Clin Mater 15:221–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/0267-6605(94)90049-3CrossRef

43.

Nuño N, Amabili M, Groppetti R, Rossi A (2001) Static coefficient of friction between Ti-6A1-4V and PMMA for cemented hip and knee implants. J Biomed Mater Res 59(1):191–200. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.1233CrossRef

44.

Lim A, Castagne S, Wong CC (2014) Effect of friction coefficient on finite element modeling of the deep - cold rolling process. In Int Conf Shot Peen, pp. 376–380

45.

Nuño N, Groppetti R, Senin N (2006) Static coefficient of friction between stainless steel and PMMA used in cemented hip and knee implants. Clin Biomech 21(9):956–962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2006.05.008CrossRef

Titel: Improvement of the Arcan Setup for the Investigation of Thin Sheet Behavior Under Shear Loading
verfasst von: A. Zaplatić
Z. Tomičević
D. Čakmak
F. Hild
Publikationsdatum: 20.10.2021
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Experimental Mechanics / Ausgabe 2/2022
Print ISSN: 0014-4851
Elektronische ISSN: 1741-2765
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-021-00762-1

Premium Partner

Marktübersichten

Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen.

Zur Marktübersicht

Springer Professional

Abstract

Background

Objective

Method

Results

Conclusion

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2022

Universal Calibration Constants for Strain Gauge Hole-Drilling Residual Stress Measurements

Comparison Between Surface and Near-Surface Residual Stress Measurement Techniques Using a Standard Four-Point-Bend Specimen

Correction to: Hard‑material Adhesion: Which Scales of Roughness Matter?

Dynamics of Miniature and High-Compliance Structures: Experimental Characterization and Modeling

Adaptive Rotated Gaussian Weighted Digital Image Correlation (RGW-DIC) for Heterogeneous Deformation Measurement

The Symmpact: A Direct-Impact Hopkinson Bar Setup Suitable for Investigating Dynamic Equilibrium in Low-Impedance Materials

Premium Partner

Marktübersichten