nach oben

Journal of International Entrepreneurship

03.04.2024

Intellectual framework for knowledge-intensive innovative entrepreneurship

verfasst von: Eliane Martins de Paiva, Priscila Rezende da Costa

Erschienen in: Journal of International Entrepreneurship

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

The knowledge-intensive innovation and entrepreneurship ecosystems literature is evolving in quantity and popularity in academia. Assuming that the studies on these themes are closely related and are still under development, this research seeks to determine how the intellectual framework of knowledge-intensive innovative entrepreneurship (KIE) is framed. The goal is to map bibliographic production by referring to the knowledge-intensive innovation and entrepreneurship ecosystem. We adopted the bibliometric method of citation and cocitation to analyze scientific publications from 2010 to 2020 in journals indexed in the Web of Science (WoS) database. An exploratory factor analysis identified three clusters by stimulating the creation of new ventures and knowledge flow and sharing. The first cluster alludes to the impact of knowledge on economic activities; the second explores the entrepreneurial ecosystem; and the third is more heterogeneous and leads to the theoretical and critical aspects of KIE. This study provides an opportunity to analyze the relationship between knowledge-intensive innovation and the entrepreneurship ecosystem. Thus, this study may guide researchers to access the microfoundations of knowledge-intensive innovation and entrepreneurship ecosystems in their future studies once it reveals seminal research on this specific domain.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Buzz are learning processes that occur between actors inserted in a community for a simple fact of being in it (Bathelt, Malmberg and Maskell 2004).

Pipelines means knowledge gained from investing in communication channels buildings (Bathelt, Malmberg and Maskell 2004).

Abrahamsson J, Boter H, Vanyushyn V (2019) Business model innovation of international new ventures: an empirical study in a Swedish context. J Int Entrep 17:75–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10843-018-0238-3CrossRef

Acs JS (2002) Innovation and the growth of cities. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham

Acs ZJ, Anselin L, Varga A (2002) Patents and innovation counts as measures of regional production of new knowledge. Res Policy 31:1069–1085. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00184-6CrossRef

Acs ZJ, Audretsch DB, Lehmann EE (2013) The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship. Small Bus Econ 41:757–774. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-013-9505-9CrossRef

Ács ZJ, Autio E, Szerb L (2014) National systems of entrepreneurship: measurement issues and policy implications. Res Policy 43:476–494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.08.016CrossRef

Acs ZJ, Braunerhjelm P, Audretsch DB, Carlsson B (2009) The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship. Small Bus Econ 32:15–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-008-9157-3CrossRef

Acs ZJ, Plummer LA (2005) Penetrating the ``knowledge filter” in regional economies. Ann Reg Sci 39:439–456. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-005-0245-xCrossRef

Acs ZJ, Stam E, Audretsch DB, O’Connor A (2017) The lineages of the entrepreneurial ecosystem approach. Small Bus Econ 49:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-017-9864-8CrossRef

Acs ZJ, Szerb L (2011) The global entrepreneurship and development index 2011. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham

Acs ZJ, Varga A (2005) Entrepreneurship, agglomeration and technological change. Small Bus Econ 24(3):323–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11187-005-1998-4CrossRef

Agarwal R, Audretsch D, Sarkar M (2010) Knowledge spillovers and strategic entrepreneurship: knowledge Spillovers and Strategic Entrepreneurship. StratEntrepreneurship J 4:271–283. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.96CrossRef

Almeida P, Kogut B (1999) Localization of knowledge and the mobility of engineers in regional networks. Manage Sci 45:905–917. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.45.7.905CrossRef

Alvedalen J, Boschma R (2017) A critical review of entrepreneurial ecosystems research: toward a future research agenda. Eur Plan Stud 25:887–903. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2017.1299694CrossRef

Alves AC, Fischer B, Vonortas NS, Queiroz SRRD (2019) Configurations of Knowledge-intensive Entrepreneurial Ecosystems. Rev Adm Empres 59:242–257. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0034-759020190403CrossRef

Amore MD, Schneider C, Žaldokas A (2013) Credit supply and corporate innovation. J Financ Econ 109:835–855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2013.04.006CrossRef

Anselin L, Varga A, Acs Z (1997) Local geographic spillovers between university research and high technology innovations. J Urban Econ 42:422–448. https://doi.org/10.1006/juec.1997.2032CrossRef

Armington C, Acs ZJ (2002) The determinants of regional variation in new firm formation. Reg Stud 36:33–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400120099843CrossRef

Arrow KJ (1962a) Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. In: The rate and direction of inventive activity. Princeton University Press, pp 609–626

Arrow KJ (1962b) The economic implications of learning by doing. Rev Econ Stud 29:155. https://doi.org/10.2307/2295952CrossRef

Asheim BT, Boschma R, Cooke P (2011) Constructing regional advantage: platform policies based on related variety and differentiated knowledge bases. Reg Stud 45:893–904. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2010.543126CrossRef

Audretsch DB (1995) Innovation and industry evolution. MA: MIT Press, Cambridge

Audretsch D, Dohse D, Niebuhr A (2010) Cultural diversity and entrepreneurship: a regional analysis for Germany. Ann Reg Sci 45:55–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-009-0291-xCrossRef

Audretsch DB, Belitski M (2017) Entrepreneurial ecosystems in cities: establishing the framework conditions. J Technol Transf 42:1030–1051. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-016-9473-8CrossRef

Audretsch DB, Belitski M (2013) The missing pillar: the creativity theory of knowledge spillover entrepreneurship. Small Bus Econ 41:819–836. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-013-9508-6CrossRef

Audretsch DB, Cunningham JA, Kuratko DF et al (2019) Entrepreneurial ecosystems: economic, technological, and societal impacts. J Technol Transf 44:313–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-018-9690-4CrossRef

Audretsch DB, Feldman MP (1996) R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. Am Econ Rev 86(3):630–640. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2118216

Audretsch DB, Feldman MP (2004) Chapter 61 Knowledge spillovers and the geography of innovation. In: Handbook of regional and urban economics. Elsevier, pp 2713–2739

Audretsch DB, Keilbach M (2004) Entrepreneurship capital and economic performance. Reg Stud 38(8):949–959. https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340042000280956CrossRef

Audretsch DB, Keilbach M (2008) Resolving the knowledge paradox: Knowledge-spillover entrepreneurship and economic growth. Res Policy 37:1697–1705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.08.008CrossRef

Audretsch DB, Keilbach M (2007) The Theory of knowledge spillover entrepreneurship. J Management Studies 44:1242–1254. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00722.xCrossRef

Audretsch DB, Keilbach MC, Lehmann E (2006) Entrepreneurship and economic growth. Oxford Univ. Press, OxfordCrossRef

Audretsch DB, Lehmann EE (2005) Does the knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship hold for regions? Res Policy 34:1191–1202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.03.012CrossRef

Audretsch DB, Stephan PE (1996) Company-scientist locational links: the case of biotechnology. Am Econ Rev 86:641–652

Audretsch DB, Thurik AR (2001) What’s new about thenew economy? Sources of growth in the managed andentrepreneurial economies. Ind Corp Chang 10(1):267–315. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/10.1.267CrossRef

Autio E, Kenney M, Mustar P et al (2014) Entrepreneurial innovation: the importance of context. Res Policy 43:1097–1108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.01.015CrossRef

Autio E, Nambisan S, Thomas LDW, Wright M (2018) Digital affordances, spatial affordances, and the genesis of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Strateg Entrep J 12:72–95. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1266CrossRef

Bacigalupo M, Kampylis P, Punie Y, Van den Brande G (2016) EntreComp: the entrepreneurship competence framework., EUR 27939. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg

Bathelt H, Malmberg A, Maskell P (2004) Clusters and knowledge: local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation. Prog Hum Geogr 28:31–56. https://doi.org/10.1191/0309132504ph469oaCrossRef

Bedő Z, Erdős K, Pittaway L (2020) University-centered entrepreneurial ecosystems in resource-constrained contexts. JSBED 27:1149–1166. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-02-2020-0060CrossRef

Bermeo Giraldo MC, Ruíz Castañeda WL, Villalba Morales ML (2021) Producción científica sobre el proceso de transferencia de conocimiento y tecnología en universidades: un análisis bibliométrico. Rev.virtual univ catol norte 277–311. https://doi.org/10.35575/rvucn.n63a11

Binz C, Truffer B, Coenen L (2014) Why space matters in technological innovation systems—mapping global knowledge dynamics of membrane bioreactor technology. Res Policy 43:138–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.07.002CrossRef

Bogers M, Zobel A-K, Afuah A et al (2017) The open innovation research landscape: established perspectives and emerging themes across different levels of analysis. Ind Innov 24:8–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2016.1240068CrossRef

Borgatti SP, Everett MG, Freeman LC (2002) Ucinet for Windows: software for social network analysis. Harvard MA: Analytic Technologies 6:12–15

Boschma R (2005) Proximity and innovation: a critical assessment. Reg Stud 39:61–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340052000320887CrossRef

Boschma R, Coenen L, Frenken K, Truffer B (2017) Toward a theory of regional diversification: combining insights from Evolutionary Economic Geography and Transition Studies. Reg Stud 51:31–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2016.1258460CrossRef

Braunerhjelm P, Acs ZJ, Audretsch DB, Carlsson B (2010) The missing link: knowledge diffusion and entrepreneurship in endogenous growth. Small Bus Econ 34:105–125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-009-9235-1CrossRef

Breschi S, Lissoni F (2001) Knowledge spillovers and local innovation systems: a critical survey. Ind Corp Chang 10:975–1005. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/10.4.975CrossRef

Breuillot A, Bocquet R, Favre-Bonté V (2022) Navigating the internationalization process: strategic resources for early internationalizing firms. J Int Entrep 20:282–315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10843-022-00308-zCrossRef

Brinkerhoff JM (2016) Defining entrepreneurs and exploring diaspora applications. Institutional reform and diaspora entrepreneurs: the in-between advantage D exploring 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof

Brown R, Mason C (2017) Looking inside the spiky bits: a critical review and conceptualization of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Small Bus Econ 49:11–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-017-9865-7CrossRef

Calabuig-Moreno F, Gonzalez-Serrano MH, Alonso-Dos-Santos M, Gómez-Tafalla A (2021) Entrepreneurial ecosystems, knowledge spillovers, and their embeddedness in the sport field: a bibliometric and content analysis. Knowl Manag Res Pract 19:65–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/14778238.2020.1752120CrossRef

Cerver-Romero E, Ferreira JJ, Fernandes C (2020) A scientometric analysis of knowledge spillover research. J Technol Transf 45:780–805. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-018-9698-9CrossRef

Cobo MJ, López-Herrera AG, Herrera-Viedma E, Herrera F (2011) An approach for detecting, quantifying, and visualizing the evolution of a research field: a practical application to the Fuzzy Sets Theory field. J Informet 5:146–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.10.002CrossRef

Cohen B (2006) Sustainable valley entrepreneurial ecosystems. Bus Strat Env 15:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.428CrossRef

Cohen WM, Levinthal DA (1990) Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Adm Sci Q 35:128. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553CrossRef

Elo M, Sandberg S, Servais P et al (2018) Advancing the views on migrant and diaspora entrepreneurs in international entrepreneurship. J Int Entrep 16:119–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10843-018-0231-xCrossRef

Etemad H (2017) Toward an emerging evolutionary life-cycle theory of internationalized entrepreneurial firms: from born globals to borderless firms? J Int Entrep 15:111–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10843-017-0204-5CrossRef

Etemad H (2021) The evolutionary trends of international entrepreneurship in the past two decades: the state of the field in the face of COVID-19’s global crisis. J Int Entrep 19:149–163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10843-021-00299-3CrossRef

Etemad H (2019) Revisiting interactions of entrepreneurial, marketing, and other orientations with internationalization strategies. J Int Entrep 17:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10843-019-00243-6CrossRef

Feld B (2012) Startup communities: building an entrepreneurial ecosystem in your city. John Wiley & Sons Inc, Hoboken, New JerseyCrossRef

Feldman MP (2001) The entrepreneurial event revisited: firm formation in a regional context. Ind Corp Chang 10(4):861–891. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/10.4.861CrossRef

Feldman MP (2014) The character of innovative places: entrepreneurial strategy, economic development, and prosperity. Small Bus Econ 43:9–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-014-9574-4CrossRef

Feldman MP, Audretsch DB (1999) Innovation in cities: science-based diversity, specialization and localized competition. Eur Econ Rev 43(2):409–429. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-2921(98)00047-6CrossRef

Feldman M, Francis J, Bercovitz J (2005) Creating a cluster while building a firm: entrepreneurs and the formation of industrial clusters. Reg Stud 39:129–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340052000320888CrossRef

Fini R, Grimaldi R, Santoni S, Sobrero M (2011) Complements or substitutes? The role of universities and local context in supporting the creation of academic spin-offs. Res Policy 40:1113–1127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.05.013CrossRef

Florida RL (2002) The rise of the creative class: and how it's transforming work, leisure, community and everyday life. Basic Books, New York

Galan N, Torsein E (2021) Identification of international opportunities: a study of mature firms in mature industries. J Int Entrep 19:53–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10843-020-00277-1CrossRef

Ghio N, Guerini M, Lehmann EE, Rossi-Lamastra C (2015) The emergence of the knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship. Small Bus Econ 44:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-014-9588-yCrossRef

Glaeser E, Kallal H, Scheinkman JA, Shleifer A (1992) Growth in cities. J Polit Econ 100(6):1126–1152. https://doi.org/10.1086/261856CrossRef

Grabher G (1993) The embedded firm. Routledge, London and New York

Griliches Z (1979) Issues in assessing the contribution of research and development to productivity growth. The Bell Journal of Economics 10:92. https://doi.org/10.2307/3003321CrossRef

Griliches Z (1990) Patent statistics as economic indicators: a survey. J Econ Lit 28(4):1661–1707. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2727442

Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, et al (2009) Análise multivariada de dados, 6th edn. Bookman

Hayter CS (2016) A trajectory of early-stage spinoff success: the role of knowledge intermediaries within an entrepreneurial university ecosystem. Small Bus Econ 47:633–656. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-016-9756-3CrossRef

Hayter CS (2013) Conceptualizing knowledge-based entrepreneurship networks: perspectives from the literature. Small Bus Econ 41:899–911. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-013-9512-xCrossRef

Huggins R, Thompson P (2015) Entrepreneurship, innovation and regional growth: a network theory. Small Bus Econ 45:103–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-015-9643-3CrossRef

Ierapetritis DG (2019) Discussing the role of universities in fostering regional entrepreneurial ecosystems. Economies 7:119. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies7040119CrossRef

Isenberg D (2011) The entrepreneurship ecosystem strategy as a new paradigm for economic policy: principles for cultivating entrepreneurship. Present Inst Int Euro Aff 1:1–13

Isenberg DJ (2010) How to start an entrepreneurial revolution. Harv Bus Rev 88:40–50

Jacobs J (1969) The economy of cities. Random House, New York

Jaffe AB (1989) Real effects of academic research. Am Econ Rev 79:957–970

Jaffe AB, Trajtenberg M, Henderson R (1993) Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Q J Econ 108:577–598. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118401CrossRef

Kautonen T, van Gelderen M, Fink M (2015) Robustness of the theory of planned behavior in predicting entrepreneurial intentions and actions. Entrep Theory Pract 39:655–674. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12056CrossRef

Korhonen S, Leppäaho T (2019) Well-trodden highways and roads less traveled: Entrepreneurial-oriented behavior and identity construction in international entrepreneurship narratives. J Int Entrep 17:355–388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10843-019-00246-3CrossRef

Kovács A, Van Looy B, Cassiman B (2015) Exploring the scope of open innovation: a bibliometric review of a decade of research. Scientometrics 104:951–983. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1628-0CrossRef

Lai Y, Vonortas NS (2019) Regional entrepreneurial ecosystems in China. Ind Corp Chang 28:875–897. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtz035CrossRef

Lee SY, Florida R, Ács Z (2004) Creativity and entrepreneurship: a regional analysis of new firm formation. Reg Stud 38(8):879–891. https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340042000280910CrossRef

Lucas RE (1988) On the mechanics of economic development. J Monet Econ 22:3–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3932(88)90168-7CrossRef

Malerba F, McKelvey M (2020) Knowledge-intensive innovative entrepreneurship integrating Schumpeter, evolutionary economics, and innovation systems. Small Bus Econ 54:503–522. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-018-0060-2CrossRef

Marshall A (1920) Principles of economics (8a ed.). Macmillan, London

Martin R, Sunley P (2003) Deconstructing clusters: chaotic concept or policy panacea? J Econ Geogr 3:5–35. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/3.1.5CrossRef

Martin RL, Sunley PJ (2006) Path dependence and regional economic evolution. J Econ Geogr 6(4):395–437. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbl012CrossRef

Mason C, Brown R (2014) Entrepreneurial ecosystems and growth oriented entrepreneurship. Final report to OECD, Paris 30:77–102

Merigó JM, Gil-Lafuente AM, Yager RR (2015) An overview of fuzzy research with bibliometric indicators. Appl Soft Comput 27:420–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2014.10.035CrossRef

Moore JF (1993) Predators and prey: a new ecology of competition. Harv Bus Rev 71:75–86

Moral-Muñoz JA, Herrera-Viedma E, Santisteban-Espejo A, Cobo MJ (2020) Software tools for conducting bibliometric analysis in science: an up-to-date review. EPI 29. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.ene.03

Mueller P (2006) Exploring the knowledge filter: how entrepreneurship and university–industry relationships drive economic growth. Res Policy 35:1499–1508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.09.023CrossRef

Neck HM, Meyer GD, Cohen B, Corbett AC (2004) An entrepreneurial system view of new venture creation. J Small Bus Manag 42:190–208. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-627X.2004.00105.xCrossRef

Onkelinx J, Manolova TS, Edelman LF (2016) The human factor: Investments in employee human capital, productivity, and SME internationalization. J Int Manag 22:351–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2016.05.002CrossRef

Pasadeos Y, Phelps J, Kim B-H (1998) Disciplinary impact of advertising scholars: temporal comparisons of influential authors, works and research networks. J Advert 27:53–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.1998.10673569CrossRef

Paul J, Criado AR (2020) The art of writing literature review: what do we know and what do we need to know? Int Bus Rev 29:101717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2020.101717CrossRef

Persson O (2010) Are highly cited papers more international? Scientometrics 83:397–401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0007-0CrossRef

Porter ME (2000) Location, competition and economic development: local clusters in the global economy. Econ Dev Q 14(1):15–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124240001400105CrossRef

Qian H, Acs ZJ (2013) An absorptive capacity theory of knowledge spillover entrepreneurship. Small Bus Econ 40:185–197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-011-9368-xCrossRef

Qian H, Acs ZJ, Stough RR (2013) Regional systems of entrepreneurship: the nexus of human capital, knowledge and new firm formation. J Econ Geogr 13:559–587. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbs009CrossRef

Quevedo-Silva F, Almeida Santos EB, Brandão MM, Vils L (2016) Estudo Bibliométrico: Orientações sobre sua Aplicação. Rev Bras Mark 15:246–262. https://doi.org/10.5585/remark.v15i2.3274CrossRef

Reynolds P, Storey DJ, Westhead P (1994) Cross-national comparisons of the variation in new firm formation rates. Reg Stud 28(4):443–456. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343409412331348386CrossRef

Rodríguez-Pose A, Crescenzi R (2008) Research and development, spillovers, innovation systems, and the genesis of regional growth in Europe. Reg Stud 42(1):51–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400701654186CrossRef

Romer PM (1990) Endogenous technological change. J Polit Econ 98(5):S71–S102. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2937632

Romer PM (1997) Endogenous technological change’, Journal of Political Economy, 98 (5), Part 2, S71–S102. Int Libr Crit Writings Econ 77:250–281

Romer PM (1986) Increasing returns and long-run growth. J Polit Econ 94:1002–1037. https://doi.org/10.1086/261420CrossRef

Rossetto DE, Bernardes RC, Borini FM, Gattaz CC (2018) Structure and evolution of innovation research in the last 60 years: review and future trends in the field of business through the citations and cocitations analysis. Scientometrics 115:1329–1363. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2709-7CrossRef

Sansone G, Ughetto E, Landoni P (2021) Entrepreneurial intention: an analysis of the role of student-led entrepreneurial organizations. J Int Entrep 19:399–433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10843-021-00288-6CrossRef

Schüler D (2022) Institutional change and entrepreneurship as occupational choice—the case of South Korea. J Int Entrep. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10843-022-00313-2CrossRef

Schumpeter J (1934) The theory of economic development. Mass: Harvard University Press, Cambridge

Serra FAR, Cirani CBS, Moutinho JDA (2019) Dicas sobre Estudos Bibliométricos Dúvidas Frequentes Relacionadas ao Comentário Editorial doing bibliometric reviews for the Ibero-American Journal of Strategic Management -RIAE 17 (3), pp. 1–16 (2018). RIAE 18:01–08. https://doi.org/10.5585/ijsm.v18i3.15940

Serra FAR, Ferreira MP, de Guerrazzi LAC, Scaciotta VV (2018) Doing bibliometric reviews for the Ibero-American journal of strategic management. RIAE 17:01–16. https://doi.org/10.5585/ijsm.v17i3.2713CrossRef

Shane S, Venkataraman S (2000) The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Acad Manag Rev 25(1):217–226. https://doi.org/10.2307/259271CrossRef

Shang T, Miao X, Abdul W (2019) A historical review and bibliometric analysis of disruptive innovation. IJIS 11:208–226. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIS-05-2018-0056CrossRef

Small H (1973) Cocitation in the scientific literature: a new measure of the relationship between two documents. J Am Soc Inf Sci 24:265–269. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630240406CrossRef

Solow RM (1957) Technical change and the aggregate production function. Rev Econ Stat 39:312. https://doi.org/10.2307/1926047CrossRef

Spigel B (2017) The relational organization of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Entrep Theory Pract 41:49–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12167CrossRef

Spigel B, Harrison R (2018) Toward a process theory of entrepreneurial ecosystems: toward a process theory of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Strateg Entrep J 12:151–168. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1268CrossRef

Stam E (2015) Entrepreneurial ecosystems and regional policy: a sympathetic critique. Eur Plan Stud 23:1759–1769. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2015.1061484CrossRef

Storper M, Venables AJ (2004) Buzz: face-to-face contact and the urban economy. J Econ Geogr 4:351–370. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnlecg/lbh027CrossRef

Sussan F, Acs ZJ (2017) The digital entrepreneurial ecosystem. Small Bus Econ 49:55–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-017-9867-5CrossRef

Szerb L, Ács Z, Autio E, Ortega-Argilés R, Komlósi É (2013) The regional entrepreneurship and development index–measuring regional entrepreneurship. Technical report. European Commission, Luxembourg. Retrieved from http://real.mtak.hu/21512/

Tontodimamma A, Nissi E, Sarra A, Fontanella L (2021) Thirty years of research into hate speech: topics of interest and their evolution. Scientometrics 126:157–179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03737-6CrossRef

Valkokari K (2015) Business, innovation, and knowledge ecosystems: how they differ and how to survive and thrive within them. Technol Innov Manag Rev 5:17–24. https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/919CrossRef

Vuorio A, Torkkeli L, Sainio L-M (2020) Service innovation and internationalization in SMEs: antecedents and profitability outcomes. J Int Entrep 18:92–123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10843-019-00266-zCrossRef

Wright M, Siegel DS, Mustar P (2017) An emerging ecosystem for student start-ups. J Technol Transf 42:909–922. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-017-9558-zCrossRef

Wurth B, Stam E, Spigel B (2022) Toward an entrepreneurial ecosystem research program. Entrep Theory Pract 46:729–778. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258721998948CrossRef

Zucker LG, Darby MR, Brewer MB (1998) Intellectual human capital and the birth of US biotechnology enterprises. American Economics Review 88 (1) 290–306. Intellectual Capital and Financing Decisions: Evidence from the US Patent Data 23:8

Zupic I, Čater T (2015) Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organ Res Methods 18:429–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629CrossRef

Zyoud SH, Sweileh WM, Awang R, Al-Jabi SW (2018) Global trends in research related to social media in psychology: mapping and bibliometric analysis. Int J Ment Health Syst 12:4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13033-018-0182-6CrossRef

Titel: Intellectual framework for knowledge-intensive innovative entrepreneurship
verfasst von: Eliane Martins de Paiva
Priscila Rezende da Costa
Publikationsdatum: 03.04.2024
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Journal of International Entrepreneurship
Print ISSN: 1570-7385
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7349
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10843-024-00351-y

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Premium Partner