Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen
Providing people with information is considered an important first step in encouraging them to behave sustainably as it influences their consumption beliefs, attitudes and intentions. However, too much information can also complicate these processes and negatively affect behaviour. This is exacerbated when people have accepted the need to live a more sustainable lifestyle and attempt to enact its principles. Drawing on interview data with people committed to sustainability, we identify the contentious role of knowledge in further disrupting sustainable consumption ideals. Here, knowledge is more than just information; it is familiarity and expertise (or lack of it) or how information is acted upon. We find that more knowledge represents a source of dilemma, tension and paralysis. Our data reveal a dark side to people’s knowledge, leading to a ‘self-inflicted sustainable consumption paradox’ in their attempts to lead a sustainable consumption lifestyle. Implications for policy interventions are discussed.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. CrossRef
Ajzen, I., & Madden, T. J. (1986). Prediction of goal-directed behaviour: Attitudes, intentions and perceived behavioural control. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22(5), 453–474. CrossRef
Alba, J. W., & Hutchinson, J. W. (1987). Dimensions of consumer expertise. Journal of Consumer Research, 13(4), 411–454. CrossRef
Alba, J. W., & Hutchinson, J. W. (2000). Knowledge calibration: What consumers know and what they think they know. Journal of Consumer Research, 27(2), 123–156. CrossRef
Arnold, S., & Fischer, E. (1994). Hermeneutics and consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(1), 55–70. CrossRef
Arnould, E. J., & Thompson, C. J. (2007). Consumer culture theory (and we really mean theoretics): Dilemmas and opportunities posed by an academic branding strategy. In R. Belk & J. F. Sherry Jr. (Eds.), Consumer culture theory research in consumer behavior (Vol. 11, pp. 3–22). Oxford: Elsevier.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. CrossRef
Burgess, J., Harrison, C. M., & Filius, P. (1998). Environmental communication and the cultural politics of environmental citizenship. Environment and Planning A, 30(8), 1445–1460. CrossRef
Carrigan, M., & Attalla, A. (2001). The myth of the ethical consumer—Do ethics matter in purchase behaviour? Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18(7), 560–577. CrossRef
Carrington, M. J., Neville, B. A., & Whitwell, G. J. (2010). Why ethical consumers don’t walk their talk: Towards a framework for understanding the gap between the ethical purchase intentions and actual buying behaviour of ethically minded consumers. Journal of Business Ethics, 9(1), 139–158. doi: 10.1007/s10551-010-0501-6. CrossRef
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behaviour: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Goulding, C. (1999). Consumer research, interpretive paradigms, and methodological ambiguities. European Journal of Marketing, 33(9/10), 859–873. CrossRef
Graafland, J. J. (2003). Distribution of responsibility, ability and competition. Journal of Business Ethics, 45(1), 133–147. CrossRef
Iyer, G. (1999). Business, consumers and sustainable living in an interconnected world: A multilateral ecocentric approach. Journal of Business Ethics, 20(4), 273–288. CrossRef
Jackson, T. (2005). Motivating sustainable consumption. A review of evidence on consumer behaviour and behavioural change (pp. 1–153). A report to the Sustainable Development Research Network. Centre for Environmental Strategy Guildford, Surrey University of Surrey.
Jacoby, J. (1984). Perspectives on information. Journal of Consumer Research, 10(4), 432–435. CrossRef
Johar, G. V., Maheswaran, D., & Peracchio, L. A. (2006). Mapping the frontiers: Theoretical advances in consumer research on memory, effect, and persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, 33(1), 139–149. CrossRef
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. CrossRef
Lurie, N. H. (2004). Decision making in information-rich environments: The role of information structure. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(4), 473–486. CrossRef
Newholm, T. (2005). Case studying ethical consumers’ projects and strategies. In R. Harrison, T. Newholm, & D. Shaw (Eds.), The ethical consumer (pp. 107–124). London: Sage. CrossRef
Norwegian Ministry of Environment (1994). Report on the Symposium on Sustainable Consumption, 19–20 January, Oslo, Norway.
Olander, F., & Thøgersen, J. (1995). Understanding consumer behaviour as prerequisite for environmental protection. Journal of Consumer Policy, 18(4), 345–385. CrossRef
Patton, M. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Princen, T., Maniates, M., & Conca, K. (2002). Confronting consumption. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. CrossRef
Sanne, C. (2002). Willing consumers-or locked-in? Policies for a sustainable consumption. Ecological Economics, 42(1–2), 273–287. CrossRef
Schwartz, B. (2004). The paradox of choice. Why less is more. New York: HarperCollins.
Seyfang, G. (2009). Green shoots of sustainability. The 2009 UK transition movement survey [online]. Norwich: University of East Anglia. Retrieved February, 15, 2016, from http://transitionus.org/sites/default/files/SurveyofTransitionintheUKjuly09.pdf.
Shaw, D., & Clarke, I. (1999). Belief formation in ethical consumer groups: An exploratory study. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 17(2), 109–119. CrossRef
Shove, E. (2003). Converging conventions of comfort, cleanliness and convenience. Journal of Consumer Policy, 26(4), 395–418. CrossRef
Spiggle, S. (1994). Analysis and interpretation of qualitative data in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(3), 491–503. CrossRef
Szmigin, I., Carrigan, M., & McEachern, M. (2007). Flexibility, dissonance and the conscious consumer. In S. Borghini, M. A. McGrath, & C. Otnes (Eds.), European advances in consumer research (8) (pp. 379–380). Duluth, MN: Association for Consumer Research.
Thøgersen, J. (1994). A model of recycling behaviour, with evidence from Danish source separation programmes. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 11(1), 145–163. CrossRef
Thompson, C. J. (1997). Interpreting consumers: A hermeneutical framework for deriving marketing insights from the texts of consumers’ consumption stories. Journal of Marketing Research, 34(4), 438–455.
Thompson, C. J., & Hirschman, E. C. (1995). Understanding the socialized body: A poststructuralist analysis of consumers’ self-conceptions, body images, and self-care practices. Journal of Consumer Research, 22(2), 139–153. CrossRef
Thompson, C. J., Locander, W. B., & Pollio, H. R. (1989). Putting consumer experience back into consumer research: The philosophy and method of existential-phenomenology. Journal of Consumer Research, 16(2), 133–146. CrossRef
Thompson, C. J., Locander, W. B., & Pollio, H. R. (1990). The lived meaning of free choice: An existential-phenomenological description of everyday consumer experiences of contemporary married women. Journal of Consumer Research, 17(3), 346–361. CrossRef
Thompson, C. J., Pollio, H. R., & Locander, W. B. (1994). The spoken and the unspoken: A hermeneutic approach to understanding the cultural viewpoints that underlie consumer’s expressed meanings. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(2), 432–452. CrossRef
Wallendorf, M., & Belk, R. W. (1989). Assessing trustworthiness in naturalistic consumer research. In E. C. Hirschman (Ed.), Interpretive consumer research (pp. 69–84). Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.
White, R. W. (1971). The urge towards competence. The American Journal of Occupational Theory, 25(6), 271–274.
- “It’s Not Easy Living a Sustainable Lifestyle”: How Greater Knowledge Leads to Dilemmas, Tensions and Paralysis
- Springer Netherlands
Neuer Inhalt/© Stellmach, Neuer Inhalt/© Maturus, Pluta Logo/© Pluta