Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft
Erschienen in: Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft 2/2017

20.02.2017 | Aufsätze

Legitimation towards whom?

Managing the legitimacy crisis in Algeria during the Arab Uprisings

verfasst von: Dr. Maria Josua

Erschienen in: Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft | Ausgabe 2/2017

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This paper studies how strategies of legitimation are employed by ruling elites in authoritarian regimes and received by different addressees during a crisis of legitimacy. The Algerian case of authoritarian persistence in the Arab uprisings illustrates a conceptual framework that differentiates between addressees, types and modes of legitimation. The focus on societal target groups and their response is crucial for assessing the success or failure of regime strategies and reveals a dark side of legitimation in Algeria. The empirical study builds on qualitative fieldwork conducted in 2013. As many of the legitimation strategies failed, the legitimacy crisis in this case could not be solved. Few successful strategies contributed to the persistence of authoritarian rule.
Vorheriger Artikel Autokratische Regimelegitimation und soziale Entwicklung
Nächster Artikel Promising democracy, legitimizing autocracy? Perceptions of regime democraticness among university students in Morocco

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft

Die Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft. Comparative Governance and Politics (ZfVP) ist die erste deutschsprachige Zeitschrift für zentrale Themen und innovative Forschungsergebnisse aus dem Bereich der Vergleichenden Politikwissenschaft.

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Fußnoten
1
A regime comprises “the formal and informal organization of the center of political power, and of its relations with the broader society” (Fishman 1990, p. 428).
 
2
For such a disaggregation and the idea of legitimation failure see also Holbig and Gilley (2010, p. 399).
 
3
This perspective goes beyond Gerschewski’s claim that legitimation, co-optation and repression are pillars of stability in autocracies reinforcing each other (2013, p. 27). While he suggests possible conceptualizations of their relationship as “neutral, substitutive, conflictive, or complementary” (ibid.), complementarity is his basic assumption.
 
4
Most of them include the dimension of external legitimacy, which is not part of my definition because domestic addressees are the target group of relevance.
 
5
For the Arab world, Schlumberger (2010) stresses the importance of tradition and differentiates between religion and ideology, which I subsume under identity-related legitimation, plus he adds material legitimacy.
 
6
The suggested typology is closest to Pruzan-Jørgensen’s, but casts a wider net to cover empirics through preferring personal over charismatic legitimation and developing the broader identity-related legitimation.
 
7
While tradition could be subsumed under Easton’s definition of structural legitimacy, I prefer to stress the specific character of dynastic rule.
 
8
Traditional values embodied by ruling elites don’t necessarily correspond with values that prevail on the addressees’ side and vice versa, especially in heterogeneous societies. See Pickel and Stark (2010) for the relation between political culture and legitimacy in autocratic regimes.
 
9
Pickel (2010, p. 198) mentions ideology as a source of legitimacy that can comprise nationalism, equality, religion and shared norms.
 
10
Albrecht and Schlumberger call it “allocative power” (2004, p. 377).
 
11
Albrecht and Frankenberger see “merito-personal legitimacy” as a defining trait of authoritarian regimes (2010, pp. 57–58).
 
12
Oil products make up almost 40% of the GDP, 60% of budget revenues and more than 97% of exports (Dris-Ait Hamadouche and Dris 2012).
 
13
21.5% of men and 37.6% of women between 15–24 years were officially unemployed in 2010. All figures are taken from the ILOSTAT Database. http://​www.​ilo.​org/​ilostat. Accessed 02.05.14.
 
14
Cf. the Communiqué of the CNCD, which can be accessed on the Facebook site of the youth movement “Algérie Pacifique”. https://​www.​facebook.​com/​notes/​-alg%C3%A9rie-pacifique-le-collectif-citoyen/​communiqu%C3%A9-de-la-coordination-nationale-pour-le-changement-et-la-d%C3%A9mocratie/​178661528839849. Accessed 25.11.15.
 
15
Interviews A01, A13.
 
16
Interviews A02, A13.
 
17
Interview A08.
 
18
Interview A08.
 
19
Statement at press conference of civil society organizations, November 2013, Algiers.
 
20
Interview A07.
 
21
Interview A13.
 
22
Interviews A01, A04.
 
23
Interview A01.
 
24
Interviews A01, A06, A13.
 
25
Interview A09.
 
26
Already in 2002, Tessler found that only 48% of respondents in Algeria strongly agreed with the statement “Democracy may have problems but it’s better than any other form of government”, much less than in other Arab countries (2005, p. 199 ff.).
 
27
Interview A10.
 
28
Interview A14.
 
29
Interview A01.
 
Literatur
Alagappa, Muthiah. 1995. Contestation and crisis. In Political legitimacy in southeast Asia: the quest for moral authority, ed. Muthiah Alagappa, 54–65. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Albrecht, Holger, and Rolf Frankenberger. 2010. Autoritarismus Reloaded: Konzeptionelle Anmerkungen zur Vergleichenden Analyse politischer Systeme. In Autoritarismus Reloaded. Neuere Ansätze und Erkenntnisse der Autokratieforschung, ed. Holger Albrecht, Rolf Frankenberger, 37–60. Baden-Baden: Nomos.CrossRef
Albrecht, Holger, and Oliver Schlumberger. 2004. “Waiting for Godot”: regime change without democratization in the Middle East. International Political Science Review 25(4):371–392.CrossRef
Anderson, Benedict. 1983. Imagined communities. Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. London: Verso.
Bank, André. 2004. Rents, cooptation, and economized discourse: three dimensions of political rule in Jordan, Morocco and Syria. Journal of Mediterranean Studies 14(1/2):155–180.
Beetham, David. 1991. The legitimation of power. Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRef
Benford, Robert D., and David A. Snow. 2000. Framing processes and social movements: an overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology 26:611–639.CrossRef
Brady, Anne-Marie. 2009. Mass persuasion as a means of legitimation and China’s popular authoritarianism. American Behavioral Scientist 53(3):434–457.
Coleman, James. 1994. Foundations of social theory, 2nd edn., Cambridge: Belknap Press.
Collier, David. 2011. Understanding process tracing. Political Science & Politics 44(4):823–830.CrossRef
Dris-Aït Hamadouche, Louisa. 2012. Algeria in the face of the Arab spring: diffuse pressure and sustained resilience. IEMed Mediterranean Yearbook Med.2012., 161–166.
Easton, David. 1965. A systems analysis of political life. New York: Wiley.
Easton, David. 1975. A re-assessment of the concept of political support. British Journal of Political Science 5(4):435–457.CrossRef
Van Evera, Stephen. 1997. Guide to methods for students of political science. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Ezrow, Natasha M., and Erica Frantz. 2011. Dictators and Dictatorship. Understanding Authoritarian Regimes and Their Leaders. New York, London: Continuum.
Fishman, Robert M. 1990. Rethinking state and regime: southern Europe’s transition to democracy. World Politics 42(3):422–440.CrossRef
Flyvbjerg, Bent. 2006. Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry 12(2):219–245.CrossRef
Gerschewski, Johannes. 2013. The three pillars of stability: legitimation, repression, and co-optation in autocratic regimes. Democratization 20(1):13–36.CrossRef
Gilley, Bruce. 2009. The right to rule: how states win and lose legitimacy. New York: Columbia University Press.
Grauvogel, Julia, and Christian von Soest. 2015. How do non-democratic regimes claim legitimacy? Comparative insights from post-soviet countries. GIGA Working Paper No. 277. Hamburg: German Institute of Global and Area Studies..
von Haldenwang, Christian. 1999. Staatliches Handeln und politische Regulierung: Die Legitimität politischer Ordnungen im 21. Jahrhundert. Politische Vierteljahresschrift 40(3):365–389.
Hoffmann, Bert. 2015. The international dimension of authoritarian regime legitimation: insights from the Cuban case. Journal of International Relations and Development 18:556–574.CrossRef
Holbig, Heike. 2010. Die Globale Finanzkrise in China: Nationale und Internationale Dimensionen der Legitimität autoritärer Herrschaft. In Autoritarismus Reloaded. Neuere Ansätze und Erkenntnisse der Autokratieforschung, ed. Holger Albrecht, Rolf Frankenberger, 227–248. Baden-Baden: Nomos.CrossRef
Holbig, Heike, and Bruce Gilley. 2010. Reclaiming Legitimacy in China. Politics & Policy 38(3):395–422.CrossRef
International Monetary Fund. 2012. Algeria: 2011 article IV consultation – staff report; public information notice. IMF Country Report No. 12/20. Washington, D.C.: IMF.
International Monetary Fund. 2013. Algeria: 2012 article IV consultation – staff report; public information notice. IMF Country Report No. 13/47. Washington, D.C.: IMF.
International Monetary Fund. 2014. Algeria: 2013 article IV consultation. IMF Country Report No. 14/32. Washington, D.C.: IMF.
Josua, Maria. 2016. Co-optation reconsidered: authoritarian regime legitimation in the Jordanian ‘Arab Spring’. Middle East Law and Governance 8(1):32–56.CrossRef
Layachi, Azzedine. 2015. Morocco: keeping the revolution at bay with an enhanced status quo. In North African politics: change and continuity, ed. Yahia H. Zoubir, Gregory White, 210–224. London: Routledge.
Luciani, Giacomo. 1987. Allocation vs. production states: a theoretical framework. In The rentier state, ed. Hazem Beblawi, et al., 63–82. London: Croom Helm.
Mahfoud, Amara. 2012. Football sub-culture and youth politics in Algeria. Mediterranean Politics 17(1):41–58.CrossRef
Pickel, Gert. 2010. Staat, Bürger und politische Stabilität: Benötigen auch Autokratien politische Legitimität? In Autoritarismus Reloaded. Neuere Ansätze und Erkenntnisse der Autokratieforschung, ed. Holger Albrecht, Rolf Frankenberger, 179–200. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
Pickel, Susanne, and Toralf Stark. 2010. Politische Kultur(en) von Autokratien. In Autoritarismus Reloaded. Neuere Ansätze und Erkenntnisse der Autokratieforschung, ed. Holger Albrecht, Rolf Frankenberger, 201–225. Baden-Baden: Nomos.CrossRef
Pruzan-Jørgensen, Julie E. 2010. Analyzing authoritarian regime legitimation: findings from Morocco. Middle East Critique 19(3):269–286.CrossRef
Przeworski, Adam. 1991. Democracy and the market. Political and economic reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
République Algérienne Démocratique et Populaire. 2012. Loi n° 12-06 du 18 Safar 1433 correspondant au 12 janvier 2012 relative aux associations. Journal officiel de la République algérienne N° 02: 28-34.
Schlumberger, Oliver. 2008. Autoritarismus in der arabischen Welt. Ursachen, Trends und internationale Demokratieförderung. Baden-Baden: Nomos.CrossRef
Schlumberger, Oliver. 2010. Opening old bottles in search of new wine: studying nondemocratic legitimacy in the Middle East. Middle East Critique 19(3):233–250.
Schubert, Gunter, and Anna L. Ahlers. 2011. ‘Constructing a new socialist countryside’ and beyond: an analytical framework for studying policy implementation and political stability in contemporary China. Journal of Chinese Political Science 16:19–46.
Svolik, Milan. 2012. The politics of authoritarian rule. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Tessler, Mark. 2005. The view from the street: the attitudes and values of ordinary Algerians. In Islam, democracy and the state in Algeria. Lessons for the Western Mediterranean and beyond, ed. Michael Bonner, Megan Reif, et al., 184–201. London, New York: Routledge.
Volpi, Frédéric. 2006. Algeria’s pseudo-democratic politics: lessons for democratization in the Middle East. Democratization 13(3):442–455.CrossRef
Volpi, Frédéric. 2013. Algeria versus the Arab Spring. Journal of Democracy 24(3):104–115.CrossRef
Weber, Max. 1947. Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Tübingen: Mohr.
Werenfels, Isabelle. 2007. Managing instability in Algeria. Elites and political change since 1995. London: Routledge.
Werenfels, Isabelle. 2009. An equilibrium of instability: dynamics and reproduction mechanisms of Algeria’s political system. Confluences Méditerranée 71(4):179–194.CrossRef
Zoubir, Yahia. 2010. Algeria. In Politics and society in the contemporary Middle East, ed. Michele Penner Angrist, 177–202. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.
Zoubir, Yahia H., and Ahmed Aghrout. 2012. Algeria’s Path to Reform: Authentic Change? Middle East Policy 19(2):66–83.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Legitimation towards whom?
Managing the legitimacy crisis in Algeria during the Arab Uprisings
verfasst von
Dr. Maria Josua
Publikationsdatum
20.02.2017
Verlag
Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden
Erschienen in
Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft / Ausgabe 2/2017
Print ISSN: 1865-2646
Elektronische ISSN: 1865-2654
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12286-017-0331-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2017

Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft 2/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Aufsätze

Promising democracy, legitimizing autocracy? Perceptions of regime democraticness among university students in Morocco

Aufsätze

Autokratische Regimelegitimation und soziale Entwicklung

Fazit

Legitimationsstrategien von Autokratien. Befunde und Perspektiven der Forschung

Aufsätze

Legitimation autoritärer Regime durch Recht

Aufsätze

Legitimationsstrategien von Autokratien im Vergleich: Ergebnisse einer neuen Expertenumfrage

Aufsätze

Legitimation beyond ideology: authoritarian regimes and the construction of missions