Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
ATZ-Fachkongress

Chassis.tech plus 2024


4 Kongresse in einer Veranstaltung

Treffen Sie in München die Fachleute von Chassis, Lenkung, Bremsen sowie Reifen/Räder.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Universal Access in the Information Society
Erschienen in: Universal Access in the Information Society 2/2018

20.05.2017 | Communication

Accessibility evaluation of top university websites: a comparative study of Kyrgyzstan, Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan and Turkey

verfasst von: Rita Ismailova, Yavuz Inal

Erschienen in: Universal Access in the Information Society | Ausgabe 2/2018

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

It is important that university websites and services offered through their sites are used effectively, efficiently and satisfactorily by the whole target group of the university, including disabled users. However, universities in many countries are still unable to meet the criteria for web accessibility. This study aimed to test the websites of the top universities in Kyrgyzstan, Kazakhstan, Azerbaijan and Turkey using automated assessment tools. The results showed that university websites are more popular in Turkey, and in Turkish universities developers pay more attention to the performance of websites, followed by websites of Azerbaijani, Kyrgyz and Kazakh universities. The majority of the university websites in the study did not meet the WCAG 2.0 accessibility criteria. Only two Kyrgyz and two Kazakh university websites attained conformance level A, and only three, one Kyrgyz and two Kazakh, achieved accessibility conformance level AAA. Based on the results, it was determined that universities included in the present study need to devote more effort to making their websites more accessible for their users.
Vorheriger Artikel Mobile device accessibility for the visually impaired: problems mapping and recommendations

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Literatur
1.
2.
Ahmi, A., Mohamad, R.: Web accessibility of the Malaysian Public University websites. International Conference on E-Commerce (ICoEC), pp. 171–177, 20–22 Oct 2015, Sarawak, Malaysia (2015)
3.
Aizpurua, A., Arrue, M., Vigo, M.: Prejudices, memories, expectations and confidence influence experienced accessibility on the Web. Comput. Hum. Behav. 51, 152–160 (2015)CrossRef
4.
5.
6.
Aziz, M.A., Isa, W.A.R.W.M., Nordin, N.: Assessing the accessibility and usability of Malaysia higher education website. In: International Conference on User Science Engineering (i-USEr), pp. 203–208 (2010)
7.
Bradbard, D.A., Peters, C., Caneva, Y.: Web accessibility policies at land-grant universities. Int. Higher Educ. 13, 258–266 (2010)CrossRef
8.
9.
Doulani, A., Hariri, N., Rashidi, A.: Analysis of Iranian and British university websites by world wide web consortium. J. Scientometr. Res. 2, 74–79 (2013)CrossRef
10.
Espadinha, C., Pereira, L.M., Da Silva, F.M., Lopes, J.B.: Accessibility of Portuguese Public Universities’ sites. Disabil. Rehabil. 33(6), 475–485 (2011)CrossRef
11.
Fichten, C.S., Asuncion, J.V., Nguyen, M.N., Budd, J., Amsel, R.: The POSITIVES Scale: development and validation of a measure of how well the information and communication technology needs of students with disabilities are being met. J. Postsecond. Educ. Disabil. 23(2), 137–154 (2010)
12.
Floyd, K.S., Santiago, J.: The state of Website accessibility in higher education. In: Southern Association for Information Systems Conference (2007)
13.
Fuertes, J.L., Gutiérrez, E., Martínez, L.: Developing hera-ffx for WCAG 2.0. International Cross-Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility, p. 3. ACM (2011)
14.
Fuglerud, K., Røssvoll, T.: An evaluation of web-based voting usability and accessibility. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 11(4), 1–15 (2011)
15.
Gay, G., Li, C.Q.: AChecker: open, interactive, customizable, web accessibility checking. In: International Cross Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility (W4A), p. 23. ACM (2010)
16.
17.
Gopinath, S., Senthooran, V., Lojenaa, N., Kartheeswaran, T.: Usability and accessibility analysis of selected government websites in Sri Lanka. In Region 10 Symposium (TENSYMP), 2016 IEEE, pp. 394–398 (2016)
18.
Guner, H., Inal, Y. (2015). The effect of banner location on banner recognition in a Turkish government website: an eye tracking study. HCI International 2015, pp. 65–72, Los Angeles, USA
19.
Hashemian, B.J.: Analyzing web accessibility in Finnish higher education. ACM SIGACCESS Access. Comput. 101, 8–16 (2011)CrossRef
20.
Inal, Y., Ozen-Cinar, N., Cagiltay, K.: Kamu internet sitelerinde yer alan arama alanlarının kullanılabilirliği ve buna yönelik kullanıcı davranışlarının belirlenmesi. Bilişim Teknolojileri Dergisi 9(1), 41–54 (2016)
21.
Ismail, A., Kuppusamy, K.S.: Accessibility of Indian universities’ homepages: an exploratory study. J. King Saud Univ. Comput. Inf. Sci. (2016)
22.
Ismailova, R., Inal, Y.: Web site accessibility and quality in use: a comparative study of government Web sites in Kyrgyzstan, Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan and Turkey. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. (2016). doi:10.​1007/​s10209-016-0490-z
23.
24.
Jange, S.: Library websites of universities in Karnataka State: an evaluative study. J. Adv. Library Inf. Sci. 3(3), 195–202 (2014)
25.
Kane, S.K., Shulman, J.A., Shockley, T.J., Ladner, R.E.: A web accessibility report card for top international university Web sites. W4A2007, May 07–08, Banff, Canada (2007)
26.
Kaur, S., Kaur, K., Kaur, P.: An empirical performance evaluation of Universities Website. Int. J. Comput. Appl. 146(15), 10–16 (2016)MATH
27.
Kesswani, N., Kumar, S.: Accessibility analysis of websites of educational institutions. Perspect. Sci. 8, 210–212 (2016)CrossRef
28.
Korbel, D.M., Lucia, J.H., Wenzel, C.M., Anderson, B.G.: Collaboration strategies to facilitate successful transition of students with disabilities in a changing higher education environment. New Dir. Higher Educ. 154, 17–25 (2011)CrossRef
29.
Kurt, S.: The accessibility of university web sites: the case of Turkish universities. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 10(1), 101–110 (2011)CrossRef
30.
31.
Maisak, R., Brown, J.: Web accessibility on Thai higher education Websites. In: ICSEA 2014: The Ninth International Conference on Software Engineering Advances, pp. 645–650 (2014)
32.
Menascé, D.A.: Load testing of web sites. IEEE Internet Comput. 6(4), 70–74 (2002)CrossRef
33.
Mirri, S., Muratori, L.A., Salomoni, P.: Monitoring accessibility: large scale evaluations at a geo political level. In: 13th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility, pp. 163–170. ACM (2011)
34.
Okada, H., Arakawa, H., Kondo, T.: Comparison of web accessibility within Japanese educational institution websites. In: ICROS-SICE International Joint Conference, Aug 18–21, Fukuoka International Congress Center, Japan (2009)
35.
36.
Rowland, C., Whiting, J., Smith, J.: What do you need to create and maintain web accessibility? In: Accessible Instructional Design. Published online: 04 Dec 2015, pp. 13–45 (2015)
37.
38.
Solovieva, T.I., Bock, J.M.: Monitoring for accessibility and university Websites: Meeting the needs of people with disabilities. J. Postsecond. Educ. Disabil. 27(2), 113–127 (2014)
39.
Speicher, M., Both, A., Gaedke, M.: Ensuring web interface quality through usability-based split testing. In: S. Casteleyn, G. Rossi, M. Winckler (eds) International Conference on Web Engineering, Vol. 8541, pp. 93–110. LNCS, Springer (2014)
40.
41.
42.
43.
Youngblood, N.E.: Revisiting Alabama state website accessibility. Gov. Inf. Quart. 31(3), 476–487 (2014)CrossRef
44.
Zaphiris, P., Ellis, R.D.: Website usability and content accessibility of the top USA universities. WebNet Conference, Orlando, FL, USA (2001)
Metadaten
Titel
Accessibility evaluation of top university websites: a comparative study of Kyrgyzstan, Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan and Turkey
verfasst von
Rita Ismailova
Yavuz Inal
Publikationsdatum
20.05.2017
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Universal Access in the Information Society / Ausgabe 2/2018
Print ISSN: 1615-5289
Elektronische ISSN: 1615-5297
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-017-0541-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2018

Universal Access in the Information Society 2/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Review Paper

Information technology adoption: a review of the literature and classification

Position Paper

Improving the information society skills: Is knowledge accessible for all?

Long Paper

Mobile device accessibility for the visually impaired: problems mapping and recommendations

Long Paper

Interactivity and multimodality in language learning: the untapped potential of audiobooks

Long Paper

Accessibility and tangible interaction in distributed workspaces based on multi-touch surfaces

Editorial

Information society skills: Is knowledge accessible for all? Part I

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise