Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Journal of Technology and Design Education 3/2018

03.06.2017

If you build it, will they come? Student preferences for Makerspace environments in higher education

verfasst von: Morgan M. Hynes, Wendy J. Hynes

Erschienen in: International Journal of Technology and Design Education | Ausgabe 3/2018

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The Maker Movement inspires people to express their creativity by making things in a self-directed and, often, collaborative learning endeavor. The excitement of the movement has spurred the development of various types of Makerspaces across the United States and the World to further enable people to make and innovate. The education community has recognized the potential for Makerspaces as learning environments that can foster interdisciplinary collaboration and self-directed learning. As such, there is much excitement to create Makerspaces within K-12 schools, libraries, colleges and universities. However, contrary to the formal design process used to build many school facilities, successful grass-roots makerspaces are most often created when those with like-minded interests come together and adapt the building around them to fit their needs. The research in this paper focuses on the design of such spaces by applying the environmental preferences predictors psychology construct. The study surveyed 276 students from art and design, engineering, and liberal arts majors to better understand their preferences as related to images of eight different Makerspaces. The results are broken down by the four predictors of preference, major, and gender. The results highlight differences among the images along with design considerations for creating spaces that welcome a broader audience.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Baichtal, J. (2014). Maker pro: Essays on making a living as a maker. San Francisco, CA: Maker Media Inc. Baichtal, J. (2014). Maker pro: Essays on making a living as a maker. San Francisco, CA: Maker Media Inc.
Zurück zum Zitat Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company.
Zurück zum Zitat Barrett, T., Pizzico, M., Levy, B. D., Nagel, R. L., Linsey, J. S., Talley, K. G., Forest, C. R., & Newstetter, W. C. (2015). A review of university maker spaces. In Proceedings of annual conference of American Society of Engineering Education. Seattle, WA. Barrett, T., Pizzico, M., Levy, B. D., Nagel, R. L., Linsey, J. S., Talley, K. G., Forest, C. R., & Newstetter, W. C. (2015). A review of university maker spaces. In Proceedings of annual conference of American Society of Engineering Education. Seattle, WA.
Zurück zum Zitat Bettman, J. R., Luce, M. F., & Payne, J. W. (2008). Preference construction and preference stability: Putting the pillow to rest. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 18(3), 170–174.CrossRef Bettman, J. R., Luce, M. F., & Payne, J. W. (2008). Preference construction and preference stability: Putting the pillow to rest. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 18(3), 170–174.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Brandt, C. B., Cennamo, K., Douglas, S., Vernon, M., McGrath, M., & Reimer, Y. (2013). A theoretical framework for the studio as a learning environment. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23(2), 329–348.CrossRef Brandt, C. B., Cennamo, K., Douglas, S., Vernon, M., McGrath, M., & Reimer, Y. (2013). A theoretical framework for the studio as a learning environment. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23(2), 329–348.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Crowther, P. (2013). Understanding the signature pedagogy of the design studio and the opportunities for its technological enhancement. Journal of Learning Design, 6(3), 18–28.CrossRef Crowther, P. (2013). Understanding the signature pedagogy of the design studio and the opportunities for its technological enhancement. Journal of Learning Design, 6(3), 18–28.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Day, L. L. (1992). Placemaking by design: Fitting a large new building into a historic district. Environment and Behavior, 24(3), 326–346.CrossRef Day, L. L. (1992). Placemaking by design: Fitting a large new building into a historic district. Environment and Behavior, 24(3), 326–346.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Doorley, S., & Witthoft, S. (2012). Make space: How to set the stage for creative collaboration. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. Doorley, S., & Witthoft, S. (2012). Make space: How to set the stage for creative collaboration. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Zurück zum Zitat Dougherty, D. (2013). The maker mindset. In M. Honey & D. E Kanter (Eds.), Design, make, play: Growing the next generation of STEM innovators (pp. 7–11). New York, NY: Routledge. Dougherty, D. (2013). The maker mindset. In M. Honey & D. E Kanter (Eds.), Design, make, play: Growing the next generation of STEM innovators (pp. 7–11). New York, NY: Routledge.
Zurück zum Zitat Dym, C. L., Agogino, A. M., Eris, O., Frey, D. D., & Leifer, L. J. (2005). Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 103–120.CrossRef Dym, C. L., Agogino, A. M., Eris, O., Frey, D. D., & Leifer, L. J. (2005). Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 103–120.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Espey, M. (2008). Does space matter? Classroom design and team-based learning. Review of Agricultural Economics, 30(4), 764–775.CrossRef Espey, M. (2008). Does space matter? Classroom design and team-based learning. Review of Agricultural Economics, 30(4), 764–775.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Feldman, J. M., & Lynch, J. G. (1988). Self-generated validity and other effects of measurement on belief, attitude, intention, and behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73(3), 421.CrossRef Feldman, J. M., & Lynch, J. G. (1988). Self-generated validity and other effects of measurement on belief, attitude, intention, and behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73(3), 421.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Goodsell, C. T. (2003). The concept of public space and its democratic manifestations. The American Review of Public Administration, 33(4), 361–383.CrossRef Goodsell, C. T. (2003). The concept of public space and its democratic manifestations. The American Review of Public Administration, 33(4), 361–383.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hadim, H. A. & Esche, S. K. (2002). Enhancing the engineering curriculum through project-based learning. In Frontiers in education, 2002. FIE 2002. 32nd Annual. IEEE. Hadim, H. A. & Esche, S. K. (2002). Enhancing the engineering curriculum through project-based learning. In Frontiers in education, 2002. FIE 2002. 32nd Annual. IEEE.
Zurück zum Zitat Hatch, M. (2013). The maker movement manifesto: rules for innovation in the new world of crafters, hackers, and tinkerers. New York: McGraw Hill Professional. Hatch, M. (2013). The maker movement manifesto: rules for innovation in the new world of crafters, hackers, and tinkerers. New York: McGraw Hill Professional.
Zurück zum Zitat Herzog, T. R., Gray, L. E., Dunville, A. M., Hicks, A. M., & Gilson, E. A. (2011). Preference and tranquility for houses of worship. Environment and Behavior, 45(4), 504–525.CrossRef Herzog, T. R., Gray, L. E., Dunville, A. M., Hicks, A. M., & Gilson, E. A. (2011). Preference and tranquility for houses of worship. Environment and Behavior, 45(4), 504–525.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Herzog, T. R., Gray, L. E., Dunville, A. M., Hicks, A. M., & Gilson, E. A. (2013). Preference and tranquility for houses of worship. Environment and Behavior, 45(4), 504–525.CrossRef Herzog, T. R., Gray, L. E., Dunville, A. M., Hicks, A. M., & Gilson, E. A. (2013). Preference and tranquility for houses of worship. Environment and Behavior, 45(4), 504–525.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Herzog, T. R., & Shier, R. L. (2000). Complexity, age, and building preference. Environment and Behavior, 32(4), 557–575.CrossRef Herzog, T. R., & Shier, R. L. (2000). Complexity, age, and building preference. Environment and Behavior, 32(4), 557–575.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hlubinka, M., Dougherty, D., Thomas, P., Chang, S., Hoefer, S., Alexander, I., et al. (2013). Makerspace playbook: School edition. San Francisco, CA: Maker Media. Hlubinka, M., Dougherty, D., Thomas, P., Chang, S., Hoefer, S., Alexander, I., et al. (2013). Makerspace playbook: School edition. San Francisco, CA: Maker Media.
Zurück zum Zitat Ikemi, M. (2005). The effects of mystery on preference for residential facades. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25(2), 167–173.CrossRef Ikemi, M. (2005). The effects of mystery on preference for residential facades. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25(2), 167–173.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kaplan, S. (1987). Aesthetics, affect, and cognition: Environmental preference from an evolution perspective. Environment and Behavior, 19(1), 3–32.CrossRef Kaplan, S. (1987). Aesthetics, affect, and cognition: Environmental preference from an evolution perspective. Environment and Behavior, 19(1), 3–32.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kent, R. L. (1989). The role of mystery in preferences for shopping malls. Landscape Journal, 8(1), 28–35.CrossRef Kent, R. L. (1989). The role of mystery in preferences for shopping malls. Landscape Journal, 8(1), 28–35.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Knight, D. W., Carlson, L. E., & Sullivan, J. (2007). Improving engineering student retention through hands-on, team based, first-year design projects. In Proceedings of the international conference on research in engineering education. Honolulu, HI. Knight, D. W., Carlson, L. E., & Sullivan, J. (2007). Improving engineering student retention through hands-on, team based, first-year design projects. In Proceedings of the international conference on research in engineering education. Honolulu, HI.
Zurück zum Zitat Marra, R. M., Palmer, B., & Litzinger, T. A. (2000). The effects of a first-year engineering design course on student intellectual development as measured by the perry scheme. Journal of Engineering Education, 89(1), 39–45.CrossRef Marra, R. M., Palmer, B., & Litzinger, T. A. (2000). The effects of a first-year engineering design course on student intellectual development as measured by the perry scheme. Journal of Engineering Education, 89(1), 39–45.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Martinez, S., & Stager, G. (2013). Invent to learn: Making, tinkering, and engineering in the classroom. Torrance: Constructing modern knowledge press. Martinez, S., & Stager, G. (2013). Invent to learn: Making, tinkering, and engineering in the classroom. Torrance: Constructing modern knowledge press.
Zurück zum Zitat McCoy, J. M., & Evans, G. W. (2002). The potential role of the physical environment in fostering creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 14(3–4), 409–426.CrossRef McCoy, J. M., & Evans, G. W. (2002). The potential role of the physical environment in fostering creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 14(3–4), 409–426.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., Schkade, D. A., Schwarz, N., & Gregory, R. (1999). Measuring constructed preferences: Towards a building code. In B. Fischhoff & C. F. Manski (Eds.), Elicitation of preferences (pp. 243–275). Dordrecht: Springer. Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., Schkade, D. A., Schwarz, N., & Gregory, R. (1999). Measuring constructed preferences: Towards a building code. In B. Fischhoff & C. F. Manski (Eds.), Elicitation of preferences (pp. 243–275). Dordrecht: Springer.
Zurück zum Zitat Peppler, K., & Bender, S. (2013). Maker movement spreads innovation one project at a time. Phi Delta Kappan, 95(3), 22–27.CrossRef Peppler, K., & Bender, S. (2013). Maker movement spreads innovation one project at a time. Phi Delta Kappan, 95(3), 22–27.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rands, M. L., & Gansemer-Topf, A. M. (2017). The room itself is active: How classroom design impacts student engagement. Journal of Learning Spaces, 6(1), 26–33. Rands, M. L., & Gansemer-Topf, A. M. (2017). The room itself is active: How classroom design impacts student engagement. Journal of Learning Spaces, 6(1), 26–33.
Zurück zum Zitat Scott, S. C. (1993a). Complexity and mystery as predictors of interior preferences. Journal of Interior Design, 19(1), 25–33.CrossRef Scott, S. C. (1993a). Complexity and mystery as predictors of interior preferences. Journal of Interior Design, 19(1), 25–33.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Scott, S. C. (1993b). Visual attributes related to preference in interior environments. Journal of Interior Design, 18(1–2), 7–16.CrossRef Scott, S. C. (1993b). Visual attributes related to preference in interior environments. Journal of Interior Design, 18(1–2), 7–16.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Self, J. A., & Baek, J. S. (2016). Interdisciplinarity in design education: Understanding the undergraduate student experience. International Journal of Technology and Design Education. doi:10.1007/s10798-016-9355-2. Self, J. A., & Baek, J. S. (2016). Interdisciplinarity in design education: Understanding the undergraduate student experience. International Journal of Technology and Design Education. doi:10.​1007/​s10798-016-9355-2.
Zurück zum Zitat Simonson, I. (2008). Regarding inherent preferences. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 18(3), 191–196.CrossRef Simonson, I. (2008). Regarding inherent preferences. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 18(3), 191–196.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Slovic, P. (1995). The construction of preference. American Psychologist, 50(5), 364.CrossRef Slovic, P. (1995). The construction of preference. American Psychologist, 50(5), 364.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Van der Jagt, A. P., Craig, T., Anable, J., Brewer, M. J., & Pearson, D. G. (2014). Unearthing the picturesque: The validity of the preference matrix as a measure of landscape aesthetics. Landscape and Urban Planning, 124, 1–13.CrossRef Van der Jagt, A. P., Craig, T., Anable, J., Brewer, M. J., & Pearson, D. G. (2014). Unearthing the picturesque: The validity of the preference matrix as a measure of landscape aesthetics. Landscape and Urban Planning, 124, 1–13.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Zavotka, S. L. (1995). Characteristics that influence individuals’ preferences for levels of complexity in interior design furnishings. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, 23(4), 393–408.CrossRef Zavotka, S. L. (1995). Characteristics that influence individuals’ preferences for levels of complexity in interior design furnishings. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, 23(4), 393–408.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Zube, E. H., Simcox, D. E., & Law, C. S. (1987). Perceptual landscape simulations: History and prospect. Landscape Journal, 6(1), 62–80.CrossRef Zube, E. H., Simcox, D. E., & Law, C. S. (1987). Perceptual landscape simulations: History and prospect. Landscape Journal, 6(1), 62–80.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
If you build it, will they come? Student preferences for Makerspace environments in higher education
verfasst von
Morgan M. Hynes
Wendy J. Hynes
Publikationsdatum
03.06.2017
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
International Journal of Technology and Design Education / Ausgabe 3/2018
Print ISSN: 0957-7572
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-1804
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-017-9412-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2018

International Journal of Technology and Design Education 3/2018 Zur Ausgabe

    Premium Partner