nach oben

Journal of Business and Psychology

Erschienen in:

23.06.2016 | Original Paper

Situating Ethical Behavior in the Nomological Network of Job Performance

verfasst von: Teresa L. Russell, Taylor E. Sparks, John P. Campbell, Kristina Handy, Peter Ramsberger, James A. Grand

Erschienen in: Journal of Business and Psychology | Ausgabe 3/2017

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Purpose

Our objective was to generate, define, and evaluate behavioral dimensions of ethical performance at work that are common across United States occupations.

Design/Methodology/Approach

This project involved three studies. Study 1 involved (a) qualitative review of published literature, professional codes of ethics, and critical incidents of (un)ethical performance and resulted in (b) behavioral dimensions and ethical performance rating scales. The second and third studies used a retranslation methodology to evaluate the ethical performance dimensions from Study 1. The behavioral dimensions were linked to the performance determinants (personal attributes) in Study 3.

Findings

Study 1 resulted in draft dimension definitions and rating scales for 10 ethical performance dimensions. In Studies 2 and 3, retranslation data provided strong support for 10 behavioral dimensions of ethical performance at work. Results from Study 3 shed light on possible relationships among the performance dimensions based on their underlying performance determinants.

Implications

Communicating an organization’s ethical standards to employees is important because some ethical breakdowns can be attributed to simply failing to recognize an ethical matter (in: DeCremer, Managerial ethics: Managing the psychology of morality, Routledge, New York, 2011). Definitions of ethical behavior in the workplace provide a tool for researchers, employers, and employees to communicate about ethical situations and a foundation for folding ethics into employee training and performance management.

Originality/Value

These studies provide a taxonomy of ethical performance at work that generalizes to a diverse array of occupations and industries, and dimensions and rating scales have value for performance management, training/curriculum development, job analysis, predictor development and/or validation, and additional research.

Vorheriger Artikel Exploring the Effects of Job Autonomy on Engagement and Creativity: The Moderating Role of Performance Pressure and Learning Goal Orientation

Nächster Artikel Work Ethic and Work Outcomes in an Expanded Criterion Domain

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

We reviewed articles from the following journals: Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality Assurance, and American Psychologist; Business Ethics: A European Review, Business Ethics Quarterly, Canadian Psychology, Ethics & Behavior, European Journal of Personality, Group & Organizational Management, Journal of Applied Communication Research, Journal of Educational Psychology, Journal of Management, Journal of Organizational Behavior, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Journal of Personnel Psychology, Leadership Quarterly, Medical Teacher, Organizational Dynamics, Organization Science, Personality and Individual Differences, and Western Journal of Nursing Research.

Alexander, C. S., & Becker, H. J. (1978). The use of vignettes in survey research. Public Opinion Quarterly, 42, 93–104.CrossRef

Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. M. (1993). Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance (p. 71). Personnel Selection in Organizations; San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Broome, M. E., Pryor, E., Habermann, B., Pulley, L., & Kincaid, H. (2005). The Scientific Misconduct Questionnaire—Revised (SMQ-R): Validation and psychometric testing. Accountability in Research, 12, 263–280.CrossRefPubMed

Brown, M. E., & Treviño, L. K. (2006). Ethical leadership: A review and future directions. The Leadership Quarterly, 17, 595–616.CrossRef

Brown, M. E., Treviño, L. K., & Harrison, D. A. (2005). Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97, 117–134.CrossRef

Campbell, J. P. (2012). Behavior, performance, and effectiveness in the 21st century. In S. Kozlowski (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of organizational psychology (Vol. 1). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Campbell, J. P., McCloy, R. A., Oppler, S. H., & Sager, C. E. (1993). A theory of performance. In N. Schmitt & W. Borman (Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations (pp. 35–70). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Campbell, J. P., & Wiernik, B. (2015). The modeling and assessment of performance at work. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2, 47–74.CrossRef

Collins, D. (2000). The quest to improve the human condition: The first 1,500 articles published in Journal of business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 26, 1–73.CrossRef

Colquitt, J. A. (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 386–400.CrossRefPubMed

DeCremer, D. (2011). On the psychology of dealing with ethical failures: A behavioral ethics approach. In M. Schminke (Ed.), Managerial ethics: Managing the psychology of morality. New York: Routledge.

Ethics Resource Center. (2014). National Business Ethics Survey ^® of the U.S. workforce. Arlington, VA: Author.

Fiedler, F. E., Mitchell, T., & Triandis, H. C. (1972). The culture assimilator: An approach to cross-cultural training, 55, 95–102.

Flanagan, J. C. (1954). The critical incident technique. Psychological Bulletin, 51, 327–358.CrossRefPubMed

Foldes, H. L. J. (2006). Ethical Misconduct of Senior Leaders: Counterproductive Work Behaviors at the Top (Doctoral Dissertation). University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.

Gatewood, R. D., & Carroll, A. B. (1991). Assessment of ethical performance of organization members: A conceptual framework. Academy of Management Review, 16, 667–690.

Gaumnitz, B. R., & Lere, J. C. (2002). Contents of codes of ethics of professional business organizations in the United States. Journal of Business Ethics, 35, 35–49.CrossRef

Helton-Fauth, W., Gaddis, B., Scott, G., Mumford, M., Devenport, L., Connelly, S., & Brown, R. (2003). A new approach to assessing ethical conduct in the scientific work. Accountability in Research, 10, 205–228.CrossRefPubMed

Kaptein, M. (2008). Developing a measure of unethical behavior in the workplace: A stakeholder perspective. Journal of Management, 34(5), 978–1008.CrossRef

Kaptein, M. (2010). The ethics of organizations: A longitudinal Study of the U.S. working population. Journal of Business Ethics, 92, 601–608.CrossRef

Keith, N. K., Pettijohn, C. E., & Burnett, M. S. (2003). An empirical evaluation of the effect of peer and managerial ethical behaviors and the ethical predispositions of prospective advertising employees. Journal of Business Ethics, 48, 251–265.CrossRef

Kellerman, B. (2004). Bad leadership: What it is, how it happens, why it matters. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

Khuntia, R., & Suar, D. (2004). A scale to assess ethical leadership of Indian private and public sector managers. Journal of Business Ethics, 49, 13–26.CrossRef

Kish-Gephart, J. J., Harrison, D. A., & Treviño, L. K. (2010). Bad apples, bad cases, and bad barrels: Meta-analytic evidence about sources of unethical decisions at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 1–31.CrossRefPubMed

Kohlberg, L. (1969). Stage and sequence. The cognitive-developmental approach to socialization. In D. A. Goslin (Ed.), Handbook of socialization theory and research. Chicago: Rand McNally.

Lipman-Blumen, J. (2004). The allure of toxic leaders: Why we follow destructive bosses and corrupt politicians—And how we can survive them. New York: Oxford University Press.

Mallard, G. C., & Lance, C. E. (1998). Development and evaluation of a parent-employee interrole conflict scale. Social Indicators Research, 45, 343–370.CrossRef

Martin, K. D., & Cullen, J. B. (2006). Continuities and extensions of ethical climate theory: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Business Ethics, 69, 175–194.CrossRef

Mayer, D. M. (2014). A review of the literature on ethical climate and culture. In B. Schneider & K. M. Barbera (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of organizational climate and culture (pp. 415–440). New York: Oxford University Press.

Mesmer-Magnus, J. R., & Viswesvaran, C. (2005). Whistleblowing in organizations: An examination of correlates of whistleblowing intentions, actions, and retaliation. Journal of Business Ethics, 62, 277–297.CrossRef

O’Fallon, M. J., & Butterfield, K. D. (2005). A review of the empirical ethical decision-making literature: 1996–2003. Journal of Business Ethics, 59, 375–413.CrossRef

Pan, Y., & Sparks, J. R. (2012). Predictors, consequence, and measurement of ethical judgments: Review and meta-analysis. Journal of Business Research, 65, 84–91.CrossRef

Peterson, D. K. (2002). The relationship between unethical behavior and the dimensions of the ethical climate questionnaire. Journal of Business Ethics, 41, 313–326.CrossRef

Rest, J. (1986). Moral development: Advances in research and theory. New York: Prager.

Schubert, S., Ortwein, H., Dumitsch, A., Schwantes, U., Wilhelm, O., & Kiessling, C. (2008). A situational judgment test of professional behavior: Development and validation. Medical Teacher, 30, 528–533.CrossRefPubMed

Smith, P. C., & Kendall, L. M. (1963). Retranslation of expectations: An approach to the construction of unambiguous anchors for rating scales. Journal of Applied Psychology, 47, 149–155.CrossRef

Spector, P. E., & Fox, S. (2010). Counterproductive work behavior and organisational citizenship behavior: Are they opposite forms of active behavior? Applied Psychology: An International Review, 59(1), 21–39.CrossRef

Spector, P. E., Fox, S., Penney, L. M., Bruursema, K., Goh, A., & Kessler, S. (2006). The dimensionality of counterproductivity: Are all counterproductive behaviors created equal? Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68(3), 446–460.CrossRef

Stark, S., Chernyshenko, O., Drasgow, F., & Williams, B. (2006). Examining assumptions about item responding in personality assessment: should ideal point methods be considered for scale development and scoring? Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 25–39.CrossRefPubMed

Stevens, B. (2001). Hospitality ethics: Responses from human resource directors and students to seven ethical scenarios. Journal of Business Ethics, 30, 233–242.CrossRef

Tenbrunsel, A. E., & Smith-Crowe, K. (2008). Ethical decision making: Where we’ve been and where we’re going. Academy Management Annals, 2, 545–607.CrossRef

Treviño, L. K., den Nieuwenboer, N. A., & Kish-Gephart, J. J. (2014). (Un) Ethical behavior in organizations. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 635–660.CrossRefPubMed

Treviño, L. K., Weaver, G. R., & Reynolds, S. J. (2006). Behavioral ethics in organizations: A review. Journal of Management, 32, 951–990.CrossRef

Vardi, Y. (2001). The effects of organizational and ethical climates on misconduct at work. Journal of Business Ethics, 29, 325–337.CrossRef

Vitell, S. J., Dickerson, E. B., & Festervand, T. A. (2000). Ethical problems, conflicts and beliefs of small business professionals. Journal of Business Ethics, 28, 15–24.CrossRef

Titel: Situating Ethical Behavior in the Nomological Network of Job Performance
verfasst von: Teresa L. Russell
Taylor E. Sparks
John P. Campbell
Kristina Handy
Peter Ramsberger
James A. Grand
Publikationsdatum: 23.06.2016
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Journal of Business and Psychology / Ausgabe 3/2017
Print ISSN: 0889-3268
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-353X
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-016-9454-9

Springer Professional

Abstract

Purpose

Design/Methodology/Approach

Findings

Implications

Originality/Value

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2017

Infusing Twenty-First-Century Skills into Engineering Education

Generational Differences in Work Ethic: Fact or Fiction?

The Latent Change Score Model: A More Flexible Approach to Modeling Time in Self-Regulated Learning

Exploring the Effects of Job Autonomy on Engagement and Creativity: The Moderating Role of Performance Pressure and Learning Goal Orientation

The Knowledge, Skills, Abilities, and Other Characteristics Required for Face-to-Face Versus Computer-Mediated Communication: Similar or Distinct Constructs?

Work Ethic and Work Outcomes in an Expanded Criterion Domain

Premium Partner