nach oben

Learning Environments Research

Erschienen in:

30.10.2019 | Original Paper

Perceived service quality factors in online higher education

verfasst von: Daniel La Rotta, Olga Cecilia Usuga, Valentina Clavijo

Erschienen in: Learning Environments Research | Ausgabe 2/2020

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

In recent years, the offer of higher-education programs under online modality has grown significantly. This situation has generated the need to evaluate the quality of these services, whose conditions and characteristics do not correspond to those of the traditional face-to-face modality. This article identifies and describes factors underlying the quality of the service perceived by students enrolled in an online higher-education program. Based on a literature review and a field work with students, an information-gathering instrument was developed using a qualitative phase. Next, field work involved collecting data from 120 students enrolled at a public university in Colombia (South America). Data were analysed through exploratory factor analysis using unweighted least squares extraction and Varimax rotation. Five factors explaining 60.335% of the total variance were identified: (1) Teachers, (2) Support academic resources, (3) Administrative support, (4) User interface and (5) Course enrollment. Further research is recommended to understand possible specificities in other online settings.

Vorheriger Artikel Facebook class groups of high school students: their role in establishing social dynamics and learning experiences

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Abdullah, F. (2006). The development of HEdPERF: A new measuring instrument of service quality for the higher education sector. International Journal of Consumer Studies,30(6), 569–581. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2005.00480.x.CrossRef

Adams, S., Cummins, M., Davis, A., Freeman, A., Ananthanarayanan, V., Hall-Giesinger, C. (2017). Horizon Report 2017 Higher Education Edition. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejoc.201200111 CrossRef

Ali, M., Hishamuddin, N., Tahir, L., & Said, M. (2016). Reinforcing teacher’s role in retaining students’ interests in discussing online in their learning process at Malaysian tertiary institutions. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology,93(2), 323–331.

Ally, M., & Prieto, J. (2014). What is the future of mobile learning in education? Revista de Universidad y Sociedad Del Conocimiento (RUSC),11(1), 142–151.CrossRef

Annamdevula, S., & Bellamkonda, R. S. (2012). Development of HiEdQUAL for measuring service quality in Indian higher education sector. International Journal of Innovation Management and Technology,3(4), 412–416. https://doi.org/10.7763/IJIMT.2012.V3.265.CrossRef

Arizabaleta, S., & Ochoa, A. F. (2016). Hacia una educación superior inclusiva en Colombia. Pedagogía y Saberes, (45), 41–52. Retrieved from http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0121-24942016000200005&lang=pt

Babakus, E., & Boller, G. W. (1992). An empirical assessment of the SERVQUAL scale. Journal of Business Research,24(3), 253–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-2963(92)90022-4.CrossRef

Camisón, C., Cruz, S., & González, T. (2007). Gestión de la calidad: Conceptos, enfoques, modelos y sistemas. Madrid: Pearson Prentice Hall. ISBN 10: 84-205-4262-8. ISBN 13: 978-84-205-4262-1.

Carman, J. M. (1990). Consumer perceptions of service quality: An assessment of the SERVQUAL dimensions. Journal of Retailing,66(1), 33. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(99)00084-3.CrossRef

Chiroleu, A. (2012). Políticas de Educación Superior en América Latina en el Siglo XXI: ¿Inclusión o Calidad? Archivos Analíticos de Políticas Educativas, 20(13), 1–21.CrossRef

Cronin, J. J., & Taylor, S. A. (1992). Measuring quality: A reexamination. Journal of Marketing,56(3), 55–68. https://doi.org/10.2307/1252296.CrossRef

Estévez, J. A., Castro, J., & Granobles, H. R. (2015). La educación virtual en Colombia: Exposición de modelos de deserción. Apertura: Revista de Innovación Educativa, 7(1). Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ehh&AN=102888761&lang=es&site=ehost-live

Fernandez, M. D., Ferrer, R., Reig, A., Albaladejo, N., & Walker, S. L. (2015). Validation of a Spanish version of the distance education learning environment survey. Learning Environments Research,18, 179–196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-015-9179-0.CrossRef

Ferreyra, M. M., Avitabile, C., Botero, J., Haimovich, F., & Urzúa, S. (2017). Momento decisivo: La educación superior en América Latina y el Caribe. Washington, DC: Banco Mundial.

Flora, D. B., LaBrish, C., & Chalmers, R. P. (2012). Old and new ideas for data screening and assumption testing for exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Frontiers in Psychology,3(March), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00055.CrossRef

Galeeva, R. B. (2016). SERVQUAL application and adaptation for educational service quality assessments in Russian higher education. Quality Assurance in Education,24(3), 329–348. https://doi.org/10.1108/QAE-06-2015-0024.CrossRef

Grönroos, C. (1984). A service quality model and its marketing implications. European Journal of Marketing,18(4), 36–44. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000004784.CrossRef

Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., & Anderson, R. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.

Hayes, B. (2002). Measuring customer satisfaction. (S. Ediciones Gestión 2000, Ed.) (2002nd ed.). Barcelona.

Icli, G. E., & Anil, N. K. (2014). The HEDQUAL scale: A new measurement scale of service quality for MBA programs in higher education. South African Journal of Business Management,45(3), 31–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/02572117.1984.10586532.CrossRef

Islam, N., Beer, M., & Slack, F. (2015). E-learning challenges faced by academics in higher education: A literature review. Journal of Education and Training Studies,3(5), 102–112. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v3i5.947.CrossRef

Kashif, M., Ramayah, T., & Sarifuddin, S. (2014). PAKSERV—Measuring higher education service quality in a collectivist cultural context. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence,27(3–4), 265–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2014.976939.CrossRef

Ladhari, R. (2008). Alternative measures of service quality: A review. Managing Service Quality: An International Journal,18(1), 65–86. https://doi.org/10.1108/09604520810842849.CrossRef

Ladhari, R. (2009). A review of twenty years of SERVQUAL research. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences,1(2), 172–198. https://doi.org/10.1108/17566690910971445.CrossRef

Latif, K. F., Latif, I., Farooq Sahibzada, U., & Ullah, M. (2017). In search of quality: Measuring higher education service quality (HiEduQual). Total Quality Management and Business Excellence,3363(June), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2017.1338133.CrossRef

Lee, Y., Choi, J., & Kim, T. (2013). Discriminating factors between completers of and dropouts from online learning courses. British Journal of Educational Technology,44(2), 328–337. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01306.x.CrossRef

Lewis, R. C. & Booms, B. H. 1983. The marketing aspects of service quality. In L. Berry, G. Shostack & G. Upah (Eds.), Emerging perspectives on services marketing (pp. 99–107). Chicago, IL: American Marketing Association.

MacCallum, R. C. (2009). Factor analysis. In R. E. Millsapand & A. Maydeu-Olivares (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of quantitative methods in psychology (pp. 123–147). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.CrossRef

Martínez, M., Blanco, M., & Castán, J. M. (2013). Dimensions of perceived service quality in higher education virtual learning environments. RUSC Universities and Knowledge Society Journal, 10(1), 89–106; 268–285. https://doi.org/10.7238/rusc.v10i1.1411

Martinez, M. J., Castan, J. M., & Juan, A. A. (2010). Using the critical incident technique to identify factors of service quality in online higher education. International Journal of Information Systems in the Service Sector,2(4), 56–71. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-0044-7.ch019.CrossRef

Martínez, L., & Martínez, J. (2007). Measuring perceived service quality in urgent transport service. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services,14(1), 60–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2006.04.001.CrossRef

Melo, L. A., Ramos, J. E., & Hernández, P. O. (2017). Higher education in Colombia: Current situation and efficiency analysis. Desarrollo y Sociedad,2017(78), 59–111. https://doi.org/10.13043/DYS.78.2.CrossRef

MENa. (2013). Lineamientos Política de Educación Superior Inclusiva. Ministerio de Educación Nacional de Colombia. Ministerio de Educación Nacional. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13398-014-0173-7.2

Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1985). A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. Journal of Marketing,49(4), 41–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251430.CrossRef

Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V., & Berry, L. (1988). SERVQUAL—A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing, 64(1), 12–40.

Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Malhotra, A. (2005). E-S-Qual. Journal of Service Research,7(3), 213–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670504271156.CrossRef

Pérez, J., & Giraldo, L. (2014). What can’t be ignored in service quality evaluation: Application contexts, tools and factors/Lo que no debe obviarse al evaluar la calidad del servicio: Contextos de aplicación, herramientas y factores. Revista Facultad de Ingeniería Universidad de Antioquia,2195575(72), 145–160.

Rama, C. (2012). Los caminos de las reformas. La virtualización universitaria en américa latina. Revista Historia de La Educación Latinoamericana,14(19), 45–70.

Rodríguez, G., Lorduy, V., & Ariza, M. (2014). Quality of higher education for distance and virtual learning: An analysis of academic performance in Colombia. Investigación & Desarrollo, 22(1), 79–120.CrossRef

Sabina, Đ., & Samira, F. (2015). Quality assessment in higher education using the Servqual Model. Management, 20(1), 39–57. Retrieved from https://www.efst.hr/management/Vol20No1-2015/3_Djonlagic_Fazlic.pdf

Selim, H. M. (2007). Critical success factors for e-learning acceptance: Confirmatory factor models. Computers & Education,49(2), 396–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.09.004.CrossRef

Seth, N., Deshmukh, S. G., & Vrat, P. (2005). Service quality models: A review. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management,22(9), 913–949. https://doi.org/10.1108/02656710510625211.CrossRef

Teas, R. K. (1993). Expectations, performance evaluation, and consumers’ perceptions of quality. Journal of Marketing,57(October), 18–34.

Teeroovengadum, V., Kamalanabhan, T. J., & Seebaluck, A. K. (2016). Measuring service quality in higher education. Quality Assurance in Education,24(2), 244–258. https://doi.org/10.1108/QAE-06-2014-0028.CrossRef

Torres, E., & Araya, L. (2010). Construcción de una escala para medir la calidad del servicio de las universidades: Una aplicación al contexto chileno. Revista de Ciencias Sociales, 16(1), 54–67. Retrieved from http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-78650531288&partnerID=tZOtx3y1

Udo, G. J., Bagchi, K. K., & Kirs, P. J. (2011). Using SERVQUAL to assess the quality of e-learning experience. Computers in Human Behavior,27(3), 1272–1283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.01.009.CrossRef

Uppal, M. A., Ali, S., & Gulliver, S. R. (2017). Factors determining e-learning service quality. British Journal of Educational Technology,49(3), 412–426. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12552.CrossRef

van Dyke, T. P., Kappelman, L. A., & Prybutok, V. R. (1997). Measuring information systems service quality: Concerns on the use of the SERVQUAL Questionnaire. MIS Quarterly,21(2), 195. https://doi.org/10.2307/249419.CrossRef

Walker, S., & Fraser, B. J. (2005). Development and validation of an instrument environments in higher education: The Distance Education Learning Environment Survey (DELES). Learning Environments Research,8, 289–308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-005-1568-3.CrossRef

Worthington, R. L., & Whittaker, T. A. (2006). Scale development research:a content analysis and recommendations for best practices. The Counseling Psychologist,34(6), 806–838. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000006288127.CrossRef

Titel: Perceived service quality factors in online higher education
verfasst von: Daniel La Rotta
Olga Cecilia Usuga
Valentina Clavijo
Publikationsdatum: 30.10.2019
Verlag: Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in: Learning Environments Research / Ausgabe 2/2020
Print ISSN: 1387-1579
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-1855
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-019-09299-6

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2020

Learning environments associated with technology-based science classrooms for gifted Singaporean females

Facebook class groups of high school students: their role in establishing social dynamics and learning experiences

Teacher adaptation to flexible learning environments

Psychometric properties of a Chinese version of the Constructivist Learning Environment Survey among secondary-school students in Hong Kong

Nature of learning environment in concurrent enrollment mathematics classrooms: a cluster analysis

Negative instructor communication behaviours: exploring associations between instructor misbehaviours and the classroom learning environment

Premium Partner