nach oben

Small Business Economics

Erschienen in:

01.08.2014

The origin of spin-offs: a typology of corporate and academic spin-offs

verfasst von: Helmut Fryges, Mike Wright

Erschienen in: Small Business Economics | Ausgabe 2/2014

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

We provide a typology of corporate and academic spin-off types, distinguishing spin-offs involving new ventures from those that concern existing activities. We summarize the papers published in this special issue, relating them to the typology we develop. We conclude by developing an agenda for further research on spin-offs.

Nächster Artikel The impact of local and external university knowledge on the creation of knowledge-intensive firms: evidence from the Italian case

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

In this paper, we use the term “university” to refer to all kind of publically funded, not-for-profit research organizations. In particular, this includes extra university research institutes.

Merton (1942, p. 270) outlines "four sets of institutional imperatives—universalism, communism, disinterestedness, organized scepticism—[that] comprise the ethos of modern science." See also Macfarlane and Cheng (2008) for a recent discussion of Merton’s norms.

The aforementioned legislative reforms and mechanisms of public support are not exclusively related to academic spin-offs that involve the transition of a university researcher from the university sector to the private sector. Other channels of university knowledge commercialization that are targeted by legislation and various public support mechanisms include university–industry partnerships, science parks, patenting, and licensing (see Phan and Siegel 2006, for an overview). Moreover, founders of alumni start-ups may likewise benefit from entrepreneurship education.

Corporate spin-offs are usually regarded as new firms that spun off from for-profit private firms. However, the concept of (entrepreneurial) corporate spin-offs does theoretically not exclude start-ups that are based on ideas emanating from state-owned companies. Although the business idea developed for example by an engineer working for a state-owned company might be similar to an idea developed in a for-profit private firm, the parent–spin-off relationship will be different. For instance, it is unlikely that the state-owned parent company will hold a share in the corporate spin-off or will provide any other kind of financial support.

Van de Velde et al. (2007) point out the employee’s wish to become self-employed and to work on an independent basis as a motivation for creating a corporate spin-off. However, the aspiration to become self-employed usually also coincides with the recognition of an entrepreneurial opportunity.

In contrast, Ito (1995) defines a corporate spin-off as a firm with a parent’s partial ownership that ranges between more than 0 and <100 %.

We thank Anna Lejpras and Andreas Stephan for pointing this out in a personal communication.

Agarwal, R., Audretsch, D., & Sarkar, M. (2010). Knowledge spillovers and strategic entrepreneurship. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 4(4), 271–283.CrossRef

Alvarez, S. A., & Barney, J. B. (2007). Discovery and creation: Alternative theories of entrepreneurial action. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1(1–2), 11–26.CrossRef

Bonaccorsi, A., Colombo, M. G., Guerini, M., & Rossi Lamastra, C. (2013). The impact of local and external university knowledge on the creation of knowledge-intensive firms: Evidence from the Italian case, Small Business Economics, this issue. doi:10.1007/s11187-013-9536-2.

Bruneel, J., van de Velde, E., & Clarysse, B. (2013). Impact of the type of corporate spin-off on growth. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37(4), 943–959.CrossRef

Buenstorf, G. (2009). Opportunity spin-offs and necessity spin-offs. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing, 1(1), 22–40.CrossRef

Chiesa, V., & Piccaluga, A. (2000). Exploitation and diffusion of public research: The case of academic spin-off companies in Italy. R&D Management, 30(4), 329–340.CrossRef

Clarysse, B., Bruneel, J., & Wright, M. (2011a). Explaining growth paths of young technology-based firms: Structuring resource portfolios in different competitive environments. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 5(2), 137–157.CrossRef

Clarysse, B., Wright, M., & van de Velde, E. (2011b). Entrepreneurial origin, technology endowments and the growth of spin-off companies. Journal of Management Studies, 48(6), 1420–1442.CrossRef

Czarnitzki, D., Rammer, C., & Toole, A. A. (2013). University Spinoffs and the “Performance Premium”, Small Business Economics, this issue. doi:10.1007/s11187-013-9538-0.

Di Gregorio, D., & Shane, S. (2003). Why do some universities generate more start-ups than others? Research Policy, 32, 209–227.CrossRef

Djokovic, D., & Souitaris, V. (2008). Spinouts from academic institutions: A literature review with suggestions for further research. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 33(3), 225–247.CrossRef

Drori, I., Honig, B., & Wright, M. (2009). Transnational entrepreneurship: An emergent field of study. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(5), 1001–1022.CrossRef

Egeln, J., Dinges, M., Knie, A., Simon, D., Braun-Thürmann, H., Fryges, H., et al. (2010). Evaluation des Existenzgründungsprogramms EXIST III, ZEW Wirtschaftsanalysen (Vol. 95). Baden-Baden: Nomos.CrossRef

Egeln, J., Gottschalk, S., Rammer, C., & Spielkamp, A. (2003). Public research spin-offs in Germany, summary report, ZEW Documentation 03-04. Mannheim: Centre for European Economic Research.

Eriksson, T., & Kuhn, J. M. (2006). Firm spin-offs in Denmark 1981–2000—Patterns of entry and exit. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 24(5), 1021–1040.CrossRef

Ferriani, S., Garnsey, E., & Lorenzoni, G. (2012). Continuity and change in a spin-off venture: The process of reimprinting. Industrial and Corporate Change, 21(4), 1011–1048.CrossRef

Fiet, J. (2002). The systematic search for entrepreneurial discoveries. Westport, CT: Quorum.

Franco, A. M., & Filson, D. (2006). Spin-outs: Knowledge diffusion through employee mobility. The Rand Journal of Economics, 37(4), 841–860.CrossRef

Fryges, H., Gottschalk, S., Gude, H., Kohn, K., Müller, K., Niefert, M. & Ullrich, K. (2010), Aufbruch nach dem Sturm. Junge Unternehmen zwischen Investitionsschwäche und Innovationsstrategie, Gründungspanelreport, Vol. 3, Creditreform, KfW, ZEW (eds.), Mannheim.

Fryges, H., Müller, B., & Niefert, M. (2013). Job machine, think tank, or both—What makes corporate spinoffs different? Small Business Economics, this issue. doi:10.1007/s11187-013-9540-6

Gilligan, J., & Wright, M. (2012). Private equity demystified–2012 edition. London: ICAEW.

Grimaldi, R., Kenney, M., Siegel, D. S., & Wright, M. (2011). 30 years after bayh–dole: Reassessing academic entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 40(8), 1045–1057.CrossRef

Helfat, C., & Lieberman, M. (2002). The birth of capabilities—Market entry and the importance of pre-history. Industrial and Corporate Change, 11, 725–760.CrossRef

Huyghe, A., Knockaert, M., Wright, M., & Piva, E. (2013). Technology transfer offices as boundary spanners in the pre-spin-off process: The case of a hybrid model, Small Business Economics, this issue. doi:10.1007/s11187-013-9537-1

Ito, K. (1995). Japanese spinoffs: Unexplored survival strategies. Strategic Management Journal, 16(6), 431–446.CrossRef

Klepper, S. (2002). The capabilities of new firms and the evolution of the US Automobile Industry. Industrial and Corporate Change, 11(4), 645–666.CrossRef

Lejpras, A. (2013). How innovative are spin-offs at later stages of development? Comparing innovativeness of established research spin-offs and otherwise created firms, Small Business Economics, this issue. doi:10.1007/s11187-013-9534-4

Lejpras, A., & Stephan, A. (2011). Locational conditions, cooperation, and innovativeness: evidence from research and company spin-offs. The Annals of Regional Science, 46(3), 543–575.CrossRef

Liu, X., Wright, M., Filatotchev, I., Dai, O., & Lu, J. (2010). Human mobility and international knowledge spillovers: Evidence from high-tech small and medium enterprises in an emerging market. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 4(4), 340–355.CrossRef

Macfarlane, B., & Cheng, M. (2008). Communism, universalism and disinterestedness: Re-examining contemporary support among academics for Merton’s scientific norms. Journal of Academic Ethics, 6, 67–78.CrossRef

Merton, R. K. (1942). The normative structure of science (1973), In N. Storer (Ed.), The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations (pp. 267–278). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Morales-Gualdrón, S. T., Gutiérrez-Garcia, A., & Roig Dobón, S. (2009). The entrepreneurial motivation in academia: A multidimensional construct. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 5(3), 301–317.CrossRef

Mueller, K. (2010). Academic spin-off’s transfer speed—Analyzing the time from leaving university to venture. Research Policy, 39(2), 189–199.CrossRef

Muendler, M.-A., Rauch, J. E., & Tocoian, O. (2012). Employee spinoffs and other entrants: Stylized facts from Brazil. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 30(5), 447–458.CrossRef

Mustar, P., Renault, M., Colombo, M. G., Piva, E., Fontes, M., Lockett, A., et al. (2006). Conceptualising the heterogeneity of research-based spin-offs: A multi-dimensional taxonomy. Research Policy, 35, 289–308.CrossRef

Mustar, P., & Wright, M. (2010). Convergence or path dependency in policies to foster the creation of university spin-off firms? A comparison of France and the United Kingdom. Journal of Technology Transfer, 35(1), 42–65.CrossRef

Narayan, V., Yang, Y., & Zahra, S. (2009). Corporate venturing and value creation: A review and proposed framework. Research Policy, 38(1), 58–76.CrossRef

Nicolaou, N., & Birley, S. (2003). Academic networks in a trichotomous categorisation of university spinouts. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(3), 333–359.CrossRef

Parhankangas, A., & Arenius, P. (2003). From a corporate venture to an independent company: A base for a taxonomy for corporate spin-off firms. Research Policy, 32, 463–481.CrossRef

Phan, P., & Siegel, D. S. (2006). The effectiveness of university technology transfer: Lessons learned, managerial and policy implications, and the road forward. Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship, 2(2), 77–144.CrossRef

Phan, P., Wright, M., Ucbasaran, D., & Tan, W. (2009). Corporate entrepreneurship: Current research and future direction. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(3), 197–205.CrossRef

Robbie, K., & Wright, M. (1996). Management Buyins. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

Sapienza, H. J., Parhankangas, A., & Autio, E. (2004). Knowledge relatedness and post-spin-off growth. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(6), 809–829.CrossRef

Siegel, D. S., Veugelers, R., & Wright, M. (2007). Technology transfer offices and commercialization of university intellectual property: Performance and policy implications. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 23(4), 640–660.CrossRef

Smilor, R. W., Gibson, D. V., & Dietrich, G. B. (1990). University spinout companies: Technology start-ups from UT-Austin. Journal of Business Venturing, 5(1), 63–76.CrossRef

Stam, W., & Elfring, T. (2008). Entrepreneurial orientation and new venture performance: The moderating role of intra- and extraindustry social capital. Academy of Management Journal, 51(1), 97–111.CrossRef

Stephan, A. (2013). Are public research spin-offs more innovative? Small Business Economics, this issue. doi:10.1007/s11187-013-9539-z

Stuart, T. E., & Ding, W. W. (2006). When do scientists become entrepreneurs? The social structural antecedents of commercial activity in the academic life sciences. American Journal of Sociology, 112(1), 97–144.CrossRef

Van de Velde, E., Clarysse, B., Wright, M., & Bruneel, J. (2007). Exploring the boundary between entrepreneurship and corporate venturing: From assisted spin-outs to entrepreneurial spin-offs, working paper 2007/472. Ghent: Ghent University.

Veld, C., & Veld-Merkoulova, Y. V. (2009). Value creation through spin-offs: A review of the empirical evidence. International Journal of Management Reviews, 11(4), 407–420.CrossRef

Weatherston, J. (1995). Academic entrepreneurs: Is a spin-off company too risky? Proceedings of the 40th International Council for Small Business (ICSB), Small Business Advancement National Center, University of Central Arkansas, http://www.sbaer.uca.edu/research/icsb/1995/pdf/20.pdf.

Wennberg, K., Wiklund, J., & Wright, M. (2011). The effectiveness of university knowledge spillovers: Performance differences between university spinoffs and corporate spinoffs. Research Policy, 40(8), 1128–1143.CrossRef

Wright, M. (1986). The make-buy decision and managing markets: The case of management buy-outs. Journal of Management Studies, 23(4), 443–464.CrossRef

Wright, M. (2011). Entrepreneurial mobility, In D. Bergh, & D. Ketchen, Research Methodology in Strategy and Management (Vol. 6, pp. 137–162). Bingley: Emerald.

Wright, M. (2013) Academic entrepreneurship, technology transfer and society: Where next? Journal of Technology Transfer, forthcoming.

Wright, M., Clarysse, B., Mustar, P., & Lockett, A. (2007). Academic entrepreneurship in Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRef

Wright, M., Hoskisson, R., Busenitz, L., & Dial, J. (2000). Privatisation and entrepreneurship: The upside of management buy-outs. Academy of Management Review, 25(3), 591–601.

Wright, M., Lockett, A., Clarysse, B., & Binks, M. (2006). University spin-offs and venture capital. Research Policy, 35(4), 481–501.CrossRef

Wright, M., Thompson, S., & Robbie, K. (1993). Finance and control in privatisation by management buyout. Financial Accountability and Management, 9(2), 75–99.CrossRef

Zahra, S., & Wright, M. (2011). Entrepreneurship’s next act. Academy of Management Perspectives, 25, 67–83.CrossRef

Titel: The origin of spin-offs: a typology of corporate and academic spin-offs
verfasst von: Helmut Fryges
Mike Wright
Publikationsdatum: 01.08.2014
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Small Business Economics / Ausgabe 2/2014
Print ISSN: 0921-898X
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-0913
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-013-9535-3

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2014

Entrepreneurship and innovation networks

The role of knowledge variety and intensity for regional innovation

How much of a socialist legacy? The re-emergence of entrepreneurship in the East German transformation to a market economy

How innovative are spin-offs at later stages of development? Comparing innovativeness of established research spin-offs and otherwise created firms

University spin-offs and the “performance premium”

Survival, productivity and growth of new ventures across locations

Premium Partner