Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
MTZ-Fachkongress

Antriebe und Energiesysteme von morgen


Austausch von Automobil- und Energiewirtschaft

Am 14./15. Mai geht es in Chemnitz um die Mobilitätswende durch Elektro- und Wasserstofffahrzeuge.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Computational Mechanics
Erschienen in: Computational Mechanics 2/2021

19.06.2021 | Original Paper

A numerical formulation for cavitating flows around marine propellers based on variational multiscale method

verfasst von: A. Bayram, A. Korobenko

Erschienen in: Computational Mechanics | Ausgabe 2/2021

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

A numerical approach for modelling cavitating flows over moving hydrodynamic surfaces is presented. The operating fluid is modelled as an isothermal homogeneous mixture of water vapor and liquid phases. The flow field is governed by the Navier–Stokes equations along with a transport equation for the vapor volume fraction. The Arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian description of the continuum is adopted to handle fluid flow simulations on moving domains. The residual based variational multiscale method is used to model the turbulent flow together with wall modelling implemented by the weak imposition of the no-slip boundary condition. Merkle and Zwart cavitation models are implemented and compared. First, a cavitating flow over a 3D hemispherical fore-body is modeled to perform a detailed comparison between two models. Next, the cavitating flow over the INSEAN E779A marine propeller is modeled and results are compared to available experimental data showing good agreement.
Vorheriger Artikel Fully anisotropic hyperelasto-plasticity with exponential approximation by power series and scaling/squaring
Nächster Artikel FFT phase-field model combined with cohesive composite voxels for fracture of composite materials with interfaces

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Literatur
1.
Burrill LC (1951) Sir Charles Parsons and cavitation. The Institute of Marine Engineers, Transactions, vol LXIII, no 8
2.
Kuiper G (1997) Cavitation research and ship propeller design. Appl Sci Res 58(1–4):33–50CrossRef
3.
Krella AK, Zakrzewska DE (2018) Cavitation erosion-phenomenon and test rigs. Adv Mater Sci 18(2):15–26CrossRef
4.
Goldstein S (1929) On the vortex theory of screw propellers. Proc R Soc Lond Ser A Contain Pap Math Phys Charact 123(792):440–465MATH
5.
Schoenherr KE (1939) Propulsion and propellers. Princ Naval Archit 2:148–150
6.
Lerbs HW (1952) Moderately loaded propellers with a finite number of blades and a arbitrary distribution of circulations. Trans SNAME 60:73–123
7.
Eckhardt MK, Morgan WB (1955) A propeller design method. SNAME Trans 63:1955
8.
van Manen JD (1957) Fundamentals of ship resistance and propulsion. Int Shipbuild Progr 4(35):371–391CrossRef
9.
Lerbs HW (1955) Propeller pitch correction arising from lifting surface effect. Technical report, David Taylor Model Basin Washington DC
10.
Nelson DM (1964) A lifting-surface propeller design method for high-speed computers. Technical report, Naval Ordnance Test Station China Lake CA
11.
Morgan WB, Silovic V, Denny SB (1968) Propeller lifting-surface corrections. Technical report, Hydro and Aerodynamics Lab Lyngby (Denmark) Hydrodynamics Section
12.
Kuiper G (1981) Cavitation inception on ship propeller models. Ph.D. Thesis, Technische Hogeschool Delft
13.
Tulin MP (1953) Steady two-dimensional cavity flows about slender bodies. David W. Taylor Model Basin, Washington DC, USA, Department of the Navy, Research and Development Report 834
14.
Geurst JA, Verbrugh PJ (1959) A note on camber effects of a partially cavitated hydrofoil. Int Shipbuild Progr 6(61):409–414CrossRef
15.
Geurst JA (1961) Linearized theory of two-dimensional cavity flows. Technical report, Technische Hogeschool Delft
16.
Fabula AG (1962) Thin-airfoil theory applied to hydrofoils with a single finite cavity and arbitrary free-streamline detachment. J Fluid Mech 12(2):227–240MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
17.
Tulin MP (1963) Supercavitating flows-small perturbation theory. Technical report, Hydronautics Inc Laurel MD
18.
Wade RB (1967) Linearized theory of a partially cavitating plano-convex hydrofoil including the effects of camber and thickness. J Ship Res 11(1):20–27CrossRef
19.
Kinnas SA (1985) Non-linear corrections to the linear theory for the prediction of the cavitating flow around hydrofoils. Ph.D Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
20.
Kinnas SA et al (1991) Leading-edge corrections to the linear theory of partially cavitating hydrofoils. J Ship Res 35(01):15–27CrossRef
21.
Tulin MP, Chun CH (1980) New application of cavity flow theory. In: 13th Symposium on naval hydrodynamics, Tokyo, pp 107–132
22.
Widnall SE et al (1966) Unsteady loads on supercavitating hydrofoils of finite span. J Ship Res 10(02):107–118CrossRef
23.
Lee C-S (1979) Predicton of steady and unsteady performance of marine propellers with or without cavitation by numerical lifting-surface theory. Ph.D. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
24.
Lee C-S (1980) Prediction of the transient cavitation on marine propellers by numerical lifting-surface theory. In: Proceedings of 13th symposium on naval hydrodynamics, pp 41–64
25.
Breslin JP, Kerwin JE (1983) Theoretical and experimental propeller-induced hull pressures arising from intermittent blade cavitation loading and thickness. Technical report, Maritime Technical Information Facility
26.
Kerwin JE (1986) Marine propellers. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 18(1):367–403CrossRef
27.
Kerwin JE (1961) The solution of propeller lifting surface problems by vortex lattice methods. Technical report, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge Dept of Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering
28.
Kerwin JE, Lee C-S (1978) Prediction of steady and unsteady marine propeller performance by numerical lifting-surface theory. Technical report, Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers
29.
Szantyr JA (1985) A new method for the analysis of unsteady propeller cavitation and hull surface pressures. R Inst Naval Arch Trans 127
30.
Kinnas SA, Fine NE (1989) Theoretical prediction of midchord and face unsteady propeller sheet cavitation. In: International conference on numerical ship hydrodynamics, 5th, pp 685–700
31.
Kinnas SA et al (1992) A general theory for the coupling between thickness and loading for wings and propellers. J Ship Res 36(01):59–68CrossRef
32.
Kinnas SA, Lee H, Young YL (2003) Modeling of unsteady sheet cavitation on marine propeller blades. Int J Rotat Mach 9(4):263–277CrossRef
33.
Hess JL, Valarezo WO (1985) Calculation of steady flow about propellers using a surface panel method. J Propul Power 1(6):470–476CrossRef
34.
Lee J (1987) A potential based panel method for the analysis of marine propellers in steady flow. Ph.D. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
35.
Fine NE (1992) Nonlinear analysis of cavitating propellers in nonuniform flow. Ph.D. Thesis, Massachusetts institute of Technology
36.
Kinnas SA, Fine NE (1992) A nonlinear boundary element method for the analysis of unsteady propeller sheet cavitation. In: Proceedings of the 19th symposium on naval hydrodynamics, pp 717–737
37.
Lee H, Kinnas SA, Gu H, Natarajan S (2003). Numerical modeling of rudder sheet cavitation including propeller/rudder interaction and the effects of a tunnel. In: Fifth international symposium on cavitation (CAV 2003) proceedings, pp CAV03–GS–12–005
38.
Young YL, Kinnas SA (2001) A BEM for the prediction of unsteady midchord face and/or back propeller cavitation. J Fluids Eng 123(2):311–319CrossRef
39.
Lee H, Kinnas SA (2004) Application of a boundary element method in the prediction of unsteady blade sheet and developed tip vortex cavitation on marine propellers. J Ship Res 48(1):15–30CrossRef
40.
Lee H, Kinnas SA (2005) Unsteady wake alignment for propellers in nonaxisymmetric flows. J Ship Res 49(3):176–190CrossRef
41.
Salvatore F, Greco L, Calcagni D (2011). Computational analysis of marine propeller performance and cavitation by using an inviscid-flow BEM model. In: Second international symposium on marine propulsors (SMP2011), Hamburg, Germany, pp 72–79
42.
Vaz G, Hally D, Huuva T, Bulten N, Muller P, Becchi P, Herrer J, Whitworth S, Macé R, Korsström A (2015) Cavitating flow calculations for the E779A propeller in open water and behind conditions: code comparison and solution validation. In: Proceedings of the 4th international symposium on marine propulsors (SMP15), Austin, TX, USA, pp 330–345
43.
Perali P, Lloyd T, Vaz G (2016). Comparison of uRANS and BEM-BEM for propeller pressure pulse prediction: E779A propeller in a cavitation tunnel. In: Proceedings of the 19th numerical towing tank symposium, pp 90–95
44.
Vaz G, de Campos J, Bosschers J, de Eça L (2005)Instituto Superior de Ciências do Trabalho e da Empresa. Modelling of sheet cavitation on hydrofoils and marine propellers using boundary element methods
45.
Carlton J (2018) Marine propellers and propulsion. Butterworth-Heinemann
46.
Kubota A, Kato H, Yamaguchi H (1992) A new modelling of cavitating flows: a numerical study of unsteady cavitation on a hydrofoil section. J Fluid Mech 240:59–96CrossRef
47.
Merkle CL (1998) Computational modelling of the dynamics of sheet cavitation. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international symposium on cavitation, Grenoble, France, 1998, pp 307–313
48.
Kunz RF, Boger DA, Stinebring DR, Chyczewski TS, Lindau JW, Gibeling HJ, Venkateswaran S, Govindan TR (2000) A preconditioned Navier–Stokes method for two-phase flows with application to cavitation prediction. Comput Fluids 29(8):849–875MATHCrossRef
49.
Schnerr GH, Sauer J (2001) Physical and numerical modeling of unsteady cavitation dynamics. In: Fourth international conference on multiphase flow, vol 1. ICMF New Orleans
50.
Singhal AK, Athavale MM, Li H, Jiang Y (2002) Mathematical basis and validation of the full cavitation model. J Fluids Eng 124(3):617–624CrossRef
51.
Zwart PJ, Gerber AG, Belamri T , et al (2004) A two-phase flow model for predicting cavitation dynamics. In: Fifth international conference on multiphase flow, Yokohama, Japan, vol 152
52.
Abdel-Maksoud M, SVA P M B (2003). Numerical and experimental study of cavitation behaviour of a propeller. Jahrbuch der Schiffbautechnischen Gesellschaft, pp 35–43
53.
54.
Salvatore F, Streckwall H, Van Terwisga T (2009) Propeller cavitation modelling by CFD-results from the VIRTUE 2008 Rome workshop. In: Proceedings of the first international symposium on marine propulsors, Trondheim, Norway, pp 22–24. Citeseer
55.
Salvatore F, Pereira F, Felli M, Calcagni D, Di Felice F (2006) Description of the INSEAN E779A propeller experimental dataset. Technical report, INSEAN Tech. rep. 2006-085
56.
Heinke HJ, Lubke L (2011) The SMP 2011 workshop on cavitation and propeller performance-case 2, propeller open water performance and cavitation behaviour. In: Proceedings of first workshop on cavitation and propeller performance, the second international symposium on marine propulsors, SMP, pp 36–42
57.
Gaggero S, Villa D (2017) Steady cavitating propeller performance by using OpenFOAM, StarCCM+ and a boundary element method. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part M J Eng Maritime Environ 231(2):411–440
58.
Reboud J-L, Stutz B, Coutier O (1998) Two phase flow structure of cavitation: experiment and modeling of unsteady effects. In: 3rd international symposium on cavitation CAV1998, Grenoble, France, vol 26, pp 203–208
59.
Coutier-Delgosha O, Fortes-Patella R, Reboud J-L (2003) Evaluation of the turbulence model influence on the numerical simulations of unsteady cavitation. J Fluids Eng 125(1):38–45CrossRef
60.
Bensow RE, Bark G (2010) Implicit LES predictions of the cavitating flow on a propeller. J Fluids Eng 132(4)
61.
Lu N-X, Bensow RE, Bark G (2014) Large eddy simulation of cavitation development on highly skewed propellers. J Mar Sci Technol 19(2):197–214CrossRef
62.
Kurobe Y (1983) Measurement of cavity volume and pressure fluctuations on a model of the training ship “Seiun-Maru” with reference to full scale measurement. Rep Ship Res Inst 20(6)
63.
Yu C, Wang Y, Huang C, Wu X, Du T (2017) Large eddy simulation of unsteady cavitating flow around a highly skewed propeller in nonuniform wake. J Fluids Eng 139(4)
64.
Asnaghi A, Svennberg U, Bensow RE (2018) Numerical and experimental analysis of cavitation inception behaviour for high-skewed low-noise propellers. Appl Ocean Res 79:197–214CrossRef
65.
Yilmaz N, Atlar M, Khorasanchi M (2019) An improved mesh adaption and refinement approach to cavitation simulation (MARCS) of propellers. Ocean Eng 171:139–150CrossRef
66.
Hughes TJR, Mazzei L, Jansen KE (2000) Large eddy simulation and the variational multiscale method. Comput Vis Sci 3(1–2):47–59MATHCrossRef
67.
Bazilevs Y, Calo VM, Cottrell JA, Hughes TJR, Reali A, Scovazzi G (2007a) Variational multiscale residual-based turbulence modeling for large eddy simulation of incompressible flows. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 197(1–4):173–201MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
68.
Calo VM (2004) Residual-based multiscale turbulence modeling: finite volume simulations of bypass transition. Ph.D. Thesis, Stanford University Stanford, CA
69.
Motlagh YG, Ahn HT, Hughes TJR, Calo VM (2013) Simulation of laminar and turbulent concentric pipe flows with the isogeometric variational multiscale method. Comput Fluids 71:146–155MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
70.
Bazilevs Y, Yan J, De Stadler M, Sarkar S (2014a) Computation of the flow over a sphere at Re= 3700: A comparison of uniform and turbulent inflow conditions. J Appl Mech 81(12)
71.
Akkerman I, Bazilevs Y, Kees CE, Farthing MW (2011) Isogeometric analysis of free-surface flow. J Comput Phys 230:4137–4152MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
72.
Akkerman I, Bazilevs Y, Benson DJ, Farthing MW, Kees CE (2012a) Free-surface flow and fluid-object interaction modeling with emphasis on ship hydrodynamics. J Appl Mech 79
73.
Akkerman I, Dunaway J, Kvandal J, Spinks J, Bazilevs Y (2012b) Toward free-surface modeling of planing vessels: simulation of the Fridsma hull using ALE-VMS. Comput Mech 50:719–727CrossRef
74.
75.
76.
77.
78.
79.
80.
81.
82.
83.
84.
85.
86.
87.
88.
89.
90.
91.
92.
93.
Bazilevs Y, Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE, Ming-Chen Hsu, Otoguro Y, Mochizuki H, Wu MCH (2020) bALE and space–time variational multiscale isogeometric analysis of wind turbines and turbomachinery. In: Grama A, Sameh A (eds) Parallel algorithms in computational science and engineering, modeling and simulation in science, engineering and technology. Springer, Berlin, pp 195–233. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​978-3-030-43736-7_​7CrossRefMATH
94.
Otoguro Y, Mochizuki H, Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE (2019a) Space–time variational multiscale isogeometric analysis of a tsunami-shelter vertical axis wind turbine. in preparation
95.
96.
97.
98.
99.
100.
Takizawa K, Bazilevs Y, Tezduyar TE, Korobenko A (2020b) Variational multiscale flow analysis in aerospace, energy and transportation technologies. In: Grama A, Sameh A (eds) Parallel algorithms in computational science and engineering, modeling and simulation in science, engineering and technology. Springer, Berlin, pp 235–280. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​978-3-030-43736-7_​8CrossRefMATH
101.
Bazilevs Y, Korobenko A, Deng X, Yan J (2016) FSI modeling for fatigue-damage prediction in full-scale wind-turbine blades. J Appl Mech 83 (6)
102.
103.
Bazilevs Y, Korobenko A, Deng X, Yan J, Kinzel M, Dabiri JO (2014c) FSI modeling of vertical-axis wind turbines. J Appl Mech 10(1115/1):4027466
104.
Bazilevs Y, Hsu M-C, Kiendl J, Wüchner R, Bletzinger K-U (2011b) 3D simulation of wind turbine rotors at full scale. Part II: fluid-structure interaction modeling with composite blades. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 65:236–253MATHCrossRef
105.
Hsu M-C, Akkerman I, Bazilevs Y (2011) High-performance computing of wind turbine aerodynamics using isogeometric analysis. Comput Fluids 49:93–100MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
106.
Bazilevs Y, Hsu M-C, Scott MA (2012) Isogeometric fluid-structure interaction analysis with emphasis on non-matching discretizations, and with application to wind turbines. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 249–252:28–41MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
107.
Hsu M-C, Akkerman I, Bazilevs Y (2014a) Finite element simulation of wind turbine aerodynamics: validation study using NREL Phase VI experiment. Wind Energy 17:461–481CrossRef
108.
Korobenko A, Hsu M-C, Akkerman I, Tippmann J, Bazilevs Y (2013b) Structural mechanics modeling and FSI simulation of wind turbines. Math Models Methods Appl Sci 23:249–272MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
109.
110.
Korobenko A, Bazilevs Y, Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE (2018) Recent advances in ALE-VMS and ST-VMS computational aerodynamic and FSI analysis of wind turbines. In: Tezduyar TE (ed) Frontiers in computational fluid-structure interaction and flow simulation: research from lead investigators under forty-2018, Modeling and simulation in science, engineering and technology. Springer, Berlin, pp 253–336. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​978-3-319-96469-0_​7CrossRef
111.
112.
113.
Takizawa K, Terahara T, Tezduyar TE (2020c) Space–time flow computation with contact between the moving solid surfaces. To appear in a special volume to be published by Springer
114.
Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE, Terahara T, Sasaki T (2018a) Heart valve flow computation with the space-time slip interface topology change (ST-SI-TC) method and isogeometric analysis (IGA). In: Wriggers P, Lenarz T (eds) Biomedical technology: modeling, experiments and simulation. Lecture notes in applied and computational mechanics. Springer, Berlin, pp 77–99. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​978-3-319-59548-1_​6CrossRef
115.
116.
Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE, Uchikawa H, Terahara T, Sasaki T, Shiozaki K, Yoshida A, Komiya K, Inoue G (2018b) Aorta flow analysis and heart valve flow and structure analysis. In: Tezduyar TE (ed) Frontiers in computational fluid-structure interaction and flow simulation: research from lead investigators under forty—2018, Modeling and simulation in science, engineering and technology. Springer, Berlin, pp 29–89. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​978-3-319-96469-0_​2CrossRef
117.
118.
Hughes TJR, Takizawa K, Bazilevs Y, Tezduyar TE, Hsu M-C (2019) Computational cardiovascular analysis with the variational multiscale methods and isogeometric discretization. In: Grama A, Sameh A (eds) Parallel algorithms in computational science and engineering, Modeling and simulation in science, engineering and technology. Springer, Berlin
119.
120.
121.
Suito H, Takizawa K, Huynh VQH, Sze D, Ueda T, Tezduyar TE (2016) A geometrical-characteristics study in patient-specific FSI analysis of blood flow in the thoracic aorta. In: Bazilevs Y, Takizawa K (eds) Advances in computational fluid-structure interaction and flow simulation: new methods and challenging computations, Modeling and simulation in science, engineering and technology. Springer, Berlin, pp 379–386. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​978-3-319-40827-9_​29CrossRefMATH
122.
123.
124.
125.
126.
127.
Hsu M-C, Kamensky D, Xu F, Kiendl J, Wang C, Wu MCH, Mineroff J, Reali A, Bazilevs Y, Sacks MS (2015) Dynamic and fluid-structure interaction simulations of bioprosthetic heart valves using parametric design with T-splines and Fung-type material models. Comput Mech 55:1211–1225. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00466-015-1166-xCrossRefMATH
128.
Kamensky D, Hsu M-C, Schillinger D, Evans JA, Aggarwal A, Bazilevs Y, Sacks MS, Hughes TJR (2015) An immersogeometric variational framework for fluid-structure interaction: application to bioprosthetic heart valves. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 284:1005–1053MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
129.
Bazilevs Y, Calo VM, Zhang Y, Hughes TJR (2006) Isogeometric fluid-structure interaction analysis with applications to arterial blood flow. Comput Mech 38:310–322MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
130.
Bazilevs Y, Calo VM, Hughes TJR, Zhang Y (2008) Isogeometric fluid-structure interaction: theory, algorithms, and computations. Comput Mech 43:3–37MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
131.
Bazilevs Y, Gohean JR, Hughes TJR, Moser RD, Zhang Y (2009a) Patient-specific isogeometric fluid-structure interaction analysis of thoracic aortic blood flow due to implantation of the Jarvik 2000 left ventricular assist device. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 198:3534–3550MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
132.
Bazilevs Y, Hsu M-C, Benson D, Sankaran S, Marsden A (2009b) Computational fluid-structure interaction: methods and application to a total cavopulmonary connection. Comput Mech 45:77–89MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
133.
Bazilevs Y, Hsu M-C, Zhang Y, Wang W, Liang X, Kvamsdal T, Brekken R, Isaksen J (2010a) A fully-coupled fluid-structure interaction simulation of cerebral aneurysms. Comput Mech 46:3–16MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
134.
Bazilevs Y, Hsu M-C, Zhang Y, Wang W, Kvamsdal T, Hentschel S, Isaksen J (2010b) Computational fluid–structure interaction: methods and application to cerebral aneurysms. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 9:481–498CrossRef
135.
Hsu M-C, Bazilevs Y (2011) Blood vessel tissue prestress modeling for vascular fluid-structure interaction simulations. Finite Elem Anal Des 47:593–599MathSciNetCrossRef
136.
Takizawa K, Henicke B, Puntel A, Spielman T, Tezduyar TE (2012b) Space–time computational techniques for the aerodynamics of flapping wings. J Appl Mech 10(1115/1):4005073MATH
137.
138.
139.
140.
141.
142.
143.
144.
145.
146.
147.
148.
149.
150.
Otoguro Y, Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE (2018) A general-purpose NURBS mesh generation method for complex geometries. In: Tezduyar TE (ed) Frontiers in computational fluid-structure interaction and flow simulation: research from lead investigators under forty–2018, Modeling and simulation in science, engineering and technology. Springer, Berlin, pp 399–434. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​978-3-319-96469-0_​10CrossRef
151.
152.
153.
Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE (2016) New directions in space-time computational methods. In: Bazilevs Y, Takizawa K (eds) Advances in computational fluid-structure interaction and flow simulation: new methods and challenging computations, Modeling and simulation in science, engineering and technology. Springer, Berlib, pp 159–178. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​978-3-319-40827-9_​13CrossRef
154.
155.
Kuraishi T, Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE (2018) Space-time computational analysis of tire aerodynamics with actual geometry, road contact and tire deformation. In: Tezduyar TE (ed) Frontiers in computational fluid-structure interaction and flow simulation: research from lead investigators under forty–2018, Modeling and simulation in science, engineering and technology. Springer, Berlin, pp 337–376. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​978-3-319-96469-0_​8CrossRef
156.
157.
158.
Tezduyar TE, Takizawa K, Kuraishi T (2020). Space–time computational FSI and flow analysis: 2004 and beyond. To appear in a special volume to be published by Springer
159.
160.
161.
162.
163.
164.
165.
166.
167.
168.
169.
170.
171.
Rouse H, McNown JS (1948). Cavitation and pressure distribution: head forms at zero angle of yaw. Technical report, State University of Iowa
172.
Rayleigh Lord. VIII (1917) On the pressure developed in a liquid during the collapse of a spherical cavity. Lond Edinb Dublin Philos Mag J Sci 34(200):94–98
173.
Plesset MS, Prosperetti A (1977) Bubble dynamics and cavitation. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 9(1):145–185MATHCrossRef
174.
Yeckel A, Derby JJ (1999) On setting a pressure datum when computing incompressible flows. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 29(1):19–34MATHCrossRef
175.
Owis FM, Nayfeh AH (2001). Numerical simulation of super-and partially-cavitating flows over an axisymmetric projectile. In: 39th aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit, p 1042
176.
Owis FM, Nayfeh AH (2004) Numerical simulation of 3-D incompressible, multi-phase flows over cavitating projectiles. Eur J Mech-B/Fluids 23(2):339–351MATHCrossRef
177.
Brooks AN, Hughes TJR (1982) Streamline upwind/Petrov–Galerkin formulations for convection dominated flows with particular emphasis on the incompressible Navier–Stokes equations. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 32:199–259MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
178.
Akin J, Tezduyar TE, Ungor M, Mittal S (2003) Stabilization parameters and Smagorinsky turbulence model. J Appl Mech 70(1):2–9MATHCrossRef
179.
Tezduyar TE, Sathe S (2003) Stabilization parameters in SUPG and PSPG formulations. J Comput Appl Mech 4(1):71–88MathSciNetMATH
180.
Tezduyar TE (2007) Finite elements in fluids: stabilized formulations and moving boundaries and interfaces. Comput Fluids 36(2):191–206MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
181.
Tezduyar TE, Ramakrishnan S, Sathe S (2008) Stabilized formulations for incompressible flows with thermal coupling. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 57(9):1189–1209MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
182.
Hsu M-C, Bazilevs Y, Calo VM, Tezduyar TE, Hughes TJR (2010) Improving stability of stabilized and multiscale formulations in flow simulations at small time steps. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 199(13–16):828–840MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
183.
184.
Otoguro Y, Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE (2019d) Element length calculation in B-spline meshes for complex ceometries. Comput Mech, submitted
185.
Hughes TJR, Mallet M, Akira M (1986) A new finite element formulation for computational fluid dynamics: II. Beyond SUPG. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 54(3):341–355MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
186.
Tezduyar TE, Park YJ (1986) Discontinuity-capturing finite element formulations for nonlinear convection–diffusion–reaction equations. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 59(3):307–325MATHCrossRef
187.
Tezduyar TE (2003) Computation of moving boundaries and interfaces and stabilization parameters. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 43(5):555–575MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
188.
Bazilevs Y, Hughes TJR (2007) Weak imposition of Dirichlet boundary conditions in fluid mechanics. Comput Fluids 36(1):12–26MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
189.
Bazilevs Y, Michler C, Calo VM, Hughes TJR (2007) Weak Dirichlet boundary conditions for wall-bounded turbulent flows. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 196(49–52):4853–4862MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
190.
Chung J, Hulbert GM (1993) A time integration algorithm for structural dynamics with improved numerical dissipation: the generalized-\(\alpha \) method. J Appl Mech
191.
Jansen KE, Whiting CH, Hulbert GM (2000) A generalized-\(\alpha \) method for integrating the filtered Navier–Stokes equations with a stabilized finite element method. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 190(3–4):305–319MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
192.
Saad Y (2003) Iterative methods for sparse linear systems, vol 82. SIAM
193.
Kim S-E (2008) A multiphase approach to turbulent cavitating flow. In: Proceedings of 27th symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics, Seoul, Korea, 2008, pp 572–589
194.
Guaily AG, Epstein M (2013) Boundary conditions for hyperbolic systems of partial differentials equations. J Adv Res 4(4):321–329CrossRef
195.
Ayyad M, Guaily A, Hassanein MA (2020). Stabilized variational formulation of an oldroyd-B fluid flow equations on a graphic processing unit (GPU) architecture. Comput Phys Commun, p 107495
196.
Wagner W, Kretzschmar H-J (2007) International steam tables-properties of water and steam based on the industrial formulation IAPWS-IF97: Tables, algorithms, diagrams, and CD-ROM electronic steam tables-all of the equations of IAPWS-IF97 including a complete set of supplementary backward equations for fast calculations of heat cycles, boilers, and steam turbines. Springer
197.
Celik IB, Ghia U, Roache PJ, Freitas CJ (2008) Procedure for estimation and reporting of uncertainty due to discretization in CFD applications. J Fluids Eng Trans ASME 130(7)
Metadaten
Titel
A numerical formulation for cavitating flows around marine propellers based on variational multiscale method
verfasst von
A. Bayram
A. Korobenko
Publikationsdatum
19.06.2021
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Computational Mechanics / Ausgabe 2/2021
Print ISSN: 0178-7675
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0924
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-021-02039-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2021

Computational Mechanics 2/2021 Zur Ausgabe

Original Paper

Phase-field approach in elastoplastic solids: application of an iterative staggered scheme and its experimental validation

Original Paper

Scale-bridging with the extended/generalized finite element method for linear elastodynamics

Original Paper

Enhanced computational homogenization techniques for modelling size effects in polymer composites

Original Paper

Microstructure-informed reduced modes synthesized with Wang tiles and the Generalized Finite Element Method

Original Paper

Fully anisotropic hyperelasto-plasticity with exponential approximation by power series and scaling/squaring

Original Paper

Multi-resolution methods for the topology optimization of nonlinear electro-active polymers at large strains

Neuer Inhalt

    Bildnachweise