Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Quantum Information Processing
Erschienen in: Quantum Information Processing 4/2021

01.04.2021

Measurement-device-independent mutual quantum entity authentication

verfasst von: Ji-Woong Choi, Min-Sung Kang, Chang Hoon Park, Hyung-Jin Yang, Sang-Wook Han

Erschienen in: Quantum Information Processing | Ausgabe 4/2021

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Quantum entity authentication (QEA) based on security guaranteed by the laws of physics is the first and most important step for secure communication under the threat of a quantum adversary. QEA theoretically provides unconditional security; however, there is a threat of quantum hacking owing to imperfection of measurement devices in the actual implementation. The proposed measurement-device-independent (MDI) mutual quantum entity authentication (MQEA) scheme guarantees its security under any quantum attacks on measuring devices that have been reported. Using the MDI architecture in our scheme, the third party can only know the correlation of the transmitted qubits through the Bell state measurement, and it cannot obtain the secret key information. In order to confirm the security of the proposed scheme, we present a security analysis of secret key information that is pre-shared among legitimate users, and we analyze Eve’s impersonation attack. Furthermore, we compare the MDI MQEA with other existing QEA schemes
Vorheriger Artikel Criteria for partial entanglement of three qubit states arising from distributive rules
Nächster Artikel Three-party semi-quantum protocol for deterministic secure quantum dialogue based on GHZ states

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Ljunggren, D., Bourennane, M., Karlsson, A.: Authority-based user authentication in quantum key distribution. Phys. Rev. A 62(2), 022305 (2000)ADSCrossRef
2.
Zhou, N., Zeng, G., Zeng, W., Zhu, F.: Cross-center quantum identification scheme based on teleportation and entanglement swapping. Opt. Commun. 254(4–6), 380–388 (2005)ADSCrossRef
3.
Shi, W.-M., Zhou, Y.-H., Yang, Y.-G.: Quantum deniable authentication protocol. Quantum Inf. Process. 13(7), 1501–1510 (2014)ADSMathSciNetCrossRef
4.
Kang, M.-S., Hong, C.-H., Heo, J., Lim, J.-I., Yang, H.-J.: Controlled mutual quantum entity authentication using entanglement swapping. Chin. Phys. B 24(9), 090306 (2015)CrossRef
5.
Huang, W., Xu, B.-J., Duan, J.-T., Liu, B., Su, Q., He, Y.-H., Jia, H.-Y.: Authenticated quantum key distribution with collective detection using single photons. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 55(10), 4238–4256 (2016)CrossRef
6.
Hong, C.-h, Heo, J., Jang, J.-G., Kwon, D.: Quantum identity authentication with single photon. Quantum Inf. Process. 16(10), 236 (2017)ADSMathSciNetCrossRef
7.
Kang, M.-S., Heo, J., Hong, C.-h, Yang, H.-J., Han, S.-W., Moon, S.: Controlled mutual quantum entity authentication with an untrusted third party. Quantum Inf. Process. 17(7), 159 (2018)ADSMathSciNetCrossRef
8.
Wang, Q., Zhang, S., Wang, S.-l, Shi, R.-h: Comment on “controlled mutual quantum entity authentication with an untrusted third party.” Quantum Inf. Process. 19(4), 125 (2020)ADSMathSciNetCrossRef
9.
Kang, M.-S., Heo, J., Hong, C.-h, Yang, H.-J., Han, M.S., Moon, S., Han, S.-W.: Response to “comment on ‘controlled mutual quantum entity authentication with an untrusted third party.’” Quantum Inf. Process. 19(4), 124 (2020)ADSMathSciNetCrossRef
10.
Choi, J.-W., Kang, M.-S., Heo, J., Hong, C.-h, Yoon, C.-S., Han, S.-W., Moon, S., Yang, H.-J.: Quantum challenge-response identification using single qubit unitary operators. Physica Scr. 95(10), 105104 (2020)ADSCrossRef
11.
Zhang, S., et al.: A novel quantum identity authentication based on Bell states. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 59(1), 236–249 (2020)MathSciNetCrossRef
12.
Makarov, V., Anisimov, A., Skaar, J.: Effects of detector efficiency mismatch on security of quantum cryptosystems. Phys. Rev. A 74(2), 022313 (2006)ADSCrossRef
13.
Lydersen, L., Wiechers, C., Wittmann, C., Elser, D., Skaar, J., Makarov, V.: Hacking commercial quantum cryptography systems by tailored bright illumination. Nat. Photonics 4(10), 686 (2010)ADSCrossRef
14.
Gerhardt, I., Liu, Q., Lamas-Linares, A., Skaar, J., Kurtsiefer, C., Makarov, V.: Full-field implementation of a perfect eavesdropper on a quantum cryptography system. Nat. Commun. 2(1), 349 (2011)ADSCrossRef
15.
Jain, N., Wittmann, C., Lydersen, L., Wiechers, C., Elser, D., Marquardt, C., Makarov, V., Leuchs, G.: Device calibration impacts security of quantum key distribution. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107(11), 110501 (2011)ADSCrossRef
16.
Weier, H., Krauss, H., Rau, M., Fürst, M., Nauerth, S., Weinfurter, H.: Quantum eavesdropping without interception: an attack exploiting the dead time of single-photon detectors. New J. Phys. 13(7), 073024 (2011)ADSCrossRef
17.
Wiechers, C., Lydersen, L., Wittmann, C., Elser, D., Skaar, J., Marquardt, C., Makarov, V., Leuchs, G.: After-gate attack on a quantum cryptosystem. New J. Phys. 13(1), 013043 (2011)ADSCrossRef
18.
Bugge, A.N., Sauge, S., Ghazali, A.M.M., Skaar, J., Lydersen, L., Makarov, V.: Laser damage helps the eavesdropper in quantum cryptography. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112(7), 070503 (2014)ADSCrossRef
19.
Makarov, V., Bourgoin, J.-P., Chaiwongkhot, P., Gagné, M., Jennewein, T., Kaiser, S., Kashyap, R., Legré, M., Minshull, C., Sajeed, S.: Creation of backdoors in quantum communications via laser damage. Phys. Rev. A 94(3), 030302 (2016)ADSCrossRef
20.
Lee, M.-S., Woo, M.-K., Jung, J., Kim, Y.-S., Han, S.-W., Moon, S.: Free-space QKD system hacking by wavelength control using an external laser. Opt. Express 25(10), 11124–11131 (2017)ADSCrossRef
21.
Lee, M.-S., Woo, M.-K., Kim, Y.-S., Cho, Y.-W., Han, S.-W., Moon, S.: Quantum hacking on a free-space quantum key distribution system without measuring quantum signals. JOSA B 36(3), B77–B82 (2019)CrossRef
22.
Lo, H.-K., Curty, M., Qi, B.: Measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108(13), 130503 (2012)ADSCrossRef
23.
Puthoor, I.V., Amiri, R., Wallden, P., Curty, M., Andersson, E.: Measurement-device-independent quantum digital signatures. Phys. Rev. A 94(2), 022328 (2016)ADSMathSciNetCrossRef
24.
Tang, Y.-L., Yin, H.-L., Zhao, Q., Liu, H., Sun, X.-X., Huang, M.-Q., Zhang, W.-J., Chen, S.-J., Zhang, L., You, L.-X.: Measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution over untrustful metropolitan network. Phys. Rev. X 6(1), 011024 (2016)
25.
Choi, Y.-j, Kwon, O.-s, Woo, M.-K., Oh, K.-h, Han, S.-W., Kim, Y.-S., Moon, S.: Plug-and-play measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution. Phys. Rev. A 93(3), 032319 (2016)ADSCrossRef
26.
Roberts, G., Lucamarini, M., Yuan, Z., Dynes, J., Comandar, L., Sharpe, A., Shields, A., Curty, M., Puthoor, I., Andersson, E.: Experimental measurement-device-independent quantum digital signatures. Nat. Commun. 8(1), 1–7 (2017)CrossRef
27.
28.
Park, Ch., Woo, M.K., Park, B.K., Lee, M.S., Kim, Y.-S., Cho, Y.-W., Kim, Y.-S., Han, S.-W., Moon, S.: Practical plug-and-play measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution with polarization division multiplexing. IEEE Access 6, 58587–58593 (2018)CrossRef
29.
Niu, P.-H., Zhou, Z.-R., Lin, Z.-S., Sheng, Y.-B., Yin, L.-G., Long, G.-L.: Measurement-device-independent quantum communication without encryption. Sci. Bull. 63(20), 1345–1350 (2018)CrossRef
30.
Liang, W., Xue, Q., Jiao, R.: The performance of three-intensity decoy-state measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution. Quantum Inf. Process. 19, 1–9 (2020)MathSciNetCrossRef
31.
Lo, H.-K., Preskill, J.: Security of quantum key distribution using weak coherent states with nonrandom phases. Quantum Inf. Comput. 7(5 & 6), 431–458 (2007)MathSciNetMATH
32.
Divochiy, A., et al.: Superconducting nanowire photon-number-resolving detector at telecommunication wavelengths. Nat. Photonics 2(5), 302–306 (2008)CrossRef
33.
Kardynał, B.E., Yuan, Z.L., Shields, A.J.: An avalanche-photodiode-based photon-number-resolving detector. Nat. Photon. 2(7), 425–428 (2008)CrossRef
34.
Kok, P., Munro, W.J., Nemoto, K., Ralph, T.C., Dowling, J.P., Milburn, G.J.: Linear optical quantum computing with photonic qubits. Rev. Mod. Phys. 79(1), 135 (2007)ADSCrossRef
35.
Kok, P.: Photonic quantum information processing. Contemp. Phys. 57(4), 526–544 (2016)ADSCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Measurement-device-independent mutual quantum entity authentication
verfasst von
Ji-Woong Choi
Min-Sung Kang
Chang Hoon Park
Hyung-Jin Yang
Sang-Wook Han
Publikationsdatum
01.04.2021
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Quantum Information Processing / Ausgabe 4/2021
Print ISSN: 1570-0755
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-1332
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11128-021-03093-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2021

Quantum Information Processing 4/2021 Zur Ausgabe

OriginalPaper

Quantum k-means algorithm based on trusted server in quantum cloud computing

OriginalPaper

Quantum k-uniform states for heterogeneous systems from irredundant mixed orthogonal arrays

OriginalPaper

Multi-mode plug-and-play dual-phase-modulated continuous-variable quantum key distribution

OriginalPaper

Criteria for partial entanglement of three qubit states arising from distributive rules

OriginalPaper

Optimizing the decoy-state BB84 QKD protocol parameters

OriginalPaper

Entanglement-assisted Reed–Solomon codes over qudits: theory and architecture

Neuer Inhalt

    Bildnachweise