Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Nanoparticle Research 12/2012

01.12.2012 | Perspectives

Nanotechnology patenting trends through an environmental lens: analysis of materials and applications

verfasst von: Megan E. Leitch, Elizabeth Casman, Gregory V. Lowry

Erschienen in: Journal of Nanoparticle Research | Ausgabe 12/2012

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Many international groups study environmental health and safety (EHS) concerns surrounding the use of engineered nanomaterials (ENMs). These researchers frequently use the “Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies” (PEN) inventory of nano-enabled consumer products to prioritize types of ENMs to study because estimates of life-cycle ENM releases to the environment can be extrapolated from the database. An alternative “snapshot” of nanomaterials likely to enter commerce can be determined from the patent literature. The goal of this research was to provide an overview of nanotechnology intellectual property trends, complementary to the PEN consumer product database, to help identify potentially “risky” nanomaterials for study by the nano-EHS community. Ten years of nanotechnology patents were examined to determine the types of nano-functional materials being patented, the chemical compositions of the ENMs, and the products in which they are likely to appear. Patenting trends indicated different distributions of nano-enabled products and materials compared to the PEN database. Recent nanotechnology patenting is dominated by electrical and information technology applications rather than the hygienic and anti-fouling applications shown by PEN. There is an increasing emphasis on patenting of nano-scale layers, coatings, and other surface modifications rather than traditional nanoparticles, and there is widespread use of nano-functional semiconductor, ceramic, magnetic, and biological materials that are currently less studied by EHS professionals. These commonly patented products and the nano-functional materials they contain may warrant life-cycle evaluations to determine the potential for environmental exposure and toxicity. The patent and consumer product lists contribute different and complementary insights into the emerging nanotechnology industry and its potential for introducing nanomaterials into the environment.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Fußnoten
1
Nanotechnology researchers have also used forward and backward citations to determine the relationship between academic and patent literature, particularly to show knowledge-sharing trends. (Finardi 2011; Igami 2008; Li et al. 2009; Wang and Guan 2011; Zucker et al. 2007). Inclusion of bibliometric analyses is also valuable to map the emerging nanotechnology field, i.e., its interdisciplinary, multidisciplinary or “general purpose” nature (Igami 2008; Schultz and Joutz 2010; Youtie et al. 2007).
 
2
A network was also created for the USPTO 2010 Applications dataset, but clustering was so similar it did not warrant separate reporting.
 
3
Parenthetically, the 10,000-word abstract vectors for the materials analysis are rich in mineable information; modern machine-learning researchers commonly employ hierarchical clustering or classification methods to word vectors to find common themes and evaluate relationships between documents. In this study, simple hierarchical clustering of the patent abstract word vectors was attempted to learn product/process trends, but results were not adequate to categorize inventions by their purpose or usage. A state-of-the-art algorithm would be required to interpret patent text in this way; therefore, the readily available IPC was used instead. There is minor risk associated with this study’s reliance on third-party invention classifications rather than unbiased text-mining algorithms. Though the inventors and examiners are field experts and should therefore make few if any unintentional errors in their IPC assignments, hidden agendas could exist behind the assignment of a given invention to one or more IPC categories, whether to increase scope of the claim or avoid the appearance of infringement. We have accepted these risks because using the IPC provided more relevant and granular information than our simple algorithms.
 
4
Examples of more specific product or technology types belonging in each broad Section-Level are revealed in the following IPC Class and SubClass analyses. A table with this information is also provided in the Supplementary Material.
 
5
A table showing absolute counts of IPC Subclasses assigned to 2006–2010 USPTO Applications is presented in the Supplementary Material.
 
6
There are very few published studies data-mining for material usage trends in nanotechnology patents or journals, and those that exist tend to explore single technology fields, such as Menéndez-Manjón’s (Menéndez-Manjón et al. 2011) analysis of nano-energy applications. To our knowledge, design of a sophisticated text-mining algorithm for characterization of nano-scale materials described in academic and IP literature, excluding non-nano materials, has not yet been achieved in any published study. This algorithm, if it existed, would be valuable for cataloging common and emergent material characteristics of ENPs only, not the full product/invention. Creation of such an algorithm, however, was beyond the scope of this study.
 
7
Between 2001 and 2011, the annual percentage of nanotechnology inventions which contain nanotubes increased significantly in both the Applications and Patent datasets (R 2 for linear and quadratic regressions range between 0.85 and 0.96 with P values between 0.038 and 3E−6). Regressions are provided in the Supplementary Material.
 
8
Listed elements are 25 or more “ranks” higher than their earth abundance.
 
9
One limitation of the binary element tallying method is that stoichiometric composition of molecules is not accounted for when summing element frequencies. For example, biological molecules appearing in patent abstracts contain more carbon than nitrogen, sulfur and phosphorus, however, each element is counted the same. This led to a boost in ranking for N, S and P, however, ranking of non-biological elements were relatively unaffected by trial inclusion of stoichiometry.
 
10
The entire FR diagram, showing all vertices (elements appearing in USPTO 2000–2011 Nanotechnology Grants dataset) and all edges (co-occurrences in the same abstract) is supplied in the Supplementary Material along with an element co-occurrence matrix. Without filters, the data are too cluttered to draw case-by-case conclusions about elements’ association with each other but do display tight clustering of element types. Detailed diagrams and matrices such as these, though unfit for concise presentation in a journal article, could be of interest to nano-toxicologists determining relevant mixtures of elements to test.
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Alencar M, Porter A (2007) Nanopatenting patterns in relation to product life cycle. Technol Forecast Soc 74:1661–1680CrossRef Alencar M, Porter A (2007) Nanopatenting patterns in relation to product life cycle. Technol Forecast Soc 74:1661–1680CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Allison JR, Lemley MA, Moore KA, Trunkey RD (2004) Valuable patents. Georgetown Law J 92:435–479 Allison JR, Lemley MA, Moore KA, Trunkey RD (2004) Valuable patents. Georgetown Law J 92:435–479
Zurück zum Zitat Andersen MM (2011) Silent innovation: corporate strategizing in early nanotechnology evolution. J Technol Transf 36:680–696CrossRef Andersen MM (2011) Silent innovation: corporate strategizing in early nanotechnology evolution. J Technol Transf 36:680–696CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bass SD, Kurgan La (2009) Discovery of factors influencing patent value based on machine learning in patents in the field of nanotechnology. Scientometrics 82:217–241CrossRef Bass SD, Kurgan La (2009) Discovery of factors influencing patent value based on machine learning in patents in the field of nanotechnology. Scientometrics 82:217–241CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bawa R (2004) Nanotechnology patenting in the US. Nanotechnol Law Bus 1:1–21 Bawa R (2004) Nanotechnology patenting in the US. Nanotechnol Law Bus 1:1–21
Zurück zum Zitat Branstetter L (2001) Are knowledge spillovers international or intranational in scope? Microeconometric evidence from the US and Japan. J Int Econ 53:53–79CrossRef Branstetter L (2001) Are knowledge spillovers international or intranational in scope? Microeconometric evidence from the US and Japan. J Int Econ 53:53–79CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Brouwer E, Kleinknecht A (1999) Innovative output, and a firm’s propensity to patent. An exploration of CIS micro data. Res Policy 28:615–624CrossRef Brouwer E, Kleinknecht A (1999) Innovative output, and a firm’s propensity to patent. An exploration of CIS micro data. Res Policy 28:615–624CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Chen H, Roco MC, Li X, Lin Y (2008) Trends in nanotechnology patents. Nat Nanotechnol 3:123–125CrossRef Chen H, Roco MC, Li X, Lin Y (2008) Trends in nanotechnology patents. Nat Nanotechnol 3:123–125CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cohen W, Nelson R, Walsh J (2000) Protecting their intellectual assets: appropriability conditions and why U.S. manufacturing firms patent (or Not). NBER Working Paper 7552, Cambridge, MA Cohen W, Nelson R, Walsh J (2000) Protecting their intellectual assets: appropriability conditions and why U.S. manufacturing firms patent (or Not). NBER Working Paper 7552, Cambridge, MA
Zurück zum Zitat Dang Y, Zhang Y, Fan L et al (2010) Trends in worldwide nanotechnology patent applications: 1991 to 2008. J Nanopart Res 12:687–706CrossRef Dang Y, Zhang Y, Fan L et al (2010) Trends in worldwide nanotechnology patent applications: 1991 to 2008. J Nanopart Res 12:687–706CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Eckelman MJ, Zimmerman JB, Anastas PT (2008) Toward green nano. J Ind Ecol 12:316–328CrossRef Eckelman MJ, Zimmerman JB, Anastas PT (2008) Toward green nano. J Ind Ecol 12:316–328CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fabrega J, Luoma SN, Tyler CR et al (2011) Silver nanoparticles: behaviour and effects in the aquatic environment. Environ Int 37:517–531CrossRef Fabrega J, Luoma SN, Tyler CR et al (2011) Silver nanoparticles: behaviour and effects in the aquatic environment. Environ Int 37:517–531CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fernández-ribas A (2010) International patent strategies of small and large firms: an empirical study of nanotechnology. Rev Policy Res 27:457–473CrossRef Fernández-ribas A (2010) International patent strategies of small and large firms: an empirical study of nanotechnology. Rev Policy Res 27:457–473CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fifarek BJ, Veloso FM, Davidson CI (2008) Offshoring technology innovation: a case study of rare-earth technology. J Oper Manag 26:222–238CrossRef Fifarek BJ, Veloso FM, Davidson CI (2008) Offshoring technology innovation: a case study of rare-earth technology. J Oper Manag 26:222–238CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Finardi U (2011) Time relations between scientific production and patenting of knowledge: the case of nanotechnologies. Scientometrics 89:37–50CrossRef Finardi U (2011) Time relations between scientific production and patenting of knowledge: the case of nanotechnologies. Scientometrics 89:37–50CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gort M, Klepper S (1982) Time paths in the diffusion of product innovations. Econ J 92:630–653CrossRef Gort M, Klepper S (1982) Time paths in the diffusion of product innovations. Econ J 92:630–653CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gottschalk F, Sonderer T, Scholz RW, Nowack B (2009) Modeled environmental concentrations of engineered nanomaterials (TiO(2), ZnO, Ag, CNT, fullerenes) for different regions. Environ Sci Technol 43:9216–9222CrossRef Gottschalk F, Sonderer T, Scholz RW, Nowack B (2009) Modeled environmental concentrations of engineered nanomaterials (TiO(2), ZnO, Ag, CNT, fullerenes) for different regions. Environ Sci Technol 43:9216–9222CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gottschalk F, Scholz RW, Nowack B (2010) Probabilistic material flow modeling for assessing the environmental exposure to compounds: methodology and an application to engineered nano-TiO2 particles. Environ Modell Softw 25:320–332CrossRef Gottschalk F, Scholz RW, Nowack B (2010) Probabilistic material flow modeling for assessing the environmental exposure to compounds: methodology and an application to engineered nano-TiO2 particles. Environ Modell Softw 25:320–332CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Griliches Z (1990) Patent statistics as economic indicators: a survey. J Econ Lit 28:1661–1707 Griliches Z (1990) Patent statistics as economic indicators: a survey. J Econ Lit 28:1661–1707
Zurück zum Zitat Grimpe C, Patuelli R (2009) Regional knowledge production in nanomaterials: a spatial filtering approach. Ann Regional Sci 46:519–541CrossRef Grimpe C, Patuelli R (2009) Regional knowledge production in nanomaterials: a spatial filtering approach. Ann Regional Sci 46:519–541CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Grupp H, Schmoch U (1999) Patent statistics in the age of globalisation: new legal procedures, new analytical methods, new economic interpretation. Res Policy 28:377–396CrossRef Grupp H, Schmoch U (1999) Patent statistics in the age of globalisation: new legal procedures, new analytical methods, new economic interpretation. Res Policy 28:377–396CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hall M, Frank E, Holmes G et al (2009) The WEKA data mining software: an update. SIGKDD Explor 11:10–18CrossRef Hall M, Frank E, Holmes G et al (2009) The WEKA data mining software: an update. SIGKDD Explor 11:10–18CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hall BH, Jaffe A, Trajtenberg M (2011) Market value and patent citations. Rand J Econ 36:16–38 Hall BH, Jaffe A, Trajtenberg M (2011) Market value and patent citations. Rand J Econ 36:16–38
Zurück zum Zitat Hansen D, Shneiderman B, Smith MA (2010) Analyzing social media networks with NodeXL: insights from a connected world, 1st edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam Hansen D, Shneiderman B, Smith MA (2010) Analyzing social media networks with NodeXL: insights from a connected world, 1st edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam
Zurück zum Zitat Holdren JP (2011) Nanotechnology regulation and oversight principles. National Academic Press, Washington DC Holdren JP (2011) Nanotechnology regulation and oversight principles. National Academic Press, Washington DC
Zurück zum Zitat Huang Z, Chen HC, Yip A et al (2003) Longitudinal patent analysis for nanoscale science and engineering: country, institution and technology field. J Nanopart Res 5:333–363CrossRef Huang Z, Chen HC, Yip A et al (2003) Longitudinal patent analysis for nanoscale science and engineering: country, institution and technology field. J Nanopart Res 5:333–363CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Huang Z, Chen HC, Chen ZK, Roco MC (2004) International nanotechnology development in 2003: country, institution, and technology field analysis based on USPTO patent database. J Nanopart Res 6:325–354CrossRef Huang Z, Chen HC, Chen ZK, Roco MC (2004) International nanotechnology development in 2003: country, institution, and technology field analysis based on USPTO patent database. J Nanopart Res 6:325–354CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hullmann A (2006) Who is winning the global nanorace? Nat Nanotechnol 1:81–83CrossRef Hullmann A (2006) Who is winning the global nanorace? Nat Nanotechnol 1:81–83CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Igami M (2008) Exploration of the evolution of nanotechnology via mapping of patent applications. Scientometrics 77:289–308CrossRef Igami M (2008) Exploration of the evolution of nanotechnology via mapping of patent applications. Scientometrics 77:289–308CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Islam N (2010) An empirical analysis of nanotechnology research domains. Technovation 30:229–237CrossRef Islam N (2010) An empirical analysis of nanotechnology research domains. Technovation 30:229–237CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Johnston HJ, Hutchison G, Christensen FM et al (2010) A review of the in vivo and in vitro toxicity of silver and gold particulates: particle attributes and biological mechanisms responsible for the observed toxicity. CRC Crit Rev Toxicol 40:328–346CrossRef Johnston HJ, Hutchison G, Christensen FM et al (2010) A review of the in vivo and in vitro toxicity of silver and gold particulates: particle attributes and biological mechanisms responsible for the observed toxicity. CRC Crit Rev Toxicol 40:328–346CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Klaine SJ, Koelmans AA, Horne N et al (2012) Paradigms to assess the environmental impact of manufactured nanomaterials. Environ Toxicol Chem 31:3–14CrossRef Klaine SJ, Koelmans AA, Horne N et al (2012) Paradigms to assess the environmental impact of manufactured nanomaterials. Environ Toxicol Chem 31:3–14CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kostoff RN, Stump JA, Johnson D et al (2006) The structure and infrastructure of the global nanotechnology literature. J Nanopart Res 8:301–321CrossRef Kostoff RN, Stump JA, Johnson D et al (2006) The structure and infrastructure of the global nanotechnology literature. J Nanopart Res 8:301–321CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kostoff RN, Koytcheff RG, Lau CGY (2007) Technical structure of the global nanoscience and nanotechnology literature. J Nanopart Res 9:701–724 Kostoff RN, Koytcheff RG, Lau CGY (2007) Technical structure of the global nanoscience and nanotechnology literature. J Nanopart Res 9:701–724
Zurück zum Zitat Kryder M (2009) After hard drives—what comes next? IEEE T Magn 45:3406–3413CrossRef Kryder M (2009) After hard drives—what comes next? IEEE T Magn 45:3406–3413CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lemley MA (2001) Rational ignorance at the patent office. Northwest Univ Law Rev 95:1495–1532 Lemley MA (2001) Rational ignorance at the patent office. Northwest Univ Law Rev 95:1495–1532
Zurück zum Zitat Lemley MA (2005) Patenting nanotechnology. Stanford Law Rev 58:601–630 Lemley MA (2005) Patenting nanotechnology. Stanford Law Rev 58:601–630
Zurück zum Zitat Levard C, Hotze EM, Lowry GV, Brown GE (2012) Environmental transformations of silver nanoparticles: impact on stability and toxicity. Environ Sci Technol 46:6901–6914CrossRef Levard C, Hotze EM, Lowry GV, Brown GE (2012) Environmental transformations of silver nanoparticles: impact on stability and toxicity. Environ Sci Technol 46:6901–6914CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Li X, Lin Y, Chen H, Roco MC (2007) Worldwide nanotechnology development: a comparative study of USPTO, EPO, and JPO patents (1976–2004). J Nanopart Res 9:977–1002CrossRef Li X, Lin Y, Chen H, Roco MC (2007) Worldwide nanotechnology development: a comparative study of USPTO, EPO, and JPO patents (1976–2004). J Nanopart Res 9:977–1002CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Li X, Hu D, Dang Y et al (2009) Nano mapper: an internet knowledge mapping system for nanotechnology development. J Nanopart Res 11:529–552CrossRef Li X, Hu D, Dang Y et al (2009) Nano mapper: an internet knowledge mapping system for nanotechnology development. J Nanopart Res 11:529–552CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lide DR (2005) The CRC handbook of chemistry and physics, 85th edn. Section 14, Geophysics, astronomy, and acoustics. CRC Press, Boca Raton Lide DR (2005) The CRC handbook of chemistry and physics, 85th edn. Section 14, Geophysics, astronomy, and acoustics. CRC Press, Boca Raton
Zurück zum Zitat Liu X, Zhang P, Li X et al (2009) Trends for nanotechnology development in China, Russia, and India. J Nanopart Res 11:1845–1866CrossRef Liu X, Zhang P, Li X et al (2009) Trends for nanotechnology development in China, Russia, and India. J Nanopart Res 11:1845–1866CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lowry GV, Espinasse BP, Badireddy AR et al (2012) Long-term transformation and fate of manufactured Ag nanoparticles in a simulated large scale freshwater emergent wetland. Environ Sci Technol 46:7027–7036CrossRef Lowry GV, Espinasse BP, Badireddy AR et al (2012) Long-term transformation and fate of manufactured Ag nanoparticles in a simulated large scale freshwater emergent wetland. Environ Sci Technol 46:7027–7036CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Maghrebi M, Abbasi A, Amiri S et al (2010) A collective and abridged lexical query for delineation of nanotechnology publications. Scientometrics 86:15–25CrossRef Maghrebi M, Abbasi A, Amiri S et al (2010) A collective and abridged lexical query for delineation of nanotechnology publications. Scientometrics 86:15–25CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Makker A (2011) The nanotechnology patent thicket and the path to commercialization. South Calif Law Rev 84:1163–1203 Makker A (2011) The nanotechnology patent thicket and the path to commercialization. South Calif Law Rev 84:1163–1203
Zurück zum Zitat Marambio-Jones C, Hoek EMV (2010) A review of the antibacterial effects of silver nanomaterials and potential implications for human health and the environment. J Nanopart Res 12:1531–1551CrossRef Marambio-Jones C, Hoek EMV (2010) A review of the antibacterial effects of silver nanomaterials and potential implications for human health and the environment. J Nanopart Res 12:1531–1551CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Menéndez-Manjón A, Moldenhauer K, Wagener P, Barcikowski S (2011) Nano-energy research trends: bibliometrical analysis of nanotechnology research in the energy sector. J Nanopart Res 13:3911–3922CrossRef Menéndez-Manjón A, Moldenhauer K, Wagener P, Barcikowski S (2011) Nano-energy research trends: bibliometrical analysis of nanotechnology research in the energy sector. J Nanopart Res 13:3911–3922CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Meyer M, Debackere K, Glänzel W (2010) Can applied science be “good science”? Exploring the relationship between patent citations and citation impact in nanoscience. Scientometrics 85:527–539CrossRef Meyer M, Debackere K, Glänzel W (2010) Can applied science be “good science”? Exploring the relationship between patent citations and citation impact in nanoscience. Scientometrics 85:527–539CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Money ES, Reckhow KH, Wiesner MR (2012) The use of Bayesian networks for nanoparticle risk forecasting: model formulation and baseline evaluation. Sci Total Environ 426:436–445CrossRef Money ES, Reckhow KH, Wiesner MR (2012) The use of Bayesian networks for nanoparticle risk forecasting: model formulation and baseline evaluation. Sci Total Environ 426:436–445CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mueller NC, Nowack B (2008) Exposure modeling of engineered nanoparticles in the environment. Environ Sci Technol 42:4447–4453CrossRef Mueller NC, Nowack B (2008) Exposure modeling of engineered nanoparticles in the environment. Environ Sci Technol 42:4447–4453CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Pakes A, Schankerman M (1984) The rate of obsolescence of patents, research gestation lags, and the private rate of return to research resources. In: Griliches Z (ed) R & D, patents, and productivity. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 73–88 Pakes A, Schankerman M (1984) The rate of obsolescence of patents, research gestation lags, and the private rate of return to research resources. In: Griliches Z (ed) R & D, patents, and productivity. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 73–88
Zurück zum Zitat Porter AL, Youtie J, Shapira P, Schoeneck DJ (2007) Refining search terms for nanotechnology. J Nanopart Res 10:715–728CrossRef Porter AL, Youtie J, Shapira P, Schoeneck DJ (2007) Refining search terms for nanotechnology. J Nanopart Res 10:715–728CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Powell J (2008) The quantum limit to Moore’s law. Proc IEEE Micr Elect 96:1247–1248 Powell J (2008) The quantum limit to Moore’s law. Proc IEEE Micr Elect 96:1247–1248
Zurück zum Zitat Robichaud CO, Uyar AE, Darby MR et al (2009) Estimates of upper bounds and trends in nano-TiO(2) production as a basis for exposure assessment. Environ Sci Technol 43:4227–4233CrossRef Robichaud CO, Uyar AE, Darby MR et al (2009) Estimates of upper bounds and trends in nano-TiO(2) production as a basis for exposure assessment. Environ Sci Technol 43:4227–4233CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rocks S, Pollard S, Dorey R et al (2009) Risk assessment of manufactured nanomaterials. In: Lead J, Smith E (eds) Environmental and human health impacts of nanotechnology. Wiley, Hoboken, pp 389–421CrossRef Rocks S, Pollard S, Dorey R et al (2009) Risk assessment of manufactured nanomaterials. In: Lead J, Smith E (eds) Environmental and human health impacts of nanotechnology. Wiley, Hoboken, pp 389–421CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Roco MC, Harthorn B, Guston D, Shapira P (2011) Innovative and responsible governance of nanotechnology for societal development. J Nanopart Res 13:3557–3590CrossRef Roco MC, Harthorn B, Guston D, Shapira P (2011) Innovative and responsible governance of nanotechnology for societal development. J Nanopart Res 13:3557–3590CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Schultz LI, Joutz FL (2010) Methods for identifying emerging general purpose technologies: a case study of nanotechnologies. Scientometrics 85:155–170CrossRef Schultz LI, Joutz FL (2010) Methods for identifying emerging general purpose technologies: a case study of nanotechnologies. Scientometrics 85:155–170CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Som C, Wick P, Krug H, Nowack B (2011) Environmental and health effects of nanomaterials in nanotextiles and façade coatings. Environ Int 37:1131–1142CrossRef Som C, Wick P, Krug H, Nowack B (2011) Environmental and health effects of nanomaterials in nanotextiles and façade coatings. Environ Int 37:1131–1142CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Takeda Y, Mae S, Kajikawa Y, Matsushima K (2009) Nanobiotechnology as an emerging research domain from nanotechnology: a bibliometric approach. Scientometrics 80:25–38CrossRef Takeda Y, Mae S, Kajikawa Y, Matsushima K (2009) Nanobiotechnology as an emerging research domain from nanotechnology: a bibliometric approach. Scientometrics 80:25–38CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Trajtenberg M (1990) A penny for your quotes—patent citations and the value of innovations. Rand J Econ 21:172–187CrossRef Trajtenberg M (1990) A penny for your quotes—patent citations and the value of innovations. Rand J Econ 21:172–187CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat USPTO (2012) United States Patent and Trademark Office. In: US Department of Commerce. www.uspto.gov. Accessed 30 Nov 2011 USPTO (2012) United States Patent and Trademark Office. In: US Department of Commerce. www.​uspto.​gov. Accessed 30 Nov 2011
Zurück zum Zitat Wang G, Guan J (2011) Measuring science–technology interactions using patent citations and author-inventor links: an exploration analysis from Chinese nanotechnology. J Nanopart Res 13:6245–6262CrossRef Wang G, Guan J (2011) Measuring science–technology interactions using patent citations and author-inventor links: an exploration analysis from Chinese nanotechnology. J Nanopart Res 13:6245–6262CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wiesner MR, Lowry GV, Jones KL et al (2009) Decreasing uncertainties in assessing environmental exposure, risk, and ecological implications of nanomaterials. Environ Sci Technol 43:6458–6462CrossRef Wiesner MR, Lowry GV, Jones KL et al (2009) Decreasing uncertainties in assessing environmental exposure, risk, and ecological implications of nanomaterials. Environ Sci Technol 43:6458–6462CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wijnhoven SWP, Herberts CA, Heugens EHW et al (2009) Nano-silver—a review of available data and knowledge gaps in human and environmental risk assessment. Nanotoxicology 3:109–138CrossRef Wijnhoven SWP, Herberts CA, Heugens EHW et al (2009) Nano-silver—a review of available data and knowledge gaps in human and environmental risk assessment. Nanotoxicology 3:109–138CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wohlleben W, Brill S, Meier MW et al (2011) On the lifecycle of nanocomposites: comparing released fragments and their in vivo hazards from three release mechanisms and four nanocomposites. Small 7:2384–2395CrossRef Wohlleben W, Brill S, Meier MW et al (2011) On the lifecycle of nanocomposites: comparing released fragments and their in vivo hazards from three release mechanisms and four nanocomposites. Small 7:2384–2395CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Youtie J, Iacopetta M, Graham S (2007) Assessing the nature of nanotechnology: can we uncover an emerging general purpose technology? J Technol Transf 33:315–329CrossRef Youtie J, Iacopetta M, Graham S (2007) Assessing the nature of nanotechnology: can we uncover an emerging general purpose technology? J Technol Transf 33:315–329CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Zucker LG, Darby MR, Furner J et al (2007) Minerva unbound: knowledge stocks, knowledge flows and new knowledge production. Res Policy 36:850–863CrossRef Zucker LG, Darby MR, Furner J et al (2007) Minerva unbound: knowledge stocks, knowledge flows and new knowledge production. Res Policy 36:850–863CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Nanotechnology patenting trends through an environmental lens: analysis of materials and applications
verfasst von
Megan E. Leitch
Elizabeth Casman
Gregory V. Lowry
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2012
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Journal of Nanoparticle Research / Ausgabe 12/2012
Print ISSN: 1388-0764
Elektronische ISSN: 1572-896X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-012-1283-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 12/2012

Journal of Nanoparticle Research 12/2012 Zur Ausgabe

    Marktübersichten

    Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen.