Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery 10/2022

10.01.2022 | Original Article

New performance correlations of municipal solid waste gasification for sustainable syngas fuel production

verfasst von: Amira Nemmour, Abrar Inayat, Isam Janajreh, Chaouki Ghenai

Erschienen in: Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery | Ausgabe 10/2022

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Municipal solid waste (MSW) is one of the most important carbonaceous solid waste collected by the municipality that includes residential, industrial, institutional, commercial and construction waste. In this work, modelling and simulation analyses using ASPEN plus simulation software integrated with response surface methodology (RSM)-based optimization method are used to investigate the performance of MSW gasification process. The principal objective is to develop new correlations for the key performance indicators of MSW gasification (hydrogen H2 and carbon monoxide CO contents in the syngas, cold gasification efficiency CGE, and carbon conversion CC) versus three main input factors (gasification temperature 600–1000 \(^\circ{\rm C}\), equivalence ratio 0.1–0.5, and oxygen content in air 21–100%). The MSW gasification model was developed using Aspen Plus and the results were validated with experimental data. The comparison showed a good agreement between the simulation and experimental results. RSM based on central composite design (CCD) and analysis of variance (ANOVA) were used to optimize the MSW gasification process. New correlations for the output variable (H2, CO, CGE, and CC) of the gasification process were presented by second-order polynomial equations. The results showed that the coefficients of determination \({R}^{2}\) for the predicted model for H2, CO, CGE, and CC were respectively 0.9913, 0.9630, 0.9618 and 0.9730 (high accuracy of the new proposed correlations or the regression models). The optimized gasifier operating parameters to maximize the H2, CO, CGE, and CC are T = 1000 \(^\circ{\rm C}\), ER = 0.132 and oxygen = 100%. The optimum values for the H2, CO, CGE, and CC are 44.86%, 53.8%, 95.04%, and 79.96%, respectively. The results showed that the most significant factors affecting the H2, CO, CGE, and CC in order of importance are respectively gasification temperature, oxygen percentage and equivalence ratio.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Ahmad MI, Alauddin ZAZ, Soid SNM, Mohamed M, Rizman ZI, Rasat MSM, Razab MKAA, Amini MHM (2015) Performance and carbon efficiency analysis of biomass via stratified gasifier. ARPN J Eng Appl Sci 10(20):9533–9537 Ahmad MI, Alauddin ZAZ, Soid SNM, Mohamed M, Rizman ZI, Rasat MSM, Razab MKAA, Amini MHM (2015) Performance and carbon efficiency analysis of biomass via stratified gasifier. ARPN J Eng Appl Sci 10(20):9533–9537
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Ali Bahari and Kazem Atashkari JM (2020) multi-objective optimization of a municipal solid Mwaste gasifier. Biomass Convers Bioref Ali Bahari and Kazem Atashkari JM (2020) multi-objective optimization of a municipal solid Mwaste gasifier. Biomass Convers Bioref
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Fermoso J, Gil MV, Arias B, Plaza MG, Pevida C, Pis JJ, Rubiera F (2010) Application of response surface methodology to assess the combined effect of operating variables on high-pressure coal gasification for H2-rich gas production. Int J Hydrocarb Eng 35(3):1191–1204 Fermoso J, Gil MV, Arias B, Plaza MG, Pevida C, Pis JJ, Rubiera F (2010) Application of response surface methodology to assess the combined effect of operating variables on high-pressure coal gasification for H2-rich gas production. Int J Hydrocarb Eng 35(3):1191–1204
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Capareda S (2013) Introduction to biomass energy conversions (1st Edition. CRS press Capareda S (2013) Introduction to biomass energy conversions (1st Edition. CRS press
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Douglas C, Montgomery GCR (2002) Applied Statistics and Probability for Engineers (Jhon wiley & sons (Ed.); 3rd editio) Douglas C, Montgomery GCR (2002) Applied Statistics and Probability for Engineers (Jhon wiley & sons (Ed.); 3rd editio)
19.
Zurück zum Zitat João Cardoso VSDE (2019) Process optimization and robustness analysis of municipal solid waste gasification using air‐carbon dioxide mixtures as gasifying agent. Int J Energy Res João Cardoso VSDE (2019) Process optimization and robustness analysis of municipal solid waste gasification using air‐carbon dioxide mixtures as gasifying agent. Int J Energy Res
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Kumar GS (2017) Sensitivity analysis and optimization of parameters for the gasification of high ash Indian coal. 12(18):7184–7193 Kumar GS (2017) Sensitivity analysis and optimization of parameters for the gasification of high ash Indian coal. 12(18):7184–7193
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Mazzoni L, Almazrouei M, Ghenai C, Janajreh I (2017) ScienceDirect ScienceDirect ScienceDirect A comparison of energy recovery from MSW through plasma The 15th International Symposium on District Heating and Cooling gasification and entrained flow gasification Assessing the feasibility the heat temperature. Energy Proc 142:3480–3485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.12.233CrossRef Mazzoni L, Almazrouei M, Ghenai C, Janajreh I (2017) ScienceDirect ScienceDirect ScienceDirect A comparison of energy recovery from MSW through plasma The 15th International Symposium on District Heating and Cooling gasification and entrained flow gasification Assessing the feasibility the heat temperature. Energy Proc 142:3480–3485. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​egypro.​2017.​12.​233CrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Plus A, Properties A, Suite AE, Technology A, Park TC, Systems O, Technology A, Park TC (n.d.) Part Number : Aspen Physical Property System 11 . 1 September 2001 Plus A, Properties A, Suite AE, Technology A, Park TC, Systems O, Technology A, Park TC (n.d.) Part Number : Aspen Physical Property System 11 . 1 September 2001
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Ramarao M (2016) Evaluation of carbon conversion efficiency of mixed biomass gasification. 7(6), 555–564 Ramarao M (2016) Evaluation of carbon conversion efficiency of mixed biomass gasification. 7(6), 555–564
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Yu W, Sepehrnoori K (2014) An efficient reservoir-simulation approach to design and optimize unconventional gas production. March, 19–25 Yu W, Sepehrnoori K (2014) An efficient reservoir-simulation approach to design and optimize unconventional gas production. March, 19–25
Metadaten
Titel
New performance correlations of municipal solid waste gasification for sustainable syngas fuel production
verfasst von
Amira Nemmour
Abrar Inayat
Isam Janajreh
Chaouki Ghenai
Publikationsdatum
10.01.2022
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery / Ausgabe 10/2022
Print ISSN: 2190-6815
Elektronische ISSN: 2190-6823
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-021-02237-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 10/2022

Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery 10/2022 Zur Ausgabe

Editorial

Editorial