nach oben

Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance

Erschienen in:

13.12.2022 | Technical Article

Performance Study of 3D Printed Continuous Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Composites Using Taguchi Method

verfasst von: Anis A. Ansari, M. Kamil

Erschienen in: Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance | Ausgabe 21/2023

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Fused filament fabrication-based 3D printing technology is considered a new approach for manufacturing fiber-reinforced polymer parts due to proper control over fiber position and orientation within the polymer matrix. In this study, the performance of 3D printed composites of Onyx reinforced with continuous glass, Kevlar, and carbon fibers has been examined. The Markforged Mark Two 3D printer was used to develop tensile test specimens as per ASTM D638 standard. An L9 array of the Taguchi design of experiment is employed for experimentation. The effect of fiber type, fiber volume, fiber isotropic angle, and fiber concentric rings on tensile properties has been studied. After analysis of the results, it is observed that tensile properties are significantly improved on reinforcement with continuous fiber. The maximum tensile strength of 369 MPa and maximum tensile modulus of 3.4 GPa were achieved with 45% carbon fiber reinforced at 0° isotropic angle and three numbers of concentric rings in each layer. Measurement was also carried out to assess the dimensional quality of the test specimens and found as precise. Scanning electron microscopy indicates the presence of voids at multiple locations around the microfibers, causing a reduction in the tensile properties. The individual micro-fibers were seen as misaligned, mainly in the case of Kevlar fiber. The present work may guide the professionals working with continuous fiber-reinforced 3D printed polymer composites in selecting appropriate process conditions for their specific needs.

Vorheriger Artikel Molecular Dynamics Simulation of Portevin–Le Chatelier Effect in Al-Mg Alloys: Effects of Solute Concentration, Temperature, and Tensile Rate

Nächster Artikel Enhancement in Sliding Wear Resistance of As-Cast Graphite Ductile Irons via Trace TiC-TiB2 Nanoparticles

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

S.H. Masood, Advances in Fused Deposition Modeling, Compr. Mater. Process., 2014, 10, p 69–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-096532-1.01002-5CrossRef

T.D. Ngo, A. Kashani, G. Imbalzano, K.T.Q. Nguyen, and D. Hui, Additive Manufacturing (3D Printing): A Review of Materials, Methods, Applications and Challenges, Compos. Part B Eng., 2018, 143, p 172–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.012CrossRef

A.A. Ansari and M. Kamil, Analysis of Dimensional Quality in 3D Printed Polylactic Acid Parts Fabricated By Fused Deposition Modeling, Mater. Today Proc., 2021, 47, p 2281–2287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.04.219CrossRef

S.M.F. Kabir, K. Mathur, and A.F.M. Seyam, A Critical Review on 3D Printed Continuous Fiber-Reinforced Composites: History, Mechanism, Materials and Properties, Compos. Struct., 2020, 232, p 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111476CrossRef

A.A. Ansari and M. Kamil, 3D Printed Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Composites by Fused Deposition Modeling Process- An Overview, MSJ, 2020, IX, p 957–970.

N. Shahrubudin, T.C. Lee, and R. Ramlan, An Overview on 3D Printing Technology: Technological, Materials, and Applications, Procedia Manuf., 2019, 35, p 1286–1296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2019.06.089CrossRef

P.K. Penumakala, J. Santo, and A. Thomas, A Critical Review on the Fused Deposition Modeling of Thermoplastic Polymer Composites, Compos. B Eng., 2020 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108336CrossRef

M.F.A.S.K. Fayazbakhsh, The Effect of Variable Nozzle Temperature and Cross-Sectional Pattern on Interlayer Tensile Strength of 3D Printed ABS Specimens, Exp. Mech., 2021, 61, p 1473–1487. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-021-00757-yCrossRef

W. Wu, W. Ye, Z. Wu, P. Geng, Y. Wang, and J. Zhao, Influence of Layer Thickness, Raster Angle, Deformation Temperature and Recovery Temperature on the Shape-Memory Effect of 3D-Printed Polylactic acid Samples, Materials (Basel), 2017 https://doi.org/10.3390/ma10080970CrossRef

10.

U. Khaleeq-uz-Zaman, E. Boesch, A. Siadat, M. Rivette, and A.A. Baqai, Impact of Fused Deposition Modeling ( FDM ) Process Parameters on Strength of Built Parts Using Taguchi’s Design Of Experiments, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2018, 101, p 1215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-3014-6CrossRef

11.

A.E. Patterson, T.R. Pereira, J.T. Allison, and S.L. Messimer, Izod Impact Properties of Full-Density Fused Deposition Modeling Polymer Materials with Respect to Raster Angle and Print Orientation, Proc. Instit. Mech. Eng. Part C J. Mech. Eng. Sci., 2019, 235(10), p 1891–1908. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954406219840385CrossRef

12.

S. Farashi and F. Vafaee, Effect of Printing Parameters on the Tensile Strength of FDM 3D Samples: A Meta-Analysis Focusing on Layer Thickness and Sample Orientation, Progr. Addit. Manuf., 2022, 7(4), p 565–582. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40964-021-00247-6CrossRef

13.

M.H. Hsueh et al., Effects of Printing Temperature and Filling Percentage on the Mechanical Behavior of Fused Deposition Molding Technology Components for 3D Printing, Polymers, 2021, 13(17), p 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13172910CrossRef

14.

M. Heidari-Rarani, N. Ezati, P. Sadeghi, and M.R. Badrossamay, Optimization of FDM Process Parameters for Tensile Properties of Polylactic Acid Specimens Using Taguchi Design of Experiment Method, J. Thermoplast. Compos. Mater., 2020, 35(12), p 2435–2452. https://doi.org/10.1177/0892705720964560CrossRef

15.

S.N. Kamoona, S.H. Masood, and O.A. Mohamed, Experimental Investigation on Flexural Properties of FDM Processed Nylon 12 Parts Using RSM, IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2018, 377, p 012137. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/377/1/012137CrossRef

16.

G.D. Goh, Y.L. Yap, H.K.J. Tan, S.L. Sing, G.L. Goh, and W.Y. Yeong, Process–Structure–Properties in Polymer Additive Manufacturing Via Material Extrusion: A Review, Crit. Rev. Solid State Mater. Sci., 2020, 45(2), p 113–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408436.2018.1549977CrossRef

17.

A.A. Ansari and M. Kamil, Effect of Print Speed and Extrusion Temperature on Properties of 3D Printed PLA Using Fused Deposition Modeling Process, Mater. Today Proc., 2021, 45, p 5462–5468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.02.137CrossRef

18.

C. Yang, X. Tian, T. Liu, Y. Cao, and D. Li, 3D Printing for Continuous Fiber Reinforced Thermoplastic Composites: Mechanism and Performance, Rapid Prototyp. J., 2017, 23(1), p 209–215. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-08-2015-0098CrossRef

19.

R.K. Sahu, S.S. Mahapatra, and A.K. Sood, A Study on Dimensional Accuracy of Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) Processed Parts using Fuzzy Logic, J. Manuf. Sci. Prod., 2014, 13(3), p 183–197. https://doi.org/10.1515/jmsp-2013-0010CrossRef

20.

S.R. Rajpurohit and H.K. Dave, Effect of process parameters on tensile strength of FDM printed PLA part, Rapid Prototyp. J., 2018, 24(8), p 1317–1324. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-06-2017-0134CrossRef

21.

A.A. Ansari and M. Kamil, Izod Impact and Hardness Properties of 3D Printed Lightweight CF-reinforced PLA Composites Using Design of Experiment, Int. J. Light. Mater. Manuf., 2022, 5, p 369–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlmm.2022.04.006CrossRef

22.

B.N. Turner, R. Strong, and S.A. Gold, A Review of Melt Extrusion Additive Manufacturing Processes: I. Process Design and Modeling, Rapid Prototyp. J., 2014, 21(3), p 250–261. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-01-2013-0012CrossRef

23.

Y. Zhou, T. Nyberg, G. Xiong, and D. Liu, Temperature Analysis in the Fused Deposition Modeling Process. in Proceedings - 2016 3rd International Conference on Information Science and Control Engineering, ICISCE 2016, 2016, p 678–682, https://doi.org/10.1109/ICISCE.2016.150

24.

K. Aslani, D. Chaidas, and J. Kechagias, Quality Performance Evaluation of Thin Walled PLA 3D Printed Parts Using the Taguchi Method and Grey Relational Analysis, J. Manuf. Mater. Process., 2020, 4(47), p 1–17.

25.

Z. Moza, K. Kitsakis, J. Kechagias, and N. Mastorakis, Optimizing dimensional accuracy of Fused Filament Fabrication using Taguchi design, 2015.

26.

L. Santana, J. Lino Alves, and A. da Costa Sabino Netto, A Study of Parametric Calibration for Low Cost 3D Printing: SEEKING Improvement in Dimensional Quality, Mater. Des., 2017, 135, p 159–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2017.09.020CrossRef

27.

E. Yasa and E. Kıvılcım, Dimensional Accuracy and Mechanical Properties of Chopped Carbon Reinforced Polymers Produced by Material Extrusion Additive Manufacturing, Materials (Basel), 2019, 12(3885), p 1–16.

28.

A.E. Magri, K.E. Mabrouk, S. Vaudreuil, and M.E. Touhami, Mechanical Properties of CF-Reinforced PLA Parts Manufactured by Fused Deposition Modelling, J. Thermoplast. Compos., 2019, 34(5), p 581–595. https://doi.org/10.1177/0892705719847244CrossRef

29.

S.L. Messimer, T.R. Pereira, A.E. Patterson, and M. Lubna, Full-Density Fused Deposition Modeling Dimensional Error as a Function of Raster Angle and Build Orientation: Large Dataset for Eleven Materials, J. Manuf. Mater. Process., 2019, 3(6), p 1–27. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmmp3010006CrossRef

30.

M. Kamaal, M. Anas, H. Bhardwaj, and N. Rastogi, Effect of FDM Process Parameters on Mechanical Properties of 3D - Printed Carbon Fibre – PLA Composite, Prog. Addit. Manuf., 2021, 6, p 63–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40964-020-00145-3CrossRef

31.

Q. Ding, X. Li, D. Zhang, G. Zhao, and Z. Sun, Anisotropy of Poly(lactic acid)/Carbon Fiber Composites Prepared by Fused Deposition Modeling, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 2020, 137(23), p 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.48786CrossRef

32.

H. Brooks and S. Molony, Design and Evaluation of Additively Manufactured Parts with Three Dimensional Continuous Fibre Reinforcement, Mater. Des., 2016 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2015.10.123CrossRef

33.

P. Parandoush and D. Lin, A Review on Additive Manufacturing of Polymer-Fiber Composites, Compos. Struct., 2017, 182, p 36–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.08.088CrossRef

34.

M.A. Caminero, J.M. Chacón, I. García-Moreno, and J.M. Reverte, Interlaminar Bonding Performance of 3D Printed Continuous Fibre Reinforced Thermoplastic Composites Using Fused Deposition Modelling, Polym. Test., 2018, 68, p 415–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.04.038CrossRef

35.

A.D. Pertuz, S. Díaz-cardona, and O.A. González-estrada, Static and Fatigue Behaviour of Continuous Fibre Reinforced Thermoplastic Composites Manufactured by Fused Deposition Modelling Technique, Int. J. Fatigue, 2020, 130(105275), p 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.105275CrossRef

36.

H. Yu, J. Huang, B. Zou, W. Shao, and J. Liu, Stress-Constrained Shell-Lattice Infill Structural Optimisation for Additive Manufacturing, Taylor Fr., 2020, 15(1), p 35–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/17452759.2019.1647488CrossRef

37.

S.M.F. Kabir, K. Mathur, and A.-F.M. Seyam, The Road to Improved Fiber-Reinforced 3D Printing Technology, Technologies, 2020, 8(4), p 51. https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies8040051CrossRef

38.

D.R. Hetrick, S.H.R. Sanei, C.E. Bakis, and O. Ashour, Evaluating the Effect of Variable Fiber Content on Mechanical Properties of Additively Manufactured Continuous Carbon Fiber Composites, J. Reinf. Plast. Compos., 2020, 40(9–10), p 365–377. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731684420963217CrossRef

39.

S.R. Piramanayagam et al., Experimental Investigation and Statistical Analysis of Additively Manufactured Onyx-Carbon Fiber Reinforced Composites, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 2021, 138(18), p 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.50338CrossRef

40.

X. Peng, M. Zhang, Z. Guo, L. Sang, and W. Hou, Investigation of Processing Parameters On Tensile Performance for FDM-Printed Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polyamide 6 Composites, Compos. Commun., 2020, 22, p 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coco.2020.100478CrossRef

41.

R. Told, G. Marada, S. Rendeki, A. Pentek, B. Nagy, and F.J. Molnar, Manufacturing a First Upper Molar Dental Forceps Using Continuous Fiber Reinforcement (CFR) Additive Manufacturing Technology with Carbon-Reinforced Polyamide, Polymers (Basel), 2021, 13(2647), p 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13162647CrossRef

42.

M.S. Saharudin, J. Hajnys, T. Kozior, and D. Gogolewski, Quality of Surface Texture and Mechanical Properties of PLA and PA-Based Material Reinforced with Carbon Fibers Manufactured by FDM and CFF 3D Printing Technologies, Polymers (Basel), 2021, 13(1671), p 1–17.

43.

S.M.F. Kabir, K. Mathur, and A.F.M. Seyam, Maximizing the Performance of 3D Printed Fiber-Reinforced Composites, J. Compos. Sci., 2021, 5(5), p 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs5050136CrossRef

44.

R.R. Fernandes, A.Y. Tamijani, and M. Al-Haik, Mechanical Characterization of Additively Manufactured Fiber-Reinforced Composites, Aerosp. Sci. Technol., 2021, 113, p 106653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2021.106653CrossRef

45.

A.A. Ansari and M. Kamil, Investigation of Flexural Properties in 3D Printed Continuous Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Composites, IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2022, 1248(012070), p 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/1248/1/012070CrossRef

46.

P.S. Ramalingam, K. Mayandi, V. Balasubramanian, K. Chandrasekar, V.M. Stalany, and A.A. Munaf, Effect of 3D Printing Process Parameters on the Impact Strength of Onyx – Glass Fiber Reinforced Composites, Mater. Today Proc., 2021, 45(7), p 6154–6159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.10.467CrossRef

47.

A.N. Dickson, J.N. Barry, K.A. Mcdonnell, and D.P. Dowling, Fabrication of Continuous Carbon, Glass and Kevlar Fibre Reinforced Polymer Composites Using Additive Manufacturing, Addit. Manuf., 2017, 16, p 146–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2017.06.004CrossRef

48.

H. Mei, Z. Ali, I. Ali, and L. Cheng, Tailoring Strength and Modulus by 3D Printing Different Continuous Fibers and Filled Structures Into Composites, Adv. Compos. Hybrid Mater., 2019, 2, p 312–319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42114-019-00087-7CrossRef

49.

G.W. Melenka, B.K.O. Cheung, J.S. Schofield, M.R. Dawson, and J.P. Carey, Evaluation and Prediction of the Tensile Properties of Continuous Fiber-Reinforced 3D Printed Structures, Compos. Struct., 2016, 153, p 866–875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.07.018CrossRef

50.

A.R. Prajapati, H.K. Dave, and H.K. Raval, An Experimental Study on Mechanical, Thermal and Flame-Retardant Properties of 3D-Printed Glass-Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Composites, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2021, 30(7), p 5266–5277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-021-05731-2CrossRef

51.

T. Yu, Z. Zhang, S. Song, Y. Bai, and D. Wu, Tensile and Flexural Behaviors of additively Manufactured Continuous Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Composites, Compos. Struct., 2020, 225, p 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111147CrossRef

52.

F. Dantas, K. Couling, and G.J. Gibbons, Long-Fibre Reinforced Polymer Composites by 3D Printing: Influence of Nature of Reinforcement and Processing Parameters on Mechanical Performance, Funct. Compos. Mater., 2020, 1, p 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42252-020-00010-0CrossRef

53.

A. Parmiggiani, M. Prato, and M. Pizzorni, Effect of the Fiber Orientation on the Tensile and Flexural Behavior of Continuous Carbon Fiber Composites Made Via Fused Filament Fabrication, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2021, 114, p 2085–2101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-06997-5CrossRef

54.

X. Zhou, S.J. Hsieh, and C.C. Ting, Modelling and Estimation of Tensile Behaviour of Polylactic Acid Parts Manufactured by Fused Deposition Modelling Using Finite Element Analysis and Knowledge-Based Library, Virtual Phys. Prototyp., 2018, 13, p 177–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/17452759.2018.1442681CrossRef

55.

F. Rayegani and G.C. Onwubolu, Fused Deposition Modelling (FDM) Process Parameter Prediction and Optimization Using Group Method for Data Handling (GMDH) and Differential Evolution (de), Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2014, 73, p 509–519. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-5835-2CrossRef

56.

W. Liu, J. Zhou, Y. Ma, J. Wang, and X. Jie, Fabrication of PLA Filaments and its Printable Performance, IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2017, 275, p 012033. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/275/1/012033CrossRef

57.

Y. Ming, S. Zhang, W. Han, B. Wang, Y. Duan, and H. Xiao, Investigation on Process Parameters of 3D Printed Continuous Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Thermosetting Epoxy Composites, Addit. Manuf., 2020, 33, p 101184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2020.101184CrossRef

58.

S.M.F. Kabir, K. Mathur, and A.F.M. Seyam, Impact Resistance and Failure Mechanism of 3D Printed Continuous Fiber-Reinforced Cellular Composites, J. Text. Inst., 2021, 112(5), p 752–766. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405000.2020.1778223CrossRef

59.

A. İpekçi and B. Ekici, Experimental and Statistical Analysis of Robotic 3D Printing Process Parameters for Continuous Fiber Reinforced Composites, J. Compos. Mater., 2021, 55, p 2645–2655. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021998321996425CrossRef

60.

S. Kumar, P. Ranjeet, and K. Sahu, Optimization of Fused Deposition Modeling Process Parameters Using a Fuzzy Inference System Coupled with Taguchi Philosophy, Adv. Manuf., 2017, 5(3), p 231–242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40436-017-0187-4CrossRef

61.

A. Equbal, A.K. Sood, R.K. Ohdar, and S.S. Mahapatra, Prediction of Dimensional Accuracy in Fused Deposition Modelling: A Fuzzy Logic Approach, Int. J. Product. Qual. Manag., 2011, 7(1), p 22–43. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPQM.2011.037730CrossRef

62.

H. Tanyildizi, Statistical Analysis for Mechanical Properties of Polypropylene Fiber Reinforced Lightweight Concrete Containing Silica Fume Exposed to High Temperature, Mater. Des., 2009 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2008.11.032CrossRef

63.

J. Kananathan, M. Samykano, K. Kadirgama, D. Ramasamy, and M.M. Rahman, Comprehensive Investigation and Prediction Model for Mechanical Properties of Coconut Wood–Polylactic Acid Composites Filaments for FDM 3D Printing, Eur. J. Wood Wood Prod., 2022, 80(1), p 75–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00107-021-01768-1CrossRef

64.

A.K. Sood, V. Chaturvedi, S. Datta, and S.S. Mahapatra, Optimization of Process Parameters in Fused Deposition Modeling Using Weighted Principal Component Analysis, J. Adv. Manuf. Syst., 2011, 10(2), p 241–259. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219686711002181CrossRef

65.

R. Matsuzaki et al., Three-Dimensional Printing of Continuous-Fiber Composites by In-Nozzle Impregnation, Sci. Rep., 2016, 6, p 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep23058CrossRef

66.

H. Luo, Y. Tan, F. Zhang, J. Zhang, Y. Tu, and K. Cui, Selectively Enhanced 3D Printing Process and Performance Analysis of Continuous Carbon Fiber Composite Material, Materials (Basel), 2019, 12(21), p 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12213529CrossRef

67.

A. Todoroki et al., Tensile Property Evaluations of 3D Printed Continuous Carbon Fiber Reinforced thermoplastic Composites, Adv. Compos. Mater., 2020, 29(2), p 147–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243046.2019.1650323CrossRef

68.

S.M. Phadke, Quality Engineering Using Robust Design, PTR Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 1989.

69.

F. Van Der Klift, Y. Koga, A. Todoroki, M. Ueda, and Y. Hirano, 3D Printing of Continuous Carbon Fibre Reinforced Thermo-Plastic (CFRTP) Tensile Test Specimens, Open J. Compos. Mater., 2016, 6(January), p 18–27.CrossRef

Titel: Performance Study of 3D Printed Continuous Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Composites Using Taguchi Method
verfasst von: Anis A. Ansari
M. Kamil
Publikationsdatum: 13.12.2022
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance / Ausgabe 21/2023
Print ISSN: 1059-9495
Elektronische ISSN: 1544-1024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-022-07715-2

Premium Partner

Marktübersichten

Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen.

Zur Marktübersicht

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 21/2023

Correction to: Screw Extrusion Additive Manufacturing of Carbon Fiber Reinforced PA6 Tools

Organo-Cerium as a Quick Repair Agent for Coating Damage on Carbon Steel

Effects of Nb on Stress Corrosion Cracking of Various Heat-Affected Zone Microstructures of E690 Steel under Cathodic Potential

Effect of Peening Parameters on the Ultrasonic Shot-Peened Surfaces of Electro-co-deposited Ni/Ni-TiO2 Coatings

Correlation of Alpha Phase and Its Texture Stability in Heat-Treated Ti-6.5%Al-4.4%V-0.15%Fe Alloy

Improving the Surface Performance of Discarded AISI T1 Steel by Cathodic Reduction and Thermal Diffusion-Based Boriding

Premium Partner

Marktübersichten