Planung und exekutive Kontrolle von Handlungen

Abeles, M. (1991). Corticonics: Neural circuits of the cerebral cortex. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Ach, N. (1910). Über den Willensakt und das Temperament. Leipzig: Quelle und Meyer.

Aglioti, S., Goodale, M. A., & DeSouza, J. F. X. (1995). Size-contrast illusions deceive the eye but not the hand. Current Biology, 5, 679–685.PubMedCrossRef

Allport, D. A. (1993). Attention and control: Have we been asking the wrong questions? A critical review of twenty-five years. In D. E. Meyer, & S. Kornblum (Hrsg.), Attention and performance XIV (S. 183–218). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Allport, D. A., & Wylie, G. (2000). ‘Task-switching’, stimulus-response bindings and negative priming. In S. Monsell, & J. Driver (Hrsg.), Attention and performance XVIII: Control of Cognitive Processes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Allport, D. A., Styles, E. A., & Hsieh, S. (1994). Shifting intentional set: Exploring the dynamic control of tasks. In C. Umiltá, & M. Moscovitch (Hrsg.), Attention and performance XV: Conscious and nonconscious information processing (S. 421–452). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Aschersleben, G., Stenneken, P., Cole, J., & Prinz, W. (2002). Timing mechanisms in sensorimotor synchronization. In W. Prinz, & B. Hommel (Hrsg.), Attention und performance XIX: Common mechanisms in perception and action (S. 227–244). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Baars, B. J. (1980). Eliciting predictable speech errors in the laboratory. In V. A. Fromkin (Hrsg.), Errors in linguistic performance: Slips of the tongue, ear, pen, and hand (S. 307–318). New York: Academic Press.

Baars, B. J. (1988). A cognitive theory of consciousness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bard, C., Paillard, J., Lajoie, Y., Fleury, M., Teasdale, N., Forget, R., & Lamarre, Y. (1992). Role of the afferent information in the timing of motor commands: A comparative study with a deafferent patient. Neuropsychologia, 30, 201–206.PubMedCrossRef

Bialystok, E. (2001). Bilingualism in development: Language, literacy, and cognition. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Botvinick, M. M. (2007). Conflict monitoring and decision making: Reconciling two perspectives on anterior cingulate function. Cognitive Affective und Behavioral Neuroscience, 7, 356–366.CrossRef

Botvinick, M. M., & Plaut, D. C. (2004). Doing without schema hierarchies: a recurrent connectionist approach to routine sequential action and its pathologies. Psychological Review, 111, 395–429.PubMedCrossRef

Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review, 108, 624–652.PubMedCrossRef

Bridgeman, B. (2002). Attention and visually guided behavior in distinct systems. In W. Prinz, & B. Hommel (Hrsg.), Attention und performance XIX: Common mechanisms in perception and action (S. 120–135). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Bridgeman, B., Kirch, M., & Sperling, A. (1981). Segregation of cognitive and motor aspects of visual function using induced motion. Perception and Psychophysics, 29, 336–342.CrossRef

Brown, P., Salenius, S., Rothwell, J. C., & Hari, R. (1998). Cortical correlate of the Piper rhythm in humans. Journal of Neurophysiology, 80, 2911–2917.PubMed

Bullock, D., & Grossberg, S. (1988). Neural dynamics of planned arm movements: Emergent invariants and speed-accuracy properties during trajectory formation. Psychological Review, 95, 49–90.PubMedCrossRef

Burgess, P. W. (2000). Strategy application disorder: The role of the frontal lobes in human multitasking. Psychological Research, 63, 279–288.PubMedCrossRef

Butler, J., & Rovee-Collier, C. (1989). Contextual gating of memory retrieval. Developmental Psychobiology, 22, 533–552.PubMedCrossRef

Carrier, L. M., & Pashler, H. (1995). Attentional limits in memory retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 1339–1348.PubMed

Chugani, H. T. (1994). Development of regional brain glucose metabolism in relation to behavior and plasticity. In G. Dawson, & K. Fischer (Hrsg.), Human behavior and the developing brain (S. 153–175). New York: Guilford.

Clark, A. (1999). An embodied cognitive science. Trends in Cognitive Science, 3, 345–351.CrossRef

Coles, M. G. H., Gratton, G., Bashore, T. R., Eriksen, C. W., & Donchin, E. (1985). A psychophysiological investigation of the continuous flow model of human information processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11, 529–553.PubMed

Décary, A., & Richer, F. (1995). Response selection deficits in frontal excisions. Neuropsychologia, 33, 1243–1253.PubMedCrossRef

Decety, & Grèzes, J. (1999). Neural mechanisms subserving the perception of human actions. Trends in Cognitive Neuroscience, 3, 172–178.CrossRef

Decety, J., Perani, D., Jeannerod, M., Bettinardi, V., Tadary, B., Woods, R., Mazziotta, J. C., & Fazio, F. (1994). Mapping motor representations with positron emission tomography. Nature, 371, 600–602.PubMedCrossRef

Deecke, L., Grozinger, B., & Kornhuber, H. H. (1976). Voluntary finger movement in man: Cerebral potentials and theory. Biological Cybernetics, 23, 99–119.PubMedCrossRef

De Jong, R. (1993). Multiple bottlenecks in overlapping task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 965–980.PubMed

De Jong, R. (2000). An intention-activation account of residual switch costs. In S. Monsell, & J. Driver (Hrsg.), Attention and performance XVIII: Control of cognitive processes (S. 357–376). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

De Jong, R., Berendsen, E., & Cools, R. (1999). Goal neglect and inhibitory limitations: Dissociable causes of interference effects in conflict situations. Acta Psychologica, 101, 379–394.PubMedCrossRef

Dell, G. S. (1986). A spreading activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 93, 283–321.PubMedCrossRef

Dell, G. S., Burger, L. K., & Svec, W. R. (1997). Language production and serial order: A functional analysis and a model. Psychological Review, 104, 123–147.PubMedCrossRef

Dewey, J. (1896). The reflex arc concept in psychology. Psychological Review, 3, 357–370.CrossRef

DeYoe, E. A., & Van Essen, D. C. (1988). Concurrent processing streams in monkey visual cortex. Trends in Neuroscience, 11, 219–226.CrossRef

Diamond, A. (1985). Development of the ability to use recall to guide action, as indicated by infants’ performance on AB. Child Development, 56, 868–883.PubMedCrossRef

Diamond, A. (1990). Developmental time course in human infants and infant monkeys, and the neural bases of inhibitory control of reaching. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 608, 637–676.PubMedCrossRef

Diamond, A., & Gilbert, J. (1989). Development as progressive inhibitory control of action: Retrieval of a contiguous object. Cognitive Development, 4, 223–249.CrossRef

Diamond, A., & Goldman-Rakic, P. S. (1986). Comparative development in human infants and infant rhesus monkeys of cognitive functions that depend on prefrontal cortex. Society for Neuroscience Abstracts, 12, 742.

Dixon, P. (1981). Algorithms and selective attention. Memory and Cognition, 9, 177–184.PubMedCrossRef

Dixon, P., & Just, M. A. (1986). A chronometric analysis of strategy preparation in choice reactions. Memory and Cognition, 14, 488–500.PubMedCrossRef

Donkelaar, P. van, & Franks, I. M. (1991). Preprogramming vs. on-line control in simple movement sequences. Acta Psychologica, 77, 1–19.PubMedCrossRef

Drewe, E. A. (1975). An experimental investigation of Luria’s theory on the effects of frontal lobe lesions in man. Neuropsychologia, 13, 421–429.PubMedCrossRef

Dutta, A., Schweickert, R., Choi, S., & Proctor, R. W. (1995). Cross-task cross talk in memory and perception. Acta Psychologica, 90, 49–62.PubMedCrossRef

Eenshuistra, R. M., Weidema, M. A., & Hommel, B. (2004). Development of the acquisition and control of action-effect associations. Acta Psychologica, 115, 185–209.PubMedCrossRef

Egner, T., & Hirsch, J. (2005). Cognitive control mechanisms resolve conflict through cortical amplification of task-relevant information. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1784–1790.PubMedCrossRef

Elsner, & Hommel, B. (2001). Effect anticipation and action control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 229–240.PubMed

Elsner, B., Hommel, B., Mentschel, C., Drzezga, A., Prinz, W., Conrad, B., & Siebner, H. (2002). Linking actions and their perceivable consequences in the human brain. NeuroImage, 17, 364–372.PubMedCrossRef

Engel, A. K., Roelfsema, P. R., Fries, P., Brecht, M., & Singer, W. (1997). Role of the temporal domain for response selection and perceptual binding. Cerebral Cortex, 7, 571–582.PubMedCrossRef

Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception and Psychophysics, 16, 143–149.CrossRef

Eriksen, B. A., Eriksen, C. W., & Hoffman, J. E. (1986). Recognition memory and attentional selection: Serial scanning is not enough. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 12, 476–483.PubMed

Eriksen, C. W., Pollack, M. D., & Montague, W. E. (1970). Implicit speech: Mechanism in perceptual encoding? Journal of Experimental Psychology, 84, 502–507.CrossRef

Eriksen, C. W., Coles, M. G. H., Morris, L. R., & O’Hara, W. P. (1985). An electromyographic examination of response competition. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 23, 165–168.CrossRef

Estes, W. K. (1972). An associative basis for coding and organization in memory. In A. W. Melton, & E. Martin (Hrsg.), Coding processes in human memory (S. 161–190). New York: Wiley.

Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Pavesi, G., & Rizzolatti, G. (1995). Motor facilitation during action observation: A magnetic stimulation study. Journal of Neurophysiology, 73, 2608–2611.PubMed

Fagen, J. W., Rovee-Collier, C. K., & Kaplan, M. G. (1976). Psychophysical scaling of stimulus similarity in 3-month-old infants and adults. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 22, 272–281.PubMedCrossRef

Fagot, C., & Pashler, H. (1992). Making two responses to a single object: Implications for the central attentional bottleneck. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 1058–1079.PubMed

Fimm, B., Bartl, G., Zimermann, P., & Wallesch, C.-W. (1994). Different mechanisms underly shifting set on external and internal cues in Parkinson’s disease. Brain and Cognition, 25, 287–304.PubMedCrossRef

Fischer, R., & Hommel, B. (2012). Deep thinking increases task-set shielding and reduces shifting flexibility in dual-task performance. Cognition, 123, 303–307.PubMedCrossRef

Fischman, M. G. (1984). Programming time as a function of number movement parts and changes in movement direction. Journal of Motor Behavior, 16, 405–423.PubMedCrossRef

Fischman, M. G., & Lim, C. (1991). Influence of extended practice on programming time, movement time, and transfer in simple target-striking responses. Journal of Motor Behavior, 23, 39–50.PubMedCrossRef

Fournier, L. R., Wiediger, M. D., McMeans, R., Mattson, P. S., Kirkwood, J., & Herzog, T. (2010). Holding a manual response sequence in memory can disrupt vocal responses that share semantic features with the manual response. Psychological Research, 74, 359–369.PubMedCrossRef

Fromkin, V. A. (Hrsg.). (1980). Errors in linguistic performance: Slips of the tongue, ear, pen, and hand. New York: Academic Press.

Gallistel, C. R. (1980). The organization of action. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Garcia-Colera, A., & Semjen, A. (1987). The organization of rapid movement sequences as a function of sequence length. Acta Psychologica, 66, 237–250.CrossRef

Garcia-Colera, A., & Semjen, A. (1988). Distributed planning of movement sequences. Journal of Motor Behavior, 20, 341–367.PubMedCrossRef

Garrett, M. F. (1982). Production of speech: Observations from normal and pathological language use. In A. W. Ellis (Hrsg.), Normality and pathology in cognitive functions (S. 19–76). London: Academic Press.

Gentner, D. R. (1983). The acquisition of typewriting skill. Acta Psychologica, 54, 233–248.CrossRef

Gentner, D. R., Grudin, J. und Conway, E. (1980). Finger movements in transcription typing. (Technical Report 8001) La Jolla, CA: University of California, San Diego, Center for Human Information Processing.

Georgopoulos, A. P. (1990). Neurophysiology of reaching. In M. Jeannerod (Hrsg.), Attention and performance XIII: Motor representation and control (S. 227–263). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Gerstadt, C. L., Hong, Y. J., & Diamond, A. (1994). The relationship between cognition and action: Performance of children 31/2–7 years old on a Stroop-like day-night test. Cognition, 53, 129–153.PubMedCrossRef

Ghez, C., Hening, W., & Favilla, M. (1990). Parallel interacting channels in the initiation and specification of motor response features. In M. Jeannerod (Hrsg.), Attention and performance XIII: Motor representation and control (S. 265–293). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Gibson, J. J. (1941). A critical review of the concept of set in contemporary experimental psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 38, 781–817.CrossRef

Goodman, D., & Kelso, J. A. S. (1980). Are movements prepared in parts? Not under compatible (naturalized) conditions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 475–495.CrossRef

Gopher, D. (1996). Attention control: Explorations of the work of an executive controller. Cognitive Brain Research, 5, 23–38.PubMedCrossRef

Gopher, D. (1984). S-Oh-R: Of stages! Oh resources! In A. F. Sanders, & W. Prinz (Hrsg.), Cognition and motor processes (S. 231–253). Berlin: Springer.CrossRef

Greeno, J. G., & Simon, H. A. (1974). Processes for sequence production. Psychological Review, 81, 187–198.CrossRef

Greenwald, A. G. (1970). Sensory feedback mechanisms in performance control: With special reference to the ideomotor mechanism. Psychological Review, 77, 73–99.PubMedCrossRef

Greenwald, A. G. (1972). On doing two things at once: Time sharing as a function of ideomotor compatibility. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 94, 52–57.PubMedCrossRef

Greenwald, A. G. (2003). On doing two things at once: III. Confirmation of perfect timesharing when simultaneous tasks are ideomotor compatible. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 859–868.PubMed

Greenwald, A. G. (2004). On doing two things at once: IV. Necessary and sufficient conditions: Rejoinder to Lien, Proctor, and Ruthruff (2003). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 632–636.PubMed

Grudin, J. (1983). Non-hierarchic specification of components in transcription typewriting. Acta Psychologica, 54, 249–262.CrossRef

Harless, E. (1861). Der Apparat des Willens. Zeitschrift fuer Philosophie und philosophische Kritik, 38, 50–73.

Harrington, D. L., & Haaland, K. Y. (1987). Programming sequences of hand postures. Journal of Motor Behavior, 19, 77–95.PubMedCrossRef

Henry, F. M., & Rogers, D. E. (1960). Increased response latency for complicated movements and a „memory drum“ theory of neuromotor reaction. Research Quarterly, 31, 448–458.

Heuer, H. (1981). Fast aiming movements with the left and right hand: Evidence for two-process theories of motor control. Psychological Research, 43, 81–96.PubMedCrossRef

Heuer, H. (1986). Über die Annahme relations-abhängiger Vorprogrammierung bei der Interpretation von Reaktionszeitexperimenten zur motorischen Vorbereitung. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle und Angewandte Psychologie, 33, 563–586.

Hick, W. E. (1952). On the rate of gain of information. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 4, 11–26.CrossRef

Hirst, W., & Kalmar, D. (1987). Characterizing attentional resources. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 116, 68–81.CrossRef

Hoffmann, J. (1993). Vorhersage und Erkenntnis. Göttingen: Hogrefe.

Hoffmann, J., Sebald, A., & Stöcker, C. (2001). Irrelevant response effects improve serial learning in serial reaction time tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 470–482.PubMed

Holender, D. (1980). Interference between a vocal and a manual response to the same stimulus. In G. E. Stelmach, & J. Requin (Hrsg.), Tutorials in motor behavior (S. 421–431). Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.CrossRef

Holland, C., & Rathod, V. (2013). Influence of personal mobile phone ringing and usual intention to answer on driver error. Accident Analysis und Prevention, 50, 793–800.CrossRef

Hommel, B. (1996a). The cognitive representation of action: Automatic integration of perceived action effects. Psychological Research, 59, 176–186.PubMedCrossRef

Hommel, B. (1996b). S-R compatibility effects without response uncertainty. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49A, 546–571.CrossRef

Hommel, B. (1997). Toward an action-concept model of stimulus-response compatibility. In B. Hommel, & W. Prinz (Hrsg.), Theoretical issues in stimulus-response compatibility (S. 281–320). Amsterdam: Elsevier.CrossRef

Hommel, B. (1998a). Automatic stimulus-response translation in dual-task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1368–1384.PubMed

Hommel, B. (1998b). Event files: Evidence for automatic integration of stimulus-response episodes. Visual Cognition, 5, 183–216.CrossRef

Hommel, B. (2000a). Intentional control of automatic stimulus-response translation. In Y. Rossetti, & A. Revonsuo (Hrsg.), Interaction between dissociable conscious and nonconscious processes (S. 223–244). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Hommel, B. (2000b). The prepared reflex: Automaticity and control in stimulus-response translation. In S. Monsell, & J. Driver (Hrsg.), Attention and performance XVIII: Control of cognitive processes (S. 247–273). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Hommel, B. (2009). Action control according to TEC (theory of event coding). Psychological Research, 73, 512–526.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Hommel, B. (2010). Grounding attention in action control: The intentional control of selection. In B. J. Bruya (Hrsg.), Effortless attention: A new perspective in the cognitive science of attention and action (S. 121–140). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRef

Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 849–878.PubMedCrossRef

Hull, C. L. (1931). Goal attraction and directing ideas conceived as habit phenomena. Psychological Review, 38, 487–506.CrossRef

Hulstijn, W., & Galen, G. P. van (1983). Programming in handwriting: Reaction time and movement time as a function of sequence length. Acta Psychologica, 54, 23–49.CrossRef

Hulstijn, W., & Galen, G. P. van (1988). Levels of motor programming in writing familiar and unfamiliar symbols. In A. M. Colley, & J. K. Beech (Hrsg.), Cognition and action in skilled behavior (S. 65–85). Amsterdam: North-Holland, Elsevier.CrossRef

Hyman, R. (1953). Stimulus information as a determinant of reaction time. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45, 188–196.PubMedCrossRef

Inhoff, A. W. (1986). Preparing sequences of saccades under choice reaction conditions: Effects of sequence length and context. Acta Psychologica, 61, 211–228.PubMedCrossRef

Ivry, R. B., Franz, E. A., Kingstone, A., & Johnston, J. C. (1998). The psychological refractory period effect following callosotomy: Uncoupling of lateralized response codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 463–480.PubMed

James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology. New York, NY: Dover.CrossRef

Jeannerod, M. (1981). Intersegmental coordination during reaching at natural objects. In J. Long, & A. Baddeley (Hrsg.), Attention and performance IX (S. 153–169). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Jeannerod, M. (1984). The contribution of open-loop and closed-loop control modes in prehension movements. In S. Kornblum, & J. Requin (Hrsg.), Preparatory states and processes: Proceedings of the franco-american conference (S. 323–337). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Jeannerod, M. (1994). The representing brain: Neural correlates of motor intention and imagery. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 17, 187–245.CrossRef

Jeannerod, M., & Biguer, B. (1982). Visuomotor mechanisms in reaching within extrapersonal space. In D. J. Ingle, M. A. Goodale, & R. J. W. Mansfield (Hrsg.), Analysis of visual behavior (S. 387–409). Cambridge: MIT Press.

Jersild, A. T. (1927). Mental set and shift. Archives of Psychology, 89.

Jolicœur, P. (1999). Capacity demands of accessing short-term memory. Paper presented at the Ninth Annual Meeting of the Canadian Society for Brain, Behaviour, and Cognitive Science, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, June 18–19.

Jolicœur, P., & Dell’Acqua, R. (1998). The demonstration of short-term consolidation. Cognitive Psychology, 36, 138–202.PubMedCrossRef

Jolicœur, P., Dell’Acqua, R., & Crebolder, J. (2000). Multitasking performance deficits: Forging some links between the attentional blink and the psychological refractory period. In S. Monsell, & J. Driver (Hrsg.), Attention and performance XVIII: Control of cognitive processes (S. 309–330). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Jolicœur, P., Tombu, M., Oriet, C., & Stevanovski, B. (2002). From perception to action: Making the connection. In W. Prinz, & B. Hommel (Hrsg.), Attention und performance XIX: Common mechanisms in perception and action (S. 558–586). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Kachergis, G., Wyatte, D., O’Reilly, R. C., Kleijn, R. de, & Hommel, B. (2014). A continuous time neural model for sequential action. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 369, 20130623. doi:10.1098/rstb.2013.0623).CrossRef

Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Kalaska, J. F., & Hyde, M. L. (1985). Area 4 and area 5: Differences between the load direction-dependent discharge variability of cells during active postural fixation. Experimental Brain Research, 59, 197–202.PubMedCrossRef

Kalnins, I. V., & Bruner, J. S. (1973). The coordination of visual observation and instrumental behavior in early infancy. Perception, 2, 307–314.PubMedCrossRef

Karlin, L., & Kerstenbaum, R. (1968). Effects of number of alternatives on the psychological refractory period. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 20, 167–178.PubMedCrossRef

Keele, S. W. (1968). Movement control in skilled motor performance. Psychological Bulletin, 70, 387–403.CrossRef

Keele, S. W., & Posner, M. I. (1968). Processing of visual feedback in rapid movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 77, 155–158.PubMedCrossRef

Keele, S. W., Cohen, A., & Ivry, R. (1990). Motor programs: Concepts and issues. In M. Jeannerod (Hrsg.), Attention and performance XIII: Motor representation and control (S. 77–110). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Kerns, J. G., Cohen, J. D., MacDonald, A. W., Cho, R., Stenger, V. A., & Carter, C. S. (2004). Anterior cingulate conflict monitoring and adjustments in control. Science, 303, 1023–1026.PubMedCrossRef

Kiesel, A., Steinhauser, M., Wendt, M., Falkenstein, M., Jost, K., Philipp, A. M., & Koch, I. (2010). Control and interference in task switching – A review. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 849–874.PubMedCrossRef

Klapp, S. T., & Wyatt, E. P. (1976). Motor programming within a sequence of resposes. Journal of Motor Behavior, 8, 19–26.PubMedCrossRef

Kleijn, R. de, Kachergis, G., & Hommel, B. (2014). Everyday robotic action: Lessons from human action control. Frontiers in Neurorobotics, 8, 13.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Kluwe, R. H. (1997). Intentionale Steuerung kognitiver Aktivität. Kognitionswissenschaft, 6, 53–69.CrossRef

Kolb, B., & Whishaw, I. Q. (1990). Neuropsychologie. Heidelberg: Spektrum Akademischer Verlag.

Kornbrot, D. E. (1989). Organisation of keying skills: The effect of motor complexity and number of units. Acta Psychologica, 70, 19–41.CrossRef

Kray, J., & Lindenberger, U. (2000). Adult age differences in task switching. Psychology and Aging, 15, 126–147.PubMedCrossRef

Kristeva-Feige, R., Feige, B., Makeig, S., Ross, B., & Elbert, T. (1993). Oscillatory brain activity during a motor task. NeuroReport, 4, 1291–1294.PubMedCrossRef

Kühn, S., Keizer, A., Rombouts, S. A. R. B., & Hommel, B. (2011). The functional and neural mechanism of action preparation: Roles of EBA and FFA in voluntary action control. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 214–220.PubMedCrossRef

Kutas, M., & Donchin, E. (1980). Preparation to respond as manifested by movement-related brain potentials. Brain Research, 202, 95–115.PubMedCrossRef

Lashley, K. S. (1917). The accuracy of movement in the absence of excitation from the moving organ. American Journal of Physiology, 43, 169–194.

Lashley, K. S. (1951). The problem of serial order in behavior. In L. A. Jeffress (Hrsg.), Cerebral mechanisms in behavior (S. 112–146). New York: John Wiley und Sons.

Lee, T. D., Elliott, D., & Carnahan, H. (1987). The preparation of actions and parameters of action: A fixed or variable process? Acta Psychologica, 66, 83–102.CrossRef

Leonard, J. A. (1958). Partial advance information in a choice reaction task. Genetic Psychology, 49, 89–96.

Lépine, D., Glencross, D., & Requin, J. (1989). Some experimental evidence for and against a parametric conception of movement programming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 347–362.

Lewin, K. (1922). Das Problem der Willensmessung und das Grundgesetz der Assoziation II. Psychologische Forschung, 2, 65–140.CrossRef

Lhermitte, F. (1983). „Utilization behaviour“ and its relation to lesions of the frontal lobes. Brain, 106, 237–255.PubMedCrossRef

Livesey, D. J., & Morgan, G. A. (1991). The development of response inhibition in 4- and 5-year-old children. Australian Journal of Psychology, 43, 133–137.CrossRef

Logan, G. D. (1978). Attention in character-classification tasks: Evidence for the automaticity of component stages. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 107, 32–63.CrossRef

Logan, G. D. (1980). Short-term memory demands of reaction-time tasks that differ in complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 6, 375–389.

Logan, G. D. (1988). Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review, 95, 492–527.CrossRef

Logan, G. D., & Bundesen, C. (2003). Clever homunculus: Is there an endogenous act of control in the explicit task-cuing procedure? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 575–599.PubMed

Logan, G. D., & Burkell, J. (1986). Dependence and independence in responding to double stimulation: A comparison of stop, change, and dual-task paradigms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 12, 549–563.

Logan, G. D., & Schulkind, M. D. (2000). Parallel memory retrieval in dual-task situations: I. Semantic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 1072–1090.PubMed

Lotze, R. H. (1852). Medicinische Psychologie oder die Physiologie der Seele. Leipzig: Weidmann’sche Buchhandlung.

Luria, A. R. (1961). The role of speech in the regulation of normal and abnormal behavior. New York: Pergamon.

Luria, A. R. (1966). Higher cortical functions in man. New York: Basic.

MacKay, D. G. (1987). The organization of perception and action. New York: Springer.CrossRef

MacKay, W. A. (1997). Synchronized neuronal oscillations and their role in motor processes. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 1, 176–183.PubMedCrossRef

MacNeilage, P. F. (1970). Motor control of serial ordering of speech. Psychological Review, 77, 182–196.PubMedCrossRef

Malsburg, C. von der (1981). The correlation theory of brain function. Internal report. Göttingen: Max-Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry.

Malsburg, C. von der (1995). Binding in models of perception and brain function. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 5, 520–526.PubMedCrossRef

Mayr, U., & Keele, S. W. (2000). Changing internal constraints on action: The role of backward inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 4–26.CrossRef

Mayr, U., & Kliegl, R. (2000). Task-set switching and long-term memory retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 26, 1124–1140.

McCann, R. S., & Johnston, J. C. (1992). Locus of the single-channel bottleneck in dual-task interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 471–484.

McIntosh, R. D., & Schenk, T. (2009). Two visual streams for perception and action: current trends. Neuropsychologia, 47, 1391–1396.PubMedCrossRef

Mehta, B., & Schaal, S. (2002). Forward models in visuomotor control. Journal of Neurophysiology, 88, 942–953.PubMed

Meiran, N. (1996). Reconfiguration of processing mode prior to task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 22, 1423–1442.

Meiran, N. (2000a). Reconfiguration of stimulus task-sets and response task-sets during task-switching. In S. Monsell, & J. Driver (Hrsg.), Attention and performance XVIII: Control of cognitive processes (S. 377–399). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Meiran, N. (2000b). Modeling cognitive control in task-switching. Psychological Research, 63, 234–249.PubMedCrossRef

Meiran, N., Chorev, Z., & Sapir, A. (2000). Component processes in task switching. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 211–253.PubMedCrossRef

Meiran, N., Hommel, B., Bibi, U., & Ben-Dov, I. (2002). Consciousness and control in task switching. Consciousness und Cognition, 11, 10–33.CrossRef

Melcher, T., Weidema, M., Eenshuistra, R. M., Hommel, B., & Gruber, O. (2008). The neural substrate of the ideomotor principle: An event-related fMRI analysis. NeuroImage, 39, 1274–1288.PubMedCrossRef

Meyer, D. E., & Gordon, P. C. (1985). Speech production: Motor programming of phonetic features. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 3–26.CrossRef

Meyer, D. E., & Kieras, E. D. (1997a). A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple task performance: Part 1, Basic mechanisms. Psychological Review, 104, 3–75.PubMedCrossRef

Meyer, D. E., & Kieras, D. E. (1997b). A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 2. Accounts of psychological refractory-period phenomena. Psychological Review, 104, 749–791.CrossRef

Meyer, D. E., Kieras, D. E., Lauber, E., Schumacher, E., Glass, J., Zurbriggen, E., Gmeind, L., & Apfelblat, D. (1995). Adaptive executive control: Flexible multiple-task performance without pervasive immutable response-selection bottlenecks. Acta Psychologica, 90, 163–190.CrossRef

Miller, G. A., Galanter, E., & Pribram, K. H. (1960). Plans and the structure of behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart und Winston.CrossRef

Milner, A. D., & Goodale, M. A. (1995). The visual brain in action. Oxford: University Press.

Mischel, H. N., & Mischel, W. (1983). The development of children’s knowledge of self-control strategies. Child Development, 54, 603–619.CrossRef

Mishkin, M., Ungerleider, L. G., & Macko, K. A. (1983). Object vision and spatial vision: Two cortical pathways. Trends in Neuroscience, 6, 414–417.CrossRef

Monsell, S. (1986). Programming of complex sequences: Evidence from the timing of rapid speech and other productions. In H. Heuer, & C. Fromm (Hrsg.), Generation and modulation of action patterns (S. 72–86). Berlin: Springer.CrossRef

Monsell, S. (1996). Control of mental processes. In V. Bruce (Hrsg.), Unsolved mysteries of the mind (S. 93–148). Hove: Erlbaum.

Monsell, S. (2003). Task switching. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 134–140.PubMedCrossRef

Monsell, S., & Driver, J. (Hrsg.). (2000). Attention and performance XVIII: Control of cognitive processes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Münsterberg, H. (1889). Beiträge zur experimentellen Psychologie. Bd. 1. Freiburg: Mohr.

Murthy, V. N., & Fetz, E. E. (1992). Coherent 25- to 35-Hz oscillations in the sensorimotor cortex of awake behaving monkeys. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 89, 5670–5674.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Murthy, V. N., & Fetz, E. E. (1996). Oscillatory activity in sensorimotor cortex of awake monkeys: Synchronization of local field potentials and relation to behavior. Journal of Neurophysiology, 76, 3949–3967.PubMed

Navon, D., & Gopher, D. (1979). On the economy of the human information-processing system. Psychological Review, 86, 214–255.CrossRef

Navon, D., & Miller, J. (1987). Role of outcome conflict in dual-task interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13, 435–448.PubMed

Netick, A., & Klapp, S. T. (1994). Hesitations in manual tracking: A single-channel limit in response programming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 766–782.PubMed

Neumann, O. (1987). Beyond capacity: A functional view of attention. In H. Heuer, & A. F. Sanders (Hrsg.), Perspectives on perception and action (S. 361–394). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Norman, D. A. (1981). Categorization of action slips. Psychological Review, 88, 1–15.CrossRef

Osman, A., Bashore, T. R., Coles, M. G. H., Donchin, E., & Meyer, D. E. (1992). On the transmission of partial information: Inferences from movement-related brain research. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 217–232.PubMed

Owen, A. M., Stern, C. E., Look, R. B., Tracey, I., Rosen, B. R., & Petrides, M. (1993). Functional organization of spatial and nonspatial working memory processing within the human lateral frontal cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the United States of America, 95, 7721–7726.CrossRef

Pashler, H. (1994a). Dual-task interference in simple tasks: Data and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 220–244.PubMedCrossRef

Pashler, H. (1994b). Graded capacity-sharing in dual-task interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 330–342.PubMed

Pashler, H. (1998). The psychology of attention. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Pashler, H., & Christian, C. (1996). Bottlenecks in planning and producing manual, vocal, and foot responses. Unveröffentlichtes Manuskript. http://www.pashler.com/Articles/techreport/Pashler_Christian_Techreport1994.pdf

Pashler, H., & Johnston, J. C. (1989). Chronometric evidence for central postponement in temporally overlapping tasks. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41A, 19–45.CrossRef

Passingham, R. (1993). The frontal lobes and voluntary action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Perret, E. (1974). The left frontal lobe of man and the suppression of habitual responses in verbal categorical behavior. Neuropsychologia, 12, 323–330.PubMedCrossRef

Pfurtscheller, G., Flotzinger, D., & Neuper, C. (1994). Differentiation between finger, toe and tongue movement in man based on 40 Hz EEG. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 90, 456–460.PubMedCrossRef

Portier, S. J., & Galen, G. P. van (1992). Immediate vs. postponed visual feedback in practising a handwriting task. Human Movement Science, 11, 563–592.CrossRef

Portier, S. J., Galen, G. P. van, & Meulenbroek, R. G. J. (1990). Practice and the dynamics of handwriting performance: Evidence for a shift of motor programming load. Journal of Motor Behavior, 22, 474–492.PubMedCrossRef

Potter, J. M. (1980). What was the matter with Dr. Spooner? In V. A. Fromkin (Hrsg.), Errors in linguistic performance (S. 13–34). New York: Academic Press.

Povel, D., & Collard, R. (1982). Structural factors in patterned finger tapping. Acta Psychologica, 52, 107–123.PubMedCrossRef

Prablanc, C., & Jeannerod, M. (1975). Corrective saccades: Dependence on retinal reafferent signals. Vision Research, 15, 465–469.PubMedCrossRef

Prablanc, C., & Pélisson, D. (1990). Gaze saccade orienting and hand pointing are locked to their goal by quick internal loops. In M. Jeannerod (Hrsg.), Attention and performance XIII (S. 653–676). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Prinz, W. (1987). Ideo-motor action. In H. Heuer, & A. F. Sanders (Hrsg.), Perspectives on perception and action (S. 47–76). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Prinz, W. (1997). Why Donders has led us astray. In B. Hommel, & W. Prinz (Hrsg.), Theoretical issues in stimulus-response compatibility (S. 247–267). Amsterdam: Elsevier.CrossRef

Proctor, R. W., & Reeve, T. G. (1986). A caution regarding use of the hint procedure to determine whether partial stimulus information activates response. Perception and Psychophysics, 40, 110–118.PubMedCrossRef

Quinn, J. T., & Sherwood, D. E. (1983). Time requirements of changes in program and parameter variables in rapid ongoing movements. Journal of Motor Behavior, 15, 163–178.PubMedCrossRef

Rabbitt, P. (1997). Introduction: Methodologies and models in the study of executive function. In P. Rabbitt (Hrsg.), Methodology of frontal and executive function (S. 1–38). Hove: Psychology Press.

Requin, J. (1992). From action representation to movement control. In G. E. Stelmach, & J. Requin (Hrsg.), Tutorials in motor behavior II (S. 159–179). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Roberts, A. C., Robbins, T. W., & Weiskrantz, L. (1998). The prefrontal cortex: Executive and cognitive functions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef

Rochat, P., & Striano, T. (1999). Emerging self-exploration by 2-month-old infants. Developmental Science, 2, 206–218.CrossRef

Roelfsema, P. R., Engel, A. K., König, P., & Singer, W. (1997). Visuomotor integration is associated with zero time-lag synchronization among cortical areas. Nature, 385, 157–161.PubMedCrossRef

Rogers, R. D., & Monsell, S. (1995). Cost of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 124, 207–231.CrossRef

Rogers, R. D., Sahakian, B. J., Hodges, J. R., Polkey, C. E., Kennard, C., & Robbins, T. W. (1998). Dissociating executive mechanisms of task control following frontal lobe damage and Parkinson’s disease. Brain, 121, 815–842.PubMedCrossRef

Rohrer, D., Pashler, H., & Etchegaray, J. (1998). When two memories can and cannot be retrieved concurrently. Memory and Cognition, 26, 731–739.PubMedCrossRef

Rosenbaum, D. A. (1980). Human movement initiation: Specification of arm, direction and extent. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 444–474.CrossRef

Rosenbaum, D. A. (1987). Successive approximations to a model of human motor programming. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 21, 153–182.CrossRef

Rosenbaum, D. A. (1991). Human motor control. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

Rosenbaum, D. A., & Kornblum, S. (1982). A priming method for investigating the selection of motor responses. Acta Psychologica, 51, 223–243.CrossRef

Rosenbaum, D. A., & Krist, H. (1993). Vorbereitung von Bewegungen. In H. Heuer, & S. W. Keele (Hrsg.), Psychomotorik, Enzyklopädie der Psychologie, Serie Kognition (Bd. 3, S. 3–85). Göttingen: Hogrefe.

Rosenbaum, D. A., Kenny, S. B., & Derr, M. A. (1983). Hierarchical control of rapid movement sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 86–102.PubMed

Rosenbaum, D. A., Inhoff, A. W., & Gordon, A. M. (1984). Choosing between movement sequences: A hierarchical editor model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 372–393.CrossRef

Rosenbaum, D. A., Weber, R. J., Hazelett, W. M., & Hindorff, V. (1986). The parameter remapping effect in human performance: Evidence from tongue twisters and finger fumblers. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 710–725.CrossRef

Rosenbaum, D. A., Hindorff, V., & Munro, E. M. (1987). Scheduling and programming of rapid finger sequences: Tests and elaborations of the hierarchical editor model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13, 193–203.PubMed

Rosenbaum, D. A., Vaughan, J., Barnes, H. J., & Jorgensen, M. J. (1992). Time course of movement planning: Selection of hand grips for object manipulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 1058–1073.PubMed

Rosenbaum, D. A., Loukopoulos, L. D., Meulenbroek, R. G. J., Vaughan, J., & Engelbrecht, S. (1995). Planning reaches by evaluating stored postures. Psychological Review, 102, 28–67.PubMedCrossRef

Rossetti, Y., & Pisella, L. (2002). Several ‘vision for action’ systems: A guide to dissociating and integrating dorsal and ventral functions. In W. Prinz, & B. Hommel (Hrsg.), Attention und performance XIX: Common mechanisms in perception and action (S. 62–119). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Rossetti, Y., & Régnier, C. (1995). Representations in action: Pointing to a target with various representations. In B. G. Bardy, R. J. Bootsma, & Y. Guiard (Hrsg.), Studies in perception and action III (S. 233–236). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Roth, K. (1988). Investigations on the basis of the generalized motor programme hypothesis. In O. G. Meijer, & K. Roth (Hrsg.), The motor-action controversy (S. 261–288). Amsterdam: North-Holland.

Rothwell, J. C., Traub, M. M., Day, B. L., Obeso, J. A., Thomas, P. K., & Marsden, C. D. (1982). Manual motor performance in a deafferented man. Brain, 105, 515–542.PubMedCrossRef

Rovee, C. K., & Rovee, D. T. (1969). Conjugate reinforcement in infant exploratory behavior. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 8, 33–39.PubMedCrossRef

Rovee-Collier, C., Sullivan, M. W., Enright, M. K., Lucas, D., & Fagen, J. W. (1980). Reactivation of infant memory. Science, 208, 1159–1161.PubMedCrossRef

Rubinstein, J., Meyer, D. E., & Evans, J. E. (2001). Executive control of cognitive processes in task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 763–797.PubMed

Rumelhart, D. E., & Norman, D. A. (1982). Simulating a skilled typist: A study of skilled cognitive-motor performance. Cognitive Science, 6, 1–36.CrossRef

Ruthruff, E., Johnston, J. C., & Van Selst, M. (2001). Why practice reduces dual-task interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 3–21.PubMed

Ruthruff, E., Johnston, J. C., & Remington, R. W. (2009). How strategic is the central bottleneck: Can it be overcome by trying harder? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 1368–1384.PubMed

Salenius, S., Salmelin, R., Neuper, C., Pfurtscheller, G., & Hari, R. (1996). Human cortical 40 Hz rhythm is closely related to EMG rhythmicity. Neuroscience Letters, 213, 75–78.PubMedCrossRef

Sanders, A. F. (1983). Towards a model of stress and human performance. Acta Psychologica, 53, 61–97.PubMedCrossRef

Sanes, J. N., & Donoghue, J. P. (1993). Oscillations in local field potentials of the primate motor cortex during voluntary movement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 90, 4470–4474.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Sarno, K. J., & Wickens, C. D. (1995). Role of multiple resources in predicting time-sharing efficiency: Evaluation of three workload models in a multiple-task setting. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 5, 107–130.PubMedCrossRef

Schmidt, R. A. (1975). A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. Psychological Review, 82, 225–260.CrossRef

Schwarz, G. (1933). Über Rückfälligkeit bei Umgewöhnung: 2. Über Handlungsganzheiten und ihre Bedeutung für die Rückfälligkeit. Psychologische Forschung, 18, 143–190.CrossRef

Schweickert, R. (1978). A critical path generalization of the additive factor method: Analysis of a Stroop task. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 18, 105–139.CrossRef

Semjen, & Garcia-Colera, A. (1986). Planning and timing of finger-tapping sequences with a stressed element. Journal of Motor Behavior, 18, 287–322.PubMedCrossRef

Semjen, A., & Gottsdanker, R. (1991). Structural facilitation of movement sequence planning. In J. Requin, & G. E. Stelmach (Hrsg.), Tutorials in motor neuroscience (S. 397–412). Netherlands: Kluwer.CrossRef

Shaffer, L. H. (1975). Control processes in typing. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 27A, 419–432.CrossRef

Shaffer, L. H. (1991). Cognition and motor programming. In J. Requin, & G. E. Stelmach (Hrsg.), Tutorials in motor neuroscience (S. 371–383). Netherlands: Kluwer.CrossRef

Sideaway, B. (1994). The interaction of response complexity and instructional set. Journal of Motor Behavior, 26, 13–17.CrossRef

Singer, W. (1994). The organization of sensory motor representations in the neocortex: A hypothesis based on temporal coding. In C. Umiltà, & M. Moscovitch (Hrsg.), Attention and performance XV: Conscious and nonconscious information processing (S. 77–107). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Singer, W. (2011). Dynamic formation of functional networks by synchronization. Neuron, 69, 191–193.PubMedCrossRef

Smith, M. C. (1969). The effect of varying information on the psychological refractory period. Acta Psychologica, 30, 220–231.CrossRef

Spijkers, W. (1993). Sehen und Handeln. Aachen: Shaker.

Stablum, F., Leonardi, G., Mazzoldi, M., Umiltà, C., & Morra, S. (1994). Attention and control deficits following closed head injury. Cortex, 30, 603–618.PubMedCrossRef

Stelmach, G. E., & Teulings, H. (1983). Response characteristics of prepared and restructured handwriting. Acta Psychologica, 54, 51–67.CrossRef

Stelmach, G. E., Mullins, P. A., & Teulings, H. (1984). Motor programming and temporal patterns in handwriting. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 423, 144–157.PubMedCrossRef

Sternberg, S. (1969). The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders’ method. Acta Psychologica, 30, 276–315.CrossRef

Sternberg, S., Monsell, S., Knoll, R. L., & Wright, C. E. (1978). The latency and duration of rapid movement sequences: Comparisons of speech and typewriting. In G. E. Stelmach (Hrsg.), Information processing in motor control and learning (S. 117–152). New York: Academic Press.CrossRef

Sternberg, S., Wright, C. E., Knoll, R. L., & Monsell, S. (1982). Motor programs in rapid speech. In R. Cole (Hrsg.), Perception and production of fluent speech (S. 507–534). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

St James, J. D. (1990). Observations on the microstructure of response conflict. Perception and Psychophysics, 48, 517–524.CrossRef

Stoet, G., & Hommel, B. (1999). Action planning and the temporal binding of response codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1625–1640.

Stürmer, B., Leuthold, H., Schröter, H., Soetens, E., & Sommer, W. (2002). Control over location-based response activation in the Simon task: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 1345–1363.PubMed

Sudevan, P., & Taylor, D. A. (1987). The cuing and priming of cognitive operations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13, 89–103.PubMed

Tallon-Baudry, C., & Bertrand, O. (1999). Oscillatory gamma activity in humans and its role in object representation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3, 151–162.PubMedCrossRef

Taub, E., & Berman, A. J. (1968). Movement and learning in the absence of sensory feedback. In S. J. Freedman (Hrsg.), The neuropsychology of spatially oriented behavior (S. 173–192). Homewood, IL: Dorsey.

Telford, C. W. (1931). The refractory phase of voluntary and associative responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 14, 1–36.CrossRef

Terzuolo, C. A., & Viviani, P. (1980). Determinants and characteristics of motor patterns used for typing. Neuroscience, 5, 1085–1103.PubMedCrossRef

Teulings, H., Thomassen, A. J. W. M., & Galen, G. P. van (1983). Preparation of partly precued handwriting movements: The size of movement units in handwriting. Acta Psychologica, 54, 165–177.CrossRef

Teulings, H., Mullins, P. A., & Stelmach, G. E. (1986). The elementary units of programming in handwriting. In G. P. van Galen, H. S. R. Kao, & R. Hoosain (Hrsg.), Graphonomics: Contemporary research in handwriting (S. 21–32). Amsterdam: Elsevier.CrossRef

Treisman, A. M. (1996). The binding problem. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 6, 171–178.PubMedCrossRef

Treisman, A. M., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97–136.PubMedCrossRef

Ungerleider, L. G., & Mishkin, M. (1982). Two cortical visual systems. In D. Ingle, M. A. Goodale, & R. J. W. Mansfield (Hrsg.), Analysis of visual behavior (S. 549–586). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Van Selst, M., & Jolicœur, P. (1997). Decision and response. Cognitive Psychology, 33, 266–307.PubMedCrossRef

Van Selst, M., Ruthruff, E., & Johnston, J. C. (1999). Can practice eliminate the psychological refractory period? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1268–1283.PubMed

van Sonderen, J. F., & Denier, G. J. J. van der (1991). Reaction-time-dependent differences in the initial movement direction of fast goal-directed arm movements. Human Movement Science, 10, 713–726.CrossRef

van Steenbergen, H. van, Band, G. P. H., & Hommel, B. (2009). Reward counteracts conflict adaptation: Evidence for a role of affect in executive control. Psychological Science, 20, 1473–1477.PubMedCrossRef

van Steenbergen, H. van, Band, G. P. H., & Hommel, B. (2010). In the mood for adaptation: How affect regulates conflict-driven control. Psychological Science, 21, 1629–1634.PubMedCrossRef

van Steenbergen, H. van, Band, G.P.H., Hommel, B., Rombouts, S.A.R.B. und Nieuwenhuis, S. (2015). Hedonic hotspots regulate cingulate-driven adaptation to cognitive demands. Cerebral Cortex, 25, 1746–1756.

Verschoor, S. A., Spapé, M., Biro, S., & Hommel, B. (2013). From outcome prediction to action selection: Developmental change in the role of action-effect bindings. Developmental Science, 16, 801–814.PubMed

Verschoor, S. A., Weidema, M., Biro, S., & Hommel, B. (2010). Where do action goals come from? Evidence for spontaneous action-effect binding in infants. Frontiers in Psychology, 1, 201.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Verwey, W. B. (1994). Evidence for the development of concurrent processing in a sequential keypressing task. Acta Psychologica, 85, 245–262.CrossRef

Vidal, F., Bonnet, M., & Macar, F. (1991). Programming response duration in a precueing reaction time paradigm. Journal of Motor Behavior, 23, 226–234.PubMedCrossRef

Ward, L. M. (1982). Determinants of attention to local and global features of visual forms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 562–581.PubMed

Waszak, F., Hommel, B., & Allport, A. (2003). Task-switching and long-term priming: Role of episodic stimulus-task bindings in task-shift costs. Cognitive Psychology, 46, 361–413.PubMedCrossRef

Watson, J. S., & Ramey, C. T. (1972). Reactions to response-contingent stimulation in early infancy. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 18, 219–227.

Welford, A. T. (1952). The „psychological refractory period“ and the timing of high-speed performance – a review and a theory. British Journal of Psychology, 43, 2–19.

Wickelgren, W. A. (1969). Context-sensitive coding, associative memory, and serial order in (speech) behavior. Psychological Review, 76, 1–15.CrossRef

Wickens, C. D. (1980). The structure of attentional resources. In R. Nickerson (Hrsg.), Attention and performance VIII (S. 239–257). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Wickens, C. D. (1984). Processing resources in attention. In R. Parasuraman, & D. R. Davies (Hrsg.), Varieties of attention (S. 63–102). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

Wickens, C. D., & Liu, Y. (1988). Codes and modalities in multiple resources: A success and a qualification. Human Factors, 30, 599–616.PubMed

Wickens, J., Hyland, B., & Anson, G. (1994). Cortical cell assemblies: A possible mechanism for motor programs. Journal of Motor Behavior, 26, 66–82.PubMedCrossRef

Wolfe, J. M., Cave, K. R., & Franzel, S. L. (1989). Guided search: An alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 419–433.PubMed

Woodworth, R. S. (1899). The accuracy of voluntary movement. Psychological Review, 3, 1–114.

Wylie, G., & Allport, A. (2000). Task switching and the measurement of „switch costs“. Psychological Research, 63, 212–233.PubMedCrossRef

Yaniv, I., Meyer, D. E., Gordon, P. C., Huff, C. A., & Sevald, C. A. (1990). Vowel similarity, connectionist models, and syllable structure in motor programming of speech. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 1–26.CrossRef

Yantis, S. (2000). Goal-directed and stimulus-driven determinants of attentional control. In S. Monsell, & J. Driver (Hrsg.), Attention and performance XVIII: Control of cognitive processes (S. 73–103). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Zelaznik, H. N. (1978). Precuing response factors in choice reaction time: A word of caution. Journal of Motor Behavior, 10, 77–79.PubMedCrossRef

Zelaznik, H. N., & Hahn, R. (1985). Reaction time methods in the study of motor programming: The precuing of hand, digit and duration. Journal of Motor Behavior, 17, 190–218.PubMedCrossRef

Zelazo, P. D., Reznick, J. S., & Piñon, D. E. (1995). Response control and the execution of verbal rules. Developmental Psychology, 31, 508–517.CrossRef

Zießler, M., Hänel, K., & Hoffmann, J. (1988). Die Programmierung struktureller Eigenschaften von Bewegungsfolgen. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 196, 371–388.PubMed

Zillig, M. (1926). Die Übung der Umstellung. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 100, 18–49.

Springer Professional

18. Planung und exekutive Kontrolle von Handlungen

Zusammenfassung

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Premium Partner