Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Education and Information Technologies
Erschienen in: Education and Information Technologies 6/2016

10.06.2015

Student observations: Introducing iPads into university classrooms

verfasst von: Leslie J. Wardley, Colin F. Mang

Erschienen in: Education and Information Technologies | Ausgabe 6/2016

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This paper explores the growing trend of using mobile technology in university classrooms, exploring the use of tablets in particular, to identify learning benefits faced by students. Students, acting on their efficacy beliefs, make decisions regarding technology’s influence in improving their education. We construct a theoretical model in which internal and external factors affect a student’s self-efficacy which in turn affects the extent of adoption of a device for educational purposes. Through qualitative survey responses of university students who were given an Apple iPad to keep for the duration of a university course we find high levels of self-efficacy leading to positive views of the technology’s learning enhancement capabilities. Student observations on the practicality of the technology, off-topic use and its effects, communication, content, and perceived market advantage of using a tablet are also explored.
Vorheriger Artikel Relationship between gender identity, perceived social support for using computers, and computer self-efficacy and value beliefs of undergraduate students
Nächster Artikel Self-regulated learning and the role of ePortfolios in business studies

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Literatur
Aguilar-Roca, N. M., Williams, A. E., & O’Dowd, D. K. (2012). The impact of laptop-free zones on student performance and attitudes in large lectures. Computers & Education, 59(4), 1300–1308.CrossRef
Alvarez, C., Alarcon, R., & Nussbaum, M. (2011a). Implementing collaborative learning activities in the classroom supported by one-to-one mobile computing: a design-based process. Journal of Systems and Software, 84(11), 1961–1976.CrossRef
Alvarez, C., Brown, C., & Nussbaum, M. (2011b). Comparative study of netbooks and tablet PCs for fostering face-to-face collaborative learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 834–844.CrossRef
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behaviour change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215.CrossRef
Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28(2), 117–148.CrossRef
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
Barak, M., Lipson, A., & Lerman, S. (2006). Wireless laptops as means for promoting active learning in lecture halls. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38(3), 245–263.CrossRef
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of Use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–339.CrossRef
Dewey, J. (1944). Democracy and education. New York: Macmillan.
Eichenlaub, N., Gabel, L., Jakubek, D., McCarthy, G., Wang, W. (2011). Project iPad: Investigating tablet integration in learning and libraries at Ryerson University. Computers in Libraries, 17–21.
El-Hussein, M. M., & Cronje, J. C. (2010). Defining mobile learning in the higher education landscape. Educational Technology & Society, 13(3), 12–21.
Fischman, J., & Keller, J. (2011). College tech goes mobile. Chronicle of Higher Education, 58(1), 50.
Gawelek, M. A., Spataro, M., & Komarny, P. (2011). Mobile perspectives: on iPads why mobile? EDUCAUSE Review, 46(2), 28–32.
Goral, T. (2011). Take II tablets. University Business, 46–49.
Hartwick, J., & Barki, H. (1994). Explaining the role of user participation in information system use. Management Science, 40, 40–465.CrossRef
Hu, P. J., Chau, P. Y. K., Sheng, O. R. L., & Tam, K. Y. (1999). Examining the technology acceptance model using physician acceptance of telemedicine technology. Journal of Management Information Systems, 16(2), 91–112.CrossRef
Igbaria, M., & Iivari, J. (1995). The effects of self-efficacy on computer usage. Omega, 23(6), 587–605.CrossRef
Junco, R. (2012). In-class multitasking and academic performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(6), 2236–2243.CrossRef
Junco, R., & Cotten, S. R. (2012). No a 4 U: the relationship between multitasking and academic performance. Computers & Education, 59(2), 505–514.CrossRef
Kay, R. H., & Lauricella, S. (2011a). Exploring the benefits and challenges of using laptop computers in higher education classrooms: a formative analysis. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 37(1), 1–18.
Kay, R. H., & Lauricella, S. (2011b). Unstructured vs structured use of laptops in higher education. Journal of Information Technology Education, 10, IIP33–IIP42.
Keller, J. (2011). The slow-motion mobile campus. Chronicle of Higher Education, 57(36), B4–B6.
Kinash, S., Brand, J., & Mathew, T. (2012). Challenging mobile learning discourse through research: student perceptions of blackboard mobile learn and iPads. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(4), 639–655.CrossRef
Kirschner, P., & Karpinski, A. (2010). Facebook and academic performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 1237–1245.CrossRef
Lam, J., Yau, J., & Cheung, S. K. (2010). A review of mobile learning in the mobile age. In Hybrid Learning (pp. 306–315). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
Mang, C. F., & Wardley, L. J. (2012). Effective adoption of tablets in post-secondary education: recommendations based on a trial of iPads in university classes. Journal of Information Technology Education Innovations in Practice, 11, 301–317.
Mang, C.F., & Wardley, L. J. (2013). Student perceptions of using tablet technology in post-secondary classes. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 39 (4).
Mathieson, K. (1991). Predicting user intentions: comparing the technology acceptance model with the theory of planned behavior. Information Systems Research, 2(3), 173–191.CrossRef
Maxwell, N. G. (2007). From facebook to Folsom prison blues: how banning laptops in the classroom made me a better law school teacher. Richmond Journal of Law & Technology, 14(2), 1–43.
Oblinger, D. (2003). Boomers gen-xers millennials. EDUCAUSE Review, 500(4), 37–47.
Percival, J., & Percival, N. (2009). A case of a laptop learning campus: how do technology choices affect perceptions? ALT-J Research in Learning Technology, 17(3), 173–186.CrossRef
Rossing, J. P., Miller, W. M., Cecil, A. K., & Stamper, S. E. (2012). iLearning: the future of higher education? Student perceptions on learning with mobile tablets. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 12(2), 1–26.
Schools Release iPad Studies. (2011). BizEd Magazine, 60–63.
Scott, R. (2011). Tableau economique: teaching economics with a tablet computer. Journal of Economic Education, 42(2), 175–180.CrossRef
Singh, A., & Ranjan, J. (2014). A framework for mobile apps in colleges and universities: Data mining perspective, Education and Information Technologies [online]. Retrieved August 28, 2014.
Taylor, S., & Todd, P. A. (1995a). Assessing IT usage: the role of prior experience. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 561–570.CrossRef
Taylor, S., & Todd, P. A. (1995b). Understanding information technology usage: a test of competing models. Information Systems Research, 6(4), 144–176.CrossRef
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478.
Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157–178.
Voogt, J., Erstad, O., Dede, C., & Mishra, P. (2013). Challenges to learning and schooling in the digital networked world of the 21st century. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(5), 403–413.CrossRef
Vuojärvi, H., Isomäki, H., & Hynes, D. (2010). Domestication of a laptop on a wireless university campus: a case study. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(2), 250–267.CrossRef
Weider, B. (2011). iPads could hinder teaching, professors say. Chronicle of Higher Education, 57(28), A22–A23.
Wong, W. (2012). Tools of the Trade: how mobile learning devices are changing the face of higher education. Community College Journal, 82(5), 54–61.
Wood, E., Zivcakova, L., Gentile, P., Archer, K., De Pasquale, D., & Nosko, A. (2012). Examining the impact of off-task multi-tasking with technology on real-time classroom learning. Computers & Education, 58(1), 365–374.CrossRef
Zimmerman, B., Bandura, A., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1992). Self-motivation for academic attainment: the role of self-efficacy beliefs and personal goal setting. American Educational Research Journal, 29(3), 663–676.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Student observations: Introducing iPads into university classrooms
verfasst von
Leslie J. Wardley
Colin F. Mang
Publikationsdatum
10.06.2015
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Education and Information Technologies / Ausgabe 6/2016
Print ISSN: 1360-2357
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7608
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-015-9414-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2016

Education and Information Technologies 6/2016 Zur Ausgabe

OriginalPaper

Social and emotional learning around technology in a cross-cultural, elementary classroom

OriginalPaper

Seeing the system: Dynamics and complexity of technology integration in secondary schools

OriginalPaper

Potential use of Augmented Reality in LIS education

OriginalPaper

Examining middle school students’ views on text bullying

OriginalPaper

An improved botanical search application for middle- and high-school students

OriginalPaper

Performance and perception in the flipped classroom