nach oben

Erschienen in:

18.06.2020 | Original Paper

The effect of silica nanoparticles on polysulfone–polyethylene glycol (PSF/PEG) composite membrane on gas separation and rheological properties of nanocomposites

verfasst von: Iman Salahshoori, Danial Nasirian, Niloufar Rashidi, Md Kamal Hossain, Ali Hatami, Majid Hassanzadeganroudsari

Erschienen in: Polymer Bulletin | Ausgabe 6/2021

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Currently, composite membranes play a significant role in the separation of acidic gases. Inorganic nanoparticles are used in these composite membranes to enhance the thermal and chemical properties of composites. In this study, polysulfone–polyethylene glycol/silica (PSF–PEG/silica) nanocomposite membranes were investigated for the purpose of improvement of the N₂, O₂, CH₄ and CO₂ separation properties. The results of gas permeability in nanocomposite membranes showed that the PSF/PEG 10,000 membrane, with 20 wt% of silica, provided the best gas separation properties. CO₂ permeability in the nanocomposite membrane with 20 wt% of silica was 13.36 Barrer. In addition, the ideal selectivity for CO₂/N₂ paired gases in this membrane was 45.76, which was higher than the values obtained in the pure PSF membrane and the composite membrane with 20 wt% PEG 10,000. In addition, scanning electron microscopy, infrared spectroscopy, thermal gravimetric analysis, X-ray diffraction, differential scanning calorimetry and a tensile strength test were all used to examine the membrane structure and morphology of the nanocomposite. Finally, mechanical rheometry was used to study the rheological properties of hybrid nanosized composites and the effect of nanoparticle percentage on them.

Vorheriger Artikel Curing kinetics and ionic interactions in layered double hydroxides–nitrile rubber Mg–Al-LDHs–XNBR composites

Nächster Artikel Effect of entanglement upon branching on dispersibility, β-nucleating and mechanically strengthening ability of polystyrene in isotactic polypropylene

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Ahn J, Chung W-J, Pinnau I, Guiver M (2008) Polysulfone/silica nanoparticle mixed-matrix membranes for gas separation. J Membr Sci 314(1):123–133CrossRef

Arya A, Sharma A (2018) Effect of Salt concentration on dielectric properties of Li-ion conducting blend polymer electrolytes. J Mater Sci: Mater Electron. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-018-9905-3CrossRef

Basu S, Odena A, Vankelecom I (2010) Asymmetric matrimid^®/[Cu₃(BTC)₂] mixed-matrix membranes for gas separations. J Membr Sci 362:478–487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2010.07.005CrossRef

Bicerano J, Douglas JF, Brune DA (1999) Model for the viscosity of particle dispersions. J Macromol Sci Part C 39(4):561–642CrossRef

Bos A, Pünt I, Wessling M, Strathmann H (1999) CO₂-induced plasticization phenomena in glassy polymers. J Membr Sci 155:67–78CrossRef

Cassagnau P (2008) Melt rheology of organoclay and fumed silica nanocomposites. Polymer 49:2183–2196CrossRef

Cassagnau P, Melis F (2003) Non-linear viscoelastic behaviour and modulus recovery in silica filled polymers. Polymer 44:6607–6615CrossRef

Chiou JS, Maeda Y, Paul DR (1987) Gas permeation in polyethersulfone. J Appl Polym Sci 33:1823–1828. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.1987.070330533CrossRef

Corrado T, Guo R (2020) Macromolecular design strategies toward tailoring free volume in glassy polymers for high performance gas separation membranes. Mol Syst Des Eng 5(1):22–48CrossRef

10.

Dong G, Li H, Chen V (2013) Challenges and opportunities for mixed-matrix membranes for gas separation. J Mater Chem A 1:4610–4630. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3TA00927KCrossRef

11.

Douglas JF, Garboczi EJ (1995) Intrinsic viscosity and the polarizability of particles having a wide range of shapes. Adv Chem Phys 91:85–154

12.

Elias L, Fenouillot F, Majesté J-C, Alcouffe P, Cassagnau P (2008) Immiscible polymer blends stabilized with nano-silica particles: rheology and effective interfacial tension. Polymer 49:4378–4385CrossRef

13.

Elias L, Fenouillot F, Majesté J-C, Cassagnau P (2007) Morphology and rheology of immiscible polymer blends filled with silica nanoparticles. Polymer 48:6029–6040CrossRef

14.

Fu S-Y, Sun Z, Huang P, Li Y-Q, Hu N (2019) Some basic aspects of polymer nanocomposites: a critical review. Nano Mater Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoms.2019.02.006CrossRef

15.

Ge L, Zhu Z, Rudolph V (2011) Enhanced gas permeability by fabricating functionalized multi-walled carbon nanotubes and polyethersulfone nanocomposite membrane. Sep Purif Technol 78:76–82CrossRef

16.

Haghtalab A, Marzban R (2011) Viscoelastic properties of nanosilica-filled polypropylene in the molten state: effect of particle size. Adv Polym Technol 30:203–218CrossRef

17.

Hatami A, Salahshoori I, Rashidi N, Nasirian D (2019) The effect of ZIF-90 particle in Pebax/PSF composite membrane on the transport properties of CO₂, CH₄ and N₂ gases by molecular dynamics simulation method. Chin J Chem Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjche.2019.12.011CrossRef

18.

Heidari A, Heidari N, Godarzvand Chegini M, Amiri R, Khademi Jahromi F, Ghorbani M (2012) A new method for synthesis of nanocomposite membranes for separation of gases. Adv Sci Lett. https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2012.2176CrossRef

19.

Heidary M, Jafari SH, Khonakdar HA, Wagenknecht U, Heinrich G, Boldt R (2013) Effect of end-capped nanosilica on mechanical properties and microstructure of LLLDPE/EVA blends. J Appl Polym Sci 127:1172–1179. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.37583CrossRef

20.

Hoffmann B, Dietrich C, Thomann R, Friedrich C, Mülhaupt R (2000) Morphology and rheology of polystyrene nanocomposites based upon organoclay. Macromol Rapid Commun 21:57–61CrossRef

21.

Huang X, Fang X, Lu Z, Chen S (2009) Reinforcement of polysiloxane with superhydrophobic nanosilica. J Mater Sci 44:4522–4530CrossRef

22.

Jeffrey DJ, Acrivos A (1976) The rheological properties of suspensions of rigid particles. AIChE J 22:417–432CrossRef

23.

Jiang L, Lam Y, Tam K, Chua T, Sim G, Ang L (2005) Strengthening acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene (ABS) with nano-sized and micron-sized calcium carbonate. Polymer 46:243–252CrossRef

24.

Jiang L, Zhang J, Wolcott MP (2007) Comparison of polylactide/nano-sized calcium carbonate and polylactide/montmorillonite composites: reinforcing effects and toughening mechanisms. Polymer 48:7632–7644CrossRef

25.

Jiang LY, Chung TS, Rajagopalan R (2007) Matrimid^®/MgO mixed matrix membranes for pervaporation. AIChE J 53:1745–1757CrossRef

26.

Joly C, Goizet S, Schrotter J-C, Sanchez Marcano J, Escoubes M (1997) Sol–gel polyimide-silica composite membrane: gas transport properties. J Membr Sci 130(1):63–74CrossRef

27.

Kaniappan K, Latha S (2011) Certain investigations on the formulation and characterization of polystyrene/poly(methyl methacrylate) blends. Int J ChemTech Res 3:708–715

28.

Khonakdar H (2015) Dynamic mechanical analysis and thermal properties of LLDPE/EVA/modified silica nanocomposites. Compos Part B Eng 76:343–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.02.031CrossRef

29.

Khosravi T, Mosleh S, Bakhtiari O, Mohammadi T (2012) Mixed matrix membranes of Matrimid 5218 loaded with zeolite 4A for pervaporation separation of water–isopropanol mixtures. Chem Eng Res Des 90:2353–2363CrossRef

30.

Kim JH, Lee YM (2001) Gas permeation properties of poly(amide-6-b-ethylene oxide)–silica hybrid membranes. J Membr Sci 193:209–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(01)00514-2CrossRef

31.

Li W, Karger-Kocsis J, Schlarb AK (2009) Dispersion of TiO₂ particles in PET/PP/TiO₂ and PET/PP/PP-g-MA/TiO₂ composites prepared with different blending procedures. Macromol Mater Eng 294:582–589CrossRef

32.

Li Y, Guan H-M, Chung T-S, Kulprathipanja S (2006) Effects of novel silane modification of zeolite surface on polymer chain rigidification and partial pore blockage in polyethersulfone (PES)–zeolite a mixed matrix membranes. J Membr Sci 275:17–28CrossRef

33.

Lipatov YS, Nesterov A, Ignatova T, Nesterov D (2002) Effect of polymer–filler surface interactions on the phase separation in polymer blends. Polymer 43:875–880CrossRef

34.

Lipatov YS, Shumsky V, Getmanchuk I, Gorbatenko A (1982) Rheology of polymer blends. Rheol Acta 21:270–279CrossRef

35.

Manatunga D, de Silva R, De Silva KM (2015) Double layer approach to create durable superhydrophobicity on cotton fabric using nano silica and auxiliary non fluorinated materials. Appl Surf Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.11.068CrossRef

36.

Mannan HA, Mukhtar H, Murugesan T, Nasir R, Mohshim DF, Mushtaq A (2013) Recent applications of polymer blends in gas separation membranes. Chem Eng Technol 36:1838–1846. https://doi.org/10.1002/ceat.201300342CrossRef

37.

Mascia L, Lavorgna M (2012) Nanostructured polymer composites by sol–gel method. Wiley encyclopedia of composites. Wiley, Hoboken. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118097298.weoc158CrossRef

38.

Meera A, Said S, Grohens Y, Thomas S (2009) Nonlinear viscoelastic behavior of silica-filled natural rubber nanocomposites. J Phys Chem C 113:17997–18002CrossRef

39.

Moaddeb M, Koros WJ (1996) Effects of colloidal silica incorporation on oxygen/nitrogen separation properties of ceramic-supported 6FDA-IPDA thin films. J Membr Sci 111:283–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/0376-7388(95)00253-7CrossRef

40.

Moaddeb M, Koros WJ (1997) Gas transport properties of thin polymeric membranes in the presence of silicon dioxide particles. J Membr Sci 125:143–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(96)00251-7CrossRef

41.

Münstedt H, Köppl T, Triebel C (2010) Viscous and elastic properties of poly (methyl methacrylate) melts filled with silica nanoparticles. Polymer 51:185–191CrossRef

42.

Nasirian D, Salahshoori I, Sadeghi M, Rashidi N, Hassanzadeganroudsari M (2019) Investigation of the gas permeability properties from polysulfone/polyethylene glycol composite membrane. Polym Bull. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00289-019-03031-3CrossRef

43.

Nazockdast E, Nazockdast H, Goharpey F (2008) Linear and nonlinear melt-state viscoelastic properties of polypropylene/organoclay nanocomposites. Polym Eng Sci 48:1240–1249CrossRef

44.

Nistor C, Shishatskiy S, Popa M, Nunes SP (2009) Organic–inorganic CO₂ selective membranes prepared by the sol–gel process separation. Sci Technol 44:3392–3411. https://doi.org/10.1080/01496390903212698CrossRef

45.

Osman MA, Atallah A (2006) Effect of the particle size on the viscoelastic properties of filled polyethylene. Polymer 47:2357–2368CrossRef

46.

Pandey P, Chauhan RS (2001) Membranes for gas separation. Prog Polym Sci 26:853–893. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6700(01)00009-0CrossRef

47.

Park HB, Lee YM (2008) Polymeric membrane materials and potential use in gas separation. Adv Membr Technol Appl. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470276280.ch24CrossRef

48.

Pourafshari Chenar M, Rajabi H, Pakizeh M, Sadeghi M, Bolverdi A (2013) Effect of solvent type on the morphology and gas permeation properties of polysulfone–silica nanocomposite membranes. J Polym Res 20:216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10965-013-0216-3CrossRef

49.

Rafiq S, Mana Z, Maulud A, Muhammad N, Maitra S (2012) Separation of CO2 from CH4 using polysulfone/polyimide silica nanocomposite membranes. Sep Purif Technol 90:162–172CrossRef

50.

Rao BG, Mukherjee D, Reddy BM (2017) Chapter 1—novel approaches for preparation of nanoparticles. In: Ficai D, Grumezescu AM (eds) Nanostructures for novel therapy. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-323-46142-9.00001-3CrossRef

51.

Runt J, Huang J (2002) Chapter 8—polymer blends and copolymers. In: Cheng SZD (ed) Handbook of thermal analysis and calorimetry, vol 3. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 273–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1573-4374(02)80011-5CrossRef

52.

Sadeghi M, Khanbabaei G, Dehaghani AHS, Sadeghi M, Aravand MA, Akbarzade M, Khatti S (2008) Gas permeation properties of ethylene vinyl acetate–silica nanocomposite membranes. J Membr Sci 322:423–428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2008.05.077CrossRef

53.

Sadeghi M, Mehdi Talakesh M, Ghalei B, Shafiei M (2013) Preparation, characterization and gas permeation properties of a polycaprolactone based polyurethane–silica nanocomposite membrane. J Membr Sci 427:21–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2012.07.036CrossRef

54.

Sadeghi M, Semsarzadeh MA, Barikani M, Pourafshari Chenar M (2011) Gas separation properties of polyether-based polyurethane–silica nanocomposite membranes. J Membr Sci 376:188–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2011.04.021CrossRef

55.

Sadeghi M, Semsarzadeh MA, Moadel H (2009) Enhancement of the gas separation properties of polybenzimidazole (PBI) membrane by incorporation of silica nano particles. J Membr Sci 331:21–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2008.12.073CrossRef

56.

Saffar A, Jalali Dil E, Carreau PJ, Ajji A, Kamal MR (2016) Phase behavior of binary blends of PP/PP-g-AA: limitations of the conventional characterization techniques. Polym Int 65:508–515. https://doi.org/10.1002/pi.5082CrossRef

57.

Kentish SE, Scholes CA, Stevens GW (2008) Carbon dioxide separation through polymeric membrane systems for flue gas applications. Recent Patents Chem Eng 1(1):52–66CrossRef

58.

Semsarzadeh MA, Ghalei B (2012) Characterization and gas permeability of polyurethane and polyvinyl acetate blend membranes with polyethylene oxide–polypropylene oxide block copolymer. J Membr Sci 401–402:97–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2012.01.035CrossRef

59.

Setiawan WK, Chiang K-Y (2019) Silica applied as mixed matrix membrane inorganic filler for gas separation: a review. Sustain Environ Res 29:32CrossRef

60.

Singh LP, Agarwal SK, Bhattacharyya S, Sharma U, Ahalawat S (2011) Preparation of silica nanoparticles and its beneficial role in cementitious materials. Nanomater Nanotechnol. https://doi.org/10.5772/50950CrossRef

61.

Sridhar S, Smitha B, Aminabhavi TM (2007) Separation of carbon dioxide from natural gas mixtures through polymeric membranes—a review. Sep Purif Rev 36:113–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/15422110601165967CrossRef

62.

Sternstein S, Zhu A-J (2002) Reinforcement mechanism of nanofilled polymer melts as elucidated by nonlinear viscoelastic behavior. Macromolecules 35:7262–7273CrossRef

63.

Sun S, Li C, Zhang L, Du H, Burnell-Gray J (2006) Effects of surface modification of fumed silica on interfacial structures and mechanical properties of poly (vinyl chloride) composites. Eur Polym J 42:1643–1652CrossRef

64.

Thareja P, Velankar S (2008) Rheology of immiscible blends with particle-induced drop clusters. Rheol Acta 47:189–200CrossRef

65.

Uemura T et al (2015) Mixing of immiscible polymers using nanoporous coordination templates. Nat Commun 6:7473. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8473PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

66.

Yang H-C, Hou J, Chen V, Xu Z-K (2016) Surface and interface engineering for organic–inorganic composite membranes. J Mater Chem A 4:9716–9729. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6TA02844FCrossRef

67.

Yang H et al (2008) Rheology and phase structure of PP/EPDM/SiO₂ ternary composites. Eur Polym J 44:113–123CrossRef

68.

Yao X et al (2009) Interface structure of poly (ethylene terephthalate)/silica nanocomposites. Polymer 50:1251–1256CrossRef

69.

Zhang Q, Archer LA (2002) Poly (ethylene oxide)/silica nanocomposites: structure and rheology. Langmuir 18:10435–10442CrossRef

70.

Zhong Y, Wang S-Q (2003) Exfoliation and yield behavior in nanodispersions of organically modified montmorillonite clay. J Rheol 47:483–495CrossRef

Titel: The effect of silica nanoparticles on polysulfone–polyethylene glycol (PSF/PEG) composite membrane on gas separation and rheological properties of nanocomposites
verfasst von: Iman Salahshoori
Danial Nasirian
Niloufar Rashidi
Md Kamal Hossain
Ali Hatami
Majid Hassanzadeganroudsari
Publikationsdatum: 18.06.2020
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Polymer Bulletin / Ausgabe 6/2021
Print ISSN: 0170-0839
Elektronische ISSN: 1436-2449
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00289-020-03255-8

Premium Partner

Marktübersichten

Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen.

Zur Marktübersicht

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2021

Synthesis of carbazole-based polymer derived N-enriched porous carbon for dyes sorption

Preparation of semi-interpenetrating silk fibroin–polyacrylamide nanogels

Thermally reversible shape transformation of nano-patterned PNIPAAm hydrogel

Curing kinetics and ionic interactions in layered double hydroxides–nitrile rubber Mg–Al-LDHs–XNBR composites

Synthesis and characterization of β-cyclodextrin centered polysiloxane star polymers

Investigation of gelatin/chitosan as potential biodegradable polymer films on swelling behavior and methylene blue release kinetics

Premium Partner

Marktübersichten