nach oben

Technology, Knowledge and Learning

Erschienen in:

18.11.2021 | Original research

The Effect of Using Student Response System on Achievement and Achievement Emotions in An English Course

verfasst von: Yafes Can, Salih Bardakci, Esma Emmioğlu Sarikaya

Erschienen in: Technology, Knowledge and Learning | Ausgabe 1/2023

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

This study investigates the effect of student response system (SRS) on students’ achievement and achievement emotions in an English course. The participants were 9^th grade students (n = 83, 40 female and 43 male) attending a high school in Turkey. Study involved one experiment and two control groups. In the experimental group, SRS was used to ask questions and to provide immediate feedback to the students. Paper and pencil form of the same questions (that were used in the experimental group) were asked to the students in the control group 1 and immediate feedback was provided. These questions were not used in the control group 2. Before and after the implementation, the English Achievement Test and Class Related and Test Related Achievement Emotions Questionnaires were administered to the experimental and control groups. Mixed ANOVA was used to examine the within and between group differences. Semi-structured interviews were carried out with experimental group students. The results showed that using an SRS had statistically significant effect on students' achievement in English. In terms of the achievement emotions, the SRS had a statistically significant effect on decreasing students’ test anxiety. The SRS and using questions and immediate feedback in a paper and pencil format positively impacted students’ class-related boredom and enjoyment, and test relief. The results of the interviews supported these findings. Students reported that lessons with SRS were more enjoyable and SRS helped them to learn the subject matter better. They also reported that SRS helped them for the self-assessment of their progress. The findings of the study also showed that technical problems that arise from the lack of internet infrastructure might cause time management problems during the implementation of SRS.

Vorheriger Artikel Education Data Mining on PISA 2015 Best Ranked Countries: What Makes the Students go Well

Nächster Artikel Examining the Emotional Semantic Orientation of Gifted Students Towards the Flipped Learning Model

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Addison, S., Wright, A., & Milner, R. (2009). Using clickers to improve student engagement and performance in an introductory biochemistry class. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 37(2), 84–91. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.20264CrossRef

Agbatogun, A. O. (2013). Comparative effect of interactive mobiles (clickers) and communicative approach on the learning outcomes of the educationally disadvantaged Nigerian pupils in ESL classrooms. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Edinburgh University.

Ahmad, J. (2012). English language teaching (ELT) and integration of media technology. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 47, 924–929. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.758CrossRef

Akgün, A., Gönen, S., & Aydin, M. (2007). İlköğretim fen ve matematik öğretmenliği öğrencilerinin kaygı düzeylerinin bazı değişkenlere göre incelenmesi. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 20(20), 283–299. https://doi.org/10.17755/esosder.17797

Akpınar, B., & Aydın, B. (2009). Çok duyulu (Multisensory) yabancı dil öğretimi. Tubav Bilim Dergisi, 99–106.

Altun, M. (2015). The integration of technology into foreign language teaching. International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, 6(1), 22–27.

Amiri, M., & Ghonsooly, B. (2015). The Relationship between English learning anxiety and the students’ achievement on examinations. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 6(4), 855–865. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0604.20

Artino, A. R., Holmboe, E. S., & Durning, S. J. (2012). Can achievement emotions be used to better understand motivation, learning, and performance in medical education? Medical Teacher, 34(3), 240–244. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2012.643265CrossRef

Aşıksoy, G., & Sorakin, Y. (2018). The effects of clicker-aided flipped classroom model on learning achievement, physics anxiety and students’ perceptions. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching, 5(2), 334–346.

Aslan, B., & Şeker, H. (2017). Interactive response systems (irs) socrative application sample. Journal of Education and Learning, 6(1), 167–174.CrossRef

Awedh, M. H., Mueen, A., Zafar, B., & Manzoor, U. (2014). Using socrative and smartphones for the support of collaborative learning. International Journal on Integrating Technology in Education (IJITE), 3(4), 17–24. https://doi.org/10.5121/ijite.2014.3402CrossRef

Aydin, S. (2009). Test anxiety among foreign language learners: A review of literature. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 5(1), 127–137.

Aydin, S. (2013). Teachers’ perceptions about the use of computers in EFL teaching and learning: The case of Turkey. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 26(3), 214–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2012.654495CrossRef

Aydin, S., & Zengin, B. (2008). Yabancı dil öğreniminde kaygı: Bir literatür özeti. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 4(1), 81–94.

Balta, N., & Tzafilkou, K. (2019). Using socrative software for instant formative feedback in physics courses. Education and Information Technologies, 24(1), 307–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9773-8CrossRef

Baran, G., & Halici, P. (2006). Çocuklarda yabancı dil eğitimi. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 24, 44–52.

Bardakcı, S. & Keser, H. (2017). Bilişim teknolojilerinin eğitime entegrasyonu. Nobel Yayıncılık.

Barrett, M. S., Bornsen, S. E., Erickson, S. L. S. L., Markey, V., Spierig, K., & Spiering, K. (2005). The personal response system as a teaching aid. Communication Teacher, 19(3), 89–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/14704620500201806CrossRef

Baz, F. Ç. (2016). Teknik, donanım ve içerik yönüyle FATİH projesinin değerlendirilmesi. Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilmler Enstitüsü Elektronik Dergisi, 7(15).

Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588–606. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588CrossRef

Blasco-Arcas, L., Buil, I., Hernández-Ortega, B., Sese, F. J., Hernandez-Ortega, B., & Sese, F. J. (2013). Using clickers in class. The role of interactivity, active collaborative learning and engagement in learning performance. Computers and Education, 62, 102–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.019CrossRef

Buil, I., Catalán, S., Martínez, E., Catalan, S., & Martinez, E. (2016). Do clickers enhance learning? A control-value theory approach. Computers and Education, 103, 170–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.10.009CrossRef

Cain, J., & Robinson, E. (2008). A primer on audience response systems: Current applications and future considerations. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education. https://doi.org/10.5688/aj720477CrossRef

Caldwell, J. E. (2007). Clickers in the large classroom: Current research and best-practice tips. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 6(1), 9–20. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.06-12-0205CrossRef

Can, A. (2017). SPSS ile bilimsel araştırma sürecinde nicel veri analizi. Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık.

Can, Y., Bardakci, S., & Sarıkaya, E. E. (2020). Başarı duyguları anketinin Türk kültürüne uyarlanması. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 28(2), 673–693. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.697110

Cardoso, W. (2011). Learning a foreign language with a learner response system: The students’ perspective. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24(5), 393–417. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2011.567354CrossRef

Çelik, S. (2015). Investıgatıng the effect of student response system supported thınk-paır-share pedagogy on preparatory school efl students’ vocabulary achievement. [Unpublished master thesis]. ODTU.

Coca, D. M. (2013). Software socrative and smartphones as tools for implementation of basic processes of active physics learning in classroom: An initial feasibility study with prospective teachers. European Journal of Physics Education, 4(2), 17–24. https://doi.org/10.20308/ejpe.04753CrossRef

Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G., & Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2010). Sosyal bilimler için çok değişkenli istatistik: SPSS ve LISREL uygulamaları. Pegem Akademi.

Connor, E. (2009). Perceptions and uses of clicker technology. Journal of Electronic Resources in Medical Libraries, 6(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/15424060802705145CrossRef

Costello, P. (2010). A cost-effective classroom response system. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(6), 153–154. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01118.xCrossRef

Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: qualitive, quantative, and mixed methods approaches (Third Edit). SAGE.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method approached (Fifth Edit). SAGE.

Crews, T. B., Ducate, L., Rathel, J. M., Heid, K., & Bishoff, S. T. (2011). Clickers in the classroom: Transforming students into active learners. ECAR Research Bulletin, 9, 1–12.

Crouch, C. H., & Mazur, E. (2001). Peer instruction: Ten years of experience and results. American Journal of Physic, 69(9), 970–977. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1374249CrossRef

Cutrim, E. S. (2008). Using a voting system in conjunction with interactive whiteboard technology to enhance learning in the English language classroom. Computers and Education, 50(1), 338–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.07.001CrossRef

Daniels, L. M., Stupnisky, R. H., Pekrun, R., Haynes, T. L., Perry, R. P., Newall, N. E., Tara, L. H., Perry, R. P., Newall, N. E., Haynes, T. L., Perry, R. P., & Newall, N. E. (2009). A longitudinal analysis of achievement hoals: From affective antecedents to emotional effects and achievement outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(4), 948–963.CrossRef

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 13(3), 319–339. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008CrossRef

DeBourg, G. A. (2008). Use of classroom “clickers” to promote acquisition of advanced reasoning skills. Nurse Education in Practice, 8(2), 76–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2007.02.002CrossRef

Demirel, Ö. (2014). Eğitimde program geliştirme. Pegem Akademi Yayınclık.

Demirpolat, B. C. (2015). Türkiye’nin yabancı dil öğretimi ile imtihanı, sorunlar ve çözüm önerileri. Siyaset, Ekonomi ve Toplum Araştırmaları Vakfı, 1–24.

Dervan, P. (2013). Increasing in-class student engagement using Socrative (an online Student Response System). International Conference on Engaging Pedagogy.

Dihoff, R. E., Brosvic, G. M., Epstein, M. L., & Cook, M. J. (2004). Provision of feedback during preparation for academic testing: Learning is enhanced by immediate but not delayed feedback. The Psychological Record, 54, 207–231.CrossRef

Dursun, Ş., & Bindak, R. (2011). İlköğretim II. kademe öğrencilerinin matematik kaygılarının incelenmesi. CÜ Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 35(1), 18–21.

Filer, D. (2010). Using technology to increase classroom participation. Nursing Education Perspectives, 31(4), 247–250.

Gök, T. (2011). Using the classroom response system to enhance students’ learning and classroom interactivity. Eurasian Journal of Education Research, 45(45), 49–68.

Golonka, E. M., Bowles, A. R., Frank, V. M., Richardson, D. L., & Freynik, S. (2014). Technologies for foreign language learning: A review of technology types and their effectiveness. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(1), 70–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2012.700315CrossRef

Güler, N. (2014). Eğitimde ölçme ve değerlendirme. Pegem Akademi.

Habela, C., & Stubbs, M. (2014). Mobile phone voting for participation and engagement in a large compulsory law course. Research in Learning Technology. https://doi.org/10.5204/intjfyhe.v4i1.156CrossRef

Hadfield, O. D., & Maddux, C. D. (1988). Cognitive style and mathematics anxiety among high school students. Psychology in the Schools, 25, 75–83.CrossRef

Hedgcock, W. H., & Rouwenhorst, R. M. (2014). Response systems as a tool for feedback. 22(2), 16–25.

Hoekstra, A., & Mollborn, S. (2012). How clicker use facilitates existing pedagogical practices in higher education: Data from interdisciplinary research on student response systems. Learning, Media and Technology, 37(3), 303–320.CrossRef

Hoopingarner, D. (2011). Best practices in technology and language teaching. Language and Linguistics Compass, 3(1), 222–235. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2008.00123.xCrossRef

Horwitz, E. K. (2010). Foreign and second language anxiety. Language Teaching, 43(2), 154–167. https://doi.org/10.1017/s026144480999036xCrossRef

Ifenthaler, D. (2015). Effects of experimentally induced emotions on model-based reasoning. Learning and Individual Differences, 43, 191–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.09.003CrossRef

Ismail, N. M. (2015). EFL Saudi students’ class emotions and their contributions to their english achievement at Taif University. International Journal of Psychological Studies, 49(2), 19–42. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijps.v7n4p19CrossRef

Jain, A., & Farley, A. (2012). Mobile phone-based audience response system and student engagement in large-group teaching. Economic Papers: A Journal of Applied Economics and Policy, 31(4), 428–439. https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-3441.12002CrossRef

Jones, M. E., Antonenko, P. D., & Greenwood, C. M. (2012). The impact of collaborative and individualized student response system strategies on learner motivation, metacognition, and knowledge transfer. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28(5), 477–487. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00470.xCrossRef

Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1993). Lisrel 8: Structural equation modelling with the SIMPLIS command language. Scientific Software International, Inc.

Kay, R. H., & LeSage, A. (2009). A strategic assessment of audience response systems used in higher education. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(2), 235–249.CrossRef

Kaya, A., & Balta, N. (2016). Taking advantages of technologies: Using the Socrative in English language teaching classes. International Journal of Social Sciences and Educational Studies, 2(3), 4–12.

Kayri, M. (2009). Araştırmalarada gruplar arası farkın belirlenmesine yönelik çoklu karşılaştırma (POST-HOC) teknikleri. Fırat Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 19(1), 51–64.

Khan, S., & Khan, R. A. (2019). Online assessments: Exploring perspectives of university students. Education and Information Technologies, 24(1), 661–677. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9797-0CrossRef

Kidson, M., & Hornblow, A. (1982). Examination anxiety in medical students: Experiences with the visual analogue scale for anxiety. Medical Education, 16(5), 247–250. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.1982.tb01259.x

Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. The Guilford Press.

Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. The Guilford Press.

Laxman, K. (2011). A study on the adoption of clickers in higher education Research context and rationale of study. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(8), 1291–1303.CrossRef

Lee, K. (2000). English teachers’ barriers to the use of computer-assisted language learning. The Internet TESL Journal, 6.

Lowe, P. A., & Ang, R. P. (2012). Cross-cultural examination of test anxiety among US and Singapore students on the Test anxiety scale for elementary students. Educational Psychology an International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology, 32(1), 107–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2011.625625CrossRef

Lowery, R. C. (2005). Teaching and learning with interactive student response systems: A comparison of commercial products in the higher-education market. Annual Meeting of the Southwestern Social Science Association.

Manley, M. J., & Rosemier, R. A. (1972). Developmental trends in general and test anxiety among junior and senior high school students. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 120, 219–226.CrossRef

Marsh, H. W., & Balla, J. (1994). Goodness of fit in confirmatory factor analysis: The effects of sample size and model parsimony. Quality & Quantity, 28(2), 185–217. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01102761CrossRef

McDonough, K., & Foote, J. A. (2015). The impact of individual and shared clicker use on students’ collaborative learning. Computer and Education, 86, 236–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.08.009CrossRef

Morgan, S. (2012). The effect of using clickers in higher education science classrooms. The University of Alabama.

Morgan, R. K. (2008). Exploring the pedagogical effectiveness of clickers. InSight: A Journal of Scholarly Teaching, 3(1), 31–36.CrossRef

Mork, C.-M.C.-M. (2014). Benefits of using online student response systems in Japanese EFL classrooms. JALT CALL Journal, 10(2), 127–137.CrossRef

Nasser, F., Takahasi, T., Benson, J., Takahashi, T., & Benson, J. (1997). The structure of test anxiety in israeli-arab high school students: An application of confirmatory factor analysis with miniscales. Anxiety, Stress, and Coping: Anxiety, Stress, and Coping an International Journal, 10(2), 129–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/10615809708249298CrossRef

Ohashi, L. (2015). Enhancing EFL writing Courses with the online student response system socrative. Kokusaikeiei Bunkakenkyu, 19(1), 135–145.

Oigara, J., & Keengwe, J. (2013). Students’ perceptions of clickers as an instructional tool to promote active learning. Education and Information Technologies, 18(1), 15–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-011-9173-9CrossRef

Paker, T. (2012). Türkiye’de neden yabancı dil (İngilizce) öğretemiyoruz ve neden öğrencilerimiz iletişim kurabilecek düzeyde İngilizce öğrenemiyor? Pamukkale University Journal of Education, 32(2).

Peixoto, F., Mata, L., Monteiro, V., Sanches, C., & Pekrun, R. (2015). The achievement emotions questionnaire: Validation for pre-adolescent students. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 12(4), 472–481. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2015.1040757CrossRef

Pekrun, R., Frenzel, A. c., Goetz, T., Perry, R. P., Pekrun, R., & Schutz, P. A. (2007). The control-calue theory of achievement emotions. An integrative approach to emotions in education. In Emotion in Education (pp. 13–36). Elsevier Inc. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012372545-5/50003-4

Pekrun, R. (1992). The impact of emotions on learning and achievement: Towards a theory of cognitive motivational mediators. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 41(4), 359–376. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.1992.tb00712.xCrossRef

Pekrun, R. (2000). A social-cognitive, control-value theory of achievement emotions. In J. Heckhausen (Ed.), Motivational psychology of human development: Developing motivation and motivating development (pp. 143–163). Elsevier Science.

Pekrun, R. (2005). Progress and open problems in educational emotion research. Learning and Instruction, 15(5), 497–506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2005.07.014CrossRef

Pekrun, R. (2006). The control-calue theory of achievement emotions: Assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice. Educational Psychology Review, 18(4), 315–341.CrossRef

Pekrun, R., Elliot, A. J., & Maier, M. A. (2006). Achievement goals and discrete achievement emotions: A theoretical model and prospective test. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(3), 583–597.CrossRef

Pekrun, R., & Frese, M. (1992). Emotions in work and achievement. Internationalreview of Industrial and Organizational Pyschology, 7, 153–200.

Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Frenzel, A. C., Barchfeld, P., & Perry, R. P. (2011). Measuring emotions in students’ learning and performance: The achievement emotions questionnaire. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(1), 36–48.CrossRef

Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Perry, R. P., Kramer, K., Hochstadt, M., Molfenter, S., Hoschstadt, M., & Molfenter, S. (2004). Beyond test anxiety: Development and validation of the test emotions questionnaire (TEQ). Anxiety, Stress and Coping: An International Journal, 17(3), 287–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/10615800412331303847CrossRef

Pekrun, R., & Stephens, E. J. (2010). Achievement emotions: A control-value approach. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4(4), 238–255. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00259.xCrossRef

Penuel, W. R., Boscardin, C. K., Masyn, K., & Crawford, V. M. (2007). Teaching with student response systems in elementary and secondary education settings: A survey study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(4), 315–346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-006-9023-4CrossRef

Peters, S. U. (2015). Exploring the effectiveness of collaborative assessment preparation with immediate feedback in an intensive adult English as a second language classroom. (Publication No. 3705904) [Doctoral dissertation, Florida State University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.

Pishghadam, R., Zabetipour, M., & Aminzadeh, A. (2016). Examining emotions in English language learning classes: A case of EFL emotions. Issues in Educational Research, 26(3), 508–527.

Presby, L., & Zakheim, C. (2006). Enhancing student learning with only a click. The Business Review, Cambridge, 6(1), 153–156.

Putwain, D. W., Sander, P., & Larkin, D. (2013). Using the 2×2 framework of achievement goals to predict achievement emotions and academic performance. Learning and Indıvıdual Differences, 25, 80–84.CrossRef

Rodriguez, L. A., & Shepard, M. F. (2013). Adult English language learners’ perceptions of audience response systems (Clickers) as communication aides: A Q-Methodology Study. TESOL Journal, 4(1), 182–193.CrossRef

Sarıçoban, A., & Öz, H. (2014). Türkiye‘de yabancı dil eğitiminde eğilim ne olmalı?, Hacettepe üniversitesi eğitim fakültesi İngiliz dili eğitimi anabilim dalı 1. yabancı dil eğitimi çalıştayı bildirileri.

Schutz, P. A., Pekrun, R., & Phye, G. D. (2007). Emotion in education (Vol. 10). Academic Press.

Şimşek, Ö. (2007). Yapısal eşitlik modellemesine giriş; Temel ilkeler ve LİSREL uygulamaları. Ekinoks Yayıncılık.

Solak, E., & Bayar, A. (2015). Current challenges in english language learning in Turkish EFL context. Participatory Educational Research, 2(1), 106–115.CrossRef

Stowell, J. R., Nelson, J. M., Stowel, J. R., Nelson, J. M., Stowell, J. R., & Nelson, J. M. (2007). Benefits of electronic audience response systems on student participation, learning, and emotion. Teaching of Psychology, 34(4), 253–258.CrossRef

Svetanant, C., & Nakazawa, K. (2014). Enhancing the interactive learning environment in a japanese language lecture through the student response network. The International Journal of Technologies in Learning, 22(1), 11–27.

Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (Fifth Edit). Pearson. https://doi.org/10.1515/snde-2014-0102

TEPAV. (2014). Türkiyede’ki devlet okullarında İngilizce dilinin öğretimine ilişkin ihtiyaç analizi. British Council.

Titman, A. C., & Lancaster, G. A. (2011). Personal response systems for teaching postgraduate statistics to small groups. Journal of Statistics Education, 19(2).

Titova, S., & Talmo, T. (2014). Mobile voting systems for creating collaboration environments and getting immediate feedback: A new curriculum model of a university lecture. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning, 6(3), 18–34. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijmbl.2014070102CrossRef

Tomasello, M., & Herron, C. (1989). Feedback for language transfer errors, the garden path technique. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11(4), 385–395. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100008408CrossRef

Trees, A. R., & Jackson, M. H. (2007). The learning environment in clicker classrooms: Student processes of learning and involvement in large university-level courses using student response systems. Learning, Media and Technology, 32(1), 21–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439880601141179CrossRef

Walker, R., & Barwell, G. (2009). Click or clique? Using educational technology to address students’ anxieties about peer evaluation. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2009.030113

Walker, R. J., Spangler, B. R., Lloyd, E. P., Walker, B. L., Wessels, P. M., & Summerville, A. (2018). Comparing active learning techniques: The effect of clickers and discussion groups on student perceptions and performance. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 34(3), 74–87.CrossRef

Wang, J., & Wang, X. (2012). Structural Equation Modeling: Applications using Mplus: Methods and applications. Wiley.

Wankel, C., & Blessinger, P. (2013). Increasing student engagement and retention using classroom technologıes: Classroom response systems and mediated discourse technologies. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

Weiner, B. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92(4), 548–573.CrossRef

Yıldırım, S., & Kahraman, S. (2012). Sınıf içi etkileşim uygulaması: Dinleyici Yanıt Sisteminin kullanımı ve değerlendirilmesi. Gazi Üniversiessi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 32(3), 571–582.

Yılmaz, V., & Çelik, H. (2009). LISREL ile yapısal eşitlik modellemesi-I. Pegem Akademi.

Young, D. J. (1986). The relationship between anxiety and foreign language oral proficiency ratings. Foreign Language Annals, 19(5), 439–445. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.1986.tb01032.xCrossRef

Yu, Z., Chen, W., Kong, Y., Sun, X. L., Zheng, J., Wentao, C., Kong, Y., Sun, X. L., Zheng, J., Yu, Z., Chen, W., Kong, Y., Sun, X. L., & Zheng, J. (2014). The impact of clickers instruction on cognitive loads and listening and speaking skills in college English class. PLoS ONE, 9(9).

Yükselir, C. (2016). English foreign language (EFL) instructors’ and teachers’ perceptions towards the integration of internet assisted language teaching (IALT) into EFL instruction. Journal of Efficiancy and Responsibility in Education and Science, 9(1), 23–30. https://doi.org/10.7160/eriesj.2016.090104CrossRef

Zhao, Y. (2003). Recent developments in technology and language learning: A Literature review and meta-analysis. CALICO Journal, 21(1), 7–27.CrossRef

Titel: The Effect of Using Student Response System on Achievement and Achievement Emotions in An English Course
verfasst von: Yafes Can
Salih Bardakci
Esma Emmioğlu Sarikaya
Publikationsdatum: 18.11.2021
Verlag: Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in: Technology, Knowledge and Learning / Ausgabe 1/2023
Print ISSN: 2211-1662
Elektronische ISSN: 2211-1670
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-021-09578-3

Premium Partner

Marktübersichten

Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen.

Zur Marktübersicht

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2023

Knowledge Annotation for Intelligent Textbooks

Analysis of Trends in the Application of Augmented Reality in Students with ASD: InTellectual, Social and Conceptual Structure of Scientific Production Through WOS and Scopus

Spelling Errors in Korean Students’ Constructed Responses and the Efficacy of Automatic Spelling Correction on Automated Computer Scoring

Correction: Same, but Different? Digital Transformation in Swiss Vocational Schools from the Perspectives of School Management and Teachers

Integrating Technology in Qatar’s Higher Education Settings: What Helps Faculty Accomplish the Job

Results and prospects from the utilization of Educational Robotics in Greek Schools

Premium Partner

Marktübersichten