nach oben

Technology, Knowledge and Learning

Erschienen in:

23.10.2022 | Original research

To Click, or Not to Click? Perfectionism and the Association of Gender and Competitiveness on Game-Point Monitoring

verfasst von: Šárka Portešová, Michal Jabůrek, Karel Rečka, Ondřej Straka, Wayne D. Parker

Erschienen in: Technology, Knowledge and Learning | Ausgabe 4/2023

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

New game technologies seem to permeate every area of daily life. Therefore, it is not surprising that, in addition to the incorporation of entertaining gaming features into otherwise dull or tedious activities, the positive influence of user experience and user engagement has also been on the rise in recent years. It is all part of gamification. Individual differences in response to gamification deserve attention. Specifically, the objective of this experimental study was to investigate how perfectionism and gender affect behavior under two conditions—free play and competition—during a logic video game played by 155 gifted high school students. Game points monitoring frequency (GPMF) and game completion time (GCT) were measured. Functional perfectionists showed significantly higher GPMF than dysfunctional perfectionists. Furthermore, the competitive condition increased GPMF significantly more in functional perfectionists (compared to dysfunctional perfectionists) and girls tended to show higher GCT across the conditions. The results indicate that, in a competitive environment, the effectiveness of employing points for feedback is influenced by both a perfectionistic personality style and gender. Our study supports the notion that gamification elements can affect individuals differently, supporting the motivation of some students, yet being ignored by others.

Vorheriger Artikel If We Build It, Will They Learn? An Analysis of Students’ Understanding in an Interactive Game During and After a Research Project

Nächster Artikel Usability Evaluation of Imikode Virtual Reality Game to Facilitate Learning of Object-Oriented Programming

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

The data and the R code used for the analyses that support the findings of this study are openly available online (see Supplemental Material).

Initially, the sample comprised of 155 sixth-grade students. However, the data for the Triton video game (the main method described below) from one of the schools (n = 22, 14%) were discarded due to technical difficulties (i.e., problems with the internet connection).

In items 9, 13, and 32, only the word “school” instead of “work/school” was retained (the wording of all the items can be found in Frost et al., 1990). In seven other items, one word was replaced with its more common Czech synonym to increase readability with minimal changes to the items’ meaning.

Abramovich, S., Schunn, C., & Higashi, R. (2013). Are badges useful in education? It depends upon the type of badge and expertise of learner. Educational Technology Research and Development, 61, 217–232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-013-9289-2CrossRef

Adler, A. (1979). Superiority and social interest. Norton.

Algina, J., Keselman, H. J., & Penfield, R. D. (2005). An alternative to Cohen’s standardized mean difference effect size: A robust parameter and confidence interval in the two independent groups case. Psychological Methods, 10, 317–328. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.10.3.317CrossRef

Attali, Y., & Arieli-Attali, M. (2015). Gamification in assessment: Do points affect test performance? Computers & Education, 83, 57–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.12.012CrossRef

Baker, J. A. (1996). Everyday stressors of academically gifted adolescents. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 7(2), 356–368. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X9600700203CrossRef

Barke, A., Bode, S., Dechent, P., Schmidt-Samoa, C., Van Heer, C., & Stahl, J. (2017). To err is (perfectly) human: Behavioural and neural correlates of error processing and perfectionism. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 12(10), 1647–1657. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsx082CrossRef

Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67, 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01

Berkling, K., & Thomas, C. (2013). Gamification of a Software Engineering course and a detailed analysis of the factors that lead to it's failure. Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning (ICL), pp. 525–530. Kazan, Russia. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICL.2013.6644642

Bong, M., Hwang, A., Noh, A., & Kim, S. I. (2014). Perfectionism and motivation of adolescents in academic contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106, 711–729. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035836CrossRef

Brom, C., Stárková, T., Bromová, E., & Děchtěrenko, F. (2017). Gamifying a simulation: Null effects of a game goal, choice, points and praise. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/uwrjb

Buckley, P., & Doyle, E. (2016). Gamification and student motivation. Interactive Learning Environments, 24, 1162–1175. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2014.964263CrossRef

Cagiltay, N. E., Ozcelik, E., & Ozcelik, N. S. (2015). The effect of competition on learning in games. Computers & Education, 87, 35–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.04.001CrossRef

Cheng, Z., Richardson, J. C., & Newby, T. J. (2019). Using digital badges as goal-setting facilitators: A multiple case study. Journal of Computing in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-019-09240-zCrossRef

Codish, D., & Ravid, G. (2014). Personality based gamification: How different personalities perceive gamification. Proceedings of the 22nd European Conference on Information Systems, Tel Aviv, Israel.

Codish, D., & Ravid, G. (2017). Gender moderation in gamification: Does one size fit all? Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii international conference on system sciences (HICSS), pp. 2006–2015, Hawaii.

Conroy, D. E., Metzler, J. N., & Hofer, S. M. (2003). Factorial invariance and latent mean stability of performance failure appraisals. Structural Equation Modeling, 10, 401–422. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM1003_4CrossRef

Cuesta-Albertos, J. A., Gordaliza, A., & Matran, C. (1997). Trimmed k-means: An attempt to robustify quantizers. The Annals of Statistics, 25, 553–576. https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1031833664CrossRef

Denden, M., Tlili, A. Essalmi, F., & Jemni, M. (2018). Does personality affect students' perceived preferences for game elements in gamified learning environments? 18th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), pp. 111–115, Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT.2018.00033

Denden, M., Tlili, A., Essalmi, F., Jemni, M., Chen, N. S., & Burgos, D. (2021). Effects of gender and personality differences on students’ perception of game design elements in educational gamification. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 154, 102674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2021.102674CrossRef

Deterding, S., Sicart, M., Nacke, L., O’Hara, K., & Dixon, D. (2011). Gamification: Using game-design elements in non-gaming contexts. CHI ’11 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2425–28. https://doi.org/10.1145/1979742.1979575

Dichev, C., & Dicheva, D. (2017). Gamifying education: What is known, what is believed and what remains uncertain: A critical review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0042-5CrossRef

Dicheva, D., Dichev, C., Agre, G., & Angelova, G. (2015). Gamification in education: A systematic mapping study. Educational Technology & Society, 18(3), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1515/cait-2014-0007CrossRef

Ding, L. (2019). Applying gamifications to asynchronous online discussions: A mixed methods study. Computers in Human Behavior, 91, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.09.022CrossRef

Dixon, F. A., Lapsley, D. K., & Hanchon, T. A. (2004). An empirical typology of perfectionism in gifted adolescents. Gifted Child Quarterly, 48(2), 95–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620404800203CrossRef

Domínguez, A., Saenz-de-Navarrete, J., de-Marcos, L., Fernández-Sanz, L., Pagés, C., & Martínez-Herráiz, J. J. (2013). Gamifying learning experiences: Practical implications and outcomes. Computers & Education, 63, 380–392.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.020

Dunnett, C. W. (1980). Pairwise multiple comparisons in the unequal variance case. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 75, 796–800. https://doi.org/10.2307/2287161CrossRef

Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41, 1040–1048. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.41.10.1040CrossRef

Erdfelder, E., Faul, F., & Buchner, A. (1996). GPOWER: A general power analysis program. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 28, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03203630CrossRef

Fajmonová, V., Hönigová, S., Urbánek, T., & Širůček, J. (2015). CFT 20-R - Cattellův test fluidní inteligence [CFT 20-R - Cattell's Fluid Intelligence Test] [Measurement instrument]. Hogrefe-Testcentrum.

Fletcher, K. L., & Speirs Neumeister, K. L. (2012). Research on perfectionism and achievement motivation: Implications for gifted students. Psychology in the Schools, 49, 668–677. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21623CrossRef

Frost, R. O., Heimberg, R. G., Holt, C. S., Mattia, J. I., & Neubauer, A. L. (1993). A comparison of two measures of perfectionism. Personality and Individual Differences, 14, 119–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(93)90181-2CrossRef

Frost, R. O., Marten, P., Lahart, C., & Rosenblate, R. (1990). The dimensions of perfectionism. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 14, 449–468. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01172967CrossRef

Frost, R. O., Turcotte, T. A., Heimberg, R. G., Mattia, J. I., Holt, C. S., & Hope, D. A. (1995). Reactions to mistakes among subjects high and low in perfectionistic concern over mistakes. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 19, 195–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02229694CrossRef

Goldberg, L. (1990). An alternative „description of personality”: The big-five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1216–1229. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.59.6.1216CrossRef

Haimovitz, K., & Dweck, C. S. (2016). What predicts children’s fixed and growth intelligence mind-sets? Not their parents’ views of intelligence but their parents’ views of failure. Psychological Science, 27, 859–869. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797616639727CrossRef

Hakulinen, L., & Auvinen, T. (2014). The effect of gamification on students with different achievement goal orientations. Proceedings – 2014 International Conference on Teaching and Learning in Computing and Engineering (LATICE 2014), pp. 9–16, Kuching, Malaysia. https://doi.org/10.1109/LaTiCE.2014.10

Hamari, J., Koivisto, J., & Sarsa, H. (2014). Does gamification work? A literature review of empirical studies on gamification. Proceedings of 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 3025–34, Waikoloa, HI, USA. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2014.649

Hamari, J., & Koivisto, J. (2015). “Working out for likes”: An empirical study on social influence in exercise gamification. Computers in Human Behavior, 50, 333–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.04.018CrossRef

Handley, A. K., Egan, S. J., Kane, R. T., & Rees, C. S. (2014). The relationships between perfectionism, pathological worry and generalised anxiety disorder. BMC Psychiatry, 14, 98. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-14-98CrossRef

Hartmann, T., & Klimmt, C. (2006). Gender and computer games: Exploring females’ dislikes. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(4), 910–931. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00301.xCrossRef

Hawkins, C. C., Watt, H. M. G., & Sinclair, K. E. (2006). Psychometric properties of the frost multidimensional perfectionism scale with Australian adolescent girls: Clarification of multidimensionality and perfectionist typology. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66, 1001–1022. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164405285909CrossRef

Hennig, C. (2020). Trimcluster: Cluster analysis with trimming. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=trimcluster

Hewitt, P. L., & Flett, G. L. (1991a). Dimensions of perfectionism in unipolar depression. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 100, 98. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.100.1.98CrossRef

Hewitt, P. L., & Flett, G. L. (1991b). Perfectionism in the self and social contexts: Conceptualization, assessment, and association with psychopathology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(3), 456. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.60.3.456CrossRef

Hřebíčková, M., Jelínek, M., Květon, P., Benkovič, A., Botek, M., & Sudzina, F. (2020). Big Five Inventory 2 (BFI-2): Hierarchický model s 15 subškálami [Big Five Inventory 2 (BFI-2): Hierarchical model with 15 subscales]. Československá Psychologie.

Inhelder, B., & Piaget, J. (1958). The growth of logical thinking from childhood to adolescence. Basic Books. https://doi.org/10.1037/10034-000CrossRef

Jia, Y., Xu, B., Karanam, Y., & Voida, S. (2016). Personality-targeted gamification: A survey study on personality traits and motivational affordances. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI ’16, pp. 2001–13, San Jose, California, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858515.

Jowett, G. E., Hill, A. P., Hall, H. K., & Curran, T. (2016). Perfectionism, burnout and engagement in youth sport: The mediating role of basic psychological needs. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 24, 18–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2016.01.001CrossRef

Jung, J. H., Schneider, C., & Valacich, J. (2010). Enhancing the motivational affordance of information systems: The effects of real-time performance feedback and goal setting in group collaboration environments. Management Science, 56, 724–742. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1090.1129CrossRef

Kaye, M. P., Conroy, D. E., & Fifer, A. M. (2008). Individual differences in incompetence avoidance. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 30, 110–132. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.30.1.110CrossRef

Klock, A. C. T., Gasparini, I., Pimenta, M. S., & Hamari, J. (2020). Tailored gamification: A review of literature. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 144, 102495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2020.102495CrossRef

Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. (2017). lmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82(13), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13CrossRef

Lenth, R. (2020). Emmeans: Estimated marginal means, aka least-squares means. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emmeans

Lighthall, N. R., Mather, M., & Gorlick, M. A. (2009). Acute stress increases sex differences in risk seeking in the balloon analogue risk task. PLoS One, 4(7). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0006002

Lighthall, N. R., Sakaki, M., Vasunilashorn, S., Nga, L., Somayajula, S., Chen, E. Y., Samii, N., & Mather, M. (2012). Gender differences in reward-related decision processing under stress. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 7, 476–484. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsr026CrossRef

Lucas, K., & Sherry, J. L. (2004). Sex differences in video game play: A communication-based explanation. Communication Research, 31(5), 499–523. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650204267930CrossRef

Lynd-Stevenson, R. M., & Hearne, C. M. (1999). Perfectionism and depressive affect: The pros and cons of being a perfectionist. Personality and Individual Differences, 26(3), 549–562. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(98)00170-6CrossRef

Malone, T. W., & Lepper, M. R. (1987). Making learning fun: A taxonomy of intrinsic motivations for learning. In R.E. Snow & M.J Farr (Eds.), Aptitude, learning, and instruction volume 3: Conative and affective process analyses (pp. 223–253). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1997). Personality trait structure as a human universal. American Psychologist, 52, 509–516. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.52.5.509CrossRef

McGonigal, J. (2011). Reality is broken: Why games make us better and how they can change the world. Penguin Press.

Mekler, E. (2015). The Motivational Potential of Digital Games and Gamification - the Relation Between Game Elements, Experience and Behavior Change. University of Basel.

Mofield, E. L., & Parker Peters, M. (2015). Multidimensional perfectionism within gifted suburban adolescents: An exploration of typology and comparison of samples. Roeper Review, 37, 97–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2015.1008663CrossRef

Montola, M., Nummenmaa, T., Lucero, A., Boberg, M., & Korhonen, H. (2009). Applying game achievement systems to enhance user experience in a photo sharing service. Proceedings of the 13th International MindTrek Conference: Everyday Life in the Ubiquitous Era, pp. 94–97, Tampere, Finland.

Nacke, L. E., & Deterding, S. (2017). The maturing of gamification research. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 450–454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.062CrossRef

Nicholls, J. G., Patashnick, M., & Nolen, S. B. (1985). Adolescents’ theories of education. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 683–692. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.77.6.683CrossRef

Ozcelik, E., Cagiltay, N. E., & Ozcelik, N. S. (2013). The effect of uncertainty on learning in game-like environments. Computers & Education, 67, 12–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.02.009CrossRef

Park, C., Kim, D. G., Cho, S., & Han, H. J. (2019). Adoption of multimedia technology for learning and gender difference. Computers in Human Behavior, 92, 288–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.11.029CrossRef

Parker, W. D. (1997). An empirical typology of perfectionism in academically talented children. American Educational Research Journal, 34, 545–562. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312034003545CrossRef

Parker, W. D. (2002). Perfectionism and adjustment in gifted children. In G. L. Flett & P. L. Hewitt (Eds.), Perfectionism: Theory, research, and treatment (pp. 133–148). American Psychological Association.CrossRef

Parker, W. D., & Mills, C. J. (1996). The incidence of perfectionism in gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 40, 194–199. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698629604000404CrossRef

Parker, W. D., Portešová, S., & Stumpf, H. (2001). Perfectionism in mathematically gifted and typical Czech students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 25, 138–152. https://doi.org/10.1177/016235320102500203CrossRef

Pedro, L. Z., Lopes, A. M. Z., Prates, B. G., Vassileva, J., & Isotani, S. (2015). Does gamification work for boys and girls? An exploratory study with a virtual learning environment. Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, pp. 214–19, NY, US. https://doi.org/10.1145/2695664.2695752

Pfeiffer, S. I., & Stocking, V. B. (2000). Vulnerabilities of academically gifted students. Special Services in the Schools, 16, 83–93. https://doi.org/10.1300/J008v16n01_06CrossRef

Plass, J. L., O’Keefe, P. A., Homer, B. D., Case, J., Hayward, E. O., Stein, M., & Perlin, K. (2013). The impact of individual, competitive, and collaborative mathematics game play on learning, performance, and motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(4), 1050. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032688CrossRef

Portešová, Š, & Urbánek, T. (2013). Typology of perfectionism in a group of mathematically gifted Czech adolescents over one decade. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 33, 1116–1144. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431613487603CrossRef

Przybylski, A. K., Rigby, C. S., & Ryan, R. M. (2010). A motivational model of videogame engagement. Review of General Psychology, 14, 154–166. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019440CrossRef

R Core Team. (2017). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/

Revelle, W. (2017). psych: Procedures for Psychological, Psychometric, and Personality Research. Northwestern University. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/psych/index.html

Rice, K. G., & Ray, M. E. (2018). Perfectionism and the gifted. In S. I. Pfeiffer, E. Shaunessy-Dedrick, & M. Foley-Nicpon (Eds.), APA Handbook of Giftedness and Talent (pp. 645–58). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000038-042

Santos, A. C. G., Oliveira, W., Hamari, J., Rodrigues, L., Toda, A. M., Palomino, P. T., & Isotani, S. (2021). The relationship between user types and gamification designs. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11257-021-09300-zCrossRef

Schneider, W. J., & McGrew, K. S. (2018). The cattell-horn-carroll theory of cognitive abilities. In D. P. Flanagan & E. M. McDonough (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (4th ed., pp. 73–163). The Guilford Press.

Schuler, P. A. (2000). Perfectionism and gifted adolescents. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 11(4), 183–196. https://doi.org/10.4219/jsge-2000-629CrossRef

Shen, W. C. M., Liu, D., Santhanam, R., & Evans, D. A. (2016). Gamified technology-mediated learning: The role of individual differences. Proceedings of the Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (PACIS). https://aisel.aisnet.org/pacis2016/47

Silverman, L. K. (2007). Perfectionism: The crucible of giftedness. Gifted Education International, 23(3), 233–245. https://doi.org/10.1177/026142940702300304CrossRef

Slaney, R. B., & Ashby, J. S. (1996). Perfectionists: Study of a criterion group. Journal of Counseling & Development, 74(4), 393–398. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6676.1996.tb01885.xCrossRef

Smiderle, R., Rigo, S. J., Marques, L. B., de Miranda Coelho, J. A. P., & Jaques, P. A. (2020). The impact of gamification on students’ learning, engagement and behavior based on their personality traits. Smart Learning Environments, 7, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-019-0098-xCrossRef

Soto, C. J., & John, O. P. (2009). Ten facet scales for the big five inventory: Convergence with NEO PI-R facets, self-peer agreement, and discriminant validity. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 84–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2008.10.002CrossRef

Soto, C. J., & John, O. P. (2017a). Short and extra-short forms of the big five inventory–2: The BFI-2-S and BFI-2-XS. Journal of Research in Personality, 68, 69–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2017.02.004CrossRef

Soto, C. J., & John, O. P. (2017b). The next big five inventory (BFI-2): Developing and assessing a hierarchical model with 15 facets to enhance bandwidth, fidelity, and predictive power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113, 117–143. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000096CrossRef

Speirs Neumeister, K. L. (2004). Factors influencing the development of perfectionism in gifted college students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 48, 259–274. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620404800402CrossRef

Stoeber, J., & Childs, J. H. (2011). Perfectionism. In R. J. R. Levesque (Ed.). Encyclopedia of Adolescence (Vol. 4), pp. 2053–59. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1695-2_279

Stoeber, J. (2012). Perfectionism and performance. In S. M. Murphy (Ed.), Oxford Handbook of Sport and Performance Psychology (pp. 294–306). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199731763.013.0015

Stoeber, J. (2011). The dual nature of perfectionism in sports: Relationships with emotion, motivation, and performance. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 4, 128–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984X.2011.604789CrossRef

Stoeber, J. (2018). The psychology of perfectionism: An introduction. In J. Stoeber (Ed.), The psychology of perfectionism: Theory, research, applications (pp. 3–16). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.

Stoeber, J., & Eismann, U. (2007). Perfectionism in young musicians: Relations with motivation, effort, achievement, and distress. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 2182–2192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2007.06.036CrossRef

Stoeber, J., & Otto, K. (2006). Positive conceptions of perfectionism: Approaches, evidence, challenges. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 295–319. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr1004_2CrossRef

Stricker, J., Buecker, S., Schneider, M., & Preckel, F. (2020). Intellectual giftedness and multidimensional perfectionism: A meta-analytic review. Educational Psychology Review, 32(2), 391–414. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09504-1CrossRef

Swift, V., & Peterson, J. B. (2018). Improving the effectiveness of performance feedback by considering personality traits and task demands. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197810CrossRef

Tabri, N., Werner, K. M., Milyavskaya, M., & Wohl, M. J. A. (2018). Perfectionism predicts disordered gambling via financially focused self-concept. Journal of Gambling Issues, 2018(38), 252–267. https://doi.org/10.4309/jgi.2018.38.13CrossRef

Tops, M., Koole, S. L., & Wijers, A. A. (2013). The Pe of perfectionism: Concern over mistakes predicts the amplitude of a late frontal error positivity. Journal of Psychophysiology, 27(2), 84–94. https://doi.org/10.1027/0269-8803/a000090CrossRef

Van den Bos, R., Harteveld, M., & Stoop, H. (2009). Stress and decision-making in humans: Performance is related to cortisol reactivity, albeit differently in men and women. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 34(10), 1449–1458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2009.04.016CrossRef

Vorderer, P., Hartmann, T., & Klimmt, C. (2003). Explaining the enjoyment of playing video games: The role of competition. Second International Conference on Entertainment Computing, Pittsburgh, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/958720.958735CrossRef

Wang, X., Schneider, C., & Valacich, J. S. (2012). Fine-tuning group collaboration environments: How differences in general causality orientation and performance targets shape interaction and performance. Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 553–61, Maui, HI, USA. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2012.281

Wechsler, D. (2008). Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (4th ed.) [Measurement instrument]. Pearson. https://doi.org/10.1037/t15169-000

Wechsler, D. (2014). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (5th ed.) [Measurement instrument]. Pearson.

Weiß, R. H. (2006). Grundintelligenztest Skala 2 – revision (CFT 20-R) [Culture Fair Intelligence Test 20–revision] [Measurement instrument]. Hogrefe.

Werbach, K., & Hunter, D. (2011). Serious gamification [WWW Document]. In Win Serious Gamification Symp. http://gamifyforthewin.com (accessed 28.09.2021).

Werbach, K., & Hunter, D. (2012). For the win: How game thinking can revolutionize your business. Wharton Digital Press.

Wickham, H., Averick, M., Bryan, J., Chang, W., McGowan, L., François, R., Grolemund, G., Hayes, A., Henry, L., Hester, J., Kuhn, M., Pedersen, L. T., Miller, E., Bache, S. M., Müller, K., Ooms, J., Robinson, D., Seide, D. P., Spinu, V., & Yutani, H. (2019). Welcome to the tidyverse. Journal of Open Source Software, 4, 1686. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01686CrossRef

Wilcox, R. R. (2017). Modern statistics for the social and behavioral sciences: A practical introduction. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315154480CrossRef

Williams, D., Consalvo, M., Caplan, S., & Yee, N. (2009). Looking for gender: Gender roles and behaviors among online gamers. Journal of Communication, 59(4), 700–725. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01453.xCrossRef

Wise, S. L., & DeMars, C. E. (2005). Low examinee effort in low-stakes assessment: Problems and potential solutions. Educational Assessment, 10(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326977ea1001_1CrossRef

Yu, Z., Gao, M., & Wang, L. (2021). The effect of educational games on learning outcomes, student motivation, engagement and satisfaction. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 59(3), 522–546. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633120969214CrossRef

Titel: To Click, or Not to Click? Perfectionism and the Association of Gender and Competitiveness on Game-Point Monitoring
verfasst von: Šárka Portešová
Michal Jabůrek
Karel Rečka
Ondřej Straka
Wayne D. Parker
Publikationsdatum: 23.10.2022
Verlag: Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in: Technology, Knowledge and Learning / Ausgabe 4/2023
Print ISSN: 2211-1662
Elektronische ISSN: 2211-1670
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-022-09625-7

Premium Partner

Marktübersichten

Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen.

Zur Marktübersicht

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2023

Drivers of Users’ Embracement of 3D Digital Educational Spaces in Higher Education: A Qualitative Approach

The Idea That Digital Remote Learning Can Happen Anytime, Anywhere in Forced Online Teacher Education is a Myth

The Digital Transformation of Instructional Materials. Views and Practices of Teachers, Families and Editors

Interactive Artifacts and Stories: Design Considerations for an Object-Based Learning History Game

Supporting in-Service Special Educational Needs Teachers to Stay Engaged: A Two-Step Hierarchical Linear Regression Analysis

A Comparison of Plugged and Unplugged Tools in Teaching Algorithms at the K-12 Level for Computational Thinking Skills

Premium Partner

Marktübersichten