Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Business Ethics 1/2013

01.08.2013

Women in the Boardroom: How Do Female Directors of Corporate Boards Perceive Boardroom Dynamics?

Erschienen in: Journal of Business Ethics | Ausgabe 1/2013

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This study investigated how female directors of corporate boards of directors (BoD) experience boardroom dynamics. The study represents an initial research trend that moves from a unilateral focus on financial outcomes of female representation in BoDs toward stronger attention on the social dynamics in the boardroom. Drawing on social identity theory, the study proposed that female directors often constitute an out-group within the BoD, preventing them from experiencing positive board dynamics. More specifically, the study explored the extent to which female directors do experience less justice, lower cohesion, and higher levels of conflicts within the BoD than their male counterparts do. Moreover, we assumed that female directors with nontraditional educational backgrounds would be particularly likely to experience negative boardroom dynamics whereas female chairpersons of BoDs would perceive boardroom dynamics more positively than other female directors. The sample consisted of 491 directors from 149 BoDs. Our findings revealed that there were generally few differences in the way female and male directors experienced boardroom dynamics and female chairpersons of BoDs did not perceive the dynamics differently than other female directors. Female directors with nontraditional educational backgrounds perceived the boardroom dynamics somewhat more negatively than other female directors, but the differences were not statistically significant. The conclusions from this study are that there are reasons to believe that female directors are welcomed into boardrooms, not perceived as out-groups, and BoDs are able to benefit from the female directors’ experience and skills.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 267–299). New York: Academic Press. Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 267–299). New York: Academic Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Adams, S. M., & Flynn, P. M. (2005). Local knowledge advances women’s access to corporate boards. Corporate Governance, 13, 836–846.CrossRef Adams, S. M., & Flynn, P. M. (2005). Local knowledge advances women’s access to corporate boards. Corporate Governance, 13, 836–846.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Asch, S. E. (1955). Opinions and social pressure. Scientific American, 193, 31–35.CrossRef Asch, S. E. (1955). Opinions and social pressure. Scientific American, 193, 31–35.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bies, R. J., & Moag, J. F. (1986). Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. In R. J. Lewicki, B. H. Sheppard, & M. H. Bazerman (Eds.), Research on negotiations in organizations (Vol. 1, pp. 43–55). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. Bies, R. J., & Moag, J. F. (1986). Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. In R. J. Lewicki, B. H. Sheppard, & M. H. Bazerman (Eds.), Research on negotiations in organizations (Vol. 1, pp. 43–55). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Bilimoria, D. (2000). Building the businesss case for women corporate directors. In R. J. Burke & M. C. Mattis (Eds.), Women on corporate boards of directors: International challenges and opportunities (pp. 25–40). Boston: Kluwer Academic.CrossRef Bilimoria, D. (2000). Building the businesss case for women corporate directors. In R. J. Burke & M. C. Mattis (Eds.), Women on corporate boards of directors: International challenges and opportunities (pp. 25–40). Boston: Kluwer Academic.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Brewer, M. B. (1995). Managing diversity: The role of social identities. In S. E. Jackson & M. Ruderman (Eds.), Diversity in work teams: Research and paradigms for a changing work place (pp. 47–68). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRef Brewer, M. B. (1995). Managing diversity: The role of social identities. In S. E. Jackson & M. Ruderman (Eds.), Diversity in work teams: Research and paradigms for a changing work place (pp. 47–68). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Campbell, K., & Minguez-Vera, A. (2008). Gender diversity in the boardroom and firm financial performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 83, 435–451.CrossRef Campbell, K., & Minguez-Vera, A. (2008). Gender diversity in the boardroom and firm financial performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 83, 435–451.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Carter, D. A., Simkins, B. J., & Simpson, W. G. (2003). Corporate governance, board diversity, and firm value. The Financial Review, 38, 33–53.CrossRef Carter, D. A., Simkins, B. J., & Simpson, W. G. (2003). Corporate governance, board diversity, and firm value. The Financial Review, 38, 33–53.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Colquitt, J. A. (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 386–400.CrossRef Colquitt, J. A. (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 386–400.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Daily, C. M., & Dalton, D. R. (2003a). Are director equity policies exclusionary? Business Ethics Quarterly, 13, 415–432.CrossRef Daily, C. M., & Dalton, D. R. (2003a). Are director equity policies exclusionary? Business Ethics Quarterly, 13, 415–432.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Daily, C. M., & Dalton, D. R. (2003b). Women in the boardroom: A business imperative. Journal of Business Strategy, 24, 8–10.CrossRef Daily, C. M., & Dalton, D. R. (2003b). Women in the boardroom: A business imperative. Journal of Business Strategy, 24, 8–10.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat De Dreu, C. K. W., & De Vries, N. K. (1997). Minority dissent in organizations. In C. K. W. De Dreu & E. Van De Vliert (Eds.), Using conflict in organizations (pp. 72–86). London: Sage.CrossRef De Dreu, C. K. W., & De Vries, N. K. (1997). Minority dissent in organizations. In C. K. W. De Dreu & E. Van De Vliert (Eds.), Using conflict in organizations (pp. 72–86). London: Sage.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Erhardt, N. L., Werbel, J. D., & Schrader, C. B. (2003). Board of director diversity and firm financial performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 11, 102–111.CrossRef Erhardt, N. L., Werbel, J. D., & Schrader, C. B. (2003). Board of director diversity and firm financial performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 11, 102–111.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Eriksen, W., & Einarsen, S. (2004). Gender minority as a risk factor of exposure to bullying at work: The case of male assistant nurses. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 13, 473–492.CrossRef Eriksen, W., & Einarsen, S. (2004). Gender minority as a risk factor of exposure to bullying at work: The case of male assistant nurses. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 13, 473–492.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Eyring, A., & Stead, B. A. (1998). Shattering the glass ceiling: Some successful corporate practices. Journal of Business Ethics, 17, 245–251.CrossRef Eyring, A., & Stead, B. A. (1998). Shattering the glass ceiling: Some successful corporate practices. Journal of Business Ethics, 17, 245–251.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Farrell, K. A., & Hersch, P. L. (2005). Additions to corporate boards: The effect of gender. Journal of Corporate Finance, 11, 85–1006.CrossRef Farrell, K. A., & Hersch, P. L. (2005). Additions to corporate boards: The effect of gender. Journal of Corporate Finance, 11, 85–1006.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fiske, S., & Neuberg, S. (1990). A continuum of impression formation, from category-based to individuating processes: Influences of information and motivation on attention and interpretation. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, 23 (pp. 1–74). New York: Academic Press. Fiske, S., & Neuberg, S. (1990). A continuum of impression formation, from category-based to individuating processes: Influences of information and motivation on attention and interpretation. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, 23 (pp. 1–74). New York: Academic Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Fondas, N., & Sassalos, S. (2000). A different voice in the boardroom: How the presence of women directors affects board influence over management. Global Focus, 12, 13–22. Fondas, N., & Sassalos, S. (2000). A different voice in the boardroom: How the presence of women directors affects board influence over management. Global Focus, 12, 13–22.
Zurück zum Zitat Forbes, D. P., & Milliken, F. J. (1999). Cognition and corporate governance: Understanding boards of directors as strategic decision-making groups. Academy of Management Review, 24, 489–505. Forbes, D. P., & Milliken, F. J. (1999). Cognition and corporate governance: Understanding boards of directors as strategic decision-making groups. Academy of Management Review, 24, 489–505.
Zurück zum Zitat Greenberg, J. (1990). Organizational justice: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Journal of Management, 16, 399–432.CrossRef Greenberg, J. (1990). Organizational justice: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Journal of Management, 16, 399–432.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Greenberg, J. (1993). The social side of fairness: Interpersonal and informational classes of organizational justice. In R. Cropanzano (Ed.), Justice in the workplace: Approaching fairness in human resource management (pp. 79–103). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Greenberg, J. (1993). The social side of fairness: Interpersonal and informational classes of organizational justice. In R. Cropanzano (Ed.), Justice in the workplace: Approaching fairness in human resource management (pp. 79–103). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Zurück zum Zitat Heidrick, & Struggles, (2007). Corporate governance in Europe 2007report: Raising the bar. Paris: Heidrick, & Struggles International Inc. Heidrick, & Struggles, (2007). Corporate governance in Europe 2007report: Raising the bar. Paris: Heidrick, & Struggles International Inc.
Zurück zum Zitat Huse, M., & Solberg, A. G. (2006). Gender related board room dynamics: How Scandinavian women make and can make contributions on corporate boards. Women in Management Review, 21, 113–130.CrossRef Huse, M., & Solberg, A. G. (2006). Gender related board room dynamics: How Scandinavian women make and can make contributions on corporate boards. Women in Management Review, 21, 113–130.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ibarra, H. (1992). Homophily and differential returns: Sex differences in network structure and access in an advertising firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 422–447.CrossRef Ibarra, H. (1992). Homophily and differential returns: Sex differences in network structure and access in an advertising firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 422–447.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Jehn, K. (1995). A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 256–282.CrossRef Jehn, K. (1995). A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 256–282.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Jehn, K. A., Chadwick, C., & Thatcher, S. (1997). To agree or not to agree: Diversity, conflict, and group outcomes. International Journal of Conflict Management, 8, 287–306.CrossRef Jehn, K. A., Chadwick, C., & Thatcher, S. (1997). To agree or not to agree: Diversity, conflict, and group outcomes. International Journal of Conflict Management, 8, 287–306.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Joshi, A., & Jackson, S. E. (2003). Managing workforce diversity to enhance cooperation in organizations. In M. A. West, D. Tjosvold, & K. G. Smith (Eds.), Organizational teamwork and cooperative working (pp. 277–296). Chichester: Wiley. Joshi, A., & Jackson, S. E. (2003). Managing workforce diversity to enhance cooperation in organizations. In M. A. West, D. Tjosvold, & K. G. Smith (Eds.), Organizational teamwork and cooperative working (pp. 277–296). Chichester: Wiley.
Zurück zum Zitat Konrad, A. M., Kramer, V., & Erkut, S. (2008). The impact of three or more women on corporate boards. Organizational Dynamics, 37, 145–164.CrossRef Konrad, A. M., Kramer, V., & Erkut, S. (2008). The impact of three or more women on corporate boards. Organizational Dynamics, 37, 145–164.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Leventhal, G. S. (1980). What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships. In K. S. Gergen, M. S. Greenberg, & R. H. Willis (Eds.), Social exchange: Advances in theory and research (pp. 27–55). New York: Plenum Press.CrossRef Leventhal, G. S. (1980). What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships. In K. S. Gergen, M. S. Greenberg, & R. H. Willis (Eds.), Social exchange: Advances in theory and research (pp. 27–55). New York: Plenum Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Leymann, H. (1993). Mobbing—Psychoterror am Arbeitspladz und wie man sich dagegen wehren kann (Mobbing—psychoterror in the workplace and how one can defend oneself). Reinbeck: Rowohlt. Leymann, H. (1993). Mobbing—Psychoterror am Arbeitspladz und wie man sich dagegen wehren kann (Mobbing—psychoterror in the workplace and how one can defend oneself). Reinbeck: Rowohlt.
Zurück zum Zitat Masters, B. (2008). Norway sets the pace for women with board quotas. Financial Times. June 27. Masters, B. (2008). Norway sets the pace for women with board quotas. Financial Times. June 27.
Zurück zum Zitat Moorman, R. H. (1991). Relationships between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors: Do fairness perceptions influence employee citizenship? Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 845–855.CrossRef Moorman, R. H. (1991). Relationships between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors: Do fairness perceptions influence employee citizenship? Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 845–855.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat O’Reilly, C., Caldwell, D., & Barnett, W. (1989). Work group demography, social integration and turnover. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34, 21–37.CrossRef O’Reilly, C., Caldwell, D., & Barnett, W. (1989). Work group demography, social integration and turnover. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34, 21–37.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper & Row. Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper & Row.
Zurück zum Zitat Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.CrossRef Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rose, C. (2007). Does female representation influence firm performance? The Danish evidence. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15, 404–413.CrossRef Rose, C. (2007). Does female representation influence firm performance? The Danish evidence. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15, 404–413.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rothbart, M., & John, O. (1985). Social categorization and behavioral episodes: A cognitive analysis of effects of intergroup contact. Journal of Social Issues, 41, 81–104.CrossRef Rothbart, M., & John, O. (1985). Social categorization and behavioral episodes: A cognitive analysis of effects of intergroup contact. Journal of Social Issues, 41, 81–104.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sanchez-Mazas, M., Roux, P., & Mugny, G. (1994). When the outgroup becomes the ingroup and when the ingroup becomes the outgroup: Xenophobia and social categorization in a resource allocation task. European Journal of Social Psychology, 24, 417–423.CrossRef Sanchez-Mazas, M., Roux, P., & Mugny, G. (1994). When the outgroup becomes the ingroup and when the ingroup becomes the outgroup: Xenophobia and social categorization in a resource allocation task. European Journal of Social Psychology, 24, 417–423.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Shapiro, D. L., Buttner, E. H., & Barry, B. (1994). Explanations: What factors enhance their perceived adequacy? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 58, 346–368.CrossRef Shapiro, D. L., Buttner, E. H., & Barry, B. (1994). Explanations: What factors enhance their perceived adequacy? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 58, 346–368.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Shrader, C. B., Blackburn, V. B., & Iles, P. (1997). Women in management and firm financial performance: An exploratory study. Journal of Managerial Issues, 9, 355–372. Shrader, C. B., Blackburn, V. B., & Iles, P. (1997). Women in management and firm financial performance: An exploratory study. Journal of Managerial Issues, 9, 355–372.
Zurück zum Zitat Summers, I., Coffelt, T., & Horton, R. (1988). Work group cohesion. Psychological Reports, 63, 627–636.CrossRef Summers, I., Coffelt, T., & Horton, R. (1988). Work group cohesion. Psychological Reports, 63, 627–636.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
Zurück zum Zitat Terjesen, S., Sealy, R., & Singh, V. (2009). Women directors on corporate boards: A review and research agenda. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17, 320–337.CrossRef Terjesen, S., Sealy, R., & Singh, V. (2009). Women directors on corporate boards: A review and research agenda. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17, 320–337.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Torchia, M., Calabro, A., & Huse, M. (2011). Women directors on corporate boards; From tokenism to critical mass. Journal of Business Ethics, 102, 299–317.CrossRef Torchia, M., Calabro, A., & Huse, M. (2011). Women directors on corporate boards; From tokenism to critical mass. Journal of Business Ethics, 102, 299–317.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Tourangeau, R., Rips, L. J., & Rasinski, K. (2000). The psychology of survey response. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Tourangeau, R., Rips, L. J., & Rasinski, K. (2000). The psychology of survey response. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Tsui, A. S., Egan, T. D., & O’Reilly, C. A. (1992). Being different: Relational demography and organizational attachment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 549–579.CrossRef Tsui, A. S., Egan, T. D., & O’Reilly, C. A. (1992). Being different: Relational demography and organizational attachment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 549–579.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Turner, R. (1982). Towards a cognitive redefinition of the social group. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Social identity and intergroup relations (pp. 15–40). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. Turner, R. (1982). Towards a cognitive redefinition of the social group. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Social identity and intergroup relations (pp. 15–40). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Turner, J. C., & Haslam, S. A. (2001). Social identity, organizations and leadership. In M. Turner (Ed.), Groups at work: Theory and research (pp. 25–64). London: Lawrence Erlbaum. Turner, J. C., & Haslam, S. A. (2001). Social identity, organizations and leadership. In M. Turner (Ed.), Groups at work: Theory and research (pp. 25–64). London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Zurück zum Zitat Westphal, J. D., & Milton, L. P. (2000). How experience and network ties affect the influence of demographic minorities on corporate boards. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, 366–398.CrossRef Westphal, J. D., & Milton, L. P. (2000). How experience and network ties affect the influence of demographic minorities on corporate boards. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, 366–398.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Women in the Boardroom: How Do Female Directors of Corporate Boards Perceive Boardroom Dynamics?
Publikationsdatum
01.08.2013
Erschienen in
Journal of Business Ethics / Ausgabe 1/2013
Print ISSN: 0167-4544
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-0697
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1461-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2013

Journal of Business Ethics 1/2013 Zur Ausgabe

Premium Partner