Skip to main content

2016 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

2. Ambiguity, Robustness, and Contract Design

verfasst von : Suren Basov

Erschienen in: Social Norms, Bounded Rationality and Optimal Contracts

Verlag: Springer Singapore

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

In this chapter we consider the choice economic agents make under ambiguity, i.e. in a situation when they do not have well-defined probabilistic beliefs. The agents still have a well-defined objective they maximize, but even this minimal deviation from the standard model allows to explain some, otherwise puzzling, features of real life contracts.  

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Fußnoten
1
Space S is assumed to be a measure space and acts are assumed to be measurable functions from S into C.
 
2
The uniqueness of the probability in Savage’s theory is predicated on the convention that the utility function is state independent. Savage axioms guarantee state independence of preferences, but not of the utility and beliefs separately.
 
3
Technically, one should speak about the non-null events, but this is not important for the current discussion.
 
4
I describe briefly Ellsberg’s experiments in the next section.
 
5
In the decision-makers beliefs respect objective information then probability of drawing out green ball should be 1/3. The latter is, however, immaterial for our argument.
 
6
Note that the endowments are measurable with respect to their partitions.
 
7
Definition of private core is similar to that of core, but with crucial requirement that allocations are measurable with respect to private information partitions.
 
8
This logic assumes that both agents are expected utility maximizers.
 
9
Use of the maximin criterion in classical statistics dates back to Wald (1950), but the behaviorial foundations where first provided by Gilboa and Schmeidler (1982).
 
10
The conditions are rationality, monotonicity, and continuity.
 
11
As we will see later, hidden action and hidden information models often respond in different ways to deviations from Bayesian rationality. For example, the costs of boundedly rational behavior are usually borne by the principal in hidden action models, but can be borne by either the principal, or the agent, or both in hidden information models.
 
12
See papers by Krasa and Yannelis (1994), Koutsougeras and Yannelis (1993), Hahn and Yannelis (1997).
 
13
The latter is the limited liability constraint, which prevents the principal from selling the enterprise to the agent.
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Carroll, G. (2015). Robustness and linear contracts. American Economic Review, 105, 536–563.CrossRef Carroll, G. (2015). Robustness and linear contracts. American Economic Review, 105, 536–563.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat De Castro, L. I., & Yannelis, N. C. (2011). Ambiguity aversion solves the conflict between efficiency and incentive compatibility. University of Manchester Economic Discussion Papers Series, EDP-1106. De Castro, L. I., & Yannelis, N. C. (2011). Ambiguity aversion solves the conflict between efficiency and incentive compatibility. University of Manchester Economic Discussion Papers Series, EDP-1106.
Zurück zum Zitat Ellsberg, D. (1961). Risk, ambiguity, and the savage axioms. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 75, 643–669. Ellsberg, D. (1961). Risk, ambiguity, and the savage axioms. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 75, 643–669.
Zurück zum Zitat Gilboa, I., & Schmeidler, I. D. (1989). Maximin expected utility with non-unique prior. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 18, 141–153.CrossRef Gilboa, I., & Schmeidler, I. D. (1989). Maximin expected utility with non-unique prior. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 18, 141–153.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gul, F., & Postlewaite, A. (1992). Asymptotic efficiency in large exchange economies with asymmetric information. Econometrica, 60, 1273–1292.CrossRef Gul, F., & Postlewaite, A. (1992). Asymptotic efficiency in large exchange economies with asymmetric information. Econometrica, 60, 1273–1292.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hahn, G., & Yannelis, N. C. (1997). Efficiency and incentive compatibility in differential information economies. Economic Theory, 10, 383–411.CrossRef Hahn, G., & Yannelis, N. C. (1997). Efficiency and incentive compatibility in differential information economies. Economic Theory, 10, 383–411.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hart, O., & Moore, J. (1999). Foundations of incomplete contracts. Review of Economic Studies, 66, 115–139.CrossRef Hart, O., & Moore, J. (1999). Foundations of incomplete contracts. Review of Economic Studies, 66, 115–139.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat He, W., & Yannelis, N. C. (2015). Equilibrium theory under ambiguity. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 61, 86–95.CrossRef He, W., & Yannelis, N. C. (2015). Equilibrium theory under ambiguity. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 61, 86–95.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Holmström, B., & Myerson, R. B. (1983). Efficient and durable decision rules with incomplete information. Econometrica, 51, 1799–1819.CrossRef Holmström, B., & Myerson, R. B. (1983). Efficient and durable decision rules with incomplete information. Econometrica, 51, 1799–1819.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Knight, F. H. (1921). Risk, uncertainty, and profits. Boston, MA: Hart, Schaffner & Marx; Houghton Mifflin Co. Knight, F. H. (1921). Risk, uncertainty, and profits. Boston, MA: Hart, Schaffner & Marx; Houghton Mifflin Co.
Zurück zum Zitat Koutsougeras, L., & Yannelis, N. C. (1993). Incentive compatibility and information superiority of the core of an economy with differential information. Economic Theory, 3, 195–216.CrossRef Koutsougeras, L., & Yannelis, N. C. (1993). Incentive compatibility and information superiority of the core of an economy with differential information. Economic Theory, 3, 195–216.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Krasa, S., & Yannelis, N. C. (1994). The value allocation of an economy with differential information. Econometrica, 62, 881–900.CrossRef Krasa, S., & Yannelis, N. C. (1994). The value allocation of an economy with differential information. Econometrica, 62, 881–900.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat McLean, R., & Postlewaite, A. (2002). Informational size and incentive compatibility. Econometrica, 70, 2421–2454.CrossRef McLean, R., & Postlewaite, A. (2002). Informational size and incentive compatibility. Econometrica, 70, 2421–2454.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mukerji, S. (1998). Ambiguity aversion and incompleteness of contractual form. American Economic Review, 88, 1207–1231. Mukerji, S. (1998). Ambiguity aversion and incompleteness of contractual form. American Economic Review, 88, 1207–1231.
Zurück zum Zitat Pulford, B. D. (2009). Is luck on my side: Optimism, pessimism, and ambiguity aversion. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 1079–1087.CrossRef Pulford, B. D. (2009). Is luck on my side: Optimism, pessimism, and ambiguity aversion. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 1079–1087.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Radner, R. (1968). Competitive equilibrium under uncertainty. Econometrica, 36, 31–58.CrossRef Radner, R. (1968). Competitive equilibrium under uncertainty. Econometrica, 36, 31–58.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Radner, R. (1982). Equilibrium under uncertainty. In K. J. Arrow & M. D. Intriligator (Eds.), Handbook of mathematical economics, vol. II. Amsterdam: North Holland. Radner, R. (1982). Equilibrium under uncertainty. In K. J. Arrow & M. D. Intriligator (Eds.), Handbook of mathematical economics, vol. II. Amsterdam: North Holland.
Zurück zum Zitat Savage, L. J. (1954). Foundations of statistics. New York, NY, USA: Wiley. Savage, L. J. (1954). Foundations of statistics. New York, NY, USA: Wiley.
Zurück zum Zitat Segal, I. (1999). Complexity and renegotiation: A foundation for incomplete contracts. Review of Economic Studies, 66, 57–82.CrossRef Segal, I. (1999). Complexity and renegotiation: A foundation for incomplete contracts. Review of Economic Studies, 66, 57–82.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Simon, H. A. (1956). Reply: Surrogates for uncertain decision problems. Office of Naval Research. Simon, H. A. (1956). Reply: Surrogates for uncertain decision problems. Office of Naval Research.
Zurück zum Zitat Wald, A. (1950). Statistical decision functions. New York, NY, USA: John Wiley & Sons. Wald, A. (1950). Statistical decision functions. New York, NY, USA: John Wiley & Sons.
Zurück zum Zitat Yannelis, N. C. (1991). The core of an economy with differential information. Economic Theory, 1, 183–197.CrossRef Yannelis, N. C. (1991). The core of an economy with differential information. Economic Theory, 1, 183–197.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Ambiguity, Robustness, and Contract Design
verfasst von
Suren Basov
Copyright-Jahr
2016
Verlag
Springer Singapore
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1041-5_2

Premium Partner