nach oben

International Journal of Technology and Design Education

Erschienen in:

29.09.2022

Correlates between imagination types and abilities in designing works

verfasst von: Chi-Ruei Tsai, Jon-Chao Hong, Kai-Hsin Tai

Erschienen in: International Journal of Technology and Design Education | Ausgabe 3/2023

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

A variety of studies have attempted to explain the dispositions of imagination; notably, imagination engages and develops an individual’s creativity. In the present study, we propose that three types of imagination dispositions (i.e., epistemic, sensory, and future imagination) serve as cognitive mechanisms for the ability to efficiently generate new ideas relevant to imagination with-making and imagination without-making. The correlates between imagination disposition and imagination with-making and imagination without-making were subjected to confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modeling. The results showed that epistemic imagination was positively related to imagination with-making, but not to imagination without-making; future imagination was positively related to imagination without-making but was not related to imagination with-making; and sensory imagination was positively related to both imagination with-making and imagination without-making. Moreover, imagination without-making was positively related to imagination with-making. The results of this study offer a practical model for understanding imaginative disposition and ability, and provide a framework for future studies to explore imagination disposition and ability in various areas, such as craft creation.

Vorheriger Artikel The role of STEM Education in improving the quality of education: a bibliometric study

Nächster Artikel Bringing computational thinking to technology education classrooms: Hacking car activity for middle schools in the republic of korea

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Almeida, F., & Curado, M. (2019). The role of observation, cognition, and imagination in Keynes’s approach to decision-making. EconomiA, 20, 15–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econ.2019.03.001CrossRef

Anderson, L., & Krathwohl, D. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: a revision of Boom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.

Astrachan, C. B., Patel, V. K., & Wanzenried, G. (2014). A comparative study of CB-SEM and PLS-SEM for theory development in family firm research. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 5(1), 116–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2013.12.002CrossRef

Atance, C. M., Celebi, S. N., Mitchinson, S., & Mahy, C. E. (2019). Thinking about the future: Comparing children’s forced-choice versus “generative” responses in the “spoon test”. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 181, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2018.12.006CrossRef

Balakrishnan, B. (in press). Exploring the impact of design thinking tool among design undergraduates: a study on creative skills and motivation to think creatively. International Journal of Technology and Design Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-021-09712-3

Barbey, A. K., & Barsalou, L. W. (2009). Reasoning and problem solving: Models. In L. R. Squire (Ed.), Encyclopedia of neuroscience (pp. 35–43). Academic Press.

Bartlett, F. C. (1928). Types of imagination. Journal of Philosophical Studies, 3(9), 78–85. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0031819100012651CrossRef

Bell, J. D., & Macuga, K. L. (2019). Goal-directed aiming under restricted viewing conditions with confirmatory sensory feedback. Human Movement Science, 67, 102515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2019.102515CrossRef

Boyer, P. (2008). Evolutionary economics of mental time travel? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 219–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2008.03.003CrossRef

Butler, R. G. (2014). Exploratory vs confirmatory research. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/267058525

Byrne, B. M. (2016). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (3rd ed.). Routledge.

Campos, A., & Lustres, A. (2019). Gender and age differences in spatial imagery and image rotation. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 39(1), 109–119. https://doi.org/10.1177/0276236618807895CrossRef

Candy, S., & Dunagan, J. (2017). Designing an experiential scenario: The people who vanished. Futures, 86, 136–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2016.05.006CrossRef

Celnik, P. A., & Cohen, L. G. (2004). Modulation of motor function and cortical plasticity in health and disease. Restorative neurology and neuroscience, 22(3–5), 261–268.

Chen, Q., Liu, D., Zhou, C., & Tang, S. (2020). Relationship between critical thinking disposition and research competence among clinical nurses: A cross-sectional study. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 29(7–8), 1332–1340. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15201CrossRef

Chung, J., Evenson, S., & Pangaro, P. (2009). A model of the creative process. http://www.dubberly.com/concept-maps/creative-process.html

Claridge, G. (2009). Personality and psychosis. In P. J. Corr, & G. Matthews (Eds.), Handbook of personality (pp. 631–648). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511596544.039

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2000). Research methods in education (5th ed.). Routledge Falmer.

Cor, M. K. (2016). Trust me, it is valid: Research validity in pharmacy education research. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 8(3), 391–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2016.02.014CrossRef

Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1985). The NEO personality inventory manual. Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.

Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and the NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI): Professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.

Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative enquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage.

Dequech, D. (1999). Expectations and confidence under uncertainty. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 21(3), 415–430CrossRef

Doll, W. J., Xia, W., & Torkzadeh, G. (1994). A confirmatory factor analysis of the end-user computing satisfaction instrument. MIS Quarterly, 18(4), 453–461. https://doi.org/10.2307/249524CrossRef

Einarsson, A. M. (2021). Crafting, connecting, and commoning in everyday maker projects. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 156, 102715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2021.102715

Epstein, S. (2003). Cognitive-experiential self theory of personality. In T. Millon, & M. J. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Personality and social psychology (5 vol., pp. 159–184). Wiley.

Facione, P. (1990). The California critical thinking skills test: College level. California Academic Press.

Falk, R. F., & Miller, N. B. (1992). A primer for soft modelling. University of Akron Press.

Förster, J., & Higgins, E. T. (2005). How global versus local perception fits regulatory focus. Psychological Science, 16, 631–636. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01586.xCrossRef

Fortunato, V. J., & Furey, J. T. (2011). The theory of mind time: The relationships between future, past, and present thinking and psychological well-being and distress. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(1), 20–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.08.014CrossRef

Fritz, R. (1991). Creating. Fawcett Columbine

Gadassi Polack, R., Tran, T. B., & Joormann, J. (2020). “What has been is what will be”? Autobiographical memory and prediction of future events in depression. Cognition and Emotion, 34(5), 1044–1051.https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2019.1710467

Ganisa, G., Thompson, W. L., & Kosslyn, S. M. (2004). Brain areas underlying visual mental imagery and visual perception: An fMRI. Cognitive Brain Research, 20, 226–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.02.012CrossRef

Gelb, M. J. (2004). How to think like Leonardo da Vinci: Seven steps to genius every day. Dell.

Greene, J. A., Azevedo, R., & Torney-Purta, J. (2008). Modeling epistemic and ontological cognition: Philosophical perspectives and methodological directions. Educational Psychologist, 43, 142–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520802178458CrossRef

Grosjean, M., Shiffrar, M., & Knoblich, G. (2007). Fitts’s law holds for action perception. Psychological Science, 18(2), 95–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01854.xCrossRef

Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity Research: Past, present and future. American Psychologist, 5, 444–454.CrossRef

Hair, J., Black, B., Babin, B., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2009). Multivariate data analysis (7th Eds.). Prentice Hall.

Hancock, G. R., & Mueller, R. O. (Eds.). (2013). Structural equation modeling: A second course (2nd Eds.). Information Age Publishing, Inc.

Hershberger, S. L. (2003). The growth of structural equation modeling: 1994–2001. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 10, 35–46. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM1001_2CrossRef

Ho, H. C., Wang, C. C., & Cheng, Y. Y. (2013). Analysis of the scientific imagination process. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 10, 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2013.04.003CrossRef

Ichino, A. (2019). Imagination and Belief in Action. Philosophia, 47, 1517–1534. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-019-00067-7CrossRef

Isaksen, S. G., & Treffinger, D. J. (1987). Creative problem solving: Three components and six specific stages. Instructional handout. Center for Studies in Creativity.

Jankowska, D. M., Gajda, A., & Karwowski, M. (2019). How children’s creative visual imagination and creative thinking relate to their representation of space. International Journal of Science Education, 41(8), 1096–1117. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1594441CrossRef

Kafai, Y., Fields, D., & Searle, K. (2014). Electronic textiles as disruptive designs: Supporting and challenging maker activities in schools. Harvard Educational Review, 84(4), 532–556. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.84.4.46m7372370214783CrossRef

Karwowski, M. (2008a). Measuring creativity using the Test of Creative Imagination (TCI). Part 1. Presentation of a new instrument to measure creative potential. The New Educational Review, 1, 44–54

Karwowski, M. (2008b). Measuring creativity using the Test of Creative Imagination (TCI). Part 2. On validity of the TCI. The New Educational Review, 2, 216–232

Kirton, M. J. (1987). Adaptors and innovators: Cognitive style and personality. In S. Isaksen (Ed.), Frontiers of creativity research: Beyond the basics (pp. 282–304). Bearly Limited.

Klein, I., Dubois, J., Mangin, J. F., Kherif, F., Flandin, G., Poline, J. B. … Bihan, D. (2004). Retinotopic organization of visual mental images as revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. Cognitive Brain Research, 22, 26–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.07.006CrossRef

Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford.

Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice Hall.

Kosslyn, S. (1975). Information representation in visual images. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 341–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(75)90015-8CrossRef

Kosslyn, S. (1999). The role of area 17 in visual imagery: Convergent evidence from pet and rTMS. Science, 284, 167–170. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.284.5411.167CrossRef

Kosslyn, S., Ganis, G., & Thompson, W. (2001). Neural foundations of imagery. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2, 635–642. https://doi.org/10.1038/35090055CrossRef

Koven, B. D. (2020). The Infinite playground: A player’s guide to imagination (p. 104). The MIT Press.

Kozhevnikov, M., Hegarty, M., & Mayer, R. E. (2002). Revising the visualizer- verbalizer dimension: Evidence for two types of visualizers. Cognition and Instruction, 20(1), 47–77. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532690XCI2001_3CrossRef

Lane, J. D., Ronfard, S., Francioli, S. P., & Harris, P. L. (2016). Children’s imagination and belief: Prone to flights of fancy or grounded in reality? Cognition, 152, 127–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2016.03.022CrossRef

Liang, C., Chang, C. C., & Hsu, Y. (2013). Personality and psychological factors predict imagination: Evidence from Taiwan. Learning and Individual Differences, 27, 67–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2013.06.010CrossRef

Liang, C., Chang, C. C., & Liu, Y. C. (2019). Comparison of the cerebral activities exhibited by expert and novice visual communication designers during idea incubation. International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation, 7(4), 213–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/21650349.2018.1562995CrossRef

Liao, K. H., Chang, C. C., Lin, J. S., & Liang, C. (2014). Discovering the imaginative capability of technology writers: Its indicators, roots, and cultivation. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 14, 76–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2014.09.002CrossRef

Lin, K. Y., Lu, S. C., Hsiao, H. H., Kao, C. P., & Williams, P. J. (in press). Developing student imagination and career interest through a STEM project using 3D printing with repetitive modeling. Interactive Learning Environments. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1913607

Lin, W. S., Hsu, Y., & Liang, C. (2014). The mediator effects of conceiving imagination on academic performance of design students. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 24(1), 73–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-013-9244-xCrossRef

Liu, Y., & Liu, Y. (2021). Review of Bernard De Koven’s imagination theory: The epilogue of a playful journey. Entertainment Computing, 38, 100426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.entcom.2021.100426CrossRef

Lotze, M., Montoya, P., Erb, M., Hulsmann, E., Flor, H., Klose, U. … Grodd, W. (1999). Activation of cortical and cerebellar motor areas during executed and imagined hand movements: An fMRI study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11(5), 491–501. https://doi.org/10.1162/089892999563553CrossRef

Luecke, R., & Katz, R. (2003). Managing Creativity and Innovation. Havard Business School Press.

Macpherson, R., & Stanovich, K. E. (2007). Cognitive ability, thinking dispositions, and instructional set as predictors of critical thinking. Learning and Individual Differences, 17(2), 115–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2007.05.003CrossRef

Magid, R. W., Sheskin, M., & Schulz, L. E. (2015). Imagination and the generation of new ideas. Cognitive Development, 34, 99–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2014.12.008CrossRef

Manu, A. (2007). The imagination challenge: Points of departure for strategic creativity and innovation (p. 47). New Riders.

Marques, H. G., & Holland, O. (2009). Architectures for functional imagination. Neurocomputing, 72(4–6), 743–759. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2008.06.016CrossRef

Mason, L., Boldrin, A., & Ariasi, N. (2010). Epistemic metacognition in context: evaluating and learning online information. Metacognition and Learning, 4, 67–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-009-9048-2CrossRef

McLaughlin, B., Velez, J. A., Gotlieb, M. R., Thompson, B. A., & Krause-McCord, A. (2019). React to the future: political visualization, emotional reactions and political behavior. International Journal of Advertising, 38(5), 760–775. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2018.1556193CrossRef

Mulaik, S. A. (2009). Linear causal modeling with structural equations. Chapman & Hall/CRC.

Nachtigall, C., Kroehne, U., Funke, F., & Steyer, R. (2003). Why) should we use SEM? Pros and Cons of structural equation modeling. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(2), 1–22.

Nettle, D. (2001). Strong imagination: Madness, creativity and human nature. Oxford University Press.

Novák, L., & Novák, D. (2021). Estimation of coefficient of variation for structural analysis: The correlation interval approach. Structural Safety, 92, 102101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2021.102101

Osborn, A. F. (1952). Wake up your mind: 101 ways to develop creativeness. Scribners.

Parnes, S. J. (1992). Sourcebook for Creative Problem Solving. Creative Education Foundation Press.

Płotka, W. (2020). A controversy over the existence of fictional objects: Husserl and Ingarden on imagination and fiction. Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, 51(1), 33–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071773.2019.1629553CrossRef

Plsek, P. E. (1997). Creativity, Innovation, and Quality. ASQ Quality Press.

Pylyshyn, Z. (1981). The imagery debate: analogue media versus tacit knowledge. Psychological Review, 88(1), 16–45. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.88.1.16CrossRef

Reynolds, C., Osuagwu, B. A., & Vuckovic, A. (2015). Influence of motor imagination on cortical activation during functional electrical stimulation. Clinical Neurophysiology, 126, 1360–1369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2014.10.007CrossRef

Ribot, T. (1906). Essay on the creative imagination. Open Court.

Roberts, J. W., Welsh, T. N., & Wakefield, C. J. (2019). Examining the equivalence between imagery and execution-Do imagined and executed movements code relative environmental features? Behavioural Brain Research, 370, 111951. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2019.111951CrossRef

Rossman, J. (1931). The psychology of the inventor: A study of the patentee. Inventors’ Publishing.

Schacter, D. L., Addis, D. R., & Buckner, R. L. (2008). Episodic simulation of future events: Concepts, data and applications. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1124, 39–60. https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1440.001CrossRef

Schön, D. A. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books.

Shumway, W., & Tabatabai, F. (2015). The impact of critical thinking disposition on learning using business simulations. The International Journal of Management Education, 13(2), 119–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2015.01.002CrossRef

Strauman, T. J. (1998). Using imagination and personalized suggestion to change people: A commentary. Behavior Therapy, 29(4), 707–714. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7894(98)80027-0CrossRef

Stuart, M. T. (2021). Towards a dual process epistemology of imagination. Synthese, 198, 1329–1350.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-019-02116-w

Suddendorf, T., & Corballis, M. C. (2007). The evolution of foresight: What is mental time travel and is it unique to humans? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 30(3), 299–313. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X07001975CrossRef

Szameitat, A. J., Shen, S., & Sterr, A. (2007). Motor imagery of complex everyday movements. An fMRI study. Neuroimage, 34, 702–713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.09.033CrossRef

Szpunar, K. K. (2010). Episodic future thought: An emerging concept. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(2), 142–162. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610362350CrossRef

Thomas, N. (1997). Imagery and the coherence of imagination: A critique of white. The Journal of Philosophical Research, 22, 95–127. https://doi.org/10.5840/jpr_1997_20CrossRef

Torrance, E. P. (1966). The Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking-Norms-Technical Manual Research Edition-Verbal Tests, Forms A and B-Figural Tests, Forms A and B. Personnel Press.

Trotman, D. (2008). Imagination and the adolescent lifeworld: Possibilities and responsibilities in the national secondary review. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 3(2), 125–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2008.04.002CrossRef

Trotman, D. (2019). Creativity as a pastoral concern. Pastoral Care in Education, 37(1), 73–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643944.2019.1569844CrossRef

Ullman, J. B. (2001). Structural equation modeling. In B. G. Tabachnick, & L. S. Fidell (Eds.), Using multivariate statistics (3rd ed., pp. 709-819). Allyn & Bacon.

Vidergor, H. E., Givon, M., & Mendel, E. (2019). Promoting future thinking in elementary and middle school applying the multidimensional curriculum model. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 31, 19–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.10.001CrossRef

Wallas, G. (1926). The Art of Thinking. Watts.

Ward, T. B., & Wickes, K. (2009). Stable and Dynamic Properties of Category Structure Guide Imaginative Thought. Creativity Research Journal, 21(1), 15–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400410802633376CrossRef

Wiblom, J., Andree, M., & Rundgren, C. J. (2021). Self-examination, compassion and narrative imagination in students’ critical examination in science education. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 29, 100516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2021.100516CrossRef

Wiley, J., Griffin, T. D., Steffens, B., & Britt, M. A. (2020). Epistemic beliefs about the value of integrating information across multiple documents in history. Learning and Instruction, 65, 101266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.101266CrossRef

Worthington, R. L., & Whittaker, T. A. (2006). Scale development research: A content analysis and recommendations for best practices. The Counseling Psychologist, 34(6), 806–838. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000006288127CrossRef

Yoo, S. S., Freeman, D. K., McCarthyll, J. J., & Jolesz, F. A. (2003). Neural substrates of tactile imagery: a functional MRI study. Neuroreport, 14, 581–585. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001756-200303240-00011CrossRef

Yoxon, E., Pacione, S. M., Song, J. H., & Welsh, T. N. (2017). The action-specific effect of execution on imagination of reciprocal aiming movements. Human Movement Science, 54, 51–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2017.03.007CrossRef

Zhang, H., Sun, C., Liu, X., Gong, S., Yu, Q., & Zhou, Z. (in press). Boys benefit more from teacher support: Effects of perceived teacher support on primary students’ creative thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100680

Zou, Y. M., Yang, H. X., Zhang, R. T., Lui, S. S. Y., Cheung, E. F. C., & Chan, R. C. K. (2020). Validation of the Chinese version of the Multidimensional Schizotypy Scale (MSS): Convergent evidence from exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Asian Journal of Psychiatry, 51, 102057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajp.2020.102057

Titel: Correlates between imagination types and abilities in designing works
verfasst von: Chi-Ruei Tsai
Jon-Chao Hong
Kai-Hsin Tai
Publikationsdatum: 29.09.2022
Verlag: Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in: International Journal of Technology and Design Education / Ausgabe 3/2023
Print ISSN: 0957-7572
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-1804
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-022-09747-0

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2023

‘Bush kinders’: developing early years learners technology and engineering understandings

Structuring knowledge-building in online design education

Exploring humorous design techniques in product through incongruity-resolution theory

Pedagogical approaches for eliciting students’ design thinking strategies: tell-and-practice vs. contrasting cases

Supporting traditional handicrafts teaching through eye movement technology

A closer look into pedagogical roles of supporting staff in design studio courses: the case of research assistants in Turkey

Premium Partner