Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Group Decision and Negotiation 6/2019

17.09.2019

Direct Iterative Procedures for Consensus Building with Additive Preference Relations Based on the Discrete Assessment Scale

verfasst von: Zhibin Wu, Jie Xiao, Ivan Palomares

Erschienen in: Group Decision and Negotiation | Ausgabe 6/2019

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Individual consistency and group consensus are both important when seeking reliable and satisfying solutions for group decision making (GDM) problems using additive preference relations (APRs). In this paper, two new algorithms are proposed to facilitate the consensus reaching process, the first of which is used to improve the individual consistency level, and the second of which is designed to assist the group to achieve a predefined consensus level. Unlike previous GDM studies for consistency and consensus building, the proposed algorithms are essentially heuristic, modify only some of the elements in APRs to reduce the number of preference modifications in the consistency and consensus process, and have modified preferences that belong to the original evaluation scale to make the generated suggestions easier to understand. In particular, the consensus algorithm ensures that the individual consistency level is still acceptable when the predefined consensus level is achieved. Finally, classical examples and simulations are given to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approaches.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Alonso S, Chiclana F, Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E, Alcalá-Fdez J, Porcel C (2008) A consistency-based procedure to estimate missing pairwise preference values. Int J Intell Syst 23:155–175CrossRef Alonso S, Chiclana F, Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E, Alcalá-Fdez J, Porcel C (2008) A consistency-based procedure to estimate missing pairwise preference values. Int J Intell Syst 23:155–175CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cabrerizo FJ, Morente-Molinera JA, Pedrycz W, Taghavi A, Herrera-Viedma E (2018) Granulating linguistic information in decision making under consensus and consistency. Expert Syst Appl 99:83–92CrossRef Cabrerizo FJ, Morente-Molinera JA, Pedrycz W, Taghavi A, Herrera-Viedma E (2018) Granulating linguistic information in decision making under consensus and consistency. Expert Syst Appl 99:83–92CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cao D, Leung LC, Law JS (2008) Modifying inconsistent comparison matrix in analytic hierarchy process: a heuristic approach. Decis Support Syst 44(4):944–953CrossRef Cao D, Leung LC, Law JS (2008) Modifying inconsistent comparison matrix in analytic hierarchy process: a heuristic approach. Decis Support Syst 44(4):944–953CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cavallo B, D’Apuzzo L (2009) A general unified framework for pairwise comparison matrices in multicriterial methods. Int J Intell Syst 24:377–398CrossRef Cavallo B, D’Apuzzo L (2009) A general unified framework for pairwise comparison matrices in multicriterial methods. Int J Intell Syst 24:377–398CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Chiclana F, Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E (1998) Integrating three representation models in fuzzy multipurpose decision making based on fuzzy preference relations. Fuzzy Sets Syst 97:33–48CrossRef Chiclana F, Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E (1998) Integrating three representation models in fuzzy multipurpose decision making based on fuzzy preference relations. Fuzzy Sets Syst 97:33–48CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Chiclana F, Mata F, Martinez L, Herrera-viedma E, Alonso S (2008) Integration of a consistency control module within a consensus model. Int J Uncertain Fuzziness Knowl Based Syst 16:35–53CrossRef Chiclana F, Mata F, Martinez L, Herrera-viedma E, Alonso S (2008) Integration of a consistency control module within a consensus model. Int J Uncertain Fuzziness Knowl Based Syst 16:35–53CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Chu JF, Liu XW, Wang YM, Chin KS (2016) A group decision making model considering both the additive consistency and group consensus of intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations. Comput Ind Eng 101:227–242CrossRef Chu JF, Liu XW, Wang YM, Chin KS (2016) A group decision making model considering both the additive consistency and group consensus of intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations. Comput Ind Eng 101:227–242CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Contreras I (2010) A distance-based consensus model with flexible choice of rank-position weights. Group Decis Negot 19(5):441–456CrossRef Contreras I (2010) A distance-based consensus model with flexible choice of rank-position weights. Group Decis Negot 19(5):441–456CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Dong YC, Xu JP (2016) Consensus building in group decision making: searching the consensus path with minimum adjustments. Springer, New YorkCrossRef Dong YC, Xu JP (2016) Consensus building in group decision making: searching the consensus path with minimum adjustments. Springer, New YorkCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Dong YC, Zhang HJ, Herrera-Viedma E (2016) Integrating experts’ weights generated dynamically into the consensus reaching process and its applications in managing non-cooperative behaviors. Decis Support Syst 84:1–15CrossRef Dong YC, Zhang HJ, Herrera-Viedma E (2016) Integrating experts’ weights generated dynamically into the consensus reaching process and its applications in managing non-cooperative behaviors. Decis Support Syst 84:1–15CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Dong QX, Zhou X, Martínez L (2019) A hybrid group decision making framework for achieving agreed solutions based on stable opinions. Inf Sci 490(2019):227–243CrossRef Dong QX, Zhou X, Martínez L (2019) A hybrid group decision making framework for achieving agreed solutions based on stable opinions. Inf Sci 490(2019):227–243CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gong ZW, Xu C, Chiclana F, Xu XX (2016) Consensus measure with multi-stage fluctuation utility based on China’s urban demolition negotiation. Group Decis Negot 26(2):1–29 Gong ZW, Xu C, Chiclana F, Xu XX (2016) Consensus measure with multi-stage fluctuation utility based on China’s urban demolition negotiation. Group Decis Negot 26(2):1–29
Zurück zum Zitat González-Arteaga T, Andrés-Calle R, Chiclana F (2016) A new measure of consensus with reciprocal preference relations: the correlation consensus degree. Knowl Based Syst 107:104–116CrossRef González-Arteaga T, Andrés-Calle R, Chiclana F (2016) A new measure of consensus with reciprocal preference relations: the correlation consensus degree. Knowl Based Syst 107:104–116CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gupta M (2018) Consensus building process in group decision making-an adaptive procedure based on group dynamics. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 26(4):1923–1933CrossRef Gupta M (2018) Consensus building process in group decision making-an adaptive procedure based on group dynamics. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 26(4):1923–1933CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Herrera-Viedma E, Herrera F, Chiclana F, Luque M (2004) Some issues on consistency of fuzzy preference relations. Eur J Oper Res 154:98–109CrossRef Herrera-Viedma E, Herrera F, Chiclana F, Luque M (2004) Some issues on consistency of fuzzy preference relations. Eur J Oper Res 154:98–109CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Herrera-Viedma E, Alonso S, Chiclana F, Herrera F (2007) A consensus model for group decision making with incomplete fuzzy preference relations. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 15:863–877CrossRef Herrera-Viedma E, Alonso S, Chiclana F, Herrera F (2007) A consensus model for group decision making with incomplete fuzzy preference relations. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 15:863–877CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Herrera-Viedma E, Chiclana F, Herrera F, Alonso S (2007) Group decision-making model with incomplete fuzzy preference relations based on additive consistency. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part B 37(1):176–189CrossRef Herrera-Viedma E, Chiclana F, Herrera F, Alonso S (2007) Group decision-making model with incomplete fuzzy preference relations based on additive consistency. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part B 37(1):176–189CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hou F (2015) A consensus gap indicator and its application to group decision making. Group Decis Negot 24(3):415–428CrossRef Hou F (2015) A consensus gap indicator and its application to group decision making. Group Decis Negot 24(3):415–428CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kim J (2008) A model and case for supporting participatory public decision making in e democracy. Int J Intell Syst 17:179–193 Kim J (2008) A model and case for supporting participatory public decision making in e democracy. Int J Intell Syst 17:179–193
Zurück zum Zitat Li CC, Rodríguez R, Martínez L, Dong YC, Herrera F (2019) Consensus building with individual consistency control in group decision making. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 27:319–332CrossRef Li CC, Rodríguez R, Martínez L, Dong YC, Herrera F (2019) Consensus building with individual consistency control in group decision making. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 27:319–332CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Li KW, Wang ZJ, Tong XY (2016) Acceptability analysis and priority weight elicitation for interval multiplicative comparison matrices. Eur J Oper Res 250:628–638CrossRef Li KW, Wang ZJ, Tong XY (2016) Acceptability analysis and priority weight elicitation for interval multiplicative comparison matrices. Eur J Oper Res 250:628–638CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ma J, Fan ZP, Jiang YP, Mao JY, Ma L (2006) A method for repairing the inconsistency of fuzzy preference relations. Fuzzy Sets Syst 157:20–33CrossRef Ma J, Fan ZP, Jiang YP, Mao JY, Ma L (2006) A method for repairing the inconsistency of fuzzy preference relations. Fuzzy Sets Syst 157:20–33CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Orlovsky SA (1978) Decision-making with a fuzzy preference relation. Fuzzy Sets Syst 1:155–167CrossRef Orlovsky SA (1978) Decision-making with a fuzzy preference relation. Fuzzy Sets Syst 1:155–167CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Palomares I, Rodríguez RM, Martínez L (2013) An attitude-driven web consensus support system for heterogeneous group decision making. Expert Syst Appl 40(1):139–149CrossRef Palomares I, Rodríguez RM, Martínez L (2013) An attitude-driven web consensus support system for heterogeneous group decision making. Expert Syst Appl 40(1):139–149CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Parreiras RO, Ekel PY, Morais DC (2012) Fuzzy set based consensus schemes for multicriteria group decision making applied to strategic planning. Group Decis Negot 21:153–183CrossRef Parreiras RO, Ekel PY, Morais DC (2012) Fuzzy set based consensus schemes for multicriteria group decision making applied to strategic planning. Group Decis Negot 21:153–183CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Pearl J (1984) Heuristics: intelligent search strategies for computer problem solving. Addison-Wesley, Boston Pearl J (1984) Heuristics: intelligent search strategies for computer problem solving. Addison-Wesley, Boston
Zurück zum Zitat Pérez IJ, Cabrerizo FJ, Alonso S, Herrera-Viedma E (2014) A new consensus model for group decision making problems with nonhomogeneous experts. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst 44(4):494–498CrossRef Pérez IJ, Cabrerizo FJ, Alonso S, Herrera-Viedma E (2014) A new consensus model for group decision making problems with nonhomogeneous experts. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst 44(4):494–498CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rezaei J, Ortt R (2013) Multi-criteria supplier segmentation using a fuzzy preference relations based AHP. Eur J Oper Res 225(1):75–84CrossRef Rezaei J, Ortt R (2013) Multi-criteria supplier segmentation using a fuzzy preference relations based AHP. Eur J Oper Res 225(1):75–84CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill, New York Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill, New York
Zurück zum Zitat Wan SP, Wang F, Dong JY (2018) A group decision making method with interval valued fuzzy preference relations based on the geometric consistency. Inf Sci 40:87–100 Wan SP, Wang F, Dong JY (2018) A group decision making method with interval valued fuzzy preference relations based on the geometric consistency. Inf Sci 40:87–100
Zurück zum Zitat Wu ZB, Xu JP (2012) A concise consensus support model for group decision making with reciprocal preference relations based on deviation measures. Fuzzy Sets Syst 206:58–73CrossRef Wu ZB, Xu JP (2012) A concise consensus support model for group decision making with reciprocal preference relations based on deviation measures. Fuzzy Sets Syst 206:58–73CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wu ZB, Huang S, Xu JP (2019) Multi-stage optimization models for individual consistency and group consensus with preference relations. Eur J Oper Res 275:182–194CrossRef Wu ZB, Huang S, Xu JP (2019) Multi-stage optimization models for individual consistency and group consensus with preference relations. Eur J Oper Res 275:182–194CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wu ZB, Jin BM, Xu JP (2018a) Local feedback strategy for consensus building with probability-hesitant fuzzy preference relations. Appl Soft Comput 67:691–705CrossRef Wu ZB, Jin BM, Xu JP (2018a) Local feedback strategy for consensus building with probability-hesitant fuzzy preference relations. Appl Soft Comput 67:691–705CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wu ZB, Xu JP (2018b) A consensus model for large-scale group decision making with hesitant fuzzy information and changeable clusters. Inf Fusion 41:217–231CrossRef Wu ZB, Xu JP (2018b) A consensus model for large-scale group decision making with hesitant fuzzy information and changeable clusters. Inf Fusion 41:217–231CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Xu YJ, Li KW, Wang HM (2013) Distance-based consensus models for fuzzy and multiplicative preference relations. Inf Sci 253:56–73CrossRef Xu YJ, Li KW, Wang HM (2013) Distance-based consensus models for fuzzy and multiplicative preference relations. Inf Sci 253:56–73CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang GQ, Dong YC, Xu YF (2012) Linear optimization modeling of consistency issues in group decision making based on fuzzy preference relations. Expert Syst Appl 39:2415–2420CrossRef Zhang GQ, Dong YC, Xu YF (2012) Linear optimization modeling of consistency issues in group decision making based on fuzzy preference relations. Expert Syst Appl 39:2415–2420CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang HJ, Dong YC, Herrera-Viedma E (2018a) Consensus building for the heterogeneous large-scale GDM with the individual concerns and satisfactions. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 26(2):884–898CrossRef Zhang HJ, Dong YC, Herrera-Viedma E (2018a) Consensus building for the heterogeneous large-scale GDM with the individual concerns and satisfactions. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 26(2):884–898CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang Z, Kou XY, Dong QX (2018b) Additive consistency analysis and improvement for hesitant fuzzy preference relations. Expert Syst Appl 98:118–128CrossRef Zhang Z, Kou XY, Dong QX (2018b) Additive consistency analysis and improvement for hesitant fuzzy preference relations. Expert Syst Appl 98:118–128CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Direct Iterative Procedures for Consensus Building with Additive Preference Relations Based on the Discrete Assessment Scale
verfasst von
Zhibin Wu
Jie Xiao
Ivan Palomares
Publikationsdatum
17.09.2019
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Group Decision and Negotiation / Ausgabe 6/2019
Print ISSN: 0926-2644
Elektronische ISSN: 1572-9907
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-019-09636-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2019

Group Decision and Negotiation 6/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Premium Partner