nach oben

Journal of Business and Psychology

Erschienen in:

01.03.2015

Examining Applicant Reactions to the Use of Social Networking Websites in Pre-Employment Screening

verfasst von: J. William Stoughton, Lori Foster Thompson, Adam W. Meade

Erschienen in: Journal of Business and Psychology | Ausgabe 1/2015

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Purpose

Social networking websites such as Facebook allow employers to gain information about applicants which job seekers may not otherwise share during the hiring process. This multi-study investigation examined how job seekers react to this screening practice.

Design/Methodology

Study 1 (N = 175) employed a realistic selection scenario examining applicant reactions to prospective employers reviewing their social networking website. Study 2 (N = 208) employed a simulated selection scenario where participants rated their experience with a proposed selection process.

Findings

In Study 1, social networking website screening caused applicants to feel their privacy had been invaded, which ultimately resulted in lower organizational attraction. Applicants low in agreeableness had the most adverse reactions to social networking website screening. In Study 2, screening again caused applicants to feel their privacy had been invaded, resulting in lower organizational attraction and increased intentions to litigate. The organization’s positive/negative hiring decision did not moderate the relationship between screening and justice.

Implications

The results suggest organizations should consider the costs and benefits of social media screening which could reduce the attractiveness of the organization. Additionally, applicants may need to change their conceptualization of social networking websites, viewing them through the eyes of a prospective employer.

Originality/Value

This investigation proposed and tested an explanatory model of the effects of screening practices on organizational outcomes demonstrating how electronic monitoring, privacy, and applicant reactions can be integrated to better understand responses to technological innovations in the workplace.

Vorheriger Artikel Building and Sustaining Proactive Behaviors: The Role of Adaptivity and Job Satisfaction

Nächster Artikel Situational Strength as a Moderator of the Relationship Between Job Satisfaction and Job Performance: A Meta-Analytic Examination

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Results of manipulation check items with respect to consistency of screening (a moderator) revealed no differences between the inconsistent screening condition and their consistent screening counterparts, see Table 1; moreover, consistency did not satisfy the conditions for model building and was accordingly dropped from further analysis.

Study 2 also collected data on screening consistency, background analysis revealed a lack of efficacy in the manipulation, therefore this data were dropped from further analysis.

Aguinis, H. (1995). Statistical power with moderated multiple regression in management research. Journal of Management, 21(6), 1141–1158. doi:10.1177/014920639502100607.

Aguinis, H., & Stone-Romero, E. F. (1997). Methodological artifacts in moderated multiple regression and their effects on statistical power. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(1), 192–206. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.82.1.192.CrossRef

Alder, G. S., & Ambrose, M. L. (2005). Towards understanding fairness judgments associated with computer performance monitoring: An integration of the feedback, justice, and monitoring research. Human Resource Management Review, 15(1), 43–67. doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2005.01.001.CrossRef

Alder, G. S., Schminke, M., Noel, T. W., & Kuenzi, M. (2007). Employee reactions to internet monitoring: The moderating role of ethical orientation. Journal of Business Ethics, 80(3), 481–498. doi:10.1007/s10551-007-9432-2.CrossRef

Alge, B. J. (2001). Effects of computer surveillance on perceptions of privacy and procedural justice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(4), 797–804. doi:10.1037//0021-9010.86.4.797.CrossRefPubMed

Alge, B. J., Ballinger, G. A., Tangirala, S., & Oakley, J. L. (2006). Information privacy in organizations: empowering creative and extrarole performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(1), 221–232. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.1.221.CrossRefPubMed

Allen, D. G., Mahto, R. V., & Otondo, R. F. (2007). Web-based recruitment: Effects of information, organizational brand, and attitudes toward a Web site on applicant attraction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(6), 1696–1708. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1696.CrossRefPubMed

Altman, I. (1975). The environment and social behavior: Privacy, personal space, territory, crowding. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.

Barger, T., Behrend, T. S., Sharek, D. J., & Sinar, E. F. (2011). I-O and the crowd: Frequently asked questions about using Mechanical Turk for research. The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist, 49(2), 11–18.

Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44(1), 1–26. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1991.tb00688.x.CrossRef

Baruch, Y., & Holtom, B. C. (2008). Survey response rate levels and trends in organizational research. Human Relations, 61(8), 1139–1160. doi:10.1177/0018726708094863.CrossRef

Bauer, T. N., Truxillo, D. M., Sanchez, R. J., Craig, J. M., Ferrara, P., & Campion, M. A. (2001). Applicant reactions to selection: Development of the Selection Procedural Justice Scale (SPJS). Personnel Psychology, 54(2), 387–419. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2001.tb00097.x.CrossRef

Behrend, T. S., Sharek, D. J., Meade, A. W., & Wiebe, E. N. (2011). The viability of crowdsourcing for survey research. Behavior Research Methods, 43(3), 800–813. doi:10.3758/s13428-011-0081-0.CrossRefPubMed

Brockner, J., & Wiesenfeld, B. M. (1996). An integrative framework for explaining reactions to decisions: Interactive effects of outcomes and procedures. Psychological Bulletin, 120(2), 189–208. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.120.2.189.CrossRefPubMed

Brown, V. R., & Vaughn, E. D. (2011). The writing on the (Facebook) wall: The use of social networking sites in hiring decisions. Journal of Business and Psychology, 26(2), 219–225. doi:10.1007/s10869-011-9221-x.CrossRef

Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2005). Contingent and alternative employment arrangements. (USDL Publication No. 05-1433). Washington, DC.

CareerBuilder.com. (2009). Forty-five percent of employers use networking sites to research job candidates, CareerBuilder survey finds. CareerBuilder.com. Retrieved January 20, 2010, from http://www.careerbuilder.com/share/aboutus/pressreleasesdetail.aspx?id=pr519&sd=8/19/2009&ed=12/31/2009&siteid=cbpr&sc_cmp1=cb_pr519_&cbRecursionCnt=3&cbsid=0c13dc78541544338f04998d7c0dd165-317523116-JD-5.

Chen, J. V., & Ross, W. H. (2007). Individual differences and electronic monitoring at work. Information, Communication & Society, 10(4), 488–505. doi:10.1080/13691180701560002.CrossRef

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Colquitt, J. (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 386–400. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.386.CrossRefPubMed

Davison, H. K., Maraist, C., & Bing, M. N. (2011). Friend or foe? The promise and pitfalls of using social networking sites for HR decisions. Journal of Business and Psychology, 26(2), 153–159. doi:10.1007/s10869-011-9215-8.CrossRef

Ducklin, P. (2009). Sophos Australia Facebook ID probe 2009. Sophos.com. Retrieved January 19, 2010, from http://www.sophos.com/blogs/duck/g/2009/12/06/facebook-id-probe-2009/.

Duffy, E. (2006, November 1). Employers use Facebook in hiring process. The Observer. Retrieved from http://www.ndsmcobserver.com/2.2754/employers-use-facebook-in-hiring-process-1.263806.

Eddy, E. R., Stone, D. L., & Stone-Romero, E. E. (1999). The effects of information management policies on reactions to human resource information systems: An integration of privacy and procedural justice perspectives. Personnel Psychology, 52(2), 335–358. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1999.tb00164.x.CrossRef

Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook “friends:” Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1143–1168. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00367.x.CrossRef

Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. doi:10.3758/BF03193146.CrossRefPubMed

Finder, A. (2006, June 11). When a risqué online persona undermines a chance for a job. The New York Times, p. A1.

Gamliel, E., & Peer, E. (2009). Effect of framing on applicants’ reactions to personnel Selection Methods. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 17(3), 282–289. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2389.2009.00470.x.CrossRef

Gilliland, S. W. (1993). The perceived fairness of selection systems: An organizational perspective. Academy of Management Review, 18(4), 694–734. doi:10.2307/258595.

Goldberg, L. R. (1999). A broad-bandwidth, public domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models. In I. Mervielde, I. Deary, F. De Fruyt, & F. Ostendorf (Eds.), Personality Psychology in Europe (Vol. 7, pp. 7–28). Tilburg, The Netherlands: Tilburg University Press.

Goldberg, S. (2010). Young job-seekers hiding their Facebook pages. CNN.com. Retrieved April 20, 2010, from http://www.cnn.com/2010/TECH/03/29/facebook.job-seekers/index.html.

Goldman, B. M. (2001). Toward an understanding of employment discrimination claiming: An integration of organizational justice and social information processing theories. Personnel Psychology, 54(2), 361–386. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2001.tb00096.x.CrossRef

Gross, R., & Acquisti, A. (2005). Information revelation and privacy in online social networks (the Facebook case). Paper presented at ACM workshop on Privacy in the Electronic Society (WPES) (pp. 71–80). doi:10.1145/1102199.1102214.

Hausknecht, J. P., Day, D. V., & Thomas, S. C. (2004). Applicant reactions to selection procedures: An updated model and meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 57(3), 639–683. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2004.00003.x.CrossRef

Highhouse, S., Lievens, F., & Sinar, E. F. (2003). Measuring attraction to organizations. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63, 986–1001. doi:10.1177/0013164403258403.CrossRef

Hu, L., & Bentler, P. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118.CrossRef

Kluemper, D. H., Rosen, P. A., & Mossholder, K. W. (2012). Social networking websites, personality ratings, and the organizational context: More than meets the eye? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42(5), 1143–1172. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2011.00881.x.CrossRef

Kolb, K. J., & Aiello, J. R. (1996). The effects of electronic performance monitoring on stress: Locus of control as a moderator variable. Computers in Human Behavior, 12, 407–423. doi:10.1016/0747-5632(96)00016-7.CrossRef

Leventhal, G. S. (1980). What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships. In K. Gergen, M. Greenberg, & R. Willis (Eds.), Social exchange: Advances in theory and research (pp. 27–88). New York, NY: Plenum.CrossRef

Levinson, M. (2009). Job seekers to employers: Stop snooping! CIO. Retrieved June 16, 2009, from http://advice.cio.com/meridith_levinson/job_seekers_to_employers_stop_snooping.

Levinson, M. (2011). Social networks: New hotbed for hiring discrimination claims. Computer World. Retrieved June 11, 2011, from http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9215907/Social_Networks_New_Hotbed_for_Hiring_Discrimination_Claims.

Lorenzen-Huber, L., Boutain, M., Camp, L. J., Shankar, K., & Connelly, K. H. (2010). Privacy, technology, and aging: A proposed framework. Ageing International, 36(2), 232–252. doi:10.1007/s12126-010-9083-y.CrossRef

Margulis, S. T. (2003). Privacy as a social issue and behavioral concept. Journal of Social Issues, 59(2), 243–261. doi:10.1111/1540-4560.00063.CrossRef

McNichol, T. (2010). The gathering storm of social network litigation. HRO Today, 9(10). Retrieved from http://www.hrotoday.com/content/4756/gathering-storm-social-network-litigation.

Murphy, K. R. (1986). When your top choice turns you down: Effect of rejected offers on the utility of selection tests. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 133–138. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.99.1.133.CrossRef

Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2007). Mplus user’s guide (5th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.

National Association of Colleges and Employers. (2006). More than one quarter of organizations have Goggled job candidates profiles. National Association of Colleges and Employers. Retrieved December 08, 2007, from http://www.naceweb.org/press/display.asp?year=2006&prid=240.

Palank, J. (2006, July 17). Face it: “Book” no secret to employers; social sites used as background check. The Washington Times, p. A01.

Ployhart, R. E., & Ryan, A. M. (1997). Toward an explanation of applicant reactions: An examination of organizational justice and attribution frameworks. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 72(3), 308–335. doi:10.1006/obhd. 1997.2742.CrossRefPubMed

Ployhart, R. E., & Ryan, A. M. (1998). Applicants’ reactions to the fairness of selection procedures: The effects of positive rule violations and time of measurement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(1), 3–16. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.83.1.3.CrossRefPubMed

Raciot, B. M., & Williams, K. J. (1993). Perceived invasiveness and fairness of drug-testing procedures for current employees. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23(22), 1879–1891. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1993.tb01070.x.CrossRef

Ryan, A. M., Greguras, G. J., & Ployhart, R. E. (1997). Perceived job relatedness of physical abilities testing for firefighters: Exploring variations in reactions. Human Performance, 9, 219–240. doi:10.1207/s15327043hup0903_3.CrossRef

Rynes, S. L. (1993). Who’s selecting whom? Effects of selection practices on applicant attitudes and behavior. In N. Schmitt, W. C. Borman, & Associates (Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations (pp. 240–274). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Rynes, S. L., Bretz, R. D., & Gerhart, B. (1991). The importance of recruitment in job choice: A different way of looking. Personnel Psychology, 44, 487–521. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1991.tb02402.x.CrossRef

Schiffman, L. (2007, November 12). Employers using Facebook information when hiring. North by Northwestern. Retrieved from http://www.northbynorthwestern.com/2007/11/5072/employers-use-facebook-information-when-hiring/.

Shi, J., Lin, H., Wang, L., & Wang, M. (2009). Linking the Big Five personality constructs to organizational justice. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 37(2), 209–222. doi:10.2224/sbp.2009.37.2.209.CrossRef

Stanton, J. (2000). Reactions to employee performance monitoring: Framework, review, and research directions. Human Performance, 13(1), 85–113. doi:10.1207/S15327043HUP1301_4.CrossRef

Stern, J. (2012). Maryland Bill Bans Employers From Facebook Passwords. ABC News. Retrieved April 08, 2013, from http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/technology/2012/04/maryland-bill-bans-employers-from-facebook-passwords/.

Stone-Romero, E. F., Stone, D. L., & Hyatt, D. (2003). Personnel selection procedures and invasion of privacy. Journal of Social Issues, 59(2), 343–368. doi:10.1111/1540-4560.00068.CrossRef

Stoughton, J. W., Thompson, L. F., & Meade, A. W. (2013). Big Five personality traits reflected in job applicants’ social media postings. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16(11), 800–805. doi:10.1089/cyber.2012.0163.CrossRef

Stutzman, F. (2006). An evaluation of identity-sharing behavior in social network communities. Journal of the International Digital Media and Arts Association, 3(1), 10–18.

Tabak, F., & Smith, W. P. (2005). Privacy and electronic monitoring in the workplace: A model of managerial cognition and relational trust development. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 17(3), 173–189. doi:10.1007/s10672-005-6940-z.CrossRef

Tam, D. (2013). Facebook by the numbers: 1.06 billion monthly active users. C-Net. Retrieved April 12, 2013, from http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023_3-57566550-93/facebook-by-the-numbers-1.06-billion-monthly-active-users/.

Tolchinsky, P. D., McCuddy, M. K., Adams, J., Ganster, D. C., Woodman, R. W., & Fromkin, H. L. (1981). Employee perceptions of invasion of privacy: A field simulation experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 308–313. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.66.3.308.CrossRef

Truxillo, D. M., Bauer, T. N., Campion, M. A., & Paronto, M. E. (2006). A field study of the role of Big Five personality in applicant perceptions of selection fairness, self, and the hiring organization. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 14(3), 269–277. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2389.2006.00351.x.CrossRef

Turban, D. B., & Keon, T. L. (1993). Organizational attractiveness: An interactionist perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 184–193. doi:10.1037/00219010.78.2.184.CrossRef

Valdes, M., & McFarland, S. (2012, March 21). Privacy red flag raised as more job applicants asked to turn over Facebook passwords. The Associated Press. Retrieved from http://www.denverpost.com/business/ci_20218922/privacy-red-flag-raised-more-job-applicants-asked.

Vandenberg, R. (2011). Call for papers: Feature topic: Research design. Organizational Research Methods, 14, 581–582. doi:10.1177/1094428111411879.CrossRef

Westin, A. F. (1967). Privacy and freedom. New York, NY: Atheneum.

Wiehl, L. (2008). The law behind hiring practices and the social networking website Facebook. Foxnews.com. Retrieved January 17, 2010, from http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,331970,00.html.

Wortham, J. (2009). More employers use social networks to check out applicants. NYTimes.com. Retrieved January 19, 2010, from http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/08/20/more-employers-use-social-networks-to-check-out-applicants/.

Zweig, D., & Webster, J. (2003). Personality as a moderator of monitoring acceptance. Computers in Human Behavior, 19(4), 479–493. doi:10.1016/S0747-5632(02)00075-4.CrossRef

Titel: Examining Applicant Reactions to the Use of Social Networking Websites in Pre-Employment Screening
verfasst von: J. William Stoughton
Lori Foster Thompson
Adam W. Meade
Publikationsdatum: 01.03.2015
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Journal of Business and Psychology / Ausgabe 1/2015
Print ISSN: 0889-3268
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-353X
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-013-9333-6

Springer Professional

Abstract

Purpose

Design/Methodology

Findings

Implications

Originality/Value

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2015

The Moderating Influence of Perceived Organizational Values on the Burnout-Absenteeism Relationship

A Dynamic Approach to Fairness: Effects of Temporal Changes of Fairness Perceptions on Job Attitudes

The Effects of Unconsciously Derived Affect on Task Satisfaction and Performance

Building and Sustaining Proactive Behaviors: The Role of Adaptivity and Job Satisfaction

The Value of a Smile: Does Emotional Performance Matter More in Familiar or Unfamiliar Exchanges?

Situational Strength as a Moderator of the Relationship Between Job Satisfaction and Job Performance: A Meta-Analytic Examination