Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Chinese Political Science 1/2019

25.01.2019 | Research Article

Introduction: Can America and China Escape the Thucydides Trap?

verfasst von: Chunman Zhang, Xiaoyu Pu

Erschienen in: Journal of Chinese Political Science | Ausgabe 1/2019

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Can China rise peacefully? Will China and the United States go to war? As U.S. and China face rising tensions in trade, technology, cyberspace, and the South China Sea, etc., scholars are concerned about the future of the Sino-U.S. relationship. In history, the relationship between a rising power and a hegemonic power often ends up with severe conflicts, even wars. The main reason is probably the Thucydides Trap, which Graham Allison defines as the severe structural stress caused when a rising power threatens to upend a ruling one. This special issue invite scholars from China, U.S. and other countries to examine the theoretical mechanisms and policy implications of the Thucydides Trap. Each of these articles in this special issue examines unique problems and makes original contributions to our understanding of the Thucydides Trap and U.S.-China relationship. Most authors in this special issue believe that the Thucydides Trap provides a useful lens for studying the China-U.S. relationship in spite of some reservations. This special issue addresses two broad questions: First, how can one construct a thick and comprehensive understanding of the Thucydides Trap? Second, how to analyze, examine and even predict the tensions, problems and future of the Sino-U.S. relationship? There is no doubt that the current relationship between the two has deteriorated to an extent that old paradigms of conflict resolutions seem to be obsolete. Although it’s difficult to predict the future of Sino-U.S. relations, both countries especially political leaders can search for new paradigms to escape the Thucydides Trap. America and China are not destined for war, but destined for an uncertain future.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Allison, G. 2017. Destined for war: Can America and China escape Thucydides’s trap. New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. Allison, G. 2017. Destined for war: Can America and China escape Thucydides’s trap. New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Acharya, Amitav, and Barry Buzan, eds. 2009. Non-Western international relations theory: Perspectives on and beyond Asia. New York: Routledge. Acharya, Amitav, and Barry Buzan, eds. 2009. Non-Western international relations theory: Perspectives on and beyond Asia. New York: Routledge.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Fearon, J. 1995. Rationalist explanations for war. International Organization 49 (3): 379–414.CrossRef Fearon, J. 1995. Rationalist explanations for war. International Organization 49 (3): 379–414.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Mearsheimer, J. 2010. The gathering storm: China’s challenge to US power in Asia. The Chinese Journal of International Politics 3 (4): 381–396.CrossRef Mearsheimer, J. 2010. The gathering storm: China’s challenge to US power in Asia. The Chinese Journal of International Politics 3 (4): 381–396.CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Powell, R. 2006. War as a commitment problem. International Organization 60 (1): 169–203.CrossRef Powell, R. 2006. War as a commitment problem. International Organization 60 (1): 169–203.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Qin, Yaqing. 2016. A relational theory of world politics. International Studies Review 18 (1): 33–47.CrossRef Qin, Yaqing. 2016. A relational theory of world politics. International Studies Review 18 (1): 33–47.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Shirk, S. 2007. China: Fragile superpower. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Shirk, S. 2007. China: Fragile superpower. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Thucydides, translated by Rex Warner. 1972. History of the Peloponnesian war. London: Penguin Classics, Revised edition. Thucydides, translated by Rex Warner. 1972. History of the Peloponnesian war. London: Penguin Classics, Revised edition.
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Thucydides, translated by Richard Crawley and edited by Robert Strassler. 1996. The landmark Thucydides: A comprehensive guide to the Peloponnesian war. New York: Free Press. Thucydides, translated by Richard Crawley and edited by Robert Strassler. 1996. The landmark Thucydides: A comprehensive guide to the Peloponnesian war. New York: Free Press.
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Welch, D. 2003. Why international relations theorists should stop reading Thucydides. Review of International Studies 29 (3): 301–319.CrossRef Welch, D. 2003. Why international relations theorists should stop reading Thucydides. Review of International Studies 29 (3): 301–319.CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Yan, X. 2011. Ancient Chinese thought, modern Chinese power, 2011. New Jersey: Princeton University Press. Yan, X. 2011. Ancient Chinese thought, modern Chinese power, 2011. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang, C. 2017. How to merge Western theories and Chinese indigenous theories to study Chinese politics? Journal of Chinese Political Science 22 (2): 283–294.CrossRef Zhang, C. 2017. How to merge Western theories and Chinese indigenous theories to study Chinese politics? Journal of Chinese Political Science 22 (2): 283–294.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhao, T. 2009. A political world philosophy in terms of all-under-heaven (tian-xia). Diogenes 56 (1): 5–18.CrossRef Zhao, T. 2009. A political world philosophy in terms of all-under-heaven (tian-xia). Diogenes 56 (1): 5–18.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Introduction: Can America and China Escape the Thucydides Trap?
verfasst von
Chunman Zhang
Xiaoyu Pu
Publikationsdatum
25.01.2019
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Journal of Chinese Political Science / Ausgabe 1/2019
Print ISSN: 1080-6954
Elektronische ISSN: 1874-6357
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11366-019-09609-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2019

Journal of Chinese Political Science 1/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Premium Partner