nach oben

Hydrogeology Journal

Erschienen in:

01.12.2009 | Report

Assessment of aquifer vulnerability based on GIS and DRASTIC methods: a case study of the Senirkent-Uluborlu Basin (Isparta, Turkey)

verfasst von: Erhan Sener, Sehnaz Sener, Aysen Davraz

Erschienen in: Hydrogeology Journal | Ausgabe 8/2009

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Aquifer vulnerability has been assessed in the Senirkent-Uluborlu Basin within the Egirdir Lake catchment (Turkey) using the DRASTIC method, based on a geographic information system (GIS). There is widespread agriculture in the basin, and fertilizer (nitrate) and pesticide applications have caused groundwater contamination as a result of leaching. According to hydrogeological data from the study area, surface water and groundwater flow are towards Egirdir Lake. Hence, aquifer vulnerability in the basin should be determined by water quality in Egirdir Lake. DRASTIC layers were prepared using data such as rainfall, groundwater level, aquifer type, and hydraulic conductivity. These data were obtained from hydrogeological investigations and literature. A regional-scale aquifer-vulnerability map of the basin was prepared using overlay analysis with the aid of GIS. A DRASTIC vulnerability map, verified by nitrate in groundwater data, shows that the defined areas are compatible with land-use data. It is concluded that 20.8% of the basin area is highly vulnerable and urgent pollution-preventions measures should be taken for every kind of relevant activity within the whole basin.

Vorheriger Artikel Stream-aquifer interactions in the Maules Creek catchment, Namoi Valley, New South Wales, Australia

Nächster Artikel Constraints on water chemistry by chemical weathering in the Lake Qinghai catchment, northeastern Tibetan Plateau (China): clues from Sr and its isotopic geochemistry

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Ahmed AA (2009) Using generic and pesticide DRASTIC GIS-based models for vulnerability assessment of the Quaternary aquifer at Sohag, Egypt. Hydrogeol J. doi:10.1007/s10040-009-0433-3

Al-Adamat RAN, Foster IDL, Baban SMJ (2003) Groundwater vulnerability and risk mapping for the Basaltic aquifer of the Azraq basin of Jordan using GIS, remote sensing and DRASTIC. Appl Geogr 23:303–324CrossRef

Al-Zabet T (2002) Evaluation of aquifer vulnerability to contamination potential using the DRASTIC method. Env Geol 43:203–208CrossRef

Aller L, Bennett T, Lehr JH, Petty RH, Hackett G (1987) DRASTIC: a standardised system for evaluating groundwater pollution potential using hydrogeologic settings. USEPA Report 600/2- 87/035, Robert S. Kerr Environmental Research Laboratory, Ada, Oklahoma

Atay R, Bulut C (2005) Beyşehir, Egirdir, Kovada, Çivril ve Karakuyu Göllerinde Su Kirliliği Projesi [The project of water contamination in the Beyşehir, Egirdir, Kovada, Çivril and Karakuyu Lakes], Tarım ve Köy İşleri Bakanlığı-Egirdir Su Ürünleri Araştırma Enstitüsü Müdürlüğü Araştırma Raporu. Isparta, Turkey

Baalousha H (2006) Vulnerability assessment for the Gaza Strip, Palestine using DRASTIC. Env Geol 50:405–414CrossRef

Bachmat Y, Collin M (1990) Management oriented assessment of groundwater vulnerability to pollution. Israel Hydrological Service Report, Israel Hydrological Service, Jerusalem

Cameron E, Peloso GF (2001) An application of fuzzy logic to the assessment of aquifers’ pollution potential. Env Geol 40:1305–1315CrossRef

Civita M (1994) Le carte della vulnerabilit`a degli acquiferi all’inquinamiento: teoria e pratica [Contamination vulnerability mapping of the aquifer: theory and practice]. Quaderni di Tecniche di Protezione Ambientale, Pitagora, Italy

Doerfliger N, Zwahlen F (1998) Groundwater vulnerability mapping in karstic regions (EPIK): application to Groundwater Protection Zones. Swiss Agency for the Environment, Forests and Landscape (SAEFL), Bern, Switzerland

Doerfliger N, Jeannin PY, Zwahlen F (1999) Water vulnerability assessment in karst environments: a new method of defining protection areas using a multi-attribute approach and GIS tools (EPIK method). Env Geol 39(2):165–176CrossRef

Ehteshami M, Peralta RC, Eisele H, Deer H, Tindall T (1991) Assessing pesticide contamination to ground water: a rapid approach. Ground Water 29:862–868CrossRef

Foster S (1987) Fundamental concepts in aquifer vulnerability, pollution risk and protection strategy. In: Van Duijvenbooden W, Van Waegeningh HG (eds) Vulnerability of soil and groundwater to pollutants. Committee on Hydrological Research, The Hague, pp 69–86

Gogu R, Dassargues A (2000) Current trends and future challenges in groundwater vulnerability assessment using overly and index methods. Env Geol 39(6):549–559CrossRef

Goldscheider N, Klute M, Sturm S, Hotzl H (2000) The PI method: a GIS-based approach to mapping groundwater vulnerability with special consideration of karst aquifers. Z Angew Geol 46(3):157–166

Hearne GM, Wireman A, Campbell S, Turner A, Ingersall GP (1992) Vulnerability of the uppermost groundwater to contamination in the Greater Denver Area, Colorado. US Geol Surv Water Resour Invest Rep 92-4143, 241 pp

Hrkal Z (2001) Vulnerability of groundwater to acid deposition, Jizerske Mountains, northern Czech Republic: construction and reliability of a GIS-based vulnerability map. Hydrogeol J 9:348–357CrossRef

Jamrah A, Futaisi AA, Rajmohan N, Al-Yaroubi S (2007) Assessment of groundwater vulnerability in the coastal region of Oman using DRASTIC index method in GIS environment. Environ Monit Assess. doi:10.1007/s10661-007-0104-6

Kim Y, Hamm S (1999) Assessment of the potential for groundwater contamination using the DRASTIC/EGIS technique, Cheongju area, South Korea. Hydrogeol J 7:227–235CrossRef

Koçyiğit A (1983) Tectonics of Hoyran Lake (Isparta Angle) region (in Turkish). Bull Geol Soc Turkey C(26):1–10

Lake IR, Lovett AA, Hiscock KM (2003) Evaluating factors influencing groundwater vulnerability to nitrate pollution: developing the potential of GIS. J Environ Manage 68:315–328CrossRef

Lee S (2003) Evaluation of waste disposal site using the DRASTIC system in southern Korea. Env Geol 44:654–664CrossRef

Margat J (1968) Vulnerabilite des nappes d’eau souterraine a la pollution [Groundwater vulnerability to contamination]. Bases de al cartographie, (Doc.) 68 SGC 198 HYD, BRGM, Orleans, France

Melloul AJ, Collin M (1998) A proposed index for aquifer water-quality assessment: the case of Israel’s Sharon region. J Environ Manage 54(2):131–142CrossRef

Mendoza JA, Barmen G (2006) Assessment of groundwater vulnerability in the Río Artiguas basin, Nicaragua. Env Geol 50:569–580CrossRef

Merchant JW (1994) GIS-based groundwater pollution hazard assessment: a critical review of the DRASTIC model. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 60(9):1117–1127

Panagopoulos GP, Antonakos AK, Lambrakis NJ (2006) Optimization of the DRASTIC method for groundwater vulnerability assessment via the use of simple statistical methods and GIS. Hydrogeol J 14:894–911CrossRef

Rahman A (2008) A GIS based DRASTIC model for assessing groundwater vulnerability in shallow aquifer in Aligarh, India. Appl Geogr 28:32–53CrossRef

Rosen L (1994) A study of the DRASTIC methodology with emphasis on Swedish conditions. Ground Water 32:278–285CrossRef

Rupert MG (2001) Calibration of the DRASTIC ground water vulnerability mapping method. Ground Water 39(4):625–630CrossRef

Secunda S, Collin M, Melloul AJ (1998) Groundwater vulnerability assessment using a composite model combining DRASTIC with extensive land use in Israel’s Sharon region. J Environ Manage 54:39–57CrossRef

Seyman F (2005) Hydrogeological investigations of Senirkent-Uluborlu (Isparta) basin (in Turkish). M Sci Thesis, Suleyman Demirel University, Turkey

Tay S (2005) Geological and geotechnical investigations in Senirkent-Uluborlu (Isparta) Basin for solid waste landfill site selection (in Turkish). M Sci Thesis, Suleyman Demirel University, Turkey

Thirumalaivasan D, Karmegam M, Venugopal K (2003) AHP-DRASTIC: software for specific aquifer vulnerability assessment using DRASTIC model and GIS. Environ Model Softw 18:645–656CrossRef

TSE (Turkish Standards Institute)(2005) Water intended for human consumption (in Turkish). TS266, TSE, Ankara, Turkey

USEPA (1985) DRASTIC: a standard system for evaluating groundwater potential using hydrogeological settings. WA/EPA Series, Ada, OK, USA

Van Stempvoort D, Ewert L, Wassenaar L (1993) Aquifer vulnerability index (AVI): a GIS compatible method for groundwater vulnerability mapping. Can Water Resour J 18:25–37

Vias JM, Andreo B, Perles MJ, Carrasco F (2005) A comparative study of four schemes for groundwater vulnerability mapping in a diffuse flow carbonate aquifer under Mediterranean climatic conditions. Env Geol 47:586–595CrossRef

Vias JM, Andreo B, Perles MJ, Carrasco F, Vadillo I, Jimenez P (2006) Proposed method for groundwater vulnerability mapping in carbonate (karstic) aquifers: the COP method. Application in two pilot sites in southern Spain. Hydrogeol J 14:912–925CrossRef

Vrba J, Zaporozec A (1994) Guidebook on mapping groundwater vulnerability. IAH, Heise, Hanover, Germany

Wang Y, Merkel BJ, Li Y, Ye H, Fu S, Ihm D (2007) Vulnerability of groundwater in Quaternary aquifers to organic contaminants: a case study in Wuhan City, China. Env Geol 53:479–484CrossRef

WHO (1998) Guidelines for drinking water quality. Addendum to vol 2, 2nd edn. Health criteria and other supporting information (WHO/EOS/98.1). World Health Organization, Geneva

Wischmeier WH, Smith DD (1978) Predicting rainfall-erosion losses: a guide to conservation planning. Agr. handbook no. 537, USDA, Washington, DC

Titel: Assessment of aquifer vulnerability based on GIS and DRASTIC methods: a case study of the Senirkent-Uluborlu Basin (Isparta, Turkey)
verfasst von: Erhan Sener
Sehnaz Sener
Aysen Davraz
Publikationsdatum: 01.12.2009
Verlag: Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in: Hydrogeology Journal / Ausgabe 8/2009
Print ISSN: 1431-2174
Elektronische ISSN: 1435-0157
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-009-0497-0

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2009

Groundwater balance in the Khor Arbaat basin, Red Sea State, eastern Sudan

Geological structure, recharge processes and underground drainage of a glacierised karst aquifer system, Tsanfleuron-Sanetsch, Swiss Alps

Analysis of flow processes in fractured chalk under pumped and ambient conditions (UK)

A modelling study of the effects of land management and climatic variations on groundwater inflow to Lake St Lucia, South Africa

Fractured bedrock and saprolite hydrogeologic controls on groundwater/surface-water interaction: a conceptual model (Australia)

Constraints on water chemistry by chemical weathering in the Lake Qinghai catchment, northeastern Tibetan Plateau (China): clues from Sr and its isotopic geochemistry