nach oben

Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery

Erschienen in:

05.03.2020 | Original Article

Mild sodium hydroxide pretreatment of tobacco product waste to enable efficient bioethanol production by separate hydrolysis and fermentation

verfasst von: Sare Sarbishei, Amir Goshadrou, Mohammad Sadegh Hatamipour

Erschienen in: Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery | Ausgabe 6/2021

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Tobacco product waste (TPW) was considered as a novel and sustainable feedstock for second-generation ethanol production. TPW with over ~ 44% cellulose content was efficiently pretreated using concentrated (10% W/V) sodium hydroxide (SH) solution at different temperatures (0, 25, and 80 °C) and retention times (3 and 6 h). Subsequently, the pretreated biomass was subjected to separate enzymatic hydrolysis and fermentation by the filamentous fungus Mucor hiemalis. Promising results were achieved following 3 h pretreatment of TPW at 80 °C, whereas the hydrolysis yield was substantially increased up to 91.3%. Besides, comprehensive tacking of key features of biomass (e.g., composition, crystalline structure, surface hydrophilicity and morphology, and accessible surface area) by semi-quantitative methods together with FTIR and SEM observations revealed major improvements occurred after mild SH pretreatment. Consequently, the maximum ethanol production as high as ~ 97% of theoretical ethanol yield was obtained, while it was only 44.4% from the untreated TPW. The implication of the work could possibly support TPW utilization for large-scale ethanol production in a tobacco-based biorefinery framework.

Vorheriger Artikel The characterisation of biochar and biocrude products of the hydrothermal liquefaction of raw digestate biomass

Nächster Artikel Fed-batch enzymatic hydrolysis of plantain pseudostem to fermentable sugars production and the impact of particle size at high solids loadings

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Yuan Z, Wen Y, Kapu NS (2018) Ethanol production from bamboo using mild alkaline pre-extraction followed by alkaline hydrogen peroxide pretreatment. Bioresour Technol 247:242–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.09.080CrossRef

Sadhukhan J, Martinez-Hernandez E, Amezcua-Allieri MA, Aburto J, Honorato SJA (2019) Economic and environmental impact evaluation of various biomass feedstock for bioethanol production and correlations to lignocellulosic composition. Bioresour Technol Rep 7:100230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biteb.2019.100230CrossRef

Zhao C, Zou Z, Li J, Jia H, Liesche J, Chen S, Fang H (2018) Efficient bioethanol production from sodium hydroxide pretreated corn stover and rice straw in the context of on-site cellulase production. Renew Energy 118:14–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.11.001CrossRef

Kooravand S, Goshadrou A, Hatamipour MS, products (2017) Enhanced ethanol production from Glycyrrhiza glabra residue by fungus Mucor hiemalis. Ind Crop Prod 108:767–774. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.07.030

Thanapimmetha A, Saisriyoot M, Khomlaem C, Chisti Y, Srinophakun P (2019) A comparison of methods of ethanol production from sweet sorghum bagasse. Biochem Eng J 151:107352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2019.107352CrossRef

Ahmed El-Imam AM, Greetham D, Du C, Dyer PS (2019) The development of a biorefining strategy for the production of biofuel from sorghum milling waste. Biochem Eng J 150:107288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2019.107288CrossRef

Barla FG, Kumar S (2019) Tobacco biomass as a source of advanced biofuels. Biofuels 10(3):335–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/17597269.2016.1242684CrossRef

Barrena R, Vázquez F, Sánchez A (2008) Dehydrogenase activity as a method for monitoring the composting process. Bioresour Technol 99(4):905–908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2007.01.027CrossRef

Yang Z, Zhang S, Liu L, Li X, Chen H, Yang H, Wang X (2012) Combustion behaviours of tobacco stem in a thermogravimetric analyser and a pilot-scale fluidized bed reactor. Bioresour Technol 110:595–602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.12.119CrossRef

10.

World Health Organization. Economically sustainable alternatives to tobacco growing (Fifth session, 2012). WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control

11.

Nikolić S, Lazić V, Veljović Đ, Mojović L (2017) Production of bioethanol from pre-treated cotton fabrics and waste cotton materials. Carbohydr Polym 164:136–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.01.090CrossRef

12.

Yu M, Li J, Chang S, Zhang L, Mao Y, Cui T, Yan Z, Luo C, Li S (2016) Bioethanol production using the sodium hydroxide pretreated sweet sorghum bagasse without washing. Fuel 175:20–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2016.02.012CrossRef

13.

Zabed H, Sahu J, Suely A, Boyce A, Faruq G (2017) Bioethanol production from renewable sources: current perspectives and technological progress. Renew Sust Energ Rev 71:475–501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.12.076CrossRef

14.

Brown LM, Hawkins GM, Doran-Peterson J (2017) Ethanol production from renewable lignocellulosic biomass. In: Love J, Bryant JA (eds) Biofuels and bioenergy. John Wiley & Sons Ltd., India, pp 89–104CrossRef

15.

Khare SK, Pandey A, Larroche C (2015) Current perspectives in enzymatic saccharification of lignocellulosic biomass. Biochem Eng J 102:38–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2015.02.033CrossRef

16.

Gupta A, Verma JP (2015) Sustainable bio-ethanol production from agro-residues: a review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 41:550–567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.08.032CrossRef

17.

Taherzadeh MJ, Karimi K (2008) Pretreatment of lignocellulosic wastes to improve ethanol and biogas production: a review. Int J Mol Sci 9(9):1621–1651. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms9091621CrossRef

18.

Zabed H, Sahu JN, Boyce AN, Faruq G (2016) Fuel ethanol production from lignocellulosic biomass: an overview on feedstocks and technological approaches. Renew Sustain Energ Rev 66:751–774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.08.038CrossRef

19.

de Barros RdRO, Becarelli P, de Oliveira RA, Tognotti L, Bon EPdS (2019) Triticum spelta straw hydrothermal pretreatment for the production of glucose syrups via enzymatic hydrolysis. Biochem Eng J 151:107340. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2019.107340

20.

Botella C, Zhang K, Baugh A, Liang Y, Sivakumar SV (2019) Reversible acid pretreatment scale up studies for the production of cellulosic ethanol from ensiled sweet sorghum. Biochem Eng J 150:107266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2019.107266CrossRef

21.

Marković M, Markov S, Grujić O, Mojović L, Kocić-Tanackov S, Vukašinović M, Pejin J (2014) Microwave as a pre-treatment of triticale for bioethanol fermentation and utilization of the stillage for lactic acid fermentation. Biochem Eng J 85:132–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2014.01.011CrossRef

22.

Goshadrou A (2019) Bioethanol production from Cogongrass by sequential recycling of black liquor and wastewater in a mild-alkali pretreatment. Fuel 258:116141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2019.116141CrossRef

23.

Goshadrou A, Karimi K, Taherzadeh MJ (2011) Bioethanol production from sweet sorghum bagasse by Mucor hiemalis. Ind Crop Prod 34(1):1219–1225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2011.04.018CrossRef

24.

Khonngam T, Salakkam A (2019) Bioconversion of sugarcane bagasse and dry spent yeast to ethanol through a sequential process consisting of solid-state fermentation, hydrolysis, and submerged fermentation. Biochem Eng J 150:107284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2019.107284CrossRef

25.

Karimi K, Shafiei M, Kumar R (2013) Progress in physical and chemical pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass. In: Gupta VK, Tuohy MG (eds) Biofuel technologies. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 53–96CrossRef

26.

Chilari D, Dimos K, Georgoula G, Paschos T, Mamma D, Louloudi A, Papayannakos N, Kekos D (2017) Bioethanol production from alkali-treated cotton stalks at high solids loading applying non-isothermal simultaneous saccharification and fermentation. Waste Biomass Valoriz 8(6):1919–1929. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-016-9818-4CrossRef

27.

Hoşgün EZ, Berikten D, Kıvanç M, Bozan B (2017) Ethanol production from hazelnut shells through enzymatic saccharification and fermentation by low-temperature alkali pretreatment. Fuel 196:280–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2017.01.114CrossRef

28.

Fang Z, Smith RL, Qi X (2017) Production of platform chemicals from sustainable resources, vol 7. Biofuels and biorefineries. Springer, SingaporeCrossRef

29.

Qing Q, Zhou L, Guo Q, Gao X, Zhang Y, He Y, Zhang Y (2017) Mild alkaline presoaking and organosolv pretreatment of corn stover and their impacts on corn stover composition, structure, and digestibility. Bioresour Technol 233:284–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.02.106CrossRef

30.

Guo G-N, Cai B, Li R, Pan X, Wei M, Zhang C (2019) Enhancement of saccharification and ethanol conversion from tobacco stalks by chemical pretreatment. Biomass Convers Biorefin:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-019-00478-2

31.

Farran I, Fernandez-San Millan A, Ancin M, Larraya L, Veramendi J (2014) Increased bioethanol production from commercial tobacco cultivars overexpressing thioredoxin f grown under field conditions. Mol Breed 34(2):457–469. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11032-014-0047-xCrossRef

32.

Yuan Z, Wei W, Wen Y, Wang R (2019) Comparison of alkaline and acid-catalyzed steam pretreatments for ethanol production from tobacco stalk. Ind Crop Prod 142:111864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.111864CrossRef

33.

Mohsenzadeh A, Jeihanipour A, Karimi K, Taherzadeh MJ (2012) Alkali pretreatment of softwood spruce and hardwood birch by NaOH/thiourea, NaOH/urea, NaOH/urea/thiourea, and NaOH/PEG to improve ethanol and biogas production. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 87(8):1209–1214. https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.3695CrossRef

34.

Sluiter A, Hames B, Ruiz R, Scarlata C, Sluiter J, Templeton D, Crocker D (2008) Determination of structural carbohydrates and lignin in biomass. National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) analytical procedures, NREL/TP-510-42618

35.

Jung SJ, Kim SH, Chung IM (2015) Comparison of lignin, cellulose, and hemicellulose contents for biofuels utilization among 4 types of lignocellulosic crops. Biomass Bioenergy 83:322–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2015.10.007CrossRef

36.

Kim SJ, Kim MY, Jeong SJ, Jang MS, Chung IM (2012) Analysis of the biomass content of various Miscanthus genotypes for biofuel production in Korea. Ind Crops Prod 38:46–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2012.01.003CrossRef

37.

TAPPI Useful Methods (1996) TAPPI useful method 256. TAPPI Press, Atlanta

38.

Chandra R, Ewanick S, Hsieh C, Saddler JN (2008) The characterization of pretreated lignocellulosic substrates prior to enzymatic hydrolysis, part 1: a modified Simons' staining technique. Biotechnol Prog 24(5):1178–1185. https://doi.org/10.1002/btpr.33CrossRef

39.

Wiman M, Dienes D, Hansen MA, van der Meulen T, Zacchi G, Liden G (2012) Cellulose accessibility determines the rate of enzymatic hydrolysis of steam-pretreated spruce. Bioresour Technol 126:208–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.08.082CrossRef

40.

Carrillo A, Colom X, Sunol JJ, Saurina J (2004) Structural FTIR analysis and thermal characterisation of lyocell and viscose-type fibres. Eur Polym J 40(9):2229–2234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2004.05.003CrossRef

41.

Goshadrou A, Karimi K, Taherzadeh MJ (2013) Ethanol and biogas production from birch by NMMO pretreatment. Biomass Bioenergy 49(0):95–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.12.013CrossRef

42.

Sues A, Millati R, Edebo L, Taherzadeh MJ (2005) Ethanol production from hexoses, pentoses, and dilute-acid hydrolyzate by Mucor indicus. FEMS Yeast Res 5(6–7):669–676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.femsyr.2004.10.013CrossRef

43.

Hu F, Jung S, Ragauskas A (2012) Pseudo-lignin formation and its impact on enzymatic hydrolysis. Bioresour Technol 117:7–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.04.037CrossRef

44.

Zheng J, Choo K, Rehmann L (2015) The effects of screw elements on enzymatic digestibility of corncobs after pretreatment in a twin-screw extruder. Biomass Bioenergy 74:224–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2015.01.022CrossRef

45.

Carvalho DMD, Queiroz JHD, Colodette JL (2016) Assessment of alkaline pretreatment for the production of bioethanol from eucalyptus, sugarcane bagasse and sugarcane straw. Ind Crop Prod 94:932–941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.09.069CrossRef

46.

Tuzzin G, Godinho M, Dettmer A, Zattera AJ (2016) Nanofibrillated cellulose from tobacco industry wastes. Carbohydr Polym 148:69–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.04.045CrossRef

47.

Cardoso CR, Miranda MR, Santos KG, Ataíde CH (2011) Determination of kinetic parameters and analytical pyrolysis of tobacco waste and sorghum bagasse. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 92(2):392–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2011.07.013CrossRef

48.

Yuan Z, Li G, Hegg EL (2018) Enhancement of sugar recovery and ethanol production from wheat straw through alkaline pre-extraction followed by steam pretreatment. Bioresour Technol 266:194–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.06.065CrossRef

49.

Khaleghian H, Molaverdi M, Karimi K (2017) Silica removal from rice straw to improve its hydrolysis and ethanol production. Ind Eng Chem Res 56(35):9793–9798. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.7b02830CrossRef

50.

Bertran MS, Dale BE (1985) Enzymatic hydrolysis and recrystallization behavior of initially amorphous cellulose. Biotechnol Bioeng 27(2):177–181. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.260270212CrossRef

51.

Weiss ND, Felby C, Thygesen LG (2018) Water retention value predicts biomass recalcitrance for pretreated lignocellulosic materials across feedstocks and pretreatment methods. Cellulose 25(6):3423–3434. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-018-1798-zCrossRef

52.

Goshadrou A, Karimi K, Lefsrud M (2013) Characterization of ionic liquid pretreated aspen wood using semi-quantitative methods for ethanol production. Carbohydr Polym 96(2):440–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.04.017CrossRef

53.

Meng X, Wells T, Sun Q, Huang F, Ragauskas A (2015) Insights into the effect of dilute acid, hot water or alkaline pretreatment on the cellulose accessible surface area and the overall porosity of Populus. Green Chem 17(8):4239–4246. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5GC00689ACrossRef

54.

Chandra RP, Ewanick SM, Chung PA, Au-Yeung K, Del Rio L, Mabee W, Saddler JN (2009) Comparison of methods to assess the enzyme accessibility and hydrolysis of pretreated lignocellulosic substrates. Biotechnol Lett 31(8):1217–1222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-009-9993-5CrossRef

55.

Tewari N, Vasudevan P, Guha BK (2005) Study on biosorption of Cr(VI) by Mucor hiemalis. Biochem Eng J 23(2):185–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2005.01.011

56.

Heidary Vinche M, Asachi R, Zamani A, Karimi K (2013) Ethanol and chitosan production from wheat hydrolysate by Mucor hiemalis. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 88(2):255–260. https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.3822CrossRef

57.

Asachi R, Karimi K, Taherzadeh MJ (2011) Fungal autolysate as a nutrient supplement for ethanol and chitosan production by Mucor indicus. Biotechnol Lett 33(12):2405–2409. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-011-0725-2CrossRef

58.

Li T, Fang Q, Chen H, Qi F, Ou X, Zhao X, Liu D (2017) Solvent-based delignification and decrystallization of wheat straw for efficient enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose and ethanol production with low cellulase loadings. RSC Adv 7(17):10609–10617. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RA28509KCrossRef

59.

D-y M, Li Q, Chiang V, Jameel H, H-m C, Lucia L (2014) The influence of lignin-carbohydrate complexes on the cellulase-mediated saccharification I: transgenic black cottonwood (western balsam poplar, California poplar) P. trichocarpa including the xylan down-regulated and the lignin down-regulated lines. Fuel 119:207–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2013.11.047CrossRef

Titel: Mild sodium hydroxide pretreatment of tobacco product waste to enable efficient bioethanol production by separate hydrolysis and fermentation
verfasst von: Sare Sarbishei
Amir Goshadrou
Mohammad Sadegh Hatamipour
Publikationsdatum: 05.03.2020
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery / Ausgabe 6/2021
Print ISSN: 2190-6815
Elektronische ISSN: 2190-6823
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-020-00644-x

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2021

Mining the prospective of Candida tropicalis YES3 in Napier biomass saccharification

Enzymatic conversion of treated oil palm empty fruit bunches fiber into fermentable sugars: optimization of solid and protein loadings and surfactant effects

Optimization of oleaginous seeds liquefaction using response surface methodology

Magnetically assisted commercially attractive chemo-enzymatic route for the production of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural from inulin

Chemically modified biochar derived from effluent treatment plant sludge of a distillery for the removal of an emerging pollutant, tetracycline, from aqueous solution

Pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass at atmospheric conditions by using different organosolv liquors: a comparison of lignins