Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
ATZ-Fachkongress

Chassis.tech plus 2024


4 Kongresse in einer Veranstaltung

Treffen Sie in München die Fachleute von Chassis, Lenkung, Bremsen sowie Reifen/Räder.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
International Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems Research
Erschienen in: International Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems Research 2/2022

06.06.2022

Relevance Rule in Adding Up Non-Given Attributes in Travel Stated Choices: A Consideration Under Anchoring Perspective

verfasst von: Nguyen Hoang-Tung

Erschienen in: International Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems Research | Ausgabe 2/2022

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This study is among the first studies investigating how non-given attributes are used in deciding stated choices for daily travel under anchoring perspective. Our theoretical work leads us to a conceptual model that non-given attributes are systematically included in the choice making process based on their relevance to the choice decision. The relevant rule for re-packing of the attribute set is activated in a way that the involvement of non-given attributes does not eliminate the influence of given attributes on choices. Notably, more non-given attributes are involved in choice decision when respondents deal with cases that are more difficult to trade-off between given attributes. To obtain empirical supports, a paper-based questionnaire interview was conducted. Findings based on 649 individual responses of travellers in Can Tho city, Vietnam successfully showed that travel time and travel cost significantly influence the stated choice between bus and motorcycle regardless of the involvement of respondents’ travel experiences. In addition, it was observed that all the investigated travel experiences were associated with stated choices in more difficult cases (more efforts to trade-off between travel time and travel cost) while fewer travel experiences were associated with stated choices in less difficult cases (less efforts to trade-off between travel time and travel cost). The positive association between the judgement difficulty based on given attributes and the number of anchors associated with stated choices suggests that the search engine of respondents is task-dependent and it tends to expand its searching scope accordingly to the task difficulty. This implies that the anchoring effect is more complicated in more difficult cases, and that stated scenarios are not equally treated by respondents. As such, any conclusion of stated choices should be made in full awareness of this important phenomenon.
Vorheriger Artikel Proposed Policy to Manage the Barrier of the Implementation of Intelligent Transportation System
Nächster Artikel The Car-Following Model Based on the Drivers' Psychological Characteristics

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

ATZelectronics worldwide

ATZlectronics worldwide is up-to-speed on new trends and developments in automotive electronics on a scientific level with a high depth of information. 

Order your 30-days-trial for free and without any commitment.

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Weitere Produktempfehlungen anzeigen
Literatur
1.
Hensher, D.: How do respondents process stated choice experiments? Attribute consideration under varying information load. J. Appl. Econom. 21(6), 861–878 (2006)MathSciNetCrossRef
2.
Arentze, T., Borgers, A., Timmermans, H., DelMistro, R.: Transport stated choice responses: effects of task complexity, presentation format and literacy. Transp. Res. 39E, 229–244 (2003)
3.
Hess, S.: Impact of unimportant attributes in stated choice surveys. Eur. J. Transp. Infrastructure Res. 14(4), 349–361 (2014)
4.
Scarpa, R., Thiene, M., Hensher, D.: Monitoring choice task attribute attendance in nonmarket valuation of multiple park management services: Does it matter? Land. Econ. 86, 817–839 (2010)CrossRef
5.
Campbell, D., Hensher, D.A., Scarpa, R.: Non-attendance to attributes in environmental choice analysis: a latent class specification. J. Environ. Planning Manage. 54(8), 1061–1076 (2011)CrossRef
6.
Hensher, D.A.: Hypothetical bias, choice experiments and willingness to pay. Transp. Res. Part. B Methodol. 44(6), 735–752 (2010)CrossRef
7.
Hess, S., Stathopoulos, A., Campbell, D., O’Neill, V., Caussade, S.: It’s not that I don’t care, I just don’t care very much: confounding between attribute nonattendance and taste heterogeneity. Transportation. 40(3), 583–607 (2013)CrossRef
8.
Collins, A.T., Rose, J.M., Hensher, D.A.: Specification issues in a generalised random parameters attribute nonattendance model. Transp. Res. Part. B. 56, 234–253 (2013)CrossRef
9.
Kløjgaard, M.E.: Designing a stated choice experiment: the value of a qualitative process. J. Choice Modeling. 5(2), 1–18 (2012)CrossRef
10.
Coast, J., Horrocks, S.: Developing attributes and levels for discrete choice experiments using qualitative methods. J. Health Serv. Res. Policy. 12(1), 25–30 (2007)CrossRef
11.
Hoang-Tung, N., Kubota, H.: Application of attitude theory for identifying the effects of non-attendance attributes in stated choice surveys. Travel Behav. Soc. Vol. 12, 64–71 (2018)CrossRef
12.
Conlisk, J.: Why bounded rationality? J. Econ. Lit. 34(2), 669–700 (1996)
13.
Jager, W.: Breaking bad habits: a dynamical perspective on habit formation and change. In: Human Decision-Making and Environmental Perception: Understanding and Assisting Human Decision-Making in Real Life Settings. Emerald Group Publishing (2003)
14.
Mahmassani, H., Liu, Y.: Dynamics of commuting decision behaviour under advanced traveller information systems. Transp. Res. Part C. 7(2–3), 91–107 (1999)CrossRef
15.
Di, X., Liu, H.X.: Boundedly rational route choice behaviour: A review of models and methodologies. Transp. Res. Part B. 85, 142–179 (2016)CrossRef
16.
Simon, H.A.: Rational choice and the structure of the environment. Psychol. Rev. 63, 129–138 (1956)CrossRef
17.
Wegener, D.T., Petty, R.E., Blankenship, K.L., Detweiler-Bedell, B.: Elaboration and numerical anchoring: implications of attitude theories for consumer judgment and decision making. J. Consumer Psychol. 20, 5–16 (2010)CrossRef
18.
Tversky, A., Kahneman, D.: Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science. 185, 1124–1131 (1974)CrossRef
19.
Epley, N., Gilovich, T.: Putting adjustment back into the anchoring and adjustment heuristic: differential processing of self-generated and experimenter-provided anchors. Psychol. Sci. 12, 391–396 (2001)CrossRef
20.
Englich, B., Mussweiler, T., Strack, F.: Playing dice with criminal sentences: the influence of irrelevant anchors on experts’ judicial decision making. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 32, 188–200 (2006)CrossRef
21.
Wegener, D.T., Petty, R.E., Detweiler-Bedell, B., Jarvis, W.B.G.: Implications of attitude change theories for numerical anchoring: anchor plausibility and the limits of anchor effectiveness. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 37, 62–69 (2001)CrossRef
22.
Englich, B., Soder, K.: Moody experts – how mood and expertise influence judgmental anchoring. Judgmental and Decision Making. 4, 41–50 (2009)
23.
Wilson, T.D., Houston, C.E., Etling, K.M., Brekke, N.: A new look at anchoring effects: basic anchoring and its antecedents. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 125, 387–402 (1996)CrossRef
24.
Eroglu, C., Croxton, K.L.: Biases in judgmental adjustments of statistical forecasts: the role of individual differences. Int. J. Forecast. 26, 116–133 (2010)CrossRef
25.
Blankenship, K.L., Wegener, D.T., Petty, R.E., Detweiler-Bedell, B., Macy, C.L.: Elaboration and consequences of anchored estimates: an attitudinal perspective on numerical anchoring. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 44, 1465–1476 (2008)CrossRef
26.
Chapman, G.B., Johnson, E.J.: The limits of anchoring. J. Behav. Decis. Mak. 7, 223–242 (1994)CrossRef
27.
28.
Dissanayake, D., Morikawa, T.: A combined RP / SP nested logit model of vehicle ownership, mode choice and trip chaining to investigate household travel behavior in developing countries. 82nd Annu.Meet. Transp. Res. Board. Transportation Research Board(2003)
29.
Sheeran, P.: Intention—behavior relations: a conceptual and empirical review. Eur. Rev. Soc. Psychol. 12(1), 1–36 (2002)CrossRef
30.
Carrington, M.J., Neville, B.A., Whitwell, G.J.: Lost in translation: Exploring the ethical consumer intention–behavior gap. J. Bus. Res. 67(1), 2759–2767 (2014)CrossRef
31.
Gabaix, X., Laibson, D., Moloche, G., Weinberg, S.: “The Allocation of Attention: Theory and Evidence,” Department of Economics Working Paper No. 03–31, MIT (2003)
32.
Hensher, D.A.: How do respondents process stated choice experiments? Attribute consideration under varying information load. J. Appl. Econom. 21(6), 861–878 (2006)MathSciNetCrossRef
33.
Cameron, T.A., DeShazo., J.A.: Differential Attention to Attributes in Utility-Theoretic Choice Models. J. Choice modelling. 3(3), 73–115 (2010)CrossRef
34.
Cameron, T., Ann, Englin, J.: Respondent experience and contingent valuation of environmental goods. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 33, 296–313 (1997)MATHCrossRef
35.
LaRiviere, J., Czajkowski, M., Hanley, N., Aanesen, M.: Jannike Falk-Petersen, and Dugald Tinch: The value of familiarity: Effects of knowledge and objective signals on willingness to pay for public goods. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 68, 376–389 (2014)CrossRef
36.
McFadden, D.: The New Science of Pleasure: Consumer Behavior and the Measurement of Well-Being. In Handbook of choice modelling, eds. Stephane Hess and Andew Daly, 7–48. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar (2014)
37.
Ryan, M., Watson, V., Entwistle, V.: Rationalising the ‘irrational’: A think aloud study of discrete choice experiment responses. Health Econ. 18(3), 321–336 (2009)CrossRef
38.
Scarpa, R., Zanoli, R., Bruschi, V., Naspetti, S.: Inferred and stated attribute non-attendance in food choice experiments. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 95(1), 165–180 (2013)CrossRef
39.
Lagarde, M.: Investigating attribute non-attendance and its consequences in choice experiments with latent class models. Health Econ. 22(5), 554–567 (2013)CrossRef
40.
Marti, M.W., Wissler, R.L.: Be careful what you ask for: the effects of anchors on personal injury damages awards. J. Experimental Psychology: Appl. 6, 91–103 (2000)
41.
Fujii, S., Garling, T.: Application of attitude theory for improved predictive accuracy of stated preference methods in travel demand analysis. Transp. Res. Part A. 37, 389–402 (2003)
42.
Molin, E.J.E., Timmermans, H.J.P., VonkNoordegraaf, D.M., Mol, F.: Competition Among Egress Transport Modes: A Stated Choice Model Incorporating Availability-Effects. Transportation Research Records, No. 21–28 (2006). (1972)
43.
44.
Furnham, A., Boo, H.C.: A literature review of the anchoring effect. J. Socio-Econ. 40, 35–42 (2011)CrossRef
45.
Strack, F., Mussweiler, T.: Explaining the enigmatic anchoring effect: mechanisms of selective accessibility. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 73, 437–446 (1997)CrossRef
46.
Joseph, M., Hilbe: Logistic Regression Models. CRC Press, Chapman & Hall/CRC, Taylor & Francis Group (2009)MATH
47.
Mussweiler, T., Strack, F.: Hypothesis-consistent testing and semantic priming in the anchoring paradigm: a selective accessibility model. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 35, 136–164 (1999)CrossRef
48.
Johnson, E.J., Schkade, D.A.: Bias in utility assessments: Further evidence and explanations. Manage. Sci. 35, 406–424 (1989)CrossRef
49.
Röseler, L., Schütz, A., Baumeister, R.F., Starker, U.: Does ego depletion reduce judgment adjustment for both internally and externally generated anchors? J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 87, 103942 (2020)CrossRef
50.
Vreeswijk, J., Thomas, T., Berkum, E.V., Arem, B.V.: Drivers’ Perception of Route Alternatives as Indicator for the Indifference Band. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2383, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 10–17 (2013)
51.
Jang, S., Rasouli, S., Timmermans, H.: Tolerance and Indifference Bands in Regret–Rejoice Choice Models: Extension to Market Segmentation in the Context of Mode Choice Behavior. Transp. Res. Rec J. Transp. Res. Board. 2672, 23–34 (2018)CrossRef
52.
Coombs, C.H., Dawes, R.M., Tversky, A.: Mathematical Psychology: An Elementary Introduction. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA (1970)MATH
Metadaten
Titel
Relevance Rule in Adding Up Non-Given Attributes in Travel Stated Choices: A Consideration Under Anchoring Perspective
verfasst von
Nguyen Hoang-Tung
Publikationsdatum
06.06.2022
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
International Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems Research / Ausgabe 2/2022
Print ISSN: 1348-8503
Elektronische ISSN: 1868-8659
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13177-022-00309-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2022

International Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems Research 2/2022 Zur Ausgabe

OriginalPaper

Highway Lane-Changing Prediction Using a Hierarchical Software Architecture based on Support Vector Machine and Continuous Hidden Markov Model

OriginalPaper

Capacity Analysis of Urban Arterial Midblock Sections Under Mixed Traffic Conditions

OriginalPaper

Effect of Acceleration and Deceleration Information of Preceding Vehicle Group on Fuel Economy of Following Vehicle in Starting

OriginalPaper

A GPS-based Algorithm for Brake and Turn Detection

OriginalPaper

Implementation of a Compact Traffic Signs Recognition System Using a New Squeezed YOLO

OriginalPaper

Modeling Analysis of Automated and Connected Cars in Signalized Intersections

Premium Partner

    Marktübersichten

    Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen. 

    Zur Marktübersicht
    Bildnachweise