nach oben

International Journal of Technology and Design Education

Erschienen in:

08.08.2022

The Effects of Implicit Belief of Intelligence on Metacognitive Skills and Project Design Engagement in an invention practice

verfasst von: Jon-Chao Hong, Jianjun Gu, Chi-Ruei Tsai

Erschienen in: International Journal of Technology and Design Education | Ausgabe 3/2023

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Drawing on Dweck and Leggett’s (1988) implicit beliefs of intelligence framework, the present study explored the incremental belief of intelligence (IBI) and how it correlated to metacognitive skills that reflected vocational students’ project design engagement. Data were collected from students from 2 vocational high schools involved in project design for a national invention exhibition. In all, 196 useful returns were subjected to confirmatory factor analysis with structural equation modeling. Study results indicated that there was a positive relationship between IBI and the three types of metacognitive skills: planning and thinking strategies, being aware and monitoring, and evaluating and revising. Moreover, planning and thinking strategies as well as being aware and monitoring were positively related to project design engagement, but no significant relationship could be found between evaluating and revising and project design engagement. Vocational school teachers may refer to this study to encourage their students to practice metacognitive skills in device design so as to reach a high level of behavioral engagement in finding and solving problems during the invention process.

Vorheriger Artikel Hands on programming: Teachers’ use of Metaphors in gesture and Speech make Abstract concepts tangible

Nächster Artikel Teachers’ cognitive beliefs about their assessment and use of tools when evaluating students’ learning of technological systems: a questionnaire study

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Alessandri, G., Borgogni, L., Latham, G. P., Cepale, G., Theodorou, A., & De Longis, E. (2020). Self-set goals improve academic performance through nonlinear effects on daily study performance. Learning and Individual Differences, 77, 101784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2019.101784CrossRef

Archambault, I., Pascal, S., Olivier, E., Dupéré, V., Janosz, M., Parent, S., & Pagani, L. S. (2022). Examining the contribution of student anxiety and opposition-defiance to the internal dynamics of affective. Cognitive and Behavioural Engagement in Math Learning and Instruction, 79, 101593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2022.101593CrossRef

Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 248–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90022-LCrossRef

Beckmann, N., Beckmann, J. F., Birney, D. P., & Wood, R. E. (2015). A problem shared is learning doubled: Deliberative processing in dyads improves learning in complex dynamic decision-making tasks. Computers in Human Behavior, 48, 654–662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.052CrossRef

Birney, D. P., & Sternberg, R. J. (2006). Intelligence and cognitive abilities as competencies in development. In E. Bialystok, & G. Craik (Eds.), Lifespan cognition: Mechanisms of change (pp. 315–330). Oxford University Press

Bryce, D., & Whitebread, D. (2012). The development of metacognitive skills: Evidence from observational analysis of young children’s behavior during problem-solving. Metacognition and Learning, 7(3), 197–217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-012-9091-2CrossRef

Chatzipantelia, A., Grammatikopoulos, V., & Gregoriadis, A. (2014). Development and evaluation of metacognition in early childhood education. Early Child Development and Care, 184(8), 1223–1232. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2013.861456CrossRef

Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. In G. A. Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern methods for business research (pp. 295–336). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates

Costa, A., & Faria, L. (2018). Implicit theories of intelligence and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review. Frontiers in psychology, 9, 829. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00829CrossRef

Craig, K., Hale, D., Grainger, C., & Stewart, M. E. (2020). Evaluating metacognitive self-reports: systematic reviews of the value of self-report in metacognitive research. Metacognition and Learning, 15(2), 155–213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-020-09222-yCrossRef

De Backer, L., Van Keer, H., & Valcke, M. (2021). Examining the relation between students’ active engagement in shared metacognitive regulation and individual learner characteristics. International Journal of Educational Research, 110, 101892. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2021.101892CrossRef

Desender, K., Van Opstal, F., Hughes, G., & Van den Bussche, E. (2016). The temporal dynamics of metacognition: Dissociating task-related activity from later metacognitive processes. Neuropsychologia, 82,54–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.01.003

Dinger, F. C., Dickhauser, O., Spinath, B., & Steinmayr, R. (2013). Antecedents and consequences of students’ achievement goals: A mediation analysis. Learning and Individual Differences, 28, 90–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2013.09.005CrossRef

Duchi, L., Lombardi, D., Paas, F., & Loyens, S. M. M. (2020). How a growth mindset can change the climate: The power of implicit beliefs in influencing people’s view and action. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 70, 101461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101461CrossRef

Dupeyrat, C., & Marine, C. (2005). Implicit theories of intelligence, goal orientation, cognitive engagement, and achievement: A test of Dweck’s model with returning to school adults. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30, 43–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2004.01.007CrossRef

Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95, 256–273. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.256CrossRef

Dweck, C. S., Mangels, J. A., & Good, C. (2008). Motivational effects on attention, cognition, and performance. In D. Y. Dai, & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Motivation, emotion, and cognition: Integrative perspectives on intellectual functioning and development (pp. 41–55). Lawrence Erlbaum

Fakhri Alamdari, E., & Bozorgian, H. (2022). Gender, metacognitive intervention, and dialogic interaction: EFL multimedia listening. System, 104, 102709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102709CrossRef

Flanigan, A. E., Peteranetz, M. S., Shell, D. F., & Soh, L. K. (2017). Implicit intelligence beliefs of computer science students: Exploring change across the semester. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 48, 179–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2016.10.003CrossRef

Folli, D., & Wolff, I. (2022). Biases in belief reports. Journal of Economic Psychology, 88, 102458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2021.102458CrossRef

Fornell, C. R., & Larcker, F. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800313CrossRef

Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059CrossRef

Gardner, A. K., Jabbour, I. J., Williams, B. H., & Huerta, S. (2016). Different goals, different pathways: The role of metacognition and task engagement in surgical skill acquisition. Journal of Surgical Education, 73(1), 61–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2015.08.007

Glerum, J., Loyens, S. M., & Rikers, R. M. (2020). Mind your mindset. An empirical study of mindset in secondary vocational education and training. Educational Studies, 46(3), 273–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2019.1573658CrossRef

Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Henseler, J. (2012). On the emancipation of PLS-SEM: A commentary on Rigdon. Long Range Planning, 47(3), 154–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2014.02.007CrossRef

Hancock, G. R., & Mueller, R. O. (Eds.). (2013). Structural equation modeling: A second course. Information Age Publishing

Hargrove, R. A., & Nietfeld, J. L. (2015). The impact of metacognitive instruction on creative problem solving. The Journal of Experimental Education, 83(3), 291–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2013.876604CrossRef

Hong, J. C., Tsai, C. R., Hsiao, H. S., Chen, P. H., Chu, K. C., Gu. J., & Sitthiworachart, J. (2019). The effect of the "Prediction-observation-quiz-explanation" inquiry-base e-learning model on flow experience in green energy learning. Computers & Education, 133, 127-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.01.009

James, B. T., Parrish, A. E., Guild, A. S., Creamer, C., Kelly, V., Perdue, B. … Beran, M. J. (2021). Go if you know: Preschool children’s movements reflect their metacognitive monitoring. Cognitive Development, 57, 101001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2020.101001CrossRef

James, B., Beattie, M., Shepherd, A., Armstrong, L., & Wilkinson, J. (2016). Time, fear and transformation: Student nurses’ experiences of doing a practicum (quality improvement project) in practice. Nurse Education in Practice, 19, 70–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2016.05.004CrossRef

Jang, H., Kim, E. J., & Reeve, J. (2016). Why students become more engaged or more disengaged during the semester: A self-determination theory dual-process model. Learning and Instruction, 43, 27–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.01.002CrossRef

Jia, X., Li, W., & Cao, L. (2019). The role of metacognitive components in creative thinking. Frontiers in psychology, 10, 2404. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02404CrossRef

Karwowski, M., Czerwonka, M., & Kaufman, J. C. (2020). Does intelligence strengthen creative metacognition? Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity and the Arts, 14, 353–360. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000208CrossRef

Kaufman, J. C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2013). In praise of Clark Kent: Creative metacognition and the importance of teaching kids when (Not) to be creative. Roeper Review, 35(3), 155–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2013.799413CrossRef

Kennett, D. J., & Keefer, K. (2006). Impact of learned resourcefulness and theories of intelligence on academic achievement of university students: An integrated approach. Educational Psychology, 26, 441–457. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410500342062CrossRef

Kim, S. L., & Kim, D. (2021). English learners’ science-literacy practice through explicit writing instruction in invention-based learning. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 2–2, 100029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2020.100029

Klemeš, J. J. (2013). Handbook of process integration. Elsevier

Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., & Patall, E. A. (2015). Motivation. In L. Corno, & E. M. Anderman (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 91–103). Routledge

Liu, S., & Liu, M. (2020). The impact of learner metacognition and goal orientation on problem-solving in a serious game environment. Computers in Human Behavior, 102, 151–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.08.021CrossRef

Lopez-Sola, E., Moreno-Bote, R., & Arsiwalla, X. D. (2021). Sense of agency for mental actions: Insights from a belief-based action-effect paradigm. Consciousness and Cognition, 96, 103225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2021.103225CrossRef

Matthes, B., & Stoeger, H. (2021). Do Implicit Theories About Ability Predict Self-Reports and Behavior-Proximal Measures of Primary School Students’ In-Class Cognitive and Metacognitive Learning Strategy Use? Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 2430. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.690271CrossRef

Menold, J., & Jablokow, K. (2019). Exploring the effects of cognitive style diversity and self-efficacy beliefs on final design attributes in student design teams. Design Studies, 60, 71–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2018.08.001CrossRef

Palmer, E. C., David, A. S., & Fleming, S. M. (2014). Effects of age on metacognitive efficiency. Consciousness and Cognition, 28, 151–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2014.06.007CrossRef

Popandopulo, A., Fominykh, N., & Kudysheva, A. (2021). Do educators need metacognitive skills in today’s educational environment? Thinking Skills and Creativity, 41, 100878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100878CrossRef

Preiss, D. D., Cosmelli, D., Grau, V., & Ortiz, D. (2016). Examining the influence of mind wandering and metacognition on creativity in university and vocational students. Learning and Individual Differences, 51, 417–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.07.010CrossRef

Promentilla, M. A. B., Lucas, R. I. G., Aviso, K. B., & Tan, R. R. (2017). Problem-based learning of process systems engineering and process integration concepts with metacognitive strategies: The case of P-graphs for polygeneration systems. Applied Thermal Engineering, 127, 1317–1325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.08.086CrossRef

Puente-Díaz, R., Cavazos-Arroyo, J., & Vargas-Barrera, F. (2021). Metacognitive feelings as a source of information in the evaluation and selection of creative ideas. Thinking skills and creativity, 39, 100767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100767CrossRef

Puente-Díaz, R., Cavazos-Arroyo, J., Puerta-Sierra, L., & Vargas-Barrera, F. (2022). The contribution Openness to Experience and its two aspects to the explanation of idea generation, evaluation and selection: A metacognitive perspective. Personality and Individual Differences, 185, 111240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.111240CrossRef

Robins, R. W., & Pals, J. L. (2002). Implicit self-theories in the academic domain: Implications for goal orientation, attributions, affect, and self-esteem change. Self and Identity, 1(4), 313–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298860290106805CrossRef

Roebers, C. M. (2017). Executive function and metacognition: Towards a unifying framework of cognitive self-regulation. Developmental Review, 45, 31–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2017.04.001CrossRef

Roebers, C. M., Mayer, B., Steiner, M., Bayard, N. S., & van Loon, M. H. (2019). The role of children’s metacognitive experiences for cue utilization and monitoring accuracy: A longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 55(10), 2077–2089. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000776CrossRef

Sannomiya, M., & Yamaguchi, Y. (2016). Creativity training in causal inference using the idea post-exposure paradigm: Effects on idea generation in junior high school students. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 22, 152–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2016.09.006CrossRef

Schneider, W. (2008). The development of metacognitive knowledge in children and adolescents: Major trends and implications for education. Mind Brain and Education, 2(3), 114–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-228X.2008.00041.xCrossRef

Seijts, G. H., Latham, G. P., Tasa, K., & Latham, B. W. (2004). Goal setting and goal orientation: an integration of two different yet related literatures. Academy of Management Journal, 47(2), 227–239. https://doi.org/10.5465/20159574CrossRef

Shernoff, D. J., Csikszentmihalyi, M., Shneider, B., & Shernoff, E. S. (2003). Student engagement in high school classrooms from the perspective of flow theory. School Psychology Quarterly, 18(2), 158–176. https://doi.org/10.1521/scpq.18.2.158.21860CrossRef

Sitzmann, T., & Ely, K. (2011). A meta-analysis of self-regulated learning in work-related training and educational attainment: What we know and where we need to go. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 421–442. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022777CrossRef

Tarbetsky, A. L., Collie, R. J., & Martin, A. J. (2016). The role of implicit theories of intelligence and ability in predicting achievement for Indigenous (Aboriginal) Australian students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 47, 61–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2016.01.002CrossRef

Tsai, Y. H., Lin, C. H., Hong, J. C., & Tai, K. H. (2018). The effect of metacognition on online learning interest and continuance to learn with MOOCs. Computers and Education, 121, 18-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.02.011

Ullman, J. B. (2001). Structural equation modeling. In B. G. Tabachnick, & L. S. Fidell (Eds.), Using multivariate statistics. Allyn & Bacon

Van Blankenstein, F. M., Saab, N., Van der Rijst, R. M., Danel, M. S., Bakker-van den Berg, A. S., & Van den Broek, P. W. (2019). How do self-efficacy beliefs for academic writing and collaboration and intrinsic motivation for academic writing and research develop during an undergraduate research project? Educational Studies, 45(2), 209–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2018.1446326CrossRef

Veenman, M. V. J. (2012). Assessing metacognitive skills in computerized learning environments. In R. Azevedo, & V. Aleven (Eds.), International handbook of metacognition and learning technologies. Springer

Willms, J. D. (2003). Ten hypotheses about socioeconomic gradients and community differences in children’s developmental outcomes. Human Resources Development Canada

Wright, A. C., Mueser, K. T., McGurk, S. R., Fowler, D., & Greenwood, K. E. (2020). Cognitive and metacognitive factors predict engagement in employment in individuals with first episode psychosis. Schizophrenia Research: Cognition, 19, 100141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scog.2019.100141CrossRef

Wright, A., Nelson, B., Fowler, D., & Greenwood, K. (2020). Perceptual biases and metacognition and their association with anomalous self-experiences in first episode psychosis. Consciousness and Cognition, 77, 102847. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2019.102847CrossRef

Yeager, D. S., Hanselman, P., Walton, G. M., Murray, J. S., Crosnoe, R., Muller, C. … Paunesku, D. (2019). A national experiment reveals where a growth mindset improves achievement. Nature, 573(7774), 364–369. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1466-yCrossRef

Zheng, J., Xing, W., Zhu, G., Chen, G., Zhao, H., & Xie, C. (2020). Profiling self-regulation behaviors in STEM learning of engineering design. Computers and Education, 143, 103669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103669CrossRef

Zimmerman, B. J. (2008). Investigating self-regulation and motivation: Historical background, methodological developments, and future prospects. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 166–183. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831207312909CrossRef

Titel: The Effects of Implicit Belief of Intelligence on Metacognitive Skills and Project Design Engagement in an invention practice
verfasst von: Jon-Chao Hong
Jianjun Gu
Chi-Ruei Tsai
Publikationsdatum: 08.08.2022
Verlag: Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in: International Journal of Technology and Design Education / Ausgabe 3/2023
Print ISSN: 0957-7572
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-1804
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-022-09761-2

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2023

Pedagogical approaches for eliciting students’ design thinking strategies: tell-and-practice vs. contrasting cases

Bringing computational thinking to technology education classrooms: Hacking car activity for middle schools in the republic of korea

Supporting traditional handicrafts teaching through eye movement technology

Correlates between imagination types and abilities in designing works

Designing Maker initiatives for educational inclusion

‘Bush kinders’: developing early years learners technology and engineering understandings

Premium Partner