Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Educational Research for Policy and Practice 2/2020

09.10.2019 | Original Article

Developing a persuasive writing model for secondary school

verfasst von: Farous Izwan Bin Abdul Aziz, Seriaznita Bte Mat Said

Erschienen in: Educational Research for Policy and Practice | Ausgabe 2/2020

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Persuasive writing is one of the main writing genres secondary students are required to master. However, while the students can naturally argue verbally and in an informal setting, they lack the skill to compose a persuasive argument for academic purposes. The main problem is that students can barely construct an argument while composing a persuasive essay. The objectives of this study are to verify the effectiveness of the secondary students’ arguments according to Toulmin’s Model. A sample size of 150 students from three different secondary schools in the Klang area was chosen for this study. The students were instructed to write an essay according to a set of essay prompts provided by the researcher. The Toulmin’s Model was employed as the main tool to analyze the essays to tag and label the persuasive elements that were used by the students while writing the essays. The findings reveal that the students are mostly able to apply the basic persuasive elements (grounds, claims and warrant) but do not take full advantage of the optional elements (qualifier, rebuttal and backing). It is concluded that new strategies and a new model need to be proposed to help train the students to improve their persuasive writing skills.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Allagui, B. (2019). Investigating the quality of argument structure in first-year university writing. In S. Hidri & S. Hidri (Eds.), English language teaching research in the middle East and North Africa (pp. 173–196). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef Allagui, B. (2019). Investigating the quality of argument structure in first-year university writing. In S. Hidri & S. Hidri (Eds.), English language teaching research in the middle East and North Africa (pp. 173–196). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Azar, M. (1999). Argumentative text as rhetorical structure: An application of rhetorical structure theory. Argumentation,13(117), 97–114.CrossRef Azar, M. (1999). Argumentative text as rhetorical structure: An application of rhetorical structure theory. Argumentation,13(117), 97–114.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Aziz, F. I. A., & Ahmad, U. K. (2017). Persuasive writing: How students argue. Sains Humanika, 9(4–2), 19–32. Aziz, F. I. A., & Ahmad, U. K. (2017). Persuasive writing: How students argue. Sains Humanika, 9(4–2), 19–32.
Zurück zum Zitat Black, K. (1989). Audience analysis and persuasive writing at the college level. Research in the Teaching of English,23(3), 231–253. Black, K. (1989). Audience analysis and persuasive writing at the college level. Research in the Teaching of English,23(3), 231–253.
Zurück zum Zitat Connor, U. (1990). Linguistic/rhetorical measures for international persuasive student writing. Research in the Teaching of English,24(1), 67–87. Connor, U. (1990). Linguistic/rhetorical measures for international persuasive student writing. Research in the Teaching of English,24(1), 67–87.
Zurück zum Zitat Díaz-Hormazabal, R. (2007). Argumentative writing strategies and perceptions of writing in academia by EFL college students. Literatura Y Lingüística,18, 253–282. Díaz-Hormazabal, R. (2007). Argumentative writing strategies and perceptions of writing in academia by EFL college students. Literatura Y Lingüística,18, 253–282.
Zurück zum Zitat Durst, R., Laine, C., Schultz, L. M., & Vilter, W. (1990). Appealing texts the persuasive writing of high school students. Written Communication,7(2), 232–255.CrossRef Durst, R., Laine, C., Schultz, L. M., & Vilter, W. (1990). Appealing texts the persuasive writing of high school students. Written Communication,7(2), 232–255.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat El-daly, H. M. (2011). Linguistic aspects of the narrative and persuasive written productions of Arabic and Spanish speakers: Focus on the role of explicit knowledge of grammar. Arab World English Journal,2(1), 77–122. El-daly, H. M. (2011). Linguistic aspects of the narrative and persuasive written productions of Arabic and Spanish speakers: Focus on the role of explicit knowledge of grammar. Arab World English Journal,2(1), 77–122.
Zurück zum Zitat Ellis, L. M. (2015). A critique of the ubiquity of the Toulmin model in argumentative writing instruction in the USA. In F. H. van Eemeren & B. Garssen (Eds.), Scrutinizing argumentation in practice (pp. 201–213). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.CrossRef Ellis, L. M. (2015). A critique of the ubiquity of the Toulmin model in argumentative writing instruction in the USA. In F. H. van Eemeren & B. Garssen (Eds.), Scrutinizing argumentation in practice (pp. 201–213). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Erduran, S. (2008). Argumentation in science education. Dordrecht: Springer. Erduran, S. (2008). Argumentation in science education. Dordrecht: Springer.
Zurück zum Zitat Fei-Wen, C. (2010). A socio-cognitive modeling approach to teaching english argumentation. Asian ESP Journal,6(1), 120–146. Fei-Wen, C. (2010). A socio-cognitive modeling approach to teaching english argumentation. Asian ESP Journal,6(1), 120–146.
Zurück zum Zitat Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2007). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for adolescent students. Journal of Educational Psychology,99(3), 445–476.CrossRef Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2007). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for adolescent students. Journal of Educational Psychology,99(3), 445–476.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hitchcock, D. (2017). Good reasoning on the Toulmin model. In D. Hitchcock (Ed.), On reasoning and argument (pp. 371–387). Berlin: Springer.CrossRef Hitchcock, D. (2017). Good reasoning on the Toulmin model. In D. Hitchcock (Ed.), On reasoning and argument (pp. 371–387). Berlin: Springer.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Johnson, T. S., Thompson, L., Smagorinsky, P., & Fry, P. G. (2003). To teach the five-paragraph theme learning. Research in the Teaching of English,38(2), 136–176. Johnson, T. S., Thompson, L., Smagorinsky, P., & Fry, P. G. (2003). To teach the five-paragraph theme learning. Research in the Teaching of English,38(2), 136–176.
Zurück zum Zitat Juzwik, M. M., VanDerHeide, J., Dunn, M. B., & Goff, B. (2018). Assigning and framing argument writing to foreground significance: Comparing three approaches in secondary English. English in Education,52(3), 186–199.CrossRef Juzwik, M. M., VanDerHeide, J., Dunn, M. B., & Goff, B. (2018). Assigning and framing argument writing to foreground significance: Comparing three approaches in secondary English. English in Education,52(3), 186–199.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kaewpet, C. (2018). Quality of argumentation models. Theory and Practice in Language Studies,8(9), 1105–1113.CrossRef Kaewpet, C. (2018). Quality of argumentation models. Theory and Practice in Language Studies,8(9), 1105–1113.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Karbach, J. (1987). Using Toulmin’s Model of argumentation. Journal of Teaching Writing,6(1), 81–91. Karbach, J. (1987). Using Toulmin’s Model of argumentation. Journal of Teaching Writing,6(1), 81–91.
Zurück zum Zitat Lam, Y. W., Hew, K. F., & Chiu, K. F. (2018). Improving argumentative writing: Effects of a blended learning approach and gamification. Language Learning and Technology, 22(1), 97–118. Lam, Y. W., Hew, K. F., & Chiu, K. F. (2018). Improving argumentative writing: Effects of a blended learning approach and gamification. Language Learning and Technology, 22(1), 97–118.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee, G. I. (2017). Stance and stance-support strategies in English argumentative writing by malaysian undergraduate writers. Seri Kembangan: Universiti Putra Malaysia. Lee, G. I. (2017). Stance and stance-support strategies in English argumentative writing by malaysian undergraduate writers. Seri Kembangan: Universiti Putra Malaysia.
Zurück zum Zitat Lunsford, K. J. (2002). Contextualizing Toulmin’s Model in the writing classroom: A case study. Written,19, 109–174.CrossRef Lunsford, K. J. (2002). Contextualizing Toulmin’s Model in the writing classroom: A case study. Written,19, 109–174.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Nimehchisalem, V. (2018). Pyramid of argumentation: Towards an integrated model for teaching and assessing esl writing. Language & Communication,5(2), 185–200. Nimehchisalem, V. (2018). Pyramid of argumentation: Towards an integrated model for teaching and assessing esl writing. Language & Communication,5(2), 185–200.
Zurück zum Zitat Nimehchisalem, V., & Mukundan, J. (2011). Determining the evaluative criteria of an argumentative writing scale. English Language Teaching,4(1), 58–70.CrossRef Nimehchisalem, V., & Mukundan, J. (2011). Determining the evaluative criteria of an argumentative writing scale. English Language Teaching,4(1), 58–70.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Qin, J., & Karabacak, E. (2010). The analysis of Toulmin elements in Chinese EFL university argumentative writing. System,38(3), 444–456.CrossRef Qin, J., & Karabacak, E. (2010). The analysis of Toulmin elements in Chinese EFL university argumentative writing. System,38(3), 444–456.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rashid, S., & Chan, S. H. (2017). Exploring the interplay of mode of discourse and proficiency level in ESL writing performance: Implications for testing (pp. 105–122). XXXVII: The English Teacher. Rashid, S., & Chan, S. H. (2017). Exploring the interplay of mode of discourse and proficiency level in ESL writing performance: Implications for testing (pp. 105–122). XXXVII: The English Teacher.
Zurück zum Zitat Simon, S., Erduran, S., & Osborne, J. (2006). Learning to teach argumentation: Research and development in the science classroom. International Journal of Science Education,28(2–3), 235–260.CrossRef Simon, S., Erduran, S., & Osborne, J. (2006). Learning to teach argumentation: Research and development in the science classroom. International Journal of Science Education,28(2–3), 235–260.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Suhartoyo, E., Mukminatien, N., & Laksmi, E. D. (2015). The effect of Toulmin’s Model of argumentation within TWPS strategy on students’ critical thinking on argumentative essay. Jurnal Pendidikan Humaniora,3(2), 143–153. Suhartoyo, E., Mukminatien, N., & Laksmi, E. D. (2015). The effect of Toulmin’s Model of argumentation within TWPS strategy on students’ critical thinking on argumentative essay. Jurnal Pendidikan Humaniora,3(2), 143–153.
Zurück zum Zitat Tan, K. E. (2006). Writing English essays within dominant discourses in Malaysian schools. Malaysian Journal of Educators and Education,21(November 2005), 23–45. Tan, K. E. (2006). Writing English essays within dominant discourses in Malaysian schools. Malaysian Journal of Educators and Education,21(November 2005), 23–45.
Zurück zum Zitat Toulmin, S. (2003). The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Toulmin, S. (2003). The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Varghese, S. A., & Abraham, S. A. (1998). Undergraduate arguing a case. Journal of Second Language Writing, 7(3), 287–306.CrossRef Varghese, S. A., & Abraham, S. A. (1998). Undergraduate arguing a case. Journal of Second Language Writing, 7(3), 287–306.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Vasu, K., Nimehchisalem, V., Fung, Y. M., & Rashid, S. M. (2018). The usefulness and effectiveness of argumentative writing self-assessment checklist in undergraduate writing classrooms. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences,8(4), 202–219.CrossRef Vasu, K., Nimehchisalem, V., Fung, Y. M., & Rashid, S. M. (2018). The usefulness and effectiveness of argumentative writing self-assessment checklist in undergraduate writing classrooms. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences,8(4), 202–219.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Yunus, M., & Chien, C. H. (2016). The use of mind mapping strategy in Malaysian University English Test (MUET) writing. Creative Education,7, 619–626.CrossRef Yunus, M., & Chien, C. H. (2016). The use of mind mapping strategy in Malaysian University English Test (MUET) writing. Creative Education,7, 619–626.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Zainuddin, S. Z., & Rafik-Galea, S. (2016). Effects of training in the use of Toulmin’s Model on ESL students’ argumentative writing and critical thinking ability. Malaysian Journal of Languages and Linguistics (MJLL),5(2), 114–133.CrossRef Zainuddin, S. Z., & Rafik-Galea, S. (2016). Effects of training in the use of Toulmin’s Model on ESL students’ argumentative writing and critical thinking ability. Malaysian Journal of Languages and Linguistics (MJLL),5(2), 114–133.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Developing a persuasive writing model for secondary school
verfasst von
Farous Izwan Bin Abdul Aziz
Seriaznita Bte Mat Said
Publikationsdatum
09.10.2019
Verlag
Springer Singapore
Erschienen in
Educational Research for Policy and Practice / Ausgabe 2/2020
Print ISSN: 1570-2081
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-1723
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10671-019-09253-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2020

Educational Research for Policy and Practice 2/2020 Zur Ausgabe