Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
MTZ-Fachkongress

Antriebe und Energiesysteme von morgen


Austausch von Automobil- und Energiewirtschaft

Am 14./15. Mai geht es in Chemnitz um die Mobilitätswende durch Elektro- und Wasserstofffahrzeuge.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Journal of Business Ethics
Erschienen in: Journal of Business Ethics 4/2019

17.11.2016 | Original Paper

Piggy in the Middle: How Direct Customer Power Affects First-Tier Suppliers’ Adoption of Socially Responsible Procurement Practices and Performance

verfasst von: Donna Marshall, Lucy McCarthy, Marius Claudy, Paul McGrath

Erschienen in: Journal of Business Ethics | Ausgabe 4/2019

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Companies are faced with a choice of which type of power to use in their efforts to persuade their first-tier suppliers to adopt socially responsible procurement practices with key second-tier suppliers. However, we know little about how first-tier suppliers will react to different types of power and which are most effective in encouraging the adoption of socially responsible procurement practices. We are also ignorant of the impact of these practices on first-tier suppliers’ performance. This paper uses bases of power theory to examine the impact of buyer companies’ power usage (non-mediated and mediated) on first-tier suppliers’ adoption of socially responsible procurement practices (process-based and market-based) with their own (second-tier) suppliers. We surveyed managers responsible for sustainable supply chain management in 156 firms and analyzed the results using structural equation modeling. Our findings show that non-mediated power use (expert and referent) influences the adoption of process-based and market-based practices, while mediated power use (coercion, legitimacy, and reward) has no significant impact on the adoption of either type of practice. Additionally, we find that the adoption of market-based socially responsible procurement practices leads to enhanced performance for first-tier suppliers who adopt these practices with their second-tier suppliers.
Vorheriger Artikel New Evidence on the Role of the Media in Corporate Social Responsibility
Nächster Artikel Exploring Muslim Attitudes Towards Corporate Social Responsibility: Are Saudi Business Students Different?

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
Abdallah, T., Diabat, A., & Simchi-Levi, D. (2012). Sustainable supply chain design: A closed-loop formulation and sensitivity analysis. Production Planning and Control: The Management of Operations, 23(2–3), 120–133.CrossRef
Ağan, Y., Kuzey, C., Acar, M. F., & Açıkgöz, A. (2016). The relationships between corporate social responsibility, environmental supplier development, and firm performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112(3), 1872–1881.CrossRef
Akamp, M., & Muller, M. (2013). Supplier management in developing countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 56(1), 54–62.CrossRef
Amaeshi, K. M., Osuji, O. K., & Nnodim, P. (2008). Corporate social responsibility in supply chains of global brands: A boundaryless responsibility? Journal of Business Ethics, 81(1), 223–234.CrossRef
Amann, M., Roehrich, J., Eßig, M., & Harland, C. (2014). Driving sustainable supply chain management in the public sector: The importance of public procurement in the European Union. Supply Chain Management, 19(3), 351–366.CrossRef
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411–423.CrossRef
Armstrong, S. J., & Overton, T. S. (1977). Estimating non-response bias in mail surveys. Journal of Advanced Research, 14(3), 396–402.
Ashby, A., Leat, M., & Hudson-Smith, M. (2012). Making connections: A review of supply chain management and sustainability literature. Supply Chain Management, 17(5), 497–516.CrossRef
Awaysheh, A., & Klassen, R. D. (2010). The impact of supply chain structure on the use of supplier socially responsible practices. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 30(12), 1246–1268.CrossRef
Ayuso, S., Roca, M., & Colomé, R. (2013). SMEs as “transmitters” of CSR requirements in the supply chain. Supply Chain Management, 18(5), 497–508.CrossRef
Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74–94.CrossRef
Belaya, V., Gagalyuk, T., & Hanf, J. (2009). Measuring asymmetrical power distribution in supply chain networks: What is the appropriate method? Journal of Relationship Marketing, 8(2), 165–193.CrossRef
Benton, W. C., & Maloni, M. (2005). The influence of power driven buyer/supplier relationships on supply chain satisfaction. Journal of Operations Management, 23(1), 1–22.CrossRef
Bitzer, V., Glasbergen, P., & Leroy, P. (2012). Partnerships of a feather flock together? An analysis of the emergence of networks of partnerships in the global cocoa sector. Global Networks, 12(3), 355–374.CrossRef
Bondy, K. (2008). The paradox of power in CSR: A case study on implementation. Journal of Business Ethics, 82, 307–323.CrossRef
Boyd, D. E., Spekman, R. E., Kamauff, J. W., & Werhane, P. (2007). Corporate social responsibility in global supply chains: A procedural justice perspective. Long Range Planning, 40(3), 341–356.CrossRef
Brandlogic and CRD Analytics. (2012). Sustainability leadership report: Measuring perception vs. reality for 100 prominent global brands. Brandlogic Corp. and CRD Analytics.
Burchielli, R., Delaney, A., Tate, J., & Coventry, K. (2009). The FairWear campaign: An ethical network in the Australian garment industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 90(4), 575–588.CrossRef
Cao, M., & Zhang, Q. (2011). Supply chain collaboration: Impact on collaborative advantage and firm performance. Journal of Operations Management, 29(3), 163–180.CrossRef
Carter, C. R. (2000). Ethical issues in international buyer–supplier relationships: A dyadic examination. Journal of Operations Management, 18(2), 191–208.CrossRef
Carter, C. R., & Easton, P. L. (2011). Sustainable supply chain management: Evolution and future directions. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 41(1), 46–62.CrossRef
Carter, C. R., & Rogers, D. S. (2008). A framework of sustainable supply chain management: Moving toward new theory. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 38(5), 360–387.CrossRef
Chavez, R., Fynes, B., Gimenez, C., & Wiengarten, F. (2012). Assessing the effect of industry clockspeed on the supply chain management practice–performance relationship. Supply Chain Management, 17(3), 235–248.CrossRef
Chen, F. F., Sousa, K. H., & West, S. G. (2005). Teacher’s corner: Testing measurement invariance of second-order factor models. Structural Equation Modelling, 12(3), 471–492.CrossRef
Ciliberti, F., de Groot, G., de Haan, J., & Pontrandolfo, P. (2009). Codes to coordinate supply chains: SMEs’ experiences with SA8000. Supply Chain Management, 14(2), 117–127.CrossRef
Ciliberti, F., Pontrandolfo, P., & Scozzi, B. (2008). Investigating corporate social responsibility in supply chains: A SME perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(15), 1579–1588.CrossRef
Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334.CrossRef
Cycyota, C. S., & Harrison, D. A. (2006). What (not) to expect when surveying executives: A meta-analysis of top manager response rates and techniques over time. Organizational Research Methods, 9(2), 133–160.CrossRef
de Brito, M. P., Carbone, V., & Blanquart, C. M. (2008). Towards a sustainable fashion retail supply chain in Europe: Organisation and performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 114(2), 534–553.CrossRef
Doorey, D. J. (2011). The transparent supply chain: From resistance to implementation at Nike and Levi-Strauss. Journal of Business Ethics, 103(4), 587–603.CrossRef
Ehrgott, M., Reimann, F., Kaufmann, L., & Carter, C. R. (2011). Social sustainability in selecting emerging economy suppliers. Journal of Business Ethics, 98(1), 99–119.CrossRef
Eriksson, D., & Göran, S. (2016). The process of responsibility, decoupling point, and disengagement of moral and social responsibility in supply chains: Empirical findings and prescriptive thoughts. Journal of Business Ethics, 134(2), 281–298.CrossRef
Ethical Corporation. (2016). Patagonia circular economy strategy: A case study. Ethical Corporation.
Fishman, C. (2006). The Wal-Mart effect and a decent society: Who knew shopping was so important? Academy of Management Perspectives, 20(3), 6–25.CrossRef
Foerstl, K., Reuter, C., Hartmann, E., & Blome, C. (2010). Managing supplier sustainability risks in a dynamically changing environment: Sustainable supplier management in the chemical industry. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 16(2), 118–130.CrossRef
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Advanced Research, 18(1), 39–50.
Forza, C. (2002). Survey research in operations management: A process-based perspective. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 22(2), 152–194.CrossRef
Fraj-Andrés, E., Martínez-Salinas, E., & Matute-Vallejo, J. (2009). Factors affecting corporate environmental strategy in Spanish industrial firms. Business Strategy and the Environment, 18(8), 500–514.CrossRef
Frazier, G. L., & Rody, R. C. (1991). The use of influence strategies in interfirm relationships in industrial product channels. Journal of Marketing, 55(1), 52–69.CrossRef
Frazier, G. L., & Summers, J. O. (1986). Perceptions of inter-firm power and its use within a franchise channel. Journal of Marketing Research, 23(5), 169–176.CrossRef
French, J. R., & Raven, B. (1959). The bases of social power. In C. Dorwin (Ed.), Studies in social power (pp. 150–167). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Friedman, M. (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times Magazine. Retrieved September 15.
Gaski, J. (1984). The theory of power and conflict in channels of distribution. Journal of Marketing, 48(3), 9–29.CrossRef
Giunipero, L. C., Hooker, R. E., & Denslow, D. (2012). Purchasing and supply management sustainability: Drivers and barriers. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 18(4), 258–269.CrossRef
Godfrey, P. C., Merrill, C. B., & Hansen, J. M. (2009). The relationship between corporate social responsibility and shareholder value: An empirical test of the risk management hypothesis. Strategic Management Journal, 30(4), 425–445.CrossRef
Grekova, K., Calantone, R. J., Bremmers, H. J., Trienekens, J. H., & Omta, S. W. F. (2016). How environmental collaboration with suppliers and customers influences firm performance: Evidence from Dutch food and beverage processors. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112(3), 1861–1871.CrossRef
Grienberger, I., Rutte, C., & van Knippenberg, A. (1997). Influence of social comparisons of outcomes and procedures on fairness judgments. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(6), 913–919.CrossRef
Griffith, D. A., Harvey, M. G., & Lusch, R. F. (2006). Social exchange in supply chain relationships: The resulting benefits of procedural and distributive justice. Journal of Operations Management, 24(2), 85–98.CrossRef
Hallen, L., Johanson, J., & Seyed-Mohamed, N. (1991). Interfirm adaptations in business relationships. Journal of Marketing, 55(2), 29–37.CrossRef
Heinz, D. C. (1976). Financial correlates of a social measure. Akron Business and Economic Review, 7(1), 48–51.
Hickson, D. J., Hinings, C. R., Lee, C. A., Schneck, R. E., & Pennings, J. M. (1971). A strategic contingency theory of intraorganizational power. Administrative Science Quarterly, 16(2), 216–229.CrossRef
Hoffjan, A. L., Luhrs, S., & Kolburg, A. (2011). Cost transparency in supply chains: Demystification of the cooperation tenet. Schmalenbach Business Review, 63(3), 230–251.CrossRef
Hollos, D., Blome, C., & Foerstl, K. (2012). Does sustainable supplier co-operation affect performance? Examining implications for the triple bottom line. International Journal of Production Research, 50(11), 2968–2986.CrossRef
Hughes, A., Buttle, M., & Wrigley, N. (2007). Organisational geographies of corporate responsibility: A UK–US comparison of retailers’ ethical trading initiatives. Journal of Economic Geography, 7(4), 491–513.CrossRef
Huq, F. A., Stevenson, M., & Zorzini, M. (2014). Social sustainability in developing country suppliers. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 34(5), 610–638.CrossRef
Jiang, B. (2009). Implementing supplier codes of conduct in global supply chains: Process explanations from theoretic and empirical perspectives. Journal of Business Ethics, 85(1), 77–92.CrossRef
Jones, I. W., & Pollitt, M. G. (1998). Ethical and unethical competition: Establishing the rules of engagement. Long Range Planning, 31(5), 703–710.CrossRef
Karjalainen, K., & Moxham, C. (2013). Focus on Fairtrade: Propositions for integrating Fairtrade and supply chain management research. Journal of Business Ethics, 116(2), 267–282.CrossRef
Klassen, R. D., & Vereecke, A. (2012). Social issues in supply chains: Capabilities link responsibility, risk (opportunity), and performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 40(1), 103–115.CrossRef
Kozlowski, A., Searcy, C., & Bardecki, M. (2015). Corporate sustainability reporting in the apparel industry. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 64(3), 377–397.CrossRef
Kumar, N., Scheer, L. K., Benedict, J., & Steenkamp, E. M. (1995). The effects of perceived interdependence on dealer attitudes. Journal of Marketing Research, 32(3), 348–356.CrossRef
Laari, S., Töyli, J., Solakivi, T., & Ojala, L. (2016). Firm performance and customer-driven green supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 1960–1970.CrossRef
Lamming, R., Caldwell, N., Phillips, W., & Harrison, D. (2005). Sharing sensitive information in supply relationships: The flaws in one-way open-book negotiation and the need for transparency. European Management Journal, 23(5), 554–563.CrossRef
Lee, K. H., & Kim, J. W. (2009). Current status of CSR in the realm of supply management: The case of the Korean electronics industry. Supply Chain Management, 14(2), 138–148.CrossRef
Leire, C., & Mont, O. (2010). The implementation of socially responsible purchasing. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 17(1), 27–39.
Lemeilleur, S., N’Dao, Y., & Ruf, F. (2015). The productivist rationality behind a sustainable certification process: Evidence from the Rainforest Alliance in the Ivorian cocoa sector. International Journal of Sustainable Development, 18(4), 310–328.CrossRef
Liang, H., Saraf, N., Hu, Q., & Xue, Y. (2007). Assimilation of enterprise systems: The effect of institutional pressures and the mediating role of top management. MIS Quarterly, 31(1), 59–87.CrossRef
Liu, Y., Luo, Y. D., & Liu, T. (2009). Governing buyer–supplier relationships through transactional and relational mechanisms: Evidence from China. Journal of Operations Management, 27(4), 294–309.CrossRef
MacCarthy, B. L., & Jayarathne, P. G. S. A. (2012). Sustainable collaborative supply networks in the international clothing industry: A comparative analysis of two retailers. Production Planning and Control: The Management of Operations, 23(4), 252–268.CrossRef
Maignan, I., Hillebrand, B., & McAlister, D. (2002). Managing socially responsible buying: How to integrate non-economic criteria into the purchasing process. European Management Journal, 20(6), 641–648.CrossRef
Maloni, M., & Benton, W. C. (2000). Power influences in the supply chain. Journal of Business Logistics, 21(1), 49–73.
Marshall, D., McCarthy, L., Heavey, C., & McGrath, P. (2015a). Environmental and social supply chain management sustainability practices: Construct development and measurement. Production Planning & Control, 26(8), 673–690.CrossRef
Marshall, D., McCarthy, L., McGrath, P., & Claudy, M. (2015b). Going above and beyond: How sustainability culture and entrepreneurial orientation drive social sustainability supply chain practice adoption. Supply Chain Management, 20(4), 434–454.CrossRef
Marshall, D., McCarthy, L., McGrath, P., & Harrigan, F. (2016). What’s your strategy for supply chain disclosure? Sloan Management Review, 57(2), 37–45.
Matthews, L., Power, D., Touboulic, A., & Marques, L. (2016). Building bridges: Toward alternative theory of sustainable supply chain management. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 52(1), 82–94.CrossRef
Miemczyk, J., Johnsen, T. E., & Macquet, M. (2012). Sustainable purchasing and supply management: A structured literature review of definitions and measures at the dyad, chain and network levels. Supply Chain Management, 17(5), 478–496.CrossRef
Miller, J. G., & Roth, A. V. (1994). A taxonomy of manufacturing strategies. Management Science, 40(3), 285–304.CrossRef
Mol, A. P. J. (2015). Transparency and value chain sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 107, 154–161.CrossRef
Mueller, M., Gomes dos Santos, V., & Seuring, S. (2009). The contribution of environmental and social standards towards ensuring legitimacy in supply chain governance. Journal of Business Ethics, 89(4), 509–523.CrossRef
Nahm, A. Y., Vonderembse, M. A., & Koufteros, X. A. (2004). The impact of organizational culture on time-based manufacturing and performance. Decision Sciences, 35(4), 579–607.CrossRef
Nidumolu, R., Prahalad, C. K., & Rangaswami, M. R. (2009). Why sustainability is now the key driver of innovation. Harvard Business Review, 87(9), 56–64.
Nyaga, G. N., Lynch, D. F., Marshall, D., & Ambrose, E. (2013). Power asymmetry, adaptation and collaboration in dyadic relationships involving a powerful partner. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 49(3), 42–65.CrossRef
Pagell, M., & Gobeli, D. (2009). Plant managers’ experiences and attitudes toward sustainability production and operations management. Production and Operations Management Society, 18(3), 278–299.CrossRef
Pagell, M., & Shevchenko, A. (2014). Why research in sustainable supply chain management should have no future. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 50(1), 44–55.CrossRef
Pagell, M., & Wu, Z. (2009). Building a more complete theory of sustainable supply chain management using case studies of ten exemplars. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 4(2), 37–56.CrossRef
Pagell, M., Wu, Z., & Wasserman, M. E. (2010). Thinking differently about purchasing portfolios: An assessment of sustainable sourcing. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 46(1), 57–73.CrossRef
Parket, R., & Eilbirt, H. (1975). Social responsibility: The underlying factors. Business Horizons, 18(4), 5–10.CrossRef
Park-Poaps, H., & Rees, K. (2010). Stakeholder forces of socially responsible supply chain management orientation. Journal of Business Ethics, 92(2), 305–322.CrossRef
Pedersen, E. R. (2009). The many and the few: Rounding up the SMEs that manage CSR in the supply chain. Supply Chain Management, 14(2), 109–116.CrossRef
Perrini, F., Russo, A., & Tencati, A. (2007). CSR strategies of SMEs and large firms: Evidence from Italy. Journal of Business Ethics, 74(3), 285–300.CrossRef
Perry, P., & Towers, N. (2013). Conceptual framework development: CSR implementation in fashion supply chains. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 43(5), 478–501.CrossRef
Pfeffer, J. (2010). Building sustainable organizations: The human factor. Academy of Management Perspectives, 24(1), 34–45.
Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1974). Organizational decision making as a political process: The case of a university budget. Administrative Science Quarterly, 19(2), 135–151.CrossRef
Phillips, L. W. (1981). Assessing measurement error in key informant reports: A methodological note on organizational analysis in marketing. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(4), 395–415.CrossRef
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.CrossRef
Porteous, A. H., Rammohan, S. V., & Lee, H. L. (2015). Carrots or sticks? Improving social and environmental compliance at suppliers through incentives and penalties. Production and Operations Management, 24(9), 1402–1413.
Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 78–92.
Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). The big idea: Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review, 89(1/2), 63–77.
Pullman, M. E., Maloni, M. J., & Carter, R. C. (2009). Food for thought: Social versus environmental sustainability practices and performance outcomes. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 45(4), 38–54.CrossRef
Reuter, C., Foerstl, K., Hartmann, E., & Blome, C. (2010). Sustainable global supplier management: The role of dynamic capabilities in achieving competitive advantage. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 46(2), 45–63.CrossRef
Ruane, F., & Gorg, H. (1997). The impact of foreign direct investment on sectoral adjustment in the Irish economy. National Institute Economic Review, 160(1), 76–86.CrossRef
Salancik, G. R., & Pfeffer, J. (1977). Who gets power and how they hold on to it: A strategic-contingency model of power. Organizational Dynamics, 5(3), 3–21.CrossRef
Sancha, C., Gimenez, C., & Sierra, V. (2016a). Achieving a socially responsible supply chain through assessment and collaboration. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112(3), 1934–1947.CrossRef
Sancha, C., Wong, C. W. Y., & Gimenez Thomsen, C. (2016b). Buyer–supplier relationships on environmental issues: A contingency perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112(3), 1849–1860.CrossRef
Sarkis, J., Gonzalez-Torre, P., & Adenso-Diaz, B. (2010). Stakeholder pressure and the adoption of environmental practices: The mediating effect of training. Journal of Operations Management, 28(2), 163–176.CrossRef
Strand, R. (2009). Corporate responsibility in Scandinavian supply chains. Journal of Business Ethics, 85(1), 179–185.CrossRef
Tate, W. L., Ellram, L. M., & Gölgeci, I. (2013). Diffusion of environmental business practices: A network approach. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 19(4), 264–275.CrossRef
Thomas, T. E., & Lamm, E. (2012). Legitimacy and organizational sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics, 110(2), 191–203.CrossRef
Touboulic, A., Chicksand, D., & Walker, H. (2014). Managing imbalanced supply chain relationships for sustainability: A power perspective. Decision Sciences, 45(4), 577–619.CrossRef
Van Der Ploeg, L., & Vanclay, F. (2013). Credible claim or corporate spin? A checklist to evaluate corporate sustainability reports. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy & Management, 15(3), 1–21.
Vurro, C., Russo, A., & Perrini, F. (2009). Shaping sustainable value chains: Network determinants of supply chain governance models. Journal of Business Ethics, 90(4), 607–621.CrossRef
Weber, M. (1947). The theory of economic and social organization. New York: Free Press.
Wiengarten, F., Pagell, M., & Fynes, B. (2012). Supply chain environmental investments in dynamic industries: Comparing investment and performance differences with static industries. International Journal of Production Economics, 135(2), 541–551.CrossRef
Wiklund, J. (1999). The sustainability of the entrepreneurial orientation–performance relationship. Entrepreneurship, Theory and Practice, 24(1), 37–48.CrossRef
Wolf, J. (2011). Sustainable supply chain management integration: A qualitative analysis of the German manufacturing industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(2), 221–235.CrossRef
Wolf, J. (2014). The relationship between sustainable supply chain management, stakeholder pressure and corporate sustainability performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 119(3), 317–328.CrossRef
Wu, Z., & Pagell, M. (2011). Balancing priorities: Decision-making in sustainable supply chain management. Journal of Operations Management, 29(6), 577–590.CrossRef
Zhao, X., Huo, B., Flynn, B. B., & Yeung, J. H. Y. (2008). The impact of power and relationship commitment on the integration between manufacturers and customers in a supply chain. Journal of Operations Management, 26(3), 368–388.CrossRef
Zhu, Q., & Sarkis, J. (2007). The moderating effects of institutional pressures on emergent green supply chain practices and performance. International Journal of Production Research, 45(18–19), 4333–4355.CrossRef
Zhu, Q., Sarkis, J., & Lai, K. (2013). Institutional-based antecedents and performance outcomes of internal and external green supply chain management practices. Journal of Purchasing Supply Management, 9(2), 106–117.CrossRef
Zorzini, M., Hendry, L. C., Huq, F. A., & Stevenson, M. (2015). Socially responsible sourcing: Reviewing the literature and its use of theory. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 35(1), 60–109.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Piggy in the Middle: How Direct Customer Power Affects First-Tier Suppliers’ Adoption of Socially Responsible Procurement Practices and Performance
verfasst von
Donna Marshall
Lucy McCarthy
Marius Claudy
Paul McGrath
Publikationsdatum
17.11.2016
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Journal of Business Ethics / Ausgabe 4/2019
Print ISSN: 0167-4544
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-0697
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3387-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2019

Journal of Business Ethics 4/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Original Paper

Can Corporations Be Held to the Public Interest, or Even to the Law?

Editorial

Rethinking Corporate Agency in Business, Philosophy, and Law

Original Paper

Corporate Essence and Identity in Criminal Law

Original Paper

Corporate Social Responsibility Report Narratives and Analyst Forecast Accuracy

Original Paper

Kantian Group Agency

Original Paper

New Evidence on the Role of the Media in Corporate Social Responsibility

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise