nach oben

Electronic Commerce Research

Erschienen in:

29.03.2021

20 years of Electronic Commerce Research

verfasst von: Satish Kumar, Weng Marc Lim, Nitesh Pandey, J. Christopher Westland

Erschienen in: Electronic Commerce Research | Ausgabe 1/2021

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

2021 marks the 20th anniversary of the founding of Electronic Commerce Research (ECR). The journal has changed substantially over its life, reflecting the wider changes in the tools and commercial focus of electronic commerce. ECR’s early focus was telecommunications and electronic commerce. After reorganization and new editorship in 2014, that focus expanded to embrace emerging tools, business models, and applications in electronic commerce, with an emphasis on the innovations and the vibrant growth of electronic commerce in Asia. Over this time, ECR’s impact and volume of publications have grown rapidly, and ECR is considered one of the premier journals in its discipline. This invited research summarizes the evolution of ECR’s research focus over its history.

Nächster Artikel Box-office forecasting in Korea using search trend data: a modified generalized Bass diffusion model

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Web of Science single-year and five-year impact factors for ECR: https://www.springer.com/journal/10660.

Scopus CiteScore and SNIP for ECR: https://www.scopus.com/sourceid/145669.

Schwert, G. W. (1993). The Journal of Financial Economics. A retrospective evaluation (1974–1991). Journal of Financial Economics, 33(3), 369–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405x(93)90012-z.CrossRef

Baker, H. K., Kumar, S., & Pandey, N. (2021). Thirty years of the Global Finance Journal: A bibliometric analysis. Global Finance Journal, 47, 100492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfj.2019.100492.CrossRef

Merigó, J. M., Pedrycz, W., Weber, R., & de la Sotta, C. (2018). Fifty years of Information Sciences: A bibliometric overview. Information Sciences, 432, 245–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2017.11.054.CrossRef

Kumar, S., Marrone, M., Liu, Q., & Pandey, N. (2020). Twenty years of the International Journal of Accounting Information Systems: A bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 39, 100488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accinf.2020.100488.CrossRef

Donthu, N., Kumar, S., & Pattnaik, D. (2020). Forty-five years of Journal of Business Research: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Business Research, 109(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.10.039.CrossRef

Ellegaard, O., & Wallin, J. A. (2015). The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? Scientometrics, 105(3), 1809–1831. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1645-z.CrossRef

Ramos-Rodrígue, A. R., & Ruíz-Navarro, J. (2004). Changes in the intellectual structure of strategic management research: A bibliometric study of the Strategic Management Journal, 1980–2000. Strategic Management Journal, 25(10), 981–1004. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.397.CrossRef

Valenzuela, L. M., Merigó, J. M., Johnston, W. J., Nicolas, C., & Jaramillo, J. F. (2017). Thirty years of the Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing: A bibliometric. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 31(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-04-2016-0079.CrossRef

Amiguet, L., Gil-lafuente, A. M., Kydland, F. E., & Merigó, J. M. (2017). One hundred twenty-five years of the Journal of Political Economy : a bibliometric overview. Journal of Political Economy, 1–41. Retrieved from https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/pb-assets/docs/journals/jpe-bib-125.pdf

10.

Mulet-Forteza, C., Martorell-Cunill, O., Merigó, J. M., Genovart-Balaguer, J., & Mauleon-Mendez, E. (2018). Twenty five years of the Journal of Travel and Tourism Marketing: A bibliometric ranking. Journal of Travel and Tourism Marketing, 35(9), 1201–1221. https://doi.org/10.1080/10548408.2018.1487368.CrossRef

11.

Baker, H. K., Kumar, S., & Pandey, N. (2020). A bibliometric analysis of managerial finance: A retrospective. Managerial Finance, 46(11), 1495–1517. https://doi.org/10.1108/MF-06-2019-0277.CrossRef

12.

Donthu, N., Kumar, S., & Pandey, N. (2020). A retrospective evaluation of Marketing Intelligence and Planning: 1983–2019. Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 39(1), 48–73. https://doi.org/10.1108/MIP-02-2020-0066.CrossRef

13.

Kumar, S., Spais, G. S., Kumar, D., & Sureka, R. (2020). A bibliometric history of the Journal of Promotion Management (1992–2019). Journal of Promotion Management, 26(1), 97–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/10496491.2019.1685622.CrossRef

14.

Kumar, S., Pandey, N., & Haldar, A. (2020). Twenty years of Public Management Review (PMR): A bibliometric overview. Public Management Review, 22(12), 1876–1896. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2020.1721122.CrossRef

15.

Broadus, R. N. (1987). Toward a definition of “bibliometrics.” Scientometrics, 12(5–6), 373–379. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02016680.CrossRef

16.

Cobo, M. J., López-Herrera, A. G., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2011). An approach for detecting, quantifying, and visualizing the evolution of a research field: A practical application to the fuzzy sets theory field. Journal of Informetrics, 5(1), 146–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.10.002.CrossRef

17.

Crane, D. (1969). Social structure in a group of scientists: A test of the invisible college. American Sociological Review, 34(3), 335–352.CrossRef

18.

Weinberg, B. H. (1974). Bibliographic coupling: A review. Information Storage and Retrieval, 10(5–6), 189–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-0271(74)90058-8.CrossRef

19.

Baker, H. K., Kumar, S., & Pandey, N. (2020). A bibliometric analysis of European Financial Managementʼs first 25 years. European Financial Management, 26(5), 1224–1260. https://doi.org/10.1111/eufm.12286.CrossRef

20.

Newman, M. E. J., & Girvan, M. (2004). Finding and evaluating community structure in networks. Physical Review E, 69(2), 26113. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.69.026113.CrossRef

21.

Comerio, N., & Strozzi, F. (2019). Tourism and its economic impact: A literature review using bibliometric tools. Tourism Economics, 25(1), 109–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354816618793762.CrossRef

22.

Li, J., Sanderson, M., Willett, P., Norris, M., & Oppenheim, C. (2010). Ranking of library and information science researchers: Comparison of data sources for correlating citation data, and expert judgments. Journal of Informetrics, 4(4), 554–563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.06.005.CrossRef

23.

van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3.CrossRef

24.

Bastian, M., Heymann, S., & Jacomy, M. (2009). Gephi: An open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. In Proceedings of the Third International ICWSM Conference (2009) (pp. 361–362). https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2004.010033.

25.

Rogers, G., Szomszor, M., & Adams, J. (2020). Sample size in bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics, 125, 777–794. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03647-7.CrossRef

26.

Füller, J., Bartl, M., Ernst, H., & Mühlbacher, H. (2006). Community based innovation: How to integrate members of virtual communities into new product development. Electronic Commerce Research, 6(1), 57–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-006-5988-7.CrossRef

27.

Sotiriadis, M. D., & van Zyl, C. (2013). Electronic word-of-mouth and online reviews in tourism services: The use of twitter by tourists. Electronic Commerce Research, 13(1), 103–124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-013-9108-1.CrossRef

28.

Nonnecke, B., Andrews, D., & Preece, J. (2006). Non-public and public online community participation: Needs, attitudes and behavior. Electronic Commerce Research, 6(1), 7–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-006-5985-x.CrossRef

29.

Lehdonvirta, V. (2009). Virtual item sales as a revenue model: Identifying attributes that drive purchase decisions. Electronic Commerce Research, 9(1–2), 97–113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-009-9028-2.CrossRef

30.

Bae, S., & Lee, T. (2011). Gender differences in consumers’ perception of online consumer reviews. Electronic Commerce Research, 11(2), 201–214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-010-9072-y.CrossRef

31.

Acedo, F. J., Barroso, C., Casanueva, C., & Galan, J. L. (2006). Co-authorship in management and organizational studies: An empirical and network analysis. Journal of Management Studies, 43(5), 957–983. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00625.x.CrossRef

32.

Baker, H. K., Kumar, S., & Pandey, N. (2020). Thirty years of Small Business Economics: A bibliometric overview. Small Business Economics, 56, 487–517. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-020-00342-y.CrossRef

33.

Burton, B., Kumar, S., & Pandey, N. (2020). Twenty-five years of The European Journal of Finance (EJF): A retrospective analysis. The European Journal of Finance, 26(1), 1817–1841. https://doi.org/10.1080/1351847X.2020.1754873.CrossRef

34.

Andrikopoulos, A., Samitas, A., & Kostaris, K. (2016). Four decades of the Journal of Econometrics: Coauthorship patterns and networks. Journal of Econometrics, 195(1), 23–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2016.04.018.CrossRef

35.

Kessler, M. M. (1963). Bibliographic coupling between scientific articles. American Documentation, 14(1), 123–131.CrossRef

36.

Zarmpou, T., Saprikis, V., Markos, A., & Vlachopoulou, M. (2012). Modeling users’ acceptance of mobile services. Electronic Commerce Research, 12(2), 225–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-012-9092-x.CrossRef

37.

Chaudhry, S. A., Farash, M. S., Naqvi, H., & Sher, M. (2016). A secure and efficient authenticated encryption for electronic payment systems using elliptic curve cryptography. Electronic Commerce Research, 16(1), 113–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-015-9192-5.CrossRef

38.

Antoniou, G., & Batten, L. (2011). E-commerce: Protecting purchaser privacy to enforce trust. Electronic Commerce Research, 11(4), 421–456. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-011-9083-3.CrossRef

39.

Morid, M. A., & Shajari, M. (2012). An enhanced e-commerce trust model for community based centralized systems. Electronic Commerce Research, 12(4), 409–427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-012-9099-3.CrossRef

40.

Smith, R., & Shao, J. (2007). Privacy and e-commerce: A consumer-centric perspective. Electronic Commerce Research, 7(2), 89–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-007-9002-9.CrossRef

41.

Kshetri, N. (2013). Cybercrime and cyber-security issues associated with China: Some economic and institutional considerations. Electronic Commerce Research, 13(1), 41–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-013-9105-4.CrossRef

42.

Goh, T. T., & Sun, S. (2014). Exploring gender differences in Islamic mobile banking acceptance. Electronic Commerce Research, 14(4), 435–458. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-014-9150-7.CrossRef

43.

Chen, Y., & Chou, J. S. (2015). ECC-based untraceable authentication for large-scale active-tag RFID systems. Electronic Commerce Research, 15(1), 97–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-014-9165-0.CrossRef

44.

Isaac, J. T., Zeadally, S., & Cámara, J. S. (2012). A lightweight secure mobile payment protocol for vehicular ad-hoc networks (VANETs). Electronic Commerce Research, 12(1), 97–123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-011-9086-0.CrossRef

45.

Jeffrey, S. A., & Hodge, R. (2007). Factors influencing impulse buying during an online purchase. Electronic Commerce Research, 7(3–4), 367–379. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-007-9011-8.CrossRef

46.

Biller, S., Chan, L. M. A., Simchi-Levi, D., & Swann, J. (2005). Dynamic pricing and the direct-to-customer model in the automotive industry. Electronic Commerce Research, 5(2), 309–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-005-6161-4.CrossRef

47.

Yan, R. (2008). Profit sharing and firm performance in the manufacturer-retailer dual-channel supply chain. Electronic Commerce Research, 8(3), 155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-008-9020-2.CrossRef

48.

Cui, Y., Mou, J., & Liu, Y. (2018). Knowledge mapping of social commerce research: A visual analysis using CiteSpace. Electronic Commerce Research, 18(4), 837–868. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-018-9288-9.CrossRef

49.

Li, S., & Sun, W. (2016). A mechanism for resource pricing and fairness in peer-to-peer networks. Electronic Commerce Research, 16(4), 425–451. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-016-9211-1.CrossRef

50.

Wang, Z. B., Wang, Y. Y., & Wang, J. C. (2016). Optimal distribution channel strategy for new and remanufactured products. Electronic Commerce Research, 16(2), 269–295. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-016-9225-8.CrossRef

51.

Rofin, T. M., & Mahanty, B. (2018). Optimal dual-channel supply chain configuration for product categories with different customer preference of online channel. Electronic Commerce Research, 18(3), 507–536. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-017-9269-4.CrossRef

52.

Sila, I. (2013). Factors affecting the adoption of B2B e-commerce technologies. Electronic Commerce Research, 13(2), 199–236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-013-9110-7.CrossRef

53.

Ozok, A. A., & Wei, J. (2010). An empirical comparison of consumer usability preferences in online shopping using stationary and mobile devices: Results from a college student population. Electronic Commerce Research, 10(2), 111–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-010-9048-y.CrossRef

54.

Grace-Farfaglia, P., Dekkers, A., Sundararajan, B., Peters, L., & Park, S. H. (2006). Multinational web uses and gratifications: measuring the social impact of online community participation across national boundaries. Electronic Commerce Research, 6(1), 75–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-006-5989-6.CrossRef

55.

Chen, K., Jin, J., Zhao, Z., & Ji, P. (2020). Understanding customer regional differences from online opinions: A hierarchical Bayesian approach. Electronic Commerce Research (in press). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-020-09420-5.CrossRef

56.

Ma, Y., Chen, G., & Wei, Q. (2017). Finding users preferences from large-scale online reviews for personalized recommendation. Electronic Commerce Research, 17(1), 3–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-016-9240-9.CrossRef

57.

Yoon, S. H., & Kim, H. W. (2019). What content and context factors lead to selection of a video clip? The heuristic route perspective. Electronic Commerce Research, 19(3), 603–627. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-019-09355-6.CrossRef

58.

Pan, H., & Zhou, H. (2020). Study on convolutional neural network and its application in data mining and sales forecasting for e-commerce. Electronic Commerce Research, 20(2), 297–320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-020-09409-0.CrossRef

59.

Pu, P., Chen, L., & Kumar, P. (2008). Evaluating product search and recommender systems for e-commerce environments. Electronic Commerce Research, 8(1–2), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-008-9015-z.CrossRef

60.

Panniello, U., & Gorgoglione, M. (2012). Incorporating context into recommender systems: An empirical comparison of context-based approaches. Electronic Commerce Research, 12(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-012-9087-7.CrossRef

61.

Zhou, Q. (2018). Multi-layer affective computing model based on emotional psychology. Electronic Commerce Research, 18(1), 109–124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-017-9265-8.CrossRef

62.

Suki, N. M. (2013). Consumer shopping behaviour on the Internet: Insights from Malaysia. Electronic Commerce Research, 13(4), 477–491. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-013-9131-2.CrossRef

63.

Chen, Y., Mullen, T., & Chu, C. H. (2006). An in-depth analysis of information markets with aggregate uncertainty. Electronic Commerce Research, 6(2), 201–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-006-6958-9.CrossRef

64.

Kang, H. G., Bae, K., Shin, J. A., & Jeon, S. (2020). Will data on internet queries predict the performance in the marketplace: An empirical study on online searches and IPO stock returns. Electronic Commerce Research (in press). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-020-09417-0.CrossRef

65.

Cui, Y., Mou, J., Cohen, J., & Liu, Y. (2019). Understanding information system success model and valence framework in sellers’ acceptance of cross-border e-commerce: A sequential multi-method approach. Electronic Commerce Research, 19(4), 885–914. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-019-09331-0.CrossRef

66.

Liu, S., Shao, B., Gao, Y., Hu, S., Li, Y., & Zhou, W. (2018). Game theoretic approach of a novel decision policy for customers based on big data. Electronic Commerce Research, 18(2), 225–240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-017-9259-6.CrossRef

67.

Tian, X., & Liu, L. (2017). Does big data mean big knowledge? Integration of big data analysis and conceptual model for social commerce research. Electronic Commerce Research, 17(1), 169–183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-016-9242-7.CrossRef

68.

Flanagin, A. J., Metzger, M. J., Pure, R., Markov, A., & Hartsell, E. (2014). Mitigating risk in ecommerce transactions: perceptions of information credibility and the role of user-generated ratings in product quality and purchase intention. Electronic Commerce Research, 14(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-014-9139-2.CrossRef

69.

Fairlie, R. W. (2007). Explaining differences in access to home computers and the Internet: A comparison of Latino groups to other ethnic and racial groups. Electronic Commerce Research, 7(3–4), 265–291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-007-9006-5.CrossRef

70.

Gerdes, J., Stringam, B. B., & Brookshire, R. G. (2008). An integrative approach to assess qualitative and quantitative consumer feedback. Electronic Commerce Research, 8(4), 217–234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-008-9022-0.CrossRef

71.

Tsao, W. C., & Hsieh, M. T. (2015). eWOM persuasiveness: Do eWOM platforms and product type matter? Electronic Commerce Research, 15(4), 509–541. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-015-9198-z.CrossRef

72.

Zhang, H., Rao, H., & Feng, J. (2018). Product innovation based on online review data mining: A case study of Huawei phones. Electronic Commerce Research, 18(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-017-9279-2.CrossRef

73.

Liu, Q., Zhang, X., Zhang, L., & Zhao, Y. (2019). The interaction effects of information cascades, word of mouth and recommendation systems on online reading behavior: An empirical investigation. Electronic Commerce Research, 19(3), 521–547. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-018-9312-0.CrossRef

74.

Chen, R., & Xu, W. (2017). The determinants of online customer ratings: a combined domain ontology and topic text analytics approach. Electronic Commerce Research, 17(1), 31–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-016-9243-6.CrossRef

75.

Narayanasamy, K., Rasiah, D., & Tan, T. M. (2011). The adoption and concerns of e-finance in Malaysia. Electronic Commerce Research, 11(4), 383–400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-011-9081-5.CrossRef

76.

Dumas, M., Aldred, L., Governatori, G., & Ter Hofstede, A. H. M. (2005). Probabilistic automated bidding in multiple auctions. Electronic Commerce Research, 5(1), 25–49. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ELEC.0000045972.75533.90.CrossRef

77.

Marinč, M. (2013). Banks and information technology: Marketability vs. relationships. Electronic Commerce Research, 13(1), 71–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-013-9107-2.CrossRef

78.

Maillé, P., Markakis, E., Naldi, M., Stamoulis, G. D., & Tuffin, B. (2012). Sponsored search auctions: An overview of research with emphasis on game theoretic aspects. Electronic Commerce Research, 12(3), 265–300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-012-9094-8.CrossRef

79.

Maillé, P., & Tuffin, B. (2018). Auctions for online ad space among advertisers sensitive to both views and clicks. Electronic Commerce Research, 18(3), 485–506. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-017-9267-6.CrossRef

80.

Håvaldsrud, T. V., Ligaarden, O. S., Myrseth, P., Refsdal, A., Stølen, K., & Ølnes, J. (2010). Experiences from using a UML-based method for trust analysis in an industrial project on electronic procurement. Electronic Commerce Research, 10(3–4), 441–467. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-010-9063-z.CrossRef

81.

Dráb, R., Štofa, T., & Delina, R. (2020). Analysis of the efficiency of electronic reverse auction settings: Big data evidence. Electronic Commerce Research (in press). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-020-09433-0.CrossRef

82.

Bei, L. T., & Chen, M. Y. (2015). The effects of hedonic and utilitarian bidding values on e-auction behavior. Electronic Commerce Research, 15(4), 483–507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-015-9197-0.CrossRef

83.

Huang, T. L., & Liao, S. (2015). A model of acceptance of augmented-reality interactive technology: The moderating role of cognitive innovativeness. Electronic Commerce Research, 15(2), 269–295. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-014-9163-2.CrossRef

84.

Hsieh, J. K., Hsieh, Y. C., & Tang, Y. C. (2012). Exploring the disseminating behaviors of eWOM marketing: Persuasion in online video. Electronic Commerce Research, 12(2), 201–224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-012-9091-y.CrossRef

85.

Zhang, L., Luo, M., & Boncella, R. J. (2020). Product information diffusion in a social network. Electronic Commerce Research, 20(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-018-9316-9.CrossRef

86.

Zhanikeev, M. (2015). How variable bitrate video formats can help P2P streaming boost its reliability and scale. Electronic Commerce Research, 15(1), 25–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-015-9175-6.CrossRef

87.

Cheng, X., Gu, Y., & Mou, J. (2020). Interpersonal relationship building in social commerce communities: Considering both swift guanxi and relationship commitment. Electronic Commerce Research, 20(1), 53–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-019-09375-2.CrossRef

88.

Chu, X., Liu, Y., Chen, X., Ding, Z., & Tao, S. (2020). What motivates consumer to engage in microblogs? The roles of brand post characteristics and brand prestige. Electronic Commerce Research (in press). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-020-09435-y.CrossRef

89.

Zhou, T. (2013). An empirical examination of user adoption of location-based services. Electronic Commerce Research, 13(1), 25–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-013-9106-3.CrossRef

90.

Chen, Q., Chen, H. M., & Kazman, R. (2007). Investigating antecedents of technology acceptance of initial ECRM users beyond generation X and the role of self-construal. Electronic Commerce Research, 7(3–4), 315–339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-007-9009-2.CrossRef

91.

Royo, S., & Yetano, A. (2015). “Crowdsourcing” as a tool for e-participation: Two experiences regarding CO₂ emissions at municipal level. Electronic Commerce Research, 15(3), 323–348. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-015-9183-6.CrossRef

92.

Chen, D., Li, X., & Lai, F. (2017). Gender discrimination in online peer-to-peer credit lending: Evidence from a lending platform in China. Electronic Commerce Research, 17(4), 553–583. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-016-9247-2.CrossRef

93.

Yu, C. H., & Lin, S. J. (2013). Fuzzy rule optimization for online auction frauds detection based on genetic algorithm. Electronic Commerce Research, 13(2), 169–182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-013-9113-4.CrossRef

94.

Yan, Y., Lv, Z., & Hu, B. (2018). Building investor trust in the P2P lending platform with a focus on Chinese P2P lending platforms. Electronic Commerce Research, 18(2), 203–224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-017-9255-x.CrossRef

95.

Guo, Y., & Barnes, S. (2009). Virtual item purchase behavior in virtual worlds: An exploratory investigation. Electronic Commerce Research, 9(1–2), 77–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-009-9032-6.CrossRef

96.

Bourlakis, M., Papagiannidis, S., & Li, F. (2009). Retail spatial evolution: Paving the way from traditional to metaverse retailing. Electronic Commerce Research, 9(1–2), 135–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-009-9030-8.CrossRef

97.

MacInnes, I. (2006). Property rights, legal issues, and business models in virtual world communities. Electronic Commerce Research, 6(1), 39–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-006-5987-8.CrossRef

98.

Cagnina, M. R., & Poian, M. (2009). Beyond e-business models: The road to virtual worlds. Electronic Commerce Research, 9(1–2), 49–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-009-9027-3.CrossRef

99.

Scarle, S., Arnab, S., Dunwell, I., Petridis, P., Protopsaltis, A., & de Freitas, S. (2012). E-commerce transactions in a virtual environment: Virtual transactions. Electronic Commerce Research, 12(3), 379–407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-012-9098-4.CrossRef

100.

Hanafizadeh, P., & Khedmatgozar, H. R. (2012). The mediating role of the dimensions of the perceived risk in the effect of customers’ awareness on the adoption of Internet banking in Iran. Electronic Commerce Research, 12(2), 151–175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-012-9090-z.CrossRef

101.

Valvi, A. C., & Fragkos, K. C. (2012). Critical review of the e-loyalty literature: A purchase-centred framework. Electronic Commerce Research, 12(3), 331–378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-012-9097-5.CrossRef

102.

Aloudat, A., & Michael, K. (2011). Toward the regulation of ubiquitous mobile government: A case study on location-based emergency services in Australia. Electronic Commerce Research, 11(1), 31–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-010-9070-0.CrossRef

103.

Tsai, H. T., Chien, J. L., & Tsai, M. T. (2014). The influences of system usability and user satisfaction on continued Internet banking services usage intention: Empirical evidence from Taiwan. Electronic Commerce Research, 14(2), 137–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-014-9136-5.CrossRef

104.

Li, H., Aham-Anyanwu, N., Tevrizci, C., & Luo, X. (2015). The interplay between value and service quality experience: E-loyalty development process through the eTailQ scale and value perception. Electronic Commerce Research, 15(4), 585–615. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-015-9202-7.CrossRef

105.

Khedmatgozar, H. R., & Shahnazi, A. (2018). The role of dimensions of perceived risk in adoption of corporate internet banking by customers in Iran. Electronic Commerce Research, 18(2), 389–412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-017-9253-z.CrossRef

106.

Zhou, R., Wang, X., Shi, Y., Zhang, R., Zhang, L., & Guo, H. (2019). Measuring e-service quality and its importance to customer satisfaction and loyalty: an empirical study in a telecom setting. Electronic Commerce Research, 19(3), 477–499. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-018-9301-3.CrossRef

107.

Kim, J. B. (2012). An empirical study on consumer first purchase intention in online shopping: Integrating initial trust and TAM. Electronic Commerce Research, 12(2), 125–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-012-9089-5.CrossRef

108.

Gregg, D. G., & Walczak, S. (2010). The relationship between website quality, trust and price premiums at online auctions. Electronic Commerce Research, 10(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-010-9044-2.CrossRef

109.

Taylor, D. G., Davis, D. F., & Jillapalli, R. (2009). Privacy concern and online personalization: The moderating effects of information control and compensation. Electronic Commerce Research, 9(3), 203–223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-009-9036-2.CrossRef

110.

Castañeda, J. A., & Montoro, F. J. (2007). The effect of Internet general privacy concern on customer behavior. Electronic Commerce Research, 7(2), 117–141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-007-9000-y.CrossRef

111.

Chen, M. Y., & Teng, C. I. (2013). A comprehensive model of the effects of online store image on purchase intention in an e-commerce environment. Electronic Commerce Research, 13(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-013-9104-5.CrossRef

112.

Goel, L., & Prokopec, S. (2009). If you build it will they come? An empirical investigation of consumer perceptions and strategy in virtual worlds. Electronic Commerce Research, 9(1–2), 115–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-009-9031-7112.CrossRef

113.

Ninia, J. (2020). The impact of e-commerce: China versus the United States. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University.

114.

IBM Research. (2020). Our labs. IBM. Available at https://www.research.ibm.com/labs/

115.

Klein, J. T., & Falk-Krzesinski, H. J. (2017). Interdisciplinary and collaborative work: Framing promotion and tenure practices and policies. Research Policy, 46(6), 1055–1061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.03.001.CrossRef

116.

Lim, W. M. (2019). To what degree is the fourth industrial revolution an opportunity or a threat for the ASEAN community and region? Modern Applied Science, 13(9), 105–106. https://doi.org/10.5539/mas.v13n9p105.CrossRef

117.

Wijaya, D. R., Paramita, N. L. P. S. P., Uluwiyah, A., Rheza, M., Zahara, A., & Puspita, D. R. (2021). Estimating city-level poverty rate based on e-commerce data with machine learning. Electronic Commerce Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-020-09424-.CrossRef

118.

Lim, W. M. (2020). Challenger marketing. Industrial Marketing Management, 84, 342–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2019.08.009.CrossRef

119.

Lim, W. M. (2020). In defense of challenger marketing. Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing, 27(4), 397–406. https://doi.org/10.1080/1051712X.2020.1831214.CrossRef

120.

Lim, W. M. (2020). The sharing economy: A marketing perspective. Australasian Marketing Journal, 28(3), 4–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ausmj.2020.06.007.CrossRef

121.

Lim, W. M. (2016). Understanding the selfie phenomenon: Current insights and future research directions. European Journal of Marketing, 50(9/10), 1773–1788. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-07-2015-0484.CrossRef

122.

Lim, W. M. (2018). Demystifying neuromarketing. Journal of Business Research, 91, 205–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.05.036.CrossRef

123.

Lim, W. M. (2018). Dialectic antidotes to critics of the technology acceptance model: Conceptual, methodological, and replication treatments for behavioural modelling in technology-mediated environments. Australasian Journal of Information Systems. https://doi.org/10.3127/ajis.v22i0.1651.CrossRef

124.

Lim, W. M. (2018). What will business-to-business marketers learn from neuro-marketing? Insights for business marketing practice. Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing, 25(3), 251–259. https://doi.org/10.1080/1051712X.2018.1488915.CrossRef

125.

Lim, W. M., Ahmed, P. K., & Ali, M. Y. (2019). Data and resource maximization in business-to-business marketing experiments: Methodological insights from data partitioning. Industrial Marketing Management, 76, 136–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2018.08.007.CrossRef

126.

Lim, W. M., Yap, S. F., & Makkar, M. (2021). Home sharing in marketing and tourism at a tipping point: What do we know, how do we know, and where should we be heading? Journal of Business Research, 122, 534–566. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-07-2015-0484.CrossRef

Titel: 20 years of Electronic Commerce Research
verfasst von: Satish Kumar
Weng Marc Lim
Nitesh Pandey
J. Christopher Westland
Publikationsdatum: 29.03.2021
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Electronic Commerce Research / Ausgabe 1/2021
Print ISSN: 1389-5753
Elektronische ISSN: 1572-9362
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-021-09464-1

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2021

Will data on internet queries predict the performance in the marketplace: an empirical study on online searches and IPO stock returns

Box-office forecasting in Korea using search trend data: a modified generalized Bass diffusion model

Prediction on transaction amounts of China’s CBEC with improved GM (1, 1) models based on the principle of new information priority

26 years left behind: a historical and predictive analysis of electronic business research

Crowdfunding as a screener for collective investment

A longitudinal study of e-commerce diversity in Europe